Skip to main content

Children: Social Services

Volume 497: debated on Thursday 22 October 2009

To ask the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families if he will list serious case reviews which have been performed following the death of a child since 2005, citing only the month and year of the death, the local authority with jurisdiction and a reference code. (292358)

In April 2007 Ofsted assumed responsibility for the inspection of children's social care and local authorities became responsible for notifying Ofsted of serious incidents involving children. The Department for Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) developed a new database to hold information on such incidents, and data on the numbers of Serious Case Reviews (SCRs) following the notification of a death or serious injury of a child are available from 1 April 2007.

A previous parliamentary answer—23 February 2009, Official Report, column 442W—indicated that, of all notifications received between 1 April 2007 and 31 March 2008 of serious child care incidents, 89 SCRs had been initiated where a child died and abuse or neglect was known or suspected to be a factor.

Data currently held by the Department as at 8 October 2009 indicate that, of all notifications received between 1 April 2008 and 31 March 2009 of serious child care incidents, 75 SCRs had been initiated where a child died and abuse or neglect was known or suspected to be a factor.

A further three incidents are awaiting a decision. These figures are broken down by local authority in the following table along with the data from the previous parliamentary answer.

The decision about whether to undertake an SCR can change as more information about the case becomes available, for example, through inquests in to the cause of death. Therefore, the data given in this and the previous answer are likely to change slightly over time.

It is not possible to give information broken down by the date of death (by month) because this would significantly increase the risk that individual children and their families might be identified and could prejudice the interests and safety of children and their families.

Local authority

Number of Serious Case Reviews commissioned as a result of a child death, notified between 1 April 2007 and 31 March 20081

Number of Serious Case Reviews commissioned as a result of a child death, notified between 1 April 2008 and 31 March 20092

North East

Darlington

0

0

Durham

0

2

Gateshead

0

0

Hartlepool

0

1

Middlesbrough

0

0

Newcastle upon Tyne

2

0

North Tyneside

0

1

Northumberland

0

1

Redcar and Cleveland

1

0

South Tyneside

3

0

Stockton-on-Tees

0

0

Sunderland

0

0

North West

Blackburn with Darwen

2

0

Blackpool

0

0

Bolton

0

0

Bury

0

0

Cheshire

0

2

Cumbria

0

0

Halton

1

1

Knowsley

1

0

Lancashire

1

3

Liverpool

2

1

Manchester

2

2

Oldham

0

0

Rochdale

0

0

Salford

0

1

Sefton

0

0

St Helens

1

0

Stockport

1

0

Tameside

0

0

Trafford

0

0

Warrington

0

0

Wigan

0

1

Wirral

0

0

Yorks and the Humber

Barnsley

0

0

Bradford

0

0

Calderdale

2

0

Doncaster

3

2

East Riding of Yorkshire

0

0

Kingston Upon Hull, City of

1

0

Kirklees

1

2

Leeds

4

2

North East Lincolnshire

1

0

North Lincolnshire

0

0

North Yorkshire

1

0

Rotherham

0

1

Sheffield

3

0

Wakefield

1

1

York

0

0

East Midlands

Derby

0

0

Derbyshire

1

0

Leicester

3

0

Leicestershire

0

1

Lincolnshire

0

0

Northamptonshire

0

1

Nottingham

2

2

Nottinghamshire

1

0

Rutland

0

0

West Midlands

Birmingham

2

5

Coventry

2

1

Dudley

1

0

Herefordshire

1

1

Sandwell

2

1

Shropshire

1

1

Solihull

0

0

Staffordshire

1

0

Stoke-on-Trent

0

0

Telford and Wrekin

0

0

Walsall

0

0

Warwickshire

0

0

Wolverhampton

1

1

Worcestershire

2

2

East of England

Bedfordshire

0

0

Cambridgeshire

2

1

Essex

1

0

Hertfordshire

0

3

Luton

1

0

Norfolk

2

0

Peterborough

0

1

Southend-on-Sea

0

0

Suffolk

2

0

Thurrock

1

0

London

Inner London

Camden

0

0

City of London

0

0

Hackney

0

1

Hammersmith and Fulham

1

0

Haringey

1

0

Islington

0

0

Kensington and Chelsea

0

0

Lambeth

0

0

Lewisham

0

1

Newham

0

2

Southwark

2

0

Tower Hamlets

1

0

Wandsworth

0

0

Westminster

0

1

Outer London

Barking and Dagenham

1

0

Barnet

1

1

Bexley

0

2

Brent

0

0

Bromley

0

1

Croydon

2

0

Ealing

0

0

Enfield

0

1

Greenwich

0

1

Harrow

0

0

Havering

0

1

Hillingdon

0

0

Hounslow

0

0

Kingston upon Thames

0

0

Merton

0

0

Redbridge

1

1

Richmond upon Thames

0

0

Sutton

0

1

Waltham Forest

1

0

South East

Bracknell Forest

0

0

Brighton and Hove

0

0

Buckinghamshire

1

2

East Sussex

0

1

Hampshire

0

1

Isle of Wight

1

0

Kent

2

2

Medway

0

1

Milton Keynes

1

0

Oxfordshire

0

1

Portsmouth

1

0

Reading

0

1

Slough

0

1

Southampton

1

0

Surrey

1

0

West Berkshire

1

0

West Sussex

0

0

Windsor and Maidenhead

0

0

Wokingham

0

0

South West

Bath and North East Somerset

0

0

Bournemouth

0

0

Bristol, City of

1

0

Cornwall

1

1

Devon

2

0

Dorset

0

1

Gloucestershire

1

2

Isles of Scilly

0

0

North Somerset

0

1

Plymouth

0

0

Poole

0

1

Somerset

1

0

South Gloucestershire

0

0

Swindon

0

0

Torbay

0

0

Wiltshire

0

0

89

75

1 Information from previous parliamentary answer (Official Report 23 February 2009, column 442W

2 There are three cases which await a decision)