asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland, If the Local Government Board, Ireland, received any report from the medical or other officers of the Kilmainham Hospital, Dublin, respecting the recent outbreak of typhoid fever in that institution; and, if not, will he, as President of the Board, cause an inquiry to be instituted, and a report to be made, as to the number of cases of typhoid fever that occurred in the hospital this year, the class of residences in which they occurred, the opinion of the medical officer, Dr. Carte, and of the medical gentlemen who were consulted as to the immediate cause of the outbreak, and place such report upon the Table of this House for the information of the sanitary authorities of the kingdom; and if, having regard to the fact that hygiene is not made a necessary part of the education of medical officers licensed for the Civil Service, the Local Government Board intends to adopt any means of en- suring that all medical officers hereafter to be appointed medical officers of dispensaries, and as such, sanitary officers of their dispensary districts, shall produce satisfactory evidence of their knowledge of hygiene as a requisite qualification for such appointment?

Sir, I have communicated by telegraph with Dublin, and find that the Local Government Board have no official relations with Kilmainham Hospital or with Dr. Carte, the medical officer, the hospital being under the War Department in Ireland. I understand, however, that the water supply of that establishment was not very good, and that there has been an outbreak of typhoid fever there. I am further given to understand that in consequence of this outbreak, provision was made to obtain a supply from the Vartry River. I believe that the works necessary are at present proceeding. There is no special hygienic qualification required for medical dispensary officers in Ireland, but all such officers are either "physicians and surgeons" or "surgeons and apothecaries," and must have been educated and examined in subjects which relate to what is called "hygiene," and as the legislation of the present Session has imposed important sanitary duties on these officers, this branch of medical knowledge will doubtless receive from them more careful attention than they may have hitherto bestowed upon it.

asked the President of the Local Government Board, If any Correspondence has taken place between that Department and the War Office in reference to the nuisances arising from certain factories in the neighbourhood of Woolwich and Plumstead; and, if so, if he would have any objection to lay Copies of such Correspondence upon the Table of the House; and, if the attention of the Local Government Board is being directed to the subject?

, in reply, said, there had been some Correspondence between the War Office and the Local Government Board upon the subject of these nuisances, but as the Correspondence was not yet completed it was not usual to have Copies of it laid upon the Table. The matter was still receiving the attention of the Local Government Board. He had received a letter only two or three days ago to the effect that the factories which had been the subject of the most grievous complaints were now taking steps to remedy the evil, and he trusted in a short time some progress in that direction would be made.

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland, Whether he can give any assurance that the Irish Government will revise the Rules and Regulations for the Government of Lunatic Asylums in Ireland, under the Act 8 and 9 Vic. c. 107, s. 9, with a view "to alter or revoke" the rule in relation to tenders that has given offence to some Governors of Lunatic Asylums in that country?

, in reply, said, that the Rules and Regulations of the Irish Lunatic Asylums had recently been most carefully revised by a Committee of the Irish Privy Council, specially appointed for the purpose. An objection had been made by the Governors of the Limerick Lunatic Asylum to one of the Rules relating to tenders, and on inquiry it was found that the view of the Governors of other Lunatic Asylums in Ireland was not the same as that of the Governors of the Limerick Lunatic Asylum. He was informed that some of the Governors of the latter had resigned and others were likely to follow their example; and, therefore, he would consider whether it was in any way possible to alter the Rule in accordance with their wishes. It was evident, however, that there must be one uniform Rule for the whole of Ireland.

asked the Under Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, Whether, looking to the great anxiety that exists in the country on the subject of the Brussels Conference, it will be possible to issue during the Recess any Papers bearing upon the proceedings of that Conference?

, in reply, said, that great interest was felt by the people of this country in the proceedings of the Brussels Congress, but he did not think that any anxiety was felt. He held in his hand the second part of the Correspondence, relating to the Rules that were proposed to govern military warfare, which he intended to lay on the Table. Should any other Correspondence take place during the Recess which the Secretary of State might think it desirable to publish it would be made public through the columns of The London Gazette.

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland, Whether his attention has been called to the trials of the Kilrea riots at the Londonderry Assizes, and to the observations of the learned judge (Barry), who said—

"In one part of your remarks I agree with you, Mr. May—that this collateral issue has been fully developed, yet I am hound to say that Mr. Rea has opened up for my consideration one of the most startling events in my professional career—namely, that a number of men, armed with bludgeons, were allowed, by magistrates and police, to go here and there through the town, and commit two audacious acts of violence, while they were well known to the police;"

and who in charging the Jury observed—

"It is the wildest nonsense to think for a moment that an attack was not premeditated, or that the party armed with sticks and bludgeons would not have attempted to stop the processionists had the police not been there. So much for that; and now we come to 'another branch of the case which I wish to dispose of at once. I may say that this, the most unpleasant part of the case, consists in the fact that only four persons of the bludgeon party are for trial, although we have the fact proved that a body of bludgeon men, armed with weapons, prepared with sticks, not accidentally—that this organised party, well described as organised ruffians, committed under the eyes of two magistrates present, and in the presence of a large party of police, two distinct acts of riot, and we have it in evidence that a list of the names of the parties was taken down by an active and intelligent policeman at the time. That policeman is enabled to name not five, or six, or seven, or eight, but a whole string of names—I do not know how many—of these ruffians who were rioting in the town that day, and it is a lamentable thing that more of these men have not been sent for trial."

Were 74 Catholics, the party attacked, made amenable to law, and only 11 of the Orange party; and who were the magistrates referred to; and would the Executive institute an inquiry into their conduct?

, in reply, said, that as the hon. Gentleman's Question had been laid on the Table only that morning, he had been unable to obtain the necessary information to answer it fully. The observations which were attributed to Mr. Justice Barry on the occasion which was referred to were quoted from a newspaper, and must be received with considerable doubt, and he had no official Report. He was afraid that both parties in these unfortunate riots were equally to blame. They had been dealt with with perfect impartiality, and a great many of the offenders had been committed for trial, Mr. May, the Law Adviser of the Castle, having been sent especially to conduct the case. The Attorney General for Ireland, he might add, would shortly have an opportunity of communicating with Mr. May on the subject.

asked the Secretary of State for War, If he would explain to the House why, if the use of Plumstead Common for Artillery exercise is defended on grounds of prescriptive use, the War Office has, since the date of the determination of the suits against the lords of the manor, taken a lease of the manorial rights from the Lords?

, in reply, said, it appeared from the Question put to him by the hon. Baronet that there was some dispute with regard to the title, but he disclaimed having rested the rights of the War Office on the grounds stated by the hon. Baronet. In the Answer he had already given, he said the War Office had used the Common since 1745, and continued still to do so. In view of further proceedings being taken, he must decline to make any further statement on the subject of title.

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland, What reasons, if any, exist for subjecting the stores of corn merchants in Ireland to the visits and inspection at all hours of the Officers of Excise; whether any such regulations are in force in England; and, if not, why Irish merchants should be subjected to regulations which do not exist in England; and, whether under the circumstances instructions will be given to have the necessary steps taken to remove this anomaly?

Sir, it is not stores, but mills and kilns, which are under Excise inspection in Ireland, the object being to prevent the malting or preparation of corn for illicit distillation. The power of inspection and the reason for it is contained in the Act 1 & 2 Will. IV., c. 55. Similar regulations are not in force in England, as it does not appear that the practice of illicit malting ever prevailed in that part of the United Kingdom. The duty of inspecting mills and kilns in Ireland is both troublesome and expensive to the revenue, and will be gladly given up whenever it shall appear practicable without encouraging the demoralizing practice of illicit distillation, which, happily, for the country, is rapidly decreasing.

, in whose name a Notice stood on the Paper that he would move for a Copy of Correspondence between the Irish Executive, the Lord Chancellor of Ireland, and The O'Donoghue, M.P., with reference to his removal from the Magistracy of Ireland and the Kerry Militia in 1862, and his re-appointment to the Magistracy in 1873, not being in the House when his name was called by the Speaker,

said, that as personal reference was made to him in this Notice, he asked permission of the House to make an explanation on the subject. The proposed Motion contained a serious charge, if not directly, at least inferentially, that ought not to have been put forward by an hon. Member who absented himself. It was stated in the Notice that he was removed from his commission in the Kerry Militia. There was, however, no foundation for such a statement. He resigned the commission which he held in the Kerry Militia because, the regiment being quartered in England, he found it inconvenient at the end of a Session not to be able to return to Ireland for a few months. The Notice also insinuated, with reference to his restoration to the commission of the peace, that he had carried on some correspondence with the Executive in Ireland and the Lord Chancellor. He begged, however, to state that he never carried on a correspondence directly or indirectly with the Irish Executive, the Lord Chancellor, or any other official, with respect, to his restoration to the commission of the peace.

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland, Whether his attention had been drawn to this case tried before Mr. Justice Fitzgerald at the late Assizes for Down, and to the fact that four persons had been excluded from the jury because they were Roman Catholics?

I have received a telegram from the Crown Solicitor of the County Down (Mr. Murland), which is as follows:—

"I did not exclude any person from the jury because of his religion. I directed four jurors to stand aside, two of whom were from the locality where the occurrence took place and the remaining two were publicans. The accused was acquitted."

then proceeded, pursuant to Notice, to call attention to the exclusion by the Crown of Catholics from the Jury in the case of Mr. Arthur Donnelly at the late Assizes for the county of Down; and to move—

"That, in the opinion of this House, the ordering to 'stand by' of Catholic jurors by the Crown Solicitor, more especially in the North of Ireland, and in eases of a party character, is a course of proceeding not calculated to enhance confidence in the impartial administration of the Law, and demands the serious attention of the Irish Executive."

He wished to point out that more than one person who lived nearer the locality than the Roman Catholics who had been set aside had been allowed to sit on the jury. He would not press his Motion to a Division; but he hoped the Attorney General for Ireland would state to the House that a full inquiry would be made into all the circumstances of the case.

called attention to the trials of the Kilrea riot cases at the Londonderry Assizes, and to the observations of Mr. Justice Barry thereon; and moved—

"That this House is of opinion that an investigation into the conduct of the Magistrates referred to by the learned Judge is necessary in the interests of impartial justice, of peace, and good order in Ireland."

seconded the Motion.

, stated that the object of the Irish Government in sending Mr. May to Londonderry, where the rioters were tried, was to ascertain the real truth in relation to this matter. That gentleman, who was selected for his well-known impartiality, had returned to Dublin; but he had not yet had an opportunity of communicating with him. Until he received full and accurate information he could not undertake to say what course the Government would pursue. Discussion on the subject was not desirable at present as further summonses on which proceedings would be necessary had been taken out in regard to the riots. The only reports yet sent in stated that justice had been vindicated in those cases which were tried.

, in rising to move—

"That an humble Address be presented to Her Majesty, praying that She will be graciously pleased to confer a clasp as well as a medal on those Officers and Men in Her Majesty's Service who took part in engagements with the Ashantees south of the River Prah, after the late War broke out, and before the arrival of the European Troops, especially at Elmina, Essaman, Abra Krampa, and Donquah, and who thereby materially caused the retreat of the enemy from the Protectorate into his own Country: and, to call attention to the decoration of the Victoria Cross,"

said, he was sorry he had been more more than once prevented from bringing this subject before the House at an earlier period of the Session. The hon. and learned Member was proceeding to advert to the Royal Warrant, which conferred the clasp usually given to officers and men under fire upon those troops only who went north of the River Prah, while the medal alone was distributed to the troops engaged south of the Prah, when—