Cookies: We use cookies to give you the best possible experience on our site. By continuing to use the site you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
House of Commons Hansard
x
Supreme Court Judgment: Metropolitan Police Commissioner
06 March 2018
Volume 637
The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

12. Whether he has discussed with the Home Secretary the implications for Government policies of the Supreme Court judgment on the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v. DSD and another. [904199]

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

This case is a matter for the Home Office and the police. However, I understand that the Home Office is working closely with the National Police Chiefs Council to understand the impact of the ruling and monitor current claims.

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

Failures to disclose digital evidence have led to the collapse of four rape trials in recent months. Does the Secretary of State agree that, in the light of the landmark ruling on the Worboys case, the lack of digital capacity now exposes the police to huge financial liability and risks breaching the human rights of victims on an unprecedented scale? Will he make representations to the Home Office to carry out a full resource impact assessment of the decision?

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

As the Attorney General has said, disclosure in cases is a question of public authorities performing the roles that they should and doing their jobs properly. Clearly, it is of great concern that there have been cases in which that appears not to have happened.