The following table shows how much each regional development agency spent on consultants, IT systems, advertising and branding in each of the last five years.
Consultancy1 IT systems2 RDAs 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 AWM 572 453 672 496 247 271 504 169 199 257 EEDA 279 267 226 714 563 526 721 705 771 810 EMDA 621 295 149 228 148 481 878 523 389 309 LDA3 — — 335 287 1,400 — — 1,024 1,085 1,675 NWDA 874 815 792 535 518 38 70 206 262 437 ONE 183 146 200 309 197 590 695 502 589 663 SEEDA 110 80 125 98 120 282 143 239 228 363 SWRDA 527 431 648 557 281 232 318 463 356 1,312 YF 180 270 296 194 228 758 1,537 790 725 754
Advertising4 Branding5 RDAs 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 AWM6 511 553 1,366 1,473 3,144 — — — — — EEDA 261 131 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EMDA 102 110 99 85 35 0 0 0 0 38 LDA7 77 333 634 275 393 — — — 214 194 NWDA 149 99 198 185 414 7 33 0 30 21 ONE8 — 207 1,302 3,374 4,450 0 0 0 0 0 SEEDA9 143 201 363 232 163 — — — — — SWRDA10 449 432 960 1,227 1,271 — — — — — YF 2,062 599 642 1,006 701 57 382 38 16.5 11 1 Consultancy services have been identified as services commissioned by RDAs to inform the management of the agency, organisational development, strategy development, and communications and marketing. This definition does not relate to services for specific project or programme delivery (for example legal advice on land deals as part of development projects). 2 IT systems covers hardware maintenance, internet and website charges, hardware procurement, membership and licences, other computer consumables, service level agreements, and software maintenance. 3 LDA adopted new recording systems in 2004-05. Figures before 2004-05 are not held centrally and can be provided only at disproportionate cost. 4 Advertising figures relate to marketing initiatives procured to promote the region. 5 Branding figures relate to the cost of including the agency logo in publicity material relating to partnership projects (eg billboards at regeneration sites), or costs related to developing or promoting the region or agency brand. In many cases, project developers bear the cost of branding related to specific projects, as per funding agreements with the RDA involved. 6 AWM is unable to separate marketing and branding costs within the “Marketing the Region” budget. Please refer to advertising figures. 7 Branding figures before 2005-06 are not held centrally and can be provided only at disproportionate cost. 8 There are no advertising figures for 2002-03 as Northumbria Tourism Board were financially responsible for tourism marketing in the region. The responsibility for tourism marketing for the entire North East region switched to ONE in 2004-05. 9 SEEDA is unable to separate marketing and branding costs. Please refer to advertising costs. 10 SWRDA is unable to separate the cost of project-specific marketing and branding from general marketing and branding expenditure. Please refer to advertising figures.
The following table shows how much was spent on office premises by each RDA in the last five years.
£000 RDAs 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 AWM 940 1,407 1,503 1,692 1,475 EEDA 695 577 1,095 760 1,111 EMDA 490 672 783 907 921 LDA 1,296 3,221 3,048 3,356 2,316 NWDA 2,099 1,855 1,611 1,872 2,093 ONE2 435 652 618 1,023 1,230 SEEDA3 1,853 2,299 1,931 1,755 1,741 SWRDA4 743 711 721 1,061 1,284 YF 950 1,211 648 1,812 832 1 Includes rent, rates, service charges, insurances, cleaning, utilities, security, and maintenance. Figures refer to head offices and other smaller offices from which RDA staff work throughout the region. Some RDAs own their own premises, others rent or lease accommodation. Also, in the last five years some RDAs have moved offices. 2 From 2003, ONE took on extra responsibilities including tourism and transfer of some responsibilities from Government office. The lower costs in earlier years were a rent-free period on taking up the leases. 3 Calculated at net costs, rent income is deducted. 4 2006-07: rent increases at two offices together with arrears paid from April 2005. 5 In February 2005, YF purchased the premises which it was renting. This accounts for the subsequent increase in expenditure 2005-06. As the organisation's responsibilities expanded it has rented additional office space next door to its current premises.