Written Answers to Questions
Wednesday 11 March 2009
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Afghanistan: Detainees
Guidance given to UK intelligence personnel prior to their deployment in respect of (a) the treatment of detainees and (b) reporting procedures in the event of concerns is operational, and for that reason has never been published. The guidance is based on clear principles:
Torture is both abhorrent and illegal, and that the UK should never participate, never encourage and never condone the use of torture.
The UK has obligations under both international and domestic law, including under the Convention Against Torture, and that we should act consistent with those obligations.
The UK makes it clear to our partners that we stand by the above principles.
The written transfer arrangement for Mr. Mohamed’s release and return from Guantanamo Bay, agreed on 20 February 2009, was a private document between the Government and the US Government. It is our long-standing policy not to comment on the detail of operational matters.
Afghanistan: Peacekeeping Operations
The stock-take measured progress in Afghanistan from November 2007 to November 2008. It was intended to inform the Government, as part of the review announced by my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister in the debate on Her Majesty the Queen’s speech in December 2008.
Balkans: EC Enlargement
[holding answer 10 March 2009]: Full details can be found in the 2008 Progress Reports at
http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/how-does-it-work/progress_reports/index_en.htm
All countries included in the enlargement strategy receive funding through the European Commission's Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA). This is due to amount to €7.58 billion overall for the period 2007-11 to support political and economic reform and preparation for EU membership. A breakdown of IPA funding by country is available at the European Commission's Multi-Annual Indicative Financial Frameworks website
http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/dont-miss/index_en.htm
Bosnia and Herzegovina: Office of the High Representative
At the General Affairs and External Relations Council on 23-24 February 2009, there was discussion of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s progress towards meeting the conditions for closure of the Office of the High Representative (OHR). There was no consensus that the conditionality set by the Peace Implementation Council Steering Board in February 2008 had been met. The UK reiterated the importance of adhering to this conditionality, making clear our view that it has not yet been met. Any eventual decision on closure of the OHR will need to be taken by the Peace Implementation Council Steering Board.
Colombia: Armed Conflict
The situation in North East Colombia, particularly in those rural areas bordering Venezuela, is complicated and difficult due to the activities of illegal armed groups.
Foreign and Commonwealth Office Travel Advice for Colombia currently advises against all but essential travel to all rural areas bordering Venezuela, which includes North East Colombia.
Colombia: Land Mines
The UK has provided training to Colombian officers on humanitarian landmine removal. Officials from our Embassy in Bogota maintain regular contact with the Colombian Ministry of Defence to help Colombia fulfil its Ottawa convention responsibilities, and remove the landmines that illegal armed groups continue to use to kill and maim innocent Colombians.
Colombia: Military Aid
[holding answer 9 March 2009]: We monitor civil society, media and UN reports on the Colombian military's human rights performance. UK co-operation with the Colombian Ministry of Defence strongly influenced their new Integral Policy on Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law, and reinforced their work with UN Agencies.
While these new policies are to be welcomed, we are concerned by recent reports of abuses committed or allowed by members of the Colombian army. I issued a statement on the issue on 30 October 2008:
“The Colombian government's decision to dismiss a number of army officers as a result of recent extra-judicial killings and cases of criminal conspiracy is important. It is vital, not least for Colombia's international reputation, that the government and courts continue to show a determination to deal with human rights abuses committed by members of the armed forces, and that those convicted by the civilian justice system are punished appropriately.”
I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave on 12 January 2009, Official Report, column 358W.
The UK requires that Colombian armed forces personnel who undertake UK training courses do not have any formal human rights convictions or pending investigations. The current policy of the Colombian armed forces is that personnel with a formal human rights allegation against their name are suspended and therefore ineligible to receive UK or any other international training.
Cyprus: USA
While our Officials and Ministers maintain regular contact with their US counterparts on Cyprus, my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary has not yet raised Cyprus with his US counterpart.
Democratic Republic of Congo: Politics and Government
The UK is the largest bilateral donor supporting election processes in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). We have committed substantial funding in support of preparations for the local elections, and capacity-building for the Independent Electoral Commission. We have encouraged our international partners to do the same. Our ambassador in Kinshasa is a member of the Elections Steering Committee in the DRC, which met on 24 February 2009. There are currently serious funding gaps for local elections, which the Committee has undertaken to examine in March 2009.
Departmental Compensation
[holding answer 9 March 2009]: The Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme provides benefits to members (UK Civil Servants) who suffer injury, and to the families of those who die while on duty in the UK or overseas. These benefits are provided via two schemes, an injury benefits scheme and a personal injury compensation scheme.
The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) also makes ex-gratia payments to its staff, both UK Civil Servants and locally engaged staff, who suffer injury or death overseas in terrorist attacks as a result of their Crown service.
In addition the FCO reimburses staff for the cost of additional premiums imposed by life insurers because of service in Iraq or Afghanistan.
Departmental Ministerial Policy Advisers
Mr. Ravi Gurumurthy was seconded from the Department for Communities and Local Government on 28 June 2007, and is a strategic adviser and speech co-ordinator for my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary.
Departmental Public Expenditure
I refer the right hon. Member to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office’s (FCO) 2008 autumn performance report published in December 2008, available online at:
http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/about-the-fco/publications/publications/annual-reports/autumn-performance1
This gives the actual efficiency savings, for each efficiency project, for the first six months of 2008-09 and forecast savings for 2009-10 and 2010-11.
The FCO’s departmental report, to be published in June 2009, will provide actual efficiency savings for the whole of 2008-09 and latest forecast savings for 2009-10 and 2010-11.
Embassies: Foreign Workers
Exact details on numbers of locally engaged staff at posts and redundancies are not currently held centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
Overseas Price Mechanism
The Foreign and Commonwealth Office consulted with commercial banks, the Standard Chartered Bank and the Royal Bank of Scotland. We also had discussions with the Bank of England.
We took, and continue to take, advice from independent financial experts HiFX Intelligent Financial Services.
United Nations
[holding answer 4 March 2009]: The main outcome document of the UN Commission on the Status of Women is the agreed conclusions on the equal sharing of responsibilities between women and men, including care giving in the context of HIV/AIDS. This will be disseminated across relevant Government departments. This and all other outcome documents are publicly available on the UN Commission on the Status of Women website at:
http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/csw/agreedconclusions.html
The outcome document of the 42nd Session of the UN Commission on Population and Development will be disseminated to relevant Government departments. This document will be publicly available on the UN Commission on Population and Development website at:
http://www.un.org/esa/population/cpd/cpd2009/comm2009.htm
I will arrange for copies of the Outcome documents of the 53rd Session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women and the 42nd Session of the UN Commission on Population and Development to be placed in the Library of the House.
USA: Foreign Relations
The Foreign and Commonwealth Office Legal Adviser visited the US on 9-10 February 2009 to pursue Government objectives related to the legal aspects of a number of foreign policy matters including in relation to the former Guantanamo Bay detainee, Mr. Binyam Mohamed. He met with officials from the Department of Justice, State Department, White House Counsel, Office of General Counsel, Central Intelligence Agency, the National Security Counsel and Department of Defence.
Treasury
Business: Credit
On 19 January, the Government announced measures designed to reinforce the stability of the financial system, to increase confidence and capacity to lend, and in turn to support the recovery of the economy. Further information is available at:
http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/press_05_09.htm.
These build on measures announced on 8 October last year.
The Government intend to negotiate with the banks participating in certain facilities lending responsibility agreements that will have specific and quantified lending commitments and that will be binding and externally audited.
The Government are taking specific action to meet the needs of small and medium-sized enterprises. On 14 January 2009, the Government announced a package of support to address the cash flow, credit and capital needs of smaller businesses. This package implements and builds upon the commitments the Government made in the 2008 Pre-Budget Report. Details are available at:
http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/realhelp/finance.
The Government meet with a wide range of stakeholders, including representatives of small and medium-sized enterprises. As announced in the 2008 Pre-Budget Report, the Government have established a new lending panel, which will improve monitoring of lending to households and businesses. The work of this panel is supported by the Small Business Finance Forum, established by the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform in November of last year.
The Government will continue to take all necessary measures to ensure the stability of the financial system, ensure lending to the economy, businesses and homeowners, and limit the depth and duration of the current recession and support the subsequent recovery.
Child Tax Credit
For information on HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) processing aims, I refer my hon. Friend to the answer I gave the hon. Member for Northavon (Steve Webb) on 24 February 2009, Official Report, columns 534-36W.
HMRC provides helpful guidance for prospective new claimants on its website at:
www.hmrc.gov.uk/taxcredits/how-to-claim.htm
Tax credits helpline advisers also provide callers with tailored advice to help them complete their claims correctly so that tax credits are paid as quickly as possible.
Departmental Rail Travel
The Treasury’s guidance to staff travelling on official business is that standard class should be used. However, first class travel may be used by staff at all levels where there is a business justification or when travelling at peak or other times when trains are likely to be crowded. In all such cases staff are required to provide an explanation for the use of first class travel when claims are made.
HM Revenue and Customs’ policy is that staff travelling by rail should use standard class. However staff at Grade 7 and above may travel first class if certain conditions apply. All staff may upgrade to first class on the day of travel if no standard class seats are available on the rail journey being taken.
Departmental Training
The Treasury and Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs have no central policy on the holding of away days. The Departments both have a responsibility to provide their staff with the right skills and expertise and use a variety of means to do so.
Equitable Life
The Government intend to set up an ex-gratia payment scheme that can pay out as swiftly as possible, taking account of the practical considerations involved. The Government will work on these practical issues in parallel with the work that they have asked Sir John Chadwick to undertake. Until the work is complete, it will not possible to make an estimate of how long it will take to make payments under the scheme. The Government will keep the House updated and report back on progress at regular intervals.
Excise Duties: Motor Vehicles
The 2008 pre-Budget report announced both standard and first year rates of vehicle excise duty for 2010. Under the standard rates, no driver will pay more than £30 extra in any given band in 2010 compared with 2009 and many will see a reduction of £30.
Under the new first year rates, cars emitting between 100 to 130 grams per kilometre of carbon dioxide will pay no vehicle excise duty in the first year of registration and cars emitting up to 165 grams per kilometre will pay no more than under the standard rate.
Overseas Price Mechanism
The decision to abolish the Overseas Price Mechanism was taken in the autumn of 2007 as part of the broader agreement for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in the 2007 comprehensive spending review. The OPM protected the FCO from currency fluctuations but it did not provide the Department with the incentive to factor in medium-term changes in currency costs when it allocated its resources. As part of the CSR07 agreement, the Treasury allowed the FCO to engage in forward currency markets to better manage short-term currency risk. This change brought the FCO into line with practice in other Government Departments.
Public Works Loan Board
The data are not collated monthly. The annual figures are as follows:
Year ending 31 March (a) Average maturity (b) Modified duration 2000 n/a n/a 2001 21.040 10.710 2002 20.385 10.069 2003 19.647 10.334 2004 19.649 10.452 2005 20.438 10.871 2006 22.408 12.038 2007 27.532 13.113 2008 29.484 14.413
The data are not collated on a monthly basis. The annual figures are:
Year ending 31 March (a) Fixed (percentage) (b) Variable (percentage) 2000 4.625 5.500 2001 4.875 5.563 2002 4.875 4.100 2003 4.434 3.797 2004 4.340 4.209 2005 4.694 4.916 2006 4.190 4.579 2007 4.288 5.507 2008 4.553 5.802
Monthly data are available only at disproportionate cost. The annual figures are as follows:
Year ending 31 March (a) Fixed (b) Variable 2000 6,182.9 788.2 2001 5,005.8 319.4 2002 3,344.9 1,097.4 2003 3,642.8 1,456.4 2004 3,153.4 1,449.8 2005 5,604.9 217.1 2006 8,880.1 71.9 2007 12,277.1 77.2 2008 8,275.7 1.0
Monthly data are available only at disproportionate cost. The annual figures are as follows:
Year ending 31 March Early repayments (£ million) 2000 2,950.0 2001 2,063.4 2002 2,123.6 2003 4,166.0 2004 4,596.9 2005 3,080.7 2006 2,501.4 2007 10,698.5 2008 6,433.6
Defence
Apprentices
As part of the requirement for the Defence Training Review (DTR) Package 1, Metrix will transform and modernise existing training, which will involve the re-accreditation of any transformed modules. This re-accreditation will be led by Nord Anglia, the Open university and City and Guilds, who are all respected and leading accreditation specialists. For the Defence College of Aeronautical Engineering, and all the technical training under Package 1, any existing accreditation will remain in place until a re-designed package is approved by the Ministry of Defence, which includes any proposals for changes to apprenticeship training.
All Defence training (including accreditation implications) must adhere to a robust and established change process under the Defence systems approach to training to approve any change, and meet stringent defence and Government policy guidelines. The Department is recognised as an example of good practice with respect to apprenticeships and remains committed to maintaining this reputation.
Armed Forces: Manpower
As I set out in my answer of 15 May 2008, Official Report, columns 1704-05W, and 26 November 2008, Official Report, columns 1521-26W, some of the information requested is not available; this position remains the case. I have provided as much information as possible for the Royal Navy and the Royal Air Force although it is not possible to provide inflow rates for the Royal Navy pinch points due to the configuration of the pinch point trades on the joint personnel administration (JPA) system. The Army is currently not able to provide any data of this kind as the information held on JPA has not been validated.
Liability Strength Shortfall Inflow Outflow VO Operational pinch point trades Number Number Number Percentage Number Number Percentage Lt Cdr X SM Command Qualified (SM(CQ)) 47 45 2 5 n/a 3 0 Lt X SM IWC Qualified and SQEP 40 39 1 3 n/a 16 7.5 Principal Warfare Officers 359 289 70 20 n/a 38 4.0 RN Harrier GR7 Instructors 7 3 4 57 n/a 1 0 GR7 Harrier Pilots: Lt 35 21 14 40 n/a 0 4.0 MCD/MWO Lts 81 47 34 43 n/a 7 3.8 Strategic Weapons Systems Junior Ranks 110 86 24 22 n/a 22 5.0 Merlin Pilots 122 78 44 36 n/a 7 2.5 Merlin Observers 116 71 45 39 n/a 1 1.5 Merlin Aircrewmen 103 80 23 22 n/a 10 14.6 Leading Seaman General Warfare 1,105 815 290 26 n/a 106 8.3 Able Rate Diver 135 95 40 30 n/a 12 10.0 Lt X SM Advanced Warfare Course Qualified (SQEP) 34 30 4 12 n/a 16 4.0 Able Rate 1 Seaman 388 291 97 25 n/a 74 16.0 Able Rate 1 Warfare Specialist 666 635 31 5 n/a 173 13.0 Able Rate 1 Communications and Information Systems 367 335 32 9 n/a 77 16.0 Leading Aircraft Controllers 73 41 32 44 n/a 5 6.5 Royal Marines Other Ranks (Pt—Cp1) 6,525 6,003 522 8 n/a 484 7.3 Able Rate Warfare Specialist (Sensors Submariner) 178 144 34 17 n/a 30 6.0 Sea-King and Lynx Avionics Supervisors 348 284 64 18 n/a 3 n/a Cat A2 Nuclear Watchkeepers 189 157 32 17 n/a 12 6.0 Cat B Nuclear Watchkeepers 377 316 61 16 n/a 44 6.0 L Logs(CS) (P) 328 261 67 25 n/a 27 2.0 AB Logs (CS) (P) 456 447 9 2 n/a 48 6.0 L Logs (Pers) 239 222 17 7 n/a 26 4.0 AB Logs (Pers) 392 391 1 0 n/a 49 9.0 LS (MW) 70 65 5 8 n/a 3 6.0 Able Rate Warfare Specialist (Tactical Submariner) 124 116 8 7 n/a 13 7.0 Notes: 1. Outflow is to January 2009. 2. Lt X SM IWC Qualified and SQEP and Lt X SM Advanced Warfare Course Qualified (SQEP) are the same group and are 16 in total but they are two separate OPPs. 3. SQEP means Suitably Qualified and Experience Personnel, i.e. have the skills to do a particular job and in case of SM if AWC are qualified to be a Watch Leader
Liability Strength Shortfall Inflow Outflow VO Number Number Number Percentage Number Number Number Operational pinch point trades RE Clk of Wks: SSgt-WO1 248 237 11 4.4 n/a n/a n/a RLC Ammo Tech: Cp1-SSgt 306 176 130 42.5 n/a n/a n/a Infantry: Pte-LCp1 14,980 13,380 1,600 10.7 n/a n/a n/a REME Rec Mech: LCp1-Cp1 339 213 126 37.2 n/a n/a n/a RE EOD: Cp1-SSgt 131 109 22 16.7 n/a n/a n/a REME VM: Cfh-Cp1 3,521 3,224 297 8.4 n/a n/a n/a Int OPMI:Cp1-Sgt 708 476 232 32.8 n/a n/a n/a REME Armourer: Cfn-Cp1 377 305 74 19.6 n/a n/a n/a RA Gunner: Gnr-Bdr (including Para/Cdo Gnrs and OP Asst) 4,987 4,490 497 10.0 n/a n/a n/a Manning pinch point trades AMS Radiologist: Maj+ 4 2 2 50.0 n/a n/a n/a AMS ITU Nurse: Cp1-Capt 121 35 86 71.1 n/a n/a n/a AMS EM Nurse: Cp1-Capt 101 38 63 62.4 n/a n/a n/a AMS Radiographer: Cp1+ 24 12 12 50.0 n/a n/a n/a AMS Anaesthetist: Maj+ 49 23 26 53.1 n/a n/a n/a AMS Orth Surg: Maj+ 13 10 3 23.1 n/a n/a n/a AMS Gen Surg: Maj+ 17 10 7 41.2 n/a n/a n/a REME Geo: Spr-WO2 365 284 81 22.2 n/a n/a n/a RLC P&C Op: Pte-Cp1 433 435 -2 -0.5 n/a n/a n/a RA UAV Op: LBdr-SSgt 370 299 71 19.2 n/a n/a n/a REME Fitter: Spr-LCp1 495 409 86 17.4 n/a n/a n/a AGC(SPS) Mil Admin: Pte-Sgt 2,666 2,292 374 14.0 n/a n/a n/a AMS GMP: Capt+ 155 137 18 11.6 n/a n/a n/a R Signals IS Engr: Cp1-Sgt 252 124 128 50.8 n/a n/a n/a CAMUS: Musician 300 199 101 33.7 n/a n/a n/a AMS ODP: Cp1+ 95 81 14 14.7 n/a n/a n/a AMS RGN: Cp1-Sgt 293 263 30 10.2 n/a n/a n/a REME C3S: Spr-LCp1 712 611 101 14.2 n/a n/a n/a RLC Chef: Pte-LCp1 1,459 1,383 76 5.2 n/a n/a n/a
Liability Strength Shortfall Inflow Outflow VO Number Number Number Percentage Number Number Number Operational pinch point trades Flying Branch (Career Stream) (Senior Officer) 677 576 101 15 100 70 20 Pilot (Junior Officer) 1,490 1,288 202 14 160 150 40 Operations Support (Intelligence) 229 224 5 2 10 20 10 Operations Support (Regiment) 275 235 40 14 30 20 10 Operations Support (Flight Operations) 224 219 5 2 20 — — Medical 282 213 69 24 — 10 — Medical Nursing Officer 179 128 51 28 10 20 10 Weapons System (Operator (Crewman) 577 503 74 13 70 30 10 Weapons System Operator (Linguist) 63 50 13 21 10 10 — Mechanical Transport Technician 355 342 13 4 — 30 20 Gunner 1,924 1,702 222 11 330 190 110 Fire Fighter 545 518 27 5 110 60 20 Air Traffic Control/Flight Operations Manager/Flight Operations Assistant 1,246 1,228 18 1 110 80 40 Logistics (Mover) 895 849 46 5 50 70 50 Manning pinch point trades Weapons System Officer (Junior Officer) 513 439 74 14 10 30 10 Operations Support (Aerospace Battle Manager) 342 293 49 14 10 20 10 Operations Support (Air Traffic Control) 397 371 26 6 20 30 10 Personnel (Support) 521 494 27 5 50 40 20 Personnel (Training) 219 198 21 10 10 20 10 Dental 71 57 14 20 — 10 — Chaplains 78 63 15 19 — 10 — Aircraft Technician (Mechanical) 4,965 4,299 666 13 10 290 200 Aircraft Technician (Avionics) 3,942 3,437 505 13 10 260 180 General Technician (Electrical) 551 491 60 11 20 70 40 General Technician (Mechanical) 963 436 527 75 20 30 20 Intelligence (Analyst) 679 590 89 13 40 30 20 Survival Equipment Fitter 607 562 45 7 30 80 40 Biomedical Scientist 15 9 6 40 0 — — Dental Nurse 131 122 9 7 20 10 10 Musician 175 152 23 13 10 10 — Notes 1. Inflow equals all inflow, trained or untrained, to pinch point trades during the 12-month period 1 November 2007 to 30 November 2008. When the pinch point applies to a specific rank (Senior Officer/Junior Officer) promotions and demotions have been included. 2. Outflow equals all trained outflow from pinch point trades during the 12-month period 1 November 2007 to 30 November 2008. When the pinch point applies to a specific rank (Senior Officer/Junior Officer) promotions and demotions have been included. 3. WSO includes Navigators, Crewman, Electronic Warfare/Acoustic, Linguist and Air Eng. 4. Due to the small populations generated by this level of detail, and the possibility of identifying individual personnel, data have been rounded to 10 and totals may not always equal the sum of the parts. When rounding to the nearest 10, numbers ending in 5 have been rounded to the nearest multiple of 20 to prevent systematic bias. “0” represents zero occurrences and “—” shows rounded to zero. 5. Due to the introduction of the new pay administration system these data are provisional and subject to review.
Armed Forces: Parades
Military tattoos take place in a number of towns and cities across the UK and are generally organised on a commercial basis, although most are set up and run for charitable purposes.
The major tattoos that the services plan to support this year (as in previous years) include the Edinburgh Military Tattoo and the Windsor Castle Royal Tattoo and the Royal International Air Tattoo (held at RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire). Units from the army supported the first Windsor Castle Royal Tattoo last year and it is planned to widen participation this year to include elements from the RN and RAF as well. Other tattoos, such as Birmingham, Aldershot and Durham, have also been supported by military assets in recent years and it is understood that the City of Cardiff are seeking to introduce a Cardiff tattoo in the coming years.
Armed Forces: Training
All of the training in the scope of the Defence Training Review Package 1 will, by 2020, be delivered at St. Athan, with the exception of Royal Naval Communications training at HMS Collingwood which amounts to 2 per cent. of the total training requirement. In addition, about 30 per cent. of phase 3 (professional) training will be delivered away from St. Athan at remote learning centres around the UK to enable personnel to stay near home bases and families.
Departmental Absenteeism
This information is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Departmental Data Protection
The Ministry of Defence has identified eight contracts where personal data of UK citizens are held overseas. The following table provides the name of the contract, the country where the data are held and the approximate number of records.
Name of contract Where the data are held Approximate number of personal records held Defence Travel: Electronic Booking Interface Service Contract France 160,500 USA 15,000 Defence Travel: Travel Management Contract USA 310,000 Royal Navy Community Website USA 9,000 E-bluey: a hybrid mail service for BFPO which allows service personnel, relatives and friends to maintain contact with each other while serving on operations or exercise for more than 60 days duration USA 1150,000 External Band D Assessment Centre (CMS) Australia 4,600 RAF Fitlinxx: provides fitness training programmes for personnel and records workout sessions USA 8,060 DE&S Movement Management Air Reservation System Germany 19,500 DE&S Departure Control System Germany 4,000 1 Including live accounts and e-blueys. This number fluctuates on a daily basis as accounts are added and deleted.
Met Office
Officials from the Ministry of Defence and Treasury were represented on the Trading Funds Assessment Steering Group. As announced in the pre-Budget report the Met Office is now being examined as part of the Government’s Operational Efficiency Programme and officials from both Departments are meeting regularly to take this forward.
Naval Bases[Official Report, 20 April 2009, Vol. 491, c. 1-2MC.]
(2) what the monetary value of surface ship refitting contracts was at HM Naval Base Plymouth Devonport in each year since 1997;
(3) what the monetary value of surface ship refitting contracts was at HM Naval Base Rosyth in each year since 1997.
There is no requirement to keep contractual information for surface ship upkeep work (refits and docking periods) beyond seven years. The values of contracts completed prior to 2001 are, therefore, no longer held. The following table provides the costs for upkeep work carried out since 2001 on Aircraft Carriers, Type 42 Destroyers, Type 22 and 23 Frigates, Landing Platform Dock, Royal Fleet Auxiliary and Mine Countermeasure vessels:
Location Portsmouth Devonport Rosyth 2001 8.9 10.3 126.2 2002 6.0 37.1 46.0 2003 23.9 5.6 35.9 2004 56.6 6.6 158.7 2005 11.5 0.0 56.3 2006 8.7 17.5 25.1 2007 27.8 37.0 21.0 2008 24.0 26.0 41.1
The figures shown for years 2001 and 2004 include upkeep work packages for the aircraft carriers HM Ships Invincible and Illustrious.
(2) what recent assessment he has made of the (a) capacity and (b) capabilities of (i) HM Naval Base Plymouth Devonport and (ii) HM Naval Base Portsmouth in respect of surface ships.
The capacity and capability of all three UK naval bases (Clyde, Devonport and Portsmouth) are regularly assessed to ensure that they individually and collectively meet the requirements of the Royal Navy. The most recent assessment was carried out as part of the Naval Base Review (NBR), which concluded in July 2007 that all three naval bases should be retained but optimised. This optimisation work has begun at each naval base and forms an integral part of the Maritime Change Programme (MCP). MCP is developing an enduring maritime enterprise, commensurate with the Defence Industrial Strategy (DIS), that delivers affordable, sustainable and efficient Maritime build, equipment and through life support to meet the operational needs of the Royal Navy today and in the future.
Navy: Contracts
The MOD’s regular planning round is currently in progress. Until this work has been completed, it is not possible to provide a cost estimate for future Royal Navy surface ship upkeeps.
Programme Belvedere
(2) what estimate he has made of the cost to date of Programme Belvedere;
(3) what the reasons are for the time taken to announce the outcome of Programme Belvedere;
(4) what criteria will be used in selecting an airfield for Joint Helicopter Command under Programme Belvedere;
(5) who in his Department has lead responsibility for Programme Belvedere;
(6) who in his Department is responsible for ensuring that Programme Belvedere adheres to its timetable;
(7) how long he expects production of the environmental impact assessment on the airfield to be selected for Joint Helicopter Command under Programme Belvedere to take;
(8) how long he expects the process of costing the outcome selected by Programme Belvedere to take.
The Belvedere Programme is considering future basing options for the Joint Helicopter Command.
Under the strategic direction of the Defence Operating Board and a three Star military officer (the Senior Responsible Owner), the Belvedere Team Leader has day to day responsibility for the programme timetable.
The range of variables and programme uncertainties has been more complex than originally envisaged, and has inevitably had an impact on the time taken to undertake the work. The criteria against which judgments are made, for both individual airfields and combinations of airfields, include:
operating issues including aircraft numbers, command and control and flying hours; environmental issues including noise,
availability and standard of domestic and technical accommodation;
accessibility for aircraft and vehicle types; aircraft capacity of the airfield;
opportunities for efficiencies and rationalisation;
airfield location—low flying areas, training areas and local communities;
future requirements; and,
affordability and value for money.
The costs of Belvedere since it was reconstituted in June 2007 have been a little under £2 million. In addition, around £2 million has been spent on essential maintenance works at RAF Lyneham to ensure that its existing infrastructure can remain viable if Belvedere concludes that the station should be retained.
No decisions have been taken on the number of bases required, nor therefore, of any accommodation requirements at RAF Lyneham. Any new accommodation would be provided to common joint-Service standards.
Baseline noise and environmental impact assessments have been made for each of the sites being considered by Programme Belvedere. A full environmental assessment following selection of a particular option would take 11-12 months. The programme would then be delivered through a series of individual projects. Future costs would depend upon the option chosen.
The future of the Belvedere Programme is currently under consideration at senior levels within the Department.
Royal Regiment of Scotland: Manpower
Fit for duty has been interpreted as medically fit to perform any duty. Personnel unfit for duty in their primary role but who can perform a role in an alternative capacity are therefore included in the following tables.
As at 1 December 2008, the figures for Royal Regiment of Scotland regular battalions were:
Battalion Trained strength Actual strength Fit for duty 1 Scots 627 554 552 2 Scots 574 476 472 3 Scots 629 575 573 4 Scots 762 588 560 5 Scots 654 561 548
As at 1 January 2009, the figures for Royal Regiment of Scotland Territorial Army battalions were:
Battalion Trained strength Actual strength Fit for duty 6 Scots 430 270 n/a 7 Scots 530 390 n/a
Data concerning fit for duty personnel are not collected for the Territorial Army and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Shareholder Executive
Officials from the Ministry of Defence worked very closely with the Shareholder Executive on the Trading Funds Assessment.
Ministry of Defence officials with responsibility for the Department’s Trading Funds were represented on the Trading Funds Assessment Steering Group. There were discussions on the Assessment between officials and Shareholder Executive officials and MOD Ministers.
Trading Funds
Ministry of Defence officials with responsibility for the Department’s Trading Funds were represented on the Trading Funds Assessment Steering Group alongside officials from other Trading Fund owner Departments, HM Treasury, the Office of Fair Trading and the Office of Public Sector Information.
Written Questions: Government Responses
I replied to the hon. Member today.
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Agriculture: Subsidies
[holding answer 9 March 2009]: Commission Regulation 800/1999, which came into force on 15 April 1999, currently governs export refunds within the common agricultural policy. Since this date, the following number of applications for export refund have been made in the UK.
Sector Refund applications Pigmeat 4,174 Eggs 1,895 Poultry 7,619 Beef and Veal 11 Milk and Milk products 76,782
Animal Welfare
[holding answer 10 March 2009]: The welfare of all farmed animals is protected by the Animal Welfare Act 2006, which makes it an offence to cause unnecessary suffering to any animal. The Act also contains a Duty of Care to animals—this means that anyone responsible for an animal must take reasonable steps to make sure the animal’s needs are met. The Act is backed up by detailed regulations for farmed animals and species-specific welfare codes.
Animal Health carries out welfare inspections on farms to check that legislation and the welfare codes are being followed. In addition to spot checks and planned visits, Animal Health follows up all complaints and allegations of poor welfare on specific farms as a matter of urgency. In 2008, Animal Health carried out a total of 10,159 animal welfare inspections on farms.
Beekeeping
[holding answer 9 March 2009]: Recreational beekeepers, who form a substantial majority of beekeepers in the UK, play an important role in helping to combat the decline in the honey bee population, both in terms of ensuring that they practice good husbandry to maintain and increase bee numbers, and through recognising the risks of spreading pests and diseases to other beekeepers if they fail to take action. The recent National Audit Office report highlighted the large numbers of recreational beekeepers who are unknown to the authorities and so who could be unaware of the risks of spread of pests and disease. An additional £2.3 million funding was announced by the Secretary of State in January to support implementation of the initial phase of a 10 year plan to protect and improve the health of honey bees. This involves new work aimed at gaining a more accurate picture of the numbers and distribution of beekeepers and the status of the health of their colonies and increasing significantly the proportion of beekeepers registered on the National Bee Unit’s Beebase database in England.
Bees: Disease Control
[holding answer 9 March 2009]: There have been no discussions in recent years at a ministerial level on the problems affecting bee health. At official level DEFRA is working closely with other EU member states and has been in regular contact with our United States counterparts about colony collapse disorder. Members of the National Bee Unit are involved in an EU Consortium of Bee Researchers, COLOSS, which has been established to facilitate the exchange of information about abnormal colony losses and a project funded by the European Food Standards Agency which is collecting data from bee surveillance programmes currently run by EU member states.
[holding answer 9 March 2009]: Negotiations with other potential funders are still continuing but we hope to conclude these in the next few weeks. Details of the programme will be published on the DEFRA website once these have been finalised.
[holding answer 9 March 2009]: International trade in honeybees poses a risk of movements of pests and diseases. Consequently, imports are only allowed from a limited list of non-EC countries. Imports of honeybees into the UK are controlled by EC legislation which includes a requirement for each consignment to be accompanied by a health certificate issued by the relevant authorities in the exporting country. Imports from countries outside the Community are also subject to post import controls aimed at reducing the risk of introduction and spread of exotic bee pests, in particular, the small hive beetle and tropilaelaps mites, both of which are notifiable.
[holding answer 9 March 2009]: The information is not available in the form requested. Depending on the project, bee health research can involve any of the staff in the National Bee Unit, the bee inspectors and a range of researchers from various other disciplines within the Central Science Laboratory.
[holding answer 9 March 2009]: The number of seasonal bee inspectors employed by the National Bee Unit in each year since 1998 is set out in the following table:
Number 1998 34 1999 38 2000 39 2001 39 2002 38 2003 39 2004 36 2005 36 2006 36 2007 36 2008 36
Departmental Data Protection
No DEFRA employees have been (a) investigated, (b) suspended, or (c) dismissed for losing (i) memory sticks, (ii) laptop computers, (iii) desktop computers, and (iv) mobile telephones belonging to the Department.
Departmental Disciplinary Proceedings
Seven employees have been disciplined for bullying and harassment in the last three years. One employee was disciplined in 2007, five employees were disciplined in 2008, and one employee has been disciplined in 2009.
DEFRA'S procedures do not differentiate between bullying and harassment so I am unable to provide a further breakdown.
Departmental Postal Services
From information held centrally, the core-Department has not used any postal service provider other than Royal Mail in the last 12 months. For the period 1 February 2008 to 28 February 2009 inclusive, the core-Department gave the Royal Mail 2,037,695 letters.
Domestic Waste: Waste Disposal
DEFRA has no plans to run weekly collection pilots.
Food Supply: Research
[holding answer 23 February 2009]: Between 2005-09, DEFRA has invested in research activities associated with UK food security. Industry have joint funded some of the work within the LINK programme. The LINK Programme is a co-ordinated research and innovation framework programme funded in equal share (50:50) by DEFRA and industry. Its aim is to develop near-market products and practices, for subsequent progression to the market place under full industry funding.
Total spend for each of the last four years is shown in the following table:
Programme Sustainable farming and food Animal health and welfare 2005-06 38.0 40.0 2006-07 34.0 41.0 2007-08 29.0 39.0 2008-09 28.0 36.4 1 These figures are taken from the DEFRA Science Information System database.
Incinerators: Health Hazards
[holding answer 12 February 2009]: Monitoring data on certain heavy metals, loss on ignition (the change in weight recorded when the ash is heated to a high temperature) and the total organic carbon in incinerator bottom ash is provided by the incinerator operators. This is placed upon the Environment Agency public registers. These data are checked by the Environment Agency upon receipt. Limits are set on loss on ignition/total organic carbon to ensure that the incinerator is operating efficiently. No breaches of these limits have been reported hence no enforcement action has been taken. Limits are not set on the heavy metal content of the ash as a permit condition. The operator is expected to carry out more detailed analysis before the ash can be disposed of.
[holding answer 12 February 2009]: Incinerator bottom ash is not tested directly for ecotoxicity as this would involve unnecessary expense and unwarranted animal testing. Instead, chemical analysis is undertaken using standard methods and the ash is assessed for ecotoxicity by reference to the criteria for levels of dangerous substances given in the Environment Agency’s Technical Guidance WM2 “Hazardous waste: interpretation of the definition and classification of hazardous waste, 2nd edition, version 2.2”. The Environment Agency has been working with the Environmental Services Association to ensure that the procedures used to assess incinerator bottom ash are both robust and technically appropriate.
Insulation: Hazardous Substances
Ozone depleting substances are recovered from insulation foams in refrigerators, freezers and other equipment in specialist facilities. A small amount of insulation foam arising as construction waste is also treated in some of these plants but the quantity is unknown.
Annual reports on the tonnages of all ozone depleting substances recovered in the UK, including refrigerant fluids and halons from fire extinguishers, are provided to the EU but the Environment Agency does not hold information on the amounts derived from individual sources. Data are not yet available for 2008.
The National Enforcement Database is the main recording system for data on enforcement actions carried out by the Environment Agency. The database does not provide specific information regarding offences relating to the disposal of plastic foam insulation.
The Environment Agency takes enforcement action where necessary against people who have operated illegal transfer stations, unlicensed landfills for construction/demolition waste and those who have fly-tipped this type of waste.
Landfill Tax
(2) whether it is Government policy that increases in landfill tax rates will be revenue-neutral for local authorities;
(3) if he will bring forward proposals to adjust local authority funding in line with changes to the rate of landfill tax in order to fund extensions to recycling services;
(4) what percentage of revenue raised through the landfill tax was reallocated directly to local authorities in each of the last five years.
[holding answers 3 March and 6 March 2009]: The Government worked closely with local government in CSR07 to identify the overall pressure on waste management services, including the increase in landfill tax, along with the extent to which those pressures can be mitigated. Over the CSR07 period, the overall Government grant will increase by £8.9 billion which takes into account local government’s landfill tax liability, including the increased costs resulting from the rise in the standard rate escalator from 2008-09, and allows local authorities to deliver effective services including in the area of waste management.
DEFRA is also supporting local authorities to develop alternatives to landfill through the Private Finance Initiative (PFI). To date £2.02 billion PFI Credits have been committed to 33 projects which will divert waste from landfill. There are a further 11 projects in the application process, for the remaining £1.18 billion PFI Credits currently available.
In addition the Waste Infrastructure Capital Grant provides direct funding to help local authorities put in place the front-end infrastructure needed to help them meet their landfill diversion targets.
Milk: Imports
[holding answer 6 March 2009]: Liquid milk imports are shown in the following table. Liquid milk is imported into the UK in two forms, as raw milk for processing by dairies in the UK, or as liquid drinking milk (e.g. pasteurised or UHT milk).
Most imports of raw milk come from the Republic of Ireland for processing by dairies in Northern Ireland.
million litres Raw milk for processing Liquid drinking milk 1997 128 150 2000 97 122 2008 30 100 Source: DARDNI, HMRC
National Parks: South Downs
DEFRA has received around 17,500 postcards supporting the proposed South Downs National Park since 1 December 2008.
Pollution: Hertfordshire
The following table indicates the number of successful prosecutions undertaken by the Environment Agency concerning pollution incidents in Hertfordshire.
This information was taken from the National Enforcement Database which is the main recording system for data on enforcement actions carried out by the Environment Agency. The database does not provide information regarding offences in individual boroughs.
Successful prosecutions 20021 11 2003 9 2004 16 2005 4 2006 5 2007 30 2008 9 20092 2 1 From 6 February. 2 To date.
The following table shows the number of complaints received by the Environment Agency concerning pollution incidents in Hertfordshire and Dacorum.
Incidents Hertfordshire Dacorum Complaints 20021 471 35 534 2003 304 57 561 2004 432 39 516 2005 240 36 682 2006 390 46 472 2007 367 28 589 2008 365 29 488 2009 39 0 54 1 From 6 February.
The Environment Agency may receive multiple complaints about one incident.
Records of complaints received by the Environment Agency which prove to unjustified are only retained for two years.
Recycling
[holding answer 6 March 2009]: DEFRA launched ‘Recycle on the Go’ on 2 June 2008 which aims to put accessible recycling bins in public places. A good practice guide and a voluntary code of practice is available to help those responsible for public places to make recycling easy and accessible and includes guidance on providing recycling opportunities along with provisions for the correct disposal of non-recyclable waste.
The materials, which were developed in collaboration with the Waste and Resources Action Programme (WRAP) and ENCAMS, are available on the DEFRA website at:
http://defraweb/environment/waste/recycleonthego/index.htm
WRAP’s Recycle Now campaign has published guidelines for local authorities on how to make good use of the signage for recycle bins, including up-to-date brand guidelines for ‘Recycle on the Go’. This, as well as artwork for bins and campaigning, can be downloaded from the Recycle Now website at:
http://www.recyclenowpartners.org.uk/local_authorities/download_area/recycle_on_the_go/index.rma
[holding answer 6 March 2009]: Neither DEFRA nor the Waste and Resources Action Programme hold the information requested.
Recycling: Hampshire
[holding answer 4 March 2009]: DEFRA officials have received briefings from the Environment Agency about reports of exports of waste electrical and electronic equipment from various sources to African countries. The Environment Agency is undertaking further investigations into alleged breaches of the waste shipment controls. It is not appropriate to comment on any specific investigations while they are ongoing.
The illegal export of waste is completely unacceptable and that is why DEFRA has provided funding to the Environment Agency to step up its enforcement efforts to deter this activity and catch those responsible. The rules are clear—the export of scrap TVs or scrap computer monitors to Africa is illegal. Such activity is not only potentially harmful to the environment but it also undermines the good work of legitimate charities which provide working electrical equipment to communities in developing countries.
Trade Unions
Trade unions recognised within the Department are PCS, Prospect and the FDA.
Water: Meters
The following table sets out the number of water meters that have been installed in houses in England and Wales since 1997. Ofwat, the economic regulator of the water and sewerage industry, does not hold data on how many meters are installed in individual constituencies.
Three Valleys Water figures are included as this company provides a water service to the constituency of Hemel Hempstead.
Because of water company supply boundaries it is not possible to separate out the number of meters installed in England alone.
Total in England and Wales Three Valleys Water 1997-98 559,156 15,183 1998-99 486,043 27,291 1999-2000 352,997 16,305 2000-01 233,487 11,033 2001-02 241,108 10,111 2002-03 236,361 16,555 2003-04 295,053 27,231 2004-05 261,982 21,163 2005-06 325,756 38,965
Western Sahara: Fisheries
UK vessels that fish in the waters off Western Sahara and Morocco do so under the provisions of the EU/Morocco Fisheries Partnership Agreement. DEFRA advises that they should ensure compliance with the agreement at all times while fishing in these waters.
Olympics
Departmental Postal Services
The Department for Culture, Media and Sport does not record the number of mail items sent by individual Ministers or their offices. 100 per cent. of mail items sent by the Department are given to the Royal Mail.
Scotland
Departmental Ministerial Policy Advisers
Costs incurred on reimbursable expenses in 2008-09, will be available only when the Department’s resource accounts are fully audited and laid before Parliament. This is expected to be before the 2009 summer recess.
Wales
Devolution
The Government’s position on the devolution settlement for Wales is clearly set out in the 2006 Government of Wales Act. The Act has delivered on clearer responsibilities, fairer Assembly elections, simplified legislative process and enhanced powers in agreed matters. The powers conferred on the National Assembly and the Welsh Assembly Government are working well.
Welsh Economy
I have regular discussions with ministerial colleagues and the Welsh Assembly Government on the state of the Welsh economy, through my membership of the National Economic Council and my attendance at the all-Wales economic summits.
Working in close partnership, the UK Government and the Welsh Assembly Government are doing all we can to help Welsh businesses and households through these challenging times.
Prisons: Drugs
My right hon. Friend and I have regular discussions with ministerial colleagues and Welsh Ministers on a range of issues affecting Wales including prisons.
Since 1997, we have increased investment in drug treatment in prisons tenfold and greatly strengthened enforcement. As a result of this, results in mandatory random drug tests have improved from over 20 per cent. testing positive 10 years ago to 9 per cent. now.
Digital Inclusion
My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State launched ‘Delivering Digital Inclusion: an Action Plan for Consultation’ in October 2008, setting out over 70 actions taking place across Government to tackle digital inclusion.
The consultation has now finished and the responses are currently being analysed to inform further progress. My right hon. Friend will be making an announcement in the spring on the outcome of the consultation and the appointment of a digital inclusion champion and taskforce.
Flooding: Severn Plain
My right hon. Friend has regular bi-lateral meetings with the First Minister on a range of issues including environmental matters.
The Assembly Government takes flooding in Wales very seriously. It has more than doubled funding since 1999 with £5.8 million per year for local authorities and over £12 million for the Environment Agency Wales for capital improvement projects.
The Assembly Government also secured an additional £30 million from convergence funding to invest in flood and coastal erosion risk measures across Wales, £8 million for flood risk management activities and £575,000 available to the Environment Agency Wales between 2009 and 2011 to take forward a number of initiatives.
Welsh Language
I have regular meetings with Welsh Assembly Government colleagues to discuss matters relating to Wales including the promotion of the Welsh language.
Hon. Members will be aware that my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State laid the proposed Welsh Language Legislative Competence Order in Parliament on 9 February for pre-legislative scrutiny. The proposed LCO, when made, will enable the National Assembly to legislate in order to deliver the Welsh Assembly Government's commitments in respect of the language.
Christmas
The Wales Office has no policy entitling staff to either (a) additional leave for Christmas shopping or (b) Christmas bonus payments.
Departmental Ministerial Policy Advisers
Costs incurred on reimbursable expenses in 2008-09, will be available only when the Department's resource accounts are fully audited and laid before Parliament. This is expected to be before the 2009 summer recess.
Transport
A15
[holding answer 10 March 2009]: The Department for Transport has not received any proposals to dual the A15 in the last 12 months.
BAA
Since January 2006, Ministers have met regularly with BAA to discuss general aviation issues. These meetings covered a wide range of topics, which may have included the expansion of Heathrow.
Date (week commencing) Minister 6 March 2006 Alistair Darling 22 May 2006 Douglas Alexander 29 January 2007 Douglas Alexander 5 March 2007 Douglas Alexander 14 May 2007 Douglas Alexander 18 June 2007 Douglas Alexander 10 September 2007 Jim Fitzpatrick 7 April 2008 Ruth Kelly 28 April 2008 Ruth Kelly 21 July 2008 Ruth Kelly 1 September 2008 Ruth Kelly
In addition to these meetings, there were other occasions on which Ministers met with BAA to discuss issues such as airport security or surface access; or to discuss airports other than Heathrow.
Due to IT changes, officials' diaries are not available before April 2008, or July 2008 in some cases. Meetings with BAA have taken place as follows:
Date Officials 9 April 2008 John Parkinson (Head of Airports Policy, DFT) and Martin Jones (Head of Strategic Roads) 3 July 2008 Jonathan Moor (Director of Airports Strategy, DFT) and John Parkinson 17 July 2008 Jonathan Moor and John Parkinson 22 July 2008 Quarterly meeting with BAA, attended by Simon Webb (Director General of Internal Networks and Environment, DFT) and Jonathan Moor 26 August 2008 Jonathan Moor and John Parkinson 3 September 2008 Simon Webb and Jonathan Moor 18 September 2008 Jonathan Moor and John Parkinson 3 October 2008 Quarterly meeting with BAA, attended by Simon Webb and Jonathan Moor 6 November 2008 Jonathan Moor and John Parkinson 14 November 2008 Jonathan Moor and David Hart (Head of International Networks Analysis and Support) 24 November 2008 Jonathan Moor and John Parkinson
Again, these meetings covered a wide variety of topics, which may have included the expansion of Heathrow.
Note that officials and ministers have met with BAA following the closure of the Heathrow consultation; but none of these meetings have discussed Heathrow.
Departmental Postal Services
The information requested is in the following table.
DFT organisational unit Items Percentage Items Percentage Central Department: London HQ1 87,694 97 2,758 3 Air Accidents Investigation Branch2 2— 100 2— 0 Marine Accident Investigation Branch 2— 99 2— 1 Rail Accident Investigation Branch1 3,372 98.80 40 1.20 Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency3 108,767,612 100 3— 3— Driving Standards Agency4 4— 99 4— 1 Government Car and Despatch Agency5 2— 100 0 0 Highways Agency5 5— 599 5— 51 Maritime and Coastguard Agency6 6— 6— 6— 6— Vehicle and Operator Services Agency2 2— 100 2— 0 Vehicle Certification Agency2 2— 99 2— 1 1 Includes letters and other articles (parcels, packets etc) transmitted by post. 2 No record kept of number of items sent. 3 100 per cent. of the mail despatched to the public is sent via Royal Mail. The only other provider is Secure Mail Services which is used to securely transport mail internally to local office. 4 The requested information can be provided only at disproportionate cost. However, DSA estimates that around 99 per cent. of its letters are given to Royal Mail for delivery. 5 The Highways Agency does not maintain number counts for the posting of letters. Above is an estimate. 6 The Information requested is not collected in the format requested. Cost analysis would not reflect numbers and/or percentage as the cost element is not fixed between couriers.
Departmental Press
The Department for Transport was formed in May 2002. Total payments coded as expenditure for magazines, newspapers and other publications in the Department's accounting systems since this date are recorded as follows:
£ 2002-03 155,654 2003-04 84,884 2004-05 68,447 2005-06 553,881 2006-07 277,389 2007-08 302,267 2008-09 to date 217,144
Magazines, newspapers and other publications are purchased to support the day to day activity of the Department. Professional journals and other trade publications are purchased to support professional activities and specialist activities such as civil engineering and contract work, the work of the Department's legal services, marine engineering activity. The ‘other publications’ category includes a wide range of types and may include one-off purchases.
It should be noted that the totals for 2002-03, 2003-04 and 2004-05 show the position for the Vehicle Certification Agency and Maritime and Coastguard Agency only. The remainder of the Department could provide this information only at disproportionate cost for these years.
The totals from 2005-06 onwards include all but the data from the Government Car and Despatch Agency and the Driving Standards Agency who could provide this information only at disproportionate cost.
From 2006-07 the central Department introduced a revised coding structure. Prior to this it was not possible to separate expenditure on books and purchases of other official material. The total for 2005-06 therefore includes this expenditure.
The figure provided by the Highways Agency for 2005-06 also includes publications purchased and recorded against specific road projects.
Heathrow Airport
[holding answer 10 March 2009]: The Department for Transport has been working with the organisers of the summit from the outset to ensure that the arrangements for the event involve minimum disruption to airline operators and passengers.
The Department for Transport has been working with the organisers of the summit from the outset to ensure that the arrangements for the event involve minimum disruption to airline operators and passengers.
Heathrow Airport: Road Traffic
Road traffic data for 2008 are not yet available. They will be released as part of the “Road Traffic Statistics 2008: Traffic, Speeds and Congestion” publication in summer 2009.
Road traffic data for specific roads will be published at:
www.dft.gov.uk/matrix
Humber Bridge Board
The then Minister of State for Transport, my hon. Friend the Member for South Thanet (Dr. Ladyman) met with the Humber Bridge Board early in 2007 to discuss revision of interest rates on the debt owed to the Secretary of State. There have been no further discussions with the board.
Humber Bridge: Tolls
This is a matter for the Humber Bridge Board.
Railways: Fares
[holding answer 9 March 2009]: The latest estimate was outlined at the Transport Committee by my noble Friend, the Minister of State (Lord Adonis) on 25 February. We believe lowering fares to the average levels on the continent, as estimated by Passenger Focus, would cost a minimum of £500 million. The Government have no data independent of Passenger Focus on which to undertake modelling.
Roads: Repairs and Maintenance
[holding answer 10 March 2009]: Neither the New Roads and Street Works Act 1991, nor the Traffic Management Act 2004, allows for a street works licence scheme. However part 3 of the Traffic Management Act 2004, which came into force in April 2008, allows local authorities in England, with the consent of the Secretary of State, to operate a permit scheme, under which anyone carrying out works in the public highway must seek permission for those works before proceeding.
No authorities have yet been authorised to operate a permit scheme. Transport for London and 13 London boroughs submitted a London Common Permit scheme for the Department for Transport’s approval in July 2008. The Department sought clarification about the proposed scheme last September and we await further information.
In January 2009 Kent county council submitted a separate application to run a permit scheme. This is being considered by officials.
Rolling Stock
[holding answer 6 March 2009]: Exclusive of passenger capacity, and when compared to an Intercity 225 train, the Super Express train will consume just over 2 per cent. less energy on a typical journey between London and Edinburgh.
The energy consumption rate increases as the train's speed increases. Super Express trains will offer faster journeys than today's Intercity 225 trains. The new trains could be made more energy efficient if they were to operate as slowly as the current trains, although this would result in a less competitive rail service.
Transport: Crimes of Violence
This information is not held by the Department for Transport, but by the British Transport police who can be contacted at:
British Transport police
25 Camden Road
London NW1 9LN
E-mail:
parliament@btp.pnn.police.uk
Justice
Graveyards: Safety
We are now discussing with relevant representative organisations how best to obtain early feedback on our recently-published guidelines on managing the safety of memorials. We are also planning to undertake a fuller assessment, probably through a questionnaire, a year after publication.
We will address any questions or concerns about the application or interpretation of the guidance on memorial safety as they come to our attention.
Legal Aid: Housing
The Legal Services Commission (LSC) funds free legal representation at repossession hearings via the Housing Possession Court Duty Scheme. The scheme is available at 112 courts. There follows a full list of the courts where the scheme is available.
The LSC does not record the number of advisers per court and there is no specific number of advisers required. The LSC does require that legal aid providers ensure there is at least one adviser in court when the possession lists are heard and that all sessions are covered.
Aldershot and Farnborough
Alnwick
Ashford
Barnsley
Barnet
Basildon
Birkenhead
Birmingham
Bishop Auckland
Blackpool
Bow
Bradford
Bridlington
Brighton
Bromley
Burton on Trent
Bury St Edmunds
Cambridge
Central London
Cheltenham
Chesterfield
Colchester
Consett
Coventry
Croydon
Darlington
Dartford
Derby
Dewsbury
Doncaster
Dover
Dudley
Durham
Eastbourne
Edmonton
Folkestone
Gateshead
Gee Street Court (Clerkenwell)
Gee Street Court (Shoreditch)
Gloucester
Gravesham
Great Yarmouth
Grimsby
Halifax
Harlow
Hartlepool
Hertford
Huddersfield
Hull
Huntingdon
Ilford
Keighley
Kettering
Kidderminster
Kings Lynn
Kingston
Lambeth
Lancaster
Leeds
Liverpool
Lowestoft
Luton
Mansfield
Morpeth and Berwick
Newcastle
North Shields
Northampton
Norwich
Nottingham
Nuneaton
Oxford
Peterborough
Pontefract
Portsmouth
Preston
Redditch
Rotherham
Rugby
Runcorn
Scarborough
Scunthorpe
Sheffield
Skipton
Slough
South Shields
Southend
Southport
St Albans
St Helens
Stafford
Stoke on Trent
Stourbridge
Sunderland
Swansea
Tameside
Tamworth
Teesside
Tunbridge Wells
Wakefield
Wandsworth
Warrington
Watford
Wellingborough
West London
Weston Super Mare
Whitby
Whitehaven
Winchester
Wolverhampton
Woolwich
Worcester
Worthing
York.
In addition to the LSC funded schemes, the Department for Communities and Local Government funds 41 court desk schemes in England:
DCLG funded schemes:
Accrington
Banbury
Barnstaple
Barrow-in-Furness
Bedford
Bodmin
Bristol
Burnley
Buxton
Cirencester Magistrates
Evesham
Grantham
Harrogate
Haywards Heath
Hereford
Kendal
Lewes
Lincoln
Ludlow
Maidstone
Melton Mowbray
Nelson
Newark
Newport (I.O.W.)
Northwich
Oswestry
Penrith
Penzance
Rawtenstall
Salisbury
Shrewsbury
Skegness
Stratford
Swindon
Telford
Trowbridge
Truro
Walsall
Warwick
Worksop
Yeovil.
Free legal representation at repossession hearings in Wales is available through Swansea county court, and details of the number of people who have received assistance in each month since it was first piloted in January 2002 are shown as follows.
Between January 2004 and March 2005 there are no these data available. At that time the reporting of these data relied on providers submitting paper forms to the Legal Services Commission and in some cases no forms were ever sent. Since April 2007 these data have been submitted electronically and consequently the figures are more reliable.
Number 2002 January 8 February 10 March 7 April 12 May 18 June 10 July 12 August 6 September 9 October 12 November 4 December 12 2003 January 9 February 6 March 5 April 17 May 5 June 9 July 11 August 12 September 10 October 7 November 1 December 4 2004 January — February — March — April — May — June — July — August — September — October — November — December — 2005 January — February — March — April 4 May 1 June 6 July 6 August 11 September 6 October 0 November 0 December 21 2006 January 14 February 4 March 0 April 5 May 12 June 5 July 23 August 7 September 13 October 14 November 5 December 4 2007 January 16 February 9 March 9 April 14 May 9 June 8 July 14 August 9 September 9 October 14 November 8 December 8 2008 January 14 February 12 March 15 April 17 May 6 June 9 July 16 August 13 September 17 October 18 November 11 December 4 2009 January 11 February 6
(2) how much the Legal Services Commission spent on acts of assistance relating to housing in each of the last five years; and how much has been spent in 2008-09 to date on applications for acts of assistance;
(3) how many new housing matters have been started by the Legal Services Commission in 2008-09;
(4) what proportion of all applications for (a) civil representations and (b) legal help in 2008-09 to date have been related to housing.
The information requested is currently being collated. I will write to the hon. Member as soon as the information becomes available.
Legal Aid: Negligence
The information requested is currently being collated. I will write to the hon. Member once the information becomes available.
Reoffenders: Essex
The measure of reoffending used to provide National Statistics for England and Wales is not broken down by area. However, newly published data on local adult reoffending (a different measure of reoffending to the national statistics) are broken down by probation area and local authority (upper tier only).
The number of offenders used to calculate the local reoffending rate for the Essex probation area between 1 October 2007 and 30 September 2008 is 20,810 and the reoffending rate is 8.19 per cent.
The number of offenders used to calculate the local reoffending rate for the Essex county council area, which excludes the unitary authorities of Southend-on-Sea and Thurrock, is 15,737 and the reoffending rate is 8.20 per cent.
The local measure measures the reoffending of all offenders on the probation caseload, aged 18 or over, at a certain point in time (a “snapshot”), while the national measure covers all offenders commencing a court order under probation supervision or released from custody during the first quarter of the year. Additionally, the local measure allows a three month period for reoffences to be committed, while the national measure allows a year.
The local reoffending figures are produced by aggregating the data of four snapshots of the probation caseload. Therefore the number of offenders quoted above is approximately four times the number of offenders on the caseload at any one time.
A reoffending rate of 8.19 per cent. with a caseload size of 20,810 does not mean that 1,704 different offenders committed a reoffence, as some offenders may have appeared in more than one cohort and reoffended more than once.
It should be noted the probation supervision of some offenders may end during the period while their reoffending is being monitored. Therefore some reoffences may be committed after probation supervision has finished.
For further details please see “Local reoffending results 1 October 2007 to 30 September 2008 England and Wales” available at:
http://www.justice.gov.uk/docs/local-adult-reoffending-oct07-sept08.pdf
This is the first time that reoffending data at the local level have been made available.
The Ministry of Justice does not currently collate reoffending data at the constituency level.
Wetherby Young Offender Institution
(2) how much outdoor exercise boys in Wetherby Young Offenders Institution are able to take;
(3) how often boys held on red level in Wetherby Young Offenders Institution have association with other young people; and how long on average they spend alone in their cells each day;
(4) how often boys held on red level in Wetherby Young Offenders Institution are permitted to telephone their families;
(5) what the arrangements for providing boys in Wetherby Young Offenders Institution with decent clothing are;
(6) how often boys held on red level in Wetherby Young Offenders Institution are allowed to have a shower;
(7) how many boys in each age cohort have been placed on red level in Wetherby Young Offenders Institution in each month since January 2008; and for how long each was on red level.
Those on red level status have the same access to telephones during office hours as other young people at Wetherby. However like all other young people they are normally engaged in educational or vocational training activities during the core day. If a young person needs to contact his solicitor a member of staff will facilitate it as soon as possible.
During the week, young people walk to their activity areas each day in the fresh air. At weekends, all young people have access to at least one hour's outdoor exercise per day. During the summer months, young people also have access to outdoor exercise in the evenings. In addition there are a large number of outdoor activities as well as horticultural and recycling vocational training. Some physical education activities also take place outdoors.
Young people on red level participate in the whole range of purposeful activities and curriculum. However they do not take part in association with other young people during the evenings or at weekends. Typically, they might expect to be out of their room for approximately 6.75 hours each day during weekdays, although this will vary for each young person.
Young people on red level are permitted to telephone their families at least every other day. However, more frequent contact can be arranged in cases where young people would benefit from it.
Freshly laundered clothing is issued to young people on a weekly basis. They receive five T-shirts, seven pairs of underpants, socks, a gym vest and shorts, two jumpers and two pairs of trousers. Each unit also keeps a stock of clean clothing in case a young person requires an emergency replacement.
48 rooms at Wetherby have a fitted shower providing unlimited access. The vast majority of other young people, including those on red level, have an opportunity to shower daily when they attend physical education activities or during the evening association periods.
The information on numbers of young people placed on red level and the length of time spent on red level is not held in the format requested and would involve the examination of a very large numbers of individual files which would involve disproportionate cost.
Wymott Prison: Manpower
The residential unit at HM Prison Wymott was opened on 19 September 2008. At 31 August 2008 567 staff were employed in Wymott and at 30 September 2008 573 staff were employed in this establishment. As at 28 February 2009, there were 562 staff employed in this establishment
Culture, Media and Sport
Anniversaries
No one Department within Whitehall deals with anniversary events as such. Decisions on commemorating significant occasions or events are taken by Ministers and then the most appropriate Department will take forward the arrangements.
DCMS is responsible within Government for co-ordinating the annual Remembrance Day ceremony at the Cenotaph.
Anniversaries for which celebrations are planned by DCMS sponsored bodies include the 200th anniversary of the birth of Charles Darwin, organised by English Heritage, and the 500th anniversary of Henry Vlll’s accession to the throne, organised by Historic Royal Palaces. Both these anniversaries occur in 2009 and plans by the Department, or its sponsored bodies, for the celebration of other major anniversaries will be announced nearer the time.
British Library
Extensive fire and flood prevention and protection measures are built into (a) British Library premises and (b) other places where items from the national collection are stored. The British Library and other places where items from the national collection are stored are aware of the risk to collections from a fire sprinkler malfunction and have accounted for this at design stage and in on-going procedures. In addition, the Museums, Libraries and Archives Council has a National Security Adviser who can advise and carry out fire and security risk assessments.
Broadcasting: EU Action
The estimated additional cost of the EU Audiovisual Media Services Directive is £505,000 per annum plus £250,000 in one-off transition costs.
We set out these costs in the preliminary impact assessments published with our consultation on 31 July 2008. They will fall to be met by the video-on-demand industry, and by non-EU satellite channels uplinked from the UK. They do not take into account the savings to the industry of replacing the current self-regulatory arrangements for video-on-demand services.
Updated impact assessments will be published with the implementing regulations later this year. I have made no estimate of the regulatory costs of the Television Without Frontiers Directive, which preceded the AVMS Directive and was last revised in 1997.
Departmental Detergents
The Department does not use any cleaning products or ingredients that have been tested on animals.
Departmental Ministerial Policy Advisors
Costs incurred will be available only when the Department’s resource accounts are fully audited and laid before Parliament. This is expected to be before the 2009 summer recess.
Departmental NDPBs
The risk ratings are an internal tool that we use to guide our day-to-day relationship with each sponsored body. The ratings can change whenever there is a significant change in a body’s activities or in its external environment, therefore we do not publish them.
We will shortly use the risk ratings to delegate greater freedom, where appropriate, for sponsored bodies to undertake capital projects without having to seek approval from Government. We will continue to look for ways of streamlining the framework of checks and controls that applies to low-risk bodies.
Departmental Postal Services
The Department sent 42,170 items of mail in the last 12 months. 100 per cent. were given to the Royal Mail.
Departmental Public Appointments
This information is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Departmental Public Consultants
The Department has no records of payments to either Deborah Mattinson or Opinion Leader Research Limited.
Departmental Training
Within the last 12 months the Department for Culture, Media and Sport has not provided voice coaching courses for any of its employees.
Hotels: Greater London
The London Development Agency have advised that, as at February 2009, 57 per cent. of visitor accommodation facilities (rooms) in London are accredited under the national quality accreditation scheme. This includes hostels, campus sites, serviced and self-catering apartments, bed and breakfast establishments/guesthouses, caravan parks, hotels, single rooms and accommodation found through agencies. The figure for hotels alone is 76 per cent. of rooms.
The London Development Agency have advised that as at January 2009 they had spent £443,397 promoting quality improvement in London for businesses that provide accommodation.
ITV Wales: Hearing Impaired
The Communications Act 2003 sets minimum targets for signing of programmes by broadcasters. However, it is the responsibility of Ofcom to ensure that these requirements are met. The Government understand that the signing of parts of some regional news programmes provided by ITV has always been in addition to the minimum targets set out in the Communications Act 2003.
Government welcome the fact that last year all ITV channels exceeded their minimum access services targets set out by Ofcom and that ITV intend to continue to subtitle all of their news programmes and bulletins.
Legal Deposit: Digital Technology
Recommendations on legal deposit for digital and online media are being received from the Legal Deposit Advisory Panel on an ongoing basis and are considered as they are received. Policy formulated in response to recommendations will be published for public consultation at the appropriate time. The decision whether to publish the recommendations themselves will be taken as part of that process.
National Library of Scotland
The National Library of Scotland is a devolved function and this is a matter for the Scottish Executive.
Public Libraries
It is unlikely that the time taken to publish the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy’s (CIPFA's) survey of library usage will have an effect on public library authority budgets for 2009-10.
Due to the various validity checks from both CIPFA and the Audit Commission, and taking in queries from local authorities, the earliest date that figures can be shared with all subscribers is November. Data are published nationally between January and March. CIPFA believes this timetable ensures a 100 per cent. response rate and accurate data. We do not believe this timetable affects an authority’s ability to plan budgets for the following financial year.
DCMS is represented on the CIPFA Library Standards and Statistics Working Party, but has not otherwise discussed the survey with CIPFA.
Being the primary source of data on public libraries, we look forward to the publication of the annual CIPFA statistics. However, we believe that local authorities should have the freedom to manage their library budgets in accordance with the needs and wishes of their communities and that close monitoring of their performance is unnecessary.
The Library Service Modernisation Review, which was launched by the Secretary of State in October, will define Government’s high level vision for the provision of modernised library services, and the necessary steps to achieve this vision, and is intended to encourage excellence in all authorities. We believe that participation increases when services are excellent and we hope that results of our own Taking Part and Active People surveys will demonstrate year on year increases in library participation.
Royal Parks Agency: Parking
[holding answer 9 March 2009]: The Royal Parks (TRP) advise that a consultation is underway about the possibility of introducing parking charges in Bushy and Richmond parks and the level of the fee. No decision has been taken about whether the proposal will be adopted or the level of charge and nor will it be until the consultation is complete.
Sex Establishments
Lap dancing itself is not a licensable activity under the Licensing Act 2003, which controls activities such as “the performance of dance” but has no role in censoring the content of any such performance. The Government currently have no plans to change the regime for permitted temporary activities contained in the Licensing Act 2003 or to give it a new role involving censorship. I am aware that concerns regarding the use of temporary events notices for lapdancing events were raised during the House of Commons committee stage of the Policing and Crime Bill. In response, the Minister with responsibility for crime reduction, the Under-Secretary of State for the Home Department, my hon. Friend the Member for Tynemouth, (Mr. Campbell) stated that he would discuss the issue with the Department for Culture, Media and Sport. These discussions are ongoing.
Television: Licences
I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for South-West Surrey (Mr. Hunt) on 14 October 2008, Official Report, column 1203W.
Tourism
The British Tourism Framework Review, carried out by Deloitte on behalf of VisitBritain, includes assessment of the prospects for the tourism sector in 2009. The report can be located at the following web address:
http://www.visitbritain.com/en/campaigns/tourism-review/reports.aspx
At the National Tourism summit in January 2009 both the Prime Minister, the Secretary of State and I spoke about opportunities within the tourism sector. These include: the increased affordability of our high quality tourism product for visitors from the USA and Eurozone countries; the forthcoming decade of world class sports events which provide opportunities to showcase our towns, cities and regions; and our dynamic culture, incomparable countryside, and heritage.
Tourism: South West
Between 2008 and 2011, the Department will have provided £3.5 million annually to the regional development agencies for the support of the tourism industry.
In the same period, the DCMS will have provided over £130 million to VisitBritain and VisitEngland to market Britain to overseas visitors, and England to domestic visitors respectively.
DCMS has also made £45 million (£15 million per annum over three years) available through the Sea Change programme, which aims to help the regeneration of seaside resorts in England through cultural and heritage projects. In the first year of the programme (2008-09), £4,160,655 was allocated to the south west as set out in the following table:
Seaside town/resort Grant allocated (£) Torbay 2,247,532 Boscombe 455,000 Teignmouth 376,676 Weston-Super-Mare 951,447 Westward Ho! 1100,000 Ilfracombe 230,000 1 Development grant 2 Feasibility grant
Home Department
Anti-Semitism
Where there is clear, reliable evidence that a non British citizen has engaged in one or more of a list of unacceptable behaviours, and has not clearly and publicly repudiated their previous extremist views or actions, there will be a presumption towards exclusion from the UK. The list includes behaviour likely to incite racial or religious hatred. Each case will be considered carefully to determine whether the evidence provided demonstrates that the person’s actions or activities constitute unacceptable behaviour and therefore justify exclusion from the UK.
Asylum: Zimbabwe
[holding answer 12 February 2009]: There were 945 Zimbabwean principal asylum seekers refused asylum at initial decision in 2005, 1,510 in 2006, 1,115 in 2007 and 1,660 between January and September 2008. All figures are rounded to the nearest five and 2007 and 2008 figures are provisional.
Information on asylum is published annually and quarterly. Annual figures are available in Table 3.3 of Asylum Statistics United Kingdom 2007 published on 21 August 2008. Quarterly figures are available in the supplementary web tables published with the Control of Immigration: Quarterly Statistics Summary. Q4 2008 was available from 24 February 2009 from the Library of the House and from the Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate website at:
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/immigration-asylum-stats.html
Begging and Vagrancy
There have been no recent assessments of alternatives to the criminal justice system in reducing the incidence of begging or vagrancy. It is for local areas to determine what works best for them in tackling the problem where it exists.
Binyam Mohamed
We do not normally comment on individual cases and cannot confirm or deny whether an individual is seeking asylum in the United Kingdom. Mr. Mohamed has only recently returned to the United Kingdom and his current status is accordingly being considered.
Contracts: Costs
[holding answer 27 January 2009]: Details of the largest information technology contracts agreed by the Department since 1997 are as follows:
IT contract First estimate Last estimate Outturn cost Criminal Records Bureau PPP agreement: Capita 400 400 1334 Independent Safeguarding Authority—Vetting and Barring Scheme: Logica 47 50 128.5 HO and UKBA—IT2000 provision of desktop, remote access, applications. 700 700 1,2566 UKBA—IND Procurement of Infrastructure, Development and Support (IPIDS): ATOS Origin 250 250 130 UKBA—Mycroft—SERCO 42 42 143.5 UKBA—IAFs (Immigration Automated Fingerprinting System): Sagem 31 31 128.7 UKBA. Warnings Index—Fujitsu 32.8 32.8 8.8 UKBA. E-borders—Trusted Borders Consortium 863 880 1105 UKBA—Semaphore: IBM 30 50 45.7 Group Wide Services (GWS): Savvis 1st tranche Applications 7 7 13.7 IPS—PASS 116 116 1,3338 IPS Pass subsequent phases 244 244 3— IPS—Admin IT: ATOS Origin 55 55 149 IPS—Search/Analysis system—Biographical Footprint check: Equifax plc 8 313.4 1,313.4 Secure Hosting of above—Equifax plc 4 3— 3— IPS—PIMIS: IBM 9 9 9 IPS—PKI: nCipher Corporation 7 8.5 15 IPS—Fraud MI: Logica CMG 0.8 1.5 1.5 IPS—Website: Redweb Ltd. 0.5 0.5 32.0 Website—Subsequent phases and support—Redweb Ltd. 1.5 1.5 3— IPS—ICT Goods and Services: Computacenter 4— 16 16 1 To date. 2 January 2009. 3 Indicates brace 4 OGC cross government framework
Crime: Internet
These data are not kept centrally. Crimes are prosecuted on the basis of the offence committed and not the medium used.
Departmental Postal Services
This information is not held centrally for the whole Department. However an estimated 275,000 letters were sent by Royal Mail from the Department’s HQ at 2 Marsham street in the last 12 months. Apart from couriers and the Government’s internal dispatch service no other postal provider has been used. 2 Marsham street also houses Ministry of Justice staff whose letters are included in this estimate.
Domestic Violence
The information requested is not available centrally.
Firearms
[holding answer 9 February 2009]: We do not hold this information centrally.
Firearms: Chelmsford
The information requested is not collected centrally.
Information on stops and searches under PACE and the number of resultant arrests for weapons and drugs reported to the Home Office are broken down by police force area only, and cannot separately identify searches in individual constituency areas.
Forensic Science: Females
The data requested are given in the table.
Number of female forensic nurses trained 2005 1 2006 14 2007 4 2008 4 2009 1— Total 23 1 None to date.
Genetics: Databases
This information is not held centrally.
Illegal Immigrants
In 2008 alone, over 28,000 attempts to cross the channel and enter the UK illegally were prevented at the juxtaposed ports of Calais, Coquelles and Dunkirk.
The following tables represent the number of clandestines detected in lorries at the juxtaposed locations in northern France from 2005 to 2008 as well as ports within the UK.
2005 2006 2007 2008 U/E FP U/E FP U/E FP U/E FP January 189 872 364 1,227 406 819 785 1,894 February 191 662 427 727 303 643 683 1,394 March 235 705 332 875 297 508 571 947 April 266 887 367 893 320 631 549 1,054 May 249 834 403 946 448 724 490 978 June 207 863 372 820 327 734 506 1,231 July 350 877 377 780 455 717 625 1,306 August 388 894 560 1,092 448 1,075 650 1,900 September 270 927 424 1,317 497 1,286 946 2,055 October 396 842 664 1,588 701 1,771 1,077 2,567 November 449 1,269 528 842 651 1,996 941 2,313 December 423 694 386 587 606 1,517 721 1,824 Total 3,613 10,326 5,204 11,694 5,459 12,421 8,544 19,463 Key: U/E = Represents figures for UKBA detections at juxtaposed ports including contracted partners. FP = Represents figures for detections at juxtaposed ports by the French port authorities.
2005 2006 2007 2008 January 60 68 51 68 February 26 43 20 69 March 35 18 27 43 April 17 66 36 26 May 46 41 26 46 June 34 42 28 16 July 41 40 37 31 August 50 40 51 55 September 45 36 56 45 October 55 62 84 57 November 47 53 42 89 December 64 32 83 70 Total 520 561 541 615
2005 2006 2007 2008 January — — 3 8 February — — 10 4 March — 5 9 — April — 14 — 4 May — 8 — 7 June — 6 23 12 July — 4 8 12 August — 1 8 September — 1 9 9 October — 1 2 6 November — 17 — — December — — — 4 Total 81 57 64 74
2005 2006 2007 2008 January — — — 38 February — — 4 13 March — — 7 10 April — — 9 9 May — — 12 7 June — — 3 13 July — 1 10 24 August — — 2 16 September — 9 7 22 October — 16 — 7 November — 2 16 14 December — 2 — 11 Total — 30 70 184
2005 2006 2007 2008 January — 15 29 24 February — 42 18 10 March — 9 12 5 April — 8 7 10 May — 15 27 9 June — 14 44 14 July — 10 21 17 August — 44 24 8 September — 19 31 19 October — 17 20 14 November — 20 44 20 December — 20 18 4 Total 163 233 295 154
All the data provided above have been compiled from locally held management information and as such do not represent National Statistics. They may therefore be subject to change.
National Police Improvement Agency: Consultants
The total National Policing Improvement Agency (NPIA) consultancy spend for the 2007-08 financial year was £71.4 million. This spend is made up of £66.5 million which was recorded in the Income and Expenditure accounts, along with £4.9 million of capitalised spend, which was included in the fixed asset additions for the year.
The main consultancy services purchased by the NPIA are:
specialised technical resources needed in the design and build of technology projects, for use by the police service,
project and programme management skills,
specific expert advice and guidance, where the NPIA does not retain the required skills or knowledge.
We do not hold this information in the format requested, but are able to provide the following without incurring disproportionate cost.
Table 1 shows consultancy spend on key projects within the NPIA during 2007-08.
Table 2 shows the cost of the 20 largest suppliers of consultancy resource to the NPIA during this period.
£ million Custody and Case 19.4 IMPACT 12.5 Livescan 9.2 Airwave 4.5 Schengen Information System II 3.4 PentiP 1.7
£ million Metropolitan police authority1 10.4 Northrop Grumman Commercial Sys 8.7 Capgemini UK Plc 7.0 SunGard Public Sector Ltd. 5.5 PA Consulting Group 2.4 Rullion Computer Personnel Ltd. 2.0 Cable and Wireless Communications 1.6 Accenture 1.3 Imperial College London 1.2 LA International Consultants 1.2 Generic Software Consultants Ltd. 1.2 Northgate SIS Ltd. (Anite) 1.1 Northgate Information Solutions UK 0.8 Hudson Global Resources 0.8 Parity Solutions Ltd. 0.7 Amtec Consulting plc 0.6 Spring Technology Staffing Services 0.6 Arqiva 0.5 Parity Resources 0.5 QinetiQ 0.5 1 The Metropolitan Police Authority is shown as a supplier as it is recharging some of its own costs incurred for work on NPIA projects
Offensive Weapons: Convictions
The information requested is shown in the following table.
Figures for individual TKAP areas are not provided, on the advice of statisticians, because the numbers are small for some areas and this means that changes over time for an area can be volatile.
Number of offences 2004 5,016 2005 4,883 2006 4,859 2007 4,701 2008 5,516
The figures for the most recent period are likely to be revised as more information is recorded by the police.
Police: Databases
[holding answer 10 March 2009]: The latest available statistics for the information sought were produced on 21 January 2009.
The number of persons with at least one arrest/summons entry on the Police National Computer was 7,258,061.
The number of persons with at least one caution was 1,819,509, of which 1,465,975 had one caution. Therefore the number of persons with more than one caution was 353,534.
Prostitution
(2) when the Violent Crime Unit plans to publish responses to its consultation letter on proposals for prostitution legislation dated 26 September 2008.
The Government wrote to a range of interested organisations on 26 September to seek their views on the proposed legislation. We received 67 responses from a variety of organisations representing the voluntary sector, statutory partners, local authorities and representatives of persons involved in prostitution and the lap-dancing industry. This was not a formal consultation and we did not indicate to potential respondents that their responses would be published. We therefore do not feel it appropriate to do so, although individual organisations are, of course, free to publicise their own views.
The issues involved here have also been subject to detailed scrutiny and discussion during the passage of the Policing and Crime Bill.
Public Order Offences
It is not possible to provide the breakdown requested. Police forces in England and Wales notify the Home Office of an aggregated figure for ‘Other offences against the State and public order’ but individual offences within that offence classification cannot be separately identified centrally.
Serious Organised Crime Agency: Consultants
The information is as follows:
£ million (a) 2006-07 1.60 (b) 2007-08 1.62 (c) 2008-09 (to 31 January 2009) 1.36
Theft
[holding answer 10 March 2009]: The information requested is given in the table.
July to September Offence 2003 2004 2005 Shoplifting 74,831 68,530 72,953 Robbery of business property 2,268 1,691 1,859 Theft by an employee 4,307 4,412 4,188
Vetting
The Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) does not hold the information in the format requested.
The CRB operates to a set of published service standards (PSS) which include to issue 90 per cent. of standard disclosures within 10 days and 90 per cent. of enhanced disclosures within 28 days.
The figures showing how many and what percentage of enhanced disclosures were completed in 28 days or fewer and in more than 28 days in each financial year since 2004 are shown in the following table:
Number Percentage Number Percentage Total 2004-05 1,938,010 89.9 217,730 10.1 2,155,740 2005-06 2,073,621 84.4 383,276 15.6 2,456,897 2006-07 2,494,629 84.6 454,105 15.4 2,948,743 2007-08 2,828,768 93.4 199,892 6.6 3,028,660 2008-09 2,528,724 88.2 338,310 11.8 2,867,034
Information from before 2004 was not recorded in this format and therefore is. unavailable.
Victim Support Schemes: Finance
Responsibility for decisions on local funding of rape crisis and domestic violence services has moved from central Government to regional areas and local partnerships. Decisions on funding for local services are based on local areas identifying a need and including this in their priorities for improvement with outcomes specifying how the issues will be addressed and how they contribute to wider national aims.
Work Permits
[holding answer 23 February 2009]: The following table provides a breakdown of occupations in the category “Others” and the associated number of individual approved work permit applications for the period 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2008 with the appropriate caveats.
Occupation 2006 2007 2008 Total Polo Groom 900 1,025 1,590 3,515 Other Legal Occupation 1,095 1,140 1,035 3,270 Head Chef 970 955 1,130 3,060 Lecturer (University) 990 1,110 890 2,990 Second Chef 975 945 950 2,875 Computer Programmer 980 800 950 2,730 Other Construction/Land Occupation 815 810 820 2,445 Musician 780 805 845 2,430 Architect 855 845 730 2,430 Fashion (Model) 710 750 835 2,300 Pharmacist 660 670 760 2,090 Researchers-Sponsored 735 715 470 1,920 Restaurant Manager 670 575 665 1,915 Social Worker 785 550 560 1,895 Groom 335 495 575 1,405 Other Entertainment Related Occupation 410 420 485 1,315 Singer 390 435 450 1,275 Surveyor 435 475 340 1,245 Mushroom Processor - SBS 1,155 10 * 1,165 Electrical/Electronic Engineer 365 345 385 1,095 Radiographer 345 445 295 1,080 Senior House Officer 640 345 65 1,050 Specialist Registrar 595 250 195 1,040 Lawyer 435 365 220 1,020 Waiter/Waitress 470 385 165 1,020 Civil/Structural Engineer 290 395 325 1,010 Jockey (Work Rider) 245 315 405 970 Other Transport Related Occupation 370 315 280 965 General Manager 320 325 265 910 Aircraft Engineer 200 270 395 870 Meat Process Operative-SBS 850 5 — 855 Solicitor 275 265 310 850 Auditing 305 280 265 850 Cricket Player/Coach 195 245 340 775 Other Agricultural Occupation 345 205 175 730 Physiotherapist 305 245 170 720 Foundation Programme Dr 355 215 145 715 Cricket Player 270 250 180 700 Fashion (Other Related Occupation) 280 220 180 685 Mechanical Engineer 220 210 230 660 Disc Jockey 210 205 225 640 Computer Engineer 290 160 175 620 Skilled Craftsmen 235 145 190 570 It Manager 185 185 185 560 Actor (Film) 185 175 180 540 Trader 150 200 180 530 Dental Surgeon 215 155 145 520 Architectural Technician 155 185 175 515 Technician (Film) 140 185 160 485 Geologist 140 155 190 485 Meat Cutter - SBS 460 15 * 480 Occupational Therapist 180 155 140 475 Network Specialist 160 150 115 430 Polo Player 120 115 180 415 Other Sports Related Occupation 125 165 100 390 Veterinary Surgeon 140 135 115 390 Hotel Manager 175 115 85 375 Database Specialist 90 155 105 350 Biomedical Scientist 135 100 95 330 Actor (Theatre) 110 115 100 325 Kabaddi Player 110 110 95 315 Personnel/Training Manager 100 125 90 310 Dancer (Other) 105 115 90 305 Comedian 70 90 105 260 Investment Analyst 65 90 100 255 Ice Hockey Player 60 85 105 250 Producer (TV) 75 75 95 250 Circus Artiste 95 70 75 245 Lacrosse Development Officer 60 75 100 235 Meat Packer - SBS 235 — — 235 Teacher Foreign Circ 80 85 70 235 Midwife 70 90 70 235 Basketball Player 80 80 70 230 Rugby Union Player 75 70 75 220 Actuary 90 75 55 220 Director (Film) 75 75 65 215 Football Player 70 65 70 210 Hospital Consultant 80 50 60 190 Process Operatives - SBS 190 — — 190 Dancer (Ballet) 60 55 65 180 Psychiatrist 110 40 25 175 Producer (Film) 75 45 50 175 Chemical Engineer 55 65 55 170 Conductor 60 50 65 170 Optician 80 45 40 170 Ship Related Occupation 60 55 55 165 Rugby League Player 60 45 50 155 Personal Assistant 60 50 45 155 Dental Nurse 60 45 50 155 Electronic Engineer 40 35 80 155 Choreographer 50 50 50 150 Fish Filleter - SBS 150 — — 150 Transport & Highways Engineer 50 55 40 145 Meat Bone Extractor - SBS 145 — — 145 Medical Practitioner 55 35 55 145 Manager (Entertainment Related) 45 40 60 140 Animator 45 55 40 140 Sheep Shearer 30 55 50 140 Writer 35 40 55 135 Editor (Film) 40 45 35 115 Purchasing Manager 40 40 30 115 Catering Manager 50 30 30 110 Receptionist 65 25 20 110 Advertising/Public Relations Manager 45 35 30 110 Legal Executive 35 20 55 110 Railway Engineer 50 40 20 105 GP Registrar 65 25 10 100 Coach (Other) 25 35 30 90 Director (Theatre) 40 15 35 90 Editor (TV) 35 35 20 90 Speech Therapist 35 35 20 90 Audiologist 30 20 35 85 Actor (TV) 20 35 25 80 Cricket Coach 25 25 25 80 Technician (Theatre) 40 20 20 80 Farm Worker 40 15 20 75 Attorney 30 25 20 75 Presenter 30 20 25 75 Boxer 30 25 20 70 Dietician 30 20 25 70 Investment Manager 30 15 20 70 Fish Packer - SBS 65 — — 65 Insurance Broker 20 25 20 65 Motor Sports Driver 15 20 25 65 Technician (Music) 15 10 40 65 Bank Manager 20 20 25 65 Camera Person (TV/Film) 25 30 10 65 Psychologist 30 20 15 65 Chiropractor 25 25 10 60 Jockey 20 25 15 60 Kitchen Assistant - SBS 45 15 — 60 Acupuncturist 20 20 20 60 Polo Trainer 35 20 5 60 Photographer 20 20 15 55 Trimmer - SBS 55 — — 55 Water Engineer 15 25 20 55 Treasurer/Financial Mgr 15 25 15 55 Meat Bone Breaker - SBS 55 — — 55 Assistant Dentist 30 20 5 50 Speedway 15 15 15 50 Interpreter/Translator 20 15 10 50 Airline Pilot 10 20 15 45 Director TV 10 25 10 45 Ice Skater 10 20 15 45 Road Crew 10 15 20 45 It Architect (Senior) 15 20 10 40 Materials Engineer 15 15 10 40 Animal Gut Remover - SBS 30 — — 30 Rail Engineer (Structural/Bridge) 10 15 5 30 Snooker Player 10 10 10 30 Dancer (Contemporary) 10 5 10 30 Food Service Op - SBS 30 — — 30 Technician (TV) 5 15 10 30 Electronic and Opto-Elect 5 10 10 25 Producer (Music) 10 10 10 25 Composer 5 10 10 25 Captain 10 15 * 25 Cold Store Operative - SBS 25 — — 25 Farm Manager 10 5 10 25 TV Consultant 5 5 10 25 Hockey Player 10 10 5 20 Stock Broker 5 10 5 20 Commentator * 10 10 20 Director Music 5 5 5 20 Gymnasts Coach 10 5 5 20 Chick Sexer 5 15 * 20 Rail Engineer (Transport/Highway) 15 * 5 20 Martial Arts Coach 10 5 5 15 Racquet Sport Coach 10 5 * 15 Cleaner Of Premises - SBS 15 * — 15 Waiting Staff - SBS 15 * — 15 Circus Rigger 5 * 5 15 Editor (Music) 5 5 5 15 Rugby Union Coach 5 5 5 15 Water Sports Related Occupation 5 5 5 15 Helicopter Pilot 10 5 5 15 Meat Slaughterer - SBS 15 — — 15 Chef (NVQ2 & Below) - SBS 15 — — 15 Fitness Consultant 5 5 5 10 Production Accountant 5 * 5 10 Wrestler 5 5 5 10 Other Occupation-SBS (Gen) 10 — — 10 Lairageman - SBS 10 — — 10 Basketball Coach 5 5 * 10 Magician 5 5 5 10 Commodity Broker * 5 5 10 Other Occupation-SBS (Fish) 10 — — 10 Mc (Master Of Ceremonies) — 5 * 10 Boxing Coach 5 5 * 5 Dental Anaesthetist 5 * — 5 Not Stated * 5 5 5 Chiropodist/Podiatrist * * * 5 Bar Staff - SBS 5 * — 5 Football Manager/Coach * * — 5 Room Attendant - SBS 5 — — 5 Rugby League Coach — * * 5 Advocate * * — 5 Hockey Coach * * — 5 Martial Arts Performer 5 — — 5 Racquet Sport Player * * * 5 Assistant Optometrist — * * * Gymnast * — — * Ice Hockey Coach — * * * Kirtan Performer * — — * American Football Tech — — * * Barrister — * — * Other Occupation - SBS (Meat) * — — * Reception Staff - SBS * — — * Total 30,935 25,975 25,320 82,235 Notes: Figures are rounded to nearest 5. Because of rounding, figures may not add up to totals shown. The figures quoted are not provided under National Statistics protocols and have been derived from local management information and are therefore provisional and subject to change. The occupational categories used are not compatible with those in the Standard Occupational Classification Caveats: The figures do not equate to the number of individual nationals who were granted permits because they include those applications approved to extend or amend an existing permit or where the individual has moved to another job with a different employer. Not all those who were granted a permit took up the job and some may have been refused entry clearance or further leave to remain.
House of Commons Commission
Security
We do not disclose the exact disposition of our security operation. The security work force is regularly reviewed by the Serjeant at Arms and Black Rod in consultation with the Joint Committee on Security.
International Development
Burma: Asylum
The Department for International Development (DFID) has not established any programmes or provided funding specifically to assist Rohingya refugees. We do, however, provide assistance to the refugees indirectly through our contributions to the European Commission and to United Nations organisations which have programmes to support Rohingya refugee camps in Bangladesh.
We are also helping to meet the humanitarian needs of Rohingya people living in Burma's northern Rakhine State through our contributions to multi-donor programmes which operate across the country. These include a UNICEF fund for primary education and the Three Diseases Fund which was set up to fight HIV/AIDS, malaria and TB in Burma.
Departmental Manpower
The Department for International Development (DFID) no longer publicises staff numbers for country offices, irrespective of whether they were assessed by the National Audit Office in October 2008.
Overseas Aid: Finance
Plans for the Department for International Development's (DFID) bilateral and multilateral assistance over the three years 2008-09 to 2010-11 were published in May 2008 in DFID's 2008 annual report. Any revisions to those allocation plans in the light of the changed economic situation will be published in DFID's 2009 annual report.
Communities and Local Government
Agriculture: Planning Permission
The information requested is not held centrally. Communities and Local Government collects quarterly summary statistics on development control from all local planning authorities in England. However, we do not collect information on individual planning applications.
Christmas
The Department does not have any policies regarding additional leave entitlement for Christmas shopping or Christmas bonus payments.
Community Relations
(2) how many local authorities have selected National Indicator 35 as part of their local area agreements; and when local authorities are due to report on progress against that indicator in respect of work done under the Prevent strand of Project Contest in 2008.
In responding to the observations in the “Preventing Violent Extremism: Learning and Development Exercise” report relating to assessing success, my Department has responded by commissioning research from the Tavistock Institute and De Montfort University to investigate the national and international contributing factors to violent extremism. On 10 December 2008 the Secretary of State announced that we would be working to establish a national ‘centre of excellence’ that local areas can access for practical advice on Prevent; and we have published guidance produced jointly between Communities and Local Government, the Home Office and the Office for Public Management to assist local authorities and the police in reporting outcomes linked to National Indicator 35 (NI 35). Currently 19 local authorities have selected NI 35 as a priority indicator as part of their local area agreements. Progress against NI 35 for 2008-09 will be reported from April 2009.
Area Based Grant was introduced in April 2008 and is a single grant paid to local authorities. Details of all area based grant allocations made for 2008-09 and 2009-10 are available at:
http://www.communities.gov.uk/localgovernment/localgovernmentfinance/areabasedgrant/
Our overall budget for this Comprehensive Spending Review period (2008-11) is £84.5 million (£20.5 million/£27.5 million/£36.5 million). Over the CSR period, £45 million of this funding will be paid through the area based grant to local authorities, and £5.1 million will be allocated through the community leadership fund.
The Department has budgeted to spend £8.5 million on Prevent related projects in the financial year 2008-09. The budget allocation split for the following two years 2009-11 has not yet been finalised, but we expect to support national projects in a number of areas including: theological understanding; building community resilience; engaging and empowering young Muslims and Muslim women; local partnerships and delivery; faith institutions; campaigns; and research and evaluation.
Community Relations: Finance
(2) how the priority local authorities selected to receive funding from the £33 million left to be distributed to priority local authorities under the Prevent strand of Project Contest for April 2008 to March 2011 were selected by her Department; how much each will receive; and what mechanisms are in place to assess whether measures implemented by these local authorities are effective.
Local authorities will be assessed from April 2008 using National Indicator 35 (NI35), and through the comprehensive area assessment which will begin in April 2009. Details of all area based grant allocations made from April 2008 to March 2011 are available at:
http://www.communities.gov.uk/localgovernment/localgovernmentfinance/areabasedgrant/
The local authorities provided with Prevent funding over the period 2008-11 have been selected based on the size of their Muslim population. This is to enable them to work with those most vulnerable to violent extremism and to build the resilience in those communities where it is most needed.
Community Relations: Islam
The Young Muslim Advisory Group (YMAG) has been established for a period of two years, ending in September 2010. The YMAG’s progress will be monitored throughout this time by both the Department for Communities and Local Government and the Department for Children, Schools and Families.
Council Housing: Construction
Local authorities which have transferred all their housing stock could build council housing if they consider that they have the necessary skills to develop, have resources available, and can do this efficiently and provide value for money.
Council Housing: Rents
The methodology and formula used to calculate changes in council house rents, and housing subsidy for each local authority, are set out in the annual Housing Revenue Account (HRA) subsidy determination which is available on the Department’s website at
http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/housing/hrasubsidydeterminations0910
I have arranged for a copy of the 2009-10 determination to be placed in the Library of the House.
Council Housing: Tenants’ Rights
The Department has not made an assessment of whether the inclusion of utilities within rent payments may increase the risk of eviction. Tenancy agreements should make clear what services are included within the rent.
CLG have issued guidance which makes clear we expect social landlords to maintain and sustain tenancies wherever possible, focusing on preventative approaches rather than eviction. The basic principles underpinning effective arrears management are well established but in these difficult economic times they become even more important.
Council Tax
The Local Government Finance Act 1992 sets out provisions under which billing authorities are legally required to set their (a) budget requirement and (b) council tax rate for the financial year. Communities and Local Government does not provide guidance in situations where a council is unable to agree a budget.
Departmental Buildings
The figures quoted in the table are in the consolidated 2007-08 Departmental Resource Accounts, published on 21 July 2008, and are included under the budgetary headings; Other Administration Costs, Other Expenditure, Accommodation shown in Note 9 (page 53) and Programme Costs, Other Expenditure, Accommodation shown in Note 10 (page 54). The expenditure was incurred in Central London, Bristol, Hemel Hempstead and Uttoxeter.
Departmental Data Protection
Information is a key asset to Government and its correct handling is vital to the delivery of public services and to the integrity of HMG. The Security Policy Framework, the Data Handling Report and the National Information Assurance Strategy produced by the Cabinet Office provide a strategic framework for protecting information that Government handles and put in place a set of mandatory measures which Departments must adhere to.
The Department for Communities and Local Government is compliant with the security policies contained in the Government Security Policy Framework including those for information security and assurance.
Depending upon the circumstances, a range of sanctions are available including disciplinary or administrative action, and in extreme or persistent cases, termination of employment/services and, if appropriate, criminal proceedings.
Communities and Local Government follows CESG guidance on the use of the Wi-Fi Protected Access 2 (WPA2) communications security protocols in order to protect wireless networks carrying protectively marked (up to RESTRICTED/IL3) traffic. The configuration and operation standards for WPA2 are set out in CESG’s Infosec Manual Y, Use of WPA2 Wireless Security in Government Systems.
Compliance arrangements are in place comprising a system of self assessment, accreditation, assurance reporting, audit and review. Additionally, any security incidents are notified to the IT security manager and departmental IT security officer; and a monthly report is compiled by the service provider, Steria Ltd. These reports show that IT security policies have been broken by CLG employees on three occasions in the past 12 months. In each case the breach was of a minor nature and staff were advised accordingly. Regular daytime security checks are also carried out, to identify unattended PCs that may not have been locked; where these are found guidance has been issued to staff.
(2) what scanning for vulnerabilities her Department conducts of each of its IT devices; what method is used for IT device scans; and how many vulnerabilities have been detected as a result of such scans in the last 12 months.
It is not in the interest of the security of the Department, or that of the public, to disclose detailed information pertaining to electronic breaches of security of Department’s IT systems. Disclosing such information would enable criminals and those who would attempt to cause disruptive threats to the Department to deduce how to conduct attacks and therefore potentially enhance their capability to carry out such attacks.
The Public Inquiry Service Database is hosted in the USA and stores approximately 4,000 records.
Departmental Public Appointments
The information requested is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Departmental Surveys
I refer the hon. Member to the answers given to the hon. Member for Upper Bann (David Simpson) on 26 June 2007, Official Report, column 631W, to the hon. Member for Fareham (Mr. Hoban) on 29 November 2007, Official Report, column 681W and to the right hon. Member for Maidenhead (Mrs. May) on 8 July 2008, Official Report, column 1500W. In addition, Ipsos MORI have been paid £16,520 plus VAT to date for the CLG Pulse Survey 2008. ORC International is currently undertaking a second pilot employee engagement survey as part of a wider survey being led by the Cabinet Office. No payments have been made to date. Cost information for the 2005 and 2006 ODPM surveys, which were also undertaken by ORC International, is not held in the format requested and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Empty Property
Estimates of the number of private and public sector domestic empty dwellings, as at April 2008, are shown in the following table. The term public sector has been interpreted to mean “social rented” dwellings i.e. local authority and registered social landlord owned dwellings.
Number of vacant dwelling Total vacant dwellings 762,640 Local authority 36,940 Registered social landlords 29,240 Private sector 696,450 Sources: Council taxbase and council taxbase supplementary (CTB1 and CTB1S) returns from local authorities for 17 September 2007; housing strategy statistical appendix (HSSA) submitted to Communities and Local Government by local authorities for 1 April 2008; Regulatory statistical return (RSR) as reported to the Housing Corporation by registered social landlords for 31 March 2008.
Total vacant dwellings reported by local authorities through council taxbase returns include long term and short term empty dwellings and second homes. Figures for registered social landlords are for self-contained general needs units only. Estimates for private sector vacant dwellings have been made by deducting local authority and RSL vacant dwellings from the total. This estimate will include a small number of other public sector vacant dwellings.
Vacant stock at district level is collected from a variety of sources:
The number of local authority owned vacant dwellings and the number of ‘other public sector’ (other than local authority and RSL) vacant dwellings is obtained from the Housing Strategy Statistical Appendix (HSSA) and the HRA Business Planning Statistical Appendix (BPSA) submitted to CLG by local authorities.
The number of registered social landlords (RSLs) owned vacant dwellings is obtained from the Regulatory and Statistical Return (RSR) submitted to the Tenants Services Authority by RSLs.
An estimate of the number of private sector vacant dwellings is obtained by subtracting the number of local authority owned, RSL owned and ‘other public sector’ vacant dwellings from the total number of vacant dwellings obtained from council tax records submitted to CLG by local authorities on CTB1 and CTBS1 returns.
Figures on council tax vacants can be found at
http://www.local.communities.gov.uk/finance/stats/ctbase.htm,
and data on stock and vacants for local authorities and RSLs can be found at
http://www.communities.gov.uk/housing/housingresearch/housingstatistics/housingstatisticsby/stockincludingvacants/livetables/.
At regional level, additional information on the age, type and condition of vacant stock is available from the “English House Condition Survey” (EHCS).
The National Register of Social Housing collects the same data on vacant dwellings as it does on occupied dwellings. I refer the hon. Member to the answer given on 6 October 2008, Official Report, column 335W.
Faith Communities Capacity Building Fund
The Faith Communities Capacity Building Fund was distributed over the three years 2004-05 to 2007-08, in two rounds of funding. I have placed in the Library a list showing each organisation that received funding, the amount awarded and the purpose.
The fund had two categories: capacity building and inter faith activity. The purpose of the capacity building category was to help build the organisational capabilities of faith-based organisations, enabling them to play a fuller part in civil society by engaging more effectively with public authorities. Capacity building for the large grants was subdivided into three categories: leadership and management; relationships with local, regional or national Government; and mentoring smaller faith organisations. The purpose of the inter faith category was to improve cohesion between different faith groups and the wider community, thereby bringing people of different faiths together to promote mutual understanding, respect and co-operation.
Fire Services: Contracts
All major contracts with third party suppliers have now been signed.
In eight out of the nine Government office regions, regional control centre buildings have been built and leases have been signed. Three of these leases (in the north east, East Midlands and north west regions) have been assigned to the local authority controlled companies which will operate them. It is intended to assign the remaining leases, currently held by my Department, to the relevant local authority controlled company in due course.
In London, where the building is on track to be completed by February 2010, it is intended that the lease will be held by the London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority.
The Facilities Management contract has been signed for all the buildings.
There is a single IT contract for FiReControl between my Department and EADS Defence and Security which covers all Government office regions.
Fire Services: Working Hours
Yes. Those provisions include the right of individuals to opt out of the average weekly 48-hour limit on their working time.
Homebuy Scheme
(2) in which Homebuy schemes are potential homeowners permitted to seek a 100 per cent. mortgage.
The Government wish to offer every household the opportunity of sustainable home ownership. The Homebuy programme, which offers assistance on a shared ownership or shared equity basis, requires prospective purchasers to secure a mortgage from a conventional lender, registered with the Financial Services Authority, for their share of the purchase, which is less than 100 per cent. of the property value. It is for individual lenders to decide the level of mortgage they provide on this share.
Homelessness: Greater London
Information about English local housing authorities’ actions under the homelessness legislation (part 7 of the Housing Act 1996) is collected quarterly at local authority level. Data collected include the number of applicants accepted by local housing authorities as eligible for assistance, unintentionally homeless and in priority need, and therefore owed a main homelessness duty (to secure that suitable accommodation is available). These households are known as ‘accepted’ households.
In addition, some applicants may be found to be in priority need, but are not accepted as owed a main homelessness duty because they were found to be intentionally homeless. For these cases we do not hold the reason for priority need centrally.
Figures reported by each London local authority, for the last six month, 12 month and two year periods, are provided in a table which has been placed in the Library. These show the number of applicants who were: (a) assessed as being homeless and in priority need; of which those (b) accepted as owed a main homelessness duty; and of which those that were (c) vulnerable though (i) having served in HM forces, (ii) having been on remand or in custody, and (iii) being a former asylum seeker (since April 2000, asylum seekers have been ineligible for assistance under the homelessness legislation, with certain exceptions where an asylum claim had been made prior to 3 April 2000).
However, it is important to note that some applicants who had previously been in the HM forces, on remand or in custody, or are a former asylum seeker, may have been accepted with alternative primary priority needs (for example through having dependent children or being a pregnant woman) and so will not be shown as being priority need for these reasons.
Housing North West
None of the Government Office regions have regional housing partnerships similar to the North West, although there are regional partnerships in London and the West Midlands.
In London the Mayor has established the Mayor’s Housing Forum (MHF). The primary role of the MHF is to act as an advisory body to the Mayor in the development of the Mayor’s Housing Strategy and its implementation. It also aims to share information and develop ideas about key housing issues in London and to receive and consider key documentation on research, strategies and policy initiatives; and the relevant strategies of member organisations.
The MHF is chaired by the Mayor’s Office and the Greater London authority provides the secretariat. The MHF meets quarterly.
In the West Midlands there are a series of three interrelated voluntary partnerships, who work together to deliver on the housing agenda.
Strategic Advisory Panel, which provides a wide forum for planning, environment and housing policy issues to be debated.
Regional housing executive oversees the development and delivery of the regional housing strategy, and recommends investment in line with the regional housing strategy.
West Midlands Regional Housing Advisory Forum; this is an officer-led partnership group, which supports the activities of the regional housing executive.
The partnerships are all voluntary and receive no funding.
Housing: Construction
The following information provides by region the proposed targets for the number of new dwellings to be built annually in the most recent RSSs; and the plan period they cover.
North East
7,425 new dwellings per year until 2021
North West
23,111 new dwellings per year until 2021
Yorkshire and Humber
22,260 new dwellings per year until 2026
West Midlands
18,280 new dwellings per year until 2026
East Midlands
20,418 new dwellings per year until 2026
East of England
26,830 new dwellings per year until 2021
South West
20,200 new dwelling per year until 2016
South East
28,904 new dwellings per year until 2026
Planning Policy Statement 3: Housing (PPS3) says that Local Development Documents and Regional Spatial Strategies should be informed by a robust, shared evidence base including a Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA). The table has been deposited in the Library showing the latest information we have on when local authorities completed or expect to complete their SHLAA. This information was provided by local authorities in April 2008 to inform payments of the Housing and Planning Delivery Grant. The South East, South West and North West regions updated their information in February 2009. We will be updating all our information on the completion of SHLAAs within the next few months to inform the next round of the Housing and Planning Delivery Grant.
Affordable Housing
The Homes and Communities Agency has made allocations in the 2008-11 affordable housing programme of £3.016 million in West Lancashire. In addition £0.618 million has been allocated for Homebuy Direct.
Land: Databases
All members of the Pan-Government Agreement for geographic data will have access to products provided by both Ordnance Survey and the Landmark-Dotted Eyes consortium from 1 April 2009.
The 96 members will be:
4NW
Advantage West Midlands
Amgueddfa Cymru—National Museum Wales
Arts Council of Wales
Audit Commission
Boundary Commission for Wales
British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC)
British Geological Survey (BGS)
Potato Council Ltd.
British Waterways
Cabinet Office
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH)
Charity Commission
Church Commissioners
Coal Authority (The)
Commission for Rural Communities
Communities and Local Government
Consumer Council for Water
Consumer Focus
Countryside Council for Wales (CCW)
Crown Estate (The)
Defence Estates (DE)
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (DBERR)
Department for Children, Schools and Families
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra)
Department for Transport (DfT)
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)
Department of Health (DH)
East Midlands Development Agency (EMDA)
East Midlands Regional Assembly
East of England Development Agency
East of England Regional Assembly
Electoral Commission (The)
English Heritage
Homes and Communities Agency
Environment Agency (EA)
Food Standards Agency (The)
Forensic Intelligence Bureau
Forestry Commission
Government Offices Regional Coordination Unit (RCU)
Health and Safety Executive (HSE)
Health Protection Agency
Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC)
Higher Education Funding Council for Wales
Highways Agency
Home Office
House of Commons Library
Information Centre for Health and Social Care
Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC)
Land Registry
Local Government Boundary Commission for Wales
London Thames Gateway Development Corporation
Maritime and Coastguard Agency
Met Office
Ministry of Defence
Ministry of Justice
National Assembly for Wales Parliamentary Service
National Audit Office
National Housing and Planning Advice Unit
National Policing Improvement Agency (NPIA)
Natural England
NHS Connecting for Health
NHS Counter Fraud and Security Management Service
North East Regional Assembly
North West Regional Development Agency
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA)
Office for National Statistics (ONS)
Office of Communications (Ofcom)
Office of Government Commerce (OGC)
Oil and Pipelines Agency
Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA)
One North East
Planning Portal
Royal Commission on the Ancient and Historical Monuments of Wales (RCAHMW)
Royal Parks (The)
Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA)
South East England Development Agency (SEEDA)
South East England Regional Assembly
South West Observatory
South West Regional Assembly
South West Regional Development Agency (SWRDA)
Sport England
Sports Council for Wales
Tenant Services Authority
The National Library of Wales
Training and Development Agency for Schools
Tribunals Service
UK Border Agency
Valuation Office Agency (VOA)
Wales Audit Office
Wales Centre for Health (WCfH)
Welsh Assembly Government
Welsh Health Estates
West Midlands Regional Assembly
Yorkshire and Humber Assembly
Yorkshire Forward
Legal Opinion
External legal advice has been commissioned on the following topics;
Fire Control Project
Housing Mobility Project
General Minor Legal Expenses
Geographic Data Licensing Project
Firelink Project
Commission for Equality and Human Rights Setup Project
Fire Research Project
It Services Outsourcing Project
Planning Portal Project
Housing Information Pack Register Project
Land Registry Fees
Gypsy and Traveller Sites Grant Project
Green Flag Project
A detailed breakdown of this list could be achieved only at disproportionate cost.
Licensed Premises: Planning Permission
A copy of the Inspector’s decision has been placed in the Library. It is also publicly available through the Planning Portal website:
www.planningportal.gov.uk
decision reference 2081980.
Local Government
The Strategy Unit seminar “Where next for local government?” is being rescheduled and new dates are yet to be confirmed. As the event is yet to be scheduled, the TSA have not prepared any materials for circulation. Further information about the Strategy Unit and their programme of seminars can be found on the Strategy Unit website at:
http://www.cabinetofiice.gov.uk/strategy.aspx
Local Government Finance
The consultation document on local spending reports was published on 20 February 2009. Copies have been placed in the Library of the House.
The basis for repayments of amounts overpaid in relation to fees and charges and to council tax is not set out in guidance issued by the Department.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave the right hon. Member for East Yorkshire (Mr. Knight) on 12 January 2009, Official Report, column 242W.
Local Government: Bank Services
Decisions on investment policy are a matter for individual authorities who must have regard to investment guidance issued by my Department.
On part (a), my Department did not receive, nor would we expect to have received, information from any source on the Icelandic banks. As the Department’s investment guidance, published in 2004, makes very clear investment decisions are a matter for the local authorities concerned,
On part (b) the Audit Commission has confirmed that it did not receive, nor would expect to receive, information from the sources named in the question regarding investments in Icelandic banks.
Local Government: Pay
Local authorities are currently required to report the number of staff earning over £50,000 per annum in their annual accounts.
Local Government: Pensions
The Department does not at present hold copies of all of the governance statements. Once we have received all of the statements we will be publishing a report on our website. Copies can be obtained from each administering authority who are in any event required to publish them.
The pension manager of each fund is designated as the relevant administrator of each of the eighty-nine Local Government Pension Scheme funds in England and Wales. Contact details can be found at:
www.lge.gov.uk/lge/core.
Schedule 4, parts 1 and 2, of the Local Government Pension Scheme (Administration) Regulations 2008 set out the requirements on which individual fund, employers contribute to their respective pension funds. Details of these employers are not held centrally.
(2) whether councillor members of joint waste authorities are eligible to join the Local Government Pension Scheme in their capacity as members of such authorities; and what powers such authorities have to admit them to membership.
Only elected members of a district council, county council or London borough council are defined as eligible members for the purpose of access to the Local Government Pension Scheme.
Decisions on access for councillors to the scheme are made by each local authority in the light of recommendations from its independent remuneration panel. There is no requirement to provide details to the Department of who has taken up any subsequent right of access.
A copy of CIPFA’s report “Local Government Pension Scheme Investment Regulations: Options for Change” was submitted to the Department on 27 January. The report will be treated as a response to the current statutory consultation exercise on the consolidation of the scheme’s investment regulations, which is due to close on 3 April 2009.
We will consider its recommendations carefully.
The Local Government Association recently expressed its support to see an increase in the scheme’s retirement age from 65, as part of a response made by the Local Government Employers to a statutory consultation exercise on proposals to introduce cost-share arrangements in the Local Government Pension Scheme later this year.
Mortgages
This information is not collected by Communities and Local Government. However for the UK we have made the following estimates based on data from the Regulated Mortgage Survey and the Council of Mortgage Lenders.
House price to income ratio Less than or equal to 6 Greater than 6 but no more than 8 Greater than 8but no more than 10 Greater than 10 Total 1997 1,050,746 31,656 11,230 9,963 1,103,595 1998 1,030,377 35,115 11,600 11,179 1,088,271 1999 1,179,639 44,620 15,464 14,175 1,253,898 2000 1,043,624 47,181 16,815 15,341 1,122,960 2001 1,207,137 64,580 21,093 20,901 1,313,711 2002 1,249,509 89,449 30,076 27,761 1,396,795 2003 1,025,385 130,147 50,201 46,184 1,251,917 2004 935,632 174,841 71,398 62,931 1,244,801 2005 798,731 124,523 49,157 42,310 1,014,722 2006 924,932 120,789 42,352 37,937 1,126,010 2007 819,298 117,305 42,241 37,555 1,016,400 2008 410,779 62,897 22,513 20,111 516,300
House price to income ratio Less than or equal to 6 Greater than 6 but no more than 8 Greater than 8 but no more than 10 Greater than 10 Total 1997 95.2 2.9 1.0 0.9 100 1998 94.7 3.2 1.1 1.0 100 1999 94.1 3.6 1.2 1.1 100 2000 92.9 4.2 1.5 1.4 100 2001 91.9 4.9 1.6 1.6 100 2002 89.5 6.4 2.2 2.0 100 2003 81.9 10.4 4.0 3.7 100 2004 75.2 14.0 5.7 5.1 100 2005 78.7 12.3 4.8 4.2 100 2006 82.1 10.7 3.8 3.4 100 2007 80.6 11.5 4.2 3.7 100 2008 79.6 12.2 4.4 3.9 100 Source: Regulated Mortgage Survey and Council of Mortgage Lenders
Mortgages: Government Assistance
We are currently working with lenders to agree the Master Guarantee for the Homeowner Mortgage Support Scheme, which we expect to be open for business with the first lenders in April. We will publish a full impact assessment when the Master Guarantee Deed has been finalised.
We are making good progress on the implementation of the Homeowner Mortgage Support scheme and expect the scheme to be open for business with the first lenders in April now that the Banking Act, which is the legislative vehicle we have used to enable us to do this, has gained Royal Assent (12 February). We are now working with a wider group of lenders to finalise the scheme implementation plans and agree the draft Master Guarantee.
Multiple Occupation: Fire Prevention
The Department has worked closely with LACORS (Local Authority Co-ordinators of Regulatory Services), the Chartered Institute of Environmental Health and the Chief Fire Officers Association who published guidance on fire safety provisions for certain types of existing housing, including houses in multiple occupation. This can be found on the LACORS website:
www.lacors.gov.uk
The Department has commissioned an initial evaluation of the effectiveness of fire safety legislation, the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005. This includes the perspective of the responsible persons, the enforcing authorities and the fire industry. We will publish the outcome of this evaluation shortly and will put a copy in the House of Commons Library.
National Community Forum
In the past 12 months the National Community Forum has held three meetings. The meetings were held in April 2008 (quarterly meeting), October 2008(annual residential meeting) and January 2009 (sub-groups meeting). I have placed copies of the minutes in the Library.
Non-Domestic Rates: Business
If the retail price index inflation in September 2009 is negative it will have a reducing impact on the multiplier for 2010-11.
The Department does not collect this information, as businesses within the BID area decide on the amount of the levy and vote in a ballot on whether the scheme should go ahead. The size and calculation of the BID levy varies widely between BIDs. The levy is collected by the billing authority and held in a separate BIDs Revenue Account where it is ring-fenced and can only be used for the BID.
For England, I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave the hon. Member for Bromley and Chislehurst (Robert Neill) on 19 January 2009, Official Report, column 1081W.
Business rates in Wales are the responsibility of the Welsh Assembly Government.
Non-Domestic Rates: Empty Property
No, small business rate relief applies to occupied properties only.
Non-Domestic Rates: Greater London
Non-Domestic Rates: Ports
There has not been a specific assessment of the impact of the review of business rates in ports on yacht clubs or fishing companies.
Non-Domestic Rates: Valuation
There is no classification of the codes used by the VOA to group properties for sub-locations. The sub-location codes are simply unique labels for a particular category of property having similar characteristics.
Owner Occupation
The information requested is not readily available for the United Kingdom.
Estimates of the number of owner occupying households in England who were (a) outright owners and (b) buying with a mortgage are set out in the following table. Estimates are available for 1981, 1984, 1988 and all years from 1991 onwards.
Thousands of households Owner occupiers Own outright Buying with a mortgage All owner occupiers 1981 4,313 5,546 9,860 1984 4,590 6,399 10,990 1988 4,834 7,414 12,248 1991 4,795 8,255 13,050 1992 4,815 8,255 13,069 1993 4,898 8,382 13,280 1994 5,008 8,421 13,429 1995 4,998 8,468 13,467 1996 5,115 8,407 13,521 1997 5,249 8,380 13,629 1998 5,404 8,413 13,817 1999 5,582 8,508 14,091 2000 5,764 8,575 14,339 2001 5,885 8,473 14,358 2002 6,019 8,540 14,559 2003 6,158 8,542 14,701 2004 6,288 8,389 14,677 2005 6,352 8,440 14,791 2006 6,425 8,365 14,790 2007 6,505 8,228 14,733 2008 6,653 7,975 14,628 Sources: 1981 to 1991: DOE Labour Force Survey Housing Trailer 1992 to 2008: ONS Labour Force Survey.
Planning Permission
Every local authority is required to adopt a code of conduct that sets out rules governing the behaviour of its members. The Standards Board for England, sponsored by Communities and Local Government, is responsible for promoting and improving the ethical behaviour of local authorities and their members. It publishes a range of guidance documents to help local authorities and their members interpret the code of conduct, including the revised “Code of Conduct—A Guide for Members”, published in May 2007. In August 2007, the Board published an Occasional Paper, “Predisposition, Pre-determination and the Code”, to help clarify the issues of predetermination and bias.
In October 2008, Communities and Local Government issued “Guidance on Planning and Propriety Issues”, which deals with the propriety issues that can arise in connection with the Secretary of State exercising decision-making functions under the Town and Country Planning Acts.
Since 2005, under a provision in the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, the default period for the implementation of a planning permission has been three years. The Act also amended primary legislation so that a planning permission could no longer be extended by an application to vary a condition. The Department has received representations in the last six months on extending the period before the expiry of planning permissions from the Local Government Association, the Confederation of British Industry and the British Property Federation.
There have been two special development orders made in England since 1997. These were the Town and Country Planning (London Borough of Camden) Special Development Order 2004 (SI 2004/1231) and the Town and Country Planning (London Borough of Camden) Special Development (Amendment) Order 2004 (SI 2004/2355). The first order made provision for publicity for some planning applications (within the designated area) to be advertised on the internet. The amending order made an alteration as to compliance within the 21 day period for the display of notices, where notices are removed, obscured or defaced.
Planning Permission: Fees and Charges
Where the proposed fishing lake to be constructed is part of an aftercare condition attached to a permission for mineral extraction, a planning application fee would be charged under Category 9 (a) (fees category for mineral extraction) of Schedule 1, Part 2 of the Town and Country Planning (Fees for Applications and Deemed Applications (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2008). The mineral planning authority may also charge a fee for site visits to monitor the mineral permission during the aftercare period.
Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre
As was announced in the November 2008 pre-Budget report, Ministers concluded that there was no public policy rationale for the Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre to remain in Government ownership. Alternatives to public ownership are under consideration, and an update will be provided in the 2009 Budget report.
Recycling
Yes. National Indicator 192—Percentage of household waste sent for reuse, recycling and composting—does include materials collected from street recycling bins. Full definitions of the National Indicator set are set out in the “National Indicators for Local Authorities and Local Authority Partnerships: Handbook of Definitions”, available on the CLG website at:
http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/localgovernment/finalnationalindicators
Rented Housing
(2) what her policy is on the alignment of tenancy terms proposed by the Law Commission.
The proposals in the Law Commission’s Rented Homes Bill were considered as part of the Review of the Private Rented Sector which we commissioned Julie Rugg and David Rhodes to carry out last year. We will be responding formally to the review in the spring. That response will incorporate our response to the Law Commission’s recommendations, including their proposals on the alignment of tenancy terms.
Rented Housing: Rent Deposit Schemes
We do not have official figures on the number of local housing authorities who run rent deposit schemes. However, in 2007 Communities and Local Government published a homelessness prevention survey submitted by 301 local authorities, representing 85 per cent. of the total. 201 authorities reported that they had rent deposit schemes in place and a further 45 authorities reported that they were planning to have rent deposit schemes in place. This shows that private rented accommodation is an effective housing option for preventing homelessness and provides a viable alternative to social housing.
The Government take all aspects of homelessness very seriously. We have allocated over £200 million to local authorities and voluntary organisations over the next three years (2008-11) to tackle and prevent homelessness in their area effectively. This is the biggest ever cash injection for homelessness services. Local organisations decide, based on local circumstances, how to use those resources to prevent homelessness.
Social Rented Housing
Information about lettings to local authority landlords is collected via the Housing Strategy Statistical Appendix (HSSA). Estimates of lettings made to people ‘other than homeless applicants’ have been calculated using the total number of all local authority lettings made to both new and existing social housing tenants (but excluding mutual exchanges) less the number of lettings made to households owed the main homelessness duty (section 193(2) of the Housing Act 1996).
Table 1 shows the percentage of all local authority lettings made to households who were not owed the main homelessness duty for each region from 2000-01 to 2007-08.
2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 North East 90.7 88.8 87.1 80.6 79.7 83.1 83.9 85.7 North West 89.7 88.3 85.4 84.7 78.3 76.9 78.7 82.5 Yorkshire and the Humber 87.0 86.1 80.5 75.0 74.8 77.7 79.9 71.8 East Midlands 85.2 82.3 81.3 81.2 78.7 82.5 83.1 83.7 West Midlands 81.1 76.5 73.5 68.5 70.1 74.3 74.7 74.6 East of England 74.6 69.5 65.1 76.9 77.0 80.1 80.7 82.2 London 53.4 50.2 51.1 60.6 61.7 64.8 68.3 67.7 South East 67.3 62.6 62.9 79.0 77.6 80.1 81.5 79.9 South West 71.0 67.4 63.4 69.3 73.7 71.5 77.8 84.0 England 79.9 77.1 74.3 75.2 74.1 76.4 78.2 78.2 Notes: 1. The denominator ‘all lettings’ includes lets made to both new and existing social housing tenants, but excludes mutual exchanges. 2. The figures include general needs and supported housing lets. Source: Housing Strategy Statistical Appendix, derived from reported data from local authorities.
Table 2 shows the percentage of all local authority lettings made to households who were not owed the main homelessness duty for each local authority in London from 2000-01 to 2007-08.
2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 Barking and Dagenham 86.7 76.8 69.3 76.6 65.1 95.4 91.3 84.3 Barnet 36.7 34.2 27.3 62.8 70.7 76.8 78.9 65.8 Bexley — — — — — — — — Brent 46.7 34.2 46.0 51.0 58.2 44.1 54.4 53.9 Bromley — — — — — — — — Camden 62.0 64.0 49.8 63.0 61.6 62.5 79.6 85.9 City of London 91.1 93.6 87.4 94.4 90.9 93.1 92.2 95.3 Croydon 18.5 26.2 60.0 83.6 82.5 86.3 83.7 75.6 Ealing 48.2 47.5 43.8 43.4 63.0 55.5 55.4 56.2 Enfield 61.4 50.8 48.4 51.5 53.7 54.8 51.6 57.7 Greenwich 55.3 62.8 63.2 59.7 64.3 67.4 70.6 74.1 Hackney 67.7 39.2 38.2 52.3 54.2 57.7 58.2 41.2 Hammersmith and Fulham 63.0 48.4 44.0 62.6 65.9 75.1 60.0 57.5 Haringey 30.3 75.8 66.2 60.6 57.1 52.7 70.6 54.9 Harrow 45.9 61.6 61.9 63.8 67.1 69.0 63.9 59.8 Havering 100.0 77.1 78.3 99.5 72.0 91.1 50.4 99.3 Hillingdon 42.1 68.2 45.7 53.2 65.2 73.9 64.5 74.8 Hounslow 50.8 42.7 54.0 47.4 37.3 52.4 56.3 57.7 Islington 44.8 43.9 43.6 40.9 51.9 61.4 61.8 64.1 Kensington and Chelsea 62.4 73.1 62.5 66.5 60.9 54.6 80.5 57.9 Kingston upon Thames 53.4 43.3 42.0 48.0 49.0 56.3 59.9 57.9 Lambeth 52.6 34.7 34.6 42.1 40.3 32.8 45.2 58.5 Lewisham 70.1 65.2 58.1 58.9 53.7 77.1 84.2 58.2 Merton 85.3 78.3 77.3 73.1 66.6 70.0 85.4 94.9 Newham 38.4 33.9 61.8 85.6 87.3 82.2 79.6 77.1 Redbridge 58.7 66.6 63.2 71.5 81.2 80.3 68.5 73.7 Richmond upon Thames 45.3 — — — — — — — Southwark 53.6 37.4 41.3 47.0 51.5 61.4 76.6 80.6 Sutton 35.9 39.0 43.2 91.0 83.0 77.4 81.7 80.0 Tower Hamlets 39.3 34.8 39.1 67.5 73.6 41.7 66.0 67.0 Waltham Forest 34.8 33.7 32.6 52.0 62.9 54.8 46.1 50.9 Wandsworth 56.7 50.3 59.3 63.2 63.5 60.4 40.8 44.3 Westminster 45.1 43.2 51.6 43.3 51.3 50.2 63.5 56.2 London 53.4 50.2 51.1 60.6 61.7 64.8 68.3 67.7 ‘—’ Indicates no local authority lettings were made due to local authority having undergone a large scale voluntary transfer (LSVT). Notes: 1. The denominator ‘all lettings’ includes lets made to both new and existing social housing tenants, but excludes mutual exchanges. 2. The figures include general needs and supported housing lets. Source: Housing Strategy Statistical Appendix, derived from reported data from local authorities.
Information about lettings to registered social landlords (RSLs) is collected through the Continuous Recordings of Lettings (CORE) system. Estimates of lettings to people ‘other than homeless applicants’ have been calculated using the total number of all registered social landlord lettings made to both new and existing social housing tenants less the number of lettings recorded as being made to households owed the main homelessness duty (section 193(2) of the Housing Act 1996) and who were recorded as having been referred or nominated by a local authority.
Table 3 shows the percentage of all registered social landlord lettings made to households who were not owed the main homelessness duty for each region from 2000-01 to 2007-08.
2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 North East 96.6 96.8 94.5 92.5 92.1 91.1 91.1 88.8 North West 95.3 94.6 95.2 93.9 93.3 91.9 91.4 91.5 Yorkshire and the Humber 95.1 95.3 94.7 95.1 94.3 93.0 92.5 90.9 East Midlands 93.8 93.3 92.2 90.1 91.6 89.6 88.7 88.6 West Midlands 93.8 92.5 91.6 89.8 88.0 89.0 89.6 89.3 East of England 90.6 88.9 86.1 84.1 85.5 84.1 83.1 84.8 London 85.5 85.5 84.9 84.5 84.9 84.6 82.1 81.8 South East 86.6 85.8 85.0 83.7 85.9 85.7 85.4 85.4 South West 85.1 84.4 84.0 82.0 83.2 83.3 83.9 82.5 England 91.1 90.6 89.9 88.6 88.6 88.1 87.6 87.3 Notes: 1. The denominator ‘all lettings’ includes lets made to both new and existing social housing tenants. 2. RSLs with less than 250 units are not required to complete CORE returns. 3. The figures include general needs and supported housing lets. Source: CORE
Table 4 shows the percentage of all registered social landlord lettings made to households who were not owed the main homelessness duty, for each local authority in London from 2000-01 to 2007-08.
2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 Barking and Dagenham 95.0 97.1 96.5 96.1 94.2 75.5 89.0 85.1 Barnet 85.7 83.0 80.5 83.2 88.3 91.1 85.4 78.9 Bexley 77.7 74.8 76.9 80.0 80.9 87.5 82.7 87.3 Brent 83.2 82.6 72.5 78.6 84.8 83.9 81.9 76.8 Bromley 54.1 62.9 58.0 61.2 55.6 62.4 71.3 61.7 Camden 95.6 96.1 97.0 93.4 94.3 92.6 94.6 92.4 City of London 100.0 100.0 97.3 94.7 100.0 100.0 97.5 98.1 Croydon 85.0 84.8 79.0 81.6 86.3 84.1 83.2 83.8 Ealing 83.9 82.9 79.5 71.7 79.3 65.8 62.3 67.9 Enfield 76.0 82.5 75.3 86.1 87.1 85.6 71.6 63.4 Greenwich 94.5 93.0 93.8 93.8 93.4 93.7 88.4 92.6 Hackney 86.4 89.2 87.9 89.3 86.7 88.5 84.0 87.5 Hammersmith and Fulham 90.9 90.3 88.2 84.3 83.6 88.3 76.2 77.4 Haringey 79.6 74.0 76.9 76.9 86.2 84.4 72.3 73.7 Harrow 73.3 65.5 78.5 58.4 69.8 63.5 76.1 77.3 Havering 94.9 93.5 95.8 95.1 84.5 98.3 94.4 91.0 Hillingdon 69.9 70.5 77.4 81.8 76.6 73.5 76.6 74.1 Hounslow 68.0 80.0 77.3 76.4 74.6 80.1 74.3 71.0 Islington 91.3 89.7 87.5 86.0 90.5 92.4 85.1 85.8 Kensington and Chelsea 89.7 89.0 88.3 80.5 82.3 86.4 75.2 81.0 Kingston upon Thames 63.8 78.2 71.3 83.8 71.0 76.0 72.3 66.0 Lambeth 92.5 84.6 86.3 84.0 87.4 87.1 86.7 84.3 Lewisham 89.0 92.1 91.0 90.8 90.9 81.7 88.5 85.1 Merton 88.6 90.8 89.6 89.2 79.2 83.1 87.4 90.2 Newham 89.6 89.7 88.3 92.1 92.9 92.8 90.2 86.4 Redbridge 80.1 86.9 89.4 85.1 94.3 96.1 87.7 89.9 Richmond upon Thames 70.5 70.5 72.4 71.5 65.9 65.3 66.0 64.0 Southwark 90.3 84.1 90.5 85.7 85.1 84.1 80.8 84.8 Sutton 83.1 81.8 79.9 88.4 85.7 83.0 80.5 80.2 Tower Hamlets 91.8 90.1 90.9 91.6 87.4 85.6 80.8 82.5 Waltham Forest 89.1 78.5 82.9 84.6 90.5 90.8 73.4 78.0 Wandsworth 91.7 91.0 86.1 86.6 85.6 87.8 81.1 81.8 Westminster 89.7 92.5 94.3 92.5 93.7 91.2 94.2 91.1 London 85.5 85.5 84.9 84.5 84.9 84.6 82.1 81.8 Notes: 1. The denominator ‘all lettings’ includes lets made to both new and existing social housing tenants. 2. RSLs with less than 250 units are not required to complete CORE returns. 3. The figures include general needs and supported housing lets. Source: CORE
Social Rented Housing: Standards
The Government have no specific existing policy on the application of dwelling space standards for private sector homes. However, the Government’s Planning Policy Statement 3: “Housing” (PPS3) is clear on the need to achieve high quality new housing, including promoting designs and layouts which make efficient use of land, encouraging innovative approaches to help deliver high quality outcomes, and contribute positively to making places better for people.
The Government’s new delivery body, the Homes and Communities Agency (HCA) is currently reviewing the benchmarks for high quality urban design, construction and environmental sustainability, including any space standards for new homes funded by the public sector.
In the meantime the HCA is continuing to operate under the regimes set in place by the Housing Corporation and English Partnerships, whereby (i) Design and Quality Strategy and Standards set out the Housing Corporation’s requirements and recommendations for all housing projects which received Social Housing Grant, and (ii) Housing Quality Indicators set out English Partnership's requirements, both of which included a space standard.
Where local authorities build or acquire homes with funding from the HCA they are expected to meet the relevant conditions of the grant, and compliance with development standards is one of these.
Where HCA are purchasing stock from developers from the £200 million earmarked for this purpose, the Government have agreed that they may be flexible on design and quality standards to help house builders maintain housing production through the current difficult market conditions.
Sustainable Development
On 20 February 2009, the Government launched a consultation on the Sustainable Communities Act 2007: Local spending reports. In this consultation, the Department is seeking views on proposals for putting in place the first arrangements for local spending reports including which bodies, expenditure, spatial level and period should be covered by the reports, and also how the reports might develop over time. The consultation on the first arrangements closes on Friday 3 April, and on Friday 15 May for how the reports should be developed over time.
Copies of the consultation document have been placed in the Library of the House.
Travelling People
I have today placed a copy of the guidance document “Preparing Regional Spatial Strategy Reviews on Gypsies and Travellers provided by regional planning bodies” in the Library of the House.
Travelling People: Plymouth
The Secretary of State published for consultation proposed changes to the regional spatial strategy for the south-west on 22 July 2008. This set out a requirement for 40 additional residential pitches and 15 additional transit pitches in Plymouth. Responses to those proposed changes are being considered. The final regional spatial strategy, setting out the number of pitches required will be published later this year.
Urban Areas: Regeneration
(2) what the status of the proposed changes is to Planning Policy Statement 6, on planning for town centres; and when she plans to publish the results of the July 2008 consultation.
The proposed changes to Planning Policy Statement 6: Planning for Town Centres are currently in draft form. A revised version of the policy will be published later this spring.
A summary of the responses to the July 2008 consultation was published on the Department’s website on 4 February 2009. The information is available at:
http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/pps6responses.pdf
Valuation Office: Rightmove
The Valuation Office Agency makes use of a range of freely available sources of information from the estate agent industry across England (and Wales). A full list could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Health
Autism: Hertfordshire
The information requested is not held centrally.
Broomfield Hospital: Cancer
The information requested is not held centrally.
Broomfield Hospital: Manpower
The information requested is not held centrally. The comprehensive spending review (CSR) funding settlement includes £270 million per year by 2010-11 to tackle healthcare associated infections (HCAIs). In 2008-09, the additional funding is reflected in the 5.5 per cent., increase in primary care trust (PCT) allocations and the 2.3 per cent. uplift to the national tariff (the latter specifically recognising the importance of tackling HCAIs and improving cleanliness).
The additional funding is not ring fenced, but rather is reflected in the 5.5 per cent., increase to PCT revenue allocations in 2008-09. In addition, the national tariff uplift for 2008-09 has an element that specifically recognises the importance of tackling infections and improving cleanliness. This means that all national health service organisations can afford to make significant investment and continue to make progress.
Some of the funding will be spent on implementing national policy—such as the requirement for all relevant elective patients to be screened for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from April 2009 and for emergency admissions as soon as possible within the next three years.
Other areas where additional funding can be invested will be left to local discretion, but “clean, safe care” guides the local NHS as to areas where this will have the most impact—such as investing in specialist staff. The Government’s CSR settlement allows for up to £45 million for this purpose, which could for example deliver two infection control nurses, one pharmacist and two nurses to care for patients in isolation, alongside additional infection control nurses in every community. As there is a shortage of trained staff in some areas, trusts may want to recruit to posts in infection control teams and train up additional infection control nurses.
Dental Services
The exact information is not held centrally. Hospital Episode Statistics show the dental procedure carried out, but not whether a general anaesthetic was administered. However, dental treatment under general anaesthesia may only take place in a hospital setting that has a critical-care facility. It is therefore very likely, though not absolutely certain that a child admitted to hospital for extraction of teeth will have had general anaesthetic, and that was the reason for their admission to hospital. A table which contains the number of hospital episodes involving the extraction of teeth by age group and primary care trust has been placed in the Library.
I refer the hon. Member to the written answer I gave him on 24 February 2009, Official Report, column 661W.
(2) whether he expects the cost of a dental check-up with an NHS dentist to include (a) treatment by an hygienist and (b) a scale and polish; and if he will make a statement.
This information is not held centrally. National health service dental contracts require dentists to provide all proper clinically necessary dental care and treatment that the patient is willing to undergo. Which dental professional delivers the treatment is a clinical matter for the practice. A Band 1 course of treatment (diagnosis, treatment planning and maintenance) includes examination, diagnosis (for example x-rays), advice on how to prevent future problems, and scaling and polishing if clinically needed. Fee paying NHS patients will be charged £16.20 for a Band 1 course of treatment. Those exempt from NHS charges receive treatment without charge.
Patients who are assessed as not clinically needing a scale and polish are free to obtain it privately. As with any treatment if there is no clinical need for the patient to receive a scale and polish it is entirely appropriate that it is provided, if at all, outside the NHS.
Dental Services: Peterborough
The primary dental service funding allocations made to Peterborough Primary Care Trust (PCT) for the three years 2006-07 to 2008-09 are in the following table. These are net of income from dental charges paid by patients, which are retained locally to supplement the resources available for dentistry. Actual expenditure levels are determined by the pattern and type of services commissioned by each PCT. PCTs may also dedicate some of their other national health service resources to dentistry if they consider this an appropriate local priority.
Allocation (£000) 2006-07 7,967 2007-08 8,324 2008-09 9,158 Notes: 1. The allocation figure for 2006-07 is the aggregate of the allocations made initially to the North and South Peterborough PCTs before they merged to form the Peterborough PCT with effect from 1 October 2006. 2. PCTs are awarded separate funding allocations to meet the cost of any dental vocational trainees who may be placed with dental practices in their area. 3. Full allocation details for all PCTs for 2009-10 will be confirmed shortly, but the allocation for Peterborough PCT will be reduced by a transfer of £467,000 to Cambridgeshire PCT in line with an agreement between the two PCTs on a more appropriate distribution of resources to reflect their respective cross border service responsibilities.
Diabetes
(2) what his Department’s policy is on the disposal of clinical waste arising from the management of diabetes; and if he will make a statement. [R]
Information about which primary care trusts have established policies on accepting diabetic clinical waste at general practitioner surgeries is not held centrally.
The Department published “Health Technical Memorandum 07-01: Safe management of healthcare waste” (copies of which have been placed the Library) to give clarification and advice to community healthcare professionals involved in the care of self-medicating patients, such as people with diabetes. It includes:
“Self-medicating patients and sharps disposal
19. Where the householder is a self-medicating patient who uses injectables (for example a person with diabetes) with no healthcare worker involved in the administration, the GP or healthcare worker should prescribe the householder the appropriate container (for example a sharps box) and advise them of local disposal options.”
Drugs: Rehabilitation
(2) how many residential drug treatment places his Department plans to fund in (a) 2010 and (b) 2011.
The Department does not directly fund any residential rehabilitation. Decisions on how many residential drug treatment places to fund are made by local commissioning partnerships based on assessed local need and individually assessed client need. This information is not available centrally.
However, the national drug treatment monitoring system (NDTMS), managed by the National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse (NTA), does collect data on the number of individuals receiving residential treatment. Latest figures show that in 2007-08, 4,306 adults were recorded in residential rehabilitation and 6,742 adults received in-patient services in hospital.
It is important to note that there is known under-reporting of referral data to the NDTMS, and so any figures regarding this sector are likely to be an under estimate of activity. As such, the data the NTA collects through the NDTMS is not a complete or accurate picture.
Waiting times data for residential drug treatment places has been supplied previously and I refer my hon. Friend to the answer I gave him on 5 March 2009, Official Report, column 1765W.
Gynaecology
Premature ovarian failure (also called premature or early menopause) is defined as the onset of menopause before the age of 45 and affects at most 1 per cent. of women.
The management of women with premature ovarian failure is part of the core curriculum for training of all gynaecologists. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists held a public meeting ‘Premature menopause - A Change too soon' on 3 November 2007.
The Daisy Network Premature Menopause Support Group supports and gives advice to women who have experienced premature menopause.
Heart Diseases
The following table provides data from the East of England strategic health authority (SHA) (which includes West Chelmsford constituency). We are unable to break the data down into individual constituencies. The East of England strategic health authority was formed in 2006-07 by a merger of Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire; Essex; and Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire. Figures for 2003-04 to 2005-06 were calculated by summing these three together. It shows the number of males under the age of 35 years old who were admitted to hospital due to a heart attack:
East of England SHA1 England 2007-08 47 348 2006-07 40 343 2005-06 48 369 2004-05 43 368 2003-04 37 335 1 Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire; Essex; and Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire prior to 2006-07 Notes: Finished admission episodes: A finished admission episode is the first period of inpatient care under one consultant within one healthcare provider. Finished admission episodes are counted against the year in which the admission episode finishes. Admissions do not represent the number of inpatients, as a person may have more than one admission within the year. Primary diagnosis: The primary diagnosis is the first of up to 20 (14 from 2002-03 to 2006-07 and 7 prior to 2002-03) diagnosis fields in the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data set and provides the main reason why the patient was admitted to hospital. The ICD-10 codes used to identify heart attacks are as follows: I21—acute myocardial infarction I22—subsequent myocardial infarction Number of episodes in which the patient had a (named) primary diagnosis: These figures represent the number of episodes where the diagnosis was recorded in the primary diagnosis field in a HES record. Data quality: HES are compiled from data sent by more than 300 national health service trusts and primary care trusts (PCTs) in England. Data are also received from a number of independent sector organisations for activity commissioned by the English NHS. The NHS information centre for health and social care liaises closely with these organisations to encourage submission of complete and valid data and seeks to minimise inaccuracies and the effect of missing and invalid via HES processes. While this brings about improvement over time, some shortcomings remain. Source: Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), the NHS information centre for health and social care.
Hospital Wards
A number of milestones have been agreed that relate both to the Department's programme plan for eliminating mixed sex accommodation and to the use of the associated ‘Privacy and Dignity' fund.
The milestones for the Privacy and Dignity fund are:
strategic health authority (SHA) plans will be submitted to the Department by 9 March 2009;
departmental ratification of the plans (which are to set out specific projects and timelines for improvements in the SHA regions) will take place in order to release the funds from 1 April 2009; and
local improvements and changes must be implemented by the end of June 2009.
SHAs will report to the Department every two weeks following the submission, and approval, of their local plans, confirming actions taken and variance from the planned milestones. The Department will also require a report from each SHA confirming the delivery of the plan by the beginning of July 2009.
Use of the privacy and dignity fund is likely to be informed by the requirement set out in the Operating Framework for the NHS 2009-10, that
“PCTs are expected to work with their local providers to deliver substantial and meaningful reductions in the number of patients who report that they share sleeping or sanitary accommodation with members of the opposite sex”.
PCTs are asked to ensure plans will be published by the end of March 2009.
The programme for eliminating mixed sex accommodation comprises four workstreams; to raise the focus, develop metrics assurance, facilitate spread of good practice and deliver targeted support. The key milestones themselves include:
establishment of an operations team and a broader programme governance infrastructure (February 2009);
compilation of a communications strategy (March 2009);
begin improvement team's engagement with trusts requiring support (March 2009)
publishing a root cause analysis toolkit for local use by the NHS (April 2009);
‘sharing good practice' event, (by end June 2009); and
phased handover of improvement activity to local health community arrangements (from June 2009 onwards).
The Department: will consider the outcome of inpatient surveys in assessing the success of these changes.
Malnutrition
(2) how frequently the analysis referred to is undertaken; and if he will make a statement.
The General Practice Research Database (GPRD) is a collection of data from general practices selected to be as geographically demographically representative as possible of the UK. The age and gender distribution is similar to that as detailed by the Office for National Statistics on the basis of census data. GPRD practices are provided with recording guidelines against which data quality is monitored.
The GPRD contains records of patients recorded as suffering from malnutrition under a range of different terms, known as ‘Read Terms'. There are many thousands of Read codes in total, and 24 separate codes relating to malnutrition. This range of different codes is designed to allow the general practitioner (GP) to record the condition at different levels of specificity of disease. The Read code used is at the discretion of the GP and is based on their diagnosis of the patient's condition
The data as previously given are a reasonable population based estimate of the level of malnutrition, as recorded within primary care data, based upon the GPRD sample size.
The analysis undertaken to count the number of such cases, in the GPRD, is not done routinely. It was done in response to a specific request. The analysis could be repeated at any time in the future.
Maternity Services: Finance
I refer the hon. Member to the written answer I gave him on 3 March 2009, Official Report, column 1478W.
Mental Health Services
The NHS Constitution sets out that patients have the right to drugs and treatments that have been recommended by a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) technology appraisal, if their doctor says they are clinically appropriate. This includes psychological therapies appraised by NICE. The right is underpinned by a statutory funding direction, in place since January 2002, which requires primary care trusts to make funding available for drugs and treatments recommended in a NICE technology appraisal, normally within three months of publication of the appraisal.
NHS: Lost Property
The information is not available and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
NHS: Negligence
The NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA) panel solicitors do not provide services to claimants therefore the amount paid by the NHSLA for clinical cases for their services provided to claimants is zero.
Providing data specifically for panel solicitors or for years prior to 1999 would be at disproportionate cost because the information is not readily accessible. Additionally, it is difficult to compare using information prior to 2002-03 because excess levels were operated on schemes, which means the data held do not cover all claims.
However, the NHSLA has provided the following table. The NHSLA does not have defence costs recorded prior to 1999 due to a change in accounting systems. Additionally, the NHSLA only records data by year for overall defence costs, which include barrister and medical expert fees alongside panel solicitors’ fees.
£000 Clinical negligence scheme for trusts Existing liabilities scheme Ex-regional health authorities Total clinical 1999-2000 2,166 22,435 691 25,292 2000-01 7,223 1185,651 765 193,639 2001-02 111,954 27,358 492 39,804 2002-03 35,919 21,905 398 58,222 2003-04 39,829 10,705 276 50,810 2004-05 40,016 12,206 206 52,428 2005-06 44,146 12,355 286 56,787 2006-07 43,334 10,162 244 53,740 2007-08 43,778 9,123 194 53,095 1 The NHSLA operated excess levels on two clinical schemes whereby trusts themselves handled and funded claims below the excess levels. The NHSLA does not hold data related to these claims. Excess levels for each of the two schemes were removed in the marked years and outstanding claims below excess were then fully funded by the schemes. These years therefore include reimbursement by the NHSLA of legal costs already paid by trusts against those claims. It will also include legal costs associated with solicitors not on the NHSLA’s panel because trusts were originally handling some of those claims themselves and will have appointed their own solicitors.
The information requested was obtained from the NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA) and is provided in the following table. Claimants are not required to provide details of their funding arrangements, but the NHSLA records this where it is known.
Claimant funding Total Before the Event Insurance 847 Conditional Fee Arrangement 3,743 Legal Services Commission 4,697 Self-funded 798 Unknown 1,453 Grand total 11,538
The information requested was obtained from the NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA) and is provided in the following table. Claimants are not required to provide details of their funding arrangements, but the NHSLA records this where it is known.
Claimant funding Total Before the Event Insurance 418 Conditional Fee Arrangement 1,896 Legal Services Commission 1,209 Self-funded 679 Unknown 1,014 Grand total 5,216
The information requested was obtained from the NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA) and is provided in the following table. Claimants are not required to provide details of their funding arrangements, but the NHSLA records this where it is known.
Claimant funding Damages awarded No damages Grand total Before the Event Insurance 287 91 378 Conditional Fee Arrangement 1,132 438 1,570 Legal Services Commission 1,133 803 1,936 Self-funded 425 286 711 Unknown 495 1,089 1,584 Grand total 3,472 2,707 6,179
NHS: Pensions
Current Social Security legislation provides for public service pensions to be adjusted by the same rate as the State Second Pension, and for such adjustments to take place only if there has been an increase in prices over a given period.
NHS: Public Appointments
This information is not collected centrally.
NHS: Redundancy Pay
Unfortunately the information does not exist in the format requested.
The Department collected data on the value of redundancies and early retirements due to primary care trust (PCT) reorganisation in 2006-07, but we cannot separate the redundancy element from these figures. However, the Department did collect these costs separately in 2007-08.
The information that the Department has collected is shown in the following table. Other restructuring costs include early retirement costs as well as other costs arising from the restructuring process.
The PCT reconfiguration programme was undertaken to help to improve relationships between health care and local authorities by bringing their boundaries closer together and to make savings to the local national health service by reducing management costs. These savings will be reinvested in front line services.
Name 2006-07 Redundancies and early retirements due to PCT reorganisation 2007-08 Redundancies due to PCT reorganisation 2007-08 Other restructuring costs due to PCT reorganisation Ashton, Leigh and Wigan PCT 0 0 0 Barking and Dagenham PCT 0 184 0 Barnet PCT 0 0 187 Barnsley PCT 0 6 0 Bassetlaw PCT 0 0 0 Bath and North East Somerset PCT 0 0 0 Bedfordshire PCT 701 203 0 Berkshire East PCT 17 500 0 Berkshire West PCT 523 116 1,415 Bexley NHS Care Trust PCT 39 0 0 Birmingham East and North PCT 0 0 0 Blackburn with Darwen PCT 0 0 0 Blackpool PCT 0 0 0 Bolton PCT 0 0 0 Bournemouth and Poole PCT 0 0 0 Bradford and Airedale PCT 2,142 900 0 Brent Teaching PCT 0 0 0 Brighton and Hove City PCT 0 0 0 Bristol PCT 0 0 0 Bromley PCT 0 0 0 Buckinghamshire PCT 0 100 0 Bury PCT 0 0 0 Calderdale PCT 0 0 0 Cambridgeshire PCT 1,023 0 0 Camden PCT 0 0 0 Central and Eastern Cheshire PCT 0 0 0 Central Lancashire PCT 2,675 0 0 City and Hackney Teaching PCT 0 0 0 Cornwall and Isles of Scilly PCT 0 0 0 County Durham PCT 4,118 1,803 0 Coventry Teaching PCT 0 1,000 0 Croydon PCT 0 0 0 Cumbria PCT 0 0 0 Darlington PCT 0 593 0 Derby City PCT 0 0 0 Derbyshire County PCT 405 0 0 Devon PCT 1,358 1,050 170 Doncaster PCT 0 0 0 Dorset PCT 506 1,356 0 Dudley PCT 110 0 0 Ealing PCT 0 0 0 East and North Hertfordshire PCT 334 0 0 East Lancashire PCT 162 0 0 East Riding of Yorkshire PCT 65 0 0 East Sussex Downs and Weald PCT 3,101 0 0 Eastern and Coastal Kent PCT 998 0 0 Enfield PCT 0 0 0 Gateshead PCT 0 1,621 0 Gloucestershire PCT 908 0 0 Great Yarmouth and Waveney PCT 2,527 0 0 Greenwich Teaching PCT 0 0 0 Halton and St. Helens PCT 476 0 0 Hammersmith and Fulham PCT 0 0 0 Hampshire PCT 227 2,493 4,069 Haringey Teaching PCT 0 150 20 Harrow PCT 0 0 0 Hartlepool PCT 0 150 0 Hastings and Rother PCT 2,259 0 0 Havering PCT 0 0 500 Heart of Birmingham Teaching PCT 0 197 0 Herefordshire PCT 0 348 0 Heywood, Middleton and Rochdale PCT 1,933 91 0 Hillingdon PCT 0 0 0 Hounslow PCT 0 0 0 Hull PCT 294 0 60 Isle of Wight NHS PCT 631 0 0 Islington PCT 0 0 0 Kensington and Chelsea PCT 0 20 0 Kingston PCT 0 0 0 Kirklees PCT 121 0 0 Knowsley PCT' 0 0 0 Lambeth PCT 0 0 0 Leeds PCT 1,328 2,561 0 Leicester City PCT 1,272 1,100 0 Leicestershire County and Rutland PCT 2,534 386 0 Lewisham PCT 0 130 0 Lincolnshire PCT 600 0 0 Liverpool PCT 431 0 0 Luton PCT 0 0 0 Manchester PCT 929 0 0 Medway PCT 0 188 0 Mid Essex PCT 3,264 1,077 90 Middlesbrough PCT 0 1,172 495 Milton Keynes PCT 0 0 279 Newcastle PCT 0 2,059 0 Newham PCT 0 0 0 Norfolk PCT 3,549 0 0 North East Essex PCT 935 0 0 North East Lincolnshire PCT 0 106 179 North Lancashire PCT 1,708 1,000 0 North Lincolnshire PCT 0 0 0 North Somerset PCT 0 0 0 North Staffordshire PCT 0 487 0 North Tees PCT 0 688 0 North Tyneside PCT 0 670 50 North Yorkshire and York PCT 2,300 3,916 0 Northamptonshire PCT 1,394 300 150 Northumberland Care PCT 0 2,202 0 Nottingham City PCT 0 0 0 Nottinghamshire County PCT 554 115 826 Oldham PCT 0 0 0 Oxfordshire PCT 494 620 1,519 Peterborough PCT 503 42 0 Plymouth Teaching PCT 0 0 0 Portsmouth City Teaching PCT 0 0 0 Redbridge PCT 0 0 0 Redcar and Cleveland PCT 766 986 0 Richmond and Twickenham PCT 0 0 0 Rotherham PCT 0 0 0 Salford PCT 0 0 0 Sandwell PCT 685 0 0 Sefton PCT 1,101 0 0 Sheffield PCT 891 2,476 0 Shropshire County PCT 0 0 0 Solihull NHS Care Trust PCT 172 720 0 Somerset PCT 1,085 0 0 South Birmingham PCT 0 0 0 South East Essex PCT 66 0 389 South Gloucestershire PCT 0 0 0 South Staffordshire PCT 61 500 0 South Tyneside PCT 0 2,296 0 South West Essex PCT 1,412 0 0 Southampton City PCT 0 0 0 Southwark PCT 0 0 0 Stockport PCT 0 0 0 Stoke on Trent PCT 222 703 0 Suffolk PCT 2,556 422 0 Sunderland Teaching PCT 0 2,020 0 Surrey PCT 4,592 1,390 0 Sutton And Merton PCT 0 0 0 Swindon PCT 0 0 0 Tameside and Glossop PCT 0 0 749 Telford and Wrekin PCT 0 0 0 Torbay Care PCT 0 0 0 Tower Hamlets PCT 0 155 0 Trafford PCT 0 0 0 Wakefield District PCT 694 238 0 Walsall Teaching PCT 0 0 0 Waltham Forest PCT 0 268 0 Wandsworth PCT 0 0 0 Warrington PCT 0 0 0 Warwickshire PCT 967 204 1,210 West Essex PCT 575 318 0 West Hertfordshire PCT 398 0 0 West Kent PCT 2,304 0 0 West Sussex PCT 4,633 308 0 Western Cheshire PCT 1,241 0 0 Westminster PCT 0 0 0 Wiltshire PCT 0 329 60 Wirral PCT 455 0 0 Wolverhampton City PCT 0 0 0 Worcestershire PCT 197 360 111 Total 74,521 45,393 12,528 Source: Primary care trust audited summarisation schedules for 2007-08.
NHS: Temporary Employment
Due to the way in which correspondence is logged, information on the specific number of representations received on the potential additional costs to the national health service of changes to the value added tax treatment of agency staff could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
The latest estimate of the potential cost to the NHS is £26 million per year, revised from an earlier estimate of £30 million when VAT stood at 17.5 per cent.
Nurses: Manpower
This information is not held centrally.
Pharmacy: Chelmsford
The NHS Information Centre does not hold data on the number of licensed pharmacies but we do hold the number of community pharmacies in contract with their primary care trust (PCT) at the 31 March each year.
The NHS Information Centre first published these data for 2004-05 so figures for four financial years only have been provided.
The information is held by PCT only. Prior to 2006 the PCT area which best fits West Chelmsford constituency was Chelmsford PCT. From 2006 the PCT which covers West Chelmsford constituency is Mid Essex PCT. Mid Essex PCT is larger than the old Chelmsford PCT which may account for the larger number of pharmacies listed.
Chelmsford PCT Mid Essex PCT 2004-05 21 — 2005-06 21 — 2006-07 — 54 2007-08 — 54 Note: Each community pharmacy has an arrangement with a PCT to dispense NHS prescriptions. The arrangement specifies both the premises and the named contractor. Community pharmacies can dispense the full range of drugs and appliances as listed in the monthly Drug Tariff published by the NHS Prescription Services (previously known as the Prescription Pricing Division or PPD) of the NHS Business Services Authority.
Social Services
Data on the outcome of social care assessments for people of working age (aged 18-64) are collected and published by the NHS Information Centre for health and social care. The table giving this information has been placed in the Library. Data on the level of social care need are not held centrally. It is for individual local authorities to decide on the eligibility criteria for receiving state-funded social care services.
Social Services: Finance
The Government are committed to driving forward increased personalisation of public services, including ensuring that people using social care services should have access to maximum independence, choice and control. Personal budgets, building on the success of direct payments and the experiences of the thirteen individual budget pilot sites, are central to this aim.
Councils will be supported to make substantial progress on transforming their systems to deliver personalised services over the next two years. The ring-fenced social care reform grant provides £520 million to help councils redesign and reshape their systems over the next three years in order to deliver this transformation. Performance across health and social care will be measured against relevant indicators in the national indicator set and any relevant local area agreement (LAA) improvement targets. This information will inform the Care Quality Commission’s assessments of primary care trusts and councils across health and adult social care which, in turn, contribute to the comprehensive area assessment.
In addition to the existing performance mechanisms, the Department and its partners are working to improve the adult social care indicators for future spending cycles. This work builds on the lessons learnt from the current national indicator set and the first round of the LAAs. The revised indicators are likely to form part of the evidence base for both future assessments by the inspectorates and the foundation for the next round of LAAs. The Department is now taking initial development work forward in partnership with Association of Directors of Adult Social Services regional networks, joint investment plans and other local sector stakeholders and as part of a wider Government review of the indicator set for the next comprehensive spending review period.
Strokes
This information is not collected centrally. However, the National Sentinel Stroke Audit, prepared by the Royal College of Physicians and which is based on clinical data collected directly from national health service trusts, details the latest evidence on the provision of stroke services including thrombolysis and CT scanning. The most recent audit is available at the college’s internet website at:
www.rcplondon.ac.uk/clinical-standards/ceeu/Current-work/Documents/Public%20organisational%20report2008.pdf
Energy and Climate Change
Air Pollution: Scotland
I have been asked to reply.
There are, as yet, no firm plans to amend the Clean Air Act 1993 in response to changes in fuel use patterns in Scotland.
The Clean Air Act 1993 is an important part of the regulatory system which is helping to improve air quality and protect public health. Its provisions cover the whole of the UK and any changes to it need to be considered on that basis. Such consideration will need to take into account the different ways in which the UK's Devolved Administrations will seek to deliver the increases in renewable heat and energy needed to achieve the UK's obligations.
British Plastics Federation
My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State replied to the letter from the British Plastics Federation on 27 February 2009.
Carbon Challenge Programme
[holding answer 4 March 2009]: I have been asked to reply.
The Carbon Challenge was launched in February 2007. This initiative has been developed by the Homes and Communities Agency on behalf of the Department. It is aimed at helping the house-building industry accelerate its response to climate change through innovation and the development of skills. Homes delivered through the Carbon Challenge will be designed to meet the highest level of the Code for Sustainable Homes and will emit net zero carbon in the course of a year.
The Homes and Communities Agency has allocated £750,000 to the initiative over a three year period from 2007-08 until 2009-10. To date overall expenditure has amounted to £341,017 on the first phase of four sites which are owned by the public sector. This covers matters such as the development of the generic brief for the sites, the provision of advice to partners as well as monitoring and evaluation.
Carbon Emissions
Although no specific assessment has been made of the implications of the Citiworks ruling for carbon dioxide emissions reductions, DECC will be consulting on the full implications of the Citiworks ruling and any necessary legislative changes later this year.
Christmas
DECC has spent nothing on Christmas cards, decorations or parties. DECC’s Christmas greetings were sent to recipients as e-cards, via e-mail. These e-cards were designed in-house using images submitted by staff, at no additional cost.
Climate Change
The UK is already acting on the Eliasch Review recommendations in most areas and is taking forward the analysis in relevant parts of the climate change negotiations for a future arrangement through the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The Government do not intend to make a formal response to the review.
Electricity Generation
A second phase of the ENSG 2020 Electricity Transmission Network study, available at
http://www.ensg.gov.uk/assets/1696-01-ensg_vision2020.pdf
will now consider generation scenarios for 2025 and 2030. A report of this further work is expected to be published in the spring.
Energy Saving Trust
The Energy Saving Trust is a private company limited by guarantee, and details of their contractors and complaints procedures are therefore a matter for the trust's board.
The Department grant funds the Energy Saving Trust year-on-year, supporting the valuable work in the domestic carbon abatement field. We do not fund the Energy Saving Trust for business consumer inquiries. The Department and its predecessors grant funded the trust annually as follows1:
Funding (£ million) 1996-97 25 1997-98 19 1998-99 19 1999-2000 23 2000-01 22 2001-02 22 2002-03 24 2003-04 25 2004-05 28 2005-06 27 2006-07 27 2007-08 29 2008-09 35
Analysis in the Climate Change Programme (March 2006) showed that the trust's activity is very cost-effective in terms of £/tCO2. In 2007-08 the overall cost-effectiveness of the trust's work improved to £1.20 per tonne of lifetime carbon dioxide saved. The trust's influenced lifetime CO2 savings have improved in 2007-08 to 21.5mt CO2 compared to 16mt CO2 in 2006-07. The EST's activities make an effective and respected contribution to our climate change ambitions.
1 We do not have figures for Departmental funding from 1992-1996.
Fossil Fuels: North Sea
The impact of phase III of the EU emission trading system (EU ETS) on the UK upstream oil and gas industry was discussed at the PILOT meeting on 10 February 2009 which was chaired by the Secretary of State of Energy and Climate Change. The meeting was attended by representatives of the oil and gas industry, including Oil and Gas UK. Officials from the Department of Energy and Climate Change are continuing to work with Oil and Gas UK and individual companies to analyse the impacts of phase III of the EU ETS on the sector.
Fuel Poverty
Since 2000 over £20 billion has been spent on fuel poverty benefits and programmes.
This includes the Warm Front Scheme in England, carbon emissions reduction target and the Decent Homes Programme primarily addressing the energy efficiency of households, winter fuel and cold weather payments to increase household incomes.
The combination of national and local programmes and delivery through local government, partnerships and area-based schemes can help target areas of particular need. We are currently consulting on the Community Energy Savings Programme (CESP), where we propose to support energy efficiency measures at a local, community level, by fostering new and existing partnerships between energy companies, local authorities, voluntary organisations and other such bodies, to offer support to poorer communities on a house-by-house, street-by-street basis.
As part of the Local Government Framework, National Indicator 187 (Tackling Fuel Poverty) has been designed to measure the proportion of households on income-related benefits for whom an energy assessment of their housing has been carried out and have a SAP of below 35 or greater than 65. We are encouraged that 40 out of 150 local area agreements (LAAs) have included NI187 as one of their 35 local improvement targets and have set challenging but achievable targets. All local authorities will have to report on progress each year.
Responsibility for fuel poverty policy is a devolved matter. Ministers across Government and the devolved nations discuss policy to tackle fuel poverty and we publish an annual report which includes information on progress in the devolved Administrations.
Kingsnorth Power Station
A decision on the application by E.ON UK plc for consent under section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989 for a 1600MW coal fired power station at Kingsnorth will follow the conclusion of both the consultation on carbon capture readiness and the planned new consultation on a new framework for coal fired power stations.
Natural Gas
Companies are bringing forward new gas supply infrastructure to meet the gradual decline in the UK’s stocks of indigenous gas. Our import capacity has increased by 400 per cent. in the last 10 years, and is now equivalent to some 120 per cent. of our annual gas consumption. In addition, 18 commercial gas storage projects are in different stages of development; if they were all to come forward they could give us storage capacity equivalent to some 20 per cent. of our current gas consumption by around 2020.
Wind Power: Planning Permission
The Government have a comprehensive framework of national planning policy and guidance on renewable energy. This is in addition to the body of guidance for local planning authorities on handling planning applications and engagement with local communities affected by planning applications. Communities and Local Government’s Planning Policy Statement on Climate Change (PPS1) and Renewable Energy (PPS22) set out the considerations that will be relevant to planning applications for wind farms. There is also detailed guidance for practitioners in the companion guides supporting both PPSs.
The Department also makes available guidance on community involvement in wind energy development which can be downloaded at
http://www.berr.gov.uk/energy/sources/renewables/policy/renewables-advisory-board/community-involvment-wind/guidance-local-authority-officers/page35088.html.
In addition, the guidance on applications for large-scale energy developments (over 50MW) under Section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989 makes clear the need to ensure that local communities are consulted at an early stage. This can be downloaded at
http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file42017.pdf.
Work and Pensions
Carers' Benefits
In our Carers Strategy, published in June 2008, we set out our vision of the support we aim to provide for carers over the next 10 years. In developing our Carers Strategy, we conducted one of the most in-depth and widespread consultations ever held on carers’ issues. This included discussions with carers’ interest groups on a wide range of benefit issues.
People who have retired from work but continue to care for relatives are not excluded from claiming carer’s allowance. Although carer’s allowance will not usually be payable where state pension is in payment, the person can still access the carer premium, currently £27.75 a week, in the income-related benefits such as housing benefit and council tax benefit, or the equivalent additional amount for carers in pension credit. In addition, where someone would receive less from state pension than from carer’s allowance, an amount of carer’s allowance can be paid to make up the difference.
Children: Maintenance
The administration of the child maintenance system is a matter for the Commissioner of the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission. He will write to the hon. Member with the information requested.
Letter from Stephen Geraghty:
In reply to your recent Parliamentary Question, the Secretary of State promised a substantive reply from the Child Maintenance Commissioner as the Child Support Agency is now the responsibility of the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission.
You asked the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many claimants in (a) Great Britain (b) each region and (c) each London borough did not receive the full child support payment in each of the last 12 months. [242177]
It should be noted that the Child Maintenance and Other Payments Act 2008 made changes to the way child maintenance is paid to parents with care in receipt of income based benefits. Prior to 27 October 2008, the Child Support Agency, on behalf of the Secretary of State, was required to retain a proportion of child maintenance received in respect of parents with care in receipt of income based benefits. From 27 October 2008, the Agency forwards all maintenance received and parents with care in receipt of benefits will need to inform Jobcentre Plus about any maintenance they have received.
The information you have requested in respect of the number of cases where the non-resident parent paid all, part or none of the child maintenance due in the previous quarter is included in the tables which have been placed in the Library.
Some non-resident parents will go to great lengths to avoid fulfilling their responsibilities to their children. The Child Support Agency has made improvements to how it is collecting and enforcing maintenance and is now consistently collecting and arranging record amounts of child maintenance, with over £1.1 billion collected or arranged in the year to the end of December 2008.
I hope you find this answer helpful.
Number Percentage None Full Over 1-20 Over 20-40 Over 40- 60 Over 60-80 Over 80 to under 100 Agency 276,800 402,500 15,700 20,700 23,300 37,000 48,500 Government Office Region East Midlands 20,500 29,700 1,000 1,500 1,700 2,800 3,400 Eastern 22,900 33,900 1,100 1,800 1,800 2,900 3,500 London 27,600 31,100 1,400 1,900 2,200 3,200 4,100 North East 17,500 23,700 1,300 1,400 1,700 2,500 3,400 North West 34,500 53,400 2,200 2,700 3,300 5,800 7,500 Scotland 25,500 35,200 1,700 2,100 2,200 3,300 4,700 South East 34,000 54,500 1,700 2,300 2,400 3,900 5,200 South West 23,100 40,400 1,200 1,600 1,800 3,100 3,800 Wales 15,000 24,400 900 1,200 1,400 2,400 3,400 West Midlands 26,000 38,400 1,700 2,200 2,500 3,600 4,600 Yorkshire/Humber 29,100 37,200 1,500 2,100 2,300 3,500 4,600 London local authority Barking and Dagenham 1,160 1,220 40 60 70 120 160 Barnet 1,000 910 50 50 50 70 120 Bexley 1,070 1,460 40 50 80 110 140 Brent 750 820 30 40 70 90 130 Bromley 920 1260 40 50 80 80 120 Camden 570 590 30 30 30 50 90 City of London 10 10 — — — — — Croydon 1,770 1,910 110 130 130 200 260 Ealing 970 1,170 50 80 110 180 130 Enfield 1,320 1,260 70 80 100 180 200 Greenwich 1,210 1,220 70 90 100 200 210 Hackney 690 750 50 50 50 110 110 Hammersmith and Fulham 490 440 30 30 50 90 140 Haringey 890 790 50 70 70 70 120 Harrow 510 720 20 50 40 110 40 Havering 750 1,350 30 60 90 50 140 Hillingdon 940 1,140 50 80 70 70 150 Hounslow 840 1,200 40 50 80 110 150 Islington 850 790 30 50 60 90 110 Kensington and Chelsea 320 390 10 20 20 20 60 Kingston upon Thames 320 540 20 30 20 60 50 Lambeth 1,330 1,100 100 90 110 140 200 Lewisham 1,490 1,350 80 140 130 170 150 Merton 660 790 40 70 50 70 100 Newham 950 990 50 70 80 90 140 Redbridge 810 970 40 40 50 90 130 Richmond upon Thames 330 600 30 10 10 20 50 Southwark 1,400 1,350 80 100 110 170 180 Sutton 610 1,030 50 30 50 120 80 Tower Hamlets 700 710 40 50 70 60 90 Waltham Forest 860 1,010 40 60 60 90 210 Wandsworth 740 780 40 80 70 100 110 Westminster 390 500 30 30 40 40 70
The Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission is responsible for the child maintenance system. I have therefore asked the Child Maintenance Commissioner to write to the hon. Member with the information requested.
Letter from Stephen Geraghty:
In reply to your recent Parliamentary Question about the Child Support Agency, the Secretary of State promised a substantive reply from the Child Maintenance Commissioner as the Child Support Agency is now the responsibility of the Child Maintenance and Enforcement Commission.
You asked the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many new applications have been made to the Child Support Agency by (a) parents with care claiming income support and (b) other parents with care in each of the last 24 months.
Information on the number of applications received each month is routinely published in Table 2.1 of the Child Support Agency Quarterly Summary of Statistics (QSS). The latest copy of which is in the House of Commons library or online at the following link:
http://www.childmaintenance.org/publications/statistics.html
The Child Maintenance and other Payments Act 2008 changed the nature of the relationship between the child maintenance and benefits systems; ending the compulsion on parents with care in receipt of income based benefits to use the Child Support Agency. Prior to 14 July 2008 all parents with care making a new application for either Income Support or income based Jobseekers Allowance were compelled to make an application for child maintenance to the Child Support Agency. The Agency therefore recorded information on new applications distinguishing between those notified by Jobcentre Plus in respect of parents claiming Income Support and Jobseekers Allowance or those which were classed as a ‘private’ application made by either parent without compulsion.
Such information as is available on child maintenance applications by source is provided in the attached table.
Current scheme applications by source of applicationJobcentre Plus applicationsPrivate applicationsJanuary 200719,0005,600February 200727,7005,900March 200721,4005,900April 200716,5005,900 May 200718,8006,000June 200719,6006,400July 200718,6006,100August 200720,3006,400September 200718,6006,400October 200720,3007,100November 200720,9006,100December 200714,1004,000January 200821,3006,900February 200820,5006,500March 200815,7006,000April 200817,8006,700May 200816,2006,300June 200817,4006,700July 200818,5006,700August 200810,6005,900September 20085,1006,800October 20089007,000November 2008—7,300December 2008—5,300 Notes:1. A change in legislation in October 2008 removed the compulsion for parents with care on income based benefit (Income Support or Jobseeker’s Allowance (Income Based)) to pursue a claim for child support through the Agency. After this date, it is expected that some parents with care will opt to end their child support claim with CSA. This can be seen as a fall in overall caseload after October 2008.2. In the run up to the change, a further legislative repeal in July 2008 means that single parents making a new claim for income based benefit will no longer be referred to CSA. Some will make direct arrangements with the Agency, but they are not compelled to do so. This change can be seen as a huge fall (to zero) in the numbers of potential new claims received directly from Jobcentre Plus from October 2008.3. All cases received from October 2008 were classed as private intake. Any cases that were received from this time will be classed as private intake regardless of benefit status.4. Jobcentre Plus applications include all applications originating from Jobcentre Plus where the parent with care is in receipt of Income Support or income based Jobseekers’ Allowance at the time of application. It is not possible to identify those on Income Support separately.
Cold Weather Payments: Leyton
Estimates of cold weather payment expenditure in 2008-09 to date are not available by parliamentary constituency or local authority, but only by weather station.
Community Care Grants
(2) what the maximum sum awarded to (a) an individual and (b) a family was under the community care grant in 2007-08;
(3) how many individuals received community care grants (a) once and (b) more than once in 2007-08;
(4) how many asylum seekers have received community care grants in each of the last five years.
The Department allocated a budget of £141 million for community care grants for Great Britain in 2007-08. There was also a contingency reserve of £1 million, which was available to cover unforeseen spending, for example, on flooding.
The remaining information requested is not available.
However, the maximum community care grant awarded in 2007-08 for all successful applicants (as opposed to individuals and families separately) was £5,081.46. The number of successful applicants (as opposed to individuals) who received community care grants in 2007-08 (a) once was 229,100 and (b) more than once was 23,900 (both figures rounded to the nearest 100).
Source:
Analysis of a scan of Community Care Grant final decisions taken in 2007-08 and held on the Social Fund Computer System on 31 July 2008. A final decision is either an initial decision or a review decision. An application is successful if an award is made initially and/or on review. Successful applications on which initial decisions were made before 2007-08, but which were reviewed in 2007-08 are included. Successful applications on which initial decisions were made in 2007-08 but which were reviewed after the year ended are not included.
Council Tax Benefits
The latest available information has been placed in the Library.
Information is not available broken down by month.
[holding answer 6 March 2009]: Estimates of the population entitled to council tax benefit among children in households below average income are not available.
The latest estimates of take-up of and entitlement to means-tested benefits in Great Britain, covering income support, pension credit, housing benefit, council tax benefit and jobseeker’s allowance (income based) are published in the report “Income Related Benefits Estimates of Take-Up in 2006-07”. This report has been placed in the Library.
[holding answer 6 March 2009]: The information requested is in the table.
Number Number of benefit units in receipt of council tax benefit 5,079,080 Number of benefit units in receipt of council tax benefit where claimant aged 60 and over 2,528,950 Number of benefit units in receipt of council tax benefit where claimant aged 59 and under 2,550,140 Notes: 1. The data refer to benefit units, which may be a single person or a couple. 2. The figures have been rounded to the nearest ten. 3. Figures for any non-responding authorities have been estimated. 4. Council tax benefit totals exclude any second adult rebate cases. 5. Totals may not sum due to rounding. 6. From February 2007, DWP has been collecting more detailed HB/CTB data electronically from local authorities. Over time this will improve the accuracy, timeliness and level of detail available in the published statistics. However, until the new data have been fully quality assured to National Statistics standards, the most recent summary statistics available are for August 2007. 7. Administrative HB/CTB Information contains two age breakdowns on the basis of the age of individual who makes the claim (i) those under the age of 60 and (ii) those aged 60 and over. Therefore ‘Pensioners’ refers to recipient benefit units where the person who claimed is aged 60 or over: the partner may be under 60. Source: Housing benefit and council tax benefit management information system quarterly 100 per cent. caseload stock-count taken in August 2007.
Analysis of the Family Resources survey for 2006-07 suggests that 61 per cent. of pensioners entitled to council tax benefit are not liable to pay income tax.
For people of working age 81 per cent. of families entitled to council tax benefit are not liable to pay income tax.
These estimates refer to Great Britain and are based on survey data and modelling so are subject to sample variation and to other forms of errors.
[holding answer 6 March 2009]: The table gives the available information on council tax benefit recipients and eligible population by household income bands, for 2006-07 in Great Britain.
Banded weekly household income (i) Recipients of council tax benefit (ii) Entitled population to council tax benefit (a) Pensioners Less than £100 a week 2 4 £100 but less than £200 36 38 £200 but less than £300 40 36 £300 but less than £400 16 15 £400 but less than £500 4 4 More than £500 2 4 Total 100 100 (b) Non Pensioners Less than £100 a week 4 7 £100 but less than £200 33 26 £200 but less than £300 34 29 £300 but less than £400 16 17 £400 but less than £500 7 10 More than £500 6 10 Total 100 100 Notes: 1. The data refer to household incomes. Note that a household income can be higher than the income of the family receiving council tax benefit, as a household can contain two or more families. 2. The figures are presented as proportions because point estimates of the entitled population are potentially misleading given the presence of sample bias. 3. Council tax benefit totals include second adult rebate cases. 4. Pensioner families are defined as where at least one person aged 60 or more. Source: Family Resources Survey Data 2006-07.
[holding answer 9 March 2009]: The information is in the table.
£ Single people aged under 25 50.95 Lone parent aged under 18 0 Single people aged 25-59 (or any age entitled to main phase ESA) 64.30 Lone parents aged 18-59 64.30 Single person/lone parent aged 60-64 130.00 Single person/lone parent aged 65 or over 150.40 Couples, both partners aged under 18 0 Couples where older partner is aged 18-59 100.95 Couples where one or both are aged 60 or over, but both are aged under 65 198.45 Couples where one or both are aged 65 or over 225.50 Notes: 1. Nil rate quoted as a person must be aged 18 or over in order to be liable for council tax. 2. Rates quoted above do not include any additional allowances which might be applicable, for example in respect of children. Source: Following the uprating statement to Parliament made by right hon. Tony McNulty MP on 11 December 2008, DWP issued a press release giving details of the benefit uprating: www.dwp.gov.uk/mediacentre/pressreleases/2008/dec/NewBenefitRates.pdf Local authorities were informed of the new rates in HB/CTB Circular A27/2008, a copy of which is at: www.dwp.gov.uk/housingbenefit/user-communications/circulars/2008/a27-2008.pdf
[holding answer 9 March 2009]: The level of income at which income extinguishes entitlement to council tax benefit (CTB) will depend upon the liability for council tax as well as the individuals’ personal circumstances. For this reason, it is not possible to provide income figures in the way envisaged in the question.
People receiving the guarantee credit element of pension credit, income support, income-based jobseeker’s allowance or income-related employment support allowance are deemed to have no income or capital and they receive maximum CTB (subject to any standard deductions for any non-dependant household member).
People not receiving the income-related benefits listed above will have their CTB assessed on the basis of an “applicable amount”. The amount is made up of personal allowances and premiums. The personal allowances vary according to age and whether a person is single or one of a married or unmarried couple. The premiums are awarded to those groups identified as having extra needs, for example, long term sick or disabled people and elderly people.
If net income is equal to or is less than the applicable amount, the customer will receive an amount equal to 100 per cent. of their council tax liability less any non-dependant deductions. If net income is more than the applicable amount, the customer will get less CTB. For each pound of extra income over the applicable amount, an adjustment of 20 pence will be made (this is the CTB taper).
In addition, anyone with savings, investments and other capital valued at more than £16,000 will not normally qualify for CTB. Capital of £6,000 or less is ignored. Capital of between £6,000 and £16,000 will be deemed to provide a weekly income of £1 for every £250 (or part thereof) if the person is aged less than 60, or £1 for every £500 (or part thereof) if they are 60 or over.
The following tables set out the applicable amounts, and hence the level at which customers begin to start paying some council tax for the client groups listed in the question.
Pensioners Starts to pay some council tax when net income exceeds (£) Single person aged 60-64 124.05 Single person aged 65 or over 143.80 Couple, one or both aged 60 or over, but both aged under 65 189.35 Couple, one or both aged 65 or over 215.50
Working age Starts to pay some council tax when net income exceeds (£) Single person aged under 25 47.95 Single person aged over 25 60.50 Couple 94.95 Single parent with one dependent child aged under one 140.34 Single parent with one dependent child aged one or over 129.84 Couple with one dependent child aged under one 174.79 Couple with one dependent child aged one or over 164.29 Notes: 1. All examples assume no disabilities/no childcare costs/no non-dependants. 2. Rates are for current year (2008-09).
Departmental Aviation
The information requested could be provided only at disproportionate costs. Travel by Ministers and civil servants are undertaken in accordance with the Ministerial Code and the Civil Service Management Code respectively.
Departmental Surveys
The costs for DWP surveys in the last five years are as follows:
£ 2004-05 1110,000 2005-06 199,595 2006-07 247,041 2007-08 1114,535 2008-09 1115,245 1 Full census. 2 20 per cent. sample.
The survey supplier for all these surveys was ORC International.
Departmental Training
The Department does provide training on voice coaching to our contact centre staff, which includes a one-hour module on voice training and acoustic shock (the shock caused by sudden/loud noises on the telephone) and training on techniques in speaking clearly, explaining well and the importance of voice care. In addition to this, line managers provide coaching on the use of language and vocal tone as part of their normal call monitoring processes.
Incapacity Benefit: North East
The available information is in the following table.
Claimants over 60 Blyth Valley 700 North East 23,340 North West 53,610 Notes: 1. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10. 2. Data available on: www.nomisweb.co.uk Source: The Department for Work and Pensions Information Directorate 100 per cent. Work and Pensions Longitudinal Study
Jobcentre Plus
(2) at what Civil Service payband local drug jobcentre co-ordinators will be employed; and if he will place in the Library a copy of the job specification for this role.
[holding answer 5 March 2009]: The administration of Jobcentre Plus is a matter for the acting chief executive of Jobcentre Plus, Mel Groves. I have asked him to provide my hon. Friend with the information requested.
Letter from Mel Groves:
The Secretary of State has asked me to reply to your questions about Jobcentre Plus Drug Co-ordinators including how many will be employed; what percentage of Jobcentre Plus offices they will cover; which grade they will be; and whether a job specification can be made available. This is something that falls within the responsibilities delegated to me as acting chief executive of Jobcentre Plus.
The introduction of Drug Co-ordinators is a joint initiative between Jobcentre Plus, the Department of Health (DH) and the National Treatment Agency (NTA) which has been put in place to support the National Drugs Strategy “Drugs-Protecting Families and Communities”. As part of this, the DH has put £9 million into funding the posts from 2009-2011.
As responsibility for health is a devolved matter in Scotland and Wales, the DH can only fund Drug Co-ordinators in England, however, we will continue to work with officials in Scotland and Wales to try to ensure customers in these countries will have similar provision in the future.
We are currently recruiting to fill 63 Drug Co-ordinator posts at Band D (HEO) level. We will have at least one Drug Co-ordinator in place within each of our districts in England and they will be further supported by one of nine Strategic Lead posts (filled at Band F/Grade 7) which will be based within their region.
The decision to put in place district-based Drug Co-ordinators was based on research carried out by Glasgow University in 2006. The research provided information about the number of known problem drug users in specific geographical areas.
We already have eight Drug Co-ordinators in post, and expect that a further 52 will be in place by the end of March, with the remaining three posts being filled during April. We expect that well before October, all of the posts will have been filled and we will have a dedicated Drug Co-ordinator in post within every Jobcentre Plus district in England.
Whilst the Drug Co-ordinator posts are based at district level, part of their job is to ensure that customer-facing advisers within their district are aware of the help and support that we will be able to offer customers.
This means that a customer attending any Jobcentre Plus office in England who declares they are a problem drug user, will be offered a referral to a discussion with a treatment provider.
I have attached a Drug Co-ordinator Job Description at Annex 1, and a copy of this will be placed in the Library.
Jobcentre Plus: Telephone Services
The administration of Jobcentre Plus is a matter for the acting chief executive of Jobcentre Plus, Mel Groves. I have asked him to provide the hon. Member with the information requested.
Letter from Mel Groves:
The Secretary of State has asked me to reply to your question asking how many staff and full-time equivalent staff are employed to answer calls to Jobcentre Plus helplines. This is something that falls within the responsibilities delegated to me as Acting Chief Executive of Jobcentre Plus.
As at 30 November 2008 the number of staff employed to answer calls in Contact Centre Directorate was 5,756, and the Full Time Equivalent was 5,210.
Mortgages: Government Assistance
We are currently revising our projections for jobseeker’s allowance, and within this the number of claimant unemployed who are receiving support for mortgage interest, and updated projections will be published following the Budget.
In November 2008, 5,000 jobseeker’s allowance claimants received support for mortgage interest, but we would expect this figure to rise in response to increasing unemployment and recent policy changes making support for mortgage interest available from three months into the claim.
At this time we do not have data to provide actual figures on the number of people who are being helped under the new support for mortgage interest rules.
It should be noted that since these changes were brought in on the 5 January, the impact on new claims would not show up until the end of the 13 week waiting period in early April 2009; although the extension of the reforms to cover those who have already served a waiting period over 13 weeks, and the six-month freeze of the standard interest rate, will mean that customers have started benefiting already.
We are currently revising our caseload and expenditure projections for jobseeker’s allowance, and within this the number of claimant unemployed who are receiving support for mortgage interest. Updated projections will be published following the Budget.
In November 2008, 5,000 jobseeker’s allowance claimants received support for mortgage interest, but we would expect this figure to rise in response to increasing unemployment and recent policy changes making support for mortgage interest available from three months into the claim.
Nuclear Power Stations
(2) if he will estimate the additional (a) staff and (b) resources required to enable the Health and Safety Executive and the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate to complete the generic design assessment work on the three nuclear reactor designs for future construction in the UK in half the time presently scheduled.
I have been asked to reply.
The factors affecting the length of time that generic design assessment will take are given at paragraph 24 of the joint guidance “New Nuclear Power Stations, Generic Design Assessment—A guide to the regulatory process”— published by HSE and the Environment Agency in August 2008. These include:
The content, quality and timeliness of the submissions;
The completeness of the design;
The introduction of design changes;
The significance of assessment issues arising;
The responsiveness of requesting parties to issues and questions;
The availability of resources to the regulators;
The ability to make best use of information from overseas nuclear regulators;
The number of designs being assessed in parallel; and
The experience of the regulators with similar reactor designs.
Given that resource is only one of these factors, the HSE does not believe that it is feasible for its Nuclear Installations Inspectorate (NII) to complete GDA in half the time presently scheduled, irrespective of the numbers of staff or resources available.
I have been asked to reply.
The nuclear regulators have completed GDA Steps 1 and 2 for four reactor designs (AECL's ACR1000, Areva's European Pressurised Water Reactor (EPR), GE-Hitachi's ESBWR and Toshiba-Westinghouse's API000) and a series of reports were published on the Health and Safety Executive's website in March 2008.
ACR-1000 and ESBWR have been, respectively, withdrawn and suspended from the GDA process at the request of the vendors.
HSE's Nuclear Installations Inspectorate (NII) is currently part-way through step 3 of a four step assessment process. NII aims to publish its step 3 findings in November 2009 and its step 4 findings in June 2011.
The Environment Agency (EA) is also part way through its detailed assessment process. EA aim to publicly consult on their initial findings in 2010 and publish their final reports by June 2011.
Pension Protection Fund
The funding of the Pension Protection Fund is a matter for the Board of the Pension Protection Fund, an independent statutory corporation. The PPF is funded through a pension protection levy that is charged to all eligible defined-benefit occupational pension schemes, assets from schemes that transfer in to the PPF and investment returns. The Board made a commitment in August 2007 to collect £675 million a year for the next three years, indexed to earnings, so long as there was no significant change in risk. The Board intends to collect £700 million in 2009-10, keeping to that commitment. A consultation on the future development of the pension protection levy for 2011-12 and beyond concluded on 13 February 2009 and the Board is currently considering the responses received.
[holding answer 5 March 2009]: Our assessment is that the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) cap and its provisions relating to early retirement are consistent with ECHR. It ensures consistent treatment, based on age, relative to the qualifying insolvency event, (the trigger for entry to the PPF). It also ensures that people who take early retirement before the insolvency event are not placed in a more beneficial position than people who stay in employment.
Pensioners
There is a statutory requirement to review all social security benefits each year and to consider whether they have retained their value in relation to the general level of prices. (The standard minimum guarantee in pension credit must be reviewed against the general level of earnings). A further requirement calls for certain benefits, including the state pension, to be up-rated at least in line with the increase in prices from April of the following year.
Following the most recent review, that took place in the autumn of last year, the rate of full basic state pension that will apply from this April will be £95.25. This amounts to an increase in the current rate of £4.55, which is in line with inflation as measured last September, when the Retail Prices Index was 5 per cent. This increase, against a backdrop of falling inflation, is in line with the highest increase in inflation last year and the biggest increase in the state pension since 2001. The increase in the standard minimum guarantee in pension credit to £130 for single pensioners (£198.45 for pensioner couples) from April more than keeps pace with earnings and represents the highest up-lift since it was introduced in 2003.
Furthermore, in order to provide direct financial support through the economic downturn pensioners have also received additional winter fuel payments this year that have increased the payments to £250 for eligible households with someone aged 60 to 79 and £400 for eligible households with someone aged over 80. In addition, for this year the Department has increased the Christmas bonus from £10 to £70 and increased the cold weather payment from £8.50 to £25.
Pensions: Forecasts
The information is not available to enable the separation of the number of requests for Individual Pension Forecasts from the total number of inquiries received via the Pension Forecasting IT service. Therefore the information given relates to the total number of forecasts issued.
The number of customers who have been issued with an Individual Pension Forecast via the Pensions Forecasting IT system in the last 12 months is in the following table.
No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % No. % 2008 February 23,484 86.08 1,396 5.12 660 2.42 306 1.12 1,437 5.27 27,283 100 March 21,109 87.10 627 2.59 768 3.17 226 0.93 1,505 6.21 24,235 100 April 21,838 87.17 514 2.05 778 3.11 278 1.11 1,643 6.56 25,051 100 May 15,931 88.03 183 1.01 681 3.76 128 0.71 1,174 6.49 18,097 100 June 15,868 88.45 143 0.80 259 1.44 474 2.64 1,197 6.67 17,941 100 July 17,656 86.83 399 1.96 561 2.76 519 2.55 1,199 5.90 20,334 100 August 20,599 88.17 690 2.95 755 3.23 525 2.25 793 3.39 23,362 100 September 44,458 94.36 1,401 2.97 706 1.50 378 0.80 173 0.37 47,116 100 October 51,550 93.61 1,507 2.74 1,256 2.28 568 1.03 186 0.34 55,067 100 November 54,177 94.65 1,551 2.71 921 1.61 486 0.85 105 0.18 57,240 100 December 41,330 96.53 666 1.56 529 1.24 261 0.61 31 0.07 42,817 100 2009 January 65,057 97.05 981 1.46 858 1.28 70 0.10 n/a n/a 66,966 100
The number of customers who received an Individual Pension Forecast from the e-service Real Time Pension Forecasting system is in the following table. All forecasts are produced in real time.
Month Number of forecasts issued 2008 February 5,318 March 5,883 April 6,350 May 4,395 June 2,957 July 26,353 August 25,453 September 27,759 October 31,061 November 35,490 December 23,731 2009 January 35,264 Total 230,014
PDCS also provided state pension information to pension providers to enable 1,093,986 Combined Pension forecasts to be produced in the period September 2008 to January 2009.
The Department offers three channels for pensions forecasts: e-service, telephone, and post.
The real-time e-service resumed on 30 June 2008. This system does not provide information on the age of the customers who have requested a forecast, and therefore the Department is unable to tell how many of the users of the service reach pension age on or after 6 April 2010.
For customers who reach state pension age on or after 6 April 2010, the Pension Forecast service resumed on 26 August 2008 for requests made by telephone or post to the Pension Forecasting IT service. 202,761 customers received a state pension forecast between 26 August 2008 and close of business on 24 February 2009.
Repossession Orders
Support for mortgage interest is available to those homeowners who qualify for one of the income-related benefits, income support, income-based jobseeker’s allowance, income-related employment and support allowance or pension credit. It is an integral component of those benefits. Couples are treated as a single unit in these benefits and if one member of a couple is in remunerative work of 24-hours or more, or has income which exceeds their entitlement, then they cannot receive the benefit. Only those couples who are not in remunerative work and who meet the other qualifying conditions of the benefit can receive support for mortgage interest. This is intended to ensure that resources are directed to where they are most needed and there are no plans to change this policy.
Support for mortgage interest is not the only form of help for homeowners in difficulty paying their mortgages. For example, the Government's Mortgage Rescue scheme provides £200 million to support up to 6,000 of the most vulnerable homeowners facing repossession to remain in their home. The Homeowner Mortgage Support scheme, which we expect to be open for business with the first lenders in April, will help ensure hard working people, including couples, who suffer a temporary loss of income can stay in their home. Both schemes are being led by Communities and Local Government.
Social Fund
[holding answer 5 March 2009]: There is no separate budget for crisis loans, but rather a combined loans budget for both crisis loans and budgeting loans. The following table gives the final gross loans budget and crisis loan gross expenditure for each of the last 12 years.
£ million Final gross loans budget Crisis loan gross expenditure 1997-98 397.5 54.3 1998-99 404.9 58.9 1999-2000 457.9 61.5 2000-01 524.6 65.3 2001-02 547.7 74.9 2002-03 548.9 84.6 2003-04 578.0 85.1 2004-05 585.0 81.9 2005-06 609.0 86.4 2006-07 700.0 97.9 2007-08 642.0 121.2 2008-09 624.0 1132.6 1 To 31 January. Source: Annual reports by the Secretary of State for Social Security/Work and Pensions on the Social Fund (with greater accuracy for Crisis Loan expenditure than in the annual reports for the first three years obtained from the DWP Social Fund Policy, Budget and Management Information System).
[holding answer 5 March 2009]: The available information is given in the table.
Percentage of applications resulting in an initial award 1997-98 75.9 1998-99 76.2 1999-2000 72.5 2000-01 72.0 2001-02 74.6 2002-03 76.3 2003-04 75.9 2004-05 75.1 2005-06 74.5 2006-07 74.4 2007-08 68.5 April 2008 to January 2009 67.8 Notes: 1. Figures do not include awards made after review. 2. Percentages are based on applications processed in each year, not on applications received in each year. Source: Annual reports by the Secretary of State for Social Security/Work and Pensions on the Social Fund (with greater accuracy than in the annual reports for the first three years obtained from the DWP Social Fund Policy, Budget and Management Information System or departmental records).
Social Fund: Bexley
The information requested is not available. Social Fund data are not held by London borough, but by Jobcentre Plus Social Fund budget area (or, before such budget areas were used for the administration of the Social Fund, by Jobcentre Plus district, and, prior to that, by Social Fund district). Since May 2002, there have been several changes to the boundaries of administrative areas. As a result, data which can be compared across time are available for all Jobcentre Plus Social Fund budget areas from September 2006 only.
Social Security Benefits: Lone Parents
(2) how many and what proportion of lone parents under benefits sanctions for failing to attend a work-focused interview have been visited by a compliance officer in each month since such interviews became compulsory; and if he will make a statement
(3) if he will place in the Library a copy of his Department's standard letter issued to lone parents claiming income support after they have failed to attend a work-focused interview and failed to show good cause.
The administration of Jobcentre Plus is a matter for the acting chief executive of Jobcentre Plus, Mel Groves. I have asked him to provide the hon. Member with the information requested.
Widowed Parents Allowance
The information is not available.
Innovation, Universities and Skills
Departmental Art Works
The following works of art from the Government Art Collection are displayed in Lord Drayson's private office:
Daphne Reynolds—‘The Watchers’’;
John Piper—‘St James the Less, Westminster’;
David Bomberg—‘London River’.
The following works of art from the Government Art Collection are displayed in Siôn Simon's private office:
Howard Hodgkin—‘Blood’;
Howard Hodgkin—‘Sand’.
Other Ministers in this Department do not have works of art from the Government Art Collection displayed in their private offices.
Departmental Visits Abroad
Since 1999, the Government have published a list of all overseas travel by Cabinet Ministers costing over £500. Information for the financial year 2007-08 was published on 22 July 2008, Official Report, column 102WS, and for the first time included details of overseas visits undertaken by all Ministers. All travel by Ministers is undertaken in accordance with the ‘Ministerial Code’. Information going beyond what is already published can be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Foreign Students: USA
English-domiciled students studying in the UK who wish to take up a term of study of their course in the United States may be eligible to receive a grant to help cover the related travel costs. To qualify for the grant the student must be attending the overseas university or college for at least half the length of an academic quarter, which normally corresponds to a term. The grant meets the costs of:
travel within and outside the UK in order to attend the university or college
medical insurance for treatment provided outside the United Kingdom
visas required to attend the overseas institution
medical costs incurred to meet a mandatory condition of entry into a country (e.g. vaccination costs).
The grant is subject to an income assessment and the first £295 of travel costs incurred is not covered by the grant.
DIUS has responsibility for higher education in England only. The devolved administrations have responsibility for it in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.
Higher Education
There are no plans to reintroduce polytechnic colleges into the higher education system. Publicly funded degrees should offer the range and balance of qualifications which students and the wider economy require in the future and to do this the higher education system may need to ensure that there are more opportunities provided to individuals to enter by vocational routes. Although some institutions will meet a greater proportion of this need than others, this does not mean the re-establishment of the polytechnic divide.
Higher Education: Anti-Semitism
This Government deplore acts of racial or religious intolerance and we are committed to tackling anti-Semitism and any form of racial intolerance. Higher education institutions have the primary responsibility for ensuring that their students are not subject to threatening or abusive behaviour on campus and addressing any complaints received.
We are committed to encouraging higher education institutions to ensure that discrimination has no place in any of their policies or practices and to act swiftly when incidents or complaints are brought to their attention. The Department is currently in the process of establishing a dedicated sub-group to the Cross Government Working Group against anti-Semitism to facilitate discussions between the Jewish community and higher education stakeholders.
Higher Education: Research
The Department supports excellent research in universities through the dual support system of institutional funding through the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) and project-based funding through the Research Councils. The Department's grant letter to HEFCE asked them
“to continue to recognise and reward the highest levels of research excellence wherever it is found”.
The recent research assessment exercise (RAE), published in December last year demonstrates the world-class performance of university research in the UK: 54 per cent. of work was found to be of world-leading quality or internationally excellent. The RAE results drive institutional funding for research and HEFCE announced funding allocations on 5 March.
Research: Small Businesses
The SBRI is a mechanism by which Government Departments can seek to encourage the business community to develop innovative solutions to meet the Department's needs. All Departments are eligible to participate, and, following the successful outcome of the pilot programme, I encourage all those with appropriate research and development needs to consider using this mechanism.
Lord Drayson and Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury, Angela Eagle, wrote to ministerial colleagues on 5 November inviting participation in the scheme. The Technology Strategy Board, which manages the SBRI programme, has over the last year engaged with all central departments, to seek to identify suitable opportunities for the use of SBRI. As stated in my answer of 25 February, a £10 million competition with the Department for Communities and Local Government will be launched in March, and the Ministry of Defence, the Department of Health, and the Department for Transport also have advanced plans for SBRI competitions in 2009. The TSB is continuing to work with other Departments to identify further cases where the Departments could benefit from making use of SBRI to meet their technology development needs.
Children, Schools and Families
Building Schools for the Future Programme
We remain fully committed to the BSF programme and I currently expect funding for Building Schools for the Future (BSF) for both waves 5 and 6 projects to be determined in the same way as for previous waves, when local authorities receive approval of the business case for their project.
The Department is continuing to monitor the impact of the current economic conditions on capital programmes such as BSF, and is working with Partnerships for Schools and HM Treasury to ensure the programme moves forward as planned. On 3 March 2009, my right hon. Friend the Chief Secretary to the Treasury announced Government action to safeguard capital infrastructure investment in projects being delivered through the private finance initiative.
DCSF does not hold information on apprenticeship places that have been created by the Building Schools for the Future (BSF) programme. However, DCSF has responded to the pre-Budget report in November which announced that Government Departments and their Agencies committed that whenever they let a new construction contract they will consider making it a requirement that successful contractors have apprentices as a proportion of the project workforce. DCSF announced on 23 February 2009 that all construction companies winning contracts for the Building Schools for the Future programme will be required to have formal training programmes—creating up to an extra 1,000 apprenticeship places from June 2009—including posts in construction, information technology and facilities management.
Partnerships for schools is putting in place arrangements for monitoring the numbers of apprenticeships and training places in existing and new projects.
Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service: Standards
Matters concerning the review of inspection methodology are for Ofsted rather than the Department. In September 2008, Ofsted published a consultation document, “Inspection of Children and Court Advisory Support Services (CAFCASS) 2009-12.”
Ofsted is currently evaluating the responses to the consultation and its work to pilot the new arrangements. It is intended that a new framework for the inspection of CAFCASS will be implemented from April 2009.
Children In Care
The Information requested is not collected centrally by the Department.
Children: Day Care
Virtually all four year olds and 95 per cent. of three year olds take up some of their free early education entitlement. At present, pupils in the maintained sector are counted only as “full time” or “part time”, but from this summer, data will be collected via the School Census on the hours of free entitlement taken.
An estimate from the Childcare and Early Years Parents survey in 2007 showed that of the eligible three and four year olds benefiting from the free entitlement, nearly three-quarters (73 per cent.) had used 12-hours or more of their entitlement.
The first phase of the free entitlement for two year olds was for 7.5-hours per week in 32 local authorities which reached approximately 13,500 children between 2006-08. From April 2009, these local authorities, along with a further 31, will move to deliver up to 15-hours a week over 38-weeks a year. From September 2009 all remaining local authorities will begin delivering up to 10-hours a week, over 38-weeks a year. The different number of hours that will be delivered is a deliberate step to allow us to evaluate a range of approaches.
The latest figures on early education places for three and four year olds in England were published in Statistical First Release (SFR) 12/2008 “Provision for children under five years of age in England: January 2008”, available on my Department's website:
http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000790/index.shtml
Children: Protection
The advice was provided by senior officials.
Departmental Absenteeism
The Department issued guidance to staff on the days in question, advising them to make reasonable efforts to come into work and, if this was not possible, to work from home using, for example, the Department's remote access. Staff were also told to also take account of local advice in the light of weather conditions and travel arrangements.
Absences were handled locally by managers and information was not collected centrally on those unable to work. Therefore, the information on staff numbers, costs and working hours lost could only be obtained at disproportionate cost.
Departmental Art Works
The three works of art from the Government Art Collection selected for display in the Department's Private Office are all located in the Secretary of State's Office.
Their titles are:
An Accurate Map of the West Riding of Yorkshire;
A Field Near Vernham Dene; and
The New Houses of Parliament.
Departmental Scientists
The DCSF does not commission scientific research and advice. We do commission social and economic research and analysis in order to provide evidence to support policy-making activity across the full range of the Department’s responsibilities according to need. Our current forecast is that we will spend £31 million on social and economic research and analysis in 2008-09. In 2007-08, the figure was £27 million. We do not collect information on staff with a science or engineering degree centrally.
Departmental Surveys
In the last five years the Department (and the former Department for Education and Skills) has spent £94,363 on staff surveys. All surveys in the period were delivered by ORC International Ltd.
Cost (£) 2005-06 15,686 2006-07 10 2007-08 42,137 2008-09 36,540 1 No staff survey held.
Departmental Training
The Department believes that away days can be beneficial and necessary for staff development, team building and planning to help deliver the Children's Plan.
The organisation of away days outside the Department's buildings will be based on sound planning and, where accommodation costs and other charges are involved, our policies on appropriateness and value for money.
Education Maintenance Allowance: Lancashire
This is a matter for the Learning and Skills Council (LSC) who operate the education maintenance allowance (EMA) for the Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF). Mark Haysom the LSC's chief executive, will write to the hon. Member for West Lancashire with the information requested and a copy of his reply will be placed in the House Libraries.
Education: Young Offender Institutions
This is a matter for Ofsted. HM Chief Inspector, Christine Gilbert, has written to the hon. Member and a copy of her reply has been placed in the Libraries.
Letter from Christine Gilbert, dated 4 March 2009:
Your recent parliamentary question has been passed to me, as Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector, for reply.
From 1998 to March 2007, Ofsted inspected standards in education and training in the juvenile estate with Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons. From 1996 to April 2004, Ofsted inspected standards in education and training at local authority secure children’s homes and secure training centres with the Social Services Inspectorate; and from April 2004 to March 2007, it did so with the Commission for Social Care Inspection. Since April 2007, Ofsted has had sole responsibility for the inspection of secure children’s homes and secure training centres. Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons maintains its lead responsibility for the prison estate.
Prior to April 2007, Ofsted did not publish its own reports on juvenile estate establishments, including secure children’s homes and secure training centres, but contributed to the report of the lead inspectorate. Since April 2007, Ofsted has published reports on secure children’s homes and secure training centres. Please note that there have only been a small number of inspections annually.
Ofsted provides an annual summary of its assessment of this provision in Her Majesty’s Chief Inspectors’ Annual Reports. As Ofsted did not publish any of its own reports until 2007, the Annual Reports are the only continuous and comparative form of assessment relating to this area of provision over the past five years.
For the purposes of the following reports, the term ‘secure settings’ refers to secure children’s homes and secure training centres accommodating children and young people under 18 years of age, and other establishments accommodating Juvenile/Young People offenders.
The following excerpts are taken from the Annual Reports of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Schools 2004/05 and 2005/06, and Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services, and Skills for 2006/07 and 2007/08.
Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Schools Annual Report 2004/05
The quality of education and care: Provision for children and young people in secure settings
Main Findings
Provision across the range of secure settings and within types of setting varies widely. Some young people are well served; others, already disadvantaged, have a poor deal which does little to help them to improve their life chances. Establishments vary, for example, in the extent of specialist teaching facilities and resources and the range of options available to them. Generally, provision for students to work towards qualifications at level 2 and above is limited.
Out of 10 young offender institutions inspected, two were judged to be very good, six satisfactory and two unsatisfactory. The provision for juveniles (15-17 year-olds) was better than that for young offenders (18-21 year-olds) mainly because they benefited from additional resources for this age group from the Youth Justice Board. The appointment of special educational needs coordinators and learning support assistants has improved initial assessment, the targeting and quality of one-to-one support and the quality of pastoral care for juveniles.
The establishments judged to be very good featured: very good leadership; effective behaviour management, support and guidance; rigorous monitoring of attendance; and effective arrangements for young people unable or unwilling to attend classes. In the poorer establishments, much of the teaching lacked challenge; education, training and residential activities were poorly integrated and accreditation rates were low.
Three of the seven local authority children’s homes inspected were good or better; two were satisfactory, but two were unsatisfactory. In the best, there was a strong emphasis on assessing and monitoring students’ progress and liaison and support from the local authority were excellent. By contrast, insufficient emphasis on achievement, inadequate quality assurance arrangements and weak links between education and care staff characterised unsatisfactory practice.
Two of the three secure training centres inspected were very good. In these, there were wide opportunities for accreditation, the learning environment was attractive and provision well resourced. By contrast, two detention and immigration centres inspected were poorly resourced and accommodation in one was cramped. Despite these difficulties, teacher-pupil relationships in the centres were good. Pupils were well-behaved, keen to learn and supported each other, particularly in relation to resolving language difficulties.
Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Schools Annual Report 2005/06
The quality of education and care: Provision for young people in secure settings
Main Findings
Overall, standards across the range of secure settings remain too variable and the curriculum offered is often too narrow to meet the needs of the young people. Of 13 institutions inspected, two secure children’s homes and one young offender institution are inadequate.
Only one establishment, a secure training centre, is very good and two secure children’s homes and one young offender institution are good. There has been an improvement, however, in the management of the young people’s behaviour and it is satisfactory overall in the settings inspected. The more effective institutions are successful in meeting the needs of a wide range of young people, many of whom have had little or no experience of educational success. A minority of settings have developed an appropriate range of vocational and academic courses. In these institutions, young people enjoy their education and often make good progress; many experience success for the first time in their lives. However, levels of accreditation remain low in too many institutions and opportunities for progression to more advanced courses are limited. This is particularly pertinent for young people aged 16 and over in young offender institutions. More able young people are often working below their capabilities and few gain GCSE qualifications.
The range of vocational courses is narrow in too many institutions, restricting opportunities for young people to acquire the skills that will help them to gain employment or access to further training on their release from custody. Teaching of the basic skills of literacy and numeracy is often poor. Lessons fail to motivate or engage young people. In the more effective institutions, literacy and numeracy are linked successfully to vocational work and their life experiences.
The needs of young people with learning difficulties and/or disabilities are not always met appropriately. In the better settings, teaching is lively and engaging. Young people are given interesting and challenging tasks that they enjoy. They respond well to good teaching, make sound progress and are justifiably proud of their achievements. The collection of information about the young people’s achievements, progress and attendance is improving and is now available to support teaching staff more effectively. However, this information is used effectively in only a small number of institutions. Young people’s individual learning plans are not used successfully to plan their work or to monitor their progress.
The more successful settings draw on a variety of resources and external partners to develop creative and interesting educational experiences for young people. External agencies are often effective in raising the young people’s aspirations. Most institutions are successful in making the environment as attractive as possible, often in very difficult circumstances. Rewards and incentives are used effectively to motivate young people, but only in a minority of institutions.
In the settings inspected, the management of poor and inappropriate behaviour has improved in recent years and is satisfactory overall. It is good in institutions where the behaviour policy is clearly understood and consistently applied. Relationships between prison and education staff in young offender institutions are generally good. Some aspects of prison life, however, continue to have a negative effect on teaching and learning. For example, movement from residential to education units is often delayed, adversely affecting both punctuality and young people’s learning. There are too few opportunities for young people to share their opinions about the education and training they receive.
Arrangements for the care and progress of young people about to leave custody are not good enough. Insufficient attention is paid to preparing them for their return to the community. Careers education and guidance are often poor. The lack of appropriate education and training for these young people once they are released is a real concern.
In most of the settings inspected there has been steady improvement in leadership and management. Senior managers are now more focused on improving the quality of provision. Self-assessment and the rigour of lesson observations have improved.
Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills Annual Report 2006-07
Quality and Standards: Educational provision for young people in secure settings
The provision for young people with learning difficulties or disabilities is not always matched to their needs. Staff do not make effective use of individual learning plans in considering the next steps in learning or in tracking the progress of the young people.
The more effective institutions work with a range of external partners to plan challenging and imaginative programmes for learners and to raise their ambitions for the future. Staff in most institutions overcome considerable difficulties to make the accommodation as pleasant as possible through, for example, the imaginative use of learners’ artwork. Incentives are generally used well to encourage the young people.
Increasingly, planned educational provision within secure children’s homes is contributing to the five outcomes of the Every Child Matters legislation, especially to ‘be healthy’, with many units aspiring to the Healthy Schools initiative. However, little focus is given to the Every Child Matters agenda for children and young people in young offender institutions. Limited opportunities for release on temporary licence severely inhibit the preparation of young people to gain employment and so to achieve economic well-being on their return to the community.
The management of unacceptable behaviour has improved further in the institutions inspected. Behaviour is good in institutions where the behaviour policy is understood clearly and applied consistently. In young offender institutions, there has been a marked reduction in the number of young people being returned to residential wings from education for poor behaviour. Relationships between prison and residential care staff and education staff across the range of secure accommodation are generally good. Progress in making sure that education and training are given priority within settings is variable.
Too often, security issues inhibit access to appropriate provision for children and young people. There remain some aspects of institutional life which have an adverse effect on the quality of educational provision. For example, moving the young people from residential accommodation to teaching areas often takes too long so that they arrive late and learning time is lost.
The provision for young people about to return to the outside world remains uneven in quality. Not enough is done to help them prepare for their release and there are not enough opportunities for them to access vocational learning or to develop independent living skills. Links between education and resettlement departments are often tenuous. The quality of careers guidance and education is often inadequate. The failure to provide suitable education and training to young people for the community element of their sentences, or upon release, remains a significant concern.
The quality of leadership and management has improved in most of the secure estates inspected. Senior managers now place more emphasis on improving the quality of provision, but in some settings this has not yet resulted in improved outcomes. There is greater rigour in institutional self-assessment and in the evaluation of teaching and learning, but there is still some overestimation of effectiveness.
Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills Annual Report 2007/08
Quality and Standards: Educational provision for children and young people in secure settings
Provision of education and training in the four secure training centres was inspected during 2007/08. Of these, education and training are outstanding in one, good in two and satisfactory in the fourth. There were full inspections of seven secure children’s homes, of which one is outstanding, three are good and three are satisfactory. There were two full inspections of young offender institutions holding children; both of these institutions are satisfactory.
The improvements reported in last year’s Annual Report have been strengthened, especially in the behaviour of children and young people. In most institutions, leadership and management are successful in supporting children’s personal and social development. Education in the secure children’s homes inspected makes a strong contribution to the Every Child Matters outcomes, with children understanding and following healthy lifestyles and knowing how to stay safe.
On arrival in secure institutions, many children and young people have poor attitudes to learning and experiences of it; indeed, many are unused to participating in structured education of any kind. Behaviour is managed more successfully than in the past and improves quickly. Most behaviour is now good in the institutions inspected. This is achieved most effectively where care staff and teachers collaborate and manage behaviour consistently.
Initial assessment of children’s and young people’s levels of literacy and numeracy is well established and effective. Nearly all children and young people enter institutions with levels of literacy and numeracy well below those found nationally for their ages. There has been an appropriate emphasis on improving basic skills and children make very good progress when opportunities for improving literacy and numeracy are linked to subjects across the curriculum. Most young people leave custody with some form of accreditation in these essential skills and, more generally, levels of accreditation are now at least satisfactory in most of the institutions inspected.
Teaching and learning are generally best in vocational and practical subjects, where they are consistently at least satisfactory. In the best classes, teachers have high expectations of learners and plan interesting and varied activities. Less successful lessons provide insufficient challenge, the pace is too slow and young people are bored and lose concentration.
The range of vocational provision is too often narrow. Most children and young people have too few opportunities to gain work-related skills that will help them move on to further education, employment or additional training on release. Evening enrichment activities are available in most institutions and, in some cases, the skills gained by young people are accredited through external qualifications. Often, these activities add significantly to their enjoyment of education.
Guidance and support are generally strengths of the sector. Most institutions have effective initial assessment procedures that identify any additional support needs quickly, although this information is not always used well to inform teaching and learning. Children and young people are helped to settle in quickly through good induction procedures. Target-setting and monitoring of progress have improved; they are now generally good and, in a few cases, outstanding. Some secure children’s homes have developed a system of weekly tutorials which are used well to review progress. Teaching assistants generally provide effective support but, in a few cases, they are not appropriately qualified and are unsure of their role.
The improvements seen in the last two years in leadership and management are now having a positive impact, especially in the areas of managing behaviour and in guidance and support. Institutions are now producing more evaluative self-assessment reports. Frequently, managers identify the key weaknesses and take decisive action that improves outcomes for young people. Lesson observations by managers are now well established and, in most cases, this has contributed to improvements in teaching and learning. Centres use data more effectively to measure learners’ progress and to set challenging targets. Increasingly, institutions are developing procedures to seek the views of the young people and staff, but this is not consistent across the sector. Relationships between care and education staff are generally good, and communication between groups of staff has improved significantly. There is great variation in the quality of resources, especially in terms of accommodation and facilities.
A copy of this reply has been sent to Rt Hon Jim Knight MP, Minister of State for Schools and Learners, and will be placed in the library of both Houses.
GCE A-Level: Disadvantaged
This information would be identifiable and so can not be given out.
GCSE
In 2008, 209,961 (32.2 per cent.) pupils at the end of key stage 4 in all schools in England, achieved five or more A* to B grades at GCSE.
GCSE: North Yorkshire
The requested information on the percentage of eligible pupils in Vale of York constituency achieving grades A* and A-C in English and mathematics is given in the following table.
A* A-C A* A-C 2007 2.5 62.5 3.5 56.0 2006 3.9 55.0 4.4 50.4 2005 2.8 56.6 2.9 53.0 2004 2.8 55.3 2.4 46.5 2003 3.9 56.0 0.9 47.6 2002 2.5 57.4 2.4 50.1 2001 2.6 56.3 1.7 51.7 2000 2.5 54.3 2.0 48.3 1999 2.8 55.9 1.0 46.4 1998 3.1 54.4 1.4 43.6 1997 1.5 51.7 2.1 47.2 Notes: 1. Data from 1997 to 2004 are based on 15-year-old pupils at the start of the academic year. The 2005 to 2007 figure is based on pupils at the end of KS4. 2. Data from 2004 to 2007 include equivalents
GCSEs: Lancashire
The information requested is shown in the following table:
Percentage West Lancashire parliamentary constituency3 42.1 Lancashire local authority 50.8 England4 47.6 1 Figures are based on pupils at the end of key stage 4. 2 Figures are based on revised data. 3 Pupils attending maintained schools located in West Lancashire constituency. 4 Figure includes all schools.
General Certificate of Secondary Education
Girls have out-performed boys since GCSE examinations were introduced in 1988. In 2008 69.9 per cent. of girls and 60.9 per cent. of boys achieved 5+ A*-C grade GCSEs. Girls are ahead of boys at all stages of education. The gap in England has been broadly stable over two decades, and is in line with that in other OECD countries.
The reasons are complex but appear mainly related to differences of biology, maturation, and attitudes to learning and reading at different ages. The Department’s 2007 research paper “Gender and education: the evidence on pupils in England”, of which there is a copy in the Library of the House, sets out the research evidence.
Two points should be noted: first, boys’ GCSE attainment has improved sharply over the past decade, broadly keeping pace with that of girls; second, gender gaps can be minimised by good teaching practice and by the encouragement of reading, ensuring that pupils of both genders make good progress.
Through its “Gender Agenda” programme the Department has been leading a programme of action research activities designed to identify and spread good practice in raising boys’ motivation and attainment. An interim report has been published and a final report will be made available at the end of the programme.
Members: Correspondence
[holding answer 10 March 2009]: The Department's correspondence handling system shows no record of the letter in question. If the hon. Member forwards a copy of the letter to the Department it will be answered in line with Whitehall standards.
Orders and Regulations
The Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) was established on 28 June 2007. Its predecessors were the Department for Education and Employment (DfEE) from 5 July 1995 to 10 June 2001 and the Department for Education and Skills (DfES) from 11 June 2001 to 27 June 2007.
All statutory instruments are ‘made’ (signed) by Ministers or senior officials. Not all statutory instruments are required to be ‘laid’ before the House of Commons and House of Lords.
The records for the Department for Children, Schools and Families and its predecessors show only the numbers of statutory instruments made and not the numbers laid. The number of statutory instruments made each year since 1997 were as follows:
DfEE DfES DCSF 1997 70 — — 1998 144 — — 1999 231 — — 2000 164 — — 2001 91 100 — 2002 — 168 — 2003 — 142 — 2004 — 124 — 2005 — 150 — 2006 — 127 — 2007 — 113 44 2008 — — 132
Primary Education: Admissions
The Department does not collect data on offers of primary school places or on the number of unplaced children. Local authorities are under a duty to make sure that every child of compulsory school age has a suitable school place.
In reply to part (a) of your question, when determining policy on the provision of school places, the Department took no direct account of the birth rate or of GLA forecasts of the number of children entering primary education in 2000, 2005 or 2009. Local authorities are responsible for planning provision for their areas. The Department allocates basic need capital to enable authorities to fund new places in response to pupil number growth. To ensure that local authorities can plan strategically, funding is fixed for three years at the beginning of each spending review period (the current period runs from April 2008 to March 2011). In determining basic need allocations, the Department uses local authorities’ own pupil number forecasts, expecting authorities themselves to take account of local factors that will influence future pupil numbers such as birth rate, new housing and population migration. The Department relies on the accuracy of local authority forecasts as it does not hold back funds to allow for future changes.
In reply to part (b) of your question, the Department does not collect information on the extent to which local education authorities in Greater London take account of the birth rate and GLA forecasts of the number of children entering primary education.
All basic need resources for 2008-09 to 2010-11 have been allocated. However, the Department is reviewing emerging pupil number trends to inform the spending review period 2011-12 onwards and will consider whether to continue allocating all basic need funding at the beginning of a new CSR period.
Pupil Referral Units
The requested information has been placed in the Libraries.
Pupils: Absenteeism
The information requested is shown in the following table for 2006/07 only. Information for previous years is not available.
By pupil residence By school location Number Percentage Number Percentage 0-10% most deprived areas 60,249 7.4 33,296 5.4 10-20% 46,781 6.4 32,133 5.1 20-30% 37,625 5.6 31,268 4.8 30-40% 30,003 4.7 30,644 4.5 40-50% 23,332 3.9 29,592 4.3 50-60% 19,121 3.2 28,498 4.0 60-70% 15,845 2.7 23,105 3.6 70-80% 13,321 2.3 21,544 3.4 80-90% 10,653 1.8 22,011 3.3 90-100% least deprived areas 8,510 1.5 20,863 3.2 Total 265,440 4.1 272,954 4.1 1 Number of Persistent Absentees expressed as a percentage of the total number of enrolments. 2 Includes middle schools as deemed. 3 School coverage is maintained primary and secondary schools, maintained and non-maintained special schools, city technology colleges and academies. Excludes general hospital schools. 4 2004 Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index at Super Output Area level. 5 Pupil residency figures include only those pupils with a valid postcode.
Religion: Curriculum
Religious education (RE) is a statutory part of the basic school curriculum. Schools must teach RE according to locally agreed syllabuses or in the case of voluntary aided schools with a religious character, according to the trust deed of the school. Local Standing Advisory Councils for RE (SACREs) have the responsibility to ensure that local syllabuses develop pupils’ knowledge, understanding and awareness of Christianity and the major religions represented in the country and reflect the values and traditions of the community. RE encourages respect for those holding different beliefs and helps promote pupils’ moral, cultural and spiritual development.
In 2004, the Department with the QCA published a non-statutory framework for RE which has been supported by all the main faith groups and the British Humanist Association. It says that pupils should learn about Christianity throughout each key stage and, by the end of Key Stage 3, pupils should have encountered the other five principal religions (Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam, Judaism and Sikhism) in sufficient depth. It also recommends that pupils have opportunities to study other religious traditions such as the Baha’i faith, Jainism, Zoroastrianism and secular philosophies such as humanism.
Schools: Admissions
Following local consultation, maintained schools may introduce selection of up to 10 per cent. of their intake on the basis of aptitude for prescribed subjects.
As these arrangements are determined locally, we do not hold data centrally on the number of schools who do so.
Schools: Anti-Semitism
The Secretary of State received one letter on this issue since the beginning of December 2008. This was a letter dated 1 December from the Community Security Trust. That letter followed previous exchanges and expressed the Trust’s hope that the Department’s Targeted Capital Fund might provide additional funding for security at Jewish schools.
Schools: Warnings
Local authorities are not currently required to inform the Secretary of State if they issue a warning notice but since April 2007 (when the Education and Inspections Act 2006 came into force) have been under a duty to copy all warning notices to Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Schools.
Between April 2007 and August 2008 17 warning notices were issued to schools Between September 2008 and mid February 2009, 24 warning notices have been issued.
Science: GCSE
The figures available are given in the following table.
2008 2007 2006 2005 England 592,209 599,687 592,850 583,282 Maintained Schools1 549,813 551,401 544,766 536,866 Kent1 15,595 15,563 15,263 15,218 Ashford2 1,118 986 1,036 1,045 1 Including academies. 2 Based on school location. Notes: 1. The data for 2004 are not comparable. 2. Data presented on same basis as table 10, 11 and 12 of the 2008 GCSE SFR. Source: Attainment and Achievement Table
In 2008, 1,474 maintained mainstream schools entered one or more pupils for either physics, chemistry or biology GCSE.
Secondary Education: Chelmsford
2008 was the first year that local authorities were required to provide data to the Secretary of State on secondary school offers made to parents on the day that parents are notified of their school places. Data was not collected at a constituency level. Figures for Essex local authority, in which West Chelmsford constituency is situated, showed that 19.2 per cent. (3,087) of children resident in that authority who were eligible to transfer to secondary school in September 2008 were not offered a place at their parents' first choice school. 96 per cent. were offered a preferred school.
The day that parents are notified of their secondary school place is the first part of the process of obtaining a preferred school. These figures are likely to have changed by September as places became available or appeals were successful.
Data on 2009 secondary school applications and offers will be published on 12 March.
Social Services: Co-operation
Since 1 January 2008, the Children Act 2004, which followed the Victoria Climbié inquiry and the “Every Child Matters” Green Paper, has required local authorities to have a single director of children’s services with responsibility for education and children’s social services. This single officer provides a clear line of accountability for, and strong leadership of, all children’s services.
Inspectorates assess the effectiveness of children’s services. Until 2008, Ofsted made an annual performance assessment (APA) of each council’s children’s services. Inspectorates undertook a joint area review (JAR) of children’s services in each local authority area during the period from 2005 to 2008.
From 2009, APAs and JARs will be replaced by a new comprehensive area assessment (CAA), led by the Audit Commission and including Ofsted and other relevant inspectorates. CAAs will report annually on services, including children’s services, in each local authority area. Ofsted will lead a programme to inspect children’s safeguarding and services for looked-after children, in each local authority area every three years. Inspectors may also decide to carry out inspections on other services, should a CAA report indicate that they are poor and not improving.
Special Educational Needs
The Department does not collect the information on how much was spent on issuing statements of special educational needs. However, the information provided to the Department by local authorities on their total planned net expenditure on the administration, assessment and co-ordination of statements for 2008-09 is contained within the following table.
Local authority name Table 1: 2.0.2 SEN administration assessment and co-ordination England 86,016,000 Barking and Dagenham 277,000 Barnet 1,330,000 Barnsley 297,000 Bath and NE Somerset 188,000 Bedfordshire 716,000 Bexley 290,000 Birmingham 2,180,000 Blackburn and Darwen 294,000 Blackpool 293,000 Bolton 360,000 Bournemouth 300,000 Bracknell Forest 196,000 Bradford 893,000 Brent 990,000 Brighton and Hove 234,000 Bromley 829,000 Buckinghamshire 2,926,000 Bury 0 Calderdale 134,000 Cambridgeshire 815,000 Camden 982,000 Cheshire 1,334,000 City of Bristol 473,000 City of Kingston-upon-Hull 337,000 City of London 8,000 City of Nottingham 68,000 City of Peterborough 357,000 City of Plymouth 241,000 Cornwall 1,232,000 Coventry 497,000 Croydon 670,000 Cumbria 1,028,000 Darlington 219,000 Derby 100,000 Derbyshire 1,202,000 Devon 656,000 Doncaster 365,000 Dorset 569,000 Dudley 961,000 Durham 766,000 Ealing 457,000 East Riding of Yorkshire 127,000 East Sussex 1,370,000 Enfield 555,000 Essex 0 Gateshead 436,000 Gloucestershire 445,000 Greenwich 765,000 Hackney 524,000 Halton 187,000 Hammersmith and Fulham 390,000 Hampshire 2,035,000 Haringey 680,000 Harrow 171,000 Hartlepool 81,000 Havering 339,000 Herefordshire 586,000 Hertfordshire 2,781,000 Hillingdon 507,000 Hounslow 479,000 Isle of Wight 261,000 Isles of Scilly 7,000 Islington 631,000 Kensington and Chelsea 511,000 Kent 3,126,000 Kingston-upon-Thames 298,000 Kirklees 339,000 Knowsley 339,000 Lambeth 129,000 Lancashire 0 Leeds 344,000 Leicester City 501,000 Leicestershire 624,000 Lewisham 608,000 Lincolnshire 2,105,000 Liverpool 97,000 Luton 286,000 Manchester 134,000 Medway 353,000 Merton 545,000 Middlesbrough 286,000 Milton Keynes 1,002,000 Newcastle upon Tyne 28,000 Newham 1,444,000 Norfolk 1,769,000 North East Lincolnshire 599,000 North Lincolnshire 107,000 North Somerset 286,000 North Tyneside 293,000 North Yorkshire 980,000 Northamptonshire 674,000 Northumberland 575,000 Nottinghamshire 657,000 Oldham 247,000 Oxfordshire 1,024,000 Poole 213,000 Portsmouth 203,000 Reading 118,000 Redbridge 0 Redcar and Cleveland 95,000 Richmond-upon-Thames 355,000 Rochdale 367,000 Rotherham 337,000 Rutland 186,000 Salford 392,000 Sandwell 803,000 Sefton 134,000 Sheffield 579,000 Shropshire 92,000 Slough 260,000 Solihull 178,000 Somerset 1,322,000 South Gloucestershire 449,000 South Tyneside 413,000 Southampton 296,000 Southend 305,000 Southwark 635,000 St Helens 250,000 Staffordshire 834,000 Stockport 389,000 Stockton-on-Tees 271,000 Stoke 306,000 Suffolk 469,000 Sunderland 365,000 Surrey 1,866,000 Sutton 562,000 Swindon 281,000 Tameside 385,000 Telford and Wrekin 331,000 Thurrock 383,000 Torbay 161,000 Tower Hamlets 737,000 Trafford 496,000 Wakefield 159,000 Walsall 498,000 Waltham Forest 666,000 Wandsworth 632,000 Warrington 401,000 Warwickshire 1,410,000 West Berkshire 229,000 West Sussex 513,000 Westminster 810,000 Wigan 939,000 Wiltshire 946,000 Windsor and Maidenhead 245,000 Wirral 382,000 Wokingham 616,000 Wolverhampton 353,000 Worcestershire 1,613,000 York 57,000 Notes: Bury, Essex, Lancashire and Redbridge local authorities have recorded zero for line 2.0.2. These LAs have recorded some elements of SEN administration assessment and co-ordination within other SEN lines in the data collection. Lines include 2.0.1 (Educational Psychology Service), 1.2.1 (Provision for pupils with SEN, (including assigned resources), 1.2.2 (Provision for pupils with SEN, provision not included in line 1.2.1) and 1.2.3 (Support for inclusion). Detailed guidance is provided by DCSF on how to complete various lines in the data collection. It is however for each local authority to determine how they eventually record these activities.
This is a matter for Ofsted. HM Chief Inspector, Christine Gilbert, has written to the hon. Member and a copy of her reply has been placed in the Libraries.
Letter from Christine Gilbert:
Your recent parliamentary question has been passed to me, as Her Majesty's Chief Inspector, for a response.
Tables A-J show all maintained special schools which have been placed in special measures in each academic year in the last ten years. Special measures is an Ofsted category, defined at present in the Education Act 2005, meaning that a school is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement.
Please be aware that the framework for inspecting maintained special schools changed in January 2000, September 2003 and September 2005. As a result, there has been no consistent 'inadequate' category over this period. These tables are, therefore, limited to those maintained special schools placed in special measures, as this category has been in place throughout the period in question.
A copy of this reply has been sent to right hon. Jim Knight MP, Minister of State for Schools and Learners, and will be placed in the Library of both Houses.
URN School name LA name 132008 Burwood School Bromley 113963 Longspee School Poole 131296 Montrose Wigan 115817 Cam House School Gloucestershire 123631 Southall School Telford and Wrekin 119882 North Cliffe School Lancashire
URN School name LA name 113636 Barley Lane School Devon 119869 Massey Hall School Lancashire 102557 Syon Park School Hounslow 110946 Spring Common School Cambridgeshire 123939 The Priory School Somerset 111502 Cloughwood School Cheshire 108129 Elmete Wood-BESD Leeds 126170 Cornfield School, Littlehampton West Sussex 128190 Pathways Special School Redcar & Cleveland 115451 Homestead School Essex 104496 Highfield School Knowsley
URN School name LA name 115443 Priory School Southend-On-Sea 122962 Woodlands School Nottingham City
URN School name LA name 107468 Wedgwood School and Community Nursery Bradford 109747 Oak Bank School Bedfordshire 132156 Kingshill School Wigan 126168 Abbotsford Community Special School West Sussex 119895 Brookfield School Lancashire 106968 Kelford School Rotherham 106971 Whiston Grange School Rotherham 109397 Wansdyke School Bath and North East Somerset
URN School name LA name 103761 Dartmouth School Coventry 109398 Lime Grove Special School Bath and North East Somerset 125457 St Nicholas School Surrey 115819 Sandford School Gloucestershire 109741 Rainbow School Bedfordshire 122154 The Orchard School Northamptonshire 123346 Northfield School Oxfordshire 105614 Meade Hill School Manchester 105755 Hardman Fold Community Special School Oldham 103880 The Old Park School Dudley 106548 Two Porches School Wigan 131491 Redgrave School Worcestershire 115475 Lexden Springs School Essex
URN School name LA name 131817 Brookfield School Herefordshire 101853 Beckmead School Croydon 107173 East Hill Primary School Sheffield 119033 Halstead Place School Kent 107181 Dr John Worrall School Sheffield 133442 The Michael Tippett School Lambeth 132122 Mount Gilbert School Telford and Wrekin 133432 Silverdale School North Tyneside 132157 Highlea Secondary School Wigan 106011 Mew Park High School Salford 118140 Oakfield Kingston Upon Hull 108121 Stonegate School Leeds 131988 Thomas Bewick School Newcastle Upon Tyne 133401 Waterside School Greenwich 113648 Brook Green Centre for Learning Plymouth 105623 Southern Cross School Manchester 104026 Whittington Grange School Sandwell 100761 Anerley School for Boys Lewisham
URN School name LA name 131692 Lever Park School Bolton 130353 Oaklands School Leicester City 116638 Hawthorns School Hampshire 131598 Ian Mikardo School Tower Hamlets 110937 Littleton House School Cambridgeshire 105624 Castlefield School Manchester
URN School name LA name 102878 Little Heath School Redbridge 131594 Nightingale School Wandsworth 102557 Syon Park School Hounslow 125466 Wey House School Surrey 109747 Oak Bank School Bedfordshire 131491 Redgrave School Worcestershire 117050 Cliffey House School Worcestershire 107800 Hartshead Moor School Kirklees 103115 Hawkswood School and Centre Waltham Forest
URN School name LA name 111779 King Edwin School Stockton-on-Tees 110189 Phoenix College Reading 118151 South Wolds School East Riding of Yorkshire 126547 St Lukes School Swindon 132008 Burwood School Bromley 103606 Baskerville School Birmingham 115449 Ramsden Hall School Essex 110938 The Lady Adrian Special School Cambridgeshire 104414 Tettenhall Wood School Wolverhampton 125480 Philip Southcote School Surrey 104739 Lower Lee School Liverpool 106545 Hindley Borsdane Brook School Wigan 109399 Filton Park School South Gloucestershire 104979 Merefield School Sefton 102261 Whittlesea School Harrow
URN School name LA name 118144 Kings Mill School East Riding of Yorkshire 107179 Deerlands School Sheffield 111496 Fox Wood Special School Warrington 124905 Warren School Suffolk 108122 Richard Oastler School Leeds 107804 Nortonthorpe Hall School Kirklees 101395 Northway School Barnet 108742 Greenfields School South Tyneside 114678 The Alternative Centre for Education Brighton and Hove 109412 Fulford School City of Bristol 103628 Oscott Manor School Birmingham 102792 Beckton Special School Newham 104273 Daw End School Walsall 108882 Sunningdale School Sunderland 125795 River House School Warwickshire 125479 John Nightingale School Surrey 120362 Millgate School Leicester City
The information requested is shown in the following tables.
Percentage of children with a statement of SEN IDACI decile4 By pupil residency By school location 0-10% most deprived areas 3.4 2.9 10-20% 3.4 3.2 20-30% 3.4 2.9 30-40% 3.1 3.4 40-50% 2.9 2.8 50-60% 2.6 2.7 60-70% 2.5 2.7 70-80% 2.3 2.5 80-90% 2.2 2.7 90-100% least deprived areas 2.1 2.7
Percentage of children with SEN but without a statement IDACI decile4 By pupil residency By school location 0-10% most deprived areas 26.0 24.3 10-20% 23.8 22.9 20-30% 21.6 20.7 30-40% 19.4 19.1 40-50% 17.3 17.4 50-60% 15.3 16.4 60-70% 13.9 15.5 70-80% 12.6 14.7 80-90% 11.6 13.8 90-100% least deprived areas 9.9 12.8 1 Excludes dually registered pupils. 2 Includes maintained and non-maintained special schools. Excludes general hospital schools. 3 Excludes pupils whose SEN status is unknown. 4 Income Deprivation Affecting Children Indices. Source: Spring 2008 School Census.
Special Educational Needs: Disadvantaged
The information requested is as follows.
Primary schools Secondary schools4 2004 2007 2008 2004 2007 2008 0 to 10% most deprived 24.8 26.7 26.6 25.8 29.5 31.4 10 to 20% 22.9 24.6 24.9 22.8 26.3 27.9 20 to 30% 21.0 22.4 23.3 20.2 23.1 24.8 30 to 40% 19.2 20.9 21.3 17.5 20.4 21.8 40 to 50% 17.4 18.8 19.1 15.3 17.7 19.4 50 to 60% 15.6 17.0 17.2 13.5 15.7 16.9 60 to 70% 14.2 15.4 15.9 12.2 14.3 15.3 70 to 80% 13.0 14.3 14.5 10.7 12.8 13.8 80 to 90% 11.9 13.0 13.4 9.8 11.6 12.8 90 to 100% least deprived 10.5 11.7 11.7 8.3 10.1 10.8 1 Excludes dually registered pupils. 2 Excludes pupils whose SEN status is unknown. 3 Income Deprivation Affecting Children Indices. 4 Includes CTCs and academies. Source: School Census
Special Educational Needs: Pupil Exclusions
As part of the Department’s efforts to reduce burdens on educational establishments, separate collections of exclusion information ceased in 2006. For mainstream schools, exclusions data is now returned through the School Census. A pilot was held to collect School Census data from Pupil Referral Units. The issues from that pilot are being addressed and a Pupil Referral Unit Census, including exclusion information, will be introduced in January 2010.
Teachers: Sick Leave
The information requested is not available broken down by phase of education or decile of area deprivation.
Information for full-time and part-time teacher sickness absence in local authority maintained schools in England in calendar years 2000 to 2007 is available in table 13 of the school workforce statistical first release and is available at the following link:
http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgatewav/DB/SFR/s000813/SFR262008 tables.xls
Duchy of Lancaster
Central Office of Information: Manpower
The information requested falls within the responsibility of the Central Office of Information. I have asked the chief executive to reply.
Letter from Alan Bishop, dated 30 January 2009:
As Chief Executive of the Central Office of Information (COI), I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question (249953) to place in the Library a copy of the information held on the Knowledge Archive and Retain databases detailing information on employee headcount, job titles in use and allocation of staff between divisions in each year since 2006-07.
The Knowledge Archive is an IT programme that categorises jobs by different headings such as type or subject in order to locate them more easily in our records. It does not have data about employee headcount, job titles or staff allocation between divisions.
Retain is a proprietary resource planning IT tool used in just one division of COI to help manage project workflow. It does not have data about employee headcount, COI wide job titles or staff allocation between divisions.
Disclosure of Information: Home Office
Eco-towns
The Duchy of Lancaster has made no bids and has no involvement in eco-town developments.
Government Departments: Manpower
The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.
Letter from Karen Dunnell, dated March 2009:
As National Statistician I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question concerning how many people have been employed by Government departments or agencies on (a) a permanent basis and (b) a temporary basis in each year since 1997, broken down by department or agency; and in each case how many employees were (i) born in the UK and (ii) not born in the UK. (261035)
The Office for National Statistics collects detailed diversity statistics for people employed by Government departments and agencies as part of the Annual Civil Service Employment Survey (ACSES). Information relating to whether employees were born (or not born) in the UK has never been collected as part of Civil Service Statistics.
The number of people employed by Government departments or agencies on a permanent and temporary basis up to 2005 was published by Cabinet Office and is available on-line:
http://beta.civilservice.gov.uk/about/who/statistics/archived-reports.aspx
The number of people employed by Government departments or agencies on a permanent and temporary basis, post-2005, as published by Office for National Statistics, is detailed in Annex A.
Headcount 20062,3 20074 20085 Department Permanent Temporary/casual Permanent Temporary/casual Permanent Temporary/casual Attorney-General’s Departments Attorney-General’s Office 40 0 50 0 50 0 Crown Prosecution Service 9,040 10 8,410 370 8,330 400 Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate 40 0 40 10 40 10 Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office — — 300 0 290 0 Serious Fraud Office — — 310 0 310 * Treasury Solicitor 720 0 700 20 750 10 Business, Enterprise and regulatory Reform6 Department of Trade and Industry6 4,570 20 — — — — Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (excl. agencies) — — 3,430 10 3,450 20 Advisory Conciliation and Arbitration Service — — 730 60 740 60 Companies House — — 1,120 * 1,120 70 Insolvency Service 2,190 30 2,430 20 2,530 10 Office of Fair Trading — — 570 10 580 10 Office of Gas and Electricity Market — — 280 10 280 20 Postal Services Commission — — 60 * 60 * Small Business Service7 180 * — — — — Employment Tribunals Service8 — — — — — — Cabinet Office Cabinet Office (excl. agencies) — — 1,360 20 1,230 10 Privy Council Office9 — — — — — — Other Cabinet Office agencies Central Office of information — — 620 50 690 110 National School of Government — — 250 0 240 0 Parliamentary Counsel Office — — 80 0 70 0 HM Treasury HM Treasury 1,170 60 1,130 60 1,080 70 HM Revenue and Customs HM Revenue and Customs10 — — 89,910 2,200 88,900 2,050 Former Inland Revenue10 79,620 0 — — — — Former Customs and Excise10 — — — — — — Valuation Office 4,770 0 4,360 20 4,280 30 Chancellor’s other departments Debt Management Office — — 70 * 80 * Government Actuary’s Department 100 0 100 0 100 0 National Savings and Investments — — 120 * 130 * Office for National Statistics 3,530 230 3,240 230 3,160 200 Office of Government Commerce — — 240 10 180 50 OGC Buying.solutions — — 280 * 260 * Royal Mint 730 120 670 50 710 40 Charity Commission Charity Commission 550 10 500 10 490 10 Children, Schools and Families Department for Children, Schools and Families11 — — 3,490 20 3,340 10 Education and Skills Department for Education and Skills12 4,320 20 — — — — Innovation, Universities and Skills Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills13 — — 790 * 790 * National Weights and Measures Laboratory 50 * 50 * 50 0 UK Intellectual Property Office 960 0 1,010 0 1,000 0 Office for Standards in Education Office for Standards in Education — — 2,630 120 2,460 110 Communities and Local Government Department for Communities and Local Government (excl. agencies) 3,660 40 2,880 60 2,930 60 Fire Service College — — 250 0 240 * Ordnance Survey 1,450 0 1,400 20 1,390 20 Planning Inspectorate 960 20 860 0 840 0 Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre — — 50 * 50 * Culture, Media and Sport Department for Culture, Media and Sport 580 0 520 * 470 10 Royal Parks 90 10 90 10 100 0 Defence Ministry of Defence 74,720 1,140 70,210 930 68,220 790 Royal Fleet Auxiliary 2,370 0 2,350 0 2,280 0 Army Base Repair Organisation 2,150 0 2,160 20 2,340 30 Defence Aviation Repair Agency 2,500 0 2,030 20 2,000 20 Defence Science and Technology Laboratory 3,390 0 3,350 40 3,410 40 Meteorological Office 1,700 0 1,660 20 1,770 20 UK Hydro graphic Office 970 0 1,040 10 1,040 10 Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (excl. agencies) 5,690 120 3,630 50 3,050 40 Animal Health 1,430 60 1,690 40 1,640 30 Central Science Laboratory 680 70 640 30 640 20 Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science 550 * 550 10 530 10 Government Decontamination Services 20 * 20 * 30 * Marine Fisheries Agency 160 0 180 * 180 0 Office of Water Services 190 10 200 10 200 10 Pesticides Safety Directorate 200 10 190 * 180 * Rural Payments Agency — — 3,550 200 3,440 100 Veterinary Laboratories Agency 1,320 30 1,290 30 1,280 20 Veterinary Medicines Directorate 150 0 140 0 140 0 Export Credit Guarantee Department Export Credit Guarantee Department 260 * 220 0 210 0 Foreign and Commonwealth Office Foreign and Commonwealth Office (excl. agencies) 6,610 50 6,070 0 5,950 0 Wilton Park Executive Agency 70 0 80 0 70 0 Health Department of Health (excl. agencies) 2,590 40 2,200 30 2,180 40 Food Standards Agency — — 780 20 770 20 Meat Hygiene Service — — 1,330 10 1,230 10 Medical and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency — — 830 40 860 40 National Healthcare Purchasing and Supplies Agency — — 320 10 270 * NHS Business Services Authority14 — — 250 0 240 0 Home Office Home Office (excl. Agencies) 24,830 460 2,670 90 2,720 50 Border and Immigration Agency15 — — 18,430 210 19,290 70 Criminal Records Bureau — — 430 0 480 0 Identity and Passport Service — — 4,030 20 4,050 10 Office for Security and Counter-Terrorism16 — — 220 10 250 * Assets Recovery Agency17 — — 180 10 — — Justice Ministry of Justice (excl. agencies) — — 3,590 110 3,680 110 HM Courts Service — — 20,960 500 20,830 610 Land Registry 8,500 30 8,210 30 8,020 40 National Archives — — 600 10 610 10 Public Guardianship Office — — 330 * 310 * Public Sector Prison Service 48,010 1,140 49,170 1,130 49,970 1,280 Scotland Office 50 0 30 0 60 0 Tribunals Service — — 2,850 140 2,840 140 Wales Office — — 50 * 50 10 International Development Department for International Development — — 1,740 0 1,670 * Northern Ireland Office Northern Ireland Office 170 0 140 * 130 * Security and Intelligence Services Security and Intelligence Services 5,130 10 5,260 0 5,320 0 Transport Department for Transport (excl. agencies) 2,280 0 2,000 20 2,020 20 Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency 6,710 270 6,690 570 6,440 170 Driving Standards Agency 2,740 10 2,650 0 2,700 * Government Car and Despatch Agency — — 290 * 310 * Highways Agency 3,430 0 3,480 10 3,510 10 Maritime and Coastguard Agency — — 1,240 30 1,180 50 Office of Rail Regulation — — 330 10 330 10 Vehicle and Operator Services Agency 2,660 0 2,360 110 2,430 120 Vehicle Certification Agency 110 0 120 * 130 * Work and Pensions DWP Corporate and Shared Services18 11,200 410 — — — — DWP Corporate Services18 — — 5,710 50 5,650 40 DWP Shared Services18 — — 4,600 120 4,450 140 Child Support Agency 12,890 340 11,690 40 10,710 20 Disability and Carers Service 7,300 70 6,550 60 6,270 * Job Centre Plus 79,040 2,210 73,700 1,160 73,320 1,020 Pension Service 14,330 660 12,500 270 11,670 120 The Health and Safety Executive 4,010 0 3,780 0 3,600 0 The Rent Service 0 0 650 0 570 0 Scottish Government Scottish Government (excl. agencies) 5,190 80 4,370 40 4,500 90 Communities Scotland 440 * 400 * 360 * Courts Group 40 0 40 0 30 0 Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service — — 1,560 70 1,560 80 Fisheries Research Services 310 20 310 20 310 10 General Register Scotland 250 10 270 10 280 10 Historic Scotland 990 100 1,000 70 1,020 70 HM Inspectorate of Education 200 * 200 * 200 * Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland 70 0 70 0 80 0 National Archives for Scotland 150 * 150 10 150 10 Office of Accountant in Bankruptcy 110 * 120 * 100 * Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator 30 0 40 0 50 0 Registers of Scotland 1,440 20 1,350 10 1,280 30 Scottish Agricultural Scientific Agency 150 10 140 10 140 10 Scottish Buildings Standards Agency 30 0 30 0 30 0 Scottish Court Service 1,200 40 1,290 0 1,400 0 Scottish Fisheries Protection Agency 320 * 310 * 300 10 Scottish Prison Service — — 4,010 40 4,000 40 Scottish Public Pensions Agency 220 * 220 * 220 0 Social Work Inspection Agency 70 * 50 0 50 0 Student Awards Agency 150 * 150 * 140 * Transport Scotland 220 * 250 * 250 * Welsh Assembly Welsh Assembly Government 5,760 310 5,690 340 5,680 480 ESTYN 100 0 90 0 100 0 Assembly Parliamentary Service19 — — — — — — All employees 477,870 8,290 521,620 10,210 515,660 9,490 1 Numbers are rounded to the nearest ten, and numbers less than five are represented by “*”. Data not available are represented by “—”. 2 Collection reference date 30 September 2006. 3 The data for 2006 is based on the Mandate collection which provides approximately 80 per cent. coverage of Civil Service departments and agencies. 4 Collection reference date 30 September 2007. 5 Collection reference dale 31 March 2008. 6 The Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform was formed in June 2007 from part of the former Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), the Better Regulation Executive (BRE from the Cabinet Office and the Regional Economic Performance Unit from the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG). 7 For the 2007 and 2008 collections data for the Small Business Service was included as part of the main Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) data. 8 Employment Tribunals Service—Department for Trade and Industry (now Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform) funding ceased from April 2006, as responsibility transferred to Department for Constitutional Affairs (now Ministry of Justice). 9 Privy Council Office ceased to exist 1 April 2007. 10 HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) was formed on 18 April 2005, following the merger of Inland Revenue and HM Customs and Excise Departments. 11 Department for Children, Schools and Families was formed from part of the Department for Education and Skills in June 2007. 12 Department for Education and Skills (DFES) ceased to exist in June 2007. It was replaced by two new Departments, namely, Department for Children, Schools and Families and Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills. 13 Department for innovation, Universities and Skills was formed from part of the Department for Education and Skills in June 2007 14 NHS Business Services Authority was created 1 October 2005 and began operating on 1 April 2006. 15 Border and Immigration agency were formed 1 April 2007. 16 Office for Security and Counter-Terrorism was formed July 2007. 17 Assets Recovery Agency ceased to exist in its own right as of March 2008. 18 For the 2006 collection DWP provided combined data for its Corporate and Shared Service. For 2007 and 2008 separate data returns were provided for DWP Corporate Services and DWP Shared Services. 19 From 1 April 2007 Assembly Parliamentary Service were no longer classified as Civil Service. Source: (Unpublished) Annual Civil Service Employment Survey and Mandate Collection.
Government Departments: Publicity
The information requested falls within the responsibility of the Central Office of Information. I have asked the chief executive to reply.
Letter from Alan Bishop, dated 30 January 2009:
As Chief Executive of the Central Office of Information (COI), I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question [247596] Government expenditure on public relations, advertising and marketing on figures held by COI for year from 1995 to 2005.
These are listed in the table below.
Year £ million 1995-06 76 1996-07 81.2 1997-08 68.6 1998-09 126.7 1999-2000 148.6 2000-01 227.1 2001-02 196.7 2002-03 189.8 2003-04 233.6 2004-05 251
Iraq: Weapons
(2) whether (a) Mr. Williams and (b) any other communications official subsequently drafted any part of the dossier (i) on and (ii) after 9 September 2002;
(3) whether his Department holds a record of the identities of those officials who drafted any element of the 2002 Iraq dossier on 9 and 10 September 2002 prior to the despatch of a draft by John Scarlett to Alastair Campbell on the evening of 10 September 2002;
(4) who the authors were of the documents submitted by his Department to Lord Hutton's Inquiry and catalogued CAB/23/0005 to CAB/23/0014; which officials added handwritten notes to the documents; and (a) for what purpose and (b) on what date those documents were produced;
(5) whether the inclusion in the 2002 Iraq dossier of reference to intelligence suggesting that Iraq could launch weapons of mass destruction within 45 minutes resulted from the discussion of the Joint Intelligence Committee's assessment of 9 September 2002 at a meeting of the dossier drafting group on the afternoon of 9 September 2002.
[holding answer 27 February 2009]: Matters relating to the weapons of mass destruction (WMD) dossier were examined in great detail by the inquiry led by Lord Hutton, Lord Butler's ‘Review of Intelligence on Weapons of Mass Destruction’ and the Intelligence and Security Committee's report ‘Iraqi WMD—Intelligence and Assessments’.
Media Monitoring Unit
The information requested falls within the responsibility of the Central Office of Information. I have asked the chief executive to reply.
Letter from Alan Bishop, dated 30 January 2009:
As Chief Executive of the Central Office of Information (COI), I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question [250338] listing what individual annual subscription fees were paid to the Media Monitoring Unit by each subscribing Government department, agency and non-departmental body in the most recent year for which figures are available.
These figures are listed in the following table.
Customer Name Total (£) Attorney General's Office 12,500.00 Bank of England 9,400.00 Cabinet Office 18,500.00 Cabinet Office Communications 75,000.00 Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre 4,500.00 Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform 68,700.00 Department for Children, Schools and Families 68,700.00 Department for Communities and Local Government 75,000.00 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 62,700.00 Department for International Development 30,000.00 Department for Transport 68,700.00 Department for Work and Pensions 68,700.00 Department of Health 68,700.00 Food Standards Agency 22,150.00 Foreign and Commonwealth Office 118,500.00 Health and Safety Executive 17,500.00 Health Protection Agency 9,400.00 HM Revenue and Customs 25,000.00 Home Office 75,000.00 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority 9,400.00 Judicial Communications Office for England and Wales 9,400.00 Metropolitan Police Service 17,125.00 Ministry of Defence 68,700.00 Ministry of Justice 37,500.00 Office of Government Commerce 9,400.00 OFSTED 9,400.00 Partnership for Schools 9,400.00 SOCA 9,400.00 Prime Minister's Office 84,000.00 Qualifications and Curriculum Authority 9,400.00 The Wales Office 9,400.00 HMT 68,700.00 Grand Total 1,249,875.00
Ministerial Responsibility
I would define a substantial announcement as one which should be brought to the House first either via an oral or a written ministerial statement.
Public Sector: Internet
The information requested falls within the responsibility of the Central Office of Information. I have asked the chief executive to reply.
Letter from Alan Bishop, dated 13 January 2009:
As Chief Executive of the Central Office of Information (COI), I have been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question (250506) asking how many public sector websites with unique URLs are in operation in England.
Although we keep a register of all central government websites, it does not cover the wider public sector. As of end September 2008, Department Website Reviews have identified 1012 websites in operation by central government departments, executive agencies and non-departmental public bodies. This is the total number of websites identified minus the number of closed websites. Some will have multiple URLs, for example to handle misspellings or to guard against misrepresentation.
Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Bankruptcy: Cleveland
Self-employed traders may be declared bankrupt (or enter into an individual voluntary arrangement [IVA]), however, registered companies are the subject of liquidation (compulsory liquidation or creditors voluntary liquidation [CVL]).
It is not currently possible, from information held centrally in electronic format, to count the number of insolvent companies in Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland constituency.
However, the following table shows the number of self-employed bankruptcies in each month between October 2006 to December 2007.
Number 2006 October 1 November 1 December 0 2007 January 1 February 1 March 1 April 3 May 0 June 1 July 1 August 1 September 0 October 3 November 0 December 1 Notes: 1. Classifying bankrupts into administrative geographies is done using the postcode the individual provides. 2. In particular, inaccurate or missing postcodes mean that the numbers in the above table will be subject to an element of missing data. Nationally, this proportion has been decreasing from about 12 per cent. in 2000 to less than 4 per cent. in 2007. 3. Figures are not yet available for 2008. 4. Changes were made to the part of the database used to capture information on trading status and consistent data is only available from October 2006 onwards. 5. Similar information is not available for individual voluntary arrangements entered into by the self-employed.
Business
I have been asked to reply.
The Creative Economy Programme looked at these issues for all the creative industries, including designer fashion. As a result we are:
supporting the expansion of apprenticeships in the fashion industry through the Creative Economy Programme;
supporting the creation of a Couture Academy to address critical skills shortage areas;
funding the Centre for Fashion Enterprise to explore the feasibility of a hub to allow small designers to access competitively priced and high quality manufacturing.
The Government remain committed to making the UK the best place in the world to start and grow a business.
The UK business environment is recognised as among the best in the world, in particular:
The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) says UK has lowest barriers to entrepreneurship of all OECD countries.
The World Bank ranks the UK second in Europe, and puts the UK in top 10 globally (out of 181 countries) in terms of ease of doing business.
Solutions for Business, the Government’s streamlined portfolio of publicly-funded business support products and services, delivered via Business Link:
http://www.businesslink.gov.uk
provides comprehensive assistance to help companies start, grow and succeed.
Business: Wales
The European Investment Bank (EIB) publishes data and status information on individual loans on its public website (www.eib.org). The status of a loan can fall into one of three stages:
(1) under appraisal;
(2) approved by the Board of Directors of the EIB; and
(3) signed by borrower and the EIB.
Departmental Art Works
The following items on loan from the Government Art Collection are displayed in BERR Ministers’ offices:
Secretary of State, the right hon. Lord Mandelson:
Painting: Queen Elizabeth 1 (1563-1603) Reigned—Anon British artist
Painting: The Road—David Tindle
Print: Untitled Red—Lewin Bassingthwaite
Print: The Angels of Boulogne—Chris Orr
Painting: Circus Folk—David Bomberg
Minister for Employment and Postal Affairs, Pat McFadden
Painting: Snow in the Midlands—Evelyn Gibbs
Painting: Still Life with Fish—Mary Fedden
Painting: London Wall and St Giles Cripplegate—William J McLeod.
Departmental Data Protection
In line with the Government's review of data handling procedures in Government and publication of its interim and final reports, the Department will cover information assurance issues, including any data loss incidents, in its Annual Report to Parliament.
Departmental ICT
The current ICT projects being funded by Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform are as follows, with their original estimate and their current expected outturn costs:
HR Online—which is a new HR system for professional users and providing individual self-help services; estimated life-time cost £14 million up until 2012; current expected outturn cost £8 million development and £1.1 million per annum support and associated running costs.
SPIRE 3—enhancements to an existing system supporting export control; estimated life-time cost £1 million up until 2012; current expected outturn cost £897,000 development and £155,000 per annum support and associated running costs.
RITE—a system allowing remote and secure access to BERR's IT systems; estimated lifetime cost of £2.3 million up until 2012; current expected outturn cost £800,000 development and £641 per annum support and associated running costs.
Point of Single Contact—an EU directive project, funded by the EU; estimated development and implementation cost £1.6 million but with ongoing support costs still being negotiated with the supplier.
Departmental Official Hospitality
This Department does not separately itemise spending on alcohol and food.
Departmental Public Expenditure
This Department has no capital expenditure brought forward to 2008-09 or 2009-10 but the Regional Development Agencies (RDA) are bringing forward £97.6 million planned capital expenditure from 2010-11 to 2009-10 as part of the fiscal stimulus programme.
Fire Services: Working Hours
[holding answer 9 March 2009]: The UK Government recognises that losing the individual's right to opt-out of the 48-hour working week as set by the Working Time Directive, would have a detrimental effect on the hours which firefighters working the retained duty system could be available for duty, especially the substantial numbers who work full time for their primary employer. Many other workers also use this important flexibility and so and we remain firmly of the view that this right should remain. We, along with a majority of other member states are fighting for the retention of the opt-out as this dossier progresses through the European negotiation process.
I am very aware of the widespread concern on this issue amongst retained firefighters, and both from my Department and the Department for Communities and Local Government have worked very closely with the Retained Firefighters' Union and will continue to keep them informed throughout the negotiations.
Members: Correspondence
[holding answer 10 February 2009]: I responded to the hon. Member on 3 March.
[holding answer 12 February 2009]: I responded to the hon. Member on 27 February.
Redundancy
The information is provided in the following tables.
(a) The Office for National Statistics’ survey the number of people made redundant in the last three months in their quarterly Labour Force Survey. The following two tables show this information on a quarterly basis over the last five years and over the calendar year since 1997.
Quarter Number (Thousand) 2004 Q1 139 Q2 148 Q3 133 Q4 144 Total 564 2005 Q1 134 Q2 131 Q3 160 Q4 146 Total 571 2006 Q1 142 Q2 139 Q3 137 Q4 134 Total 552 2007 Q1 145 Q2 121 Q3 129 Q4 111 Total 506 2008 Q1 111 Q2 127 Q3 156 Q4 259 Total 653 Source: ONS Labour Market Statistics (BEAO)
Number (Thousand) 1997 620 1998 677 1999 712 2000 677 2001 709 2002 741 2003 630 2004 564 2005 571 2006 552 2007 506 2008 653 Source: ONS Labour Market Statistics (BEAO)
(b) and (c) no information is held on statutory redundancy payments made or the average value of payments.
Regional Development Agencies: Consultants
A copy of the report can not be placed in the Library of the House as the RDA National Secretariat is bound by the intellectual property and confidentiality clauses contained in the procurement contract with the consultant.
Regional Development Agencies: Finance
The RDAs' grant in aid and administration budgets from 1999 to 2007 is set out in the following tables. Also, the estimated 2008-09 administration budget of each RDA is given.
£ million 1999-2000 2000-01 2000-0 2000-03 2000-04 2000-05 2000-06 2000-07 2000-08 AWM 103 113 141 204 240 219 288 282 291 EEDA 30 36 55 88 80 84 130 139 134 EMDA 41 67 86 101 117 119 160 160 170 LDA — 235 266 295 317 328 397 416 386 NWDA 141 156 270 274 309 367 384 402 390 ONE 92 98 158 193 223 226 245 273 276 SEEDA 63 73 97 112 136 113 167 172 162 SWRDA 43 62 85 103 99 113 151 171 156 YF 121 125 207 211 244 288 293 313 300
£000 1999-2000 2000-01 2000-0 2000-03 2000-04 2000-05 2000-06 2000-07 2000-08 2000-09 AWM 9,200 11,884 13,023 15,616 18,199 21,050 21,311 20,535 20,992 24,491 EEDA 4,414 5,493 7,038 9,099 9,847 11,061 12,909 15,873 17,092 16,968 EMDA 8,254 8,365 8,821 11,180 12,878 13,516 15,802 16,387 17,553 18,934 LDA . 0 5,690 10,957 16,692 14,555 30,609 32,057 37,660 43,819 43,707 NWDA 10,868 13,224 16,219 43,098 58,063 30,585 25,680 38,841 34,281 38,378 ONE 16,583 15,990 16,658 18,875 22,024 22,239 23,748 24,828 24,727 28,149 SEEDA 6,817 8,533 10,469 14,591 19,274 20,138 22,340 24,339 26,146 24,109 SWRDA 9,084 8,800 9,577 15„794 17,919 17,756 20,697 23,065 24,385 26,414 YF 12,337 14,867 14,901 16,608 19,410 20,097 22,192 23,727 28,733 24,973 1 Administration budgets include salaries 2 Planned administration expenditure
The following table shows RDAs' administration spend for 2007-08.
RDA £000 AWM 20,992 EEDA 17,092 EMDA 17,553 LDA 43,819 NWDA 34,281 ONE 24,727 SEEDA 26,146 SWRDA 24,385 YF 28,733
Union Modernisation Fund
The members of the Supervisory Board are:
Sir Bill Connor (Chair)
Bruce Warman
Professor Willy Brown, CBE
Jeannie Drake, CBE
Danny Carrigan
Adrian Askew
In addition two new board members have joined this month they are:
Professor David Gordon
David Lebrecht
At the time of their appointment, the members of the Union Modernisation Fund Supervisory Board declared the following interests:
Bill Connor declared that he had spoken on behalf of a party or candidate and canvassed on behalf of a party or helped at election (for the Labour party);
Adrian Askew declared that he had held office such as Chair, Treasurer or Secretary of a local branch of a party and canvassed on behalf of a party or helped at election (for the Labour party);
William Brown declared no political activity;
Danny Carrigan declared that he had canvassed on behalf of a party or helped at election and a member of the national executive committee (for the Labour party);
Jeannie Drake declared that she had canvassed on behalf of a party or helped at election and a member of the Labour Party National Policy Forum (for the Labour party);
David Metcalfe declared that he had canvassed on behalf of a party or helped at election and undertaken any political activity which is considered relevant (for the Labour party). David Metcalfe has subsequently resigned;
Bruce Wariman declared no political activity;
Professor David Gordon declared “I am a member of the Cooperative Party which aims to foster the agenda and activities of the cooperative movement in the UK. The Cooperative party is affiliated to the Labour party and also supports the woodcraft folk which is a youth movement/club which my daughter attends;”
David Lebrecht declared no political activity.