Skip to main content

Development: Independent Advisory Committee

Volume 691: debated on Wednesday 9 May 2007

My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for International Development has made the following Statement.

The Government are committed to ensuring that the UK’s aid budget is used effectively to make a difference to the lives of the world’s poorest people and that it represents value for money.

As our spending on international development increases, we want to continue to ensure that resources for development are used well and as intended; that mechanisms are in place for learning lessons and monitoring effectiveness; and that aid has a real impact on helping to reduce poverty and change the lives of poor people.

Our international development assistance is currently subject to external scrutiny in the UK by Parliament, the Public Accounts Committee, the International Development Select Committee and the National Audit Office. The international mechanisms include monitoring of aid effectiveness under the Paris declaration and peer review of donors within the OECD development assistance committee (DAC). DfID has its own evaluation, audit, and reporting under the International Development (Reporting and Transparency) Act. The department also talks to civil society about new policy and lessons arising from our operational experience.

Having reviewed these arrangements and how we might strengthen the independence of our evaluation, I have decided to set up a new independent advisory committee for development impact (IACDI).

The committee, which will be independent of DfID, will have four main functions:

first, it will determine which programmes and areas of UK development assistance will be evaluated, and when, by approving the evaluation programme and priorities currently identified by DfID’s evaluation department;

secondly, it will identify any gaps in the planned programme of evaluations and make proposals for new areas or other priorities as required;

thirdly, it will assess the amount of effort and level of resources devoted to different types of evaluation by DfID, other parts of the UK Government and, if appropriate, by NGOs using DfID resources; and

fourthly, it will determine whether relevant standards—for example, of the OECD/DAC—are being applied and comment on the overall quality of the programme evaluation carried out against these.

For major evaluations, members of the independent committee will chair the relevant steering group and will have full responsibility for approving and releasing final reports for publication. This will provide a built-in challenge function and an assurance that evaluation standards have been met.

The chair of the IACDI will write annually, through a published letter to me, providing an overview of lessons learned and advice on how evaluation can be further improved. I will then set out the action that we propose to take in response.

To ensure full independence and transparency, the chair and the six members of the committee will be appointed under Nolan procedures. The selection process will look for respected experts on international development and evaluation, both from the UK and developing countries. Members will be chosen by the chair of the IACDI to avoid any conflicts of interest. The minutes of all IACDI meetings will be published.

I have discussed with the National Audit Office how it can assist, given its role in providing an independent assurance of our work. I am pleased to say that it has agreed to carry out a review of DfID’s performance on evaluation and to repeat that every three to four years.

The NAO review will complement the work of the IACDI and will focus more broadly on performance management systems across DfID. IACDI, on the other hand, will get directly involved in the strategy and work plans for evaluation and in ensuring that the recommendations from evaluation work are followed up. I will also invite the National Audit Office to participate in the work of IACDI so that it can draw on this in its own auditing programme.

The creation of IACDI will be an important step forward in assuring all of us that UK development assistance is making a difference. But I also intend to continue to seek improvements in the accountability and scrutiny of development assistance internationally. DfID is actively exploring opportunities for international collaboration with partner Governments and other donors. In the longer term I hope that we can work towards an international approach that can enhance the evaluation of development assistance. I will report further to the House in due course.

I believe that, taken together, these proposals will assist in ensuring independent, open and transparent scrutiny of our development assistance.