My right honourable friend the Secretary of State (Hilary Benn) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.

Today, I am laying before Parliament a draft Animal Health Bill that sets out major changes that I am intending to implement on responsibility for, and management of, animal health in England.

The draft Bill would establish a new body in England, headed by an independent board and chair, with responsibility for animal health policy and its application, matters that currently rest with the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. The draft Bill draws on extensive consultation over a number of years on the policy of responsibility and cost sharing for animal health. It is based on a partnership working approach that will be increasingly central to the development of animal health policy and the means by which it is carried out on the ground. This will enable the experience and expertise of those making a living in the livestock and other animal-related sectors to contribute to the policies and decisions on animal health.

Central to long-term success in combating animal disease, reducing its incidence and cost and increasing the nation’s resilience to its impacts is bringing about behaviour change among those directly affected. The development of responsibility sharing in the provisions of the draft Bill will help to secure the needed changes in business practices and attitudes.

The other part of this new approach, as proposed by Iain Anderson in his report on the lessons to be learnt from foot and mouth in 2001, is a degree of sharing of the costs involved with those who both benefit directly from animal health measures and whose businesses bear the brunt of animal disease. Accordingly, the Government will bring forward in due course separate measures relating to cost sharing.

Copies of the draft Bill are available in the Vote Office.

My right honourable friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer (Alistair Darling) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.

I am pleased to inform the House that the planned legal and capital restructuring of Northern Rock as announced in my Written Ministerial Statement of 8 December 2009 successfully took effect on 1 January 2010. As a result, two new companies are now carrying out the business formerly carried out by Northern Rock—Northern Rock plc, a new savings and mortgage bank, and Northern Rock (Asset Management) plc, the existing company (renamed) that holds and services the majority of the existing residential mortgage book.

The Government’s actions to stabilise Northern Rock over the past two years have protected the savings and deposits of hundreds of thousands of British families. From 1 January 2010, a healthy new Northern Rock will offer savings and mortgage products, increasing competition in the sector and providing consumers with more choice.

In my Statement of 8 December, I also promised to provide the House with details of the financial support provided by the Government to support the restructuring of the company.

On 31 December 2009, the Government provided Northern Rock plc with £1.4 billion of capital support in order for the company to meet the Financial Services Authority (FSA) regulatory capital requirements. The Government have also provided a commitment to the FSA that up to £1.6 billion in additional capital support will be provided to Northern Rock (Asset Management) plc should the need arise in order for Northern Rock (Asset Management) plc to continue to meet its regulatory capital requirements. These amounts are within the £3 billion of capital support announced by the Government in August 2008.

The outstanding government loan owed by Northern Rock (Asset Management) plc has been reduced by £12.6 billion from £26.9 billion as at 31 December 2007 to £14.3 at 31 December 2009. The loan increased on 4 January 2010 by £8.5 billion, taking the outstanding loan balance to £22.8 billion, in order for Northern Rock (Asset Management) plc to finance the difference in mortgage assets and retail and wholesale deposit liabilities that were transferred to Northern Rock plc. As previously announced, Northern Rock plc will use the cash that it has received from Northern Rock (Asset Management) plc to increase mortgage lending.

The Government are also providing a working capital loan facility to Northern Rock (Asset Management) plc currently up to £2.5 billion to help with the orderly wind-down of the company. This liquidity facility is similar to the working capital loan facility that the Government have provided to Bradford & Bingley plc. The Government expect the loan facilities to Northern Rock (Asset Management) plc to be repaid in full.

The restructuring of Northern Rock has been assessed as the best means of achieving the Government’s stated objectives to support financial stability, protect depositors’ money and deliver value for money to taxpayers. The restructuring is also part of the Government’s policy to encourage and support a well functioning mortgage market, where lenders lend responsibly and borrowers have access to a wide range of mortgages that they can afford to repay. At some point in the future, the Government will sell its stake in Northern Rock plc. In any sale, the objectives of the Government will be to promote competition for retail services, secure the best possible return to taxpayers and ensure that Northern Rock plc will continue to increase its lending to home owners.

My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (John Denham) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.

On October 14, I informed Parliament about my plan to reinvigorate and connect with those communities that are feeling the pressure from recession most acutely and to ensure that they are well placed to share fully in future prosperity and emerge stronger and more cohesive. On 14 December, I extended the programme beyond the initial 21 local authorities to 75.

I can today inform Parliament that I am announcing a further extension of the programme to bring the total number of areas receiving targeted help in addressing local issues to 161 across over 100 local authorities.

I am also announcing an additional £20 million of resources for the programme to continue in the next financial year.

The programme is enabling local people to influence, shape and change policies on issues that really matter in their community. It will help to make sure that those people who are feeling the pressure the most are getting a bigger say and a fair deal.

Practical actions delivered on estates and streets will focus on making changes that address local people’s concerns, reconnect them with jobs and tackle head-on issues—real and perceived—that left neglected can prove fertile territory for extremism and those who would divide our communities.

My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Government Equalities Office (Michael Jabez Foster) has made the following Statement.

The Equality Bill, currently before the House of Lords, will introduce a new integrated equality duty, which will bring together the existing race, disability and gender equality duties and extend them to cover age, sexual orientation, religion or belief and gender reassignment in full. The equality duty will follow the same structure as the current duties and will be underpinned by a number of specific duties, to be set out in secondary legislation, which will help public authorities in the better performance of the duty.

On 11 June 2009, the Government published a consultation document entitled Equality Bill: Making It Work—Policy Proposals for Specific Duties, setting out policy proposals for the new specific duties. The consultation finished on 30 September and today we have published a policy statement in response to the consultation entitled Equality Bill: Making It Work—Policy Proposals for Specific Duties. A Policy Statement, summarising the responses and setting out our further thinking for the specific duties.

We are placing copies of the policy statement in the Libraries of the House. Copies will also be available on the Government Equalities Office website www. equalities.gov.uk.

We will consult further on the draft regulations for specific duties following Royal Assent to the Equality Bill.

I represented the United Kingdom at the EU informal Energy Council in Seville on 15 January 2010.

The council began with a wide-ranging discussion on the possible contents of a new energy action plan (due in early 2010). Debate focused in particular on two areas highlighted by the presidency’s questions—the internal market and low-carbon technologies—as well as the need to diversify further the routes and sources of EU energy supplies and ensure consumers were protected.

Discussions on the internal market focused in particular on interconnection and how to ensure the investment that will be required. Member states referred, among other things, to implementation of the third internal energy market package and the role of the Agency for Co-ordination of Energy Regulators (ACER).

On low-carbon technologies, renewables and smart grids were consistent themes. Some member states supported specific cross-border projects such as the Mediterranean solar plan and the North Seas offshore grid initiative. Other technologies where it was felt EU action might be useful included: electric cars, biomass (in particular developing sustainability criteria) and carbon capture and storage. Most member states also referred to the importance of energy efficiency.

Ministers visited the Abengoa solar plant over lunch. This was followed by presentations on the EU’s strategic energy technologies (SET) plan and on domestic solar energy, biomass and electric vehicles policy from member states. The UK made a short presentation on domestic carbon capture and storage.

The Spanish presidency concluded that there was strong support for progress on an EU energy action plan, as well as further work on the SET plan, during its presidency.

In the evening, Ministers attended a joint dinner with Environment Ministers, although there was no formal agenda.

My right honourable friend Ed Miliband, Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.

I represented the United Kingdom at the EU informal Environment Council in Seville on 16 and 17 January 2010.

The council programme began with a session on the role of civil society post-Copenhagen. Short speeches from industry, trade union and civil society representatives were followed by ministerial discussion which highlighted the importance of government, companies, NGOs and civil society working together.

The second item covered environmental governance and technological co-operation, which included presidency questions on mercury, international environmental governance and the sixth environmental action programme. The session opened with two presentations from UNEP and the Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. In discussions on international negotiations on mercury, the UK intervened to call on the EU to proceed with caution in seeking to broaden the scope of the legal instrument, in order not to stall the intergovernmental negotiating committee process. In addition, several member states showed support for the UK view on the need to reform the current international environmental governance system. In relation to the sixth EAP, the UK indicated that any new framework must be based on a comprehensive assessment of where we are now, what will be the challenges of the next 10 years and what are the most appropriate mechanisms to address these challenges.

The final session in the council programme focused on next steps following Copenhagen. The UK highlighted that it is in the EU’s economic and environmental interests to show leadership and that the shared objective now should be to broaden, deepen and strengthen the commitments made in Copenhagen, and quickly to take forward the actions necessary to deliver the promises on finance that we made in the accord. The EU should encourage more countries to associate themselves with the accord, maintaining the momentum towards a legal framework. An exchange of views followed on the target that the EU should submit to the accord appendix by 31 January. The presidency concluded that, while support was lacking for an unconditional offer of 30 per cent, the EU would need to find a formulation that underlined the EU’s willingness to move to 30 per cent in the right circumstances.

My honourable friend the Minister for Europe (Chris Bryant) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.

The figures given in the House of Lords Answer delivered on 5 January 2010, Official Report, cols. WA 26-27, were incorrect. The latest report shows there were a total of 15 instruments (and not 14 as incorrectly given previously) which Ministers supported before one or both of our parliamentary EU committees had completed their scrutiny. Instrument 15 related to document 7616/08 on ship source pollution, a Ministry of Justice lead. The table below provides information on how many of these 15 instruments were scrutiny overrides in each House, with the departments shown as leading on these instruments.

My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for International Development has made the following Statement.

An earthquake of magnitude 7.0 struck Haiti near the capital Port-au-Prince on the evening of 12 January. During the course of last week, smaller but still significant aftershocks continued to affect the area around Port-au-Prince. The situation for an estimated 3 million Haitians remains precarious.

It is clear that this is a human tragedy of enormous proportions. The United Nations estimates that at least 2 million people will require immediate relief assistance for the next six months. So far, the Government of Haiti say that 150,000 people are confirmed dead and the Haitian Interior Minister estimates that the total death toll may reach 200,000.

Following my Written Statement to the House on 19 January, British officials from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office have been in contact with over 70 British nationals in Haiti, who have confirmed that they are safe and well, and we are co-ordinating with US, Canadian and EU partners to facilitate an assisted departure for any British nationals who wish to leave Haiti. We have received reports that other British nationals are missing, but we do not have any further information at this stage.

The British public have responded with generosity to the Disaster Emergency Committee appeal, which has so far raised over £42 million. I pay tribute to the work of the Disaster Emergency Committee, its NGO members and the British public for this remarkable response.

The British Government have moved very quickly with our response. The UK search and rescue teams were in Haiti for over a week, carrying out their lifesaving work, including pulling three people from the rubble alive, arranging medical evacuations, treating the wounded and helping the United Nations to co-ordinate the overall search and rescue effort. After consulting with the United Nations, we concluded that they had done all that they could and that the rescue effort was moving on to another phase. The British team returned to the United Kingdom on Saturday 22 January, at the same time as other international search and rescue teams headed home. The United Kingdom should be incredibly proud of their efforts.

We have also committed £1 million for the International Federation of the Red Cross to provide food, shelter, water and other immediate needs for 20,000 families; £2 million for the World Food Programme for transport and logistics; £1 million to assist with aid co-ordination to ensure that the right aid reaches those who need it quickly; £300,000 for the World Health Organisation for disease surveillance to help to prevent epidemics; and a further £2.5 million to NGOs with established operations on the ground—Oxfam, Action Against Hunger and Handicap International—to deliver clean water, shelter, medical care and food for 160,000 earthquake victims.

On 19 January, as the scale of the disaster that had unfolded in Haiti became clearer, the British Government announced a tripling of our humanitarian aid to £20 million. The additional funding will enable our support to extend beyond immediate humanitarian relief. Over the next four or five days, we are sending a further three flights with non-food items such as shelter kits, jerry cans and blankets. The United Kingdom’s Stabilisation Unit is deploying civilian experts and supplies to help to restore vital government functions. A team of three from the unit has already deployed with equipment including vehicles, field offices and communications equipment to support British efforts and strengthen co-ordination with other partners in Haiti.

We have also taken the decision to deploy the Royal Fleet Auxiliary ship “Largs Bay”, to carry further vital relief goods. The ship is expected to depart by the end of the month and will help to assure continuity of supply of vital goods such as food, shelter and medical supplies. Following a request from the United Nations, it is expected to stay on to assist in distributing supplies around Haiti.

We continue to support strengthened co-ordination by the United Nations and the Government of Haiti. The United Nations Office for Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs has rapidly increased its staffing to co-ordinate relief on the ground. The humanitarian clusters are accelerating their work and we are exploring options for further help to the shelter clusters. The Prime Minister spoke with Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon last week and subsequently with President Obama to discuss how both countries could support the United Nations in their roles. The Prime Minister welcomed the role played by President Clinton as UN Special Envoy to Haiti and that of acting Special Representative Edmond Mullet.

The United States military is playing a crucial role in supporting the humanitarian effort, keeping the airport functioning, clearing the port and enabling aid to get where it needs to. It is working well with the United Nations in support of the international relief effort.

Aid is now getting through to affected communities but the pace of delivery needs to be accelerated. So far, over 500,000 people have received assistance. By 22 January, there were over 120 water distribution points in Port-au-Prince. The Government of Haiti have identified six formalised settlements to house 120,000 people and work has started to build them. Medical provision is also improving and the United Nations has announced that there are now enough doctors and surgeons in the country. There are at least nine field hospitals operational in Haiti as well as a 1,000-bed hospital ship and six more on the way. The Department for International Development provided funding for an assessment team and a specialised surgical team from Merlin, which are now working on the ground in Port-au-Prince.

More still needs to be done. A shortage of trucks and fuel, exacerbated by the airport’s limited capacity to receive, warehouse and dispatch relief supplies, continues to hamper relief efforts in and around Port-au-Prince. Over 200,000 people have left Port-au-Prince for other parts of Haiti and as many as 800,000 people are believed to be reliant on temporary shelters. Our early contribution to the World Food Programme for logistical support has helped, and RFA “Largs Bay” will transport more trucks to help with aid distribution. Ministers are liaising at the highest level with the relevant authorities to unblock bottlenecks.

The situation for many survivors in Haiti remains precarious. In these difficult circumstances, it is notable how civil society in Haiti has come together in the face of personal tragedy. I am meeting with faith leaders today to discuss how to support the work of church networks in Haiti and others in bringing people together. The British Government will support Haitians in this task.

We continue to follow the security situation very closely, both for our teams and for the wider operation, and share the concerns expressed by the United Nations that the relatively stable situation could deteriorate. Following Security Council Resolution 1908 to bolster the Haitian peacekeeping mission with an additional 2,000 troops and 1,500 police, we congratulate countries offering additional personnel and urge the speedy deployment of these peacekeepers in their humanitarian role.

Once the relief phase is over, it is essential that the international community does not forget about Haiti. We welcome the efforts that multilaterals are already making to support the recovery and reconstruction. We expect our contribution to be through our very substantial support to multilaterals and we are looking urgently at ways of providing longer-term support for Haiti through the European Commission, the World Bank and other multilaterals. To this end, the European Union Foreign Affairs Council meeting of Development Ministers on Monday 18 January pledged longer-term reconstruction funding as well as significant funding for humanitarian support. Also, today member countries from the long established grouping the Friends of Haiti will meet in Montreal to start the planning process for a major conference in the spring on post-emergency reconstruction, which we fully expect to attend. Leading multilaterals will also attend the Montreal meeting and the United Kingdom will be represented by the European Union delegation.

Going forward, it is clear that Haiti will need grant assistance and development support for the foreseeable future and on terms consistent with its future debt sustainability. The United Kingdom has already cancelled all debts owed by Haiti as part of the heavily indebted poor countries initiative in June 2009. We will continue to play our part in responding to the short-term and long-term needs of the Haitian people.

My honourable friend the Minister of State for Borders and Immigration (Phil Woolas) has today made the following Written Ministerial Statement.

I am pleased to announce a further extension of the national identity service following a successful implementation of the introduction of voluntary identity cards, from 30 November 2009, in Greater Manchester and at Manchester and London City airports and, from 4 January 2010, to the rest of north-west England.

From 8 February 2010, young people aged between 16 and 24 who are resident in Greater London will be able to apply for a voluntary identity card at a fee of £30 at the relevant Identity and Passport Service office.

In addition, from 8 February 2010, anyone resident in the United Kingdom aged 16 and over who has registered an interest in identity cards, or registers their interest by 30 June 2010, on the Identity and Passport Service website at: https://info.ips.gov.uk/ipscw/reg may also apply for an identity card at the Identity and Passport Service offices in London and in north-west England.

Initially, these further rollout groups will cover British citizens who hold either a valid United Kingdom passport or one that has expired at any time since 1 January 2009.

I am pleased to announce that the Government have submitted their economic evidence on the national minimum wage to the Low Pay Commission. The commission will take this and all the other evidence received into account when preparing its next report on the minimum wage, which will be submitted to the Government by the end of February 2010.

The economic evidence addresses recent trends in economic and labour market performance, as well as the impact of the national minimum wage on pay, employment and younger workers.

Copies of the Government’s economic evidence have been placed in the Libraries of both Houses and will be available from the BIS website at www.bis.gov.uk.

The Government submitted their evidence on non-economic issues to the commission in October 2009.

My honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport (Paul Clark) has made the following Ministerial Statement.

In its guidance note “Modernising Trust Ports”, second edition, issued in July 2009, the department strongly encouraged the major trust ports in England and Wales to analyse their corporate structure and keep it under review, with a view to identifying opportunities to enhance their efficiency and get value from their assets, and to report their conclusions to the department by April 2010.

The Government’s operational efficiency programme set out a policy framework to guide decisions on how activities using public assets will be delivered. This recognised that, in seeking to deliver services more effectively with limited resources, there may be advantages in some cases to adopting alternative forms of ownership.

In considering the appropriateness of sale of an asset, the Government will consider a range of factors. The following Statement sets out the factors that the Government currently consider likely to be particularly relevant to consideration of the appropriateness of sale of a major trust port.

The factors applying to sales in general include:

whether it is possible to ensure continued delivery of high-quality services and other policy goals (such as supporting economic competitiveness and growth) with a different form of ownership;

whether there is or could be a satisfactory degree of competition if the service were provided in the private sector;

the extent to which the sale could be expected to increase investment, potentially through reduced constraints on borrowing, or enhance efficiency or quality; and

the feasibility of sale in terms of market appetite and the value for money likely to be achieved.

Other factors applying equally to the sale of trust ports include:

the desirability of giving all bona fide prospective purchasers a fair and equitable opportunity to make an offer;

the desirability of encouraging disposal of equity to managers and employees of the port; and

whether the sale could be expected to help to deliver reliable and efficient transport networks.

The department has issued a guidance note concerning the procedure for the voluntary sale of trust ports. I have placed a copy in the Library of the House.