Skip to main content

Vehicle Excise Duty: Prosecution Criteria

Volume 495: debated on Monday 28 March 1988

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

asked her Majesty's Government:What criteria are used by the London enforcement office when deciding whether or not to prosecute of evasion of vehicle excise duty.

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Transport
(Lord Brabazon of Tara)

The decision to begin a prosecution depends upon whether or not the London enforcement office has sufficient evidence to convince a court that a person has been guilty of evading vehicle excise duty. Following the sighting of an apparently unlicensed vehicle on a public road, the department must establish that the vehicle was in fact unlicensed at the time and identify the person responsible.First-time offenders are normally given the opportunity to settle out of court by payment of a penalty. Offences involving large amounts of revenue of frequent offenders, or arising from local campaigns, are always dealt with by prosecution.