Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 492: debated on Thursday 28 January 1988

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers

Arms Control And Disarmament: Verification

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will now ensure that a superpower monopoly of verification information is not, as it is in the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Agreement, built into future arms control and disarmament agreements.

The Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty is a bilateral treaty between the USA and the Soviet Union and questions of verification and compliance are therefore primarily matters for the parties to it. However, under the terms of the Basing Country Agreement, the Government have the right to be represented on the team escorting Soviet inspectors in the United Kingdom and to be briefed after its completion on any inspection carried out in the United Kingdom.

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether as one of the depository states of the 1963 Partial Test Ban Agreement they are taking part in the exchanges of experts which are intended to devise satisfactory measures for verifying nuclear test limitation agreements, and if not whether they are satisfied that the interests of the international community in such verification are being fully taken into consideration.

The exchange of experts between the United States and the Soviet Union is aimed at agreeing upon a verification regime which will allow ratification of the 1974 Threshold Test Ban Treaty and the 1976 Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty. These are bilateral treaties, so it would not be appropriate for third country experts to participate. Any agreement on improved verification between the United States and the Soviet Union will of course benefit the interests of the international community.

Strategic Deterrents: Collaboration

asked Her Majesty's Government:What contact they have had with the French Government about the possibility of discussions on collaboration between the strategic nuclear forces of our two countries.

As my right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Defence has made clear in another place, there is no proposal for any joining together of the British and French strategic deterrents.

Foreign Affairs Council, 25Th-26Th January

asked Her Majesty's Government:What was the outcome of the Foreign Affairs Council held on 25th-26th January.

My right honourable and learned friend the Foreign Secretary and my right honourable friend the Minister of State (Mrs. Chalker) attended the Foreign Affairs Council in Brussels on 25th January.The Council discussed the financial situation in the European Community. My right honourable and learned friend made clear that there could be no overall agreement in the current negotiations without effective control on agricultural production and spending. We drew attention to the dangers in any approach which did not build on the package of measures which Heads of Government had discussed at Copenhagen. These issues will be discussed again at a special meeting of EC Foreign Ministers on 1st and 2nd February.The Council also discussed preparations for the EC/EFTA Ministerial Meeting on 2nd February; and, meeting in political co-operation, Foreign Ministers exchanged views on the Middle East, Afghanistan and East/West relations.

Northern Ireland: Services For The Terminally Ill

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will give details of the financial support given by the Northern Ireland Department of Health and Social Services to voluntary bodies in Northern Ireland providing specialist in-patient, homecare and hospital support services for the terminally ill.

The information is as follows:

Voluntary bodyAmount of grant aidFinancial yearType of grant
Northern Ireland Hospice£18,0001981–82Revenue
£100,0001983–84Capital
£50,0001984–85Capital
£17,0001986–87Capital
Beaconfield Nursing Home£5,0001984–85Capital
£6,0001986–87Revenue
£5,5001987–88Revenue

Ec Competition Rules: Exemptions

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will give details of the list of exemptions from the competition rules of the Treaty of Rome that they referred to in their answer on 21st January, and how it is anticipated that such a list will benefit airlines and passengers under the recently agreed European Community Aviation package.

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Transport
(Lord Brabazon of Tara

The exemptions concerned are laid down in Article 2 of EC Regulation 3976/87, which reads:

  • "1. Without prejudice to the application of Regulation (EEC) No. 3975/87 and in accordance with Article 85(3) of the Treaty, the Commission may by regulation declare that Article 85(1) shall not apply to certain categories of agreements between undertakings, decisions of associations of undertakings and concerted practices.
  • "2. The Commission, may, in particular adopt such regulations in respect of agreements, decisions or concerted practices which have as their object any of the following:
    • —joint planning and co-ordination of the capacity to be provided on scheduled air services, in so far as it helps ensure a spread of services at the less busy times of the day or during less busy periods or on less busy routes, so long as any partner may withdraw without penalty from such agreements, decisions or concerted practices, and is not required to give more than three months' notice of its intention not to participate in such joint planning and coordination for future seasons,
    • —sharing of revenue from scheduled air services, so long as the transfer does not exceed 1 per cent, of the poolable revenue earned on a particular route by the transferring partner, no costs are shared or accepted by the transferring partner and the transfer is made in compensation for the loss incurred by the receiving partner in scheduling flights at less busy times of the day or during less busy periods,
    • —consultations for common preparation of proposals on tariffs, fares and conditions for the carriage of passengers and baggage on scheduled services, on condition that consultations on this matter are voluntary, that air carriers will not be bound by their results, and that the Commission and the Member States whose air carriers are concerned may participate as observers in any such consultations,
    • —slot allocation at airports and airport scheduling, on condition that the air carriers concerned shall be entitled to participate in such arrangements, that the national and multilateral procedures for such arrangements are transparent and that they take into account any constraints and distribution rules defined by national or international authorities and any rights which air carriers may have historically acquired,
    • —common purchase, development and operation of computer reservation systems relating to timetabling, reservations and ticketing by air transport undertakings, on condition that air carriers of Member States have access to such systems on equal terms, that participating carriers have their services listed on a non-discriminatory basis and also that any participant may withdraw from the system on giving reasonable notice,
    • —technical and operational ground handling at airports, such as aircraft push back, refuelling, cleaning and security,
    • —handling of passengers, mail, freight and baggage at airports,
    • —services for the provision of in-flight catering.
  • "3. Without prejudice to paragraph 2, such Commission regulations shall define the categories of agreements, decisions or concerted practices to which they apply and shall specify in particular:
  • (a) the restrictions or clauses which may, or may not, appear in the agreements, decisions and concerted practices;
  • (b) the clauses which must be contained in the agreements, decisions and concerted practices, or any other conditions which must be satisfied."
  • The exemptions provided for in paragraph 2 were granted in recognition of the fact that, to date, the air transport sector has been governed by a network of bilateral and multilateral agreements between airlines and that the adjustment to a more competitive environment should be a gradual process to reduce disruption to services currently based on co-operation arrangements. The avoidance of such disruption is, of course, in the interest of passengers.These exemptions have therefore been given for a limited period and, to comply with Article 85(3) of the Treaty of Rome, conditions are attached to the exemptions which ensure that qualifying agreements do not impose restrictions which are not indispensable or afford the airlines concerned the opportunity to eliminate competition.