House of Commons Hansard
25 March 2010
Volume 508
The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.
(2) how many (a) reparation, (b) action plan, (c) attendance centre, (d) curfew orders with conditions and (e) supervision orders were (i) issued for each reason to and (ii) breached by offenders aged (A) 12, (B) 13, (C) 14, (D) 15, (E) 16, (F) 17, (G) 18 and (H) 19 years old in each London borough in each year since 2002.
The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.
I have been asked to reply.
The available information is provided in the following table.
Data for 2009 will be available when Sentencing Statistics 2009 is published later this year.
The Court Proceedings database does not have data by boroughs. The information provided is for the London criminal justice area.
Due to data quality issues we are unable to provide information on breaches from the Courts Proceeding database. Work is currently under way to resolve this.
The Courts Proceeding database does not record information on reasons why these orders have been issued, other than the offence committed.
The figures referred to in the response relate to stand alone community sentences only. Requirements similar to those of the stand alone orders which have been given as part of the generic Community Order are not included. The Community Order, brought in by the Criminal Justice Act 2003 is available for offenders 18 and over and whose offence was committed from April 2005.
The community rehabilitation order and the standalone curfew order were replaced by the community order under the Criminal Justice Act 2003, from April 2005 for offenders over 18.
Community rehabilitation orders do not apply to offenders aged under 16.
Action plan order and reparation orders apply for offenders aged under 18.
Types of community sentences Age 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Community Rehabilitation Order 12 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 13 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 14 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 15 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 16 61 29 64 62 39 58 73 17 237 183 173 207 144 185 216 18 390 291 251 132 23 31 20 19 392 293 223 142 10 0 0 Reparation Order 12 5 6 2 3 6 3 0 13 32 9 8 9 19 20 14 14 57 24 28 23 38 36 34 15 106 65 48 57 76 90 73 16 104 69 68 55 102 99 76 17 106 56 56 55 72 68 60 18 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 19 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Action Plan Order 12 16 12 9 7 10 9 14 13 56 27 28 20 25 39 18 14 130 71 71 64 79 74 62 15 209 131 113 116 141 115 104 16 192 129 134 141 145 132 116 17 181 111 91 118 131 127 107 18 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 19 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Attendance Centre 12 5 1 2 1 3 4 1 13 13 8 11 6 6 6 7 14 51 26 26 14 11 32 21 15 89 45 50 52 42 68 47 16 84 59 64 53 54 69 63 17 77 60 55 49 67 82 66 18 43 31 25 27 32 22 25 19 27 20 19 15 22 15 13 Curfew Order 12 6 5 3 1 4 6 9 13 20 13 18 15 11 29 41 14 49 46 62 37 46 70 113 15 76 91 113 113 83 158 193 16 72 87 130 101 109 161 212 17 69 63 94 88 76 119 225 18 37 46 65 62 23 21 30 19 32 61 61 49 19 15 23 n/a = Not applicable Notes: Community rehabilitation orders do not apply to offenders under 16. Reparation orders only apply to those aged 17 or under. These figures have been drawn from administrative data systems. Although care is taken when processing and analysing the returns, the detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system. This data has been taken from the Ministry of Justice Court Proceedings database. This data is presented on the principal offence basis. Where an offender has been sentenced for more than one offence the principal offence is the one for which the heaviest sentence was imposed. Where the same sentence has been imposed for two or more offences the principal offence is the one for which the statutory maximum is most severe. Sentences at the Crown court are categorised according to the police force that prosecuted the offence including those sentences that may be given at a court outside the prosecuting police force’s area. The statistics are presented by criminal justice area. Police force areas correspond to criminal justice areas except for the Metropolitan and City of London Police, which are combined to form the London criminal justice area. Prosecutions brought by agencies other than the police are categorised according to the criminal justice area of the sentencing court. In the case of sentences at magistrates courts, a change was made to the categorisation by area as part of the rollout of the Libra case management system in magistrates courts during 2008. Sentences given at courts using the Libra system are categorised according to the criminal justice area of the court while sentences given at courts not yet using the Libra system are categorised in the same way as at the Crown court. By the end of 2008, all magistrates courts were using Libra. This change will have almost no impact on the categorisation by area; only around 0.01 per cent. of sentences at magistrates courts could have been affected in 2007 and 2008. Police forces do not prosecute minor offences (those that are sentenced at magistrates courts) in courts outside their areas. The figures referred to in the response relate to stand alone community sentences only. Requirements similar to those of the stand alone orders which have been given as part of the generic community order are not included. The Community Order, which was brought in by the Criminal Justice Act 2003 is available for offenders 18 and over and whose offence was committed from April 2005.
The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.
The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.
I have been asked to reply.
The available information is provided in the following table.
Data for 2009 will be available when Sentencing Statistics 2009 is published later this year.
The Courts Proceeding database does not record information on reasons why these orders have been issued, other than the offence committed.
Due to data quality issues we are unable to provide information on breaches. Work is currently under way to resolve this.
The figures referred to in the response relate to stand alone community sentences only. Requirements similar to those of the stand alone orders which have been given as part of the generic community order are not included. The community order, which was brought in by the Criminal Justice Act 2003 is available for offenders 18 and over and whose offence was committed from April 2005.
The drug treatment and testing order was replaced by the drug rehabilitation requirement of the community order under the Criminal Justice Act 2003, from April 2005, for offenders aged over 18.
Age 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 12 — — — — — — — 13 — — — — — — — 14 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 16 20 30 14 11 5 4 1 17 49 38 33 25 7 6 2 18 92 104 142 54 6 3 1 19 182 183 202 108 6 0 0 1 Drug treatment and testing orders are not available for offenders aged under 16. These records are likely to be data errors, resulting from incorrect recording of age or disposal. Notes: 1. These figures have been drawn from administrative data systems. Although care is taken when processing and analysing the returns, the detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system. 2. This data has been taken from the Ministry of Justice Court Proceedings database. This data is presented on the principal offence basis. Where an offender has been sentenced for more than one offence the principal offence is the one for which the heaviest sentence was imposed. Where the same sentence has been imposed for two or more offences the principal offence is the one for which the statutory maximum is most severe. 3. The figures referred to in the response relate to stand alone community sentences only. Requirements similar to those of the stand alone orders which have been given as part of the generic community order are not included. The Community Order, which was brought in by the Criminal Justice Act 2003 is available for offenders 18 and over and whose offence was committed from April 2005.
The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.
The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.
I have been asked to reply.
The Youth Justice Board collects figures on the number and type of staff working at each Youth Offending Team at the beginning of each financial year. The table shows information from 2004-05 as this was the first year in which this data was collected. The figures include vacant posts.
The table shows the figures on (a) volunteers, (b) (i) full-time and (ii) part-time practitioners, (c) sessional staff, (d) administration staff, (e) managers, (f) student and trainees and (g) others working at each Youth Offending Team at the beginning of each financial year.
a b (i) b (ii) c d e f g Total 2008-09 Barking and Dagenham 19 33 0 0 5 5 0 0 62 Barnet 19 18 10 0 1 7 1 0 56 Bexley 23 11 4 1 2 2 0 0 43 Brent 0 25 2 0 7 8 1 0 43 Bromley 24 26 3 8 7 5 0 0 73 Camden 0 26 13 0 8 7 0 0 54 Croydon 51 34 7 14 9 12 0 0 127 Ealing 0 23 6 3 6 10 0 0 48 Enfield 28 38 2 0 7 5 0 0 80 Greenwich 0 22 9 0 9 9 0 0 49 Hackney 0 64 5 0 14 9 0 0 92 Hammersmith and Fulham 50 34 2 4 8 6 2 0 106 Haringey 30 42 7 7 19 5 0 0 110 Harrow 40 17 8 12 7 4 1 0 89 Havering 37 19 6 10 5 3 0 0 80 Hillingdon 28 26 0 14 6 5 2 0 81 Hounslow 19 21 6 26 7 6 0 0 85 Islington 27 30 0 2 7 4 0 0 70 Kensington and Chelsea 24 23 4 1 3 5 0 0 60 Kingston-upon-Thames 0 9 2 0 2 4 0 0 17 Lambeth 24 47 0 0 8 10 0 0 89 Lewisham 42 34 9 1 8 5 0 0 99 Merton 40 15 5 7 4 4 0 0 75 Newham 0 56 1 0 9 12 0 0 78 Redbridge 0 34 6 0 9 9 1 0 59 Richmond-upon-Thames 36 6 9 1 2 3 0 0 57 Southwark 113 69 6 16 21 23 0 0 248 Sutton 43 15 5 2 3 4 0 0 72 Tower Hamlets and City of London 82 34 11 11 8 5 0 0 151 Waltham Forest 0 29 0 8 7 5 0 0 49 Wandsworth 26 21 7 17 6 6 1 0 84 Westminster 0 28 2 2 6 6 0 0 44 2007-08 Barking and Dagenham 40 31 4 22 5 7 2 0 111 Barnet 25 12 7 2 2 5 0 0 53 Bexley 22 14 6 1 3 2 0 0 48 Brent 0 24 4 12 8 5 0 0 53 Bromley 0 27 0 2 7 3 0 0 39 Camden 0 32 6 2 8 5 0 0 53 Croydon 42 39 0 12 8 7 1 0 109 Ealing 33 29 2 10 8 4 0 0 86 Enfield 28 35 2 0 10 4 0 0 79 Greenwich 0 26 8 0 8 6 1 0 49 Hackney 35 43 8 2 14 13 0 0 115 Hammersmith and Fulham 50 34 4 4 8 6 2 0 108 Haringey 0 41 13 0 16 5 0 0 75 Harrow 55 15 8 13 7 3 1 0 102 Havering 31 19 5 12 4 3 0 0 74 Hillingdon 47 25 1 16 4 5 1 0 99 Hounslow 19 22 4 26 6 6 0 0 83 Islington 0 23 2 6 5 5 0 0 41 Kensington and Chelsea 25 22 4 0 3 5 1 0 60 Kingston-upon-Thames 11 10 5 0 1 2 0 0 29 Lambeth 54 43 2 9 12 9 0 0 129 Lewisham 43 38 3 0 4 5 1 0 94 Merton 50 15 3 5 3 4 2 0 82 Newham 14 47 1 3 14 11 2 0 92 Redbridge 0 30 6 0 9 10 2 0 57 Richmond-upon-Thames 99 7 8 4 1 4 0 0 123 Southwark 113 90 6 16 21 6 4 0 256 Sutton 35 13 7 0 2 4 1 0 62 Tower Hamlets and City of London 51 20 1 8 11 4 0 0 95 Waltham Forest 0 29 3 2 9 4 0 0 47 Wandsworth 49 24 5 30 5 5 1 0 119 Westminster 15 40 0 0 6 2 2 0 65 2006-07 Barking and Dagenham 16 29 1 22 6 6 1 0 81 Barnet 32 17 4 12 4 3 2 0 74 Bexley 22 15 4 2 3 2 0 0 48 Brent 35 24 2 14 10 7 0 0 92 Bromley 35 16 6 0 2 2 0 0 61 Camden 0 29 9 1 8 5 2 0 54 Croydon 48 36 1 19 8 7 0 0 119 Ealing 34 23 4 12 6 4 1 0 84 Enfield 23 32 2 0 10 3 0 0 70 Greenwich 0 21 6 5 7 6 0 0 45 Hackney 33 35 4 2 11 4 1 0 90 Hammersmith and Fulham 34 27 4 4 8 8 2 0 87 Haringey 28 38 12 36 11 6 4 0 135 Harrow 52 11 4 10 6 4 2 0 89 Havering 39 18 7 20 5 3 0 0 92 Hillingdon 47 25 0 11 5 5 1 0 94 Hounslow 22 19 1 24 6 5 2 0 79 Islington 0 23 2 6 5 5 0 0 41 Kensington and Chelsea 17 20 2 6 5 3 1 0 54 Kingston-upon-Thames 48 7 4 0 0 2 1 0 62 Lambeth 55 46 1 0 14 3 0 0 119 Lewisham 69 38 2 0 6 4 2 0 121 Merton 35 13 2 0 3 3 2 0 58 Newham 48 59 0 16 22 17 4 0 166 Redbridge 0 28 7 0 10 8 1 0 54 Richmond-upon-Thames 66 7 10 4 2 2 1 0 92 Southwark 113 74 6 16 21 6 5 0 241 Sutton 118 15 3 0 2 4 0 0 142 Tower Hamlets and City of London 37 24 1 13 9 4 2 0 90 Waltham Forest 31 27 2 0 7 4 0 0 71 Wandsworth 57 25 5 21 4 4 2 0 118 Westminster 15 40 o 0 6 2 2 0 65 2005-06 Barking and Dagenham 12 26 6 16 7 7 1 0 75 Barnet 2 1 16 3 4 2 13 0 41 Bexley 13 15 3 2 3 2 1 0 39 Brent 22 24 0 15 9 5 1 0 76 Bromley 22 18 4 9 2 2 0 0 57 Camden 0 23 6 3 8 5 4 0 49 Croydon 38 31 2 18 8 7 0 0 104 Ealing 0 23 12 7 6 3 0 0 51 Enfield 0 17 2 11 11 3 0 0 44 Greenwich 0 21 4 1 7 4 0 0 37 Hackney 2 27 3 1 8 6 0 0 47 Hammersmith and Fulham 23 28 2 4 7 5 2 0 71 Haringey 27 30 7 77 12 4 1 0 158 Harrow 40 10 6 12 7 4 0 0 79 Havering 18 17 2 8 4 2 1 0 52 Hillingdon 24 21 1 12 3 3 0 0 64 Hounslow 32 19 1 16 6 5 0 0 79 Islington 25 21 1 4 5 3 0 0 59 Kensington and Chelsea 26 20 2 2 3 3 0 0 56 Kingston-upon-Thames 10 7 4 3 0 2 0 0 26 Lambeth 0 38 1 0 9 4 0 0 52 Lewisham 71 40 2 0 5 4 2 0 124 Merton 36 10 2 0 2 5 2 0 57 Newham 0 61 0 5 20 20 3 0 109 Redbridge 0 25 5 1 9 9 0 0 49 Richmond-upon-Thames 113 10 10 11 3 4 1 0 152 Southwark 106 64 6 20 20 6 4 0 226 Sutton 104 12 2 0 3 4 0 0 125 Tower Hamlets and City of London 22 22 0 12 7 5 3 0 71 Waltham Forest 31 28 0 0 7 3 0 0 69 Wandsworth 58 24 4 10 3 4 0 0 103 Westminster 0 34 2 0 6 2 1 0 45 2004-05 Barking and Dagenham 0 18 0 8 4 3 0 0 33 Barnet 1 2 3 4 12 2 2 0 26 Bexley 5 15 3 4 2 2 0 0 31 Brent 0 17 5 0 7 6 0 0 35 Bromley 28 14 2 9 5 2 0 0 60 Camden 16 21 9 0 5 4 2 0 57 Croydon 123 27 6 0 7 4 0 0 167 Ealing 0 23 12 7 6 3 0 0 51 Enfield 45 27 2 0 7 4 0 0 85 Greenwich 0 21 4 2 5 5 1 0 38 Hackney 2 23 3 8 6 4 2 0 48 Hammersmith and Fulham 0 33 11 5 0 4 2 0 55 Haringey 36 42 6 13 12 5 3 0 117 Harrow 55 11 6 15 5 5 1 0 98 Havering 28 20 0 10 4 2 1 0 65 Hillingdon 18 17 3 11 3 3 0 0 55 Hounslow 42 15 4 15 4 5 0 0 85 Islington 62 22 2 4 6 5 6 0 107 Kensington and Chelsea 16 17 1 1 4 4 0 0 43 Kingston-upon-Thames 0 8 1 0 2 2 0 0 13 Lambeth 49 36 3 35 11 13 2 0 149 Lewisham 0 24 4 0 16 4 3 0 51 Merton 44 16 1 0 3 2 0 0 66 Newham 0 48 1 0 12 6 7 0 74 Redbridge 0 30 0 0 8 5 1 0 44 Richmond-upon-Thames 67 10 9 5 2 2 0 0 95 Southwark 0 61 4 0 17 4 5 0 91 Sutton 0 10 5 0 2 3 0 0 20 Tower Hamlets and City of London 25 21 0 11 7 5 1 0 70 Waltham Forest 0 14 1 3 6 5 0 0 29 Wandsworth 47 16 5 4 3 4 0 0 79 Westminster 0 30 1 0 5 2 0 0 38