Skip to main content

Rape

Volume 476: debated on Wednesday 21 May 2008

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many and what proportion of those convicted of rape were aged (a) 10 to 15, (b) 16 to 18, (c) 19 to 25, (d) 26 to 30 and (e) over 30 years in each of the last 10 years for which figures are available. (206501)

Data showing the number of defendants found guilty of rape, broken down by age group, in England and Wales from 1997 to 2006 are in the following table.

The statistics relate to persons for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences the principal offence is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe.

Number of defendants convicted of rape1 at all courts, by age group, England and Wales, 1997 to 20062, 3

Age

1997

1998

1999

20004

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

10-15

20

8

19

12

15

8

14

10

25

31

16-18

45

21

39

37

31

28

26

28

66

63

19-25

72

95

62

77

79

76

107

148

127

142

26-30

72

72

64

66

54

73

67

77

65

72

31 and over

308

375

377

313

315

363

369

381

411

446

All ages

517

571

561

505

494

548

583

644

694

754

1 The following offences and statutes have been included in the above data;

Rape of a female aged under 16. - Sexual Offences Act 2003 S.1

Rape of a female aged 16 or over. - Sexual Offences Act 2003 S.1

Rape of a male aged under 16. - Sexual Offences Act 2003 S.1

Rape of a male aged 16 or over - Sexual Offences Act 2003 S.1

Rape of a female child under 13 by a male - Sexual Offences Act 2003 S. 5

Rape of a male child under 13 by a male - Sexual Offences Act 2003 S. 5

2 These data are on the principal offence basis.

3 Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts and police forces. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.

4 Staffordshire police force were only able to submit sample data for persons proceeded against and convicted in the magistrates courts for the year 2000. Although sufficient to estimate higher orders of data, these data are not robust enough at a detailed level and have been excluded from the table.