As Lord Sutherland reported, DCSF had comprehensive arrangements in place to monitor QCA’s performance, including good project and risk management processes which provided thorough coverage across the Department’s business. Between June 2007 and early July 2008 (when the NAA alerted Ministers to the likely delays to the release of test data), DCSF officials reported their assessment of risks to DCSF Ministers on several occasions. Ministers also received regular updates on national curriculum test delivery from the QCA and NAA, who continued to reassure Ministers as late as 17 June that delivery remained on track. Ministers responded to these assessments by seeking reassurance from QCA and NAA that they had suitable action in hand to secure delivery of their contractors’ obligations.
As Lord Sutherland reported, DCSF had comprehensive arrangements in place to monitor QCA’s performance, including good project and risk management processes which provided thorough coverage across the Department’s business. Between January 2008 and early July (when the NAA alerted Ministers to the likely delays to the release of test data), DCSF officials reported their assessment of risks to DCSF Ministers on several occasions. Thereafter, Ministers also received regular, and at least weekly, updates on national curriculum test delivery from the QCA and NAA, who continued to reassure Ministers as late as 17 June that delivery remained on track. Ministers responded to these assessments by seeking reassurance from QCA and NAA that they had suitable action in hand to secure delivery of their contractors’ obligations.