Skip to main content

Written Statements

Volume 685: debated on Wednesday 25 October 2006

Written Statements

Wednesday 25 October 2006

Health: Independent Sector Treatment Centres

My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Ivan Lewis) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.

The Government have today laid before Parliament their response to the Health Select Committee's report Independent Sector Treatment Centres (ISTCs) Cm 6930. The Government are responding to the 25 recommendations made by the committee on the operational ISTCs in the firstwave of the programme and the next phase of procurements. Copies of the response have been placed in the Library.

National Memorial Arboretum

My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Defence (Derek Twigg) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.

I am pleased to advise the House that we have agreed to extend the existing grant-in-aid paid to the National Memorial Arboretum Company Ltd in support of the running costs of the National Memorial Arboretum at Alrewas, Staffordshire. The current grant of £250,000 a year was due to expire in October 2006. It will be extended for a further three-year period, initially at the current level but increased in line with inflation from October 2007.

Northern Ireland: Billy Wright Inquiry

My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (Peter Hain) has made the following Ministerial Statement.

On 1 April 2004 my right honourable friend the Member for Torfaen (Paul Murphy) announced the Government's intention to establish public inquiries into the deaths of Robert Hamill, Rosemary Nelson and Billy Wright, following reports by Mr Justice Cory. In his Statement to the House that day my right honourable friend said:

“We will, of course, take all reasonable steps to control costs in the inquiries that I have announced today, including capping legal costs where appropriate”.—(Official Report, Commons, 1/4/04; col. 1757.)

In line with that Statement, I subsequently agreed a number of measures to ensure that the inquiries would, while having the resources to establish the full facts in each case, operate in a cost-effective manner. These measures included maximum hourly rates payable for publicly funded legal representation by counsel and solicitors; and a 40-hour cap on hours that might be claimed in any given week. The chairmen of all three inquiries have taken seriously the need to ensure that the inquiries operate in a cost-effective manner, and I am grateful to themfor that.

The inquiry considering the death of Billy Wright is now under way under the chairmanship ofthe right honourable Lord MacLean. Following representations from him I granted his requests to be converted into an inquiry under the Inquiries Act 2005 under Section 15 of that Act.

Section 40(4) of the Inquiries Act contains a power for a Secretary of State to place conditions or qualifications on any awards that the chairman of the inquiry may make under Section 40(1) and 40(2)in respect of compensation, expenses or legal representation. After discussions with the inquiry, I have decided today to issue the following notice of determination under Section 40(4) in respect of awards for legal representation. This notice will not alter the substance of those sections of the inquiry’s costs protocols concerned with the award of funding for legal assistance but it will reinforce the limits on hourly rates that may be claimed by legal representatives.

The measures the notice contains have been discussed with the chairman of the inquiry and I know will have the support of honourable and right honourable Members and the general public.

Notice of Determination by the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland to the Chairman of the Billy Wright Inquiry Under Section 40(4) of the Inquiries Act 2005

The Secretary of State for Northern Ireland has determined under Section 40(4) of the Inquiries Act 2005 that the power of the chairman of the Billy Wright Inquiry to award amounts in respect of legal representation under Section 40(l) and (2) of that Act shall be subject to the qualifications and conditions set out below, which supplement and are in addition to the terms and conditions in the protocol for representation and the costs of legal representation when funded at public expense published by the inquiry on 12 January 2006 (“the Costs Protocol”).

The qualifications and conditions are:

1. For the purposes of paragraph 9b of the Costs Protocol, the maximum hourly rates for counsel and solicitors shall be:

leading counsel: £200;

junior counsel: £100; and

solicitors: £150

2. For the purposes of paragraph 9c of the Costs Protocol, the maximum number of hours that can be charged in respect of each member of a legal team of a represented party shall be 40 hours per week save that the solicitor to the inquiry can authorise the exceeding of the 40-hour per week cap up to 60 hours for counsel during the oral hearings and for a short period before they commence where he is satisfied that such action is justified, for example where the work involved in any week clearly needs to exceed40 hours.

3. For the purposes of paragraphs 5 and 9c of the Costs Protocol, a witness who is granted fundingto cover the reasonable cost of legal assistance to prepare for, and deliver their evidence, shall be entitled to claim a maximum of 50 hours worth of legal assistance.

4. In respect of paragraph 2 of this notice:

(a) No unused hours in any week may be set off against any other week.

(b) A week shall be taken as commencing on Saturday and ending on Friday.

5. The hourly rates specified in paragraph 1 and the numbers of hours specified in paragraphs 2 and 3 may be exceeded only with the prior approval of the Secretary of State.

Transport: Nottingham Express Tram

My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Transport (Douglas Alexander) has made the following Ministerial Statement.

I have today given programme entry approval to a scheme to extend the Nottingham Express Transit (NET). The promoters, Nottingham City Council and Nottinghamshire County Council, are seeking to build on the success of Line One with two new extensions. The extensions are planned to go to Chilwell/Beeston and Clifton, linking directly into Line One at Nottingham Station.

The Nottingham tram has been a great success in encouraging people on to public transport. These extensions provide the opportunity to continue this success and give people in the south of Nottingham quicker and more convenient access to the city centre. We are still at an early stage in the approval process but we will continue to work with the Nottingham authorities so they can deliver a tram that is attractive to passengers and value for money for the taxpayer.

Subject to the scheme progressing satisfactorily to full approval, central Government will contribute funding of up to £437 million in PFI credits towards the costs of the extensions. Programme entry demonstrates our support for the extensions. Provided that the necessary planning powers are granted and the other conditions of funding approval are satisfied, including that costs are kept under control, construction of the extensions could startin 2010.