Written Answers to Questions
Friday 15 May 2009
Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Advantage West Midlands: Expenditure
The revenue and capital expenditure of Advantage West Midlands since 1998-99 has been as follows:
Revenue Capital 1998-991 0.4 1999-2000 57 47 2000-01 62 51 2001-02 78 62 2002-03 100 104 2003-04 117 123 2004-05 115 104 2005-06 146 142 2006-07 152 130 2007-08 141 150 2008-092 133 162 1 No split available, mainly administrative costs. 2 Latest estimate.
Community Investment Fund
Tables showing the Community Investment Fund projects carried out by the RDAs since 2000 will be placed in the Libraries of the House.
Departmental Databases
(2) what databases managed by his Department and its agencies hold personal information on members of the public; on what date each such database became operational; and if he will make a statement.
The Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform does not hold any protected personal information about members of the public in any of its databases.
I have asked the Chief Executives of Companies House and the Insolvency Service to respond to the hon. Member directly.
Letter from Stephen Speed, dated 15 May 2009:
The Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform has asked me to reply to you directly on behalf of The Insolvency Service on what categories of his personal information about members of the public are contained on each relevant database managed by his Department and its agencies; on what date each category of information began to be collected; and if he will make a statement.
The requested details for the databases managed by the Insolvency Service Agency are contained in the following table:
Database Categories of Personal Information held Date the data began to be collected LOIS—(Official Receiver’s Case Management System) Name, address, occupation, date and place of birth, national insurance number, for individual insolvents April 1993 for all categories of data Name, address, occupation, date and place of birth, national insurance number, for directors of insolvent companies Name and address details for creditors LOLA—(Financial administration system for Official Receiver’s cases) Full name for individual insolvents April 1996 for all categories of data Name, address and (in some cases) bank account details for creditors BANCS (Financial administration system for Insolvency Practitioner cases) Full name for individual insolvents October 1994 for all categories of data Name, address and (in some cases) bank account details for creditors Central Index—(Consolidated summary database for Official Receiver and Insolvency Practitioner cases) Name, address, occupation, date and place of birth, national insurance number for individual insolvents April 1994 for all categories of data Name, address, occupation, date and place of birth, national insurance number, for directors of insolvent companies Name, address and contact details for Insolvency Practitioners DRO—(Debt Relief Order database) Name, address, occupation, date and place of birth, national insurance number for individual insolvents. April 1994 for all categories of data Name, address, occupation, date and place of birth, national insurance number, for directors of insolvent companies Name, address and contact details for Insolvency Practitioners I-Solv—(Database of applicants for online bankruptcy) Name, address, occupation, date and place of birth, national insurance number, for individual insolvents April 2005 for all categories of data Name, address and claim details for creditors Name, address and details of amounts owing for debtors CHIRPS—(Redundancy Payments Service case management system) Name, address, occupation, date and place of birth, national insurance number, bank account details for applicants for statutory redundancy payments November 1997 for all categories of data EMS—(Investigations and enforcement case management system) Name, address, and date of birth for individuals who are the subject of investigation or enforcement activities April 2005 for all categories of data IBIS—(Case management system of Companies Investigation Branch) Name, address, and contact details of complainants January 2002 for all categories of data Name, address, date and place of birth of disqualified directors e-IRR Online, searchable database of current individual insolvency orders) Name, address, occupation, date of birth for individuals subject to insolvency orders April 2004 Name, address, occupation, date of birth, date and duration of restriction, for individuals subject to a Bankruptcy Restrictions Order June 2004 Disqualified Directors Database Name, address, date of birth, date and duration of order, for directors subject to a disqualification order September 2005 Finance Section Database Name, address and bank account details for individual payees in relation to redundancy payment claims April 2006 Name, address and bank details of job applicants (successful and unsuccessful) who were paid expenses for job interviews and tests April 2004
Letter from Stephen Speed, dated 15 May 2009:
The Minister of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform has asked me to reply to you directly on behalf of The Insolvency Service on what databases managed by his Department and its agencies hold personal information on individual members of the public; on what date each such database became operational; and if he will make a statement.
The requested details for the databases managed by the Insolvency Service Agency are contained in the following table:
Database Date the database became operational LOIS—(Official Receiver’s Case Management System) April 1993 LOLA—(Financial administration system for Official Receiver’s cases) April 1996 BANCS—(Financial administration system for Insolvency Practitioner cases) October 1994 Central Index—(Consolidated summary database for Official Receiver and Insolvency Practitioner cases) April 1994 DRO—(Debt Relief Order database) April 2009 I-Solv—(Database of online applicants for bankruptcy) April 2005 CHIRPS—(Redundancy Payments Service case management system) November 1997 EMS—(Investigations and enforcement case management system) April 2005 IBIS—(Case management system of Companies Investigation Branch) January 2002 e-IRR (Online, searchable database of current individual insolvency orders) April 2004 Database of Disqualified Directors September 2005 Finance Section Database April 2004
Letter from Gareth Jones, dated 15 May 2009:
I am replying on behalf of Companies House to your Parliamentary Question tabled on 6 May 2009, UIN 274174, to the Minister of State for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform.
Companies House is required by legislation to hold the following personal information about members of the public:
Names, addresses and dates of birth of company directors.
Names and addresses of company secretaries.
Names and addresses of company shareholders.
This information has been collected under various Companies Acts since 1844 but has only been held on an electronic database since 1986.
Letter from Gareth Jones, dated 15 May 2009:
I am replying on behalf of Companies House to your Parliamentary Question tabled on 6 May 2009, UIN 274175, to the Minister of State for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform.
The current register of companies database (known as CHIPS) became operational on 25 February 2008, superseding the previous version of the database (known as STEM), which had been operational since 1986. There is also an image database, holding electronic images of documents filed, which became operational in 1995. All these databases hold personal information, most of which is publicly available.
Departmental Written Questions
The information requested is not available in a format to reply without incurring disproportionate cost. This applies equally to researching the House "Parliamentary Information Management System".
However, in the three-month period from December 2008 to February 2009, the Department received a total of 566 ordinary written parliamentary questions of which 225 were answered within five sitting days. Of the 566, a total of 20 remain to be answered.
The information requested is not available in a format to reply without incurring disproportionate cost. This applies equally to researching the House "Parliamentary Information Management System".
However, in the three-month period from December 2008 to February 2009, the Department received a total of 188 named day parliamentary questions (including first order questions which could not be answered in the Chamber). Of the 188, a total of 52 were answered on the date specified. A total of five remain to be answered.
Motor Vehicles: Manufacturing Industries
The Government fully appreciate the difficulties that the automotive industry is experiencing during the current economic downturn.
While we are supporting a range of automotive support initiatives, we do not believe that introducing a general wage subsidy for all employers is a feasible, cost effective and sustainable option for the UK. Past experience in the UK when running a wage subsidy programme in the 1970s was that wage subsidies acted to create distortions and perverse incentives for other sectors and companies to bargain for subsidies.
We believe that the future success of British industry will be based on a highly skilled workforce, and where production is being reduced we are helping business train their workforces to ensure they emerge from the economic downturn in the best possible shape to compete in the future.
Automotive companies can access funding for training from Government and the Sector Skills Council for Science, Engineering and Manufacturing Technologies. Following demand from the automotive industry for this support, funding under the “Train To Gain” scheme for the sector has been increased substantially up to £100 million from the original budget of £65 million.
Tourism: Finance
BERR and other Government Departments are involved in development of each RDA’s Regional Economic Strategy (RES) and in approving each region’s Corporate Plan. The plans are reviewed to ensure that the RDAs deliver against ministerial priorities and priorities identified in the RES.
The RDAs took on strategic responsibility for tourism development in the regions in 2003, and have developed tourism strategies and delivery structures in line with their RES. DCMS works with the RDAs in advancing and assessing progress on key strategic objectives through:
the 2012 Ministerial Advisory Group, which guides the delivery of the national tourism strategy (“Winning: A tourism strategy for 2012 and beyond”);
the Ministerial Monitoring and Implementation Group, which guides the delivery of the national skills strategy;
the Welcome to Britain Group, which is working to improve the overall visitor welcome and experience;
Partners for England, which focuses on improved resource and policy co-ordination at national, regional and local levels;
the RDA Tourism Leads group, which provides a forum for cross-regional co-operation, collaboration and leadership.
Children, Schools and Families
Class Sizes
The requested information is shown in the table.
Average class sizes1 as at January 2008 in England, by local authorityKey stage1,2Maintained primary3State-funded secondary3,4England25.726.220.920 Local authority areas with the highest level of deprivation5Liverpool24.324.619.2Hackney26.525.820.9Tower Hamlets27.726.321.1Manchester26.126.621.3Knowsley24.825.720.5Newham27.126.823.1Islington25.125.522.1Middlesbrough22.523.519.3Birmingham27.126.820.5Kingston Upon Hull, City of25.225.722.0Blackpool27.127.822.0Nottingham24.725.719.4Sandwell26.526.720.6Salford25.026.020.9Stoke-on-Trent26.026.521.4Blackburn with Darwen26.427.121.4Haringey27.827.519.4Lambeth27.325.920.4Leicester24.824.922.5Barking and Dagenham27.026.919.920 Local Authority Areas with the lowest level of deprivation5West Sussex26.126.621.2Kingston upon Thames28.227.120.4City of London30.024.8n/aBedfordshire24.324.521.4Hertfordshire26.626.720.0Cambridgeshire26.327.022.0Bath and North East Somerset26.026.020.2Oxfordshire24.625.620.5Leicestershire25.125.922.1Hampshire26.327.022.1Wiltshire24.925.720.7South Gloucestershire25.426.520.1Richmond upon Thames28.026.523.5Buckinghamshire25.125.620.6Bracknell Forest26.826.821.2Windsor and Maidenhead24.025.520.0West Berkshire25.025.219.1Surrey26.827.021.7Rutland25.325.223.8Wokingham24.826.319.7 n/a=. Not Applicable1 Classes taught by 1 teacher.2 Includes reception classes.3 Includes middle schools as deemed.4 Includes Academies and City Technology Colleges.5 Ranked according to the indices of multiple deprivation.Source: School Census
Education
I refer the hon. Member to the reply given on 5 May 2009, Official Report, columns 150-54W. This set out the number of posts we expect to transfer to each local authority from the Learning and Skills Council, subject to the passage of the Apprenticeships, Learning and Skills Bill. We are currently working with the LSC to determine how much funding will transfer to local authorities with each post from April 2010.
Education: Assessments
The Department began collecting information in sufficient detail to answer this question in 2002-03. No comparable data are available for previous years. The information in the table covers the combined costs of all relevant examination entry fees, including GCSEs, A/AS-levels and GNVQs, and any accreditation costs related to pupils. We do not collect separate data on each type of exam.
Financial year Examination fees (E21)1 (£)2 2002-03 155,611,000 2003-04 173,843,000 2004-05 198,227,000 2005-06 220,056,000 2006-07 240,861,000 2007-083 265,305,000 1 Includes expenditure by local authority maintained schools in England on the costs of examination entry fees, and costs of accreditation related to pupils (the payments centres make to awarding bodies to register with them to take their qualification). This includes GCSEs, A/AS-levels and GNVQs and covers administrative costs e.g. external marking; it excludes the cost of exam resources, such as the test papers themselves. 2 Figures are rounded to the nearest £000. 3 2007-08 data remain provisional and subject to change. Source: http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/localauthorities/section52/subPage.cfm?action=section52.default&ID=58 (Budget Data Archive)
Education: Finance
I have been asked to reply.
The Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) is the responsibility of the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills. As such it would be for this Department to discuss the transfer of this budget from the Department of Health. However, there have been no discussions on this subject in recent years.
Foster Care
Information about the numbers of foster carers who have fostered children in the three categories listed is not collected centrally.
GCE A-Level
The answer is provided in the following table:
Number Percentage Maths F-Maths Maths F-Maths 2004 554 31 13.8 0.8 2005 567 31 13.2 0.7 2006 591 42 14.3 1.0 2007 686 56 16.4 1.3 2008 705 53 17.1 1.3 Notes:1. The figures are based on pupils aged 16 to 18 years. 2. Percentages are based on the cohort of pupils eligible for free school meals who sat at least one GCE A-level. Source: National Pupil Database.
The most readily available analysis is given in the following table:
Number Number of pupils who achieved 3 A grades at A-level in 2008 and achieved 5 or more A* or A GCSE grades 13,660 did not achieve 5 or more A* or A GCSE grades 857 Prior attainment not available 147 Total 14,664 Notes: 1. Figures relate to 16 to 18-year-olds (age at start of academic year, i.e. 31 August 2007) in maintained schools (including academies and CTCs) in England. Figures relate to achievements in GCE/VCE/Applied A-level/Double Awards and full and vocational GCSEs only. 2. Not all of these pupils will have taken their GCSE examinations in 2006 or in maintained schools. Pupils who took their GCSE examinations in 2006 and achieved at least three As in their A-levels in a year other than 2008 are not included. Source: National Pupil Database
GCSE: Young Offender Institutions
[holding answer 7 May 2009]: The individualised learning record (ILR) data LSC collected for 2006/07 do not allow us to answer the specific questions on the range of grades achieved. However these data show that during the 2006/07 academic year there were a total of 68 GCSE achievements by 15 to 17-year-olds in Prison Service YOIs, of which:
19 people achieved one GCSE;
Five people achieved two GCSEs;
13 people achieved three GCSEs;
The LSC’s young persons’ learning 1 (YOL1) data show that during the 2007/08 academic year, for young people under the age of 18, there were 106 GCSE achievements between grades A and C, and 159 GCSE achievements below grade C. However the data set allowing us to break this down into the number of people achieving different numbers of GCSEs (i.e. ILR) is not yet available for the 2007/08 academic year.
Also, note that the figures quoted will not include all of the GCSEs achieved by young people in juvenile custody, as some young people in custody are still registered at schools and colleges and any GCSEs that they achieve while in custody will be reflected in achievement figures of schools and colleges, rather than the figures reported by the LSC in these statistics.
Also, many young people stay in custody only for a very short time, and therefore it is not realistic for them to achieve long-term qualifications while they are in custody, especially as GCSEs can only be taken at certain points of the year.
Members: Correspondence
A response to the letter, from Baroness Delyth Morgan, was sent to the hon. Member on 5 May 2009.
National Curriculum Tests: Disadvantaged
(2) how many and what percentage of pupils (a) eligible and (b) ineligible for free school meals achieved level 8 at Key Stage 3 in each of the last three years.
The requested information is not available for 1997 as prior to 2002 individual pupil characteristic information was not collected. The introduction of the Pupil Level Annual School Census (PLASC) in January 2002, which collects such information, meant that from 2002, pupil characteristic data could be matched to attainment data, allowing analyses of different groups of pupils.
The 2002 information is shown as follows:
English Maths Science English Maths Science English Maths Science English Maths Science Non FSM 496,439 497,397 497,912 56,510 91,789 55,646 5,924 21,831 4,782 1 4 1 FSM 96,741 97,299 97,488 2,663 5,120 2,126 177 542 69 0 1 0 All pupil1 598,309 600,141 600,849 59,493 97,438 58,109 6,131 22,563 4,893 1 4 1 1 Includes pupils for whom FSM information was not sought or for which information was refused
The 2005 information is shown as follows:
English Maths Science English Maths Science English Maths Science English Maths Science Non FSM 512,353 512,162 512,626 53,377 113,581 67,435 — 30,342 — — 6 — FSM 94,804 94,689 94,875 2,048 7,240 2,313 — 901 — — 1 — All pupil1 611,274 610,947 611,629 55,630 121,325 69,986 — 31,365 — — 5 — 1 Includes pupils for whom FSM information was not sought or for which information was refused.
The 2006 information is shown as follows:
English Maths Science English Maths Science English Maths Science English Maths Science Non FSM 512,623 513,092 513,371 56,270 125,629 84,998 — 45,137 — — 9 — FSM 90,671 90,700 90,855 2,364 9,233 3,362 — 1,543 — — 2 — All pupil1 607,174 607,707 608,156 58,903 135,469 88,756 — 46,894 — — 8 — 1 Includes pupils for whom FSM information was not sought or for which information was refused.
The 2007 information is shown as follows:
English Maths Science English Maths Science English Maths Science English Maths Science Non FSM 495,289 495,655 496,155 44,577 114,235 84,570 — 44,471 — — 9 — FSM 86,713 86,708 86,846 1,749 8,234 3,519 — 1,652 — — 2 — All pupil1 582,002 582,363 583,001 46,326 122,469 88,089 — 46,123 — — 8 — 1 Includes pupils for whom FSM information was not sought or for which information was refused.
From 2003, level 8 can be achieved only in mathematics following the end of extension papers at KS3.
National Curriculum Assessment and GCSE/GNVQ Attainment by Pupil Characteristics, in England 2002 (final) and 2003 (provisional) can be found in SFR04/2004, at:
http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000448/index.shtml
The National Curriculum Assessments by Pupil Characteristics, GCSE and Equivalent Attainment and Post-16 Attainment by Pupil Characteristics, in England 2005 can be found in SFR09/2006, at:
http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000640/index.shtml
The National Curriculum Assessments by Pupil Characteristics, GCSE and Equivalent Attainment and Post-16 Attainment by Pupil Characteristics, in England 2005/06 (Provisional) can be found in SFR46/2006, at:
http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000693/index.shtml
The National Curriculum Assessments by Pupil Characteristics, GCSE and Equivalent Attainment and Post-16 Attainment by Pupil Characteristics, in England 2006/07 can be found in SFR38/2007, at:
http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s000759/index.shtml
Physical Education: Facilities
The Department relies on local authorities and schools to decide how much capital should be spent on physical educational facilities, and does not maintain central records of expenditure incurred or planned during the period 2007-08 to 2010-11. No financial commitment has been made by the Department beyond 31 March 2011.
In February 2008, the Secretary of State announced a capital programme to improve facilities for PE and sport at the most needy sports colleges. £10 million was allocated to sports colleges in 2008-09 and £21.5 million in 2009-10.
Pupil Referral Units
The local authority areas are shown against the pupil referral units (PRUs) and are listed as follows.
Local authority name PRU name Kent Ashford and Shepway Alternative Curriculum PRU Bradford Bradford District PRU Kent Canterbury and Swale Alternative Curriculum PRU Coventry Chace Extended Learning Centre Brent Church Lane Pupil Referral Unit Salford Clifton and Grosvenor Centre Kent Dartford and Gravesham Sunderland Ks1 Pupil Referral Unit Sunderland KS2/3 PRU Solihull Lanchester PRU Kent Maidstone and Malling Alternative Curriculum PRU Doncaster Maple Medical PRU Doncaster Nexus Centre Liverpool Primary Centre Wigan Pupil Support Centre Sunderland School Returners/Young Mums Provision Liverpool Secondary Centre Leicester Short Course Centre Southwark Southwark Inclusive Learning Service KS3, KS4 and Sils+ Doncaster Springboard Centre Rotherham St. Mary’s Centre Kent Thanet and Dover Alternative Curriculum PRU Hampshire The Ashwood Centre Wigan The Beechwood Centre Rotherham The Bridge Sunderland The Cheadle Centre Doncaster The Gateway Centre Wigan The Lilford Centre Wigan The Phoenix Centre Rotherham The Rowan Centre Kent Tonbridge, Tunbridge Wells and Sevenoaks Alternative Curriculum PRU Nottingham Unity Learning Centre
Local authority name PRU name Nottingham Alternative Provision PRU Doncaster Beckett Road Centre Coventry Centre 4 Lambeth Charles Edward Brooke Refugee Centre Co Charles Edward Brooke CofE School Cornwall Cornwall Hospital Education Service Rotherham Greasbrough Centre Stockton-on-Tees Greengates Primary Pupil Support Centre Doncaster Hexthorpe Centre Doncaster Hospital and Interim Tuition Service Somerset Link Education Centre (Orchard Lodge) Liverpool Mill Road Pupil Referral Unit, Ipors Centre Wigan Park Centre Southwark Southwark Inclusive Learning Service Plus (Sils+) Wigan Summit Centre Sunderland Sunderland Pupil Referral Unit Rotherham The Bridge Salford The Clifton Centre Southwark The Education Support Centre Wigan The Gerard Pupil Referral Unit Salford The Grosvenor Centre Doncaster The Long Sandall Centre Lincolnshire The Willows Centre Pupil Referral Unit Leeds Tinshill Learning Centre Doncaster Young Parents Centre Milton Keynes Young People Out of School Project Source: EduBase
Pupils
The Department does not provide guidance to local authorities on the likely effects on school roll projections of changes in levels of immigration. This is for authorities to determine, based on their knowledge of local demographics.
Schools: Closures
School place planning is the statutory responsibility of individual local authorities (LAs). This includes making sure there are sufficient school places, and also removing surplus places when required. To facilitate this LAs have the power to propose the closure of maintained schools.
Where LAs propose to make any changes to local school provision, including closures, they must follow a statutory process, which is then decided under established local decision making arrangements. Ministers have no direct roll in the process.
Schools: Expenditure
The Department's grants and programmes aggregated as within other miscellaneous programmes for 2010-11 are provided in the following table:
Schools: 2010-11 (£ million) Music and Dance 37 Redundancy Costs 12 TDA 593 NCSL 83 Partnership for Schools 1 Teachers TV 9 National Strategies 473 Total 1,209
The Department’s grants and programmes aggregated as within other standards funds for (a) 2007-08 and (b) 2010-11 are provided in the following table:
£ million Other standards fund 2007-08 2010-11 Schools Development Grant 1,898 2,133 Local Area Agreement Grant 166 — Total 2,064 2,133
The Department's grants and programmes aggregated as within area based grants for 2010-11 are provided in the following table:
DCSF grants to local authorities 2010-11 (£ million) Connexions 467 Extended Schools - Start Up 71 School Development Grant (LA retained element) 168 Children's Fund 132 Positive Activities for Young People 95 Care Matters 55 Secondary National Strategy: Central Co-ordination 30 Primary National Strategy: Central Co-ordination 30 Teenage Pregnancy 28 School Improvement Partners 24 Extended Rights for Free Travel 29 Children's Social Care Workforce 18 School Intervention 15 Flexible 14 to 19 Partnerships Funding 15 Secondary Behaviour and Attendance: Central Co-ordination 14 Education Health Partnerships 13 Child Death Review Processes 8 Youth Substance Misuse 7 School Travel Advisers 7 Choice Advisers 6 Youth Taskforce 4 General Duty on Sustainable Travel To School 4 Designated Teacher Funding 3 Child Trust Fund 1 Total Area Based Grants 1,242
The total in this table contains figures that have been updated since the publication of the 2008 Departmental Report.
Schools: Sports
There is no strict definition of “community use” in the Building Schools for the Future Programme. As set out in the Extended Schools prospectus, published in June 2005, the Government have encouraged all schools to offer a core set of extended services by 2010, including wider community access to sports facilities. However, it is up to individual governing bodies to decide the extent to which they do this, since they are responsible for controlling the occupation and use of school premises both during and out of school hours. Governing bodies are also best placed to define what the community is that each school serves.
Secondary schools built or upgraded under the Building Schools for the Future (BSF) programme must conform to the Department's Building Bulletin (BB) 98, "Briefing Framework for Secondary School Projects". This recommends that each school should have, as a minimum, a “four-court” sports hall designed to Sport England's specifications that cover community use. BB 98 also includes recommendations for outdoor sports pitches and games courts.
BSF investment is therefore ensuring that secondary schools will have sports facilities for use by the communities in which they are placed.
Schools: Standards
[holding answer 11 May 2009]: This is a matter for Ofsted. HM Chief Inspector, Christine Gilbert, has written to the hon. Member and a copy of her reply has been placed in the House Libraries.
Letter from Christine Gilbert, dated 8 May 2009:
Your recent parliamentary question has been passed to me, as Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector, for reply.
The ‘inadequate’ inspection outcome was introduced in September 2005 as part of a four-point scale: outstanding, good, satisfactory, inadequate. Table A shows the outcome of the behaviour judgement for maintained schools inspected in each academic year since September 2005.
Academic year Number of school inspections which included a behaviour judgment Number of school inspections where behaviour was judged inadequate School inspections where behaviour was judged inadequate, as a percentage of all school inspections 2005/06 6,128 46 1 2006/07 18,264 55 1 2007/08 27,864 40 1 1 Excludes 59 school inspections using a reduced set of judgments that did not include a judgment on behaviour. 2 Excludes 2 school inspections of sixth form schools where only post-16 judgments were made. One of these inspections was judged to have good behaviour at the post-16 level, and the other had no behaviour judgment.
A copy of this reply has been sent to Rt Hon Jim Knight MP, Minister of State for Schools and Learners, and will be placed in the library of both Houses.
Schools: Transport
The requested information is shown in the table.
Number of pupils who walk to school Percentage of pupils who walk to school Number of pupils who cycle to school Percentage of pupils who cycle to school Total number of pupils for whom mode of travel was supplied4 Number/percentage of pupils5 3,148,390 49.9 123,010 1.9 6,312,120 1 Includes middle schools as deemed. 2 Includes CTCs and academies. 3 Includes maintained and non-maintained special schools. Excludes General Hospital schools. 4 The collection of mode of travel to school data is only mandatory at pupil level for schools with an approved school travel plan. Data were received for 6,312,120 of the total number of 7,461,230 pupils. 5 Solely registered pupils. Excludes boarders. Source: School Census.
Teachers: Recruitment
We have more teachers in the classroom than in 1997. We have a range of routes for people who want to change career into teaching and these can be accessed direct or via transition to teaching. Most take up either postgraduate certificates in education (PGCE) or the employment-based Graduate Teacher programme.
The Becoming a Teacher evaluation (Hobson et al., 2006) found that 97 per cent. of survey respondents reported feeling ‘very’ or ‘fairly’ confident that their ITT programme had prepared them to be an effective teacher. However, a higher proportion of employment-based trainees, and a lower proportion of PGCE trainees, than those following other routes reported feeling ‘very confident’ that their ITT route had prepared them to be an effective teacher.
Teachers: Training
There were 4,335 salary and training grant places allocated by the Training and Development Agency for Schools and these represent 93 per cent. of all Graduate Teacher Programme places in academic year 2008/09.
Information about trainees who did not gain Qualified Teacher Status (QTS) is only available for trainees in their final year of training. The tables show the number of final year ITT trainees for each academic year between 1998/99 and 2006/07 who did not gain QTS in their final year of training and of these the number who left their course before completion and the number where the outcome of QTS is unknown for:
1. Postgraduate ITT trainees
2. Undergraduate ITT trainees
3. Employment Based Routes (EBR) trainees
Information relating to the number of trainees through mainstream courses gaining QTS is only available from 1998/99 onwards. The same information for trainees on employment based routes was only collected from 2001/02 onwards. Figures relating to 2007/08 will be available in July 2009.
Number of postgraduate final year trainees who have not gained QTS Total number of mainstream trainees in their final year Number of mainstream final year trainees gaining QTS Known not to have completed course Undefined outcome Other outcome Total 1998/99 17,430 15,160 1,260 130 880 2,270 1999/2000 17,170 14,850 1,250 140 940 2,320 2000/01 18,680 16,150 1,310 250 970 2,530 2001/02 19,480 16,940 1,090 0 1,450 2,540 2002/03 21,590 19,180 1,020 * 1,400 2,410 2003/04 24,590 21,460 1,430 0 1,700 3,130 2004/05 25,200 21,780 1,390 20 2,010 3,420 2005/06 25,100 21,600 1,290 10 2,210 3,500 2006/07 24,660 21,080 1,210 * 2,370 3,580 * = Less than 5. Notes: 1. Includes trainees from Universities and other Higher Education Institutions, School Centred Initial Teacher Training and Open Universities but exclude Employment Based Routes (EBR). 2. Numbers are individually rounded to the nearest 10 and therefore may not sum. 3. ‘Other outcome’ includes final year trainees who are yet to complete their course, those with withheld QTS (including those where their skills test were not met, their standards were not met and where both their standards and skills test were not met) and those where the skills test has not been taken (including those whose standards were met and those whose standards were not met). Source: TDA Performance Profiles
2. Undergraduate ITT traineesNumber of undergraduate final year trainees who have not gained QTSTotal number of mainstream trainees in their final yearNumber of mainstream final year trainees gaining QTSKnown not to have completed courseUndefined outcomeOther outcomeTotal1998/999,7708,910503404708601999/20007,4906,850402103906402000/017,0406,490402402705502001/026,8706,3404004905302002/036,9806,25040*6907302003/046,3805,8805004605002004/056,1605,3602007707902005/066,1205,41020106807102006/076,6905,900400750790 * = Less than 5.Notes:1. Includes trainees from Universities and other Higher Education Institutions, School and Open Universities but exclude Employment Based Routes (EBR).2. Numbers are individually rounded to the nearest 10 and therefore may not sum.3. ‘Other outcome’ includes final year trainees who are yet to complete their course, those with withheld QTS (including those where their skills test were not met, their standards were not met and where both their standards and skills test were not met) and those where the skills test has not been taken (including those whose standards were met and those whose standards were not met).Source:TDA Performance Profiles
Number of EBR final year trainees who have not gained QTS Total number of mainstream trainees in their final year Number of mainstream final year trainees gaining QTS Known not to have completed course Undefined outcome Other outcome Total 2001/02 2,440 2,210 30 0 190 230 2002/03 4,030 3,670 340 0 20 360 2003/04 4,950 4,470 440 0 30 470 2004/05 7,220 6,600 260 0 350 610 2005/06 6,970 6,090 420 0 450 870 2006/07 7,840 7,120 350 0 380 720 Notes: 1. Includes trainees through Employment Based Routes (EBR) only. 2. Numbers are individually rounded to the nearest 10 and therefore may not sum. 3. ‘Other outcome’ includes final year trainees who are yet to complete their course, those with withheld QTS (including those where their skills test were not met, their standards were not met and where both their standards and skills test were not met) and those where the skills test has not been taken (including those whose standards were met and those whose standards were not met). Source: TDA Performance Profiles
Communities and Local Government
British Humanist Association
I met the British Humanist Association on 10 February 2009 to discuss a range of issues. My predecessor, the hon. Member for Gloucester (Mr. Dhanda), met the organisation on 12 November 2007.
Commission for Local Administration in England
The amount of grant paid by this Department to the local government ombudsman from 2004-05 to 2008-09 is set out in the Local Government Finance Report and is as follows:
£ 2004-05 11,058,000 2005-06 11,522,400 2006-07 13,221,000 2007-08 12,851,000 2008-09 12,600,000
For 2009-10 we have made provision in the Main Estimates of £16,155,000 for grants to the local government ombudsman, including a provision for possible future redundancies and a provision to fund the additional remit the ombudsman will have for schools and health matters, if and when the relevant provisions in the Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Bill and Health Bill currently before Parliament are enacted and come into force.
Council Tax
Information on the change in both percentage and cash terms in the average band D council tax in England and the average council tax per dwelling in England in both absolute and real terms in each year since 1997-98 is shown in the tables.
£ Percentage £ Percentage Band D, two adults for area 1997-982 42 6.5 36 4.0 1998-992 59 8.6 41 4.4 1999-2000 51 6.8 51 5.1 2000-01 49 6.1 32 3.1 2001-02 54 6.4 48 4.5 2002-03 75 8.2 75 6.7 2003-04 126 12.9 112 9.5 2004-052 65 5.9 43 3.3 2005-062 47 4.1 11 0.8 2006-07 54 4.5 25 1.9 2007-08 53 4.2 -4 -0.3 2008-092 52 3.9 -4 -0.3 2009-10 41 3.0 — — Average dwelling 1997-982 39 7.4 36 4.9 1998-992 50 8.9 36 4.6 1999-2000 42 6.8 42 5.2 2000-01 41 6.3 27 3.2 2001-02 44 6.3 39 4.5 2002-03 63 8.5 63 6.9 2003-04 104 12.9 93 9.5 2004-052 59 6.5 42 3.9 2005-062 42 4.3 12 1.1 2006-07 47 4.7 23 2.0 2007-08 45 4.3 -2 -0.2 2008-092 44 4.0 -2 -0.2 2009-10 30 2.6 — — 1 Adjusted using the all items retail prices index (RPI) as at April each year and based on April 2008 prices. 2 Amounts shown are after the designation of authorities requiring them to recalculate their budget requirement and council tax. Source: BR1, BR2, BR3 and CTB returns
The real terms change data for 2009-10 will not be available until after the publication of the April RPI figure on 19 May 2009.
Amounts shown are calculated on headline taxes and before benefits. Where indicated the figures are calculated after the designation of authorities that required them to recalculate their budget requirement and council tax.
The data are taken from the annual council tax base forms completed by all billing authorities in England and the Budget requirement forms completed by all billing and precepting authorities in England.
No. The Government agree with Sir Michael Lyons’s conclusion, following his inquiry into local government, that council tax is broadly sound and should be retained. In his report Sir Michael concluded that a local income tax would result in a “significant rebalancing of the tax burden”.
Council Tax: Valuation
A copy of the information referred to has been placed in the Library.
Departmental ICT
Communities and Local Government has outsourced its corporate IT service to Steria Limited and costs of maintaining IT equipment are absorbed into the annual cost of the service. The service cost for financial year April 2008 to March 2009 for that service was £4.5 million. Information on the cost of maintenance of other IT systems in the Department is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave on 6 May 2009, Official Report, column 234W to the hon. Member for Cardiff, Central (Jenny Willott).
Departmental Mobile Phones
There have been no BlackBerry devices or mobile telephones reported as lost by Ministers, or special advisers in Communities and Local Government, which was created in May 2006 or its predecessor, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, in any of the years since 2005.
However, one mobile phone was reported as lost by a civil servant in Communities and Local Government in the year 2008-09.
This answer does not include Government offices for the regions who carry out functions on behalf of 10 Government Departments.
Departmental Publications
The Department for Communities and Local Government intends to publish an evidence and innovation strategy in late 2009.
Departmental Stationery
Communities and Local Government Department was established in May 2006. Since that time the Department has spent the following on branded stationery:
Amount spent plus VAT 2006-07 18,642.50 2007-08 11,005.50 2008-09 7,198.65
For information relating to the amount spent on promotional materials for the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister between 2002 and the abolition of the Department in 2006, I refer the hon. Member to the answer given on 25 October 2006, Official Report, column 1934W.
Since the establishment of the Department for Communities and Local Government the costs of gifts for internal and external promotion are not held centrally and can be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Housing: Low Incomes
(2) what her Department's policy on the charging by local authorities of right to buy administrative costs to their housing revenue accounts is; and if she will make a statement.
A local authority is permitted to fund its administrative costs incidental to and of a right to buy (RTB) disposal from the receipt arising from that disposal.
A local authority's other administrative costs relating to RTB are required to be charged to its housing revenue account.
Local Government
The Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Bill provides for the Government to establish and fund the activities of the Local Authority Leaders’ Boards in relation to work on the preparation, drafting and implementation of the Regional Strategy.
The Department will be responsible for agreeing the scheme under which the Leaders’ Board in each region will be established and also for ensuring that value for money is obtained through agreement of business plans.
Local Government Finance
1 refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for Bromley and Chislehurst (Robert Neill) on 19 January 2009, Official Report, column 1074W.
No shire counties levy a separate fire precept.
I have today placed in the Library of the House, a table containing details of the gross debt that each local authority in England had at 31 March 2008.
The distribution of formula grant to local authorities in England takes account of the socio-economic and demographic characteristics of the authority, together with its relative ability to raise council tax, expressed in terms of the council tax base. We then ensure that every authority receives at least a minimum percentage increase (the ‘floor’) year-on-year on a like-for-like basis. In order to pay for the cost of the floor, we scale back the increase in grant above the floor for other authorities.
Since the introduction of multi-year settlements, we have used projected tax base data in the calculation of formula grant. The starting point for the tax base projections used in the current three-year settlement, covering 2008-09 to 2010-11, is the tax base as at 8 October 2007 adjusted for student exemptions. This is then increased annually by the Secretary of State’s estimate of the average annual increase in the tax base for the authority between 10 October 2005 and 8 October 2007.
The actual discount applied to long-term empty homes is applied for all authorities in calculating the tax base for the purposes of distributing formula grant. Any reduction in the discount applied to long-term empty homes commencing after 8 October 2007, will not be reflected in the projected taxbase calculations until the 2011-12 settlement.
Since 1 April 2004, although billing authorities have been able to reduce the council tax discount for second homes in their area (to between 10 and 50 per cent.), a discount of 50 per cent. has continued to be assumed for all authorities in calculating the tax base for the purposes of distributing formula grant.
Local Government: Public Consultation
I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave her on 7 May 2009, Official Report, column 396W.
Local Government: Reorganisation
The Department's running cost budget for 2009-10 includes provision of £1.57 million for work on local governance, including work on any reorganisations of local authorities. As required by the affordability criterion for the unitary bids, implementing the unitary proposals is self-financing, and the savings generated by the new unitary councils are available to be invested in front-line services or to reduce the pressure on council tax; hence, implementing a unitary council has no additional impact on departmental expenditure.
Local Government: Standards
The final results from the Comprehensive Performance Assessment (CPA) were published by the Audit Commission in March 2009. These showed the highest ever number of top-performing councils, with more than ever before assessed as ‘improving strongly’.
On 1 April we introduced the new system for assessment and inspection of local outcomes, Comprehensive Area Assessment (CAA), as part of the new local performance framework. CAA builds and improves on CPA, covering outcomes delivered by local authorities acting alone or in partnership, and is carried out jointly by six local public service inspectorates. The first CAA reports will be published in November 2009. For each local area the reports will comprise an area assessment—which looks at how well local public services are delivering local priorities and how likely they are to improve in the future—and organisational assessments of individual local public bodies, including local authorities.
Ahead of CAA, following sign-off of the new Local Area Agreements (LAAs) in June 2008, a review of local areas’ initial efforts to prepare for LAA delivery was carried out by the Government Offices earlier this year. The review indicated that local authorities and their partners were progressing well with their LAAs, with the vast majority of areas strengthening partnership and delivery arrangements to enhance their ability to meet improvement targets.
Where performance issues are not being addressed sufficiently quickly or effectively in local areas, Government Offices will work with local partners and central Government to provide challenge, broker appropriate action, and monitor improvement. This may range from additional support from the local government sector, to consultancy support, inspection, or ultimately formal intervention action.
As we indicated in our consultation document on Changing Council Governance Arrangements, we will produce a summary of responses within three months of the close of the consultation— 13 March 2009. This will be published on the Department’s website.
Non-Domestic Rates
No information is held centrally on individual businesses' bills; therefore the average change in business rates bills cannot be calculated.
The reduction in rate yield due to full rate increases being deferred for 2008-09 was £106 million. The net change in yield as a result of transitional relief in 2008-09 was £69.4 million. Data for 2009-10 are not yet available.
In 2009-10 businesses will be able to defer a proportion of their business rates bill increase. Following is a link to an announcement of the Government's plans for deferral, which includes an estimate of the cost of the proposal:
http://www.communities.gov.uk/news/localgovernment/1191049
This estimate will be updated in the impact assessment that will be undertaken and published as part of the process of making the necessary secondary legislation.
The numbers of hereditaments with a rateable value of less than £10,000, by Government office region, are shown in the following table.
Number North East 51,304 North West 158,285 Yorkshire and the Humber 116,216 East Midlands 87,298 West Midlands 117,324 East of England 110,438 London 138,639 South East 140,899 South West 127,573 Total England 1,047,976
The data are as at 31 March 2009 and are from the Valuation Office Agency.
The reduction in rate yield on the local list due to full rate increases being deferred for each year from 2005-06 is shown in the table:
Gross cost (£ million) 2005-061 1,167 2006-071 501 2007-081 230 2008-092 106 1 Data from NNDR 3: National Non-Domestic Rate Collection Yield Outturn returns 2 Data from NNDR 1: National Non-Domestic Rate Collection Yield Forecast returns
The 2010 business rates revaluation takes effect from 1 April 2010. We will publish a draft impact assessment alongside our proposals for transitional arrangements to phase in changes in rate bills as a result of the revaluation later in the summer.
The Government are currently considering the further detail and administrative arrangements for the business rates deferral scheme, working collaboratively with the local government sector and business to ensure ease of implementation.
The regulations authorising the scheme are planned to come into effect this summer and will set out in detail the application process and timetable. Businesses will be contacted by their billing authority and invited to apply for the scheme shortly after the regulations come into effect.
The Department has not made any further calculations of possible future revenues from supplementary business rates beyond those based on 2007 rateable values and published in Table 3.4 of Business Rate Supplements: A White Paper.
Rented Housing
No. Future rents policy is tied in with work currently being undertaken as part of the Review of Council Housing Finance.
Shops: Valuation
I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to the hon. Member for Brentwood and Ongar (Mr. Pickles) on 8 January 2008, Official Report, column 510W.
Culture, Media and Sport
Government Art Collection
[holding answer 27 April 2009]: The Government Art Collection comprises some 13,700 works of art. Its main purpose is to promote Britain by the acquisition and display of works of art (mostly by British artists) in the representational areas of major British Government buildings in the UK and abroad, where they are seen by thousands of visitors every year. At any one time some 70 per cent. of the collection is out on display, and the figures given here change on a daily basis.
The latest figures available are:
(a) 2,043 Government Art Collection (GAC) works of art in departmental offices.
(b) 560 in ministerial residences (including the whole of 10 and 11 Downing Street).
(c) 187 in offices of non-departmental public bodies and similar.
(d) 69 on loan to public galleries (including loans to temporary exhibitions).
(e) 5,404 in embassies overseas.
(f) 4,535 currently at the GAC's premises and available for selection and display; 470 of these were earmarked for specific locations (i.e. selected and awaiting installation). Of the rest, three were in commercial storage and 23 were being conserved and/or reframed.
(g) 912 displayed elsewhere (i.e. to organisations which do not fall into the categories a-f, such as in London: Lancaster House, Marlborough House and the Somerset House Trust; and abroad: the Offices of the Council of Europe in Paris and the European Commission Offices in Brussels).
Performing Arts: Discrimination
I have had no recent discussions of this nature. DCMS is committed to promoting equality of opportunity and we encourage our sectors to make the most of the full range of talent available to them.
Duchy of Lancaster
10 Downing Street: E-mail
The Prime Minister’s Office is an integral part of Cabinet Office and therefore follows its guidelines and policies in the use of ICT. The policy for the current Cabinet Office systems does not allow for any web- based e-mail accounts. Web-based e-mail accounts are permitted on a new pilot system, due to the increased security measures we are able to apply. If the system is rolled out, the Cabinet Office will reconsider its policy on web-based e-mails.
Census: Finance
The information requested falls within the responsibility of the UK Statistics Authority. I have asked the authority to reply.
Letter from Karen Dunnell, dated May 2009:
As National Statistician I have been asked to reply to your recent question asking what budget has been allocated to the generation of outputs from the 2011 Census. (274196)
The purpose of conducting a Census is to generate statistics and over the period 2005-2016 the budget for the Census as a whole is £482 million. Provision of £450 million for the cost of the Census has been made up to the period 2011-12. Of this £450 million, £7.5 million has been allocated to the early development of Census outputs. Provision for later years from 2012/13 will be subject to future spending reviews and will cover the final stages of data and output processing, preparing, publishing and disseminating outputs, and a number of subsequent output services and releases. This is set out in paragraphs 1.28 and 1.29 of the 2011 Census White Paper ‘Helping to shape tomorrow’ which was published in December 2008. A copy was placed in the House of Commons library and is also available on the website at
http://www.ons.gov.uk/census/2011-census/2011-census-project/legislation/index.html
Final decisions have not yet been made about how the statistics are disseminated. We are at present conducting consultation with census users on their requirements for types of statistics and area levels and the ways in which they will be made available.
Civil Servants: Pensions
In April each year the pensions, payable from the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme, of all former civil servants and their dependants are increased in line with inflation in accordance with the provisions of the Pensions Increase Act 1971 and Social Security Pensions Act 1975.
The Civil Service Pension Scheme is a statutory scheme and pensions are accordingly corrected when an under or overpayment is identified. I refer the hon. Member to the written statement I gave to the House on 16 December 2008.
Central management costs of the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme are met by appropriations in aid of the Cabinet Office from the accruing superannuation liability charges paid by employers. For financial years from 2001-02, these amounts are shown by way of note to the resource accounts for Cabinet Office: Civil Superannuation. The central administration costs for earlier years are:
£ million 2000-01 14.4 1999-2000 13.6 1998-99 13.5
Day-to-day administration costs are met by individual employers and details are not held centrally.
Figures are held centrally only in respect of early retirements on the grounds of ill-health. From 2006-07 these numbers are included in the resource accounts for Cabinet Office: Civil Superannuation. Copies of the resource accounts can be found in the Library and on the civil service pensions website at
www.civilservice.gov.uk/pensions
Figures for the earlier years are as follows:
Financial year Ill-health retirement applications approved 2003-04 1,343 2004-05 1,209 2005-06 1,135
On redundancies and early retirements other than those on the grounds of ill-health, I refer the hon. Member to the answer given in the other place to the noble Lord, Lord Laird, on 3 March 2009, Official Report, House of Lords, columns WA 134-35.
The terms payable in respect of early retirements on the grounds of ill-health are set out in the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme, a statutory scheme made under the Superannuation Act 1972. The rules of the scheme can be found on the Civil Service Pensions website at:
www.civilservice.gov.uk/pensions
Employing Departments are responsible for meeting the full costs of early retirements of civil servants other than those on the grounds of ill-health. The annual cost of pension payments made before the scheme’s pension age in respect of such early retirements is contained in Cabinet Office: Civil Superannuation Resource Accounts (in the note to the accounts entitled “Revenue account—CSCS compensation agency arrangements”). Copies of the resource accounts can be found in the Library and on the civil service pensions website at:
www.civilservice.gov.uk/pensions
The annual cost of pension payments made before the scheme’s pension age in respect of early retirements on the grounds of ill-health is not recorded separately. However, each year, the resource accounts of each employing department give details of the total additional annual pension granted to any of their employees who retired on the grounds of ill-health during that year.
[holding answer 11 May 2009]: As at 7 May 2009 the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme is paying 52,741 pensioners a gross pension between £2000 and £3000; 46,257 pensioners a pension between £3,000 and £4,000, and 37,644 pensioners a pension between £4,000 and £5,000 per annum. "Pensioners" includes retired officers but not those in receipt of a dependant's pension.
Civil Servants: Redundancy
I refer the hon. Member to the statement made by the Prime Minister on 31 March 2009, Official Report, column 60-61WS.
Civil Service
The Civil Service Code is kept under review and is updated as and when required.
Copies of the Civil Service Code are available in the Library of the House and available at
http://www.civilservice.gov.uk/Assets/cs_code_tcm6-2444.pdf
Departmental Contracts for Services
Information regarding contracts for the provision of estates management and corporately provided information and communications technology (ICT) which have been outsourced over the past five years, and the year that they were outsourced, are as follows:
Telephone service management (2007);
Security guarding services, not previously outsourced (2007).
Centrally held records do not show any other services being outsourced over that period.
Departmental Correspondence
The complaints handling procedure for the Cabinet Office is available on the Cabinet Office website at:
http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/ContactUs/Complaints.aspx
A copy has been placed in the Library of the House.
Departmental ICT
The majority of servers used by my Department are supplied under our current ICT contract by Fujitsu services. The Cabinet Office possesses fileserver storage used mainly for the storage of documents and databases. The amount used over the past four years is as follows:
2005 2006 2007 2008 Data Size (GB) 2,481 3,814 4,700 5,400 Utilisation (percentage) 30 46 57 65
We have no information about the server capacity utilisation in 2004.
The Department also has a small number of servers used for the operation of its e-mail system. The volatile nature of the e-mail traffic and the need to keep real-time backups, mean that these servers provide optimum performance at less than 20 per cent. capacity.
The Department has recently instituted a policy of moving to storage area networking (SAN) devices. These allow several applications to share a server and so make much more efficient use of its capacity. Our current SAN has a utilisation rate of 80 per cent.
On 17 July 2008, I launched the Greening Government ICT Strategy. Its aim is to reduce the environmental impact of the computer systems employed by all Government bodies. In the strategy, one important target is to reduce the overall number of printers used by an organisation and replace them with multi-function devices (MFDs) where security issues allow. The MFDs should use green printing defaults wherever possible.
The Department has used the following number of multi-function devices with printing functions and printers during the past five years.
December MFDs Printers 2008 147 164 2007 167 161 2006 156 150 2005 149 133 2004 128 127
All multi-functional devices are capable of two-sided printing, and indeed are set up to do so as the default.
Since 2003, my Department has had a policy of installing multi-user MFDs as the main device for printing. A number of printers have been retained, but they are only used where there are specific business reasons.
Departmental Mobile Phones
The number of mobile phones purchased by the Cabinet Office in each year since 2005 are shown as follows:
Number 2005 219 2006 242 2007 226 2008 235
At April 2009 the Cabinet Office has 198 BlackBerrys in use. Records of when these were purchased are not held centrally so the information requested can be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Our records do not differentiate between mobile devices supplied to Ministers, special advisers and civil servants.
The Prime Minister’s Office is an integral part of the Cabinet Office.
Departmental Official Hospitality
Information relating to spend on conference and banqueting services is not held centrally and therefore is available only at disproportionate cost.
Departmental Safety
Information relating to spend on health and safety for each of the last five years is not held centrally and therefore is available only at disproportionate cost.
Government Departments: Data Protection
All communications services providers supplying services to Government must comply with the appropriate security standards as determined by Government Departments in their information risk management and protective security policies.
Regular discussions take place between Ministers and officials across government as appropriate to address information security and assurance requirements and policies for Government.
Government Departments: Press Releases
All Government communications activity is subject to strict propriety guidance, which, along with the Civil Service Code, defines how civil servants can properly and effectively present Government policies and programmes.
Copies of the communication propriety guidance have been placed in the Library of the House, copies of the Civil Service Code are available in the Library of the House and can be found at:
http://www.civilservice.gov.uk/Assets/cs_code_tcm6-2444.pdf
Local Government: Standards
Cabinet Office is the owner of the customer service excellence and charter mark schemes. Cabinet Office licenses four independent certification bodies to provide assessment processes for customer service excellence and charter mark. The certification bodies are the sole decision makers in the process of certifying organisations as CSE or charter mark holders. They manage all matters relating to the ongoing suitability and status of holders in local government and other sectors.
Ministers: Costs
[holding answer 7 May 2009]: Instruction on the reporting of the remuneration of Government Ministers is set out by HM Treasury in the Government Financial Reporting Manual (FReM). Under this guidance, information on ministerial salaries is provided in the remuneration section of Departments' annual Resource Accounts, copies of which are in the Library of the House.
Ministers: Data Protection
It is for individual Departments to collate information on security breaches within their Departments.
Pensions
Pensions and other benefits paid from the pension schemes concerned are accounted for in the annual Resource Accounts for the schemes. Resource Accounts for the year 2009-10 will be published following the end of the year in question.
Strategy Committee
There is no such committee within the Cabinet Office.
Electoral Commission Committee
Electoral Register
The Commission informs me that it has made no estimate of the proportion of unregistered voters who are functionally illiterate.
However, the Commission’s 2005 report, “Understanding electoral registration”, found a correlation between under-registration and those with no educational qualifications. This correlation is more pronounced for the younger age groups, with non-registration approximately 8 per cent. among 18 to 34-year-olds who hold some form of educational qualification and 15 per cent. for those reporting no qualifications.
The Commission informs me that it issues guidance to electoral registration officers (EROs) on providing assistance to people with low levels of literacy, and that it includes as part of its performance standards framework a requirement that EROs ensure that the registration process is straightforward and accessible for electors.
The Commission provides materials to help EROs and community groups to communicate with people with literacy or learning difficulties, and also funds, through its partnership grants programme, projects to increase registration among people with learning disabilities.
Local Government: Suffolk
The Electoral Commission informs me that the Boundary Committee considered that an East Suffolk/West Suffolk/Ipswich pattern would, on the basis of the information before it, be unlikely to have the capacity to deliver the outcomes specified by the Secretary of State's five criteria.
The Electoral Commission informs me that in its further draft proposal report the Boundary Committee outlined potential arrangements to deliver the outcomes specified by the Secretary of State's five criteria.
One of these arrangements is for a pattern of “service delivery villages”. These are centres typically providing shared local offices for public sector service providers, intended to encourage shared solutions to local problems. In pattern A, which is a unitary county authority, the committee proposed locating the public service villages in the three largest towns: Ipswich, Bury St. Edmunds and Lowestoft. In pattern B, the committee requested views on whether the town of Stowmarket would be an appropriate location for a public service village, serving residents living in the centre of Suffolk, bearing in mind that Ipswich would be included in a separate unitary authority.
The Electoral Commission informs me that its Boundary Committee has not determined Lowestoft to be either an urban area or a market town for the purposes of its further draft proposals for unitary local government in Suffolk. It is not the committee's remit to decide how an area should be defined.
Energy and Climate Change
British Nuclear Fuels
I have been asked to reply.
In line with the company's standard terms of employment, the outgoing chief executive of BNFL, Mike Parker CBE, is entitled to a redundancy payment equivalent to one times his basic salary. There are no other severance related payments due to him. There are no BNFL pension arrangements for Mike Parker; he does not participate in the BNFL pension scheme and the company has not made contributions to any other pension scheme on his behalf.
Government Departments: Carbon Emissions
I have been asked to reply.
The Government Chief Information Officer Council is co-ordinating measures to implement the Greening Government ICT Strategy published last July. The strategy includes early actions to increase the average server capacity utilisation, which will reduce the overall level of carbon dioxide emissions in data centres and accord with the European Code of Conduct. The CIO Council are also working with the Public Sector Council of Intellect, the trade association for the high technology industries, on a forward strategy for Government data centres to reduce costs and carbon emissions.
Winter Fuel Payments
I have been asked to reply.
The information requested is not available.
Winter fuel payments are made to people aged 60 or over, including those who are disabled. We do not collect statistics on the number of people aged below 60 with spinal cord injuries.
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Flood Control
(2) what the membership of the National Resilience Forum on Flooding is; and if he will make a statement.
I have been asked to reply.
The National Resilience Forum has not yet met. In December, in the Government’s reply to Sir Michael Pitt’s Review, we said that the aim would be for an inaugural meeting in the first half of 2009. The National Security Forum has since met for the first time, in March, which has helped us review proposals for the National Resilience Forum. Detailed proposals and the issue of invitations will commence as soon as possible after this review is complete.
Floods: Property Development
The Environment Agency has advised that the number of planning applications given planning permission against its advice on flood risk grounds over the past five years, and the number of local planning authorities (LPAs) this represented, is as follows:
Total number of planning applications permitted against Environment Agency advice on flood risk Total number of LPAs granting planning permission against an Environment Agency flood risk objection 2003-04 323 85 2004-05 248 108 2005-06 136 82 2006-07 110 72 2007-08 124 76
Planning policy statement (PPS) 25, ‘Development and Flood Risk’, was published in December 2006. Prior to that date, national planning policy on development and flood risk was set out in planning policy guidance note 25. These policies apply only to England.
It is for the local planning authority to determine planning applications in accordance with the development plan for the area, taking account of the particular circumstances of each application and subject to other material planning considerations.
Further detailed information about the extent to which local planning authorities have taken account of the Environment Agency’s advice on flood risk is set out in the Environment Agency’s annual ‘Development and Flood Risk’ monitoring report. The most recent report was published in February 2009, covering the period 2007-08. This shows that where flood risk was an issue, around 96 per cent. of all planning application decisions, as notified to the Environment Agency, were in line with the Environment Agency’s advice.
Hydroelectric Power: Licensing
The number of abstraction licence applications received and new abstraction licences granted for hydropower schemes are given in the following table. The Environment Agency introduced a national Water Resources authorisations receipt tracking system in November 2008. As a result, data on the number of applications received and refused are only available from November 2008 onwards. Prior to this, information was not held centrally. To collate pre-2008 data would incur disproportionate costs.
England Wales England Wales England Wales 2006 n/a n/a n/a n/a 11 0 2007 n/a n/a n/a n/a 4 2 2008 4 0 0 0 10 1 2009 13 0 0 0 7 0
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
1 Carlton Gardens
The ministerial residence within 1 Carlton Gardens has not been used since 16 October 2007 but the Foreign and Commonwealth Office uses the function rooms of 1 Carlton Gardens for a range of events hosted by Ministers and senior officials, as well as other departmental meetings.
Afghanistan: Peacekeeping Operations
[holding answer 7 May 2009]: My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary last discussed the situation in North West Frontier province with Foreign Minister Qureshi on 25 April 2009. As part of our wider defence engagement programme, we will continue our efforts to build the capacity of the Pakistani military to mount effective operations that minimise civilian casualties. The UK is also helping the Government of Pakistan to meet the urgent humanitarian needs of those most directly affected by insecurity. We have so far dispersed £2 million and have recently committed an additional £10 million. Our funds are being channelled through humanitarian agencies on the ground to give food supplies and shelter to those most in need, as well as supplying essential water and sanitation and basic health care.
US actions should be discussed between the US and Pakistani Governments. We cannot comment on intelligence matters.
Any such deployments would be for discussion between the US and Pakistani Governments.
I refer the hon. Member to the answer my hon. Friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Gillian Merron) gave on 26 November 2008, Official Report, columns 1795-1796W.
British Indian Ocean Territory: Nature Conservation
The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) and the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT) Administration are committed to high standards of environmental protection in BIOT. There is a legislative framework, protection of sites and species of particular importance, and designated reserves (an area of Diego Garcia has been designated as a Wetland of International Importance under the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands). These have contributed to the very high levels of nature conservation achieved in the territory.
The FCO and BIOT Administration are keen to explore options for further enhancing levels of environmental protection in BIOT and welcome the interest expressed, for example, by the Chagos Environment Network who have recently proposed the establishment of a large-scale Marine Protected Area.
These issues have not been the subject of discussion with ministerial colleagues, but FCO officials have been asked to engage with officials in other Government Departments.
Colombia: Foreign Relations
The UK maintains a constructive partnership with Colombia, working with the Colombian Government, international and civil society partners on a number of shared challenges including human rights, counter-narcotics, impunity and climate change.
My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary gave a written ministerial statement on UK policy towards Colombia on 30 March 2009, Official Report, column 40WS, which outlined changes to the way we deliver our objectives in Colombia, including giving priority to tackling impunity in the criminal justice system, and promoting the work of human rights and civil society organisations in Colombia.
Conflict Resolution
[holding answer 8 May 2009]: The right hon. Jack McConnell MSP, the Prime Minister’s Special Representative on Conflict Resolution Mechanisms has made a valuable contribution to advancing the UK’s peace building objectives since his appointment in October 2008. He has in particular engaged with the UN Secretariat and key stakeholders around the world to press for an ambitious UN Secretary-General report on peace building in the immediate aftermath of conflict.
Democratic Republic of Congo: Security
Over the last month the security situation in South Kivu has remained tense. Joint operations by the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) military and UN peacekeepers against the Rwandan Hutu Democratic Liberation Forces of Rwanda (FDLR) militia have begun. For the time being, the FDLR continues to pose a serious threat to the civilian population in South Kivu, and to commit atrocities in eastern DRC.
I welcome the effort to apply pressure to the FDLR. We are providing support to help FDLR fighters who wish to leave the organisation to do so. Former members of other militias in South Kivu are entering into a process of integration into the DRC army.
Departmental Mobile Phones
We do not keep a record of the number of devices lost on a yearly basis.
Departmental Public Expenditure
The following table gives net administration allocations by post for 2007-08 and 2008-09. Programme allocations are not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Net budget Post name 2007-08 2008-09 Abu Dhabi 1,572,681 1,752,716 Abuja 3,554,614 5,020,710 Accra 3,086,040 3,257,524 Addis Ababa 1,171,123 1,329,804 Alexandria 202,731 238,579 Algiers 1,533,265 2,188,879 Amman 2,017,393 3,067,325 Amsterdam 834,716 779,968 Anguilla — 299,755 Ankara 2,948,293 4,465,499 Ashgabat 319,179 414,932 Asmara 124,650 183,269 Astana 851,062 1,115,209 Athens 3,270,021 3,830,127 Auckland 377,800 377,806 Baghdad 26,584,327 2,673,946 Bahrain 653,994 883,516 Baku 784,919 1,137,164 Bandar Seri Begawan 493,331 725,516 Bangkok 2,071,120 2,818,570 Banjul 503,026 562,103 Basra 6,800,947 1,426,582 Beirut 1,486,136 2,022,993 Belgrade 1,926,599 2,561,436 Belmopan 996,494 1,036,158 Berlin 9,619,290 11,174,075 Berne 2,080,823 3,022,511 Bogota 1,791,605 2,288,380 Bordeaux 92,591 87,580 Brasilia 2,820,941 4,511,063 Bratislava 720,791 846,555 Bridgetown 989,862 1,202,104 Brisbane 346,801 432,226 Brussels 1,759,722 1,769,060 Brussels Jmo 1,545,524 2,108,133 Brussels Ukdel 1,230,250 1,273,536 Brussels Ukrep 4,722,787 5,428,993 Bucharest 1,696,001 2,024,966 Budapest 1,769,921 2,084,513 Buenos Aires 1,992,059 2,285,505 Cairo 1,681,938 2,185,528 Canberra 3,826,469 4,708,828 Cape Town 667,062 698,572 Caracas 1,314,228 1,798,230 Castries 76,124 122,533 Chennai 1,118,356 1,175,587 Chisinau 383,987 442,085 Chongqing 701,261 761,355 Colombo (inc. Maldives) 983,532 1,198,960 Copenhagen (inc. Torshavn) 2,818,761 3,525,259 Dakar 404,312 521,654 Damascus 748,137 1,200,735 Dar Es Salaam 783,804 928,956 Dhaka 2,251,636 2,399,027 Doha 1,196,202 1,798,694 Dubai 2,469,473 3,266,203 Dublin 2,686,160 3,035,020 Dushanbe 426,892 555,239 Dusseldorf 3,171,526 3,781,535 Ekaterinburg 282,226 302,869 Erbil — 140,569 Freetown 1,108,162 1,289,409 Gaborone 207,884 257,933 Geneva 2,785,634 3,760,260 Georgetown 555,005 601,409 Gibraltar 1,269,485 1,079,654 Grand Cayman 226,174 151,865 Grand Turk 305,617 317,317 Guangzhou 1,413,497 2,097,406 Guatemala City 1,010,725 730,975 Hanoi 611,542 728,040 Harare 1,487,040 1,815,506 Havana 1,080,012 1,158,045 Helsinki 1,809,797 2,087,428 Ho Chi Minh City 331,617 515,784 Hong Kong CG 4,639,855 4,705,475 Honiara 158,607 176,287 Islamabad 3,848,446 3,934,619 Istanbul 2,992,285 2,055,233 Jakarta 1,999,872 2,270,617 Jeddah 902,238 0 Jerusalem 1,349,103 1,938,662 Johannesburg 842,801 1,007,857 Kabul 12,169,820 19,635,051 Kampala 1,588,297 1,423,909 Karachi 822,293 851,778 Kathmandu 707,020 757,460 Khartoum 2,193,939 3,780,923 Kiev 1,489,357 2,365,230 Kigali 520,046 509,329 Kingston 1,787,526 2,640,442 Kinshasa 1,165,842 1,677,009 Kirkuk 1,390,059 0 Kolkata 321,640 300,305 Kuala Lumpur 1,636,764 2,182,163 Kuwait 1,569,723 2,278,500 La Paz 345,724 482,107 Lagos (inc. Cotonou) 5,514,863 7,115,131 Lille 101,438 119,466 Lilongwe (inc. Blantyre) 488,178 497,066 Lima 1,117,531 1,486,548 Lisbon 2,139,305 2,489,812 Ljubljana 679,431 804,564 Luanda 1,205,953 1,421,398 Lusaka 898,246 1,019,562 Luxembourg 581,764 538,044 Lyon 80,207 88,686 Madrid 7,728,424 9,386,780 Manila 1,829,679 2,016,352 Maputo 786,037 789,291 Marseilles 77,506 63,600 Melbourne 590,268 739,641 Mexico City 2,818,773 2,912,994 Minsk 220,814 273,281 Montevideo 546,380 1,244,751 Montreal 278,223 173,676 Moscow 6,181,190 7,149,679 Mumbai 1,557,814 2,000,928 Munich 954,763 1,000,437 Muscat 1,097,759 1,521,012 Nairobi 2,824,968 3,328,947 New Delhi 7,447,508 7,824,391 New York Cg 2,361,293 0 Nicosia 2,195,677 2,922,541 Osaka 1,184,605 1,870,801 Oslo 2,047,093 2,327,855 Ottawa 3,696,031 3,257,247 Panama City 413,424 609,718 Paris 10,746,611 13,302,223 Peking (Beijing) 4,773,854 6,313,945 Perth 248,474 338,546 Phnom Penh 326,998 463,172 Plymouth 310,536 279,616 Podgorica — 255,393 Port Louis 370,368 476,964 Port Moresby 299,819 490,659 Port Of Spain 1,138,262 1,188,935 Prague 1,582,009 2,073,835 Pretoria 2,737,135 3,744,963 Pristina 532,812 704,319 Pyongyang 189,743 220,053 Quito 444,535 544,209 Rabat 1,739,766 2,209,227 Rangoon 567,660 766,378 Reykjavik 507,994 415,063 Riga 576,851 782,674 Rio De Janeiro 1,176,852 1,671,389 Riyadh 2,256,078 4,218,700 Rome 7,280,184 8,979,533 San Jose 304,663 589,949 Sana'a 1,449,958 1,374,296 Santiago 1,183,681 1,940,182 Santo Domingo 291,616 392,158 Sao Paulo 1,785,853 2,541,755 Sarajevo 858,826 974,585 Seoul 2,856,603 2,833,744 Shanghai 1,617,187 2,092,390 Singapore 2,322,457 3,225,627 Skopje 617,985 812,888 Sofia 1,070,516 1,113,034 St. George's 64,829 20,000 St. John's 132,290 66,409 St. Petersburg 828,538 972,984 Stanley 103,220 251,653 Stockholm 2,264,286 2,768,901 Strasbourg 201,803 216,288 Suva 590,919 674,896 Sydney 1,435,245 1,473,760 Taipei Btco 1,256,380 1,347,774 Tallinn 626,126 890,640 Tashkent 643,125 738,165 Tbilisi 607,777 905,533 Tehran 2,419,129 3,067,194 Tel Aviv 2,026,430 2,676,651 The Hague 2,377,310 2,481,914 Tirana 552,704 567,072 Tokyo 7,590,776 9,319,443 Toronto 1,169,826 1,256,037 Tortola 474,129 281,621 Tripoli 2,034,987 2,174,438 Tunis 814,700 980,533 UKMis New York 3,781,613 4,449,125 Ulaanbaatar 253,919 170,803 Valletta 695,316 804,351 Vancouver 375,147 647,884 Victoria 247,500 198,928 Vienna 3,488,089 3,959,201 Vilnius 626,692 859,001 Warsaw 2,180,512 2,535,063 Washington 17,375,714 23,212,645 Wellington 1,620,198 1,647,447 Windhoek 299,991 262,758 Yaounde 637,766 733,532 Yerevan 385,782 532,762 Zagreb 1,016,346 1,223,445