Community Development: Expenditure

Justine Greening

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much funding has been granted under the Neighbourhood Management Pathfinders in each (a) local authority and (b) lower super output area in each year since 2000. (318211)

The following table shows amounts committed under the Neighbourhood Management Pathfinder programme, which began in 2002-03. Funding is provided as part of local authority area based grant, a non ring-fenced funding stream, therefore we do not hold information on funding at lower super output area level.

Neighbourhood Management Pathfinders	Region	2002-03	2003-04	2004-05	2005-06	2006-07	2007-08	2008-09	2009-10	2010-11	Total
Round one
Ashfield	EM	0.755	0.844	0.786	0.605	0.323	0.323	0.323	—	—	3.959
Barnsley	YH	0.272	0.393	0.625	0.620	0.870	0.620	0.278	—	—	3.678
Basildon	E	0.411	0.359	0.601	0.739	0.450	0.450	0.250	—	—	3.260
Bolton	NW	0.598	0.525	0.742	0.970	0.606	0.434	0.047	—	—	3.922
Bournemouth	SW	0.357	0.428	0.656	0.735	0.639	0.406	0.290	—	—	3.511
Burton	WM	0.287	0.512	0.576	0.605	0.701	0.491	0.354	—	—	3.526
Camden	L	0.446	0.535	1.039	0.600	0.300	0.256	0.216	—	—	3.392
Chester	NW	0.322	0.471	0.810	0.800	0.660	0.200	0.200	—	—	3.463
Derwentside	NE	0.233	0.63	0.789	0.811	0.592	0.378	0.257	—	—	3.690
Easington	NE	0.372	0.35	0.753	0.882	0.340	0.220	0.200	—	—	3.117
Gloucester	SW	0.147	0.556	0.558	0.737	0.696	0.417	0.295	—	—	3.406
Greenwich	L	0.444	0.46	0.640	0.620	0.550	0.450	0.370	—	—	3.534
Hastings	SE	0.275	0.614	0.645	0.530	0.470	0.440	0.266	—	—	3.240
Kirklees	YH	0.577	0.604	0.647	0.637	0.600	0.500	0.203	—	—	3.768
Newcastle-under-Lyme	WM	0.322	0.562	0.652	0.586	0.379	0.378	0.378	—	—	3.257
Poulton	NW	0.584	0.258	0.897	0.800	0.439	0.343	0.264	—	—	3.585
Rotherham	YH	0.44	0.309	0.552	0.565	0.839	0.610	0.207	—	—	3.522
Staveley	EM	0.321	0.62	0.680	0.668	0.381	0.381	0.381	—	—	3.432
Stockton-on-Tees	NE	0.545	0.625	0.833	0.657	0.477	0.386	0.263	—	—	3.786
Tameside	NW	0.483	0.475	0.725	0.900	0.489	0.512	0.077	—	—	3.661

Round two
Bassetlaw	EM	—	—	0.260	0.350	0.358	0.391	0.349	0.337	0.295	2.340
Blackburn with Darwen	NW	—	—	0.203	0.316	0.373	0.382	0.350	0.341	0.334	2.299
Blyth Valley	NE	—	—	0.081	0.400	0.434	0.379	0.405	0.312	0.290	2.301
Calderdale	YH	—	—	0.241	0.291	0.332	0.344	0.357	0.353	0.345	2.263
Fenland	E	—	—	0.260	0.568	0.354	0.354	0.354	0.354	0.354	2.598
Isle of Wight Council	SE	—	—	0.243	0.309	0.426	0.415	0.370	0.320	0.300	2.383
North Devon	SW	—	—	0.333	0.334	0.364	0.367	0.387	0.330	0.295	2.410
North Lincolnshire	YH	—	—	0.269	0.392	0.350	0.350	0.350	0.350	0.350	2.411
Shepway	SE	—	—	0.266	0.244	0.330	0.345	0.378	0.378	0.378	2.319
Solihull	WM	—	—	0.254	0.449	0.330	0.330	0.330	0.330	0.330	2.353
Southwark	L	—	—	0.222	0.270	0.408	0.396	0.349	0.347	0.350	2.342
Waltham Forest	L	—	—	0.286	0.300	0.347	0.347	0.347	0.347	0.347	2.321
Westminster	L	—	—	0.256	0.300	0.350	0.350	0.350	0.350	0.341	2.297
Wirral	NW	—	—	0.219	0.265	0.350	0.350	0.350	0.350	0.350	2.234
Wyre Forest	WM	—	—	0.318	0.444	0.418	0.348	0.522	0.310	0.234	2.594
Total		8.191	10.130	17.917	19.299	16.325	13.643	10.667	5.109	4.893	106.174

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much funding has been granted under the European Regional Development Fund in each (a) local authority and (b) lower super output area in each year since 2000. (318213)

European Regional Development Fund grants are paid to a wide range of public and private sector applicants. Furthermore, they are not restricted to either local authority or lower super output areas and may cover the whole or part of an ERDF programme area, including several local authorities.

It would therefore be a disproportionate cost to my Department to produce this information for each local authority and lower super output area.

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much funding has been granted under the Single Regeneration Budget in each (a) local authority and (b) lower super output area in each year since 2000. (318215)

The SRJB was allocated to Government offices (GOs) and regional development agencies (RDAs) giving them the authority, freedom and flexibility to best determine the local needs and options through a bidding process. Information is therefore not available for how this was applied to each local authority or each lower super output area (LSOA).

The table shows total SRB expenditure for the six rounds of the programme was £5.7 billion.

GO/RDA	SRB (£ million)
East of England	136.7
East Midlands	283.8
London	1,519.60
North East	650.2
North West	1,085.50
South East	349.4
South West	168.1
West Midlands	630.6
Yorkshire/Humberside	879.5
Total	5,703.40

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how much funding has been granted under the Land and Property Programme in each (a) local authority and (b) lower super output area in each year since 2000. (318217)

The Land and Property Programme funding was allocated to eligible local authorities giving them the authority, freedom and flexibility to best determine the local needs and options. Information is therefore not available on how this was applied to each Lower Layer Super Output Area (LSOA).

I have placed in the Library of the House, a table which records the allocation for each local authority area in England from 2000-01 to 2008-09.

Volume 506: debated on Monday 1 March 2010