Skip to main content

Prisons: Staffing

Volume 691: debated on Friday 20 April 2007

asked Her Majesty’s Government:

For each prison in England and Wales, including contracted-out prisons, what is the current shortfall in prison officers; and, in each case, what is the shortfall as a percentage of the stated optimum level for each prison. [HL2823]

The latest available information on the shortfall of officers at each prison establishment against the operational staffing requirement is contained in the following tables. The shortfalls incorporate the contribution of contracted supplementary hours.

Public Sector Establishments: Shortfall of Officers against Operational Staffing Requirement (incorporating the contribution of contract supplementary hours)

31/12/06

Public Sector Establishments

Total

Percentage of requirement

Acklington

-

-

Albany

-

-

Ashwell

2

1.7

Askham Grange

1

4.5

Aylesbury

0

0.2

Bedford

4

2.5

Belmarsh

22

3.8

Birmingham

0

0.0

Blakenhurst

-

-

Blantyre House

2

6.1

Blundeston

2

1.0

Brinsford

12

5.0

Bristol

6

2.4

Brixton

22

9.3

Brockhill

7

8.5

Buckley Hall

-

-

Bullingdon

3

1.1

Bullwood Hall

4

4.5

Camp Hill

2

1.4

Canterbury

1

0.6

Cardiff

1

0.6

Castington

6

2.6

Channings Wood

1

0.3

Chelmsford

31

13.1

Coldingley

3

3.3

Cookham Wood/ ESP

4

3.3

Dartmoor

8

4.9

Deerbolt

4

2.1

Dorchester

5

4.3

Dover

2

1.6

Downview

8

5.7

Drake Hall

1

1.0

Durham

5

1.5

Eastwood Park

-

-

Edmunds Hill

0

0.2

Elmley

-

-

Erlestoke

6

5.1

Everthorpe

-

-

Exeter

-

-

Featherstone

8

5.5

Feltham

2

0.6

Ford

3

4.5

Foston Hall

15

10.2

Frankland

21

3.4

Full Sutton

15

3.2

Garth

-

-

Gartree

5

2.4

Glen Parva

2

0.9

Gloucester

-

-

Grendon

9

5.8

Guys Marsh

5

3.6

Haslar

2

3.6

Moorland

-

-

Haverigg

2

1.7

Hewell Grange

0

1.2

High Down

1

0.6

Highpoint

3

1.5

Hindley

-

-

Hollesley Bay

1

1.1

Holloway

14

5.2

Holme House

2

0.6

Hull

3

0.9

Huntercombe

7

4.1

Kingston

1

1.3

Kirkham

3

3.0

Kirklevington Grange

-

-

Lancaster

-

-

Lancaster Farms

-

-

Latchmere House

-

-

Leeds

-

-

Leicester

-

-

Lewes

1

0.4

Leyhill

5

7.0

Lincoln

6

3.1

Lindholme

1

0.4

Littlehey

-

-

Liverpool

11

2.7

Long Lartin

-

-

Low Newton

-

-

Maidstone

11

6.8

Manchester

1

0.1

Morton Hall

2

1.9

New Hall

-

-

North Sea Camp

2

4.2

Northallerton

3

4.5

Norwich

15

6.2

Nottingham

5

2.4

Onley

17

8.2

Parkhurst

-

-

Pentonville

-

-

Portland

4

2.2

Preston

4

1.6

Ranby

9

3.2

Reading

-

-

Risley

-

-

Rochester

1

0.7

Send

7

8.6

Shepton Mallet

1

1.6

Shrewsbury

4

3.9

Stafford

3

1.9

Standford Hill

-

-

Stocken

-

-

Stoke Heath

10

4.0

Styal

-

-

Sudbury

-

-

Swaleside

-

-

Swansea

-

-

Swinfen Hall

4

1.8

The Mount

12

7.4

The Verne

4

3.5

Thorn Cross

-

-

Usk/Prescoed

-

-

Wakefield

24

5.5

Wandsworth

9

2.3

Warren Hill

-

-

Wayland

0

0.0

Wealstun

-

-

Wellingborough

3

1.5

Werrington

7

8.4

Wetherby

5

2.7

Whatton

4

1.9

Whitemoor

-

-

Winchester

3

1.4

Woodhill

25

5.4

Wormwood Scrubs

-

-

Wymott

4

1.6

Notes:

1. Information has been derived from the personnel corporate database, Oracle HRMS and quarterly forecast change forms completed by each establishment.

2. A dash indicates either no shortfall or staff in post exceed requirement.

3. A zero in the table refers to a fraction of a post that rounds to zero.

4. Information relates to prison officers, senior officers and principal officers, and includes the contribution to staffing availability of contract supplementary hours.

Contracted Prison Establishments: Shortfall of Prison Custody Officers

28/02/07

Contracted Establishments

Total

Percentage of optimum level

Ashfield

4

Not provided

Altcourse

4

1.1

Bronzefield

5

3.0

Doncaster

1.5

0.6

Dovegate

11

0.4

Forest Bank

-

-

Lowdham Grange

1.8

Not provided

Parc

15

5.9

Peterborough

4

1.5

Rye Hill

9

6.9

Wolds

-

-

Notes:

1. A dash indicates either no shortfall or staff in post exceed requirement.