Skip to main content

Offenders: Accommodation

Volume 471: debated on Monday 28 January 2008

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice pursuant to the answer of 21 January 2008, Official Report, column 1654W, on Offenders: Accommodation, how many of those receiving bail in respect of alleged violence against the person breached their bail conditions as a result of (a) alleged re-offending, (b) failure to attend court and (c) another cause. (182271)

In 2006, an estimated 5,500 defendants proceeded against for offences in the violence against the person group failed to appear to bail. This information is taken from table 4.9 of the publication “Criminal Statistics 2006, England and Wales”. Data on re-offending while on bail and on breaches of bail conditions are not collected centrally.

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) pursuant to the answer of 21 January 2008, Official Report, column 1654W, on Offenders: Accommodation, how many of those bailed for violence against the person (a) were acquitted, (b) received a custodial sentence and (c) received a non-custodial sentence in each of the last three years; (182270)

(2) what proportion of defendants (a) bailed and (b) remanded in custody (i) were acquitted, (ii) received a custodial sentence and (iii) received a non-custodial sentence in the latest period for which figures are available.

Data showing the number and percentages of defendants acquitted, and receiving custodial and non-custodial sentences, whether remanded on bail or in custody, for 2004-06 (latest three years available) can be found in the following table. These data are a summary of table 4.8 in the annual publication “Criminal Statistics, England and Wales”. An offence group breakdown is not available by outcome. The general presumption in favour of remand on bail (though subject to important exceptions) is based upon the fundamental principle of our legal system that a person is innocent until proven guilty.

Persons proceeded against by type of remand and final outcome at magistrates courts and the Crown court1, 2004-06—England and Wales

Number of persons (thousand)

2004

2005

2006

Final outcome

Bailed

Remanded in custody2

Bailed

Remanded in custody2

Bailed

Remanded in custody2

Acquitted or not proceeded with etc.

151.2

17.0

130.8

14.5

119.2

12.8

Convicted:

Immediate custody3

44.8

43.7

42.0

41.3

38.7

39.7

Non-custodial sentence4

261.9

22.4

259.1

19.9

258.4

18.0

Total number sentenced5

319.9

69.6

314.2

64.7

310.1

61.2

Total

471.1

86.6

445.0

79.2

429.3

74.0

Percentage of persons

2004

2005

2006

Final outcome

Bailed

Remanded in custody2

Bailed

Remanded in custody2

Bailed

Remanded in custody2

Acquitted or not proceeded with etc.

32

20

29

18

28

17

Convicted:

Immediate custody3

10

50

9

52

9

54

Non-custodial sentence4

56

26

58

25

60

24

Total number sentenced5

68

80

71

82

72

83

Total

100

100

100

100

100

100

1 Remand status shown is that given by the court passing sentence.

2 Includes those remanded for part of the time in custody and part on bail. These figures are not directly comparable with the number of persons received on remand into Prison Service establishments (published annually in “Offender Management Caseload Statistics”). This is mainly because these figures relate to the year of the final court decision, rather than the year of the initial reception into prison on remand, which may be different.

3 Includes detention in a young offender institution, detention and training orders and unsuspended imprisonment.

4 Includes discharges, fines, community sentences, and fully suspended sentences.

5 Includes offences otherwise dealt with, not counted as custodial or non-custodial sentences.

Note:

Every effort is made to ensure that the estimates presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.