Cookies: We use cookies to give you the best possible experience on our site. By continuing to use the site you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
House of Commons Hansard
x
Oral Hormone Pregnancy Tests
19 March 2015
Volume 594

The following is an extract from Topical Questions to the Secretary of State for Health on 24 February 2015.

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

T7. My constituent Wilma Ord was prescribed Primodos in the 1970s, an oral hormone pregnancy testing pill that she blames for her daughter’s birth defects. As the Secretary of State is aware, it was announced back in October that an inquiry would be established to look into the whole issue. What progress has been made in setting up the inquiry and what assurances can he give my constituent, and the many other women and families affected throughout the country, that the inquiry will be fully comprehensive, transparent and independent? [907725]

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

I am delighted to report that I have met colleagues from across the House and patient representatives of that campaign on a number of occasions. We have appointed the chair and made sure that the terms of reference for the inquiry are clear and comprehensive. It is not, I stress, a judicial inquiry; it is a medical inquiry looking at the evidence.

[Official Report, 24 February 2015, Vol. 593, c. 194.]

Letter of correction from George Freeman:

An error has been identified in the response I gave to the hon. Member for Livingston (Graeme Morrice) during Topical Questions to the Secretary of State for Health.

The correct response should have been:

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

I am delighted to report that I have met the all-party parliamentary group on oral hormone pregnancy tests about the inquiry. We have appointed the chair and made sure that the terms of reference for the inquiry are clear and comprehensive. It is not, I stress, a judicial inquiry; it is a medical inquiry looking at the evidence.