Skip to main content

Children: Maintenance

Volume 489: debated on Wednesday 11 March 2009

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many benefit claimants in (a) Great Britain, (b) each region and (c) each London borough did not receive the full child support payment in each of the last 12 months. (242177)

The administration of the child maintenance system is a matter for the Commissioner of the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission. He will write to the hon. Member with the information requested.

Letter from Stephen Geraghty:

In reply to your recent Parliamentary Question, the Secretary of State promised a substantive reply from the Child Maintenance Commissioner as the Child Support Agency is now the responsibility of the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission.

You asked the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many claimants in (a) Great Britain (b) each region and (c) each London borough did not receive the full child support payment in each of the last 12 months. [242177]

It should be noted that the Child Maintenance and Other Payments Act 2008 made changes to the way child maintenance is paid to parents with care in receipt of income based benefits. Prior to 27 October 2008, the Child Support Agency, on behalf of the Secretary of State, was required to retain a proportion of child maintenance received in respect of parents with care in receipt of income based benefits. From 27 October 2008, the Agency forwards all maintenance received and parents with care in receipt of benefits will need to inform Jobcentre Plus about any maintenance they have received.

The information you have requested in respect of the number of cases where the non-resident parent paid all, part or none of the child maintenance due in the previous quarter is included in the tables which have been placed in the Library.

Some non-resident parents will go to great lengths to avoid fulfilling their responsibilities to their children. The Child Support Agency has made improvements to how it is collecting and enforcing maintenance and is now consistently collecting and arranging record amounts of child maintenance, with over £1.1 billion collected or arranged in the year to the end of December 2008.

I hope you find this answer helpful.

Table A: Maintenance Outcome by Government Office Region and London Local Authority – March 2008

Number

Percentage

None

Full

Over 1-20

Over 20-40

Over 40- 60

Over 60-80

Over 80 to under 100

Agency

276,800

402,500

15,700

20,700

23,300

37,000

48,500

Government Office Region

East Midlands

20,500

29,700

1,000

1,500

1,700

2,800

3,400

Eastern

22,900

33,900

1,100

1,800

1,800

2,900

3,500

London

27,600

31,100

1,400

1,900

2,200

3,200

4,100

North East

17,500

23,700

1,300

1,400

1,700

2,500

3,400

North West

34,500

53,400

2,200

2,700

3,300

5,800

7,500

Scotland

25,500

35,200

1,700

2,100

2,200

3,300

4,700

South East

34,000

54,500

1,700

2,300

2,400

3,900

5,200

South West

23,100

40,400

1,200

1,600

1,800

3,100

3,800

Wales

15,000

24,400

900

1,200

1,400

2,400

3,400

West Midlands

26,000

38,400

1,700

2,200

2,500

3,600

4,600

Yorkshire/Humber

29,100

37,200

1,500

2,100

2,300

3,500

4,600

London local authority

Barking and Dagenham

1,160

1,220

40

60

70

120

160

Barnet

1,000

910

50

50

50

70

120

Bexley

1,070

1,460

40

50

80

110

140

Brent

750

820

30

40

70

90

130

Bromley

920

1260

40

50

80

80

120

Camden

570

590

30

30

30

50

90

City of London

10

10

Croydon

1,770

1,910

110

130

130

200

260

Ealing

970

1,170

50

80

110

180

130

Enfield

1,320

1,260

70

80

100

180

200

Greenwich

1,210

1,220

70

90

100

200

210

Hackney

690

750

50

50

50

110

110

Hammersmith and Fulham

490

440

30

30

50

90

140

Haringey

890

790

50

70

70

70

120

Harrow

510

720

20

50

40

110

40

Havering

750

1,350

30

60

90

50

140

Hillingdon

940

1,140

50

80

70

70

150

Hounslow

840

1,200

40

50

80

110

150

Islington

850

790

30

50

60

90

110

Kensington and Chelsea

320

390

10

20

20

20

60

Kingston upon Thames

320

540

20

30

20

60

50

Lambeth

1,330

1,100

100

90

110

140

200

Lewisham

1,490

1,350

80

140

130

170

150

Merton

660

790

40

70

50

70

100

Newham

950

990

50

70

80

90

140

Redbridge

810

970

40

40

50

90

130

Richmond upon Thames

330

600

30

10

10

20

50

Southwark

1,400

1,350

80

100

110

170

180

Sutton

610

1,030

50

30

50

120

80

Tower Hamlets

700

710

40

50

70

60

90

Waltham Forest

860

1,010

40

60

60

90

210

Wandsworth

740

780

40

80

70

100

110

Westminster

390

500

30

30

40

40

70

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many new applications have been made to the Child Support Agency by (a) parents with care claiming income support and (b) other parents with care in each of the last 24 months. (260115)

The Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission is responsible for the child maintenance system. I have therefore asked the Child Maintenance Commissioner to write to the hon. Member with the information requested.

Letter from Stephen Geraghty:

In reply to your recent Parliamentary Question about the Child Support Agency, the Secretary of State promised a substantive reply from the Child Maintenance Commissioner as the Child Support Agency is now the responsibility of the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission.

You asked the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many new applications have been made to the Child Support Agency by (a) parents with care claiming income support and (b) other parents with care in each of the last 24 months.

Information on the number of applications received each month is routinely published in Table 2.1 of the Child Support Agency Quarterly Summary of Statistics (QSS). The latest copy of which is in the House of Commons library or online at the following link:

http://www.childmaintenance.org/publications/statistics.html

The Child Maintenance and other Payments Act 2008 changed the nature of the relationship between the child maintenance and benefits systems; ending the compulsion on parents with care in receipt of income based benefits to use the Child Support Agency. Prior to 14 July 2008 all parents with care making a new application for either Income Support or income based Jobseekers Allowance were compelled to make an application for child maintenance to the Child Support Agency. The Agency therefore recorded information on new applications distinguishing between those notified by Jobcentre Plus in respect of parents claiming Income Support and Jobseekers Allowance or those which were classed as a ‘private’ application made by either parent without compulsion.

Such information as is available on child maintenance applications by source is provided in the attached table.

Current scheme applications by source of applicationJobcentre Plus applicationsPrivate applicationsJanuary 200719,0005,600February 200727,7005,900March 200721,4005,900April 200716,5005,900 May 200718,8006,000June 200719,6006,400July 200718,6006,100August 200720,3006,400September 200718,6006,400October 200720,3007,100November 200720,9006,100December 200714,1004,000January 200821,3006,900February 200820,5006,500March 200815,7006,000April 200817,8006,700May 200816,2006,300June 200817,4006,700July 200818,5006,700August 200810,6005,900September 20085,1006,800October 20089007,000November 2008—7,300December 2008—5,300 Notes:1. A change in legislation in October 2008 removed the compulsion for parents with care on income based benefit (Income Support or Jobseeker’s Allowance (Income Based)) to pursue a claim for child support through the Agency. After this date, it is expected that some parents with care will opt to end their child support claim with CSA. This can be seen as a fall in overall caseload after October 2008.2. In the run up to the change, a further legislative repeal in July 2008 means that single parents making a new claim for income based benefit will no longer be referred to CSA. Some will make direct arrangements with the Agency, but they are not compelled to do so. This change can be seen as a huge fall (to zero) in the numbers of potential new claims received directly from Jobcentre Plus from October 2008.3. All cases received from October 2008 were classed as private intake. Any cases that were received from this time will be classed as private intake regardless of benefit status.4. Jobcentre Plus applications include all applications originating from Jobcentre Plus where the parent with care is in receipt of Income Support or income based Jobseekers’ Allowance at the time of application. It is not possible to identify those on Income Support separately.