Skip to main content

Regional Development Agencies: Consultants

Volume 471: debated on Wednesday 30 January 2008

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (1) how much each regional development agency spent on consultants in (a) 2004-05, (b) 2005-06 and (c) 2006-07; (178969)

(2) what procedures and criteria are applied by regional development agencies to the selection and appointment of consultants; and what tasks regional development agencies have appointed consultants to undertake since 2004.

Consultancy services have been identified as services commissioned by RDAs to inform the management of the Agency, organisational development, strategy development, and communications and marketing. The services are used when the necessary knowledge and resources cannot be found in-house.

This definition does not relate to services for specific project or programme delivery (for example legal advice on land deals as part of development projects).

The following table shows how much each RDA has spent on consultants in 2004-05, 2005-06 and 2006-07. Figures in £000.

£000

RDAs

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

AWM

672

496

247

EEDA

226

714

563

EMDA

149

228

148

LDA

335

287

11,400

NWDA

792

535

518

ONE

200

309

197

SEEDA

125

98

120

SWRDA

648

557

281

YF

296

194

228

1 LDA. An Agency wide restructure was key to implementing changes required to align the LDA management team with the challenges and opportunities presented as a result of London winning the 2012 Olympics. Consultants were employed to oversee the restructure and the ‘New ways of Working' project.

Consultancy services are procured in accordance with OJEU and public procurement regulations (public contract regulations 2003 and 2006), and individual RDA financial memoranda and regulations.

Appointments are made either through a pre-tendered panel of suppliers or through a competitive procurement process. RDA procurement procedures include documented tender specification, and an assessment of the supplier's financial standing, pricing, quality and capacity to deliver the assignment and value for money.