Cookies: We use cookies to give you the best possible experience on our site. By continuing to use the site you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
House of Commons Hansard
x
UNESCO World Heritage Sites
16 January 2020
Volume 669
The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

5. What steps the Government are taking to protect UNESCO world heritage sites throughout the world. [900204]

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

16. What steps the Government are taking to protect UNESCO world heritage sites throughout the world. [900215]

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

There are over 1,000 UNESCO world heritage sites globally. The UK is the proud home to 32, six of which are in Scotland. The Government take their responsibilities under the world heritage convention very seriously. In recent years, we have sadly seen some of the world’s great cultural treasures destroyed by conflict or natural disasters. We are working around the world to help to protect world heritage sites.

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

Of course we are concerned about the destruction of cultural sites due to conflict. Any attack on one of these sites is an attack on our shared global history, but when we have President Trump tweeting one thing and his advisers saying the opposite, can we really trust the assurances that these sites will not be targeted in conflict?

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

The targeting of cultural sites contravenes several international conventions to which the United States is a party, including the world heritage convention and the 1954 Hague convention. The Foreign Secretary was very clear that we expect those conventions to be adhered to.

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

The lack of direct condemnation of Donald Trump’s threats by either the Prime Minister or the Foreign Secretary was actually pretty shameful. Putting to one side for just a moment the Government’s desperate need for a US trade deal, will the Minister do what her colleagues have failed to do and unequivocally condemn the White House and President Trump for his reckless and provocative threats?

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

I think that my previous answer was very clear. The Foreign Secretary made it clear that he expected the conventions on world heritage to be adhered to.

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

I am sure that we are all comforted to know that the Secretary of State is watching us from the Gallery. Further to the questions from my colleagues, the next time the Minister speaks with the Secretary of State, who has been elevated to the Lords and so is beyond the reach of elected Members down here, will she ask whether she has had a firm guarantee from President Trump that he has withdrawn his threat? It is not enough to condemn the threat; has he withdrawn it and given that assurance?

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

This questioning from the SNP feels slightly repetitive. I think that the United States can speak for itself on its policy towards heritage sites. As I have said, and as the Foreign Secretary has been very clear, we expect the international conventions to be adhered to.