Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 570: debated on Wednesday 27 March 1996

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers

Wednesday, 27th March 1996.

Comare Report

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will respond to the report from the Committee on Medical Aspects of Radiation in the Environment (COMARE) on the incidence of cancer and leukaemia in young people in the vicinity of the Sellafield site, West Cumbria, published today.

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Health
(Baroness Cumberlege)

The Government are grateful to the committee for their thorough and comprehensive report, copies of which have been placed in the Library. Ministerial colleagues and I note the committee's concern about the continuing excess of leukaemia and lymphoma in young people in Seascale. We accept the recommendations made in the report, including the committee's recommendation that the incidence of leukaemia and other cancers in the area be kept under surveillance and reviewed periodically by the appropriate authorities. The Government also accept the committee's advice that there will be no benefit from continuing to investigate Seascale in isolation in the absence of new evidence of particular causative characteristics which could he relevant.We welcome COMARE's advice on research priorities and will continue to fund the department's long-standing programme of research in the field of radiation protection, seeking advice as necessary from expert sources. The department will also maintain contact with other funding bodies to ensure priority is given to relevant, high quality research.The Government's commitment to maintaining and updating effective radiation protection policies is demonstrated by the department's current spend of nearly £2 million a year on radiological protection research, together with support amounting to some £6.5 million a year for the National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB).Following is COMARE's main conclusion:"We conclude that there has been a continuing excess of leukaemia and other cancers in 0–24 year olds in Seascale Ward in the post—Black period 1984–1992, primarily due to an excess of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and NHL. Taken together with the results for the earlier period 1955–62 (for which comparable statistical analysis is not possible) and 1963–1983 the data show that there has been a continued excess of leukaemia and NHL in Seascale for four decades. Such evidence as we have does not indicate any excess between 1900 and 1945. We have investigated possible causes of the excess in later decades and conclude that:

  • (i) On current knowledge, environmental radiation exposure from authorised or unplanned releases could not account for the excess. Much work has been done to reduce the uncertainties present in the previous assessment although some uncertainties do still remain.
  • (ii) On current knowledge occupational exposure to radiation is very unlikely to account for the excess. Although there are uncertainties regarding internal radiation exposures it is not clear how these could affect the population of Seascale and not the other residents of small towns and villages nearby where workers from the Sellafield site also live.
  • (iii) Other possible hypotheses regarding chemicals and infectious aetiology have been considered. We conclude that environmental exposure to chemicals is unlikely to offer an explanation although admittedly the data are sparse. We do, however, believe that a mechanism involving infection may probably be a factor affecting the risk of leukaemia and NHL in young people in Seascale.
  • We conclude that the excess of leukaemia and NHL in young people in Seascale for the period 1963 to 1992 is highly unlikely to be due to chance alone. Various factors considered above could affect the incidence of leukaemia and NHL but no one factor alone could account for the increase. We cannot rule out interactions between different possible factors but, as yet, have no way of quantifying their effects nor of saying why the interaction would be unique to Seascale.

    We have now produced four reports to Government on the incidence of childhood cancer and leukaemia around particular nuclear installations. The first and present reports have been concerned with the Sellafield site. Our work to investigate the cause has entailed one of the most intensive investigations of a local public health concern, due to a suspected environmental problem, ever undertaken in the UK. In addition to our efforts, the input from Government in sponsoring research, from the NRPB and many other independent research bodies and individuals, including industry, has been very substantial. Given this effort there exists a natural expectation of a clear and unambiguous answer to the key issues being addressed. Certainly, we are in no doubt of the raised incidence of leukaemia and NHL which has occurred in the young people of Seascale, and its persistence over several decades is probably unique in this country.

    We have examined leading available current hypotheses and pathways by which the observed excess could have come about and have been unable to find any convincing explanation. We have, of course, been constrained by the fact that mechanisms involved in human leukaemogenesis are still not clearly understood. It is our view that current research efforts being undertaken in the UK and worldwide should eventually supply answers to these questions. However, until this research provides the required information we advise against further work specifically addressing the Seascale cluster until new insights into possible carcinogenic mechanisms suggest possible causes to test".

    COMARE have made five recommendations, as follows:

    "Recommendation 1 (Chapters 2, 4, 6, 8)

    We note that there are a number of epidemiological studies underway which will examine the various hypotheses which have been discussed in this report. The United Kingdom Childhood Cancer Study is testing both radiation and non-radiation hypotheses including infectious aetiology and possible predisposing features to carcinogenesis. We recommend that these should be supported to completion.

    Recommendation 2 (Chapter 2)

    We share the concern about the continuing excess of childhood and adolescent leukaemia and lymphoma and possible excess of other cancers in Seascale and we recommend that the incidence of leukaemia and other cancers in the area be kept under surveillance and reviewed periodically by the appropriate authorities and that any new cases of leukaemia or other cancer be fully characterised.

    Recommendation 3 (Chapters 2 & 7)

    We recommend that the mortality/incidence of both childhood and adult leukaemia and other cancers in Seascale for the years 1946–62 be examined as thoroughly as possible to connect the mortality study of 1900–45 with the incidence studies of 1963–92.

    Recommendation 4

    With regard to radiation specifically, our investigations have made us aware of several areas where an urgent need exists for improved knowledge. We consider that their investigation is both important for the scientific basis of radiation protection generally and for the evaluation of potential future problems in the field of radiation and public health. We therefore recommend support, wherever possible, for innovative research in the areas [set out in COMARE's report].

    Recommendation 5 (Chapters 8 & 9)

    We are aware that our inability to identify causative mechanisms to explain all the Seascale leukaemia and NHL excess reflects the present inadequate state of knowledge regarding the causes of childhood leukaemia. It is possible that this excess, and any others if they occur in future, will continue to elude explanation until underlying mechanisms are better understood. We expect such understanding to come from current and future initiatives in leukaemia and cancer research, whether related to radiation or not. We recommend that high quality innovative research, especially where it permits hypothesis testing, should be supported wherever possible, that this should be considered a necessary part of the remit of radiation protection, and that there should be continued liaison between funding bodies to ensure that essential research receives adequate priority for available funds."

    National Lottery: Effect On Charities

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they have made an estimate of the effect of the National Lottery on charitable income.

    The National Lottery has provided an unparalleled source of new funds for charities and the voluntary sector generally. The National Lottery Charities Board has so far made awards totalling £159 million, exclusively for the benefit of the voluntary sector. Furthermore, a very large part of the awards from the other lottery distributors has gone to the voluntary sector. Of the £1 billion allocated so far to arts, sports, heritage and millennium projects, almost £400 million has been awarded to voluntary sector organisations. This means that almost 50 per cent. of available lottery monies for good causes has gone to charities and voluntary organisations. As the lottery continues, similar sums of money will be available to the sector year on year.The claims which have been made so far have been based on surveys in which people state whether they have made any recent unplanned donations. These surveys say little about the size of donations, nor about whether any changes in giving are due to the lottery. A wide range of economic and social symptoms has been blamed on the lottery, from a decline in savings to a reduction in cinema attendances; but the causal link, not least for charities, is far from clear. The situation is further complicated by the fact that while there are charities which have seen donations declining since the introduction of the National Lottery, there are others which have reported an increase.During the passage of the National Lottery etc. Bill, the Government gave a commitment to monitor changes in charities' income following the introduction of the lottery. With the participation of the National Council for Voluntary Organisations, the Government have set up a research programme to look at charities' income before and after the lottery was established. Provisional findings should be available by late Spring, more comprehensive findings by next year and final results by early 1998.Examination of charities' accounts is a more reliable and factually based method of approaching this issue than surveys of the public can be. It is, however, inevitably a longer term exercise and in the meantime public surveys, a useful but secondary method of researching the issue, remain the main source of information. While this is the case, firm conclusions cannot be drawn.

    Asylum Seekers With Relatives In The Uk

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will give an undertaking that asylum seekers with relatives in the United Kingdom will not be removed to third world countries through which they may have passed before their cases are considered here.

    The Secretary of State for the Home Department has no present plans to change his policy, which is kept under review, in respect of the exercise of his discretion to consider substantively claims made by asylum seekers who have travelled here from a safe third country and who might otherwise be returned here.The Secretary of State will normally decide to consider a case substantively if the applicant's spouse or unmarried minor child is in the United Kingdom, or, if the applicant is an unmarried minor child, the applicant's parent is in the United Kingdom. In addition, discretion is exercised according to the merits of individual cases where the applicant is a parent whose married minor is in the United Kingdom (or vice versa); the applicant is an elderly or otherwise dependent parent; or the family link is not one which would normally be considered but there is clear evidence that the applicant is wholly or mainly dependent on the relative in the United Kingdom and that there is an absence of similar support elsewhere.

    Mr Festus Otono

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Why Mr. Festus Otono, now in Her Majesty's Prison, Haslar, Gosport, has been detained for one and a half years; and when they expect his application for political asylum to be determined.

    The decision to detain Mr. Otono was taken only after careful consideration of all the circumstances and only when the Immigration Service were not satisfied that he would comply with any terms of temporary admission. Mr. Otono made a bail application on 22nd March 1996, and the date for a bail hearing has yet to be set.Mr. Otono was refused asylum in the United Kingdom on 30th January 1995. His appeal was heard by a special adjudicator on 29th January 1996 and was dismissed on 12th February 1996. At a tribunal hearing on 22nd March 1996, the appeal was remitted for a further hearing before a special adjudicator. A date for the appeal hearing has yet to be set.

    Immigration Casework: Computerisation

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they plan to introduce computers into the handling of immigration casework.

    The Immigration and Nationality Department has developed a programme to computerise the handling of immigration casework in order to deliver improvements in service, to strengthen the administration of the control and to produce substantial efficiency savings. A seven year contract is to be awarded to Siemens Business Services under the private finance initiative, by means of which the company will design, build, finance and operate a comprehensive new IT system for this purpose and assist IND in the introduction of appropriate working methods.

    Motorway Service Areas: Access Applications

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What is their policy on providing access from the motorway network to new motorway service areas.

    The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Transport
    (Viscount Goschen)

    The Highways Agency is consulted on all planning applications for new motorway service areas (MSAs). It will not normally object so long as the proposal meets a range of minimum requirements relating to the facilities to be provided and the spacing of the site from other MSAs, and provided the proposed access arrangements are acceptable in safety and traffic management terms. As a matter of policy, however, we do not expect to connect new MSAs to any motorway which, because of exceptional traffic circumstances, has been or is expected to be widened to dual five lane standard. To do so would invite further congestion on what are the most heavily used parts of the motorway network.

    Export Of Defence Equipment: Review

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What arrangements they will make to examine the nature and extent of information currently provided on the export of defence equipment as recommended in Sir Richard Scott's report.

    My department is leading the review recommended by Sir Richard Scott. It will examine the nature and extent of information currently provided, and will take account of the industrial, employment and diplomatic implications of any change in the longstanding parliamentary convention governing the disclosure of information. We shall be seeking the views of a wide range of interested parties and will report back to the House before the Summer Recess.Noble Lords wishing to comment on any issue that the review might cover should write to:

    • Mrs. Mollie Field
    • Export Information Review
    • Room 0206
    • Ministry of Defence
    • Main Building
    • Whitehall
    • London SW1A 2HB

    Copies of the document already placed in the Library of the House which sets out the current position in relation to informing Parliament about the export of defence equipment can be provided on request.

    The closing date for contributions to the review process will be 24th May 1996.

    Crown Accommodation Classification And Grading Scheme

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will publish their final proposals following the review by the English Tourist Board of the Crown classification scheme.

    The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of National Heritage
    (Lord Inglewood)

    The English Tourist Board will shortly present my right honourable friend the Secretary of State for National Heritage with proposals for a revised Crown accommodation classification and grading scheme. My right honourable friend intends to consult the tourism industry on these proposals before final decisions are announced.

    Hanish Islands

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether in view of the current dispute between Eritrea and the Yemen over the Hanish islands, they accept that the United Kingdom as the former colonial power in the region, has some responsibility for the dispute; what protection they are offering to any British trading interests that may remain in the region; and what steps they are taking to promote a peaceful settlement of the dispute.

    Her Majesty's Government do not consider they have responsibility for the dispute. The 1923 Treaty of Lausanne provides for the future of the islands to be settled by the parties concerned. We support efforts by the French Government and others to help resolve the dispute, and have made clear we are willing to provide access for both sides to historical documents in our possession. We continue to ensure that British shipping and aviation are kept informed of developments in the area.

    Zambian Constitution: Harare Declaration

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will ask the Commonwealth secretariat to conduct an inquiry into the compatibility of changes proposed to the Zambian Constitution with the Harare Declaration.

    Her Majesty's Government have no plans at present to ask the Commonwealth secretariat to conduct such an inquiry.

    Zambia: Detention Of Editors

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they are aware that the indefinite detention of Fred M'membe, editor-in-chief of the

    Post and Bright Mwape, managing editor of the Post, on charges of contempt of Parliament is being justified by the Zambian authorities on the grounds that their Parliament inherited these powers from the United Kingdom; whether they will ask the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association to conduct a seminar on the use of contempt powers by Parliaments; and whether, in the meantime, they will ask the Zambian Parliament to suspend the detention of the journalists pending clarification of precedents.

    We are aware that two editors of the Post newspaper have been detained following a Zambian parliamentary ruling. We have no plans at present to ask the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association to conduct a seminar on the use of contempt powers by parliaments. Meanwhile we do not intend to approach the Zambian Parliament about the detentions.

    Indonesia: Uk Aid

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What was the value of aid to Indonesia in each of the years 1990–91 to 1995–96; what is the projected value of aid to Indonesia in 1996–97, and what are the figures in each year for the cost of military and police training respectively.

    The value of aid to Indonesia was as follows:

    £ million
    YearTotal ODA programmeCDC investments and otherTotal gross expenditure
    1990–9117.597.5725.16
    1991–9221.2013.2234.42
    1992–9321.3911.2932.68
    1993–9422.2112.6734.88
    1994–9521.4230.0451.46
    In 1995–96 we expect the ODA programme to total some £38.4 million. On current planning, the anticipated level of the ODA programme for Indonesia for 1996–97 is broadly in line with the estimated spend for the current year. Figures for CDC investments are not yet available.

    Costs of police training between 1990–91 and 1994–95 were as follows:

    £ million

    1990–91:0.28
    1991–92:0.18
    1992–93:0.28
    1993–94:0.13
    1994–95:0.11

    In 1995–96 we expect to spend around £0.09 million; and in 1996–97 we anticipate expenditure of around £0.02 million on UK based police training as a residual component of the police management training project which is coming to an end.

    Details of military training given to countries overseas, which is not funded from the aid programme, are confidential between governments.