Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 492: debated on Friday 15 May 2009

Written Answers to Questions

Friday 15 May 2009

Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform

Advantage West Midlands: Expenditure

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform how much Advantage West Midlands has disbursed in (a) revenue and (b) capital allocations in each financial year since 1998-99. (272063)

The revenue and capital expenditure of Advantage West Midlands since 1998-99 has been as follows:

£ million

Revenue

Capital

1998-991

0.4

1999-2000

57

47

2000-01

62

51

2001-02

78

62

2002-03

100

104

2003-04

117

123

2004-05

115

104

2005-06

146

142

2006-07

152

130

2007-08

141

150

2008-092

133

162

1 No split available, mainly administrative costs.

2 Latest estimate.

Community Investment Fund

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what Community Investment Fund projects each regional development agency carried out in each year since 2000. (265272)

Tables showing the Community Investment Fund projects carried out by the RDAs since 2000 will be placed in the Libraries of the House.

Departmental Databases

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (1) what categories of personal information about members of the public are contained on each relevant database managed by his Department and its agencies; on what date each category of information began to be collected; and if he will make a statement; (274174)

(2) what databases managed by his Department and its agencies hold personal information on members of the public; on what date each such database became operational; and if he will make a statement.

The Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform does not hold any protected personal information about members of the public in any of its databases.

I have asked the Chief Executives of Companies House and the Insolvency Service to respond to the hon. Member directly.

Letter from Stephen Speed, dated 15 May 2009:

The Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform has asked me to reply to you directly on behalf of The Insolvency Service on what categories of his personal information about members of the public are contained on each relevant database managed by his Department and its agencies; on what date each category of information began to be collected; and if he will make a statement.

The requested details for the databases managed by the Insolvency Service Agency are contained in the following table:

Database

Categories of Personal Information held

Date the data began to be collected

LOIS—(Official Receiver’s Case Management System)

Name, address, occupation, date and place of birth, national insurance number, for individual insolvents

April 1993 for all categories of data

Name, address, occupation, date and place of birth, national insurance number, for directors of insolvent companies

Name and address details for creditors

LOLA—(Financial administration system for Official Receiver’s cases)

Full name for individual insolvents

April 1996 for all categories of data

Name, address and (in some cases) bank account details for creditors

BANCS (Financial administration system for Insolvency Practitioner cases)

Full name for individual insolvents

October 1994 for all categories of data

Name, address and (in some cases) bank account details for creditors

Central Index—(Consolidated summary database for Official Receiver and Insolvency Practitioner cases)

Name, address, occupation, date and place of birth, national insurance number for individual insolvents

April 1994 for all categories of data

Name, address, occupation, date and place of birth, national insurance number, for directors of insolvent companies

Name, address and contact details for Insolvency Practitioners

DRO—(Debt Relief Order database)

Name, address, occupation, date and place of birth, national insurance number for individual insolvents.

April 1994 for all categories of data

Name, address, occupation, date and place of birth, national insurance number, for directors of insolvent companies

Name, address and contact details for Insolvency Practitioners

I-Solv—(Database of applicants for online bankruptcy)

Name, address, occupation, date and place of birth, national insurance number, for individual insolvents

April 2005 for all categories of data

Name, address and claim details for creditors

Name, address and details of amounts owing for debtors

CHIRPS—(Redundancy Payments Service case management system)

Name, address, occupation, date and place of birth, national insurance number, bank account details for applicants for statutory redundancy payments

November 1997 for all categories of data

EMS—(Investigations and enforcement case management system)

Name, address, and date of birth for individuals who are the subject of investigation or enforcement activities

April 2005 for all categories of data

IBIS—(Case management system of Companies Investigation Branch)

Name, address, and contact details of complainants

January 2002 for all categories of data

Name, address, date and place of birth of disqualified directors

e-IRR Online, searchable database of current individual insolvency orders)

Name, address, occupation, date of birth for individuals subject to insolvency orders

April 2004

Name, address, occupation, date of birth, date and duration of restriction, for individuals subject to a Bankruptcy Restrictions Order

June 2004

Disqualified Directors Database

Name, address, date of birth, date and duration of order, for directors subject to a disqualification order

September 2005

Finance Section Database

Name, address and bank account details for individual payees in relation to redundancy payment claims

April 2006

Name, address and bank details of job applicants (successful and unsuccessful) who were paid expenses for job interviews and tests

April 2004

Letter from Stephen Speed, dated 15 May 2009:

The Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform has asked me to reply to you directly on behalf of The Insolvency Service on what databases managed by his Department and its agencies hold personal information on individual members of the public; on what date each such database became operational; and if he will make a statement.

The requested details for the databases managed by the Insolvency Service Agency are contained in the following table:

Database

Date the database became operational

LOIS—(Official Receiver’s Case Management System)

April 1993

LOLA—(Financial administration system for Official Receiver’s cases)

April 1996

BANCS—(Financial administration system for Insolvency Practitioner cases)

October 1994

Central Index—(Consolidated summary database for Official Receiver and Insolvency Practitioner cases)

April 1994

DRO—(Debt Relief Order database)

April 2009

I-Solv—(Database of online applicants for bankruptcy)

April 2005

CHIRPS—(Redundancy Payments Service case management system)

November 1997

EMS—(Investigations and enforcement case management system)

April 2005

IBIS—(Case management system of Companies Investigation Branch)

January 2002

e-IRR (Online, searchable database of current individual insolvency orders)

April 2004

Database of Disqualified Directors

September 2005

Finance Section Database

April 2004

Letter from Gareth Jones, dated 15 May 2009:

I am replying on behalf of Companies House to your Parliamentary Question tabled on 6 May 2009, UIN 274174, to the Minister of State for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform.

Companies House is required by legislation to hold the following personal information about members of the public:

Names, addresses and dates of birth of company directors.

Names and addresses of company secretaries.

Names and addresses of company shareholders.

This information has been collected under various Companies Acts since 1844 but has only been held on an electronic database since 1986.

Letter from Gareth Jones, dated 15 May 2009:

I am replying on behalf of Companies House to your Parliamentary Question tabled on 6 May 2009, UIN 274175, to the Minister of State for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform.

The current register of companies database (known as CHIPS) became operational on 25 February 2008, superseding the previous version of the database (known as STEM), which had been operational since 1986. There is also an image database, holding electronic images of documents filed, which became operational in 1995. All these databases hold personal information, most of which is publicly available.

Departmental Written Questions

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform how many questions tabled to his Department for ordinary written answer in Session 2007-08 were (a) answered (i) in up to three days, (ii) in between four days and two weeks, (iii) in between two weeks and one month, (iv) in between one month and two months and (v) two months or more after tabling and (b) were not answered. (268661)

The information requested is not available in a format to reply without incurring disproportionate cost. This applies equally to researching the House "Parliamentary Information Management System".

However, in the three-month period from December 2008 to February 2009, the Department received a total of 566 ordinary written parliamentary questions of which 225 were answered within five sitting days. Of the 566, a total of 20 remain to be answered.

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform how many questions tabled to his Department for named day written answer in Session 2007-08 (a) received a substantive answer (i) on the day named and (ii) (A) in up to three days, (B) in between four days and two weeks, (C) in between two weeks and one month, (D) in between one and two months and (E) more than two months after the day named and (b) were not answered. (268662)

The information requested is not available in a format to reply without incurring disproportionate cost. This applies equally to researching the House "Parliamentary Information Management System".

However, in the three-month period from December 2008 to February 2009, the Department received a total of 188 named day parliamentary questions (including first order questions which could not be answered in the Chamber). Of the 188, a total of 52 were answered on the date specified. A total of five remain to be answered.

Motor Vehicles: Manufacturing Industries

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what his policy is on its payment of wage contributions to workers in the automotive industry on short-time working who are undertaking retraining in their own time. (275131)

The Government fully appreciate the difficulties that the automotive industry is experiencing during the current economic downturn.

While we are supporting a range of automotive support initiatives, we do not believe that introducing a general wage subsidy for all employers is a feasible, cost effective and sustainable option for the UK. Past experience in the UK when running a wage subsidy programme in the 1970s was that wage subsidies acted to create distortions and perverse incentives for other sectors and companies to bargain for subsidies.

We believe that the future success of British industry will be based on a highly skilled workforce, and where production is being reduced we are helping business train their workforces to ensure they emerge from the economic downturn in the best possible shape to compete in the future.

Automotive companies can access funding for training from Government and the Sector Skills Council for Science, Engineering and Manufacturing Technologies. Following demand from the automotive industry for this support, funding under the “Train To Gain” scheme for the sector has been increased substantially up to £100 million from the original budget of £65 million.

Tourism: Finance

To ask the Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform what steps his Department takes to monitor the effectiveness of spending by regional development agencies on the development of the tourism industry. (270403)

BERR and other Government Departments are involved in development of each RDA’s Regional Economic Strategy (RES) and in approving each region’s Corporate Plan. The plans are reviewed to ensure that the RDAs deliver against ministerial priorities and priorities identified in the RES.

The RDAs took on strategic responsibility for tourism development in the regions in 2003, and have developed tourism strategies and delivery structures in line with their RES. DCMS works with the RDAs in advancing and assessing progress on key strategic objectives through:

the 2012 Ministerial Advisory Group, which guides the delivery of the national tourism strategy (“Winning: A tourism strategy for 2012 and beyond”);

the Ministerial Monitoring and Implementation Group, which guides the delivery of the national skills strategy;

the Welcome to Britain Group, which is working to improve the overall visitor welcome and experience;

Partners for England, which focuses on improved resource and policy co-ordination at national, regional and local levels;

the RDA Tourism Leads group, which provides a forum for cross-regional co-operation, collaboration and leadership.

Children, Schools and Families

Class Sizes

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what estimate he has made of the average (a) infant, (b) primary and (c) secondary class sizes in the 20 local authority areas of (i) highest and (ii) lowest deprivation in the last period for which figures are available; and if he will make a statement. (262821)

Average class sizes1 as at January 2008 in England, by local authorityKey stage1,2Maintained primary3State-funded secondary3,4England25.726.220.920 Local authority areas with the highest level of deprivation5Liverpool24.324.619.2Hackney26.525.820.9Tower Hamlets27.726.321.1Manchester26.126.621.3Knowsley24.825.720.5Newham27.126.823.1Islington25.125.522.1Middlesbrough22.523.519.3Birmingham27.126.820.5Kingston Upon Hull, City of25.225.722.0Blackpool27.127.822.0Nottingham24.725.719.4Sandwell26.526.720.6Salford25.026.020.9Stoke-on-Trent26.026.521.4Blackburn with Darwen26.427.121.4Haringey27.827.519.4Lambeth27.325.920.4Leicester24.824.922.5Barking and Dagenham27.026.919.920 Local Authority Areas with the lowest level of deprivation5West Sussex26.126.621.2Kingston upon Thames28.227.120.4City of London30.024.8n/aBedfordshire24.324.521.4Hertfordshire26.626.720.0Cambridgeshire26.327.022.0Bath and North East Somerset26.026.020.2Oxfordshire24.625.620.5Leicestershire25.125.922.1Hampshire26.327.022.1Wiltshire24.925.720.7South Gloucestershire25.426.520.1Richmond upon Thames28.026.523.5Buckinghamshire25.125.620.6Bracknell Forest26.826.821.2Windsor and Maidenhead24.025.520.0West Berkshire25.025.219.1Surrey26.827.021.7Rutland25.325.223.8Wokingham24.826.319.7 n/a=. Not Applicable1 Classes taught by 1 teacher.2 Includes reception classes.3 Includes middle schools as deemed.4 Includes Academies and City Technology Colleges.5 Ranked according to the indices of multiple deprivation.Source: School Census

Education

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how much funding his Department plans to allocate to each local authority for discharging responsibilities which were formerly those of the Learning and Skills Council in each of the next five years. (275072)

I refer the hon. Member to the reply given on 5 May 2009, Official Report, columns 150-54W. This set out the number of posts we expect to transfer to each local authority from the Learning and Skills Council, subject to the passage of the Apprenticeships, Learning and Skills Bill. We are currently working with the LSC to determine how much funding will transfer to local authorities with each post from April 2010.

Education: Assessments

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what the cost to his Department of examination fees for each type of examination in maintained schools was in each of the last 10 years. (274582)

The Department began collecting information in sufficient detail to answer this question in 2002-03. No comparable data are available for previous years. The information in the table covers the combined costs of all relevant examination entry fees, including GCSEs, A/AS-levels and GNVQs, and any accreditation costs related to pupils. We do not collect separate data on each type of exam.

Financial year

Examination fees (E21)1 (£)2

2002-03

155,611,000

2003-04

173,843,000

2004-05

198,227,000

2005-06

220,056,000

2006-07

240,861,000

2007-083

265,305,000

1 Includes expenditure by local authority maintained schools in England on the costs of examination entry fees, and costs of accreditation related to pupils (the payments centres make to awarding bodies to register with them to take their qualification). This includes GCSEs, A/AS-levels and GNVQs and covers administrative costs e.g. external marking; it excludes the cost of exam resources, such as the test papers themselves.

2 Figures are rounded to the nearest £000.

3 2007-08 data remain provisional and subject to change.

Source:

http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/localauthorities/section52/subPage.cfm?action=section52.default&ID=58

(Budget Data Archive)

Education: Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what recent discussions he has had with the Secretary of State for Innovation, Universities and Skills on the merits of transferring the multi-professional education and training budget from that Department to the Higher Education Funding Council for England. (275654)

I have been asked to reply.

The Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) is the responsibility of the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills. As such it would be for this Department to discuss the transfer of this budget from the Department of Health. However, there have been no discussions on this subject in recent years.

Foster Care

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many foster parents have fostered (a) trafficked children, (b) unaccompanied asylum-seeking children and (c) children from other EU countries in each of the last three years. (275847)

Information about the numbers of foster carers who have fostered children in the three categories listed is not collected centrally.

GCE A-Level

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many pupils eligible for free school meals sat (a) mathematics and (b) further mathematics A-level in each of the last five years. (268490)

The answer is provided in the following table:

Pupils eligible for free school meals who sat mathematics and further mathematics at A-level for the period 2004-08

Number

Percentage

Maths

F-Maths

Maths

F-Maths

2004

554

31

13.8

0.8

2005

567

31

13.2

0.7

2006

591

42

14.3

1.0

2007

686

56

16.4

1.3

2008

705

53

17.1

1.3

Notes:1. The figures are based on pupils aged 16 to 18 years.

2. Percentages are based on the cohort of pupils eligible for free school meals who sat at least one GCE A-level. Source: National Pupil Database.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what estimate he has made of the number of pupils in maintained schools who gained five or more GCSEs at grade A or A* in 2006 who gained three or more A-levels at Grade A in 2008. (260540)

The most readily available analysis is given in the following table:

Number

Number of pupils who achieved 3 A grades at A-level in 2008 and

achieved 5 or more A* or A GCSE grades

13,660

did not achieve 5 or more A* or A GCSE grades

857

Prior attainment not available

147

Total

14,664

Notes:

1. Figures relate to 16 to 18-year-olds (age at start of academic year, i.e. 31 August 2007) in maintained schools (including academies and CTCs) in England. Figures relate to achievements in GCE/VCE/Applied A-level/Double Awards and full and vocational GCSEs only.

2. Not all of these pupils will have taken their GCSE examinations in 2006 or in maintained schools. Pupils who took their GCSE examinations in 2006 and achieved at least three As in their A-levels in a year other than 2008 are not included.

Source:

National Pupil Database

GCSE: Young Offender Institutions

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families pursuant to the answer of 29 April 2009, Official Report, column 1387W, on the General Certificate of Secondary Education: young offender institutions, how many young people housed in young offender institutions achieved (a) one A* to G grade, (b) five A* to G grades, (c) five A* to C grades and (d) five A* to C grades, including English and mathematics at GCSE in each year for which the Learning and Skills Council holds figures. (273426)

[holding answer 7 May 2009]: The individualised learning record (ILR) data LSC collected for 2006/07 do not allow us to answer the specific questions on the range of grades achieved. However these data show that during the 2006/07 academic year there were a total of 68 GCSE achievements by 15 to 17-year-olds in Prison Service YOIs, of which:

19 people achieved one GCSE;

Five people achieved two GCSEs;

13 people achieved three GCSEs;

The LSC’s young persons’ learning 1 (YOL1) data show that during the 2007/08 academic year, for young people under the age of 18, there were 106 GCSE achievements between grades A and C, and 159 GCSE achievements below grade C. However the data set allowing us to break this down into the number of people achieving different numbers of GCSEs (i.e. ILR) is not yet available for the 2007/08 academic year.

Also, note that the figures quoted will not include all of the GCSEs achieved by young people in juvenile custody, as some young people in custody are still registered at schools and colleges and any GCSEs that they achieve while in custody will be reflected in achievement figures of schools and colleges, rather than the figures reported by the LSC in these statistics.

Also, many young people stay in custody only for a very short time, and therefore it is not realistic for them to achieve long-term qualifications while they are in custody, especially as GCSEs can only be taken at certain points of the year.

Members: Correspondence

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families when he will reply to the letter from the hon. Member for West Worcestershire dated 27 March 2009, transferred from the Home Office on 2 April 2009, reference: M7547/9, on a nationwide database of children. (275842)

A response to the letter, from Baroness Delyth Morgan, was sent to the hon. Member on 5 May 2009.

National Curriculum Tests: Disadvantaged

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (1) how many pupils in receipt of free school meals achieved level (a) 7 and (b) 8 in Key Stage 3 examinations in (i) English, (ii) mathematics and (iii) science in (A) 1997, (B) 2002, (C) 2005 and (D) the latest year for which figures are available; (262262)

(2) how many and what percentage of pupils (a) eligible and (b) ineligible for free school meals achieved level 8 at Key Stage 3 in each of the last three years.

The requested information is not available for 1997 as prior to 2002 individual pupil characteristic information was not collected. The introduction of the Pupil Level Annual School Census (PLASC) in January 2002, which collects such information, meant that from 2002, pupil characteristic data could be matched to attainment data, allowing analyses of different groups of pupils.

The 2002 information is shown as follows:

Eligible pupilsNumber of pupils achieving KS3 level 7Number of pupils achieving KS3 level 8Percentage of pupils achieving KS3 level 8

English

Maths

Science

English

Maths

Science

English

Maths

Science

English

Maths

Science

Non FSM

496,439

497,397

497,912

56,510

91,789

55,646

5,924

21,831

4,782

1

4

1

FSM

96,741

97,299

97,488

2,663

5,120

2,126

177

542

69

0

1

0

All pupil1

598,309

600,141

600,849

59,493

97,438

58,109

6,131

22,563

4,893

1

4

1

1 Includes pupils for whom FSM information was not sought or for which information was refused

The 2005 information is shown as follows:

Eligible pupilsNumber of pupils achieving KS3 level 7Number of pupils achieving KS3 level 8Percentage of pupils achieving KS3 level 8

English

Maths

Science

English

Maths

Science

English

Maths

Science

English

Maths

Science

Non FSM

512,353

512,162

512,626

53,377

113,581

67,435

30,342

6

FSM

94,804

94,689

94,875

2,048

7,240

2,313

901

1

All pupil1

611,274

610,947

611,629

55,630

121,325

69,986

31,365

5

1 Includes pupils for whom FSM information was not sought or for which information was refused.

The 2006 information is shown as follows:

Eligible pupilsNumber of pupils achieving KS3 level 7Number of pupils achieving KS3 level 8Percentage of pupils achieving KS3 level 8

English

Maths

Science

English

Maths

Science

English

Maths

Science

English

Maths

Science

Non FSM

512,623

513,092

513,371

56,270

125,629

84,998

45,137

9

FSM

90,671

90,700

90,855

2,364

9,233

3,362

1,543

2

All pupil1

607,174

607,707

608,156

58,903

135,469

88,756

46,894

8

1 Includes pupils for whom FSM information was not sought or for which information was refused.

The 2007 information is shown as follows:

Eligible pupilsNumber of pupils achieving KS3 level 7Number of pupils achieving KS3 level 8Percentage of pupils achieving KS3 level 8

English

Maths

Science

English

Maths

Science

English

Maths

Science

English

Maths

Science

Non FSM

495,289

495,655

496,155

44,577

114,235

84,570

44,471

9

FSM

86,713

86,708

86,846

1,749

8,234

3,519

1,652

2

All pupil1

582,002

582,363

583,001

46,326

122,469

88,089

46,123

8

1 Includes pupils for whom FSM information was not sought or for which information was refused.

From 2003, level 8 can be achieved only in mathematics following the end of extension papers at KS3.

National Curriculum Assessment and GCSE/GNVQ Attainment by Pupil Characteristics, in England 2002 (final) and 2003 (provisional) can be found in SFR04/2004, at:

http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000448/index.shtml

The National Curriculum Assessments by Pupil Characteristics, GCSE and Equivalent Attainment and Post-16 Attainment by Pupil Characteristics, in England 2005 can be found in SFR09/2006, at:

http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000640/index.shtml

The National Curriculum Assessments by Pupil Characteristics, GCSE and Equivalent Attainment and Post-16 Attainment by Pupil Characteristics, in England 2005/06 (Provisional) can be found in SFR46/2006, at:

http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000693/index.shtml

The National Curriculum Assessments by Pupil Characteristics, GCSE and Equivalent Attainment and Post-16 Attainment by Pupil Characteristics, in England 2006/07 can be found in SFR38/2007, at:

http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000759/index.shtml

Physical Education: Facilities

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how much his Department spent on capital expenditure on physical educational facilities in schools in (a) 2007-08 and (b) 2008-09; and what recent estimate he has made of such capital expenditure in (i) 2009-10 and (ii) 2011-12. (275189)

The Department relies on local authorities and schools to decide how much capital should be spent on physical educational facilities, and does not maintain central records of expenditure incurred or planned during the period 2007-08 to 2010-11. No financial commitment has been made by the Department beyond 31 March 2011.

In February 2008, the Secretary of State announced a capital programme to improve facilities for PE and sport at the most needy sports colleges. £10 million was allocated to sports colleges in 2008-09 and £21.5 million in 2009-10.

Pupil Referral Units

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families pursuant to the answer of 22 April 2009, Official Report, columns 577-79W, on pupil referral units, in which local authority area each of the pupil referral units is located. (271834)

The local authority areas are shown against the pupil referral units (PRUs) and are listed as follows.

PRUs opened in 2008 by local authority

Local authority name

PRU name

Kent

Ashford and Shepway Alternative Curriculum PRU

Bradford

Bradford District PRU

Kent

Canterbury and Swale Alternative Curriculum PRU

Coventry

Chace Extended Learning Centre

Brent

Church Lane Pupil Referral Unit

Salford

Clifton and Grosvenor Centre

Kent

Dartford and Gravesham

Sunderland

Ks1 Pupil Referral Unit

Sunderland

KS2/3 PRU

Solihull

Lanchester PRU

Kent

Maidstone and Malling Alternative Curriculum PRU

Doncaster

Maple Medical PRU

Doncaster

Nexus Centre

Liverpool

Primary Centre

Wigan

Pupil Support Centre

Sunderland

School Returners/Young Mums Provision

Liverpool

Secondary Centre

Leicester

Short Course Centre

Southwark

Southwark Inclusive Learning Service KS3, KS4 and Sils+

Doncaster

Springboard Centre

Rotherham

St. Mary’s Centre

Kent

Thanet and Dover Alternative Curriculum PRU

Hampshire

The Ashwood Centre

Wigan

The Beechwood Centre

Rotherham

The Bridge

Sunderland

The Cheadle Centre

Doncaster

The Gateway Centre

Wigan

The Lilford Centre

Wigan

The Phoenix Centre

Rotherham

The Rowan Centre

Kent

Tonbridge, Tunbridge Wells and Sevenoaks Alternative Curriculum PRU

Nottingham

Unity Learning Centre

PRUs closed in 2008 by local authority

Local authority name

PRU name

Nottingham

Alternative Provision PRU

Doncaster

Beckett Road Centre

Coventry

Centre 4

Lambeth

Charles Edward Brooke Refugee Centre Co Charles Edward Brooke CofE School

Cornwall

Cornwall Hospital Education Service

Rotherham

Greasbrough Centre

Stockton-on-Tees

Greengates Primary Pupil Support Centre

Doncaster

Hexthorpe Centre

Doncaster

Hospital and Interim Tuition Service

Somerset

Link Education Centre (Orchard Lodge)

Liverpool

Mill Road Pupil Referral Unit, Ipors Centre

Wigan

Park Centre

Southwark

Southwark Inclusive Learning Service Plus (Sils+)

Wigan

Summit Centre

Sunderland

Sunderland Pupil Referral Unit

Rotherham

The Bridge

Salford

The Clifton Centre

Southwark

The Education Support Centre

Wigan

The Gerard Pupil Referral Unit

Salford

The Grosvenor Centre

Doncaster

The Long Sandall Centre

Lincolnshire

The Willows Centre Pupil Referral Unit

Leeds

Tinshill Learning Centre

Doncaster

Young Parents Centre

Milton Keynes

Young People Out of School Project

Source:

EduBase

Pupils

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what guidance his Department provides to local authorities on the likely effects on school roll projections of changes in levels of immigration. (275999)

The Department does not provide guidance to local authorities on the likely effects on school roll projections of changes in levels of immigration. This is for authorities to determine, based on their knowledge of local demographics.

Schools: Closures

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many (a) primary and (b) secondary schools he expects to close in each local authority area in each of the next three years; and if he will make a statement. (275095)

School place planning is the statutory responsibility of individual local authorities (LAs). This includes making sure there are sufficient school places, and also removing surplus places when required. To facilitate this LAs have the power to propose the closure of maintained schools.

Where LAs propose to make any changes to local school provision, including closures, they must follow a statutory process, which is then decided under established local decision making arrangements. Ministers have no direct roll in the process.

Schools: Expenditure

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what individual programmes and corresponding allocations are aggregated as other miscellaneous programmes for the year 2010-11 in the Schools section of Table 8.3 of his Department's 2008 Annual Report. (274273)

The Department's grants and programmes aggregated as within other miscellaneous programmes for 2010-11 are provided in the following table:

Departmental report allocation

Schools:

2010-11 (£ million)

Music and Dance

37

Redundancy Costs

12

TDA

593

NCSL

83

Partnership for Schools

1

Teachers TV

9

National Strategies

473

Total

1,209

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what grants and corresponding allocations are aggregated as other standards funds for the years 2007-08 and 2010-11 in the Schools section of Table 8.3 of his Department’s 2008 Annual Report. (274274)

The Department’s grants and programmes aggregated as within other standards funds for (a) 2007-08 and (b) 2010-11 are provided in the following table:

Departmental report allocation

£ million

Other standards fund

2007-08

2010-11

Schools Development Grant

1,898

2,133

Local Area Agreement Grant

166

Total

2,064

2,133

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what grants and corresponding allocations are aggregated within area based grants for the year 2010-11 in the Schools section of Table 8.3 of his Department's 2008 Annual Report. (274275)

The Department's grants and programmes aggregated as within area based grants for 2010-11 are provided in the following table:

Departmental area based grants figures

DCSF grants to local authorities

2010-11 (£ million)

Connexions

467

Extended Schools - Start Up

71

School Development Grant (LA retained element)

168

Children's Fund

132

Positive Activities for Young People

95

Care Matters

55

Secondary National Strategy: Central Co-ordination

30

Primary National Strategy: Central Co-ordination

30

Teenage Pregnancy

28

School Improvement Partners

24

Extended Rights for Free Travel

29

Children's Social Care Workforce

18

School Intervention

15

Flexible 14 to 19 Partnerships Funding

15

Secondary Behaviour and Attendance: Central Co-ordination

14

Education Health Partnerships

13

Child Death Review Processes

8

Youth Substance Misuse

7

School Travel Advisers

7

Choice Advisers

6

Youth Taskforce

4

General Duty on Sustainable Travel To School

4

Designated Teacher Funding

3

Child Trust Fund

1

Total Area Based Grants

1,242

The total in this table contains figures that have been updated since the publication of the 2008 Departmental Report.

Schools: Sports

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what his Department's definition of community use in the Building Schools for the Future programme is in relation to sports facilities. (273470)

There is no strict definition of “community use” in the Building Schools for the Future Programme. As set out in the Extended Schools prospectus, published in June 2005, the Government have encouraged all schools to offer a core set of extended services by 2010, including wider community access to sports facilities. However, it is up to individual governing bodies to decide the extent to which they do this, since they are responsible for controlling the occupation and use of school premises both during and out of school hours. Governing bodies are also best placed to define what the community is that each school serves.

Secondary schools built or upgraded under the Building Schools for the Future (BSF) programme must conform to the Department's Building Bulletin (BB) 98, "Briefing Framework for Secondary School Projects". This recommends that each school should have, as a minimum, a “four-court” sports hall designed to Sport England's specifications that cover community use. BB 98 also includes recommendations for outdoor sports pitches and games courts.

BSF investment is therefore ensuring that secondary schools will have sports facilities for use by the communities in which they are placed.

Schools: Standards

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many and what percentage of schools received a rating of inadequate in their Ofsted report for behaviour in each of the last five years. (274607)

[holding answer 11 May 2009]: This is a matter for Ofsted. HM Chief Inspector, Christine Gilbert, has written to the hon. Member and a copy of her reply has been placed in the House Libraries.

Letter from Christine Gilbert, dated 8 May 2009:

Your recent parliamentary question has been passed to me, as Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector, for reply.

The ‘inadequate’ inspection outcome was introduced in September 2005 as part of a four-point scale: outstanding, good, satisfactory, inadequate. Table A shows the outcome of the behaviour judgement for maintained schools inspected in each academic year since September 2005.

Table A: Behaviour in maintained schools inspected each year since 2005/06

Academic year

Number of school inspections which included a behaviour judgment

Number of school inspections where behaviour was judged inadequate

School inspections where behaviour was judged inadequate, as a percentage of all school inspections

2005/06

6,128

46

1

2006/07

18,264

55

1

2007/08

27,864

40

1

1 Excludes 59 school inspections using a reduced set of judgments that did not include a judgment on behaviour.

2 Excludes 2 school inspections of sixth form schools where only post-16 judgments were made. One of these inspections was judged to have good behaviour at the post-16 level, and the other had no behaviour judgment.

A copy of this reply has been sent to Rt Hon Jim Knight MP, Minister of State for Schools and Learners, and will be placed in the library of both Houses.

Schools: Transport

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what estimate he has made of the number of children who (a) cycle and (b) walk to school. (272867)

The requested information is shown in the table.

Maintained primary1, state-funded secondary1,2 and special schools3: mode of travel as at January 2008, England

Number of pupils who walk to school

Percentage of pupils who walk to school

Number of pupils who cycle to school

Percentage of pupils who cycle to school

Total number of pupils for whom mode of travel was supplied4

Number/percentage of pupils5

3,148,390

49.9

123,010

1.9

6,312,120

1 Includes middle schools as deemed. 2 Includes CTCs and academies. 3 Includes maintained and non-maintained special schools. Excludes General Hospital schools. 4 The collection of mode of travel to school data is only mandatory at pupil level for schools with an approved school travel plan. Data were received for 6,312,120 of the total number of 7,461,230 pupils. 5 Solely registered pupils. Excludes boarders. Source: School Census.

Teachers: Recruitment

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families what recent assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the Teach Next programme; and if he will make a statement. (275056)

We have more teachers in the classroom than in 1997. We have a range of routes for people who want to change career into teaching and these can be accessed direct or via transition to teaching. Most take up either postgraduate certificates in education (PGCE) or the employment-based Graduate Teacher programme.

The Becoming a Teacher evaluation (Hobson et al., 2006) found that 97 per cent. of survey respondents reported feeling ‘very’ or ‘fairly’ confident that their ITT programme had prepared them to be an effective teacher. However, a higher proportion of employment-based trainees, and a lower proportion of PGCE trainees, than those following other routes reported feeling ‘very confident’ that their ITT route had prepared them to be an effective teacher.

Teachers: Training

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many and what percentage of Graduate Teacher Programme places made available by the Training and Development Agency for Schools in 2008-09 were eligible for a salary grant. (274584)

There were 4,335 salary and training grant places allocated by the Training and Development Agency for Schools and these represent 93 per cent. of all Graduate Teacher Programme places in academic year 2008/09.

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families how many trainees have failed initial teacher training in each of the last 10 years; and if he will make a statement. (275034)

Information about trainees who did not gain Qualified Teacher Status (QTS) is only available for trainees in their final year of training. The tables show the number of final year ITT trainees for each academic year between 1998/99 and 2006/07 who did not gain QTS in their final year of training and of these the number who left their course before completion and the number where the outcome of QTS is unknown for:

1. Postgraduate ITT trainees

2. Undergraduate ITT trainees

3. Employment Based Routes (EBR) trainees

Information relating to the number of trainees through mainstream courses gaining QTS is only available from 1998/99 onwards. The same information for trainees on employment based routes was only collected from 2001/02 onwards. Figures relating to 2007/08 will be available in July 2009.

1. Postgraduate ITT trainees

Number of postgraduate final year trainees who have not gained QTS

Total number of mainstream trainees in their final year

Number of mainstream final year trainees gaining QTS

Known not to have completed course

Undefined outcome

Other outcome

Total

1998/99

17,430

15,160

1,260

130

880

2,270

1999/2000

17,170

14,850

1,250

140

940

2,320

2000/01

18,680

16,150

1,310

250

970

2,530

2001/02

19,480

16,940

1,090

0

1,450

2,540

2002/03

21,590

19,180

1,020

*

1,400

2,410

2003/04

24,590

21,460

1,430

0

1,700

3,130

2004/05

25,200

21,780

1,390

20

2,010

3,420

2005/06

25,100

21,600

1,290

10

2,210

3,500

2006/07

24,660

21,080

1,210

*

2,370

3,580

* = Less than 5.

Notes:

1. Includes trainees from Universities and other Higher Education Institutions, School Centred Initial Teacher Training and Open Universities but exclude Employment Based Routes (EBR).

2. Numbers are individually rounded to the nearest 10 and therefore may not sum.

3. ‘Other outcome’ includes final year trainees who are yet to complete their course, those with withheld QTS (including those where their skills test were not met, their standards were not met and where both their standards and skills test were not met) and those where the skills test has not been taken (including those whose standards were met and those whose standards were not met).

Source:

TDA Performance Profiles

2. Undergraduate ITT traineesNumber of undergraduate final year trainees who have not gained QTSTotal number of mainstream trainees in their final yearNumber of mainstream final year trainees gaining QTSKnown not to have completed courseUndefined outcomeOther outcomeTotal1998/999,7708,910503404708601999/20007,4906,850402103906402000/017,0406,490402402705502001/026,8706,3404004905302002/036,9806,25040*6907302003/046,3805,8805004605002004/056,1605,3602007707902005/066,1205,41020106807102006/076,6905,900400750790 * = Less than 5.Notes:1. Includes trainees from Universities and other Higher Education Institutions, School and Open Universities but exclude Employment Based Routes (EBR).2. Numbers are individually rounded to the nearest 10 and therefore may not sum.3. ‘Other outcome’ includes final year trainees who are yet to complete their course, those with withheld QTS (including those where their skills test were not met, their standards were not met and where both their standards and skills test were not met) and those where the skills test has not been taken (including those whose standards were met and those whose standards were not met).Source:TDA Performance Profiles

3. Employment Based Routes (EBR) trainees

Number of EBR final year trainees who have not gained QTS

Total number of mainstream trainees in their final year

Number of mainstream final year trainees gaining QTS

Known not to have completed course

Undefined outcome

Other outcome

Total

2001/02

2,440

2,210

30

0

190

230

2002/03

4,030

3,670

340

0

20

360

2003/04

4,950

4,470

440

0

30

470

2004/05

7,220

6,600

260

0

350

610

2005/06

6,970

6,090

420

0

450

870

2006/07

7,840

7,120

350

0

380

720

Notes:

1. Includes trainees through Employment Based Routes (EBR) only.

2. Numbers are individually rounded to the nearest 10 and therefore may not sum.

3. ‘Other outcome’ includes final year trainees who are yet to complete their course, those with withheld QTS (including those where their skills test were not met, their standards were not met and where both their standards and skills test were not met) and those where the skills test has not been taken (including those whose standards were met and those whose standards were not met).

Source:

TDA Performance Profiles

Communities and Local Government

British Humanist Association

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what meetings Ministers in her Department have had with the British Humanist Association in the last 36 months. (274781)

I met the British Humanist Association on 10 February 2009 to discuss a range of issues. My predecessor, the hon. Member for Gloucester (Mr. Dhanda), met the organisation on 12 November 2007.

Commission for Local Administration in England

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the cost to her Department of the Office of the local government ombudsman has been in each of the last five years. (274779)

The amount of grant paid by this Department to the local government ombudsman from 2004-05 to 2008-09 is set out in the Local Government Finance Report and is as follows:

£

2004-05

11,058,000

2005-06

11,522,400

2006-07

13,221,000

2007-08

12,851,000

2008-09

12,600,000

For 2009-10 we have made provision in the Main Estimates of £16,155,000 for grants to the local government ombudsman, including a provision for possible future redundancies and a provision to fund the additional remit the ombudsman will have for schools and health matters, if and when the relevant provisions in the Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Bill and Health Bill currently before Parliament are enacted and come into force.

Council Tax

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what was the (a) percentage and (b) cash rise in (i) average B and D council tax in England and (ii) average council tax per dwelling in England in (A) absolute and (B) real terms in each year since 1997-98. (274768)

Information on the change in both percentage and cash terms in the average band D council tax in England and the average council tax per dwelling in England in both absolute and real terms in each year since 1997-98 is shown in the tables.

Absolute changeReal terms change1

£

Percentage

£

Percentage

Band D, two adults for area

1997-982

42

6.5

36

4.0

1998-992

59

8.6

41

4.4

1999-2000

51

6.8

51

5.1

2000-01

49

6.1

32

3.1

2001-02

54

6.4

48

4.5

2002-03

75

8.2

75

6.7

2003-04

126

12.9

112

9.5

2004-052

65

5.9

43

3.3

2005-062

47

4.1

11

0.8

2006-07

54

4.5

25

1.9

2007-08

53

4.2

-4

-0.3

2008-092

52

3.9

-4

-0.3

2009-10

41

3.0

Average dwelling

1997-982

39

7.4

36

4.9

1998-992

50

8.9

36

4.6

1999-2000

42

6.8

42

5.2

2000-01

41

6.3

27

3.2

2001-02

44

6.3

39

4.5

2002-03

63

8.5

63

6.9

2003-04

104

12.9

93

9.5

2004-052

59

6.5

42

3.9

2005-062

42

4.3

12

1.1

2006-07

47

4.7

23

2.0

2007-08

45

4.3

-2

-0.2

2008-092

44

4.0

-2

-0.2

2009-10

30

2.6

1 Adjusted using the all items retail prices index (RPI) as at April each year and based on April 2008 prices.

2 Amounts shown are after the designation of authorities requiring them to recalculate their budget requirement and council tax.

Source:

BR1, BR2, BR3 and CTB returns

The real terms change data for 2009-10 will not be available until after the publication of the April RPI figure on 19 May 2009.

Amounts shown are calculated on headline taxes and before benefits. Where indicated the figures are calculated after the designation of authorities that required them to recalculate their budget requirement and council tax.

The data are taken from the annual council tax base forms completed by all billing authorities in England and the Budget requirement forms completed by all billing and precepting authorities in England.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government if she will make an assessment of the (a) feasibility and (b) likely effect on the economy of replacing council tax with a local income tax. (275818)

No. The Government agree with Sir Michael Lyons’s conclusion, following his inquiry into local government, that council tax is broadly sound and should be retained. In his report Sir Michael concluded that a local income tax would result in a “significant rebalancing of the tax burden”.

Council Tax: Valuation

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the answer of 13 March 2009, Official Report, column 765W, on council tax: valuation, when she plans to place in the Library a copy of the information referred to in the answer. (274706)

Departmental ICT

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much her Department has spent on the maintenance of its IT equipment in the last 12 months. (272875)

Communities and Local Government has outsourced its corporate IT service to Steria Limited and costs of maintaining IT equipment are absorbed into the annual cost of the service. The service cost for financial year April 2008 to March 2009 for that service was £4.5 million. Information on the cost of maintenance of other IT systems in the Department is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what steps she has taken to reduce the level of carbon dioxide emissions arising from the operation of ICT systems in her Department under the Greening Government ICT Strategy. (273552)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave on 6 May 2009, Official Report, column 234W to the hon. Member for Cardiff, Central (Jenny Willott).

Departmental Mobile Phones

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many (a) BlackBerry devices and (b) mobile telephones have been lost by (i) Ministers, (ii) special advisers and (iii) civil servants in her Department and its predecessor in each year since 2005. (274461)

There have been no BlackBerry devices or mobile telephones reported as lost by Ministers, or special advisers in Communities and Local Government, which was created in May 2006 or its predecessor, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, in any of the years since 2005.

However, one mobile phone was reported as lost by a civil servant in Communities and Local Government in the year 2008-09.

This answer does not include Government offices for the regions who carry out functions on behalf of 10 Government Departments.

Departmental Publications

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what timetable her Department has set for the publication of its evidence and innovation strategy. (272342)

The Department for Communities and Local Government intends to publish an evidence and innovation strategy in late 2009.

Departmental Stationery

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much her Department has spent on branded stationery and gifts for (a) internal and (b) external promotional use in each of the last five years. (273777)

Communities and Local Government Department was established in May 2006. Since that time the Department has spent the following on branded stationery:

Amount spent plus VAT

2006-07

18,642.50

2007-08

11,005.50

2008-09

7,198.65

For information relating to the amount spent on promotional materials for the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister between 2002 and the abolition of the Department in 2006, I refer the hon. Member to the answer given on 25 October 2006, Official Report, column 1934W.

Since the establishment of the Department for Communities and Local Government the costs of gifts for internal and external promotion are not held centrally and can be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Housing: Low Incomes

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (1) what estimate she has made of the administrative cost to the public purse of the operation of the right to buy scheme in each year since 1997; (274844)

(2) what her Department's policy on the charging by local authorities of right to buy administrative costs to their housing revenue accounts is; and if she will make a statement.

A local authority is permitted to fund its administrative costs incidental to and of a right to buy (RTB) disposal from the receipt arising from that disposal.

A local authority's other administrative costs relating to RTB are required to be charged to its housing revenue account.

Local Government

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what role her Department will have in oversight of the Local Authority Leaders’ Forums. (274818)

The Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill provides for the Government to establish and fund the activities of the Local Authority Leaders’ Boards in relation to work on the preparation, drafting and implementation of the Regional Strategy.

The Department will be responsible for agreeing the scheme under which the Leaders’ Board in each region will be established and also for ensuring that value for money is obtained through agreement of business plans.

Local Government Finance

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government with reference to the answer of 29 October 2007, Official Report, columns 667-68W, on local authorities: grants, what the grant per capita to each local authority was in (a) 2008-09 and (b) 2009-10; and what the average grant per capita to (i) district councils, (ii) unitary councils, (iii) county councils, (iv) metropolitan councils and (v) London boroughs was in (A) 2008-09 and (B) 2009-10. (274714)

1 refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for Bromley and Chislehurst (Robert Neill) on 19 January 2009, Official Report, column 1074W.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government which shire counties do not levy a separate fire precept. (274769)

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much debt each local authority had in the most recent year for which figures are available. (274786)

I have today placed in the Library of the House, a table containing details of the gross debt that each local authority in England had at 31 March 2008.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government for how long local authorities retain revenue raised through reductions in council tax discounts on (a) empty and (b) second homes before equalisation processes in the calculation of Government grants are applied. (274790)

The distribution of formula grant to local authorities in England takes account of the socio-economic and demographic characteristics of the authority, together with its relative ability to raise council tax, expressed in terms of the council tax base. We then ensure that every authority receives at least a minimum percentage increase (the ‘floor’) year-on-year on a like-for-like basis. In order to pay for the cost of the floor, we scale back the increase in grant above the floor for other authorities.

Since the introduction of multi-year settlements, we have used projected tax base data in the calculation of formula grant. The starting point for the tax base projections used in the current three-year settlement, covering 2008-09 to 2010-11, is the tax base as at 8 October 2007 adjusted for student exemptions. This is then increased annually by the Secretary of State’s estimate of the average annual increase in the tax base for the authority between 10 October 2005 and 8 October 2007.

The actual discount applied to long-term empty homes is applied for all authorities in calculating the tax base for the purposes of distributing formula grant. Any reduction in the discount applied to long-term empty homes commencing after 8 October 2007, will not be reflected in the projected taxbase calculations until the 2011-12 settlement.

Since 1 April 2004, although billing authorities have been able to reduce the council tax discount for second homes in their area (to between 10 and 50 per cent.), a discount of 50 per cent. has continued to be assumed for all authorities in calculating the tax base for the purposes of distributing formula grant.

Local Government: Public Consultation

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the reasons are for the time taken to publish the outcomes of the Place Survey. (274912)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave her on 7 May 2009, Official Report, column 396W.

Local Government: Reorganisation

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what estimate she has made of the effect on her Department's expenditure in 2009-10 of local government restructuring. (274744)

The Department's running cost budget for 2009-10 includes provision of £1.57 million for work on local governance, including work on any reorganisations of local authorities. As required by the affordability criterion for the unitary bids, implementing the unitary proposals is self-financing, and the savings generated by the new unitary councils are available to be invested in front-line services or to reduce the pressure on council tax; hence, implementing a unitary council has no additional impact on departmental expenditure.

Local Government: Standards

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what recent steps her Department has taken to monitor the performance of local authorities. (275412)

The final results from the Comprehensive Performance Assessment (CPA) were published by the Audit Commission in March 2009. These showed the highest ever number of top-performing councils, with more than ever before assessed as ‘improving strongly’.

On 1 April we introduced the new system for assessment and inspection of local outcomes, Comprehensive Area Assessment (CAA), as part of the new local performance framework. CAA builds and improves on CPA, covering outcomes delivered by local authorities acting alone or in partnership, and is carried out jointly by six local public service inspectorates. The first CAA reports will be published in November 2009. For each local area the reports will comprise an area assessment—which looks at how well local public services are delivering local priorities and how likely they are to improve in the future—and organisational assessments of individual local public bodies, including local authorities.

Ahead of CAA, following sign-off of the new Local Area Agreements (LAAs) in June 2008, a review of local areas’ initial efforts to prepare for LAA delivery was carried out by the Government Offices earlier this year. The review indicated that local authorities and their partners were progressing well with their LAAs, with the vast majority of areas strengthening partnership and delivery arrangements to enhance their ability to meet improvement targets.

Where performance issues are not being addressed sufficiently quickly or effectively in local areas, Government Offices will work with local partners and central Government to provide challenge, broker appropriate action, and monitor improvement. This may range from additional support from the local government sector, to consultancy support, inspection, or ultimately formal intervention action.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government when she plans to publish a summary of the responses to the consultation on Changing Council Governance Arrangements. (275544)

As we indicated in our consultation document on Changing Council Governance Arrangements, we will produce a summary of responses within three months of the close of the consultation— 13 March 2009. This will be published on the Department’s website.

Non-Domestic Rates

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what estimate her Department has made of the average (a) business rate bill and (b) aggregate business rate revenue at (i) the end of transitional relief period in 2009-10 and (ii) the point at which the 5 per cent. rise in the multiplier will be applied in 2009-10. (274750)

No information is held centrally on individual businesses' bills; therefore the average change in business rates bills cannot be calculated.

The reduction in rate yield due to full rate increases being deferred for 2008-09 was £106 million. The net change in yield as a result of transitional relief in 2008-09 was £69.4 million. Data for 2009-10 are not yet available.

In 2009-10 businesses will be able to defer a proportion of their business rates bill increase. Following is a link to an announcement of the Government's plans for deferral, which includes an estimate of the cost of the proposal:

http://www.communities.gov.uk/news/localgovernment/1191049

This estimate will be updated in the impact assessment that will be undertaken and published as part of the process of making the necessary secondary legislation.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many hereditaments in each Government office region have a rateable value of less than £10,000. (274752)

The numbers of hereditaments with a rateable value of less than £10,000, by Government office region, are shown in the following table.

Hereditaments with a rateable value of less than £10,000

Number

North East

51,304

North West

158,285

Yorkshire and the Humber

116,216

East Midlands

87,298

West Midlands

117,324

East of England

110,438

London

138,639

South East

140,899

South West

127,573

Total England

1,047,976

The data are as at 31 March 2009 and are from the Valuation Office Agency.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the gross cost before the application of downward phasing was of providing transitional relief in respect of business rate revaluation in England in each year from 2005-06. (274753)

The reduction in rate yield on the local list due to full rate increases being deferred for each year from 2005-06 is shown in the table:

Gross cost (£ million)

2005-061

1,167

2006-071

501

2007-081

230

2008-092

106

1 Data from NNDR 3: National Non-Domestic Rate Collection Yield Outturn returns

2 Data from NNDR 1: National Non-Domestic Rate Collection Yield Forecast returns

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government if she will make it her policy to (a) undertake and (b) publish a (i) small firms and (ii) privacy impact assessment in respect of the 2010 business rate revaluation. (274909)

The 2010 business rates revaluation takes effect from 1 April 2010. We will publish a draft impact assessment alongside our proposals for transitional arrangements to phase in changes in rate bills as a result of the revaluation later in the summer.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government by what date businesses must apply in order to be eligible for the deferral of 2009-10 business rate increases. (274910)

The Government are currently considering the further detail and administrative arrangements for the business rates deferral scheme, working collaboratively with the local government sector and business to ensure ease of implementation.

The regulations authorising the scheme are planned to come into effect this summer and will set out in detail the application process and timetable. Businesses will be contacted by their billing authority and invited to apply for the scheme shortly after the regulations come into effect.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government with reference to the answer to the hon. Member for Bromley and Chislehurst (Robert Neill) of 5 June 2008, Official Report, columns 1067-68W, on non-domestic rates, what estimate her Department has made of the maximum revenue that would be raised in England from supplementary business rates based on (a) 2009 rateable values and (b) 2010 rateable values post-revaluation calculated on the same basis as the estimates provided for maximum revenue based on 2007 rateable values in Table 3.4 of Business Rate Supplements: A White Paper. (274935)

The Department has not made any further calculations of possible future revenues from supplementary business rates beyond those based on 2007 rateable values and published in Table 3.4 of Business Rate Supplements: A White Paper.

Rented Housing

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government if she will end the target rent scheme in 2009-10. (275838)

No. Future rents policy is tied in with work currently being undertaken as part of the Review of Council Housing Finance.

Shops: Valuation

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government if she will place in the Library a copy of the most recent edition of the Valuation Office Agency's zoning of shops valuation handbook. (274911)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to the hon. Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Mr. Pickles) on 8 January 2008, Official Report, column 510W.

Culture, Media and Sport

Government Art Collection

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport how many items from the Government Art Collection are in (a) departmental offices, (b) ministerial residences, (c) offices of non-departmental public bodies, (d) public galleries, (e) embassies overseas, (f) storage and (g) elsewhere. (271210)

[holding answer 27 April 2009]: The Government Art Collection comprises some 13,700 works of art. Its main purpose is to promote Britain by the acquisition and display of works of art (mostly by British artists) in the representational areas of major British Government buildings in the UK and abroad, where they are seen by thousands of visitors every year. At any one time some 70 per cent. of the collection is out on display, and the figures given here change on a daily basis.

The latest figures available are:

(a) 2,043 Government Art Collection (GAC) works of art in departmental offices.

(b) 560 in ministerial residences (including the whole of 10 and 11 Downing Street).

(c) 187 in offices of non-departmental public bodies and similar.

(d) 69 on loan to public galleries (including loans to temporary exhibitions).

(e) 5,404 in embassies overseas.

(f) 4,535 currently at the GAC's premises and available for selection and display; 470 of these were earmarked for specific locations (i.e. selected and awaiting installation). Of the rest, three were in commercial storage and 23 were being conserved and/or reframed.

(g) 912 displayed elsewhere (i.e. to organisations which do not fall into the categories a-f, such as in London: Lancaster House, Marlborough House and the Somerset House Trust; and abroad: the Offices of the Council of Europe in Paris and the European Commission Offices in Brussels).

Performing Arts: Discrimination

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what recent discussions he has had with representatives of the performing arts on age discrimination in respect of performers in theatre, film, radio and television; and if he will make a statement. (274810)

I have had no recent discussions of this nature. DCMS is committed to promoting equality of opportunity and we encourage our sectors to make the most of the full range of talent available to them.

Duchy of Lancaster

10 Downing Street: E-mail

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster what his policy is on the use of web-based e-mail accounts on computers in 10 Downing Street. (275112)

The Prime Minister’s Office is an integral part of Cabinet Office and therefore follows its guidelines and policies in the use of ICT. The policy for the current Cabinet Office systems does not allow for any web- based e-mail accounts. Web-based e-mail accounts are permitted on a new pilot system, due to the increased security measures we are able to apply. If the system is rolled out, the Cabinet Office will reconsider its policy on web-based e-mails.

Census: Finance

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster what budget has been allocated to the generation of outputs from the 2011 Census. (274196)

The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.

Letter from Karen Dunnell, dated May 2009:

As National Statistician I have been asked to reply to your recent question asking what budget has been allocated to the generation of outputs from the 2011 Census. (274196)

The purpose of conducting a Census is to generate statistics and over the period 2005-2016 the budget for the Census as a whole is £482 million. Provision of £450 million for the cost of the Census has been made up to the period 2011-12. Of this £450 million, £7.5 million has been allocated to the early development of Census outputs. Provision for later years from 2012/13 will be subject to future spending reviews and will cover the final stages of data and output processing, preparing, publishing and disseminating outputs, and a number of subsequent output services and releases. This is set out in paragraphs 1.28 and 1.29 of the 2011 Census White Paper ‘Helping to shape tomorrow’ which was published in December 2008. A copy was placed in the House of Commons library and is also available on the website at

http://www.ons.gov.uk/census/2011-census/2011-census-project/legislation/index.html

Final decisions have not yet been made about how the statistics are disseminated. We are at present conducting consultation with census users on their requirements for types of statistics and area levels and the ways in which they will be made available.

Civil Servants: Pensions

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster how many and what proportion of former civil servants have had their pension payments (a) reduced and (b) increased in the last 12 months; and for what reason in each case. (270080)

In April each year the pensions, payable from the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme, of all former civil servants and their dependants are increased in line with inflation in accordance with the provisions of the Pensions Increase Act 1971 and Social Security Pensions Act 1975.

The Civil Service Pension Scheme is a statutory scheme and pensions are accordingly corrected when an under or overpayment is identified. I refer the hon. Member to the written statement I gave to the House on 16 December 2008.

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster what the administration costs of the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme were in each of the last 10 years. (272639)

Central management costs of the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme are met by appropriations in aid of the Cabinet Office from the accruing superannuation liability charges paid by employers. For financial years from 2001-02, these amounts are shown by way of note to the resource accounts for Cabinet Office: Civil Superannuation. The central administration costs for earlier years are:

£ million

2000-01

14.4

1999-2000

13.6

1998-99

13.5

Day-to-day administration costs are met by individual employers and details are not held centrally.

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster how many early retirements among members of the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme there were in the last five years for which figures are available. (272640)

Figures are held centrally only in respect of early retirements on the grounds of ill-health. From 2006-07 these numbers are included in the resource accounts for Cabinet Office: Civil Superannuation. Copies of the resource accounts can be found in the Library and on the civil service pensions website at

www.civilservice.gov.uk/pensions

Figures for the earlier years are as follows:

Financial year

Ill-health retirement applications approved

2003-04

1,343

2004-05

1,209

2005-06

1,135

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster what guidance the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme has issued to employing departments on enhancements of civil service pension entitlements for scheme members who (a) are made redundant, (b) take early retirement other than on grounds of ill health and (c) take early retirement on grounds of ill health. (272642)

On redundancies and early retirements other than those on the grounds of ill-health, I refer the hon. Member to the answer given in the other place to the noble Lord, Lord Laird, on 3 March 2009, Official Report, House of Lords, columns WA 134-35.

The terms payable in respect of early retirements on the grounds of ill-health are set out in the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme, a statutory scheme made under the Superannuation Act 1972. The rules of the scheme can be found on the Civil Service Pensions website at:

www.civilservice.gov.uk/pensions

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster what the cost of pension payments made to civil servants who have taken early retirement between the date of their retirement and the date they reached the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme normal retirement age was in each of the last five years. (272644)

Employing Departments are responsible for meeting the full costs of early retirements of civil servants other than those on the grounds of ill-health. The annual cost of pension payments made before the scheme’s pension age in respect of such early retirements is contained in Cabinet Office: Civil Superannuation Resource Accounts (in the note to the accounts entitled “Revenue account—CSCS compensation agency arrangements”). Copies of the resource accounts can be found in the Library and on the civil service pensions website at:

www.civilservice.gov.uk/pensions

The annual cost of pension payments made before the scheme’s pension age in respect of early retirements on the grounds of ill-health is not recorded separately. However, each year, the resource accounts of each employing department give details of the total additional annual pension granted to any of their employees who retired on the grounds of ill-health during that year.

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster how many retired civil servants receive a civil service pension of between (a) £2,000 and £3,000, (b) £3,000 and £4,000 and (c) £4,000 and £5,000 per annum. (274169)

[holding answer 11 May 2009]: As at 7 May 2009 the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme is paying 52,741 pensioners a gross pension between £2000 and £3000; 46,257 pensioners a pension between £3,000 and £4,000, and 37,644 pensioners a pension between £4,000 and £5,000 per annum. "Pensioners" includes retired officers but not those in receipt of a dependant's pension.

Civil Servants: Redundancy

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster what his policy is on the size of redundancy payments for civil servants; and if he will make a statement. (272643)

I refer the hon. Member to the statement made by the Prime Minister on 31 March 2009, Official Report, column 60-61WS.

Civil Service

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster what the mechanisms are for reviewing the content of the Civil Service Code; and if he will make a statement. (274617)

The Civil Service Code is kept under review and is updated as and when required.

Copies of the Civil Service Code are available in the Library of the House and available at

http://www.civilservice.gov.uk/Assets/cs_code_tcm6-2444.pdf

Departmental Contracts for Services

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster which services his Department has outsourced in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement. (274454)

Information regarding contracts for the provision of estates management and corporately provided information and communications technology (ICT) which have been outsourced over the past five years, and the year that they were outsourced, are as follows:

Telephone service management (2007);

Security guarding services, not previously outsourced (2007).

Centrally held records do not show any other services being outsourced over that period.

Departmental Correspondence

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster what procedure his Department follows for dealing with complaints received (a) by e-mail, (b) by post, (c) by telephone and (d) via his Department's website. (274531)

The complaints handling procedure for the Cabinet Office is available on the Cabinet Office website at:

http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/ContactUs/Complaints.aspx

A copy has been placed in the Library of the House.

Departmental ICT

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster what the average server capacity utilisation by each division of his Department was in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement. (269578)

The majority of servers used by my Department are supplied under our current ICT contract by Fujitsu services. The Cabinet Office possesses fileserver storage used mainly for the storage of documents and databases. The amount used over the past four years is as follows:

December

2005

2006

2007

2008

Data Size (GB)

2,481

3,814

4,700

5,400

Utilisation (percentage)

30

46

57

65

We have no information about the server capacity utilisation in 2004.

The Department also has a small number of servers used for the operation of its e-mail system. The volatile nature of the e-mail traffic and the need to keep real-time backups, mean that these servers provide optimum performance at less than 20 per cent. capacity.

The Department has recently instituted a policy of moving to storage area networking (SAN) devices. These allow several applications to share a server and so make much more efficient use of its capacity. Our current SAN has a utilisation rate of 80 per cent.

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster how many (a) printers and (b) multi-function devices with printing functions were in use in each division of his Department in each of the last five years; how many such devices had a function enabling two-sided printing; and if he will make a statement. (269601)

On 17 July 2008, I launched the Greening Government ICT Strategy. Its aim is to reduce the environmental impact of the computer systems employed by all Government bodies. In the strategy, one important target is to reduce the overall number of printers used by an organisation and replace them with multi-function devices (MFDs) where security issues allow. The MFDs should use green printing defaults wherever possible.

The Department has used the following number of multi-function devices with printing functions and printers during the past five years.

December

MFDs

Printers

2008

147

164

2007

167

161

2006

156

150

2005

149

133

2004

128

127

All multi-functional devices are capable of two-sided printing, and indeed are set up to do so as the default.

Since 2003, my Department has had a policy of installing multi-user MFDs as the main device for printing. A number of printers have been retained, but they are only used where there are specific business reasons.

Departmental Mobile Phones

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster how many (a) BlackBerrys and (b) other mobile telephones have been provided to (i) Ministers, (ii) special advisers and (iii) civil servants in (A) the Cabinet Office and (B) the Prime Minister's Office in each year since 2005. (268282)

The number of mobile phones purchased by the Cabinet Office in each year since 2005 are shown as follows:

Number

2005

219

2006

242

2007

226

2008

235

At April 2009 the Cabinet Office has 198 BlackBerrys in use. Records of when these were purchased are not held centrally so the information requested can be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Our records do not differentiate between mobile devices supplied to Ministers, special advisers and civil servants.

The Prime Minister’s Office is an integral part of the Cabinet Office.

Departmental Official Hospitality

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster how much his Department has spent on (a) conference services and (b) banqueting services in each of the last five years. (274512)

Information relating to spend on conference and banqueting services is not held centrally and therefore is available only at disproportionate cost.

Departmental Safety

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster how much his Department spent on compliance with requirements of health and safety at work legislation in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement. (274549)

Information relating to spend on health and safety for each of the last five years is not held centrally and therefore is available only at disproportionate cost.

Government Departments: Data Protection

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster if he will discuss with the Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform the implications for handling sensitive data of the overseas ownership of suppliers of services to BT under its contract for handling sensitive Government IT systems. (272398)

All communications services providers supplying services to Government must comply with the appropriate security standards as determined by Government Departments in their information risk management and protective security policies.

Regular discussions take place between Ministers and officials across government as appropriate to address information security and assurance requirements and policies for Government.

Government Departments: Press Releases

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster whether the (a) issue and (b) content of departmental press releases is subject to a code of conduct. (273263)

All Government communications activity is subject to strict propriety guidance, which, along with the Civil Service Code, defines how civil servants can properly and effectively present Government policies and programmes.

Copies of the communication propriety guidance have been placed in the Library of the House, copies of the Civil Service Code are available in the Library of the House and can be found at:

http://www.civilservice.gov.uk/Assets/cs_code_tcm6-2444.pdf

Local Government: Standards

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster who monitors the performance of local authorities under the (a) Customer Service Excellence and (b) Charter Mark schemes. (273254)

Cabinet Office is the owner of the customer service excellence and charter mark schemes. Cabinet Office licenses four independent certification bodies to provide assessment processes for customer service excellence and charter mark. The certification bodies are the sole decision makers in the process of certifying organisations as CSE or charter mark holders. They manage all matters relating to the ongoing suitability and status of holders in local government and other sectors.

Ministers: Costs

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster if he will estimate the average annual cost to each Department of (a) a Secretary of State, (b) a Minister of State and (c) a Parliamentary Under-Secretary in the last 12 months. (273142)

[holding answer 7 May 2009]: Instruction on the reporting of the remuneration of Government Ministers is set out by HM Treasury in the Government Financial Reporting Manual (FReM). Under this guidance, information on ministerial salaries is provided in the remuneration section of Departments' annual Resource Accounts, copies of which are in the Library of the House.

Ministers: Data Protection

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster how many security breaches involving confidential documents left (a) on public transport and (b) elsewhere involved (i) Cabinet Ministers and (ii) advisers to Cabinet Ministers in each of the last three years. (271007)

It is for individual Departments to collate information on security breaches within their Departments.

Pensions

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster how much revenue he expects to accrue to the Exchequer from the application of the correct pension increases for pensioners in the five schemes affected by the incorrect indexation of the guaranteed minimum pension in the next 12 months. (271528)

Pensions and other benefits paid from the pension schemes concerned are accounted for in the annual Resource Accounts for the schemes. Resource Accounts for the year 2009-10 will be published following the end of the year in question.

Strategy Committee

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster what the reasons were for the formation of the Cabinet Office's Strategy Committee; when it was established; on whose authority the committee was established; what its objectives are; who its members are; how often it has met; and if he will make a statement. (274183)

Electoral Commission Committee

Electoral Register

To ask the hon. Member for Gosport, representing the Speaker's Committee on the Electoral Commission what estimate the Electoral Commission has made of the proportion of unregistered voters who are functionally illiterate. (275408)

The Commission informs me that it has made no estimate of the proportion of unregistered voters who are functionally illiterate.

However, the Commission’s 2005 report, “Understanding electoral registration”, found a correlation between under-registration and those with no educational qualifications. This correlation is more pronounced for the younger age groups, with non-registration approximately 8 per cent. among 18 to 34-year-olds who hold some form of educational qualification and 15 per cent. for those reporting no qualifications.

To ask the hon. Member for Gosport, representing the Speaker's Committee on the Electoral Commission what steps the Electoral Commission is taking to assist functionally illiterate people to register to vote. (275409)

The Commission informs me that it issues guidance to electoral registration officers (EROs) on providing assistance to people with low levels of literacy, and that it includes as part of its performance standards framework a requirement that EROs ensure that the registration process is straightforward and accessible for electors.

The Commission provides materials to help EROs and community groups to communicate with people with literacy or learning difficulties, and also funds, through its partnership grants programme, projects to increase registration among people with learning disabilities.

Local Government: Suffolk

To ask the hon. Member for Gosport, representing the Speaker's Committee on the Electoral Commission for what reasons the Boundary Committee for England did not select the East Suffolk/West Suffolk/Ipswich pattern as a formal option for consultation in its structural review of Suffolk local government. (275212)

The Electoral Commission informs me that the Boundary Committee considered that an East Suffolk/West Suffolk/Ipswich pattern would, on the basis of the information before it, be unlikely to have the capacity to deliver the outcomes specified by the Secretary of State's five criteria.

To ask the hon. Member for Gosport, representing the Speaker's Committee on the Electoral Commission for what reasons the Boundary Committee for England's March 2009 consultation on preferred patterns for the future of local government in Suffolk proposed an additional public service village in Stowmarket in the rural authority in the pattern B option; and for what reasons such a village was not proposed in the pattern A option. (275220)

The Electoral Commission informs me that in its further draft proposal report the Boundary Committee outlined potential arrangements to deliver the outcomes specified by the Secretary of State's five criteria.

One of these arrangements is for a pattern of “service delivery villages”. These are centres typically providing shared local offices for public sector service providers, intended to encourage shared solutions to local problems. In pattern A, which is a unitary county authority, the committee proposed locating the public service villages in the three largest towns: Ipswich, Bury St. Edmunds and Lowestoft. In pattern B, the committee requested views on whether the town of Stowmarket would be an appropriate location for a public service village, serving residents living in the centre of Suffolk, bearing in mind that Ipswich would be included in a separate unitary authority.

To ask the hon. Member for Gosport, representing the Speaker's Committee on the Electoral Commission whether the Boundary Committee for England has determined Lowestoft to be (a) an urban area and (b) a market town. (275239)

The Electoral Commission informs me that its Boundary Committee has not determined Lowestoft to be either an urban area or a market town for the purposes of its further draft proposals for unitary local government in Suffolk. It is not the committee's remit to decide how an area should be defined.

Energy and Climate Change

British Nuclear Fuels

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what the (a) final severance package and (b) pension arrangements were for the previous chief executive of British Nuclear Fuels plc. (267063)

I have been asked to reply.

In line with the company's standard terms of employment, the outgoing chief executive of BNFL, Mike Parker CBE, is entitled to a redundancy payment equivalent to one times his basic salary. There are no other severance related payments due to him. There are no BNFL pension arrangements for Mike Parker; he does not participate in the BNFL pension scheme and the company has not made contributions to any other pension scheme on his behalf.

Government Departments: Carbon Emissions

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what mechanism exists for the co-ordination of measures to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from Government Departments' data centres. (274899)

I have been asked to reply.

The Government Chief Information Officer Council is co-ordinating measures to implement the Greening Government ICT Strategy published last July. The strategy includes early actions to increase the average server capacity utilisation, which will reduce the overall level of carbon dioxide emissions in data centres and accord with the European Code of Conduct. The CIO Council are also working with the Public Sector Council of Intellect, the trade association for the high technology industries, on a forward strategy for Government data centres to reduce costs and carbon emissions.

Winter Fuel Payments

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change if he will estimate the cost to the public purse of extending eligibility for the £200 annual winter fuel payment to all people with spinal cord injuries. (272348)

I have been asked to reply.

The information requested is not available.

Winter fuel payments are made to people aged 60 or over, including those who are disabled. We do not collect statistics on the number of people aged below 60 with spinal cord injuries.

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Flood Control

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) how many times the National Resilience Forum on Flooding has met since it was established; and if he will make a statement; (269967)

(2) what the membership of the National Resilience Forum on Flooding is; and if he will make a statement.

I have been asked to reply.

The National Resilience Forum has not yet met. In December, in the Government’s reply to Sir Michael Pitt’s Review, we said that the aim would be for an inaugural meeting in the first half of 2009. The National Security Forum has since met for the first time, in March, which has helped us review proposals for the National Resilience Forum. Detailed proposals and the issue of invitations will commence as soon as possible after this review is complete.

Floods: Property Development

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs pursuant to the answer of 2 April 2009, Official Report, column 1302W, on floods: property development, how many local planning authorities are considered by the Environment Agency not to have complied with planning policy statement 25 in each of the last five years. (273523)

The Environment Agency has advised that the number of planning applications given planning permission against its advice on flood risk grounds over the past five years, and the number of local planning authorities (LPAs) this represented, is as follows:

Total number of planning applications permitted against Environment Agency advice on flood risk

Total number of LPAs granting planning permission against an Environment Agency flood risk objection

2003-04

323

85

2004-05

248

108

2005-06

136

82

2006-07

110

72

2007-08

124

76

Planning policy statement (PPS) 25, ‘Development and Flood Risk’, was published in December 2006. Prior to that date, national planning policy on development and flood risk was set out in planning policy guidance note 25. These policies apply only to England.

It is for the local planning authority to determine planning applications in accordance with the development plan for the area, taking account of the particular circumstances of each application and subject to other material planning considerations.

Further detailed information about the extent to which local planning authorities have taken account of the Environment Agency’s advice on flood risk is set out in the Environment Agency’s annual ‘Development and Flood Risk’ monitoring report. The most recent report was published in February 2009, covering the period 2007-08. This shows that where flood risk was an issue, around 96 per cent. of all planning application decisions, as notified to the Environment Agency, were in line with the Environment Agency’s advice.

Hydroelectric Power: Licensing

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many water abstraction licences for hydro-electric schemes the Environment Agency has (a) received an application for, (b) issued and (c) refused in (i) England and (ii) Wales in each of the last three years. (275947)

The number of abstraction licence applications received and new abstraction licences granted for hydropower schemes are given in the following table. The Environment Agency introduced a national Water Resources authorisations receipt tracking system in November 2008. As a result, data on the number of applications received and refused are only available from November 2008 onwards. Prior to this, information was not held centrally. To collate pre-2008 data would incur disproportionate costs.

Applications receivedLicences refusedLicences issued

England

Wales

England

Wales

England

Wales

2006

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

11

0

2007

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

4

2

2008

4

0

0

0

10

1

2009

13

0

0

0

7

0

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

1 Carlton Gardens

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs pursuant to the answer to the hon. Member for Bromley and Chislehurst of 27 February 2009, Official Report, column 1196W, on departmental buildings, to what use the ministerial residence within 1 Carlton Gardens has been put. (274141)

The ministerial residence within 1 Carlton Gardens has not been used since 16 October 2007 but the Foreign and Commonwealth Office uses the function rooms of 1 Carlton Gardens for a range of events hosted by Ministers and senior officials, as well as other departmental meetings.

Afghanistan: Peacekeeping Operations

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what discussions he has had with the Pakistani Government on minimisation of civilian casualties during military operations in Buner and Lower Dir. (273146)

[holding answer 7 May 2009]: My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary last discussed the situation in North West Frontier province with Foreign Minister Qureshi on 25 April 2009. As part of our wider defence engagement programme, we will continue our efforts to build the capacity of the Pakistani military to mount effective operations that minimise civilian casualties. The UK is also helping the Government of Pakistan to meet the urgent humanitarian needs of those most directly affected by insecurity. We have so far dispersed £2 million and have recently committed an additional £10 million. Our funds are being channelled through humanitarian agencies on the ground to give food supplies and shelter to those most in need, as well as supplying essential water and sanitation and basic health care.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what information his Department holds on the deployment of armed US Predator unmanned aerial vehicles from airbases within Pakistan. (273322)

US actions should be discussed between the US and Pakistani Governments. We cannot comment on intelligence matters.

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs whether he has had recent discussions with the Government of Pakistan on the deployment of armed US Predator unmanned aerial vehicles within Pakistani airspace. (273323)

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs pursuant to the answer to the hon. Member for Mid-Sussex of 27 April 2009, Official Report, column 1030W, on Afghanistan: peacekeeping operations, what the dates were of the secondment of each UK official to the US-led review of American defence and security policy; and if he will make a statement. (274388)

I refer the hon. Member to the answer my hon. Friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Gillian Merron) gave on 26 November 2008, Official Report, columns 1795-1796W.

British Indian Ocean Territory: Nature Conservation

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what discussions he has had with ministerial colleagues on the possibility of formulating a long-term conservation framework with a natural conservation area in the British Indian Ocean Territory. (274602)

The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) and the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) Administration are committed to high standards of environmental protection in BIOT. There is a legislative framework, protection of sites and species of particular importance, and designated reserves (an area of Diego Garcia has been designated as a Wetland of International Importance under the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands). These have contributed to the very high levels of nature conservation achieved in the territory.

The FCO and BIOT Administration are keen to explore options for further enhancing levels of environmental protection in BIOT and welcome the interest expressed, for example, by the Chagos Environment Network who have recently proposed the establishment of a large-scale Marine Protected Area.

These issues have not been the subject of discussion with ministerial colleagues, but FCO officials have been asked to engage with officials in other Government Departments.

Colombia: Foreign Relations

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what his latest assessment is of the state of relations between the UK and Colombia; and if he will make a statement. (273847)

The UK maintains a constructive partnership with Colombia, working with the Colombian Government, international and civil society partners on a number of shared challenges including human rights, counter-narcotics, impunity and climate change.

My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary gave a written ministerial statement on UK policy towards Colombia on 30 March 2009, Official Report, column 40WS, which outlined changes to the way we deliver our objectives in Colombia, including giving priority to tackling impunity in the criminal justice system, and promoting the work of human rights and civil society organisations in Colombia.

Conflict Resolution

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what assessment he has made of the performance of the right hon. Dr Jack McConnell MSP in his capacity as the Prime Minister's Special Representative for Conflict Resolution Mechanisms since his appointment in October 2008. (273825)

[holding answer 8 May 2009]: The right hon. Jack McConnell MSP, the Prime Minister’s Special Representative on Conflict Resolution Mechanisms has made a valuable contribution to advancing the UK’s peace building objectives since his appointment in October 2008. He has in particular engaged with the UN Secretariat and key stakeholders around the world to press for an ambitious UN Secretary-General report on peace building in the immediate aftermath of conflict.

Democratic Republic of Congo: Security

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what his most recent assessment is of the security situation in South Kivu; and if he will make a statement. (275316)

Over the last month the security situation in South Kivu has remained tense. Joint operations by the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) military and UN peacekeepers against the Rwandan Hutu Democratic Liberation Forces of Rwanda (FDLR) militia have begun. For the time being, the FDLR continues to pose a serious threat to the civilian population in South Kivu, and to commit atrocities in eastern DRC.

I welcome the effort to apply pressure to the FDLR. We are providing support to help FDLR fighters who wish to leave the organisation to do so. Former members of other militias in South Kivu are entering into a process of integration into the DRC army.

Departmental Mobile Phones

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how many (a) BlackBerry devices and (b) mobile telephones have been lost by (i) Ministers, (ii) special advisers and (iii) civil servants in his Department in each year since 2005. (274466)

Departmental Public Expenditure

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs pursuant to the answer of 27 April 2009, Official Report, column 1032W, on departmental public expenditure, what resource allocation was made for each overseas post for (a) 2007-08 and (b) 2008-09. (272913)

The following table gives net administration allocations by post for 2007-08 and 2008-09. Programme allocations are not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

£

Net budget

Post name

2007-08

2008-09

Abu Dhabi

1,572,681

1,752,716

Abuja

3,554,614

5,020,710

Accra

3,086,040

3,257,524

Addis Ababa

1,171,123

1,329,804

Alexandria

202,731

238,579

Algiers

1,533,265

2,188,879

Amman

2,017,393

3,067,325

Amsterdam

834,716

779,968

Anguilla

299,755

Ankara

2,948,293

4,465,499

Ashgabat

319,179

414,932

Asmara

124,650

183,269

Astana

851,062

1,115,209

Athens

3,270,021

3,830,127

Auckland

377,800

377,806

Baghdad

26,584,327

2,673,946

Bahrain

653,994

883,516

Baku

784,919

1,137,164

Bandar Seri Begawan

493,331

725,516

Bangkok

2,071,120

2,818,570

Banjul

503,026

562,103

Basra

6,800,947

1,426,582

Beirut

1,486,136

2,022,993

Belgrade

1,926,599

2,561,436

Belmopan

996,494

1,036,158

Berlin

9,619,290

11,174,075

Berne

2,080,823

3,022,511

Bogota

1,791,605

2,288,380

Bordeaux

92,591

87,580

Brasilia

2,820,941

4,511,063

Bratislava

720,791

846,555

Bridgetown

989,862

1,202,104

Brisbane

346,801

432,226

Brussels

1,759,722

1,769,060

Brussels Jmo

1,545,524

2,108,133

Brussels Ukdel

1,230,250

1,273,536

Brussels Ukrep

4,722,787

5,428,993

Bucharest

1,696,001

2,024,966

Budapest

1,769,921

2,084,513

Buenos Aires

1,992,059

2,285,505

Cairo

1,681,938

2,185,528

Canberra

3,826,469

4,708,828

Cape Town

667,062

698,572

Caracas

1,314,228

1,798,230

Castries

76,124

122,533

Chennai

1,118,356

1,175,587

Chisinau

383,987

442,085

Chongqing

701,261

761,355

Colombo (inc. Maldives)

983,532

1,198,960

Copenhagen (inc. Torshavn)

2,818,761

3,525,259

Dakar

404,312

521,654

Damascus

748,137

1,200,735

Dar Es Salaam

783,804

928,956

Dhaka

2,251,636

2,399,027

Doha

1,196,202

1,798,694

Dubai

2,469,473

3,266,203

Dublin

2,686,160

3,035,020

Dushanbe

426,892

555,239

Dusseldorf

3,171,526

3,781,535

Ekaterinburg

282,226

302,869

Erbil

140,569

Freetown

1,108,162

1,289,409

Gaborone

207,884

257,933

Geneva

2,785,634

3,760,260

Georgetown

555,005

601,409

Gibraltar

1,269,485

1,079,654

Grand Cayman

226,174

151,865

Grand Turk

305,617

317,317

Guangzhou

1,413,497

2,097,406

Guatemala City

1,010,725

730,975

Hanoi

611,542

728,040

Harare

1,487,040

1,815,506

Havana

1,080,012

1,158,045

Helsinki

1,809,797

2,087,428

Ho Chi Minh City

331,617

515,784

Hong Kong CG

4,639,855

4,705,475

Honiara

158,607

176,287

Islamabad

3,848,446

3,934,619

Istanbul

2,992,285

2,055,233

Jakarta

1,999,872

2,270,617

Jeddah

902,238

0

Jerusalem

1,349,103

1,938,662

Johannesburg

842,801

1,007,857

Kabul

12,169,820

19,635,051

Kampala

1,588,297

1,423,909

Karachi

822,293

851,778

Kathmandu

707,020

757,460

Khartoum

2,193,939

3,780,923

Kiev

1,489,357

2,365,230

Kigali

520,046

509,329

Kingston

1,787,526

2,640,442

Kinshasa

1,165,842

1,677,009

Kirkuk

1,390,059

0

Kolkata

321,640

300,305

Kuala Lumpur

1,636,764

2,182,163

Kuwait

1,569,723

2,278,500

La Paz

345,724

482,107

Lagos (inc. Cotonou)

5,514,863

7,115,131

Lille

101,438

119,466

Lilongwe (inc. Blantyre)

488,178

497,066

Lima

1,117,531

1,486,548

Lisbon

2,139,305

2,489,812

Ljubljana

679,431

804,564

Luanda

1,205,953

1,421,398

Lusaka

898,246

1,019,562

Luxembourg

581,764

538,044

Lyon

80,207

88,686

Madrid

7,728,424

9,386,780

Manila

1,829,679

2,016,352

Maputo

786,037

789,291

Marseilles

77,506

63,600

Melbourne

590,268

739,641

Mexico City

2,818,773

2,912,994

Minsk

220,814

273,281

Montevideo

546,380

1,244,751

Montreal

278,223

173,676

Moscow

6,181,190

7,149,679

Mumbai

1,557,814

2,000,928

Munich

954,763

1,000,437

Muscat

1,097,759

1,521,012

Nairobi

2,824,968

3,328,947

New Delhi

7,447,508

7,824,391

New York Cg

2,361,293

0

Nicosia

2,195,677

2,922,541

Osaka

1,184,605

1,870,801

Oslo

2,047,093

2,327,855

Ottawa

3,696,031

3,257,247

Panama City

413,424

609,718

Paris

10,746,611

13,302,223

Peking (Beijing)

4,773,854

6,313,945

Perth

248,474

338,546

Phnom Penh

326,998

463,172

Plymouth

310,536

279,616

Podgorica

255,393

Port Louis

370,368

476,964

Port Moresby

299,819

490,659

Port Of Spain

1,138,262

1,188,935

Prague

1,582,009

2,073,835

Pretoria

2,737,135

3,744,963

Pristina

532,812

704,319

Pyongyang

189,743

220,053

Quito

444,535

544,209

Rabat

1,739,766

2,209,227

Rangoon

567,660

766,378

Reykjavik

507,994

415,063

Riga

576,851

782,674

Rio De Janeiro

1,176,852

1,671,389

Riyadh

2,256,078

4,218,700

Rome

7,280,184

8,979,533

San Jose

304,663

589,949

Sana'a

1,449,958

1,374,296

Santiago

1,183,681

1,940,182

Santo Domingo

291,616

392,158

Sao Paulo

1,785,853

2,541,755

Sarajevo

858,826

974,585

Seoul

2,856,603

2,833,744

Shanghai

1,617,187

2,092,390

Singapore

2,322,457

3,225,627

Skopje

617,985

812,888

Sofia

1,070,516

1,113,034

St. George's

64,829

20,000

St. John's

132,290

66,409

St. Petersburg

828,538

972,984

Stanley

103,220

251,653

Stockholm

2,264,286

2,768,901

Strasbourg

201,803

216,288

Suva

590,919

674,896

Sydney

1,435,245

1,473,760

Taipei Btco

1,256,380

1,347,774

Tallinn

626,126

890,640

Tashkent

643,125

738,165

Tbilisi

607,777

905,533

Tehran

2,419,129

3,067,194

Tel Aviv

2,026,430

2,676,651

The Hague

2,377,310

2,481,914

Tirana

552,704

567,072

Tokyo

7,590,776

9,319,443

Toronto

1,169,826

1,256,037

Tortola

474,129

281,621

Tripoli

2,034,987

2,174,438

Tunis

814,700

980,533

UKMis New York

3,781,613

4,449,125

Ulaanbaatar

253,919

170,803

Valletta

695,316

804,351

Vancouver

375,147

647,884

Victoria

247,500

198,928

Vienna

3,488,089

3,959,201

Vilnius

626,692

859,001

Warsaw

2,180,512

2,535,063

Washington

17,375,714

23,212,645

Wellington

1,620,198

1,647,447

Windhoek

299,991

262,758

Yaounde

637,766

733,532

Yerevan

385,782

532,762

Zagreb

1,016,346

1,223,445

Departmental Stationery