Skip to main content

Reoffenders

Volume 471: debated on Monday 4 February 2008

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice (1) how many and what proportion of probation recalls to prison were for serious offences in each month since 2000; and if he will make a statement; (182684)

(2) how many probation recalls to prison were there in each month since 2000; and if he will make a statement;

(3) how many prison recalls there were in each year since 2000; how many in each year were due to (a) breaches of licence and (b) committal of further offences; and if he will make a statement.

Information held centrally gives a breakdown of recalled offenders and a breakdown of offenders who were charged with committing a serious further offence, as defined by the national probation serious further offence review process. To provide a breakdown of offenders who were both charged with a serious further offence and who were subsequently recalled would require a manual trawl of two databases; this would incur disproportionate cost.

The annual figures for the number of offenders who were on licence (including life licence and Home Detention Curfew) and recalled to custody are in the following table. To break this information down into monthly totals would incur disproportionate cost.

Financial year

Number of determinate recalls

2000-01

3,226

2001-02

5,042

2002-03

9,057

The number of prisoner recalled to custody has increased over recent years. There are several reasons for this increase: nearly all prisoners on licence can now be recalled to prison executively by the Secretary of State. Prior to 1998, prisoners serving less than four years could be recalled only by the courts, a slow and bureaucratic process that was rarely used. The Probation Service has become far more effective in enforcing licence conditions. In 1997 appropriate enforcement action was taken in only a third of cases where the offender breached a sentence being served in the community. This figure was over 90 per cent. in 2007; and there is more robust supervision of high risk licensees and better information sharing between police and probation, through multi agency public protection arrangements.

A breakdown of the number of offenders returned to custody following a breach of their licence (including life licence and Home Detention Curfew conditions) in each month since June 2003 is in the table.

Month/year

Total

2003

June

914

July

956

August

869

September

915

October

1,113

November

880

December

987

2004

January

1,046

February

1,065

March

1,079

April

945

May

941

June

1,007

July

1,029

August

900

September

943

October

915

November

962

December

900

2005

January

893

February

821

March

817

April

974

May

880

June

1,053

July

1,089

August

1,014

September

616

October

978

November

1,114

December

1,007

2006

January

949

February

815

March

963

April

757

May

1,028

June

981

July

1,300

August

1,233

September

1,300

October

1,146

November

1,009

December

943

2007

January

1,234

February

1,147

March

1,196

April

957

May

1,025

June

1,155

July

1,183

August

1,214

September

907

October

1,157

November

1,132

December

992

All offenders recalled to custody will have breached one or more of the conditions of their licence (including those on life licence and the Home Detention Curfew scheme). We do not hold a comprehensive breakdown of reasons for recall prior to April 2007. The number of offenders recalled in each of the last 12 months together with the number recalled following a charge for a further offence since April 2007 is provided in the table as follows.

As at 2007

Number of offenders recalled

Number recalled for further charges

January

1,234

February

1,147

March

1,196

April

957

246

May

1,025

223

June

1,155

261

July

1,183

272

August

1,214

321

September

907

241

October

1,157

266

November

1,132

287

December

992

172