Cookies: We use cookies to give you the best possible experience on our site. By continuing to use the site you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
House of Commons Hansard
x
Ministerial Corrections
19 December 2016
Volume 618

Ministerial Correction

Monday 19 December 2016

Treasury

UK Sovereign Wealth Fund

The following is an extract from the speech by the Economic Secretary to the Treasury on 14 December 2016.

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

Housing does raise productivity. It is a much-needed part of our economy. People need affordable homes to rent or buy. The building process, as I am sure the hon. Gentleman is aware, creates jobs and increases prosperity and productivity.

The hon. Member for Strangford mentioned a shale fund—a suggestion that others have made, too. The UK does not currently meet the criteria of a country that would benefit from a shale wealth fund: we have a high debt and a large deficit, and we do not have extensive commodity or natural resource exports. The development of the shale industry would leave a positive legacy for local communities and regions where it is based. The Government’s policy is for those communities to be able to choose to invest the funds for the long term. I thank the hon. Gentleman, as ever, for making a very thoughtful contribution that added greatly to the debate. —[Official Report, 14 December 2016, Vol. 618, c. 337WH.]

Letter of correction from Simon Kirby:

An error has been identified in my speech during the debate on the UK Sovereign Wealth Fund.

The correct wording should have been:

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

Housing does raise productivity. It is a much-needed part of our economy. People need affordable homes to rent or buy. The building process, as I am sure the hon. Gentleman is aware, creates jobs and increases prosperity and productivity.

The hon. Member for Strangford mentioned a shale fund—a suggestion that others have made, too. The UK does not currently meet the criteria of a country that would benefit from a sovereign wealth fund: we have a high debt and a large deficit, and we do not have extensive commodity or natural resource exports. The development of the shale industry would leave a positive legacy for local communities and regions where it is based. The Government’s policy is for those communities to be able to choose to invest the funds for the long term. I thank the hon. Gentleman, as ever, for making a very thoughtful contribution that added greatly to the debate.