Cookies: We use cookies to give you the best possible experience on our site. By continuing to use the site you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more
House of Commons Hansard
x
Nuclear Power Stations
20 November 2018
Volume 649
The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

9. What steps he is taking to ensure that value for money is achieved from energy generated from proposed new nuclear power stations. [907699]

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

As the Secretary of State said in his statement to the House on 4 June, in our negotiations with nuclear developers, a key focus of discussions will be achieving value for money and lower electricity costs for consumers.

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

The National Audit Office has already confirmed that Hinkley Point C was a bad deal. Half the existing nuclear power stations will have closed by 2024 and the rest by 2028, and no nuclear power stations can be built in time to replace them. Why are the UK Government tying up energy policy for the next 50 years in deals that are poor value for money?

The edit just sent has not been saved. The following error was returned:
This content has already been edited and is awaiting review.

As far as I know, the hon. Gentleman and his party are against nuclear power altogether, so his is an interesting question. The Government, on the other hand, are committed to a diverse energy mix in which nuclear power plays a crucial part. Nuclear power is critical to our transmission to a low-carbon society, providing continuous, reliable, low-carbon electricity. We are also leaders in cutting emissions by renewables, and nearly 30% of our electricity comes from renewable sources.