Skip to main content

Commons Chamber

Volume 34: debated on Friday 3 May 1816

House of Commons

Friday, May 3, 1816

complained of an inaccuracy which he had noticed in one of the daily papers in the few remarks he had made the other night on the question of the bank restriction. He considered it of some importance to correct such an error, which might otherwise go out to the public unnoticed. What he was made to say in one of the daily papers was, that " there was not a bank director who was not anxious to resume cash payments as soon as possible, while, at the same time, they were all grateful for the present bill, as it allowed them two years for doing so, within less than which time it could not with certainty take place." He denied having made such a statement; but what he had asserted was, " that the measure ought not to be considered as one applying only to the bank of England, but as a measure in which the general interests of the empire were concerned." This was what he had on that occasion stated, and he disowned having made any declaration that the directors of the bank were thankful for the present bill.

Property Tax

seeing the chancellor of the exchequer in his place, wished to submit a motion to the House for the production of certain papers; and, when the subject of them was known, he was convinced there would be no objection to their being laid before the House with the least possible delay. He alluded to certain circular letters issued under the authority of the treasury to the surveyors of the different districts, calling upon them to transmit full and particular copies of all the assessments to the income tax. The dates of these letters were in March, May, and August, 1815, and called upon the surveyors for copies of the assessment under the tax for the year 1815. For what purpose these accurate copies of the assessment were required, it was now immaterial to ascertain; but he believed no one could doubt but that they were intended for no other purpose than for the better enforcement of the tax. Under these circumstances, it was very natural to suppose, that with the tax the application for these assessments would expire also: but the fact was not so, for he had understood, from very good authority, that on the 17th of April, 1816, about a month after the vote of the House had put an end to the very name of the property-tax, as it was hoped, letters were issued from the treasury, calling upon these surveyors of taxes for full and complete copies of the assessment of every man's income. Now, if such were really the fact, he should wish to know what could be the object of making this inquiry into the affairs of every man, after the act had expired? It was to him, he confessed, a perfect mystery. To gratify what curiosity, in what quarter, for what purpose, was this full and complete copy of the assessment of every man's income—for those were the words of the letters—to be given? Clerks were employed to make out copies of these assessments, and the returns made to London were ordered to be kept in neat books, which were accessible, not merely to the commissioners of taxes, but to every little petty clerk in the office. With the hope, therefore, of hearing from the right hon. gentleman opposite that no such orders were issued, or at least, if issued, without the authority or knowledge of the treasury, he should conclude with moving, " That there be laid before the House copies of a Circular Letter in March, May, and August, 1815, from the tax-office to the surveyors of the different districts, respecting the transmission to the board, of copies of all assessments to the income tax, and of all letters on the same subject in April, 1816."

had no objection to the production of the papers called for by the motion. Such a circular as the hon. and learned gentleman had described had certainly been issued by the board of taxes in the discharge of their duty. No new orders had been issued on the subject; but it was obvious, if some step of this kind had not been taken, many irregularities must have occurred in the collection of arrears.

observed, that such could not be the object of the returns, for it was mentioned in the circulars sent to the collectors, that the returns should be made out with neatness and accuracy, as they were to be kept as records in the tax-office. To such records being kept he had a most strong objection, as they would give an unfair exposure of the private circumstances of individuals who paid the tax. He thought it unjust to have such documents to refer to, in order to see what such and such a man was worth at any particular time, and he should soon take an opportunity of moving, that directions be given to the board of taxes, in order that they may take steps for the destruction of all such records.

replied, that he should, when the return was made, be prepared to meet any motion the hon. and learned gentleman might think proper to make.

deprecated this system of preserving the records of the assessment of the property of individuals, as being a remnant of that inquisitorial measure which the sense of the country had destroyed.

The motion was agreed to.

gave notice that on Monday he would move a congratulatory address to his royal highness the Prince Regent on the marriage of the Princess Charlotte.

thought that on such an occasion the earliest day possible should be taken for the Address [Cries of ' Move, move!'].

Civil List Bill

The order of the day being read, for taking into consideration the report which, upon the 16th of June 1815, was made from the select committee appointed to take into consideration the Account presented to the House upon the 20th of March, 1815, by Mr. Arbuthnot (by command of his royal highness the Prince Regent) relating to his majesty's Civil List,

rose, in pursuance of the notice which he had given on a former evening to move for leave to bring in a bill for the better regulation of his majesty's civil list. The consideration of this question was, he said, attended with much embarrassment, from its very complicated nature, which was such that it was hardly possible to make a statement respecting it, so clear and so free from all difficulties, as to enable gentlemen, who had not given their minds to the subject more attentively than most of the hon. members of that House could do, to see all its combinations, and all the inferences growing out of it. It was a question also of great delicacy, as it went to expose the immediate expenses of the sovereign, and the expenses of the Crown were naturally looked upon with more jealousy in this country than any other. In making this assertion he did not mean to say that there was not as much generosity in this country as in any other; but, in this, as in all free governments, and in this as the freest of all more than in any other, an excess on this head was viewed with a suspicious eye; and that which came immediately home to the sovereign, was uniformly a matter of anxious and national inquiry. He felt likewise much pain in entering on this question, as there was no subject on which more misrepresentation had gone abroad; because a notion existed that the civil list expenditure had no connexion with the public service, but solely related to the sovereign. He wished to place the question on fair grounds—he did not pretend to deny that a considerable portion of the sums granted for the civil list were to meet the necessary expenses of royalty; but for the greater part of them, it was as completely a national expenditure for the service of the country, as the grants annually made for the army and navy, and every other department of the public service. He was anxious that the proposition should be fairly understood, and that it should be seen in a proper light. It was therefore his intention for the present to throw out of his consideration the provision made on the civil list for the junior branches of the royal family, as he should have to speak on that subject hereafter. This he proposed to deduct from the expenditure of the civil list in the estimate which he should submit to them, as also that incurred for the Windsor establishment. The expense last adverted to, the House must be aware, arose from the calamity that had fallen on the country, by which it found it-self with a king unable to discharge the functions of sovereignty, but for whom it must, notwithstanding, keep up a suitable establishment. If the expenses thus thrown on the country were included in the estimate, its amount would be 1,339,000l., and out of this sum only 409,000l. could be brought home to the sovereign to support his public splendour, or to meet the charge of his domestic enjoyments; and in this sum 60,000l. was comprehended, which appeared in the first class of the civil list for the privy purse, as also the additional 10,000l. granted to her majesty, when it became necessary to form that establishment of which he had just spoken. The whole amount, including every thing, of the expense that could fairly be charged to the sovereign did not exceed 409,000l., which, it would be seen, did not equal one-third of the whole of the civil list.

Having stated this, it would now be proper that the House should look at the debts of the civil list, and here it would be seen, that though some had originated in the personal expenses of the King, yet, that the great mass of them were not incurred by the sovereign, but arose out of the service of the country. One broad fact would serve to establish this, and to show how large the expenditure on the civil list for the public service was in some years when compared with what it was in others. In the estimates from 1804 to 1811, the average charge for foreign ministers did not exceed 200,000l. per annum. This was so low, in consequence of our being in those years almost entirely cut off from continental connexion; but now, from the changes in our political relations, there was an augmentation of not less than 150,000l. on this branch alone of the civil list. Of course this proceeded from the circumstance of our being at present in connexion with every part of the continent, instead of being in that situation to which he had just adverted. He, therefore, again asserted, that the accumulation of debt on the civil list, which had so often been animadverted upon, was occasioned, not by the excesses of the household department, but by the increased charges on those branches of it which were connected with the public expenditure of the country. He wished the House to take the charges of the fourth and fifth classes of the civil list into their consideration; to look at the provision made for the sovereign, including the junior branches of the royal family, and the present Windsor establishment. He wished them to do this, and then look at his estimates, and compare them with the burthens thrown on other countries for the maintenance of their respective royal families. If, for instance, they looked at France, they would find a sum of 24,000,000 of livres, about one million sterling, was set apart for the royal family. Of this sum no part was applicable to the public service, as well as to the royal expenditure; but it was distinctly appropriated to the royal family alone; and this sum was that which might fairly be compared with the 409,000l. of which he had spoken, and which were applied to the same purpose in this country. The junior branches of the French royal family were excluded from all participation in the 24,000,000 of livres; and they received largesses and other allowances from the country. There was another point of view in which this subject ought to be contemplated. It was necessary that it should be separated from those unfair imputations, almost amounting to calumny, which had been spread abroad on the subject of the increased expenses of royalty. It was painful to bring these under the notice of the House; but certainly it had been argued, as if there was something wrong in the administration of the civil list, merely from this fact, that it had been impossible to confine its expenditure within those limits within which the Crown had undertaken that it should be bounded. Surely it was unnecessary for him to say, that if the income of a private individual, or of a sovereign, had been fixed at a given sum fifty years ago, from the alterations which had taken place in the general condition of things it was impossible for either the one or the other to sustain his establishment as formerly without some assistance. To expect this would be absurd; as it would be to require an absolute impossibility. While on this subject, it ought always to be borne in mind, that from feelings of economy his majesty, in the early part of his reign, had consented that his civil list expenditure should be regulated on a principle different from that which had formerly been acted upon; and had accepted of a fixed revenue, in lieu of those improvable funds which had formerly been appropriated to the Crown. Had not this change been made, and had the King conducted the service of the civil list throughout the whole of his reign with those funds which had been provided for other sovereigns, and especially for his immediate predecessor, instead of coming to that House to ask them to discharge his debts, he would have been able to have avoided the necessity of such an appeal during the fifty six years of his reign, and not only would he have been able to avoid coming to parliament for the discharge of his debts, but there would have remained to him a surplus of 6,300,000l. In making this statement he took into the account the charges which would have fallen on the Crown had it made all those provisions for all the numerous branches of the royal family which had been made by parliament, and also all those charges which had been taken from the civil list and carried to the consolidated fund. Taking all these into the account, the Crown would have been able to meet them all out of those funds which it had formerly possessed, and which had been granted by parliament to king George 2nd. From this it would be seen that the public had gained by the arrangement which had been made with his majesty no less a sum than 6,300,000l. in the course of the present reign. The funds which in the reign of George 2nd, had been given to the civil list, were to be made good by parliament, if their produce fell short of 800,000l.; but should it exceed that amount, the surplus was to be given to the civil list, and was not to be considered applicable to the public service of the country; and thus a fructifying revenue had been put into the hands of the king. He stated this as a strong fact—not to lull the jealousy of the House on the subject of the civil list expenditure, nor to induce them to undervalue that economy which ought to regulate all their proceedings at a period like the present, but to dispel those clouds of misrepresentation and calumny which had been accumulated on the subject. He wished it to be known that the arrangement to which he had referred had proved most advantageous to the public, and that the increased charges which had accrued on various points of the civil list were unavoidable, and had absolutely arisen ex necessitate rei. This he thought it proper to state, that those who attempted to raise an outcry against the supposed extravagancies of royalty might be told, that a very small portion of the debts which had accumulated on the civil list originated in the immediate expenses of the sovereign.

Under these circumstances he proposed to move for leave to bring in a bill for the better regulation of the civil list, and in doing this, while opening the subject, he should divide it into three heads. In the first place he should take a retrospective view of the civil list expenditure for a series of years, and this he should compare with a view of its revenues. Under the second head he proposed to submit to the House the best prospective view he was able to afford of the probable future expenditure of the civil list, and to ascertain how far the funds appropriated to it were inadequate to the service for which they had been assigned, and how additional funds could be raised in a way most consistent with public economy. It was proper that he should here observe, that in all the reports which had been made, on the subject of the civil list from the year 1802, it had been admitted, that the revenue was incompetent to meet the expenditure, and that a period must arrive when parliament should take the whole question into consideration, in order to decide what steps it would be expedient to adopt, and how the deficiency could best be supplied. The period at which this inquiry should take place had been postponed to the termination of the war. It was deemed desirable that it should be discussed in peace rather than during the war, because it was thought so long as the war continued, extraordinary aids, such as droits, &c. would be derived from it to the Crown, which might make any new regulation for the time being unnecessary. It was on this principle that the delay in settling the civil list had occurred, though it had been well known for the last twelve years that some such arrangement was wanting. When, however, peace had arrived, the casual aids which had accrued to the Crown, of course, fell in, and it became necessary to equalize the revenue and the expenditure of the civil list. The third and last head on which he should speak, would be the prospective regulations which would be necessary for upholding the proper splendor of the Crown, which ought not to be reduced below that scale on which it had hitherto been maintained by the country, and which was consistent with the principles of the constitution, while, at the same time, all due regard ought to be had to economy, and every effort made to prevent as much waste as possible, in order to avoid a recurrence to parliament for further assistance. His object was, in short, to fix the expenditure of the civil list on such a footing, with respect to its income, as should offer to parliament the prospect of establishing it for a very extended period, on such a basis, that no further appeal to their liberality should be rendered necessary.

He should now proceed, in the first place, to take a retrospective view of the expenditure of the civil list. He wished to state what the expenditure had been for a number of years, right or wrong, and what had been the income set apart to meet it.

£.

The average expenditure of the seven years, up to 1811 inclusive, had amounted to

1,103,000

That of the year 1812 was

1,374,000

Of 1813

1,316,000

Of 1814

1,361,000

Of l815

1,436,000

And the year ending 5th Jan. 1816

1,480,000

During this period the revenues of the civil list, as he had already stated, were unequal to satisfy the demands they were intended to meet. In the seven years up to 1811, their average amount, under the settlement of 1804, was 995,000l. Since that period, from various circumstances, they had been swelled to 1,060,000l. It would be seen that the revenue, in the course of the seven years, had fallen short by about 1,000,000l.; and since that period the deficiency had considerably increased. On the face of this statement it would appear that there was a tendency in the settlement which had been made of the civil list to create debt. If the House looked to the reports of all the committees which had been appointed to inquire into this subject, it would be found, that every one of them had uniformly pronounced that the estimate of 1804 had been completely inadequate to its object, and was not in fact borne out either by those circumstances which had preceded, or by those which followed it. On all hands, the insufficiency of the civil list income had been allowed, and the augmentation of it had only been delayed on account of those casual aids derived from the war, of which he had already spoken. The gross amount of the debt which had accrued on the civil list since 1804, was 2,500,000l. The liberality of parliament had granted in discharge of that sum 762,000l. An advance made by the Crown from its West Indian revenues, and from the surplus of the Scotch civil list, to the amount of 1,738,000l. had still further reduced the debt. During the same period, it was to be recollected that the Crown out of the same funds (in the year 1807, he believed), had advanced the sum of 1,000,000l. for the service of the public, to meet the supplies of the year. If, instead of doing that, the Crown had applied this sum of one million to the discharge of the debt on the civil list, so far from having occasion to apply to parliament for assistance, that sum would have more than covered the whole of the remaining debt, and would have effectually prevented the inconvenient pressure which it had experienced. But it was not merely this sum of 1,000,000l. which had been advanced in 1807, that had been furnished for the public service, by the liberal consideration of the Crown—in the course of the war the sum of 2,800,000l. had been thus appropriated. These facts would go to prove, that if the Crown had been in possession of its former revenues, it would not have had occasion to approach parliament for any assistance. He wished the House to be aware, that if there had been a frequent recurrence to parliament, it arose from the misfortunes, not from the faults of the Crown; nay, he might say they grew out of its merit, in taking at a former period, a fixed income in lieu of the funds appropriated to it, which fixed income had proved inadequate to meet the charges thrown upon it. He had described the situation in which the civil list, down to the period at which the last report on this subject had been made, and from this it would be seen that a subsequent accumulation of debt was inevitable. Down to the 5th of last January, this situation of things had continued, and the debt incurred at that period amounted to 277,627l. This, however, had been discharged by a further advance out of the admiralty droits, as he showed from official documents, and he had no occasion to call on the House to make any provision for the liquidation of that debt which had existed at the period last mentioned. The noble lord then briefly recapitulated the substance of the statement which he had made—he re-stated what had been the average expenditure, and what the average revenue of the civil list in the seven years ending in 1811; he showed what had been the charges on it and the means of meeting them, in the years 1812, 1813, 1814, 1815, and 1816, and having anew described the former means of the Crown, and the recent burthens of the civil list, he proved that had the sovereign continued to possess the revenues which were formerly his, he could have met the whole of the demands referred to even on their late extended scale.

He now came to the second head, on which he proposed to offer some observations to the House; and in doing this, it would be his object to show, as nearly as he was able, what was likely to be the charge of the civil list prospectively, as far as a judgment could be formed upon it by those most conversant with the subject. Gentlemen were aware that an estimate had been framed on the best views that could then be taken of the question in the course of last year. That estimate had certainly been framed with reference to a period of war, and also in contemplation of the existing prices of the various commodities of necessary consumption. But though those were much greater than the prices of the present day, he did not think it fair to reckon on the continuance of the latter. It had however been thought proper that the subject should be re-examined, in order to ascertain what reduction could be effected. The amount of the estimate made last year was 1,478,682l. The gentlemen charged with the duty of making those inquiries, had included some services which it had not been thought advisable to retain in the present estimate, which was in consequence considerably below the former. That which he had now to propose amounted to 1,339,495l. This, compared with the estimate he had just mentioned of last year, presented a reduction of 139,000l. It was right that he should observe, that a double expense was in some instances incurred, from the situation in which the country stood with respect to the indisposition of his majesty. So long as the king remained in this unfortunate predicament, some additional services must necessarily be charged, which, under other circumstances, would not swell the civil list. Looking fairly at the subject, he considered the expenditure thence arising ought not to be deemed as that which would attach to the civil list in ordinary times. While we continued to have both a king de facto and a king de Jure, this double expense was inevitable. The 100,000l., therefore, which was thus thrown on the civil list, ought to be deducted from it prospectively, as also the 60,000l. for the privy purse; and with these the additional 10,000l. granted to her majesty in consequence of the situation of things at Windsor. Might not, then, the 170,000l. which had been granted by parliament in 1812 for the services last enumerated, and which Mr. Perceval had brought forward for the sanction of the House, be fairly taken from the permanent charge which his estimate would bring on the country? He therefore did not consider this estimate to be more than the fair mean between the charges which had been incurred on the civil list in the years to which he had referred. Deducting the 170,000l. for the Windsor establishment, the privy purse, and the allowance to her majesty from the 1,339,495l. which was the amount of his present estimate, it would be reduced to 1,169,495l. This as the medium between the charges that had occurred on the estimates of 1804 and 1811 was that to which he thought no objection could be made, and those estimates were the criterion by which he would wish it to be judged.

He then came to the question as to the proper mode of meeting the future expenditure of the civil list on the estimate which he had described. Parliament, he contended, had contemplated the necessity of augmenting the revenues of the civil list, not merely in the reports of its committees, which the right hon. gentleman opposite, and others, might maintain were not binding until they had been adopted by the House; but he thought an augmentation had been countenanced, if a direct sanction could not be proved to have been given by the House collectively; he meant in that law relating to the civil list which parliament had enacted, and which provided that whenever the expenditure should exceed the estimate of 1804 by 124,000l., or, what was the same thing, the estimate of 1811 by 10,000l., the subject was then to be brought before the House, in order that they might consider what steps it would, in consequence, be proper to adopt. He had already stated the average expense of the civil list from 1804 to 1811, to amount to 1,103,000l.; the difference between which and that which he took prospectively as the average of 1,168,000l., gave an addition of 65,000l.; being the increase which he now called for. If, then, an increase of 65,000l. over what had been the average expenditure up to 1811, was all that was demanded, he did not think the House would be surprised at the magnitude of the charge, when so many new expenses had been thrown on the civil list. At present he must however unite with his estimate the charge for the Windsor establishment, and the other expenses to be supported by the civil list; which brought it up to the sum he had before mentioned of 1,339,495l. The income of the civil list (taking the exchequer fees at 48,000l., and the Scotch fees 10,000l.), would amount to 1,088,000l. This revenue, compared with the prospective estimate of 1,339,495l. left a deficit of 251,000l. But from this 170,000l. as he had before stated, ought in fairness to be deducted as growing out of those circumstances, consequent on the malady of his majesty.

He should now submit to the House the consideration of the best way in which this deficiency of 251,000l. could be supplied. It appeared to him there were two modes in which this object might be accomplished—by voting an addition to the revenues of the civil list, or by withdrawing from it certain charges which would relieve it to that extent. He was very strongly disposed to recommend the adoption of the latter course. He did not wish to augment the revenues of the civil list, and he should therefore propose, that it should be relieved from burthens to the amount he had already mentioned, so as to leave it only liable to those which its income was sufficient to support. The House would feel all the embarrassment which must arise from leaving on the civil list charges for public services which could not, from their nature, be fixed, and of which a correct estimate could rarely be framed. The income assigned to the civil list thus circumstanced, must be enormously too large at one time, and totally inadequate to the demands made upon it at another. He therefore thought the House would concur with him in the propriety of withdrawing from the civil list those charges which were most uncertain in their extent, and which were most liable to fluctuation; for it must be evident that great inconvenience necessarily resulted from such a variation in the expense of any one branch of the public service as had occurred in that department with which he had the honour to be connected, and in which an increase of 150,000l., or even 200,000l. might occur in the course of a single year. He should now state from what classes of the civil list he proposed to make deductions. In the first place, he proposed to take from the expense of the civil list the sum of 30,500l. which he should carry to the consolidated fund, and which formed part of the provisions made by parliament for the junior branches of the royal family. This would in every respect be a desirable arrangement, as some inconvenience and confusion would be avoided in paying the whole of these allowances out of the consolidated fund. Last year it had been in contemplation to take from the civil list the 100,000l. now charged on it for the Windsor establishment; but a saving having occurred under this head the idea had been abandoned; and the plan which he had now suggested, would, he thought, be preferred. This adopted, it would be seen that on the demise of any of those illustrious personages their income would fall into the consolidated fund, and not into the civil list; and should a demise of the Crown take place, the whole arrangement would again come under the consideration of parliament. He next proposed to relieve the civil list by lightening it of some of the charges of the fourth class, under the head of the lord Chamberlain's department, which were extremely fluctuating, and not capable of being tied down by any fixed estimate. He recommended that 10,000l. charged for the board of works, which from the nature of the repairs for various public buildings which occasionally became necessary, frequently caused the estimate to be greatly exceeded. He wished also to take 15,000l. allowed for plate to foreign ambassadors. Both these charges it would be seen were necessarily fluctuating in their nature, and were, therefore, better detached from the civil list, and submitted separately to the arrangement with respect to them which the House might think proper to adopt. From the seventh class he would withdraw part of the salaries and allowances to certain officers and persons amounting to 3,268l. He would next propose to take from it that extremely fluctuating charge which came under the head of occasional payments. On this item he should gain 197,000l., which he would take instead of the sum of 278,000l., for the charge incurred under the head of occasional payments had been estimated last year at 278,000l. This calculation had been founded on the average of the preceding two years and three-quarters; but that having been a period of war, now that we were at peace, a reduction might be expected, and he would therefore take it at the sum he had mentioned. The whole of the sums which he had detailed, amounted to 255,768l. He had stated 251,000l. to be the sum from which he wished to relieve the civil list. Gaining the 255,768l. which he had just mentioned, the charge of 1,339,495l., which was the amount of his estimate, would be reduced to 1,083,000l. The income of the civil list he had stated to be 1,088,727l., and there was therefore a surplus of between 4 and 5,000l. In the third class, under the head of foreign mi- nisters, he proposed to effect a saving of 16,400l.; and a further saving of 10,000l. on account of consuls. By the arrangement which he should recommend for the foreign ministers, they would be protected from that inequality of income of which they had now frequent reason to complain, and while furnished with ample means for the discharge of their public functions, they would no longer be menaced by that private ruin to which their fortunes had been heretofore exposed. Within the last year inquiries had been instituted to ascertain the amount of the fees received by the British consuls at the various ports at which they were stationed. The result of the investigation led him to entertain a hope that, under this head a saving of 10,000l. might be effected, making, with the 16,400l. withdrawn from the foreign ministers, a total of 26,400l.

He now came to the savings in the branches more immediately connected with the household; and here he must declare, that he had no wish to popularise his majesty's ministers, by making a meagre provision for the civil list that would not be found adequate to carrying it through in future years. The estimate of the fourth class of expenses, which last year was 254,000l. would this year be 234,000l. being a reduction of 20,000l. This saving was independent of the 22,000l. for the princess Charlotte, and would be effected in the lord steward's department, the lord chamberlain's, and the master of the horse. In the lord chamberlain's department for the board of works, he should propose 40,000l., and 10,000l. for casual labour. The expense of the lord chamberlain's department was heretofore 85,000l. The department of the master of the horse had been 45,000l. last year, exclusive of 10,000l. for the princess Charlotte. Instead of this, he should take 40,000l., and thus the whole amount of the 4th class of expenses, instead of 254,000l. would be 234,000l. He should wish to compare this with the expense of the 4th class, for the seven years up to 1811; during which, the expense of that class would be found to have amounted to 259,000l. per annum, and for the two years up to 1816 to 270,000l.; and though it would now be only 234,000l., he felt he owed some explanation to the House, lest any suspicion should arise on the subject. The grounds on which he thought the service of that class might be performed for that sum were, first, the fall in prices; (though in regard to them, a mean must be taken, as it would be equally erroneous to make the highest or the lowest the standard of his calculation); secondly, the expenditure of the princess Charlotte was withdrawn from this class; but it was not till last year that her expenses had been made the subject of a separate charge; latterly, too, there had been a saving in the furnishing of the apartments of the junior branches of the royal family. Another and more adequate ground was, that a considerable sum had been laid out in the equipment of the royal household, for plate, furniture, and other articles, which was an expense that would not recur. Then, what he greatly calculated on was, the relief from uncertain expenses, which had formerly so much disturbed the economy of different departments. On these grounds he did hope, that, in recommending an estimate 20,000l. less than the former, he was not in any way misleading the House, but presenting a fair and deliberate calculation. He must here add, that some of the departments had been relieved from issues in kind, which had been committed for pecuniary allowances.

He should now refer to the fifth branch which comprehended all the other expense of the sovereign's establishments, except the privy purse. In this branch there had been in the late years an increase, compared with the year 1811; and in the last year there had been an increase of 2,400l. on account of some compensations made to the officers of the household, especially to the royal footmen, who had received in money a commutation for their fees in consequence of an Address from that House. Of this class the expense had increased from 137,000l. to 140,000l. Joining these two classes together, which comprehended the whole of the household expenditure, their average expense in the seven years ending in 1811, would be found to amount to 378,000l. The estimate of the last year to 392,000l. The estimate of the present year only 370,000l. Thus the prospective expense of the whole household was 8,000l. a year less than it had been in the seven years up to 1811, which were the last years of his majesty's expenditure. It was also to be recollected, that out of the calamity of Windsor, had arisen an additional expenditure. Because it was not to be expected that his Royal Highness, when he assumed the exercise of the royal authority, should turn away all his own domestics, or that the menial servants of his majesty should be dismissed without some compensation. The old and faithful servants of his majesty, who were no longer required at Windsor, were provided for by a scale of allowances, which had given rise to the additional expense of this part of the civil list. This would serve to repel the calumnies which had too often been thrown out by the enemies of royalty, that there had been any lavish or criminal expenditure. The right hon. gentleman (Mr. Tierney) with whom he had had some discussion on this subject, would allow, even though he should disapprove of the exact amount of the royal expenditure, that the increase under this head was but as a drop of water, compared with the other branches of public service which were charged upon the civil list. Both sides of the House would agree that the splendor of the throne should not be reduced, while it was desirable that the income applied to that purpose should be well administered. He hoped, therefore, that there would, at the end of this discussion, be less difference of opinion than there had been in the preliminary and interlocutory debates; and that the subject being purged of the calumnies which had obscured it, the House might arrive at a satisfactory decision. It was a painful situation for the monarch of this country, who felt necessarily anxious to preserve the good opinion of the people, to be obliged to apply to parliament for grants on account of expenses which were vulgarly deemed personal. He should here give an explanation, which had been on a former occasion required by the right hon. gentleman as to the reason why the estimate of the lord chamberlain's department, in which, during the quarter ending January last, there had been an excess, had not, according to law, been laid before the House. During that quarter, there had been in progress an expenditure at Brighton, occasioned by the establishment of his Royal Highness's household at that place, respecting which there had arisen a difficulty. It arose from this, that Brighton was not a royal palace, but the private property of the Prince Regent; however, it was a royal residence; the lord steward's department was extended to that place, and in a more limited degree in the lord chamberlain's department, there was an expense connected with it for furniture sent there. It was therefore referred to the treasury, to con- sider whether that expense should be charged to the account of the household. On the whole, the treasury was of opinion that it should not be charged upon the civil list, but should be defrayed from the droits of admiralty. He should lay before the House the minute of the treasury, explaining that transaction, and also an account of the droits, and he hoped, when they considered the difficulty that operated on the mind of the lord chamberlain, and the advice given by the treasury, the papers would prove satisfactory.

He should now recur to the third class, which included the expenses of that office over which he had the honour to preside—the foreign department. The total amount for this department in the present estimate was 226,950l., which was a saving of about 26,000l. compared with the amount of last year's expenditure. It was necessary for him to state, that the estimate this year was framed with a view to the extent of our foreign relations, which was never greater than at present. It might therefore in the course of events (however improbable at present) happen, that our foreign connexions might become less extensive. If, by any circumstances, our continental relations should be narrowed, then of course, a saving would take place in this branch. In contemplation of the possibility of such an event, it was his intention to introduce into the Bill which he proposed to bring into the House, a clause providing that in case a saving should take place upon this branch, the sum so saved should be applied to increase the surplus of the consolidated fund. With respect to the fifth class of expense, there had been an arrangement made, which could not have been proposed without the express desire and sanction of the Prince Regent. As this class comprehended the salaries of offices and the expense occasioned by the creation of new appointments, it was that to which the jealousy of parliament might be especially pointed. Under this head, his royal highness had directed that not more than a certain sum of new expense should be added yearly till the increased expense was reduced to that at which it was supposed it could be permanently carried on. The yearly sum above which no new expense was to be added to it, was 500l.; and this restriction would continue till the 140,000l. to which it had been raised on account of the allowances to the King's servants was reduced to 125,000l. It was also in con- temptation (while some new offices had unavoidably grown up) to lay aside all that it was possible to dispense with, in order to cover any expenses which might be thought advisable.

The next head under which a very great change would be made for the better, was in the class of Occasional Payments. They had all hitherto been defrayed out of the civil list, and the nature of these expenses never came into view. They had of late risen very high on account of the expense of foreign missions. In the last year this class had risen to 340,684l., and in the year before it had been 320,000l. This sum, however large it appeared, had rather fallen short of than exceeded the expense under this head in the years 1801, 2, and 3, in one of which years it had risen to 374,000l. and in another was 366,000l. He proposed for the future that this branch of expense should not be defrayed out of the civil list, but should be brought yearly under the vigilance of parliament. He should submit a vote of a competent sum for these payments beforehand, and if this sum was exceeded, it would be necessary to justify the accounts before the House, and show how the excess had been incurred. This would give the House a most potent hold on that expenditure, which, above all others, afforded a latitude to the discretion of the Crown.

The next head of the arrangements of the bill which he had to propose related to the auditing the civil list accounts. The House would see the essential necessity and fundamental wisdom of bringing this expenditure under some direct control. To this end it was necessary to propose the creation of a new officer, who should act as the representative of the treasury in the superintendance of this expenditure. He did not wish to shake the authority of the heads of the several departments, for all that shook that authority also weakened their responsibility. This officer would have the means of observing any expenditure while it was going on, and making representations to the treasury on the subject of any thing which appeared like extravagance. It was evident, that unless the audit of accounts, preceded or closely followed payment, so as to check the breach of regulations, they were of little use. The audits at present were defective as to the quarter in which they were placed, and as to time. In the lord steward's depart- ment, the head of that department audited and passed the accounts. In the departments of the chamberlain and the master of the horse, the accounts were audited before the commissioners of public accounts, but by reason of the mass of business with which those commissioners were overwhelmed, the last civil list account which had passed them was that for 1810 or 1811, and that for 1812 had been but now sent in. This system was most defective, and introduced a laxity and delay in making up the accounts. The officer whom he proposed to appoint would have all facilities of communicating with the different departments, and of calling the officers before him, and inspecting the accounts. This would throw on the treasury a responsibility which could not now be supposed to rest on it. This arrangement would not interfere with the comforts or dignity of the sovereign, to which it was necessary, that the sum appropriated to provide for them, should be well administered.

This was a general description of his plan; which, he hoped, would be found consistent with that liberality that was due to the Crown, and with that economy which was called for by the country. By granting to the Crown a proper fund, unconnected with those expenses that ought not, in justice, to be charged on it, they would put this difficult and interesting subject on as satisfactory a footing as its nature would admit. The secretary of state for the foreign department would, under the new arrangement, be placed in a more arduous situation than he ever before stood in. His responsibility would be greatly increased, when, year after year, he would be obliged to justify to the House the necessity of the different expenses in his department—which were of a description that gentlemen looked on with a more jealous eye than almost any other.—The Crown had been most unfairly, unjustly, and, unfortunately for the country (for any odium cast on the head of the government must be injurious to the country), been accused of profusion and extravagance. From this charge it was his duty to rescue the sovereign, and he hoped he had succeeded. In the bill which he was about to move for leave to bring in, there were two or three clauses, which, as they went to alter the present system, as supported by act of parliament, it would be necessary, in the first instance, to submit to a committee. He therefore meant to print the bill, without these clauses, which should also be printed, in a separate shape, and thus gentlemen would be enabled to judge accurately of the nature of the measure. There would also be placed in the hands of gentlemen the documents necessary for a just understanding of the question. The first was, " An account showing the total amount of the proceeds received from the droits of the Crown and admiralty since the 1st of January 1814 to the latest period to which the same can be made up; together with an account of the sums paid out of the droits since the same date; specifying by whom received, and on what account." The second was, " An estimate of the probable future annual charge upon the civil list, and also a statement of the amount of charge from which it is proposed to relieve each class of the civil list, comparing the same with the estimate presented in the last session of parliament." The last paper was " A copy of the treasury minute, dated 23d February 1816." The noble lord then concluded with moving, " That leave be given to bring in a bill for the better regulation of the civil list."

expressed his determination, notwithstanding the measure introduced by the noble lord, to redeem the pledge he had given to the House, on the subject of the civil list. He should at present say little on the subject, as the question would, on Monday, be fully discussed. He would not then offer any objection to the bill, but he did not thereby pledge himself not to oppose it, if necessary, at a future period. He complained of the manner in which the noble lord introduced papers to the House. They never were produced till it was too late in the session to make use of them. A month ago he moved for an account of the droits of the Crown, which was ready since the 23rd of February, but it was not forthcoming until the noble lord had made his motion; and it then seemed to be produced for the purpose of creating embarrassment. The correspondence, relative to the estimate of the civil list expenditure, for the quarter ending in January last, was also ready on the 23rd of February; and now, for the first time, the noble lord thought fit to produce it. What answer did the noble lord make when called upon to produce this paper, which he admitted was ready on a former occasion? Why, forsooth, that he did not wish to present it till he could accompany it with an explanation of his own; and yet, now that he had presented it, his own explanation was perfectly unintelligible; and at last he was obliged to refer to the paper itself. Thus he (Mr. Tierney), after all the trouble and pains he had taken to make himself acquainted with the estimates upon this subject, had now his work to do over again, and had between this and Monday to devote himself, night and day, to examine the new estimates of the noble lord. Therefore he should be under the necessity of bespeaking the indulgence of the House, in consequence of the embarrassment to which he was subjected by the very extraordinary proceeding of the noble lord. But such a proceeding was not more inconvenient to him than to the House generally; for the information requisite to a correct understanding of the subject to which he thought it proper to call its attention, was thus wantonly withheld, until it became impossible fully to examine that information. The right hon. member concluded with observing, that his only object upon this occasion was that which the noble lord himself professed, namely, to discharge his duty to the country and to the Crown, by providing such an arrangement with regard to the civil list as should be suitable to the resources of the people and to the splendour of the Crown.

said, that of all questions that could be brought before the House, the civil list was that which it would be most unfair and improper to discuss in parts, instead of looking at it as a whole. There was certainly, therefore, no just ground for complaint on the part of the right hon. gentleman opposite, as to the rejection of those motions, the object of which was the partial discussion of this question. He was sure the House would acquit him of any intention of embarrassing the question. The right hon. gentleman, however, exaggerated when he talked of the disadvantage under which he laboured from the time at which the accounts were laid before the House; for he would venture to say, that when the right hon. gentleman looked at the accounts, he was so thoroughly master of the subject that he would understand them in ten minutes.

said, that he did not wish the House to adopt the mere assertions of the noble lord and himself. This was not the way in which the question ought to be argued. It was probable that he himself might speedily arrive at a knowledge of the facts; but he doubted very much whether he should be able to make the House understand them. There were very few gentlemen who had paid much attention to this intricate subject, and, from the course which had been pursued, he was afraid that the House would not come to the discussion with sufficient information.

rose to enter his protest against the doctrine of the noble lord, that the droits of the admiralty should be deemed the private property of the Crown, as well as against other principles advanced by the noble lord in the course of his long speech. Into the discussion of those principles, he however did not at present propose to enter. But as to the noble lord's expression, that the civil list expenditure had a tendency to outgrow the parliamentary allowance, he must observe, that according to his judgment and the decision of common sense, the only way to check that tendency—the only way to prevent those connected with the civil list from contracting debts—was to resolve not to pay them. This would be the effectual mode of guarding against any excess in the civil list, and ministers should be rendered responsible for the expenditure of the public money in this department. If ministers were called upon to exercise a due degree of vigilance upon this subject—if they were really responsible—then the House and the country would have some security against the recurrence of those excesses in the civil list, which had so frequently taken place, especially of late years. The hon. baronet said, he approved of the proposed separation of the provisions for the several members of the royal family from the other branches of the civil list expenditure. The noble lord had detailed the mistakes of several administrations with respect to the civil list—those mistakes involving, in fact, a violation of law. But while those mistakes were not visited by any punishment, what security could the country have, that the proposed law would not be also set at nought, if ministers were not rendered really responsible for its execution? If the provisions of what was called Mr. Burke's bill had been attended to, no excess would have accrued upon the civil list; and what assurance had the House or the country that the noble lord's bill would be a jot more efficient than that brought forward by Mr. Burke, unless ministers were bound to enforce its execution, and unless ministerial responsibility was rendered something more than a mere name? For otherwise it would be absurd to calculate upon the efficiency of any legislative measure upon this subject. The hon. baronet concluded with repeating his protest against the doctrine of the noble lord, that the droits of admiralty were not regarded as public property, as well as against other principles incidentally introduced by the noble lord in the course of his speech. He trusted that, when the matter came to be discussed, the House would give the utmost attention to a subject of such vital importance to the country.

Leave was then given to bring in the bill.

Papers Relating to the Civil List, and the Droits of the Crown and Admiralty

The following Papers referred to in the course of the preceding debate, were presented to the House, by command of the Prince Regent:

An ESTIMATE of the probable future Annual Charge upon the CIVIL LIST;—and also, a Statement of the Amount of Charge from which it is proposed to relieve each CLASS of the CIVIL LIST; comparing the same with the Estimate presented in the last Session of Parliament.

CLASSES.

ESTIMATE of the probable future Annual Charge.

AMOUNT of Charge from which it is proposed to relive the Civil List.

FIRST CLASSES:

£.

s.

d.

£.

s.

d.

Pensions and Allowances to the Royal Family

298,000

0

0

30,500

0

0

SECOND CLASS:

Allowances to the Lord Chancellor, Judges, amp;c.

32,955

0

0

THIRD CLASS:

Allowances to Foreign Ministers, including Pensions to Foreign Ministers, and Salaries to Consuls

226,950

0

0

FOURTH CLASS:

Bills of his Majesty's Tradesmen

209,000

0

0

25,000

0

0

FIFTH CLASS:

Salaries to the Departments of the Lord Chamberlain, Lord Steward, Master of the Horse, Master of the Robes, and Surveyor General of Works, including Compensations, and Superannuation Allowances payable within those departments

140,700

0

0

SIXTH CLASS:

Pensions limited by Act 22 Geo. 3, cap. 82

95,000

0

0

SEVENTH CLASS:

Salaries and Allowances to certain Officers and Persons

41,300

0

0

3,268

0

0

EIGHTH CLASS:

Salaries to the Commissioners of the Treasury and Chancellor of the Exchequer.

13,822

0

0

Occasional Payments, not comprised in any of the aforegoing Classes

26,000

0

0

197,000

0

0

£.

1,083,727

0

0

255,768

0

0

FIRST CLASS.

An ESTIMATE of the probable future Annual Charge upon the CIVIL LIST, in respect of Pensions and Allowances to the Royal Family; and also a Statement of the Amount of Charge, from which it is proposed to relieve the CIVIL LIST.

ESTIMATE of the probable future Annual Charge.

AMOUNT of Charge proposed to be transferred to the Consolidate Fund.

£.

s.

d.

£.

s.

d.

Allowance for his Majesty's Establishment at Windsor, per Act 52 Geo.3, cap. 8.

100,000

0

0

His Majesty's Privy Purse

60,000

0

0

Her Majesty the Queen

58,000

0

0

Her Majesty the Queen additional Allowance, per Act 52 Geo. 3, c. 8.

10,000

0

0

Privy Purse of his Royal Highness the Prince Regent

60,000

0

0

Allowance to his Royal Highness the Prince Regent

10,000

0

0

Allowance to his Royal Highness the Duke of York

12,000

0

0

Allowance to his Royal Highness the Duke of Clarence

2,500

0

0

Allowance to her Royal Highness the Princess Augusta Sophia

4,000

0

0

Allowance to her Royal Highness the Princess Elizabeth

4,000

0

0

Allowance to her Royal Highness the Princess Mary

4,000

0

0

Allowance to her Royal Highness the Princess Sophia

4,000

0

0

Total, First Class £.

298,000

0

0

30,500

0

0

SECOND CLASS.

An ESTIMATE of the probable future Annual Charge upon the CIVIL LIST, in respect of Allowances to the Lord Chancellor; Speaker of the House of Commons; Judges of the Courts of King's Bench and Common Pleas; Barons of the Exchequer, and Justices of the Courts of Great Session in Wales.

ESTIMATE of the probable future Annual Charge.

£.

s.

d.

Lord Chancellor

5,000

0

0

Speaker of the House of Commons

1,825

0

0

Judges of the Court of King's Bench

8,500

0

0

Judges of the Court of Common Pleas

7,500

0

0

Barons of the Exchequer

6,500

0

0

Chief and Second Justices of Chester

1,230

0

0

Justices of the Court of Great Session in Wales

2,400

0

0

Total, Second Class £.

32,955

0

0

THIRD CLASS.

An ESTIMATE of the probable future Annual Charge upon the CIVIL LIST, in respect o Allowances to Foreign Ministers, including Pensions to Foreign Ministers, and Salaries to Consuls.

AMBASSADORS.

Salary.

Outfit.

House Rent.

FIRST CLASS.

£.

s.

d.

£.

s.

d.

£.

s.

d.

Paris

11,000

0

0

4,000

0

0

Secretary of Embassy

1,100

0

0

400

0

0

St. Petersburgh

11,000

0

0

4,000

0

0

1,000

0

0

Secretary of Embassy

1,100

0

0

400

0

0

Vienna

11,000

0

0

4,000

0

0

1,000

0

0

Secretary of Embassy

1,100

0

0

400

0

0

Madrid

11,000

0

0

4,000

0

0

1,000

0

0

Secretary of Embassy

1,100

0

0

400

0

0

Netherlands

11,000

0

0

4,000

0

0

1,000

0

0

Secretary of Embassy

1,100

0

0

400

0

0

SECOND CLASS.

Constantinople

8,000

0

0

3,000

0

0

Secretary of Embassy

1,000

0

0

300

0

0

Oriental Secretary

1,000

0

0

ENVOYS EXTRAORDINARY AND MINISTERS PLENIPOTENTIARY.

THIRD CLASS.

Prussia

7,000

0

0

2,500

0

0

500

0

0

Secretary of Legation

700

0

0

250

0

0

FOURTH CLASS.

Portugal

5,500

0

0

2,000

0

0

500

0

0

Secretary of Legation

550

0

0

200

0

0

Two Sicilies

5,500

0

0

2,000

0

0

500

0

0

Secretary of Legation

550

0

0

200

0

0

America

5,500

0

0

2,000

0

0

500

0

0

Secretary of Legation

550

0

0

200

0

0

FIFTH CLASS.

Sweden

4,500

0

0

2,000

0

0

400

0

0

Secretary of Legation

500

0

0

200

0

0

Bavaria

4,500

0

0

2,000

0

0

400

0

0

Secretary of Legation

500

0

0

200

0

0

Denmark

4,500

0

0

2,000

0

0

400

0

0

Secretary of Legation

500

0

0

200

0

0

Sardinia

4,500

0

0

2,000

0

0

400

0

0

Secretary of Legation

500

0

0

200

0

0

ENVOYS EXTRAORDINARY.

SIXTH CLASS.

Wirtemberg

3,600

0

0

1,500

0

0

300

0

0

Secretary of Legation

500

0

0

150

0

0

Tuscany

3,600

0

0

1,500

0

0

300

0

0

Secretary of Legation

500

0

0

150

0

0

Swisserland

3,600

0

0

1,500

0

0

300

0

0

Secretary of Legation

500

0

0

150

0

0

Saxony

3,600

0

0

1,500

0

0

300

0

0

Secretary of Legation

500

0

0

150

0

0

SEVENTH CLASS.

Hamburgh

2,800

0

0

1,000

0

0

300

0

0

Secretary of Legation

300

0

0

100

0

0

£.

135,850

0

0

51,150

0

0

9,100

0

0

Estimated Annual Amount of Salary £.

135,850

0

0

for House Rent

9,100

0

0

Pensions to Foreign Ministers

52,000

0

0

Salaries to Consuls

30,000

0

0

226,950

0

0

FOURTH CLASS.

An ESTIMATE of the probable future Annual Charge upon the CIVIL LIST, in respect of the Bills of his Majesty's Tradesmen in the Department of the Lord Steward, Lord Chamberlain, Master of the Horse, Master of the Robes, and Surveyor General of Works; and also a Statement of the Amount of Charge from which it is proposed to relieve the CIVIL LIST.

ESTIMATE of the probable future Annual Charge.

AMOUNT of charge proposed to be defrayed by Grants of Parliament.

£.

s.

d.

£.

s.

d.

Lord Steward

85,000

0

0

Lord Chamberlain

40,000

0

0

*15,000

0

0

Master of the Horse

40,000

0

0

Master of the Robes

4,000

0

0

Surveyor General of Works

‡40,000

0

0

†10,000

0

0

Total, Fourth class £.

209,000

0

0

25,000

0

0

*This sum of 15,000l. is the estimated Amount of the future Charge, in respect of Furniture and various other Articles, heretofore supplied by the Lord Chamberlain's Department to certain Public Offices; also the Expense of Plate, &c. for his Majesty's Foreign Ministers and Governors; Collars, Badges, and Mantles of the several Orders of the Garter, Bath, and Thistle; silver Trumpets for the Life Guards and Horse Guards Blue; gold Chains, Badges, and Mantles of the Officers of the several Orders; silver Collars and embroidered Coats for the Heralds; Furniture for the Royal Yachts, and Triennial and Septennial Services for the Drummers, and Royal Standards for the Life and Foot Guards.

† This sum of 10,000l. is the estimated Amount of the future Charge for the Repairs of the several Public Offices and Buildings at the Tower, Whitehall, and Westminster; and also the necessary Works and Repairs in Saint James's Park, and the private Roads heretofore defrayed out of the Civil List.

‡ This sum of 40,000l. is the estimated Charge for Repairs and necessary Alterations at the several Royal Palaces, &c. at Richmond, Kew, Kew House, &c. Queen's Palace, Carlton House, Mews, Kensington Palace and Gardens, Windsor Castle and Queen's Lodge; Hampton Court Palace and House Park, and Saint James's Palace. It is also proposed in the event of any new Buildings being to be undertaken, or of any very extensive Repairs beyond what the present Estimate is calculated to cover, that an Estimate of the Expense should be submitted to Parliament previously to the commencement of the Work, in order that their sanction for the same may be obtained, and provision made for defraying the Expense of its execution.

FIFTH CLASS.

An ESTIMATE of the probable future Annual Charge upon the CIVIL LIST, in respect of the Salaries, Compensation and Superannuation Allowances in the Departments of the Lord Steward, Lord Chamberlain, Master of the Horse, Master of the Robes, and Surveyor General of Works; also for the Salaries of certain other Officers of his Majesty's Household.

LORD STEWARD'S DEPARTMENT:

£.

s.

d.

£.

s.

d.

Lord Steward's Salary, paid at the Exchequer

1,540

0

0

Salaries, and Compensation and Superannuation Allowances, payable in the Department

40,326

10

0

41,866

10

0

LORD CHAMBERLIAN'S DEPARTMENT:

Lord Chamberlain's Salary, paid at the Exchequer

3,000

0

0

Vice-Chamberlain's Salary Exchequer

600

0

0

Groom of the Stole Salary Exchequer

2,000

0

0

Twelve Gentlemen of the Bedchamber Exchequer

12,000

0

0

Thirteen Grooms of the Bedchamber Exchequer

6,500

0

0

Apothecary to his Majesty Exchequer

115

0

0

Apothecary to the Household Exchequer

53

6

8

Salaries, and Compensation and Superannuation Allowances, payable in the Department

34,793

14

0

59,062

0

8

DEPARTMENT OF THE MASTER OF THE HORSE:

Salaries, and Compensation and Superannuation Allowances, payable in the Department

27,743

0

0

DEPARTMENT OF THE MASTER OF THE ROBES:

Salaries, payable in this Department

1,080

0

0

DEPARTMENT OF SURVEYOR GENERAL OF WORKS:

Salaries, and Compensation and Superannuation Allowances, payable in this Department

10,946

6

3

Total, Fifth Class £.

140,697

16

11

SIXTH CLASS.

An ESTIMATE of the probable future Annual Charge upon the CIVIL LIST, in respect of Pensions limited by Act 22 Geo. III. cap. 82.

Pensions without Fees, formerly paid at the Treasury

£. 95,000

Pensions formerly paid by the Paymaster of Pensions, in lieu of Apartments at Somerset Place

Pensions to the Servants of the late Queen Caroline, and late Princess of Wales

Pensions by Patent and Privy Seal

Pensions by Sign Manual

Contingent Expenses

SEVENTH CLASS.

An ESTIMATE of the probable future Annual Charge upon the CIVIL LIST, in respect of Salaries and Fees of sundry Public Officers, and Annuities and Payments for various Purposes; and also a Statement of the Amount of Charge from which it is proposed to relieve the CIVIL LIST.

ESTIMATE of the probable future Annual Charge.

AMOUNT of Charge from which it is proposed to relieve the Civil List.

£.

s.

d.

Lord President of the Council

4,000

0

0

£.

s.

d.

First Clerk of the Council

250

0

0

One do

100

0

0

Keeper of the Council Chamber

36

10

0

Keeper of the Council at 2s. 6d. per day

45

12

6

432

2

6

Lord Privy Seal

3,000

0

0

Constable of Dover Castle

4,100

0

0

Governor of Windsor Castle

182

10

0

Master of the Hawks

1,372

10

0

Chief Justice in Eyre, North of Trent

2,250

0

0

Chief Justice in Eyre, South of Trent

2,316

13

4

Chancellor of the Garter

570

5

0

University of Oxford, for a Preacher Perpetuity

10

0

0

Professor of Divinity Perpetuity

13

6

8

Law

40

0

0

Physic

40

0

0

History

400

0

0

Botany

200

0

0

University of Cambridge, on a Perpetuity

10

0

0

for a Preacher

10

0

0

Professor of Divinity

13

6

8

Law

40

0

0

Physic

40

0

0

History

400

0

0

Botany

200

0

0

Emanuel College, Cambridge Perpetuity

16

13

4

Dean and Chapter of Litchfield do

10

0

0

Vicar of Litchfield

15

0

0

Master of the Temple

37

6

8

Reader at Hampton Court Chapel

40

0

0

Fellows of Eton College Perpetuity

42

0

0

ESTIMATE of the probable future Annual Charge.

AMOUNT of Charge from which it is proposed to relieve the Civil List.

£.

s.

d.

Dean and Chapter of Westminster for French Ministers, Savoy

60

0

0

Ministers, Isle of Man

100

0

0

Bishop of Chester, for four Preachers

200

0

0

Vicar of the Tower Perpetuity

6

13

4

Minister of St. Botolph, Aldgate do

7

0

0

Churchwardens of St. John the Baptist, Perpepetuity for relief of the Poor

7

13

4

Churchwardens of. St. Michael, Cornhill Perpepetuity for relief of the Poor

12

4

0

Churchwardens of St. Magnus Perpepetuity for relief of the Poor

21

4

8

Schoolmaster of Southell Perpetuity

10

0

0

Corporation of Dartmouth Perpetuity

40

0

0

Mayor of Macclesfield

50

0

0

Corporation of Lyme Regis

100

0

0

Corporation for repairing the Pier

100

0

0

Corporation of Berwick for repairing the Bridge

100

0

0

Christ's Hospital

370

10

0

Representatives of Sir John Hynde Cotton Perpetuity

5

6

8

Heirs of Colonel Fairfax Perpetuity

100

0

0

Heirs of Nicholas Yates

100

0

0

Astronomer Royal.

250

0

0

420

0

0

Astronomer in further Augmentation of his Assistant's Salary

170

0

0

Housekeeper at Westminster

9

2

6

Keeper of the Lions in the Tower, including extra Allowance for the Maintenance of the Animals

450

0

0

Knight Harbinger

195

16

8

Latin Secretary

280

0

0

Examiner of Plays

400

0

0

Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod

200

0

0

Master of the Mechanics

150

0

0

Engraver of Seals

50

0

0

Keeper of the Tennis Courts

132

3

4

OFFICERS OF THE CEREMONIES.

Marshal of the Ceremonies

100

0

0

Assistant Master of do

121

13

4

Master of the Ceremonies

200

0

0

Master of the in lieu of Bills

100

0

0

521

13

4

BATH OFFICERS.

Genealogist of the Order of the Bath

100

0

0

Bath King at Arms

90

0

0

Secretary to the Order of the Bath

90

0

0

Register to the Order of the Bath

90

0

0

Gentleman Usher to the Order of the Bath

90

0

0

Messenger to the Order of the Bath

40

0

0

500

0

0

KINGS AND HERALDS AT ARMS.

4 Pursuivants at Arms

80

0

0

8 Heralds at £.26. 13s. 4d. each

213

6

8

3 Kings at Arms

120

0

0

Garter King at Arms

100

0

0

513

6

8

ESTIMATE of the probable future Annual Charge.

AMOUNT of Charge from which it is proposed to relieve the Civil List.

BAND OF GENTLEMEN PENSIONERS.

£.

s.

d.

Gentleman Harbinger of the Band of Pensioners

70

0

0

40 Gentlemen, Band of Pensioners, £.100 each

4,000

0

0

Clerk of the Cheek of Pensioners, £.100 each

120

0

0

Standard Bearer of Pensioners, £.100 each

310

0

0

Lieutenant of Bearer of Pensioners, £.100 each

500

0

0

Captain of Pensioners, £.100 each

1,000

0

0

6,000

0

0

KEEPERS OF RECORDS.

Keeper of the Records at the Tower

1,435

16

0

500 0 0

Keeper to pay Fees on above Salary

169 4 0

Keeper for 3 Clerks 766 12 0

Keeper of the Council Records

500

0

0

Keeper of the Records at Whitehall

160

0

0

Keeper of the Records of Forfeited Estates

200

0

0

State Paper Office

970

0

0

Keeper of the Records in the Court of Exchequer

900

0

0

4,165

16

0

OFFICERS OF THE COURTS OF EXCHEQUER AND COMMNON PLEAS.

Cursitor Baron of the Court of Exchequer

263

6

8

Solicitor to the Court of Exchequer

150

0

0

Treasurer's Remembrancer

64

2

1

Two Secondaries in the Office of Exchequer

9

0

0

Second Secondary in the Office of Exchequer

26

13

4

Clerks in Secondary in the Office of Exchequer

11

5

0

Foreign Apposer

40

0

0

Clerk of the Foreign Estreats in the Court of Exchequer

96

13

4

Clerk of the Nichills

20

0

0

Clerk of the Pleas

6

10

0

King's Remembrancer

55

17

4

Clerks in the Office of Exchequer

7

13

4

Secondaries in the Office of Exchequer

8

0

0

11 Masters in Chancery

1,100

0

0

Clerk of the Hanaper, for the Expense of that Office

2,000

0

0

20 King's Counsel £.40 per annum each

800

0

0

Attorney General

81

6

8

Solicitor General

70

0

0

King's Prime Serjeant

41

6

10

10 Serjeants at Arms, at £.100 7s.6d. each

1,003

15

0

King's Clerk in the Crown Office

50

0

0

Clerk of the Foreign Estreats, Court of Common Pleas

20

0

0

Advocate General

20

0

0

5,945

9

7

ESTIMATE of the probable future Annual Charge.

AMOUNT of Charge from which it is proposed to relieve the Civil List.

PIPE OFFICERS.

£.

s.

d.

£.

s.

d.

Clerk of the Pipe

107

4

2

Controller of the Pipe

40

0

0

Two Secondaries in the Pipe Office

20

0

0

Clerks in the Pipe Office

4

11

8

171

15

10

British Museum

300

0

0

OFFICERS OF THE ORDNANCE.

Master of the Ordnance

175

18

4

Lieutenant General of the Ordnance

66

13

4

urveyor General of the Ordnance

36

10

0

Clerk of the Ordnance

36

10

0

Storekeeper of the Ordnance

54

15

0

Clerk of the Deliveries

18

5

0

Treasurer of the Ordnance

40

0

0

OFFICERS OF THE RECEIPT OF EXCHEQUER.

Two Chamberlains of the Exchequer

104

6

8

Two Deputy Chamberlains for striking Tallies

20

0

0

Two Deputy Chamberlains on their Allowance

80

0

0

Senior Deputy Chamberlain

40

0

0

Two other Deputy Chamberlains for joining Tallies

10

0

0

Senior Teller of the Exchequer

33

6

8

One of the Tellers of the Exchequer

31

13

4

4 Messengers of the Exchequer, at 4½. per day

27

7

4

4 Messengers on their Allowance of £.12 10s. per month

600

0

0

Two Grooms of the Exchequer, at 20s. a-year

2

0

0

Porter at the Exchequer Gate

20

0

0

Officers of the Exchequer on their ancient Fee (Clericus et Ministris)

30

0

0

Exchequer Watchmen

438

0

0

Salaries formerly paid to the under-mentioned Officers of the Exchequer, but now payable to the Chief Clerk of the Pells, Receiver of Fees, per Act 23 Geo. III.

To the Auditor, on his Fee

260

3

4

To the Auditor, on his additional Allowance

200

0

0

To the Auditor, for his 1st Clerk, on his additional Allowance

100

0

0

To the Auditor, for a Clerk in the Tally Court, on his Fee

36

10

0

To the Auditor, for keeping a Register on the Public Loans

50

0

0

To the Auditor, on his Fee

20

0

0

To the Clerk of the Pells, on his Allowance

195

8

4

To the Clerk of the Pells, on his Fee

5

0

0

To the Clerk of the Pells, for a Clerk on his Allowance

172

6

8

To the Clerk of the Pells, for one of the Four Tellers

31

13

4

To the Clerk of the Pells, for another of the Four Tellers

31

13

4

Total, Seventh Class £.

41,297

10

1

3,268

0

0

EIGHTH CLASS.—AN ESTIMATE of the probable future Annual Charge upon the CIVIL LIST, in respect of the Salaries to the Commissioners of the Treasury, and Chancellor of the Exchequer.

Commissioners of the Treasury

8,000

0

0

First Commissioner of Treasury

4,022

0

0

Chancellor of the Exchequer

1,800

0

0

Total, Eighth class £.

13,822

0

0

OCCASIONAL PAYMENTS.

An ESTIMATE of the probable future Annual Charge upon the CIVIL LIST, in respect of Occasional Payments not comprised in any of the aforegoing CLASSES; and also a Statement of the probable future Amount of Charge from which it is proposed to relieve the CIVIL LIST.

ESTIMATE of probable future Annual Charge.

AMOUNT of Charge proposed to be defrayed by Grants of Parliament.

£.

s.

d.

£.

s.

d.

Special Service and Royal Bounty

10,000

0

0

Home Secret Service

10,000

0

0

Lord Almoner, for Alms

1,119

0

0

Archbishop of York, for Charities and Arabic Professors

900

0

0

Chamberlain of London, for the Poor of that City

1,000

0

0

Chelsea Waterworks, for supplying the Treasury

52

14

0

Fees, &c. on the Receipt of the Privy Purse of his Majesty, and of his Royal Highness the Prince Regent

522

0

0

His Majesty's Charity to Female Objects in Distress

1,202

2

6

Chairman of the Westminster Sessions, for Dinners

214

3

0

Mayor, Aldermen, and Sheriffs of London, for Impost on Wine

100

16

0

Incidental Expenses of the Treasury

5,000

0

0

Deficiency of Fees of the Treasury

22,000

0

0

Deficiency of Fees—Secretaries of State—Home Department

14,000

0

0

Foreign Departments

16,000

0

0

War and Colonies

6,000

0

0

Deficiency of Fees—Council Office

15,000

0

0

Contingent Expenses of the State Paper Office

600

0

0

Contingent Expenses of the Record Office, Tower

600

0

0

Outfit to Ministers at Foreign Courts

10,000

0

0

Extra Extraordinary Disbursements, &c. of his Majesty's Ministers and Consuls at Foreign Courts

50,000

0

0

Presents to the Ministers of Foreign Powers

15,000

0

0

Three Secretaries of State—Contingencies

21,000

0

0

Three Secretaries of State— Messengers

18,000

0

0

Bailiff of the Tower—Contingent Disbursements

400

0

0

Lord Chamberlain, to pay Messengers Bills

1,600

0

0

Messengers of the Exchequer—Travelling Charges

1,500

0

0

Deputy Chamberlain of the Exchequer, and Officers of the Tally Court for striking Tallies

300

0

0

Total, Occasional Payments £.

25,110

15

6

197,000

0

0*

*Note.—The Estimate of these Charges has been framed with a view to their probable Amount in time of Peace; but from the Nature of the Services, they are liable to much Fluctuation; it is therefore proposed, that a Vote should be submitted for a Sum in gross, under the term " Civil Contingencies," out of which these Charges should be paid, and the Account of which should be submitted to Parliament.

COMPARE between the ESTIMATE of 1804, the Average Expenditure for 7 Years to 5th July 1811, the Average Annual Expenditure for 2¾ Years to the 5th January 1815, and the proposed future Charge upon the CIVIL LIST, according to the ESTIMATE submitted to the Committee upon the CIVIL LIST in 1815, and the Charge upon the CIVIL LIST according to the proposed ESTIMATE; also a Statement of the Amount from which it is proposed to relieve the CIVIL LIST.

ESTIMATE of 1804.

Average Annual Expenditure, 7 Years to 5th July 1811.

Average Annual Expenditure, 2 Years and three quarters to 5th January 1815.

ESTIMATE 1815.

Proposed Esttmate.

AMOUNT of Charge from which it is proposed to relieve the Civil List.

Estimate 1815.

AMOUNT of Charge from which it was proposed to relieve the Civil List.

£.

s.

d.

£.

s.

d.

£.

s.

d.

£.

s.

d.

£.

s.

d.

£.

s.

d.

£.

s.

d.

FIRST CLASS:—Pensions and Allowances to the Royal Family

222,500

0

0

220,640

0

0

334,500

0

0

198,000

0

0

136,500

0

0

298,000

0

0

30,500

0

0

SECOND CLASS:—Allowances to the Lord Chancellor, Judges, —amp;c.

32,955

0

0

32,870

0

0

32,854

0

0

32,955

0

0

32,955

0

0

THIRD CLASS:—Allowance to Foreign Ministers

112,330

0

0

82,060

0

0

115,872

0

0

Pensions to:— (formerly part of 6th Class)

27,412

0

0

52,700

0

0

56,056

0

0

253,300

0

0

226,950

0

0

FOURTH CLASS:—Bills of his Majesty's Tradesmen

172,505

19

4

259,933

0

0

360,924

0

0

229,300

0

0

25,000

0

0

209,000

0

0

25,000

0

0

FIFTH CLASS:—Salaries to the Departments of the Lord Chamberlain, Lord Steward, Master of the Horse, Master of the Robes (forming 5th Class)

98,542

0

5

102,237

0

0

111,630

0

0

Salaries in the Lord Chamberlain's Department, and Office of Works (formerly part of the 7th Class)

7,058

8

4

6,682

0

0

3,960

0

0

137,858

6

8

140,700

0

0

Compensation and Superannuation Allowances (forming part of the 6th Class)

11,258

12

0

10,100

0

0

11,644

0

0

SIXTH CLASS:—Pensions (a part only of the former 6th Class)

92,582

4

4

86,391

0

0

87,160

0

0

95,000

0

0

95,000

0

0

SEVETH CLASS:—Salaries and Allowances to sundry Persons (a part only of the former 7th Class)

48,339

19

9

48,710

0

0

46,464

0

0

41,298

0

0

2,539

9

0

41,300

0

0

3,268

0

0

EIGHT CLASS:—Salaries to the Commissioners of the Treasury

13,822

0

0

13,310

0

0

13,452

0

0

13,822

0

0

13,822

0

0

Occasional Payments

139,737

6

7

187,050

0

0

323,270

0

0

35,110

0

0

278,000

0

0

26,000

0

0

197,000

0

0

£.

979,043

10

9

1,102,683

0

0

1,497,786

0

0

1,036,643

6

8

442,039

9

0

1,083,727

0

0

255,768

0

0

1,036,643

6

8

1,0837,27

0

0

Estimate, 1815

1,478,682

15

8

Estimate, 1816£.

1,339,495

0

0

Estimate, 1816

1,339,495

0

0

Present Estimate, less than that of 1815, by £.

139,187

15

8

Whitehall Treasury Chambers,

(Signed) C. ARBUTHNOT.

May 3, 1816

An ACCOUNT showing the total Amount of the PROCEEDS received from the DROITS OF THE CROWN, and ADMIRALTY, since the 1st of January 1814, to the latest period to which the same can be made up;—together with, An Account of the Sums paid out of the Droits since the same date, specifying by whom received, and on what Account.

No. 1.—State of DROITS arising to his Majesty, either in right of his Crown, or as Droits and Perquisites in his Office of Admiralty; showing the Receipts and Payments, in respect thereof, by the Registrar of the High Court of Admiralty; from the 1st of January 1814 to the 26th April 1816.

£.

s.

d.

Balance 1st January 1814

332,433

19

5

Amount of Receipts in the above period

892,856

17

1

£.

1,225,290

16

6

£.

s.

d.

Amount of Payments made in the above period, under royal warrants, decrees of court, &c.

948,105

0

2

Balance, 26th April 1816

277,185

16

4

£

1,225,290

16

6

ABSTRACT of the above PAYMENTS:

£.

s.

d.

1814.

Payments to Captors

449,700

11

3

Mar. 2

Paid into the Exchequer, for the Purposes of the Civil List

100,000

0

0

11.

Paid into the Exchequer, in aid of the Consolidated Fund

4,073

10

4

May 6.

Paid to the Controller and Paymaster of the Establishment of her royal highness the Princess Charlotte

7,500

0

0

Payments to Captors Agents

1,880

0

8

Payments to Captors Proctors for Costs.

417

11

8

Dec. 3.

Paid into the Exchequer for the purposes of the Civil List

100,000

0

0

Payments to Claimants, including Primage, Expenses to Masters, and other Allowances

9,055

4

8

1815.

Payments to Claimants Proctors for Costs

72

15

1

July 27.

Paid to the Controller and Paymaster of the Establishment of her royal highness the Princess Charlotte

9,000

0

0

Apr. 22.

Paid a further Sum into the Exchequer, in aid of the Consolidated Fund

3,263

4

0

Payments to the Receiver General of Droits

23,745

7

8

Payments to the Admiralty Proctor for Costs

231

19

1

Payments to the Marshal of the Admiralty for Charges

3,011

11

6

By Proceeds of American Cases, brought in by the Commissioners, but carried to the Account of Suitors for the present, the Condemnations being appealed against

8,277

12

7

By so much which the Registrar overcharged himself with in a former Account

1,543

9

4

By Repayments to the American Commissioners

96

15

6

1816.

Payments to King's Proctor for Bills of Costs

9,450

14

6

Feb. 3.

Paid to the Controller and Paymaster of the Establishment of her royal highness the Princess Charlotte

3,000

0

0

Mar. 14.

Paid to the Right Honourable John M'Mahon, to be applied by him in discharge of the Expenses incurred for Buildings and Alterations at the Pavilion at Brighton

20,000

0

0

By Registrar's Poundage, and Expenses attending issues of Monies, &c.

3,784

12

4

Apr. 20.

Paid into the Exchequer for the proposes of the Civil List

190,000

0

0

£.

948,105

0

2

Note:—There still remain various Claims of Captors for Rewards not yet determined on, also Expenses on Condemned Property undischarged, and other Contingencies; to the Liquidation of which the Balance of 277,185l. 16s. 4d. will be applicable.

Admiralty Registry, Doctors' Commons, 27 April 1816.

Signed,

J. FARQUHAR.

No. 2.—RECEIPTS and PAYMENTS by Sir Cl. Ch. de Crespigny, Receiver General of the Droits of Admiralty; from the 1st January 1814 to April 6th 1816.

1814

RECEIPTS:

£.

s.

d.

Jan. 7.

By Mr. Avery. Droit at Padstow

11

2

5

31

By Interest of Exchequer Bills X

94

4

9

Apr. 21.

By Mr. J. N Kirby, Droits at Antigua

364

5

8

29.

By Exchequer Bills X

4,074

0

9

May 27.

By Exchequer Bills X

3,603

11

2

June 13.

By G. Gostling, Esq. Droits from the Cape of Good Hope

22,000

0

0

July 26.

By G. Gostling, Esq. proceeds of the San Pedro, New Providence

1,000

0

0

Sep. 15.

By G. Gostling, Esq. Droits from the Cape of Good Hope

2,700

0

0

Oct. 3.

By Exchequer Bills sold X

4,079

14

3

8.

By Exchequer Bills sold X

7,629

3

0

27.

By Exchequer Bills sold X

1,012

16

3

Nov. 2.

By Exchequer Bills sold X

1,020

11

8

19.

By Mr. George Moore, Droit from Malta

346

2

9

Dec. 14.

By G. Gostling, Esq. proceeds of Union and Alligator, Calcutta

2,000

0

0

22.

By G. Gostling, Esq. proceeds of San Pedro, N. Providence

450

0

0

By G. Gostling, Esq. proceeds of Trimmer, N. Providence

600

0

0

1815.

Jan. 18.

By G. Gostling, Esq. proceeds of the Hellingren, Barbadoes

397

12

2

Feb. 25.

By Exchequer Bills sold X

1,514

3

6

Mar. 14.

By Exchequer Bills sold X

2,069

16

3

Apr. 5.

By Mr. Waters, Droit at Carmarthen

44

3

4

30.

By Mr. J. Bright, Droit at Exeter

3

0

0

May 18.

By Mr. J. Ward, Droit at Cowes

50

6

0

June 9.

By G. Gostling, Esq. the Pamplona, Droit at Barbadoes

687

3

5

23.

By Regr. of H. Ct. of Admiralty, proceeds of dria Kroungren de Vewagting, Endragt

3,633

0

6

By Regr. of H. Ct. of Admiralty, proceeds of Lydia

657

15

4

July 3.

By Mr. Wright, Droit at Exeter

2

10

0

28.

By Interest on Exchequer Bills X

252

19

6

Aug. 9.

By Exchequer Bill sold X

1,005

11

3

Sep. 7.

By Interest on Exchequer Bill X

11

0

6

By Sale of Exchequer Bills X

2,007

5

9

18.

By Sale of Exchequer Bills X

5,053

0

1

19.

By Sale of Exchequer Bills X

1,836

7

8

21.

By G. Gostling, Esq. part proceeds of Ship Adolphus. condemned at Nassau

1,748

6

6

30.

By G. Gostling, salvage of Mary, of Bengal

400

0

0

By G. Gostling, the Decateur, condemned at Barbadoes

151

11

2

Oct. 13.

By Regr. of H. Ct. of Admiralty

19,454

11

10

Nov. 29.

By Exchequer Bills sold X

4,109

2

8

Dec. 18.

By Exchequer Bills sold X

9,347

10

6

1816.

Jan. 22.

By Richard Birt, Esq. sum overpaid in proceeds of the Copenhagen and Nymph

376

8

8

Feb. 12.

By Mr. Ward, Droit at Isle of Wight

6

5

4

26.

By Exchequer Bill sold X

1,038

17

6

Mar. 14.

By Exchequer Bill sold X

524

1

11

Apr. 3.

By Mr. John Dougan, proceeds of schooner Rose, Droit at Bermuda

1,285

9

6

108,653

13

6

Deduct the Sums in this Account marked X which are mere Accounts of Exchequer Bills, in which the Balance of this Account is from time to time invested, Viz.

£. 94

0

9

4,074

0

9

3,603

11

2

4,079

14

3

7,629

3

0

1,012

16

3

1,020

11

8

1,514

3

6

2,069

16

3

252

19

6

1,005

11

3

11

0

6

2,007

5

9

5,053

0

1

1,836

7

8

4,109

2

8

9,347

10

6

1,038

17

6

524

1

11

50,283

18

11

Total Receipts of Droits £.

58,369

14

7

1814.

PAYMENTS.

£.

s.

d.

Mar. 2.

To James Choyce, one of the captors of the San Pedro; in obedience to H. R. H. Prince Regent's warrant

24

1

0

To Mr. St. Bacbe, agent to the master, officers, and crew of the ship Alexander; in obedience to his Majesty's warrants, dated June 18, 1810, and 3d. December 1813

908

12

0

To Chas. Bicknell, Esq. half year's salary, to 1st March

100

0

0

To self and Clerk half year's salary,

175

0

0

14.

To Captain, Officers, and Crew of H. M. S. Spitfire; in obedience to P. Regent's warrant 7th March

304

1

9

May 11.

To Garrison of Trinité, one-half of proceeds of La Stephanie; in obedience to P. Regent's warrant of 20th October 1813.

2,485

5

1

27.

To Commissioners for settling Fees of V. A. Courts; in obedience to P. Regent's warrant, dated 13th May

1,377

16

0

June 2.

To G. Gostling, Esq. proceeds of Calmar; in obedience to monition of H. Ct. of Admiralty.

3,991

15

0

6.

To Sir James Bontein; in obedience to P. Regent's warrant of 4th May

1,351

16

0

15.

To Exchequer Bills bought *

18,074

18

5

16.

To Owners, Officers, and Crew of brig Bee, proceeds of Resource; in obedience to P. Regent's warrant of 7th May

652

15

9

To Govr. Patton and Garrison of St. Helena, part of the proceeds of the Batavia; by order H. Ct. of Admiralty

618

5

11

July 14.

To Owners, Officers, and Crew of ship United Kingdom, part of the proceeds of the Batavia; by order H. Ct. of Admiralty

228

5

3

To Owners, &c. of ship Baring, part of the proceeds of the Batavia; by order of H. Ct. of Admiralty

263

14

4

To Owners, &c. of ship Minerva, part of the proceeds of the Batavia; by order of H. Ct. of Admiralty

126

6

4

Aug. 31.

To Exchequer Bill bought *

1,021

8

0

Sep. 15.

To Treasurer of the Navy: in obedience to his Majesty's warrant, dated 6th August

1,016

1

0

30.

To Exchequer Bills bought *

1,311

18

11

Oct. 8.

To H. R. H. the Duke of York; in obedience to his Majesty's warrant, dated 30th September

4,000

0

0

12.

To Messrs. M'Iver and Twemlowe; in obedience to his Majesty's warrant, dated 23d September.

7,878

4

6

22

To H. R. H. The Duke of Clarence; in obedience to his Majesty's warrant, dated 15th October

1,762

5

7

Nov. 1.

To G. Gostling, Esq. sundry Bills

133

5

6

To Chas. Bicknell, Esq. half year's salary, to 1st September

100

0

0

To self and Clerk Esq. half year's salary,

175

0

0

Dec. 13.

To H. R. H. The Duke of Clarence; King's warrant, dated 18th November

125

6

3

21.

To Exchequer Bills bought *

2,003

11

6

1815.

Jan. 17.

To G. Gostling, Esq.; by order of Admiralty

608

15

3

Feb. 24.

To Captain John Davie; King's Warrant, dated 11th Feb.

1,390

2

0

To the Rev. W. V. Fryer King's Warrant, dated 21st Feb.

743

0

6

To Mr. Robert Taylor King's Warrant, dated 11th Feb.

129

8

3

28.

To G. Gostling, Esq. sundry Bills

51

10

3

March.

To Chas. Bicknell, Esq. half year's salary to 1st inst.

100

0

0

To self and Clerk Esq. half year's salary to 1st inst.

175

0

0

9.

To James Jackson, his Share in the San Pedro

24

1

0

13.

To Samuel Hancock, Esq. Expenses incurred under direction of the Treasurer of the Navy - his Majesty's warrant, dated 6 August 1814

1,302

3

1

To Samuel Hancock, Esq. Expenses incurred under direction of the Treasurer of the Navy - his Majesty's warrant, dated 7th October 1814

753

15

10

May 9.

To Wm. Speer, Esq. Expenses incurred in the case of the Ship Elizabeth and Mary, his Majesty's warrant, Dated 14th April

706

3

6

11.

To J. Riley, his Share in the San Pedro

24

1

0

June 23.

To Regr. of H. Ct. of Admiralty - Poundage

33

0

10

To Regr. of H Ct. of Admiralty - Poundage

7

14

10

To G. Gostling, Esq. his Bill

3

15

8

To Regr. of H. Ct. of Admiralty, by order of the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty.

166

11

4

27

To G. Gostling, Esq. his Bill

1

6

8

To Exchequer Bills bought *

3,517

4

4

Aug. 1.

To Exchequer Bills bought *

1,014

8

3

10.

To Admiral Lukin, by order of H. R. H. the Prince Regent's warrant, dated the 5th instant

1,055

14

6

Sept. 5.

To Mr. F. G. Donovan, by order of H. R. H. the Prince Regent's warrant, Dated 5th August

209

14

6

7.

To Mr. G. Elwall, proceeds of Ship S. Carolina and cargo, by order of H. R. H. the Prince Regent's warrant, dated 29th August

1,915

11

6

16.

To Mr. R. C. Sconce, by order of the Lords Commrs. of the Admiralty

34

18

0

21.

To Ali Bahi, by order of H. R. H. the Prince Regent's warrant, dated 14th instant

8,127

4

6

To Sidi Mahomet Hardan, by order of H. R. H. the Prince Regent's warrant, dated 14th instant

729

4

6

30.

To G. Gostling, Esq. sundry Bills

36

13

3

Oct. 13.

To Regr. of Admiralty - Fees, Poundage. &c.

177

17

10

To G. Gostling, Esq. sundry Bills

1,234

1

3

To G. Gostling, Esq. sundry Bills

28

19

4

17.

To Sir Jas. Bontein - order of H. R. H. the Prince Regent's warrant, dated 14th May 1814

244

0

0

19.

To Exchequer Bills *

14,441

7

3

Nov. 10.

To Mr. Austin - Poundage, Greenwich Hospital and Chest

1,584

6

2

14.

To Mr. Woodbine Parish, for examining Accounts of the Regr. of Admiralty - King's Warrant, dated 9th Nov.

626

3

6

To Charles Bicknell, half year's Salary to 1st September

100

0

0

To self and Clerk, half year's Salary to 1st September

175

0

0

To Error in last Accounts, proceeds of Lydia, debited at 657l. 15s. 4d. received only 646l. 14s. 10d.

11

0

6

23.

To G. Gostling, Esq. by order of the Lords Commrs. of the Admiralty

519

17

6

To A. Newman and others, proceeds of Venus and Cargo, in obedience to H. R. H. the Prince Regent's Warrant, dated 8th November

3,402

19

8

Dec. 1.

To Mr. W. Cole, further proceeds of Ship S. Carolina, in obedience to H. R. H. the Prince Regent's Warrant, dated 20th November

457

4

6

20. 1816.

To Rd. Birt, Esq. proceeds of Copenhagen and Nymph, in obedience to H. R. H. the Prince Regent's Warrant, dated 20th November

8,416

5

0

Jan. 17.

To Jas. Sedgwick for examining Accounts of Regr. of Admiralty, in obedience to H. R. H. the Prince Regent's Warrant, dated 12th January

606

3

6

Feb. 5.

To Mr. Slade - proceeds of Paulina, in obedience to to H. R. H. the Prince Regent's Warrant, dated 30th December

585

19

6

15.

To Sir James Bontein, by order of the Lords Commrs. of the Admiralty

256

10

0

29.

To J. C. Esten, Esq. for business done in American Treaty cases, in obedience to H. R. H. the Prince Regent's Warrant, dated 23d of February

227

4

6

March 4.

To Chas. Bicknell, Esq. half year's Salary to 1st March

100

0

0

To self and Clerk, Esq. half year's Salary to 1st March

175

0

0

April 6.

To Chas. Bicknell, Esq. two Bills

57

7

6

To Messrs. Adam & Ross, Assigns to John Birch, Esq. Compensation for loss of Swedish Ship Regina Christina - his Majesty's Warrant, dated 3d April 1816

1,843

17

3

£.

108,342

2

2

DEDUCT the Sums in this Account marked * which are mere Accounts of Exchequer Bills, in which the Balance of this Account is from time to time invested, viz.

18,074

18

5

1,021

8

0

1,311

18

11

2,003

11

6

3,517

4

4

1,014

8

3

14,441

7

3

41,384

16

8

TOTAL Payments on Account of Droits

£.66,957

5

6

Lincoln's-Inn Fields, 9th April 1816. Errors Excepted, Signed CL. CH. DE CRESPIGNY.

No. 3.—Statement of RECEIPTS and PAYMENTS by the Commissioners for Danish Droits of the Crown, between the 1st of January 1814, and the 25th April 1816.

RECEIVED:

£.

s.

d.

For the Sale of Danish Stores taken at Heligoland

671

15

1

PAID:

To the Registrar of the Court of Admiralty

671

15

1

Into the Exchequer, in aid of His Majesty's Civil List Revenue

2,339

15

0

£.

3,011

10

1

Danish Commissioners' Office,

Signed

25th April 1816.

A. HAYTON, Sec.

The above-mentioned Sum of 671l.15s. 1d. is included in the Account of the Registrar of the Court of Admiralty, Appendix No. 1.

No. 4.—Statement of RECEIPTS and PAYMENTS by the Commissioners for American Droits of the Crown, between the 1st January 1814, and the 25th April 1816.

RECEIVED:

£.

s.

d.

For the Sales of ships and cargoes

160,465

0

5

PAID:

To the Registrar of the Court of Admiralty, for proceeds of ships and cargoes

561,765

0

3

To the Registrar on Account of Interest arising from the Funds in the hands of the Commissioners

18,000

0

0

To George Elwell, for the proceeds of the cargo of the America, Hillert, restored

5,202

1

2

To Samuel Williams, for the proceeds of the Neptune and cargo, restored

5,143

12

1

To Samuel Williams, for the proceeds of the cargo of the Champlin, restored

3,914

19

9

To Samuel Williams, for the proceeds of the cargo of the Danae, restored

3,352

11

7

To Bell and Co. for the proceeds of the Diana and cargo, restored

1,568

17

8

To James Newman, for the proceeds of the Hiram and cargo, restored

412

8

4

To George Cowie, for the proceeds of the Mary and cargo, restored

1,243

12

3

To D. H. and I. A. Rucker, for the proceeds of the Indiana and cargo, restored

2,739

12

6

£.

603,342

15

7

American Commissioners' Office,

Signed

25th April 1816.

A. HAYTON, Sec.

The above-mentioned Sums of 561,765l. 0s. 3d. and 18,000l, are included in the Account of the Registrar of the Court of Admiralty, Appendix No 1. and should therefore be deducted from this Account.

Copy of the TREASURY MINUTE, dated 5th April 1816; requesting lord Binning, Mr. Ryder, and Mr. Sturges Bourne, to examine into the offices of government.

The earl of Liverpool, and chancellor of the exchequer, recommend to the board, That, with a view of enabling his majesty's government to form an opinion in regard to the reductions which may be practicable in the several offices and civil departments of the kingdom, which have been created since the commencement of the war in the year 1793; that a commission or committee should be appointed to inquire into the nature, extent, and course of the business of the said offices and departments, and that they should report to this board upon those offices, and particularly, whether they consider any of them as no longer necessary, or whether the duties now performed by them could, without inconvenience to the public service, be transferred to any other offices or departments, or what reductions may be made in the establishment of such offices or departments, without prejudice to the business they are expected to perform; and they recommend to the board, that lord Binning, Mr. Ryder, and Mr. Sturges Bourne, should be nominated as members of the commission or committee, to undertake this investigation.

My lords entirely concur with the earl of Liverpool, and the chancellor of the exchequer, upon this important subject, and are pleased to direct letters to be written to each of those gentlemen, requesting they will undertake this inquiry; and acquainting them, that if they will communicate to this board, from time to time, the names of the departments or offices from whom they may be desirous of receiving information, my lords will give directions that every facility may be afforded to their investigation. (Signed)

C. ARBUTHNOT.

Silver Currency

in presenting a petition from several traders and retail dealers, inhabiting the parishes of Shoreditch, Spital-fields and its neighbourhood, praying for a new coinage of silver, took occasion to express his disapprobation of the present silver currency, and to recommend, that the new silver currency should be fabricated not agreeably to the existing law, but agreeably to the plan proposed by lord Liverpool in 1805. By the existing law, a pound weight of silver was to be coined into 62 shillings, which weighed a pound; consequently, whenever the price of silver rose, a temptation was held out to melt the coinage. Thus government and individuals were both to suffer. He should therefore propose, that a new arrangement should be adopted, analogous to that which prevailed in all the other nations in Europe, and that in addition to some reduction of the comparative weight of the metal, a small seigniorage should be allowed. Thus government and individuals would be protected from suffering on any enhancement of the price of silver. The hon. gentleman concluded with vindicating the executive officers of the mint, from the slur which an hon. friend of his, not then in his place (Mr. Baring), thought proper to cast upon their skill. He had recently seen some specimens of a new coin from the mint which certainly did great credit to the persons who superintended that department; and he would take that opportunity of stating, that, in his opinion, those persons discharged the duties of their office with great honour to themselves and advantage to the country.

said, he did not rise to oppose the bringing up of the petition. There undoubtedly was great force in what had fallen from the hon. gentleman, and the petitioners had certainly just cause of complaint. It was true, as the hon. gentleman had stated, that this subject had engaged the attention of his majesty's ministers. The subject was now under consideration; but the House must be aware that it was attended with considerable difficulties, and that it ought to be maturely weighed before any measure was adopted. He was obliged to the hon. gentleman for having adverted to what fell from an hon. friend of his a few nights ago, who had thought proper to make a most uncalled for and unjust attack upon the officers employed in the mint. He had represented them as incapable of conducting the business of the mint, and had alluded to some transaction in which they had been employed by the bank, and said, that on that occasion they had proved to be incapable of coining the common bank tokens. It certainly was a matter of equal surprise and regret to him to hear such an attack made upon gentlemen, who, he knew, in point of integrity and science, were equal to any men employed in a similar manufacture, in the world. Upon inquiry, he found that the transaction alluded to by the hon. gentleman, occurred when the new machinery was introduced into the mint, and the fact was, that the moneyers were not at first as expert in working that machinery as the person by whom it was invented, which occasioned some delay; a circumstance which was not at all surprising. But he should like to ask any of the bank directors, whether they had now, or for the last two or three years, had any cause of complaint? In point of fact, the last coinage of three shilling pieces was superior, with respect to execution, to any coinage that had been issued during his majesty's reign. The hon. gentleman, after making these general attacks upon the officers employed in the mint, at last came to a point, and said that when they were called upon a short time ago to coin some Louis d'ors, they had not done themselves much credit. Now he would state the fact to the House. The officers of the mint were employed at the period alluded to to make Louis d'ors, with the approbation of the French king, of the same weight and fineness as those made in France. When this coinage underwent the trial of the Pix, the French ambassador was invited to attend, accompanied by such scientific persons as he thought proper, and to bring with him some Louis d'ors coined at Paris. The coin underwent a regular trial at Gold-smith's hall, and the jury of goldsmiths reported that they could discover no difference between the Louis d'ors coined in England, and those coined in France, either in weight or fineness. But this was not all: the assayer of the Paris mint wrote to the assayer of the mint in England, expressing his astonishment at the accuracy with which they were made. He held now in hand eight Louis d'ors, four coined in France and four coined in England; he would, if gentlemen pleased, hand them across the table; and he would defy any gentleman, unless he knew the private mark of the French mint, to distinguish one from the other. He felt it his duty to say thus much in justification of some very meritorious public officers, who had been attacked most unjustly, and who had felt that attack most severely. He had only to repeat, that the subject adverted to in the petition was under the consideration of government, and he trusted that the result would be the adoption of some satisfactory measure as soon as possible.

differed from the suggestion of allowing a small seigniorage upon the new silver currency, as well as the other suggestions of his hon. friend, as quite ineffective, and observed upon the difference which had taken place in the relative value of gold and silver, the latter of which was depreciated. He recommended that the value of our silver currency should be regulated by weight rather than by tale, which was the custom at present. He also advised that silver should be made a legal tender, while gold should be left to find its own value, and this he thought the best time likely to occur for making such an arrangement.

wished to know how it happened that Louis d'ors were coined at the British mint—that we should counterfeit foreign coin.

said, that the French coin had been struck at our mint, by the express authority of the French ambassador, and at the desire of the French king.

said, that the private mark of France was not put upon the Louis d'ors coined here, but that a mark and symbol of our own had been impressed upon them.

said, that no doubt the right hon. baronet was aware of the object in coining these Louis d'ors; that it was for the convenience of transmitting, for the pay of our army when they first entered France, a coin which would pass current in that country. It had been done by the express authority of the king of France.

The petition was then read, setting forth,

" That the petitioners have for a considerable time past experienced, and do now suffer, great inconvenience and embarrassment, from the imperfect state of the silver currency, and particularly from that part of it consisting of what are denominated shillings and sixpences, which constitute no inconsiderable proportion of the coin which the petitioners are obliged to receive in payment for the articles of their daily trade; that, during many years past, very few of the shillings and sixpences in currency have appeared to be of the legal coin of the realm, but, on the contrary, have borne evident marks of being counterfeits, but which, nevertheless, from the want of any thing better, have passed current; that of late there has been an immense influx of French silver coin, bearing the stamp of the French mint, which have been introduced into circulation, and passed for shillings and sixpences; and although these French coins are visibly of more intrinsic value than the counterfeits before described, the petitioners have reason to believe that their intrinsic value is from thirty to forty per cent. below the current value at which they have been circulated in this country, and that the current value of these pieces in France, at the present rate of exchange, is more than twenty per cent. below the value at which they are now circulated in England; that the temptation arising from the profit upon the importation of this coin is so great, that the quantity now in circulation is become a public and increasing grievance; and that, unless an effectual remedy to this increasing evil is speedily applied, the petitioners are convinced that the consequences will be most injurious to mechanics and to tradesmen residing in manufacturing districts, where change for payment of wages causes a greater influx of small currency than in other parts of the country; that the peti- tioners are informed that a considerable fall has lately taken place in the price of silver; and for this reason, and under the other circumstances above stated, they humbly pray the House to take the subject into its consideration, with a view of securing to the petitioners, and to the public in general, the advantages of a good currency in silver, consisting of sixpences, shillings, half-crowns, and crown pieces, or any other coin considered proper by the House."

The petition was ordered to lie on the table.

Bank Restriction Bill

The House resolved itself into a committee on the Bill for further continuing an act of the 44th year of his present majesty, to continue the restrictions contained in the several acts of his present majesty on payments of cash by the bank of England. The first clause having been read, for continuing the restriction until the 5th of July, 1818,

professed himself unwilling to make any opposition to the measure of allowing two years to the bank for preparing to return to cash payments, as such a prolongation of the term seemed to meet with the general sense of the House. It seemed to be as generally the sense of both sides of the House, that it was desirable such a protection to the bank should not be extended beyond this limited period. There was no clause, however, in the bill, as it now stood, expressive of this decided expectation of parliament and the country; but he hoped it would not pass the committee without receiving such a necessary amendment. It could not receive his support unless it came out of the committee in a different state from the other restriction acts that had formerly passed. He would oppose it in all its subsequent stages, and would take the sense of the House upon it, unless the chancellor of the exchequer introduced a clause, declaring, that while parliament extended the restriction for two years longer, it was done with the understanding that this renewal of it should be the last, and that the bank should be prepared to meet its termination with a provision of cash sufficient to answer all the demands that their promissory notes authorized the public to make upon them. Taking it for granted that this was the general feeling of the House, and that the bill would not be attempted to be carried through without an incorpo- ration of a clause expressive of the pleasure and direction of the legislature that the bank should prepare for the event of its expiring at the time specified, he was ready to concur in its provisions. With this understanding, he had no objection to the term of two years; but if it was attempted to pass it, like an ordinary act of this kind, without such a clause, he would take the sense of the House whether its duration should be so long. Hoping for a satisfactory answer, he would abstain, at present, from farther observations: if disappointed in his reasonable expectation, he would oppose the bill in all its steps.

agreed with the hon. and learned gentleman as to the policy and desirableness of renewing cash payments at the end of two years. He only wished to allow the bank facilities of doing that which they were anxious to accomplish, and which all so much desired. Two years would be sufficient time for allowing all necessary preparations to be made. The bill allotted this term, and in the preamble expressed how desirable it was that cash payments should be resumed. He was not aware that it was necessary to add any clauses to the act of 1797. Though several had been proposed, he thought none of them eligible. The restriction only protected the bank for two years, and the act of 1797 allowed them to pay their notes in specie, upon giving notice to the Speaker for publication in the Gazette. If the restriction was limited in its existence to one year, the bank, as it was the repository of bullion and coin for the rest of the kingdom, and supplied the country banks with circulating medium, might not have time to prepare for all the demands. He again repeated, that the publication in the gazette would be sufficient, and that the bank understood that the term could not be prolonged.

was sorry to see that the right hon. gentleman intended to introduce no clause expressive of the expectation of parliament that cash payments should be resumed at the end of the two years, and its determination that no other renewal of the restriction act should take place. It was with great dissatisfaction that he observed this. What had been stated of the act of 1797, with regard to publication in the gazette, did not answer the purpose. He wished no specific direction to be given to the bank, but to leave them to enjoy parliamentary confidence with regard to the means of accomplishing the objects which they as well as parliament professed to have in view, with only a parliamentary assurance that no renewal of restriction could be hoped for. The clause with regard to the notice to the Speaker, and to the subsequent publication, allowed the bank to renew payments upon such notice. Without the publication they were prohibited from paying their notes. After such publication they could not stop, but must answer all demands, however inconvenient they might find it. After 1797 they gave such notice, and in consequence of it there were demands made upon them to a great amount, and much gold was issued, which was melted down by the jews. The proposal to pay notes of a certain amount only could be no protection, because all notes might be exchanged into this admitted class, and presented for payment. The bank, therefore, would never give notice till they were able to answer all demands created by all kinds of promissory notes. Parliament should, therefore, make a general enactment, that no renewal of the restriction act could be expected after two years, and leave all the rest to the bank. If the House inserted this in their act, it could not be neglected. He wished no injunction, as he was certain the opinion of parliament would be attended to. He (Mr. H.) had drawn up a clause which, in the enacting part, contained nothing more than that, on the 5th of July 1818, the bank should be prepared to resume cash payments, and that it was expected they should do so as long before that period as they could, consistently with the exercise of the necessary caution and prudence that the situation of the country imposed. He, therefore, would move a clause to this purport, that after the 5th of July, 1818, the bank should be able to pay in specie, and that no renewal of the restriction could be expected.

thought the object of the hon. and learned gentleman's clause might be attained without its insertion. He had given notice, on a former evening, of his intention to introduce certain words into the preamble of the bill, declaratory of the intention of parliament, which he would now read to the House. He apprehended they would be found better than the clause of the hon. and learned member, which, in point of fact, enacted nothing more than what the law had already declared. After the usual words of the preamble, " that it was highly desirable the bank of England should, as soon as possible, return to its payments in cash," he proposed to add, " but it is expedient also that a further continuance in the present restrictions be granted, in order to afford time to the bank for resuming such payments in cash without public inconvenience." He did not think it would be possible to have a more distinct declaration of the sense of parliament.

said, he collected from the observations of the right hon. gentleman that he wished the House to trust in his opinions, rather than in a parliamentary declaration. He (Mr. G.) was more disposed to confide in the latter than in the former; for last year, when the same subject was before parliament, the right hon. gentleman confidently affirmed that he thought the bank might resume its cash payments next July, and now, when the price of bullion was much lower, and the foreign exchanges in our favour every where, he called upon parliament to protract the restrictions two years longer. He should, therefore, prefer a parliamentary declaration to any opinion which the right hon. gentleman might offer.

thought that the addition proposed by the chancellor of the exchequer to the preamble of the bill, was not so authoritative as a clause introduced into its enactments, and that it was totally inefficient for the end in view. It was necessary to return speedily to cash payments. It should be recollected that peace had placed us in a different situation with regard to our foreign trade than that in which we stood during the war. In war we enjoyed a monopoly, and however high the price we demanded, we could obtain it, because we had no competitors. Now the case was altered. Other nations were claiming their share of the general advantages resulting from trade and industry, and they could enter the career without our burthens. They could afford to fabricate almost every article in which we dealt, cheaper than we. They could undersell us in the markets to which we resorted. They could manufacture cheaper than we—they could navigate their vessels for less. Out of 186 ships that passed the Havannah with cargoes for South America, not one was British. If we looked at the property connected with our commerce and shipping, we should see a lamentable and ominous depreciation. The shares in the fund of the London-docks that sold for 120l. or 130l. now sold for 70l. or 75l. The issue of paper had turned the foreign exchanges against us. This circulation had been diminished, and produced distress. He rejoiced at this diminution of the currrency, although it had been productive of temporary inconvenience; because, otherwise, we might be universally undersold in foreign markets. Our ships would be without employment—our manufacturers without work—our capital unproductive. Nothing could prevent this but the precaution of returning to cash payments.

thought the opinions of the hon. gentleman who had just sat down on commercial subjects erroneous. He accounted for the difference in the value of the London-dock fund from the diminution of the warehousing system, and not from the reduced state of our trade. He repeated his statement, that the opinion of parliament would be sufficiently declared in the preamble, by the introduction of the words he had read.

supported the opinions of Mr. Horner, and contended, that there was no difference between the present act and that which was passed in the preceding session. It was notorious that the bank, in consequence of the former, had not taken steps for the resumption of cash payments; and could the House hope for a different result to the present measure, unless they expressed their resolution decidedly in favour of that great object?

said, that the bill, as it stood at present, did not, in his opinion, sufficiently express the intentions of parliament. By merely introducing the words proposed by the right hon. gentleman, it would look like nothing more than one of the ordinary renewals of the restrictions. If, therefore, there were no other reason for departing from the customary mode, he would do it, to show that the House meant something different from what they had formerly done. He wished to convey to the bank and to the public an idea that they were now in earnest. He would suggest the adoption of some such words as the following—" Whereas it is expedient to provide that the said act should be further continued, and a time fixed in which the said restrictions shall cease." These words would definitely determine the meaning of parliament, and then it might be further added—" that the said act shall continue in force till the 5th July 1818, and no longer."

considered the debate of the former evening as having been productive of much good, as it had elucidated the grounds on which the bill was to pass the House. The principle which ministers acted on was not from any political views, but simply for preparing the bank to meet the demand which would necessarily be made on them. He thought it reasonable to grant them sufficient time for preparation, and was glad to see the House agreed on this general ground. The preamble had been objected to in consequence of its being virtually the same with last year's preamble, and it had been said the directors were just as sincere then in their desires to meet the public demands for cash payments as they were now. But he did not agree in the opinion of their having made no preparation for such payments, as they knew well the intentions of parliament, and consequently must have prepared. He wished some words to be introduced into the preamble, to obviate every doubt which might arise on the subject, and suggested these words be added—" To afford time to them to make such preparations without public inconvenience, for meeting the public demands, as to their experience and wisdom should seem proper, at the earliest opportunity." Some such words would meet the wishes of all.

observed, that the preamble was generally the last thing considered, but here it was the first. He said he would not be satisfied unless the committee came to some specific decision on the subject; and he thought the clause he had proposed might be so modified as to meet every objection. He was not very sure of the words " no longer." Experience had shown that they were much to be distrusted, as containing one meaning in one session and a different meaning in another [Hear! and a laugh].

said, the directors of the bank had not so inactive a part as had been represented. They were as anxious to do every thing they could for the benefit of the public, and had been for some time past making preparations for the resumption of cash payments.

observed, that the statement just made by the hon. director, was a sufficient inducement to the House to repose on their prudence and honour, and to give them sufficient time for preparation.

hoped, that the bank would, in their future preparations, be more successful than they had hitherto been.

said, that while the preamble of every bill expressed the desirableness of cash payments, these had never taken place. The present moment was certainly unfavourable for continuing the restrictions. A great fall in price had recently taken place, which was now succeeded by a rise, and the continuance of these restrictions would afford a strong encouragement to country bankers to issue paper. Unless the prices fell considerably beyond what they had been, trade must be curtailed. The House of Commons should speak boldly to the bank; for by merely passing the act in the same mode as last year, we were encouraging them to go on in their present career. The House should tell the bank directors it was their duty to resume cash payments, as an act of justice to the public, though attended with loss to themselves. He deprecated the present system as affording facilities to the chancellor of the exchequer in borrowing, which he could not and ought not to have.

approved of the insertion of the words " no longer," in the preamble. He believed the bank directors, as individuals, were very sincere in their wishes to accommodate the public, but as a commercial body they were bound to look to themselves, and mind their profits. By the continuance of this act they gained 800,000l annually, making the whole of their profits from the public to amount to 1,500,000l. per annum.

said, that, as far as the question before the House affected the bank, he saw no particular objection to the insertion of the words " no longer;" but, as a member of that House, he could not assent to it, when so many political circumstances might occur to render it impolitic. He said, that it was unfair to speak of the high price of bank stock, when it was notorious that its price was lower than that of the Royal Exchange.

replied, that the difference between the bank and the Royal Exchange was this: the former obtained their profits by taking advantage of a necessitous public; while the latter were a fair trading company, whose profits were the result of their industry. They had no connexion with the government, except by paying a large sum every quarter as the price of stamps.

said, the House was now labouring under a difficulty how to express its earnestness in this cause, in the best manner. He supported the insertion of the words " no longer," as experience pointed out the propriety of their being so inserted. The bank were long ago bound to take precautions for meeting the public demand, and he certainly thought them as much bound last year as they could be in this year.

The committee divided:

For the amendment

57

Against it

133

Majority

76

List of the Minority.

Atkins, John.

Marryat, Jos.

Astell, Wm.

Macdonald, James.

Abercrombie, hon. J.

Mackintosh, sir J.

Althorpe, lord.

Markham, admiral.

Bankes, H.

Martin, H.

Babington, Thos.

Martin, John.

Barham, Jos. F.

Milton, viscount.

Bernard, lord.

Morland, S. B.

Brougham, H.

Newport, sir J.

Browne, D.

Newman. Wm,

Calvert. Nic.

Ossulston, lord.

Cochrane, lord.

Parnell, sir H.

Douglas, hon. F. S.

Powlett, hon. W.

Duncannon, visc.

Rancliffe, lord.

Fergusson, sir R. C.

Ridley, sir M. W.

Folkestone, lord.

Romilly, sir S.

Finlay, K.

Sefton, earl of.

Fynes, H.

Smith Wm.

Gaskell, B.

Smyth, J. H.

Gordon, R.

Talbot, R. W.

Grant, J. P.

Tavistock, marquis.

Hamilton, lord A.

Tierney, rt. hon. G.

Hornby, E.

Waldegrave, hon. captain.

Horner, Francis.

Jervoise, G. P.

Warre, J. A.

Knox, Thomas.

Wilder, general.

Leader, Wm.

Wright J. Atkins.

Lamb, hon. Wm.

Wynn, C. W.

Lloyd, J. M.

TELLERS.

Lyttelton, hon. W

Grenfell, Pascoe.

Latouche, Robert.

then, moved an enacting clause, providing " that the directors of the bank should, without delay, take such measures of precaution as would enable them to resume cash payments as early after the passing of the act as in their judgment should appear practicable and safe."

resisted the motion, contending, that the object would be subtantially attained by a paragraph in the preamble.

observed, that if the object on both sides was the same, it was of little consequence how it was attained; he thought the clause much to be preferred to the mere notice in the preamble; and if the former appeared to convey any censure, it might be altered to suit the delicate feelings of the bank directors. It was a point upon which many gentlemen were in the dark, whether the present bill was the measure of the chancellor of the exchequer for the public benefit, or of the directors for their own: he was bound to presume the former, and to believe that the directors, according to their own statement, were gentlemen only living for the purpose of resuming cash payments, and willing to inundate the country with gold in a week, if the chancellor of the exchequer would but allow them. Why, then, did they resist the clause of his hon. and learned friend which was framed to second their own wishes. Without it, the bill would be nugatory. However demure the bank directors might look, and whatever professions they might make, they seemed resolved to act in opposition to those looks and professions; they had still upon their countenances all the beautiful simplicity and innocence they had worn for the last nineteen years—always pretending to be ready to pay in gold, yet, when the time came, always finding some reason to keep their money in their own hands. He entertained great personal respect for the directors individually; but, speaking of them collectively, he could not help saying that they seemed very desirous of retaining in their hands the annual gain of 800,000l. Under these circumstances, what course was left but to hold over them a clause like that proposed.

explained, repeating that the preamble was the fit place for the mention of preparation.

observed upon the inconsistency of the directors, who professed to be ready to obey the orders of parliament, yet resisted most firmly all kinds of instruction. What he had heard obliged him to revert to his original opinion, that nothing would be done by the bank unless they were forced to it by the enacting language of the bill.

The Committee divided:

For Mr. Horner's clause

54

Against it

144

Majority

90

contended, that the decision of this question did not affect the interests of the bank of England. The directors were willing to concur in any act the wisdom of the House should deem necessary.

moved an addition to the preamble of the bill, stating, that the period of two years was allowed in order to afford time to the bank to make preparations for resuming cash payments.

begged to ask, since the directors of the bank had voted against his clause, whether the words added to the preamble would be considered by them as a direction from parliament to prepare. [Hear, hear and cries of Baring, Manning.]

conceiving himself called upon, rose and observed, that no man had a right to expect an interpretation of particular words: he denied that the directors were influenced by any considerations of profit.

was sorry that the hon. gentleman from a mistake, had given himself the trouble of repeating what he (Mr. H.) had no particular curiosity to hear. He called upon either of the hon gentlemen near him (Messrs. Manning and Baring) to answer this plain question—whether they did or did not consider the words added to the preamble as a direction from parliament to prepare to resume cash payments as early as possible?

After a considerable pause, no answer being given,

asked, if the silence of the hon. directors was not perfectly intelligible? [Hear, hear!].

The motion was then agreed to; and the House having resumed, the report was ordered to be received on Monday.