Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 609: debated on Tuesday 15 February 2000

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers

Tuesday, 15th February 2000.

Small Business Service

asked Her Majesty's Government:What forms of advice they intend farmers to use the Small Business Service for. [HL919]

The Minister for Science, Department of Trade and Industry
(Lord Sainsbury of Turville)

In creating the Small Business Service (SBS), the Government intend to provide a strong voice for small business at the heart of government, improve the quality and coherence of business support and help small businesses to meet the demands of regulation. The aim is to ensure easy access to advice and information on regulatory and business issues for all small businesses, including farmers.

General Medical Council: Adverse Findings

asked Her Majesty's Government:How many National Health Service consultant psychiatrists have been (a) erased and (b) suspended by the General Medical Council in each of the years from 1992 to date; and what was the effect on the consultant's contract of each case of suspension; and [HL871]What arrangements are in place to disseminate in the National Health Service adverse findings made against doctors by the Professional Conduct Committee and Committee for Professional Performance of the General Medical Council; and whether they are satisfied with such arrangements. [HL872]

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Health
(Lord Hunt of Kings Heath)

This information is held by the General Medical Council (GMC). They inform us that there was one psychiatrist erased, and one suspended from the Medical Register in 1995, and one suspended and subsequently erased in 1998. Matters relating to a consultant's contract are between the doctor and the National Health Service employer. In cases where consultants are erased from the Medical Register, the contract with the employer becomes void and the doctor is no longer able to practise medicine. In cases of suspension from the GMC register, the consultant is not able to work in the NHS until the suspension is withdrawn.It is a contractual requirement that all doctors who work in the NHS are registered with the GMC.Adverse findings against doctors made by the Professional Conduct Committee and the Committee for Professional Performance are sent to NHS trusts and health authorities in the form of a Health Service Circular. We are currently reviewing the present arrangements.

Armed Forces Pay Review Report

asked Her Majesty's Government:What are the recommendations of the Armed Forces Pay Review Body report. [HL1050]

The 2000 Report of the Armed Forces Pay Review Body has been published today. Copies are available in the Vote Office and the Library of the House. We are grateful to the Chairman and members of the Review Body for the work they have put into them.In the Comprehensive Spending Review the Government made it clear that public sector pay settlements would need to be fair and affordable and support budgeted public service improvements. In making their recommendations, the AFPRB have taken into account a number of considerations, including the recruitment, retention and motivation of the Armed Forces and have recommended an increase in basic military salary of 3.3 per cent for all ranks, with the exception of Privates, Lance Corporals, Captains and Lieutenants, who should receive 3.8 per cent. An increase of 1 per cent in X Factor is also recommended. The X Factor, which has not been reviewed for five years, is paid as an addition to basic pay and reflects the differences between conditions of service experienced by members of the Armed Forces over a full career and conditions in civilian life, which cannot be taken directly into account in assessing pay comparability. The graduate starting salary is set at £18,126 per annum. There are also some increases in Additional Pay (eg Flying Pay, Submarine Pay and Hydrographic Pay) and in Longer Separated Service Allowance/Bonus.These recommendations will fully support the Armed Forces strategic personnel policies, in particular in relation to recruitment and retention, The additional cost to the Defence Budget will be £260 million. This will be met within existing departmental expenditure limits.The AFPRB's recommendations are to be accepted in full, with implementation effective from 1 April 2000.

Queen Alexandra's Royal Naval Nursing Service

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they have any plans to alter the current status of Queen Alexandra's Royal Naval Nursing Service (QARNNS) and, if so, how this will affect personnel serving within QARNNS. [HL1049]

Following a comprehensive review, the Queen Alexandra's Royal Nursing Sevice (QARNNS) will be incorporated into the Royal Navy (RN) from 1 April 2000 as the Service's specialised nursing branch. QARNNS is currently a separate Service within the Naval Service.This will bring the status of QARNNS into line with that of the Army and RAF. It will also mean that QARNNS personnel commissioned or engaged into the RN from 1 April 2000 will be available for reserve service once they leave the RN. QARNNS ratings currently have no liability for reserve service.The terms and conditions of service of existing QARNNS personnel will be unaffected by this change.

Hijacks: Handling Policy

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether, in view of the fact that Stansted now handles more than 9 million passengers a year, and those numbers are rising, they will consider designating a less busy airport for hijacked airliners. [HL1008]

The Minister of State, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
(Lord Macdonald of Tradeston)

All UK airports must be capable of handling hijacked aircraft, but a particular advantage of Stansted is that it can continue to operate during an incident without a great deal of disruption after the initial phase. Policy on handling of hijacks is reviewed as a matter of course after an incident.

South Yorkshire Objective 1 Programme

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether any specific projects are earmarked for recognition by the Objective 1 status monies allocated to South Yorkshire; and what is the reason for the delay in payments. [HL994]

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions
(Lord Whitty)

The South Yorkshire Objective 1 Single Programme Document was received by the European Commission on 17 November 1999. Under the Regulations, the Commission has five months to approve the programme. It is expected that the South Yorkshire programme will be approved in principle at the end of March. Until it is approved, no projects can be submitted. However, South Yorkshire partners are making preparations to ensure that projects can come forward as soon as the programme is fully operational.

London Mayor And Assembly Members: Election Expenditure Limits

asked Her Majesty's Government:When they propose to respond to the consultation on the expense limits for the election of the London mayor and assembly. [HL894]

My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State announced the Government's proposed limits for candidates' and third parties' election expenditure on 3 February 2000 (Official Report, col. 650).

London Roadworks

asked Her Majesty's Government:What proportion of traffic-impeding roadworks in London, during the most recent three-year period for which statistics are available, were attributable to:

  • (a) highways maintenance and improvements;
  • (b) works on behalf of essential utilities (electricity, gas and water) or telephone systems; and
  • (c) works on behalf of non-essential services (for example, cable television). [HL920]
  • This information is not held centrally in the form requested. The highway authorities and the utilities co-operate with each other within the framework of the New Roads and Street Works Act 1991. In London, the Highway Authorities and Utilities Committee (HAUC) co-ordinates and monitors the activities of the utilities' street works. I will write to you to say what information is available in respect of the utilities' works.

    M4 Bus And Taxi Lane

    asked Her Majesty's Government:When they intend to publish the trial results for the M.4 bus and taxi lane. [HL944]

    The M.4 bus lane pilot scheme is being independently monitored by the Transport Research Laboratory. Details of the performance of the scheme during the first three months' operation of the bus lane were published last November by the Highways Agency and a copy has been placed in the Library of the House. The results show that all vehicles benefited by reduced average journey times. Subsequent monitoring is showing that these benefits are continuing.The detailed monitoring by TRL is continuing. Further results will be released from time to time.It is too early to provide details of the effect of the scheme on accidents, but the police who patrol the motorway consider it is now safer.

    Organophosphates: Advisory Paper Ms17

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the revised version of the Health and Safety Executive's MS17 has been published; and to whom it is to be distributed. [HL965]

    Guidance note MS17, now retitled Medical aspects of work related exposures to Organophosphates, has been finalised following publication of the Committee on Toxicity report into organophosphates. It will be published towards the end of March, and copies will be placed in the Libraries of both Houses.The specialised advice in MS17 is aimed at doctors and occupational health professionals. Copies will be sent to those consulted in the revision and relevant government departments and agencies. Discussions are still under way with the Department of Health on the most effective methods of publicising the revised document to the defined target audience. Arrangements will be made to publish a summary of the guidance on the Internet, and work is under way to include a reference to MS17 under the section "Information for doctors" on the labels of OP sheep dip products when they are next revised. MS17 will also be available extensively as a priced publication from HSE Books and high street bookshops.

    M11: Litter Clearance

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they are aware of the litter on the M.11 motorway between the A.406 and the M.25; what steps they intend to take to ensure that the contractor responsible for its removal clears it up; and whether a penalty for non-performance will be applied to the contractor responsible for this length of motorway. [HL863]

    I have asked the chief executive of the Highways Agency, Mr Peter Nutt, to write to the noble Lord.

    Letter to Lord Marlesford from the. Chief Executive of the Highways Agency, Mr Peter Nutt, dated 15 February 2000.

    The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Lord Whitty, has asked me to reply to your recent parliamentary Question about litter on the M.11 between the A.406 (Junction 4) and the M.25 (Junction 6).

    Our Term Maintenance Contractors are responsible for litter sweeping and clearance on instructions from our agents, who make regular inspections and safety patrols, plus occasional checks at night. While no penalty is payable, payment for the work would not be approved unless it was carried out to the satisfaction of our agents.

    Weather and other constraints permitting, the M 11 between Junctions 4 and 6 is scheduled for litter picking and sweeping within the next two weeks.

    No exceptional litter problems had been identified recently and no general complaint received about this stretch of motorway, but we do acknowledge that, in spite of our best efforts, during adverse weather conditions or when traffic queues build up, large amounts of litter can accumulate very quickly along any busy motorway.

    If you have any further queries on this matter please contact the Highways Agency's Area Manager, Mike Ford, on 01306 878219.

    Rough Sleeping

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether, in the interests of the health, welfare and safety of rough sleepers, they will institute a policy of zero tolerance towards sleeping on the streets where adequate and reasonable accommodation exists within (a) one mile, (b) two miles, or (c) three miles. [HL937]

    No. The Government recognise that sleeping rough is extremely bad for the health and welfare of the individuals concerned and are therefore committed to reducing rough sleeping in England to as near zero as possible or by at least two-thirds by 2002. This commitment is backed up by a budget of nearly £200 million over three years.One element of the Government's strategy for tackling rough sleeping is to ensure that there is adequate accommodation available. The most vulnerable rough sleepers, however, will need more than accommodation to help them off the streets. Many will have other, more complex, needs, including drugs or alcohol abuse, and mental health problems, and these must also be addressed. Only then can we help rough sleepers to develop a settled and meaningful lifestyle away from the streets.

    Young Offenders: Re-Conviction

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What percentage of offenders aged under 18 are re-convicted following release from custodial sentences within two years and four years respectively. [HL913]

    Estimates from criminal histories of a sample of young offenders who were aged under 18 when discharged from custody in 1987 showed that around 78 per cent were reconvicted within two years of release and around 87 per cent were reconvicted within four years of release. A more recent sample showed that around 85 per cent of those aged under 18 when discharged in 1995 where reconvicted within two years; a comparable four-year reconviction rate is not yet available.

    Extradition Requests: Secrecy

    asked Her Majesty's Government:For how long it has been their policy not to reveal whether requests for extradition have been received in individual cases; and what are the reasons for such a policy. [HL905].

    It has always been our policy not to reveal the existence of an extradition request in advance of an arrest taking place, since to do so could enable the subject of such a request to evade extradition proceedings.

    General Pinochet: Extradition Request

    asked Her Majesty's Government:On which date they first revealed that an application had been received for the extradition of General Pinochet. [HL906]

    The request for the extradition of Senator Pinochet was transmitted to the United Kingdom police via Interpol, from the Spanish authorities, on 16 October 1998, and his arrest took place on the same day. My right honourable friend the Home Secretary first made a statement to Parliament about the case in another place on 22 October 1998, Official Report, col. 1205.

    Organophosphate Pesticide Approvals: Manufacturers' Data

    asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether the Advisory Committee on Pesticides, in conjunction with the Pesticides Safety Directorate, relating to their assessment of the health effects of organophosphates, have asked manufacturers to provide data relating to the effects of organophosphates on human immune, endocrine and reproductive systems. [HL1002]

    The Minister of State, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food
    (Baroness Hayman)

    The information required to support pesticide approvals is detailed and comprehensive. It is designed to detect all key adverse effects. These include potential effects of the compound on human immune, endocrine and reproductive systems.

    Agriculture Development Scheme Projects

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What are the costings for each project announced under the Agriculture Development Scheme on 2 February and the length of each project. [HL952]

    The size of individual awards is commercially confidential, but these grants range in value from £5,500 to £100,000. It is a condition of the scheme that all projects must be complete and claims for grant submitted by 30 November 2000.

    Bse

    Official Report an updated table showing the number of cases of BSE confirmed in Great Britain each week in 1999 and in the current year to date, together with the moving annual total of cases reported in each 52-week period. [HL737]

    The following table shows the number of cases of BSE confirmed in Great Britain during each week of 1999 and in the current year to 3 February, together with the moving annual total of cases reported for each 52-week period.

    Week NumberNumber confirmed each week52 week Total Reported
    1999
    1164,232
    21314,226
    3904,173
    4904,150
    5504,126
    61274,119
    7464,079
    8744,052
    91494,024
    10724,019
    11913,999
    12603,974
    13533,942
    14313,908
    15743,875
    16443,849
    17593,822
    18483,813
    19233,820
    20663,780
    21723,786
    22193,770
    23243,761
    24153,737
    25713,723
    26793,697
    27503,662
    28303,642
    29383,632
    30503,599
    31633,591
    32613,557
    33263,532
    34213,490
    35173,473
    36733,431
    37513,412
    38743,387
    39153,358
    40133,315
    41333,270
    42823,259
    43763,196
    44233,155

    Week Number

    Number confirmed each week

    52 week Total Reported

    45233,124
    46333,094
    47383,088
    48353,069
    49193,044
    50283,016
    51322,994
    5202,984

    2000

    1332,957
    2602,906
    3132,874
    4252,846
    5132,818

    Note: 1999 Week 1 is the week ending Friday 8 January. 2000 Week 1 is the week ending Friday 7 January.

    As a result of the sampling of heads from cattle slaughtered under the Over Thirty Month Scheme (OTMS) during the first quarter of 1999, an extra 18 BSE cases were confirmed. These have been included in the figures for confirmed cases for week 30. These 18 OTMS survey cases are excluded from the column for reported cases as they were not reported and placed under restriction while alive.

    The data for reported cases excludes one private submission which was included in data already supplied to the noble Lord, Lord Marlesford, by my predecessor, my noble friend Lord Donoughue, on 29 July 1999, Official Report, col. WA 221 This private submission, which tested positive, remains recorded as a confirmed case.

    It should be noted that the rate of confirmation may not closely reflect the progress of the epidemic. This is because there may be a variable and sometimes long delay between slaughter and confirmation as a result of delays in laboratory diagnosis and administrative procedures. The delay between slaughter and confirmation is on average six to eight weeks, but may on occasion be considerably longer.

    Agriculture Development Scheme Awards

    asked Her Majesty's Government:What projects have been awarded grants under the Agriculture Development Scheme 1999; how much has been awarded to each project; and what criteria were used when awarding the grants. [HL915]

    As my right honourable friend the Minister announced on 2 February, 47 awards of grant totalling £2 million have been made under the Agriculture Development Scheme 1999. A list of the successful projects is given below. The size of individual awards is commercially confidential but they range in value from £5,500 to £100,000.Each application was assessed against the following criteria: the abilities of the proponents to deliver the project, and their financial viability; the requirement for grant to progress the project; the economic difficulty being experienced by the sector targeted, the proportion of primary producers within the sector likely to benefit from the project and the duration of that benefit; the likely benefit to the agri-food economy as a whole; the relevance of the project to the issues facing the sector; value for money; the quality and credibility of the application; and the quality of proposals for disseminating the results of the project to relevant interests.

    SectorLead organisationProject title
    PigsAssured British MeatNational assurance database information and administration system (pigs module)
    PigsAssured British MeatABM Assured British Pigs Scheme data merger
    PigsBOCM Pauls LtdMaximising pig carcass value
    Pigs/organicEastbrook Farm Organic Meats LtdGrowing the organic pigmeat market from a UK production base
    PigsFood Trak plcTraceability in the pig meat supply chain
    PigsJSR Farms LtdIntegrated pig meat supply initiative
    PigsLadies In PigsA catering colleges initiative to secure the future for British pigmeat in catering
    PigsMeat & Livestock CommissionProject 2: improving supply chain communications
    PigsNational Pig AssociationA risk management initiative for the UK pig industry
    PigsUnited Pig MarketingA shared IT and information system for UPM and its supply chain partners
    PigsUniversity of AberdeenA training package for the British pig industry using multi-media technology
    BeefGlendale Beef ProducersGlendale Beef Producers initiative
    Beef/dairyWarwickshire Quality CalvesImproving the value of beef calves from the dairy herd
    DairyNational Milk Records plcProposal for a southwest dairy information network
    Dairy/organicOrganic Milk Suppliers CooperativeDesign and initial implementation of a novel technology transfer and quality management system on organic dairy farms
    Dairy/specialityBusiness Link Bradford & DistrictFeasibility study into potential for a yoghurt production facility for the Asian community
    EggsBritish Free Range Egg Producers AssociationBritish Free Range Egg Marketing Company Ltd
    SheepBritish Sheep Dairying AssociationImplementation of structural development of the sheep dairy sector

    Sector

    Lead organisation

    Project title

    Sheep/specialityBusiness Link Bradford & DistrictNew routes to new markets—investigation into ways of making better use of sheepmeat products to the benefit of producers
    Wild boarThe British Wild Boar AssociationTo improve collaborative marketing activity between primary and secondary producers of British farmed wild boar
    Livestock generalAssured British MeatMultiple retail caterers— food safety assurance module
    Livestock generalAssured British MeatAssurance chain—focus farms
    Livestock general/regional/ specialityAssured British MeatAssurance and food heritage
    Livestock generalFarmway LtdMarketing cooperatively produced branded port, beef and lamb through "Farmway" co-operative stores: a feasibility study
    Livestock generalHarper Adams University CollegeBuilding regional enterprise and agricultural competitiveness through IT(Breakthrough-IT)
    Livestock generalMeadow Valley Livestock LtdImproving farmers' efficiency and returns by directing them to market led, added value marketing schemes
    Livestock generalSouth East Primestock Producers (SEPP) LtdA plan for regional growth and farmer
    Livestock general/organic/ specialityHumane Slaughter AssociationMobile slaughter unit 2000
    Nursery stockHorticultural Trades AssociationA project to influence structural change in the landscape supply chain to build value in the soft landscape market
    Nursery stockHorticultral Trades AssociationA project to extend the HTA nursery certification scheme to include the inspection and supply of local provenance
    Nursery stockHorticultural Trades AssociationA project to develop a greater understanding of the supply chain within the nurserystock sector
    OnionsBritish Onion Producers OrganisationSector analysis of the onion market
    PotatoesHereward GrowersCollaborative marketing initiative
    Soft fruitAdvanced Marketing Services LtdSoft fruit development for category management
    Soft fruitThe Berryworld Producers' Organisation LtdDevelopment of an integrated traceability system for the soft fruit industry

    Sector

    Lead organisation

    Project title

    TomatoesTomato Growers AssociationInvestigation into the development of an intergrated quality management system for the British tomato industry
    Top fruitFruition Group LtdRationalisation: the basis of a full category player
    Horticulture generalCheckmate InternationalBenchmarking services for the EUREP GAP framework
    Horticulture generalInstitute of Grocery DistributionBenchmarking the industry
    Combinable cropsSamuel Rose LtdPromoting vertical integration through farmer collaboration in agricultural supply chains
    Combinable cropsUnited Grain Producers"The Marlborough Group" (working together to improve farm incomes)
    Farmers' marketsNational Association of Farmers MarketsTogether to market
    Direct sellingFarm Retail AssociationRed and Green box scheme feasibility study
    ViticultureThe Magpie ConsultancyFormation of a collaborative marketing company owned by producers and devoted to the marketing development of the wines and vineyards of England
    TroutLongford EstateCo-ordinated approach to trout marketing
    GeneralPlunkett FoundationIncreasing competitiveness in the farmer controlled business sector through the use of best practice benchmarking
    GeneralLantraIncreasing the competitiveness of the land based sector

    Senior Salaries Review Body Report

    asked Her Majesty's Government:When they will publish the report of the Review Body on Senior Salaries and what are its main recommendations. [HL1072]

    The 2000 report of the Review Body on Senior Salaries, which makes recommendations about the pay of the senior civil service, senior military personnel and the judiciary, together with the annual uprating of parliamentary salaries, is being published today. Copies are available from the Vote Office.

    The main recommendations of the Review Body are:

    • an increase from 1 April 2000 of 2.9 per cent in the minimum and maximum values of each of the pay bands for the senior civil service. Within the bands, departments and agencies will determine individual awards on the basis of performance. A further 0.4 per cent of the total senior civil service paybill should be made available to fund additional performance awards for the most senior staff, whose pay has fallen well behind comparable remuneration elsewhere. Promotion to and within the senior civil service should be recognised by a move to a higher pay band and an increase of not less than 10 per cent;
    • an increase from 1 April 2000 of 3.3 per cent in judicial salaries, with additional increases for seven senior members of the judiciary as a result of changes in the salary structure at those levels in recognition of their increasing responsibility for judicial leadership and the supervision of the judicial system.
    • An increase from 1 April 2000 of 3.3 per cent in the maxima of the pay ranges within which individual salaries are set for senior military personnel.

    The Government have decided to accept these recommendations. Their cost will be met within existing departmental expenditure limits.

    Pay increases for Members of Parliament and Ministers are linked automatically to the increase in pay bands for the senior civil service. Their pay entitlements will therefore increase from 1 April 2.000 by 2.9 per cent.