The Treasury is considering carefully the Treasury Select Committee’s recommendations and expects to respond to them in due course.
On 8 October HM Government made the Landsbanki Freezing Order 2008. The order was made because the Icelandic Government, its authorities and Landsbanki appeared to be on the brink of action which would be to the detriment of the UK economy, including detrimental treatment of UK depositors.
It is a measure that could be lifted once the Treasury is satisfied that action to the detriment of the UK economy has been addressed and will not proceed.
Treasury Ministers receive advice and input on a wide range of issues, from a variety of individuals and organisations in the public and private sectors, as part of the process of policy development and analysis. As was the case with previous Administrations, it is not the Government’s practice to provide details of advice given to the Treasury.
Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander (KSF) the UK subsidiary of the Icelandic bank Kaupthing was regulated by the FSA, who was also in regular contact with the Icelandic regulator, FME.
As KSF’s position deteriorated the tripartite authorities worked intensively to find solutions to the firm’s problems. On 8 October the FSA decided that KSF no longer met the FSA’s threshold conditions and the firm went into administration.
Upon learning of the FSA’s decision, the UK Government moved swiftly to transfer some of the deposits of KSF to ING to safeguard depositors and financial stability within the UK.
The steps taken by the FSA and the Government had no bearing on the status of the parent company, Kaupthing Bank hf, which is incorporated under Icelandic law and subject to supervision by the FME.
The power under section 4 of the Anti Terrorism Crime and Security Act 2001 has been used on one occasion. This was in 2008 for the Landsbanki Freezing Order.
Treasury Ministers and officials have meetings and discussions with a wide variety of organisations in the public and private sectors as part of the process of policy development and delivery. As was the case with previous Administrations, it is not the Government's practice to provide details of all such meetings and discussions.