Cookies: We use cookies to give you the best possible experience on our site. By continuing to use the site you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
House of Commons Hansard
x
EU (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act: Implementation
03 October 2019
Volume 664
The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

1. What discussions he has had with Cabinet colleagues on the implementation of the European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act 2019. [912520]

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

I cannot, as the hon. Lady will know, comment on the content of Cabinet discussions, but she will understand that I regularly meet ministerial colleagues to discuss important issues of common interest. It would be inappropriate for me to comment on the detail of those discussions, and I am bound by the convention that neither the fact nor content of Law Officers’ advice is disclosed outside of the Government. I make it clear to the hon. Lady that the Government will obey the law, the Prime Minister is subject to the law, and this Government will comply with it.

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

Notwithstanding all that, I am going to ask the Attorney General a nice yes-no question. The Act requires the Prime Minister to ask for an extension unless Parliament has agreed a withdrawal agreement or agreed to leave without one, so will the Attorney General confirm that, if Parliament has not done either of those things, the Prime Minister would be acting unlawfully if he nevertheless took us out of the EU on 31 October? Yes or no?

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

What I can confirm to the hon. Lady is that the Government will obey the law.

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

If Parliament agrees a deal, does that satisfy what is known as the Benn amendment?

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

It is an Act.

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

Sorry—the Benn Act.

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

If Parliament agrees a deal, having had one brought before this House, that fulfils one of the conditions that means that no extension has to be sought.

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

Hypothetically speaking, if the Government were seen to be breaking the law, who would arrest the Prime Minister? Would it be the Met?

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

I do not think it is for me to comment on ridiculous speculations and hypotheticals of that kind, but it is good to see the hon. Gentleman looking calmer this morning.

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

Will the Attorney General confirm that the Government can both comply with the law and leave the EU without a deal on 31 October?

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.
The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

When asked, the Attorney General said that his Government would be adhering to the Benn Act. A day later, when asked by me and others the Prime Minister prevaricated until the end. But when he was asked by the hon. Member for Edinburgh South (Ian Murray) whether he would comply with the law, the Prime Minister’s answer was a simple and quite astonishing no. Given the Attorney General’s previous answers this morning, will he confirm whether the Prime Minister was wrong?

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

I have not seen the response to which the hon. Gentleman refers, but I can certainly confirm that the Government will comply with the law. I am not convinced that the Prime Minister said anything contrary to that; I would have to look at Hansard.

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

I have the European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act 2019 in front of me, so perhaps the Attorney General can confirm his interpretation of it. The Act is clear that, if this House has not approved a deal or if it has not approved leaving with no deal, the Prime Minister

“must seek to obtain from the European Council an extension”

in the terms set out in the Act. Will the Attorney General confirm that that is what this Act of Parliament requires?

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

The hon. Gentleman has read it out, and he does not need any confirmation from me. He is a superbly competent lawyer—[Interruption.] So I am told by others on his side of the House. The reality is that the Government will comply with the law.

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

I am afraid that confirmation is required from the Attorney General. Let me explain why. We keep being told that the Government will comply with the law, yet the Prime Minister goes around saying that he would rather be dead in a ditch than apply for the extension that he is required to seek under the Act. Does the Attorney General not realise that the Government’s ambiguous position towards the rule of law is damaging our justice system, our society and our international standing? Why does the Attorney General just stand by and let that happen?

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

Because I am quite convinced and completely satisfied that this Government will obey the law.