Skip to main content

Antisocial Behaviour Orders

Volume 470: debated on Tuesday 8 January 2008

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when the rate of breach of antisocial behaviour orders in 2006 will be published. (173831)

The latest data on breach of antisocial behaviour orders are due to be published in spring 2008.

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many antisocial behaviour orders were issued in (a) the city of Sunderland and (b) the north east in each year since 2001. (175220)

The information requested is provided in the following tables.

Number of ASBOs issued at all courts, as reported to the Home Office by the Court Service, by period and where restrictions are imposed within the local authority area of the city of Sunderland, up to 31 December 2005

1 January to 31 December each year

City of Sunderland

2001-01

2002-02

2

2003-03

6

2004-04

18

2005-05

43

2001-05

69

Notes:

1. This local authority area table differs from criminal justice system area (cjsa) tables in that an issuing court can be outside the area in which the restrictions have been imposed. For example, an issuing court may be in Hampshire (cjsa) but restrictions apply solely to a local authority area within Dorset.

2. Previously issued data have been revised following joint Home Office/Court Service data reconciliation exercises.

3. Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.

Source:

RDS-OCJR

Number of antisocial behaviour orders issued at all courts, as reported to the Home Office by the Court Service, in the north east region by year, January 2001 to December 2005

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Total

North east region

22

29

55

133

260

499

Of which:

Cleveland

4

5

14

28

60

111

Durham

9

8

16

31

27

91

Northumbria

9

16

25

74

173

297

Notes:

1. Previously issued data have been revised following joint Home Office/Court Service data reconciliation exercises.

2. Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.