Cookies: We use cookies to give you the best possible experience on our site. By continuing to use the site you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
House of Commons Hansard
x
Crown Prosecution Service: Northamptonshire
22 March 2018
Volume 638
The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

1. What assessment he has made of the effectiveness of the performance of the Crown Prosecution Service in Northamptonshire. [904509]

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

The CPS in Northamptonshire excels in a number of key areas. For example, its rape conviction rate is nearly 10% above the national average. I also highlight the case of Nicholas and Joan Taylor, who were convicted of 84 offences related to child abuse committed against 11 victims over a decade. That was the subject of one of the largest investigations conducted by Northamptonshire police, resulting in life sentences with minimum terms of 18 years.

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

Which aspects of its performance does the CPS in Northamptonshire need to improve?

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

Like any other area, CPS East Midlands is aware of the need to improve its victim communications and liaison, and its engagement with the community, to ensure that the quality of its casework improves. I do, however, commend the service for its work on hate crime, with a conviction rate of over 90%.

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

Would the CPS in the county, in an alleged case of a police officer mistreating a criminal, be expected to ask whether and when the investigating police first interviewed the recorded officer in charge—the arresting officer—before agreeing to charge someone else?

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

I would expect the CPS to make sure, in any case, that there has been a thorough disclosure exercise involving a proper review of all documentation and a complete review of the history of the case, and that the evidence is followed wherever it leads.