asked the President of the Board of Trade, Whether he will, in the course of the present Session, ask Parliament for powers to regulate or prohibit trawl and beam net fishing in the territorial waters, as recommended in the recent Report of the Sea Fisheries Commissioners?

in reply, said, that the Government did not see its way, during the present Session, to initiate legislation with respect to the subject men-tioned in the Question of the noble Lord.

asked the Secretary of State for War, When it is the intention of Her Majesty's Government to lay upon the Table of the House the Report of the Commission on the Army presided over by General Lord Airey?

Sir, I have to point out to the hon. and gallant Member that the body presided over by Lord Airey was not a Royal Commission, nor a Departmental Committee, but a Committee consisting solely of military officers, with whom no civilians were associated, whose opinion on certain professional questions was sought by the Secretary of State. Their Report was only presented, in a complete form, since I took Office; and as soon as Her Majesty's Government have come to conclusions on the very important questions discussed by the Committee, ranging as they do over the whole organization of the Army, and affecting the interest of almost every class in it, I will lay on the Table the Report; or, at least, so much of it as may be given consistently with the public interest. I am bound to add that the Committee was far from unanimous, and that this divergence of opinion makes it the more necessary to guard against any premature publication. I hope to be able to state the decision of Her Majesty's Government on the main questions raised in moving the Army Estimates at the commencement of the next Session.

asked Mr. Attorney General, Whether there is any reason for the delay in publishing the list of moneys paid, into the Court of Chancery, which, according to the Chancery Funds Rules, 1874 (No. 91), should have been published last February; and, whether he will take steps to procure its early publication?

in reply, said, that he could not answer the Question, which ought to have been addressed to the Financial Secretary, who, he had no doubt, would make inquiries on the subject.

asked the Under Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, If he will state what was the position of affairs as regards the execution of the Twenty-third Article of the Treaty of Berlin when a new British Commissioner was sent out; whether the constitution of the province of Adrianople, a translation of which was promised some months ago, has yet been translated; whether constitutions for any other and what provinces have yet been drafted; and, whether in this or any other way any bona fide and effectual step has been taken towards the execution of the Article in question?

Sir, the Treaty of Berlin laid down that the Porte should depute special commissions, in which the native element should be largely represented, to settle the details of the new laws in each Province. Instead of doing this, the Porte drew up a single draft of an Organic Law for the Provinces, and sent it to be examined by local Commissions at Adrianople, Salonica, Janina, and Kossova. On receiving the Reportsfrom these local Commissions, the Porte issued a Circular to the Powers stating that the Reports were ready for examination by the Eastern Roumelian Commission, and requesting that Commissioners might be appointed without delay. This has been done; and Lord Edmond Fitzmaurice, who was selected by the Government as the Commissioner for this country, is now at Constantinople. We have heard to-day that the Porte, after making some delay, has reappointed its former Commissioners, and it may be hoped that the Commission will be formally constituted in a few days. We have heard that the Adrianople Constitution is being translated; but we have not yet received a copy of the translation.

asked the President of the Board of Trade, Whether it is intended to introduce a Bill this Session to legalize the practice of re- ceving contributions of seamen towards merchant seamen's pensions, in accordance with the recommendations of the Committee of Public Accounts in their second Report for 1879, and of the Treasury in their Letter of 27th October 1879, to the Board of Trade?

Yes, Sir. The Bill will only be a short Bill, and I hope we shall be in a position to introduce it in the course of the present Session.

asked the Under Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, Whether the communications received from the Government of Persia with reference to the obligation of the Shah under Article C of the Treaty of 1357, by which His Majesty agreed "to relinquish all claims to sovereignty over the territory and city of Herat," are under the consideration of the Government; and, if not, whether those communications can be laid upon the Table of the House without injury to the public service?

Sir, Her Majesty's Government have had under their consideration the communications which were exchanged between Her Majesty's late Advisers and the Government of Persia. Those communications did not lead to any practical result, and Her Majesty's Government are not disposed to revive them; although they would gladly see some arrangement arrived at which would place the city of Herat and the neighbouring territory under a better and more settled form of Government, as the disorders which prevail have always been a constant source of political anxiety. The communications with the Persian Government have been of a strictly confidential character; and Her Majesty's Government doubt whether any of the Papers can be presented to Parliament— at all events, at present. They will, however, consult Her Majesty's Minister in Persia on the subject.

asked the First Lord of the Treasury, If it is the intention of the Government, this Session, to introduce a Bill to amend the Law of Copyright; and, if not, if he can give an assurance that the question will be dealt with early next Session?

Sir, my hon. Friend has touched upon a subject of very great and peculiar interest to me— an interest greater, perhaps, than that attached to the question by the general public. I should be very glad indeed to see it dealt with; but I am afraid that, in view of the demands upon the attention of the House, I cannot give any specific pledge as to the time when the matter will be likely to receive the attention of the Government. The subject has been heretofore in the hands of private Members; and if any independent Member should bring forward a proposal in regard to it, it will, I feel sure, be received favourably by the Government, who would give any assistance to procure for it a fair and impartial consideration.

asked Mr. Attorney General, Whether it is the intention of Her Majesty's Government to introduce, during the present Session, any measure for the codification of the Criminal Law?

in reply, said, it was not the intention of the Government this Session to introduce a Bill on the subject referred to in the Question of the hon. Gentleman, as it would be impossible to make satisfactory progress with any such measure

asked the Secretary of State for War, If the officers on the Horse Guards' Staff are exempt from the rule limiting the tenure of a staff appointment to a period of five years; and, if not exempt from this rule, to explain why the officers at present holding the appointments of Adjutant General to the Forces, Deputy Adjutant General to the Forces, and Deputy Adjutant General of Auxiliary Forces, have been kept on the Staff of the Horse Guards since July, 1873; and, further, to state what period of time must elapse between the completion of five years' service on the staff and the re-appointment of the same officer for another period of five years on the staff of the Army?

Sir, I have to state that officers on the Staff of the Commander-in-Chief are not exempt from the rule limiting the tenure of a Staff appointment to five years, although this rule does not apply to his purely personal Staff, such as his Private Secretary and aides-de-camp. I cannot, however, find that there is any rule preventing an officer from receiving two Staff appointments in succession. As a matter of fact, only one of the three officers named by the hon. and gallant Member has been continuously employed for more than five years—namely, the Deputy Adjutant General of the Forces, who was promoted to that appointment from that of Assistant Military Secretary. The Adjutant General had been Quartermaster General, with a short interval between the two appointments; and the Deputy Adjutant General for Auxiliary Forces has only been appointed this year, having held no previous appointment at head-quarters. The question has not come and will not for some time come before me, as the only appointment at head-quarters likely to be soon vacant is that of Quartermaster General of the Forces, vacant on the 1st of July, which my Predecessor had filled up by anticipation in a way of which I entirely approve.

gave Notice that, in consequence of the unsatisfactory nature of the answer given by the right hon. Gentleman, he would take the earliest opportunity of calling attention to his reply.

asked the First Lord of the Treasury. Whether it is the intention of the Royal Commission upon Agriculture to issue a Report of the Assistant Commissioners sent to America before the general Report of the Commission; and, if so, when such Report may be expected to be in the hands of Members? The hon. Member also asked, When it may be expected that the Royal Commission upon Agriculture will complete its work; and, whether the Report may be expected to be in the hands of Members before the end of the present Session?

Sir, I need not tell my hon. Friend that I have no direct means of information with regard to the proceedings of the Commission; but I have considered it my duty to communicate with the noble Duke at the head of the Commission (the Duke of Richmond and Gordon), and he informs me that the Report from America has not yet been received by the Commission. I believe frequent engagements connected with the General Election have caused some postponement in the preparation of the Report, and I am sorry to say the indisposition of one of the Members has also caused delay. With regard to the second Question, the noble Duke informs me that the Commission is not in a position to say when it will complete its work and submit its Report to Her Majesty.

asked Mr. Attorney General, If any reasons exist why the Patent Office should not afford the same facilities as are enjoyed by American inventors and manufacturers of becoming acquainted with the progress of invention by the issue of an Illustrated Weekly Official Gazette of new patents similar to that issued by the Patent Office at Washington?

in reply, said there was not at the disposal of the Patent Office a staff sufficient to enable them to issue a Weekly Gazette of New Patents; and the law did not give the Office powers to compel patentees to furnish the special drawings requisite to enable them to issue a publication of this kind.

intimated that he would takeanearly opportunity of drawing attention to the administrations of the Patent Office and its vast accumulated funds.

asked the Under Secretary of State for the Colonies, What action has been taken on Sir Penrose Julyan's Report on the Civil Establishments of Malta, and on Mr. Keenan's Report on Education in Malta; and, whether he has any objection to laying these Papers upon the Table of the House?

Sir, there will be no objection to laying nearly the whole of both these documents upon the Table, and I will do this shortly. As regards the changes being made, it would be impossible to state them within the limits which the House assigns to the answer to a Question, as the alterations suggested and the changes made deal with innumerable details; but a little later, if it is wished, I shall, I believe, be able to give a great deal of information upon that subject by laying the Correspondence on the Table.

asked the Vice President of the Council, Whether the permission, given ten years ago, to use the Tonic Sol Fa method and notation in public Elementary Schools and Training Colleges on the same terms as the ordinary notation is withdrawn?

Sir, no change has been made in the regulations of the Education Department with respect to the recognition of the Tonic Sol Fa method of instruction in singing; but it is contemplated that in case the regulation in the Code which was laid on the Table in March last should come into force, the full grant will only be paid on those scholars who can read the ordinary notation.

asked the President of the Board of Trade, If his attention has been called to the Report of the master of the steamship "Teutonia," which appeared in the "Times" of the 8th May, stating that he had passed at sea a derelict vessel, "very low in the water, and dangerous to navigation;" if his attention has been called to a report by the master of the royal mail steamer "Medway," in the "Times" of the 20th, that he had passed a vessel of about 1,000 tons (the size of Her Majesty's ship "Atalanta")bottomup;and, if he will take into consideration the propriety of devising some means of inducing, or, if necessary, compelling the commanders of vessels falling in with such derelict ships firstly to ascertain, if possible, the names of such ships, and secondly, if possible, to sink or otherwise destroy them?

My attention has been called to the reports to which the hon. Member refers. There can be no doubt that such derelicts constitute a danger to navigation; but it would, I think, be impossible to devise regulations to insure their compulsory destruction. Any legislation for such a purpose would certainly be evaded, and would lead to the concealment of the existence of these derelicts by masters of vessels who now report them. It will, perhaps, be better to trust to the common sense and common interests of masters to sink or otherwise destroy them where it may be possible to do so.

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland, Whether it is the intention of the Government to deal with the Irish Grand Jury question early in the next Session of Parliament, and by a Bill specially directed to the reform of the Irish Grand Jury system?

Sir, my hon. Friend asked a somewhat similar Question a few days ago, and I must again say I cannot give him a definite answer. He is very anxious for the reform of the Grand Jury system, and I think it is generally agreed that it requires reform. But it is not the only Irish matter upon which reform is demanded, and it is impossible for me to give my hon. Friend a Sessional programme for next year.

asked the First Lord of the Treasury, If he will abolish the Board of Customs this year, so as to have the Customs work done by the Board of Inland Revenue and one set of officers?

Sir, I am afraid I cannot give any assurance to the hon. Gentleman beyond this—that the suggestion involved in this Question is one of which I am very sensible of the importance, and one which I am disposed to take into full and rather favourable consideration at the first fitting opportunity. However, it is a large administrative measure, invoicing many changes, and probably involving in the first instance, much cost to the public. I need scarcely say that no steps could be taken and nothing carried out until after a full and careful consideration of the whole matter, which I am not now in a position to give to it.

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department. "Whether, considering that the loss of life is very frequent from the present mode of using blasting powder in mines (as at Kiveton Park, South Yorkshire, a few days ago, where a serious loss of life took place), he will issue an order calling upon the inspectors to direct the attention of colliery proprietors and mine owners of fiery mines, where explosives are used for the purpose of carrying on the works, that they should he used only when the large body of the workmen are not in the mines; and, further, whether, in view of the fact that it must he a considerable time before action can be taken, as Mated by the Department on Tuesday last, he will direct the inspectors where they may deem it necessary to enforce, if possible, the use of explosives in the way referred to, by having recourse to arbitration, as per statute, with the owners on the subject?

in reply, said that he had received a Report from Mr. Dickinson, one of the principal Inspectors of mines, dated the 28th May, in which he said that there was no doubt that in many instances lives had been lost from the improper use of explosives in mines, and that the danger might have been minimized by the withdrawal of the ordinary workmen during the time that explosives were being used. He would see that the view stated by Mr. Dickinson as to the withdrawal of the workmen while explosives were being used in all mines where it was un-safe was acted on. It was not necessary he thought, to take any other precautions.

asked the Under Secretary of State for the Home Department, Whether the Government intend to in- troduce a Metropolis Waterworks Purchase Bill, with a view to refer the terms of purchase under the Water Purchase Bill in the last Parliament to a Select Committee; and, if not, whether the Government will take any steps to maintain the basis of valuation upon which the Water Purchase Bill was framed, or to prevent the Water Companies from augmenting the nominal value of their property by charging extra rates upon any increase in the assessment of property by the new valuation now in progress under the Act of 1869, or by their own assessment other than new houses coming under supply?

Sir, as the Question of my hon. Friend involves large pecuniary interests, which might be prejudiced by a postponed or imperfect statement of the intention of the Government, I shall ask the indulgence of the House, if what I have to say extends somewhat beyond the ordinary limits of an answer at this Table. It may, possibly, be deemed convenient that I should take this opportunity of stating with precision the course which the Government intend to pursue with reference to the measure called the Metropolis Water Purchase. It is within the knowledge of the House that a Bill was introduced into the last Parliament to give effect to certain agreements which had been negotiated with the Water Companies with a view to their purchase. That Bill came to an end at the Dissolution, if not before. Most hon. Gentlemen present are probably acquainted with the circumstances which have cast grave doubts on these agreements, in regard to their prudence and the advantages to be derived by the public in carrying them into effect. It seems to Her Majesty's Government quite impossible to take any steps to give validity to these agreements without a public and searching inquiry into the real character of these documents, and their actual relation to the value of the property to be acquired under them. The Corporation of London and the Metropolitan Board of Works, the two most important representative bodies of the Metropolis, have addressed to me Memorials, desiring such an investigation, and have undertaken to render the requisite assistance in conducting it. In my opinion, that is a most wise and reasonable request. Nothing short of such an investigation will satisfy the public mind us to the true character of these agreements, and of the property with which they deal. The Government will, therefore, ask the House to appoint a Select Committee to carry out this inquiry. The exact terms of the Order of Reference is a matter of some difficulty. It is obviously not expedient to give the inquiry too large a scope, so as to hang up this urgent question indefinitely. The inquiry into the agreements can be brought into a moderate compass, so as to be disposed of in the present Session. An investigation of the whole question of water supply would, evidently, extend to far wider limits; at the same time, it would not be possible or desirable to exclude from the mind of a Committee appointed to consider the proposed terms of purchase the consideration of the question whether the purchase of the undertakings of the existing Water Companies is, in itself, the only or the best possible alternative, and whether it might not be more desirable to obtain from other sources a better supply at a cheaper rate. There is another question which the Corporation in its Memorial points to as a fitting subject of inquiry—namely, the basis of the charge for water—that is to say, the basis on which the powers of the Companies are founded, and which enable them to raise their water rents without limit in proportion to the growth of value in houses, without themselves expending any further monies or rendering any additional services. That likewise seems a matter deserving of inquiry and redress. In conclusion, I wish only to say one word as to the attitude of the Government towards this question. As respects the agreements, they accept no responsibility in regard to them. As they are to form the subject of a public inquiry it is not desirable that I should even express at this moment the opinion I entertain of them. The Government will lay them impartially before the Committee, neither as attacking nor as supporting the agreements, but prepared to deal with them as may seem best, after their true value has been ascertained. I presume they will be explained to the Committee by the gentleman who negotiated them, and who will not be the witness of the Government. They will be criticized, tested, and sifted by the repre- sentatives of the Corporation and the Board of Works. What course the Water Companies may think fit to take with regard to them I cannot at this moment say as I have received no communication from them. But, of course, every facility they may desire will be placed at their disposal in order to state their case as they may think; but by this means the Committee will be enabled to form a sound judgment on the matter of the agreements. With reference to the whole question of the water supply of the Metropolis, I would observe to the House that it is not primâ facie an Imperial question which belongs strictly to the province of the Executive Government. It is, and ought to be, if the proper machinery were available, a question of local metropolitan administration. On this, as on many other subjects, we have to deplore the want of a central metropolitan authority for the general government of London. That is a great and urgent question, and I hope that this Parliament will not close without making an earnest attempt at its solution. But, in the meanwhile, it is the duty, as it is the wish of the Government to assist the inhabitants of London in supplying the defects of their local organization. I have thought that the best available means in the present instance was to invito the co-operation of the Corporation and the Metropolitan Board to aid the Government in a solution of the difficult matter we have to deal with. I am happy to say that that appeal has been cordially responded to. Both these great bodies, representing the inhabitants of London, have expressed their willingness to co-operate with the Government and with one another before the Committee. This seems to me a good augury for the future; and it is in such a combination that I see the best hopes for dealing hereafter in an adequate manner with a matter which so deeply concerns the health and wealth of this great Metropolis.

My right hon. and learned Friend has not answered the latter part of the Question. The House is probably aware that the option of purchase under the Bill of the right hon. Gentleman the Member for South-West Lancashire (Sir R. Assheton Cross) lapses on the 1st of July; and my object in putting this Question was to get an answer from my right hon. and learned Friend as to whether the Government would, by negotiation or otherwise, endeavour to obviate the action of the Water Companies which they may take under their statutes—that is, of raising their rates to a considerable amount.

I rise simply to say that I did not quite catch whose statement it was that the right hon. and learned Gentleman read to the House.

The right hon. and learned Gentleman, in his very discursive answer, has replied to a Question which I had placed upon the Paper. I would only ask him when it is likely that the Select Committee will be appointed?

I shall give Notice of the Committee to-day or to-morrow.

said: Sir, I am sorry to interpose for a moment between the House and Public Business; but I really think I have some right to claim from my right hon. and learned Friend an answer to the Question which I put to him. I gave public Notice of the Question, and I think it was a reasonable one, and one of some little importance. At any rate, I hear that one of the Water Companies has already given notice of an intention to raise its rates. I would ask my right hon. and learned Friend to have the courtesy to say, at all events, whether he declines to answer, and, if so, why?

Sir, I should be exceedingly sorry to think I had been wanting in courtesy to my hon. Friend. I thought I had answered the Question of the hon. Member at great length. I will, if the hon. Gentleman desires it, read it again. The answer I gave to the Question to which the hon. Member refers is this:—

"There is another question which the Corporation in its Memorial points to as a fit subject of inquiry—namely, the basis of the charge for water—that is to say, the basis upon which the powers of the Companies are founded, and which enables them to raise their water rents without limit in proportion to the growth of value in houses, without themselves expending any further monies or rendering any additional services. That likewise seems a matter deserving inquiry and redress."

asked the Under Secretary of State for the Colonies, Whether Cetywayo, the late King of the Zulus, is still confined as a State prisoner in the Cape Colony; and, if that be so, how long Government intend to confine him, and what course they intend to pursue towards him?

Sir, Cetywayo was by the latest telegraphic accounts—those of May 19—still in the charge of the military authorities at Cape Town, in the building described in the despatch of the l5th of September, 1879, which will be found at page 267 of the Correspondence presented to Parliament in February last. The Government are expecting a full Report with regard to him in answer to a telegram which was sent on the l5th of this month by the Secretary of State, in which he directed that Cetywayo should be allowed all the liberty which could be given to him conveniently, and that he should be allowed to see his friends. There is a Bill at the present time before the Cape Parliament for the purpose of authorizing his being detained by the civil, and not as he now is by the military authorities, at the Cape; and it is hoped that the result of that Bill may be very materially to improve his position. When the discussion on that Bill is finished there will be a further Report on the subject. I may add that the Secretary of State is anxious that Cetywayo should have all possible liberty and consideration compatible with his detention within the limits of the Cape Colony.

asked the Under Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, If his attention has been called to British claims of long standing against Brazil, which the late Government frequently stated to be on the eve of satisfactory settlement; and, if he can give any assurance that, the present Government will insist on all these pending matters being brought to an issue?

Sir, some delay has arisen in consequence of the Brazilian Government desiring to revise their list of counter claims, and also by reason of the recent change of Government in Brazil. But Her Majesty's Government hope that negotiations will shortly be resumed on the subject.

asked the Civil Lord of the Admiralty, Whether the Admiralty is now prepared to grant the Greenwich Hospital age pension of 5d. per diem to all qualified Naval pensioners on their attaining the age of 55 years; and, if not, upon what principle the selection is to be made from amongst those qualified persons who have attained that age?

in reply, said, the number of Greenwich age pensions was limited to 7,500 by Order in Council of the 29th of June, 1878, and that number would not suffice to give the age pension to every pensioner on attaining the age of 55. In awarding these pensions, the seaman's health, his ability to contribute to his own support, and the number of persons dependent upon him were taken into account. By the same Order in Council it was enacted that seamen in receipt of a naval pension of half-a-crown a day should not have the age pension in addition.

asked the Secretary of State for India, Whether he can state the probable date at which certain Returns as to the salaries of Indian officials, Covenanted and Un-covenanted, European and Native, will be laid upon the Table of the House, these Returns having been ordered by the late House of Commons on the Motion of the Eight honourable gentleman now Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster?

Sir, the orders of the House of Commons were forwarded to India on the 17th of July last, with a despatch inquiring what expenditure of money was likely to be involved in a compliance with them, and within what period the Returns could be made. On the 22nd of January, 1880, the portion of the Return prepared in the India Office was sent to India with a request that certain columns might be filled up, as the information was not to be obtained here, and the Paper returned as soon as possible; and Lord Cranbrook again requested to be informed when it was likely that the Indian portion of the Returns would be transmitted. No reply has been received to either despatch; but there can be no doubt that the Returns will involve much time and labour in all the Provinces of India. A further despatch will be sent asking when the information may be expected.

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland, If his attention has been called to the twelfth paragraph of the Order issued by the Local Government Board on the 29th April 1880 commanding relieving officers to post copies of a list of destitute persons relieved cut of the workhouse, with their names, the number of dependent persons of the family, and the residence, "in such public places as the board of guardians shall direct;" if any such order as this has been enforced of late years in Ireland; and, if, having regard to the poverty at present affecting Ireland, and to the danger that persons in temporary want of out-door relief may be deterred from seeking it by the exposure of their names, and of the misery of their families in public places, the Local Government Board will direct the paragraph in question to be modified?

Sir, in the year 1852 an Order was issued by the Local Government Board in Ireland commanding relieving officers to post copies of a list of destitute persons relieved out of the workhouse, with their names, the number of dependent persons of the family, and the residence, "in such public places as the board of guardians shall direct." Owing to the numbers relieved out of the workhouses having been for several years very small, the practice of posting lists of persons relieved fell into abeyance; but in the month of March last it was deemed necessary to remind the Boards of Guardians of the Order. It was thought that the ratepayers ought to know how, and for whom, their money is expended; and though it is the bounden duty of the relieving officer to see that real destitution is relieved, it must not be forgotten that it is necessary to take step3 to prevent imposition.

asked Mr. Attorney General for Ireland, Whether, after the expiration of the Peace Preservation (Ireland) Act on June 1st persons now having claims for compensation for personal injuries can proceed with those claims at the forthcoming or any subsequent Assizes; and, whether the expiry of the Act will in any degree interfere with the existing powers of Grand Juries in cases where the aggrieved persons have served all the requisite notices and otherwise complied with the provisions of the Act?

Sir, with the expiration of the Peace Preservation (Ireland) Act on the 1st of June the powers thereby conferred on Grand Juries to make presentments of money by way of compensation for personal injuries will cease; and, therefore, no applications for such presentments can be made at the next or any subsequent Assizes. This will be the case whether the preliminary notices required by the Act to entitle persons to apply for such presentments have or have not been served before the 1st of June.

asked the First Commissioner of Works, Whether he can arrange that the National Gallery be thrown open to the public every weekday throughout the year?

Sir, since the Question put to me on Thursday last by the hon. Member for Middlesex (Mr. Coope), I have been in further communication with the Trustees of the National Gallery, through Mr. Burton, the Director. They are now considering the question how to accommodate the public as far as possible without unduly interfering with the usefulness of the Gallery as a place for art education. In these circumstances, I should be much obliged if my hon. Friend would repeat his Question at some future time, when I shall be prepared to state the decision at which the Trustees have arrived. I may add that, as First Commissioner of Works, I have no power to alter or amend regulations regarding the National Gallery; and, further, I may state that the Trustees wish it to be known that they have no special desire to close the Gallery in October if the staff at their disposal were sufficient to enable them to keep it open, and this matter will receive the careful consideration of the Government.

asked the Secretary of State for India, with reference to Return No. 37 of the last Session of the last Parliament, entitled "East India (Ecclesiastical Department)," If it is true that the large sum of £200,000 per annum, drawn from funds supplied by the general taxation of India, is not spent in providing chaplains for the Civil and Military servants of the Queen only, but also for "persons altogether unconnected with Government;" if, notwithstanding the resolution of the Indian Government to reduce the expenditure on Church establishments, chaplains are still being appointed to stations where there are few or no officials; and, whether, before next Session of Parliament, ho will undertake to look into the subject with a view of remedying the complaint that Her Majesty's subjects in India, who are not Christians, are taxed to provide clergymen for European and Eurasian residents in that country?

Sir, in reply to the Question of my right hon. Friend, I have to state that the total annual expenditure in the Ecclesiastical Department of India appears to amount, at the Government rate of exchange, to £ 180,131. In their despatch given on pages 3 and 4 of the Return, the Government of India state that the expenditure in this Department has since 1870 been revised and reduced, and they hope to effect further reductions during the current year of 1880–81. There are a few stations to which chaplains are allotted where, according to the Return, "few or no Europeans" attend church; but such chaplains are charged with "out-stations," requiring periodical visits, and have other duties to perform which are mentioned by the Bishop, and by the Archdeacon of Calcutta in his "General Remarks" contained on pages 54 and 55 of the Return. I am not aware that there has been any complaint of the character referred to in the last part of the Question of my right hon. Friend. Undoubtedly it is the case that at some stations persons altogether unconnected with the Government avail themselves of the ministrations of the Government chaplains. I do not think it would be possible or desirable, however, that these chaplains should be precluded from attending to the spiritual wants of other persons than those employed by Government, although, of course, they are primarily intended to minister to the spiritual wants of officers in the service of the Government. I am quite willing to make inquiry whether there are any cases where chaplains are not required for the legitimate purpose of this appointment.

I beg to ask the hon. Baronet the Member for Carlisle a Question of which I have given him private Notice. Can he name a day when he intends to bring forward his Motion with regard to Sir Bartle Frere, and what are the terms of the Motion?

If the hon. Member will be good enough to repeat his Question in a few days I hope I shall be in a position to give him a definite answer.

Will the hon. Member name the day? ["No, no."]

Sir, I beg to ask the Prime Minister a Question of which I have given him private Notice. Whether the Royal Commission on Agriculture will, in regard to their Report, have the co-operation of Mr. Goschen and of the Lord President of the Council; and, if not, whether, in view of so serious a loss, the Government will nominate other Gentlemen to serve on the Commission?

Sir, my noble Friend the Lord President of the Council (Earl Spencer) has resigned his seat on the Royal Agricultural Commission. I need not say that Mr. Goschen, on account of his employment elsewhere, has been led to take the same step, and he will be quite unable to perform the duties of a Commissioner for some time. Her Majesty's Government, under the circumstances, have thought it right to supply their places; and they have obtained the services of Lord Carlingford, and of my right hon. Friend the Member for Halifax (Mr. Stansfeld).

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland, If he has any objection to lay upon the Table of the House a statement showing the number of extra police stationed in the county of Mayo, the number of iron huts or other buildings erected for their accommodation, and the cost to the people of that county for the maintenance of this extra force?

The hon. Member placed his Question on the Table on Friday evening; and as I did not see it until Saturday, I have had no opportunity of obtaining information on the subject from Ireland. I shall endeavour to obtain that information, and if he will repeat his Question on Thursday I may be able to give it to him; or perhaps he would do better to move for it as a Return.

asked the First Lord of the Treasury, Whether it is the intention of Her Majesty's Government to create a Minister of Commerce and Agriculture, with a seat in the Cabinet, according to the Resolution of the late Parliament?

Sir, the subject contemplated in this Question is a matter which would involve a very extensive re-arrangement of the Business of the Government; and the machinery at their command is too heavily called upon at the present time to render it at all possible for them to take into their consideration any such extended and complicated change. There are, however, some subjects, not without importance, as to the re-adjustment of some weighty branches that are connected with the purpose of the hon. Gentleman's Question; and I may possibly be able in a short time to make a further communication to the House on the subject.

asked the Under Secretary of State for the Colonies, Whether any reply has been received by the Government to the telegram sent out by them on Friday as to the treatment of the Basutos?

Sir, we have received from the Cape a reply to the telegram which I mentioned on Friday, to the following effect:—

"My Ministers assure me that the latest official Reports from Basutoland are the reverse of alarming. They entirely concur in the latter part of your message."

expressed his belief that the Motion, as it stood, would not accomplish the object in view, inasmuch as a number of Notices of Motion intervened between the Orders of the Hay and the Motion of which Notice had been given by the hon. and gallant Baronet the Member for West Sussex (Sir Walter B. Bart-telot). Therefore, he proposed to amend the Motion by adding, after "Committee of Supply," the words—

"And the Notices standing before the Notice of Motion relating to the Parliamentary Oath (Mr. Bradlaugh) Committee."

said, that by one of the Standing Orders of the House it was laid down that in the case of a Select Committee concerning the Privileges of the House a Member might be appointed and nominated at once without Notice. The Notice of additional names proposed by his hon. and gallant Friend the Member for West Sussex to the Committee on the Parliamentary Oath only appeared on the Paper on Saturday; and, therefore, it was impossible to move any Amendment to the names. In these circumstances, he wished to know whether it would be competent to any hon. Member to propose to change one of the names without giving Notice?

said, he had already stated, in answer to a Question put to him on Friday, that every proceeding with reference to this Committee, after what occurred on the first occasion, could not be regarded as a question of Privilege. It seemed to him, therefore, that it was necessary to give Notice of the addition of any names to this Committee.

pointed out that the Notice of Motion just given with reference to the Order of Business was couched in the usual terms, and would produce the desired result.

contended, on the other hand, that it would be necessary to amend the Motion in the way proposed by the hon. and learned Member for Carnarvonshire.

expressed his opinion that the original Motion would accomplish the object which was aimed at.

said, that according to the instructions issued by the Treasury, where any officer in any Public Department was receiving additional remuneration beyond his salary in such Department, then his double salary was to appear in the Estimates of both Departments. In the Household of the Lord Lieutenant there were 16 officers, and only one of these appeared on the Estimates as receiving additional remuneration from some other source. He believed, however, that it was the case that more than half of these officers were in receipt of remuneration from the Public Votes under other Estimates. He wished to ask the noble Lord the Secretary to the Treasury, why the rule laid down in the Treasury Circular had been departed from in the present instance?

said, that he was not aware of any case where what the hon. Member mentioned took place; but he would make inquiries upon the subject.

said, he should like to know why the Ulster King of Arms received £500 per annum from the Irish Record Office Vote as Keeper of State Papers, in addition to his other emoluments.

said, he believed the salaries had been fixed a long time since, and could not be altered during the lifetime of the present holder of the office.

said, that as the right hon. Gentleman the Chief Secretary to the Lord Lieutenant was also, he believed, in virtue of his Office, the President of the Local Government Board in Ireland, and in that capacity was charged with the duty of administering the provisions of the Relief Act, which was passed in the last Session of the late Parliament, he thought that perhaps it would be convenient, and it certainly would serve to allay some considerable anxiety in Ireland, if they were to take that opportunity of ascertaining from the right hon. Gentleman, more fully than they had yet been able to do, what precise steps he was taking in view of a promise contained in the Queen's Speech, and also in view of the Circular he had issued. It was probable that a very large strain would be thrown upon the Department of the Local Government Board owing to the charitable relief in Ireland being likely soon to come to an end. He should also like to remind the Committee of the measures which had been taken up to the present time by Parliament in order to meet the great distress which now existed in Ireland—measures which, in his opinion, had proved themselves altogether inadequate to the work in hand. In the last Session of Parliament there were two Acts passed for this purpose; one the Seeds Act, a very useful Act—the effect of which would not be seen until after the harvest; and the other, the Relief of Distress (Ireland) Act, containing, amongst others, the following provisions:—It gave power to the Guardians in the scheduled Unions to grant out-door relief in food and fuel: but up to the present time that provision had not been taken advantage of. Secondly, Boards of Guardians who had elected to borrow sums of money necessary for relief from the Commissioners of Public Works were given authority to borrow them at 3– per cent interest. That provision of the Act had not been much used. Further power was given to the Boards of Guardians under the Act to borrow sums of money necessary to defray the cost of out-door relief allowed under the Act from the Commissioners of Public Works at 3½? per cent interest. So far as he had been able to ascertain, that power had been little used, as Boards of Guardians did not, to any marked extent, up to the present time, give any assistance in the shape of out-door relief. He now came to those portions of the Act which had been used to some extent—namely, the power which was given to the Commissioners of Public Works to advance money to the owners of land and the sanitary authorities at 1 per cent per annum, no interest being levied for the first two years, for the purpose of permanent improvements in land, and for the purpose of works which could be executed by the sanitary authorities under the various Sanitary Acts. Now, he found, on referring to a Return which was obtained on the Motion of the right hon. Gentleman the late Chancellor of the Exchequer, that £1, 184,000 had been applied for, to be distributed under these provisions among the owners of land in the scheduled Unions up to the 20th of March last. Of that amount £354,8i0 only had been sanctioned, and of the amount sanctioned, only £69,955 had been issued to the date he had mentioned. By the same Return it was shown that £141,179 had been applied for, up to the same date, by the sanitary authorities. Of that amount, only £31, 807 had been sanctioned, and the actual amount issued was only £2,569. So that of the amount authorized by the Act of last Session to be lent to the landowners for the relief of distress in Ireland, only about one-eighteenth had yet been issued, and only about one-fourth in round numbers of the loans applied for had been sanctioned. In the case of the sanitary authorities, only one-seventieth of the amount applied for had been issued; but it was true that one-fifth of the amount applied for had been sanctioned. From information that he had collected, which, he thought, would convince many people who doubted the reality of the distress in Ireland of the emergency which now existed, he was enabled to state that about £580,000 had been spent in the different distressed districts in Ireland in the shape of private charity to relieve the distress. Ho found, also, that of the amounts subscribed by the charitable, and now in the hands of the priests, Bishops, and others for the relief of distress, there remained only about £120,000 unexpended. Thus it had been found necessary, in order to keep the people from dying in thousands, to spend in four months in the shape of charity £580,000; there remaining only £120,000 more to last for the next three or four months before the harvest. Those facts supplied material for a very great deal of serious consideration. He had shown, on the one hand, what had yet been done by the Government for the purpose of meet- ing the existing state of affairs in Ireland —he had shown that, up to the present time, only about £100,000 had been issued by the Board of Works for the purpose of affording employment under the Relief Act of last Session in the distressed districts. On the other hand, it had taken £580,000 spent in charitable relief to keep the people alive during the past three or four months. Now, he wanted to know if the machinery under which the loans were issued worked so roughly and so badly as to break down, what was there, then, to prevent hundreds of people from starving during the next three or four months? He would assume that £354,000 had been sanctioned in loans, but not issued by the Board of Works up to the 20th of March, and that that money would be forthcoming very much more quickly than it had hitherto done. But what reason, then, had they to suppose that all that money would reach the people who had been kept alive hitherto, and who had been in receipt of charity since the commencement of the year? He knew, as a matter of fact, that in many of the most distressed districts, where the people had been most largely in the receipt of relief, the smallest sums had been applied for by the local landlords under the Local Act of last Session; and, consequently, the only thing these people would have to fall back upon would be the administration of out-door relief by the Poor Law Boards or the workhouse. What would happen if the people were driven to adopt one of these alternatives? The rates were paid in Unions by people who themselves were in a starving condition —namely, the small farmers and others. The Unions, in fact, were bankrupt; and if a rate were levied for the purpose of supplying out-door relief it was only levying relief for the starving upon the starving. He should be told, perhaps, that money was to be advanced at 3½ per cent to the Unions; but if the Unions were in a bankrupt condition now, what probability was there that they would not be bankrupt when they required the money, and for a long time afterwards? He did not think that a loan would be of any use in remedying that difficulty. The fact still remained that the people upon whom they had to depend to repay the loan were bankrupt and were starving and utterly unable to pay the rates. During the Famine of 1845–6–7 many in- stances were known in which the rates largely exceeded the value of the rateable property in the Unions; and if the people in the Unions were driven bank upon the rates the same thing must happen now as happened then, and the rates would amount to such an enormous sum as would be impossible to pay them. He did think that some little debt was due from England to Ireland in respect to this matter. Rich and prosperous England had contributed less to the distress in Ireland than had Australia. More money had come from Australia than from England, and five times as much had come from Canada and the United States. The exertions of Parliament had been confined up to the present to passing the Act of last Session giving power to the people to borrow their own money—not English money, but the money of the Irish farmers themselves, and in the hands of the Commissioners of the Disestablished Irish Church. That money was to be lent by the Poor Law Board to local landowners and to the sanitary authorities. But supposing this machinery, provided by Parliament for the Irish to borrow their own money, was equal to the purpose, the fact would remain that Parliament had done nothing out of Imperial resources to meet the extraordinary crisis now existing in Ireland. He was sure the right hon. Gentleman the Chief Secretary to the Lord Lieutenant would wish to do everything he could to prevent the distress. But the right hon. Gentleman must be aware of the wide extent of his responsibility, and must not forget that it had taken £580.000 to keep the people in the West of Ireland alive during the last four months, and that had it not been for the money contributed by nearly all the known world the people of Ireland would have died in thousands, He regretted very much to see the right hon. Gentleman rely too much on the inadequate provisions made in the last Parliament to meet the emergency. The present Government had been given time to consider the matter thoroughly, and to take all the measures necessary to cope successfully with the distress. But had it not been for the charitable relief the people would have already died from starvation, and they were met by the fact that no larger sum than £120,000 or £180,000 now remained in the hands of the charitable committees. In a few weeks that money would be spent, and they would then have nothing between the most extreme distress and the entirely inadequate and bad provision of the Act of last Session. He had thought it right, under those circumstances, to ask the right hon. Gentleman the Chief Secretary for Ireland whether the result of his inquiries up to the present time, during the short period that he had been in Office, as to the operation of the Act of last Session, was satisfactory? And, further, Whether he thought it would be an adequate provision to enable these distressed and bankrupt Unions to tide over the rest of the year, by simply empowering them to borrow for the purpose of giving out-door relief; or whether, on the contrary, he did not think that some other measures would be necessary?

said, he was glad that the hon. Member for Cork (Mr. Parnell) had made the remarks he had, as it was very desirable that some information should be given to the Committee on this subject He could assure the Committee that steps had been taken, and still further steps would be taken, for tarrying out the Act passed in the early part of this year to prevent destitution in Ireland, and to prevent anything like starvation between this time and next harvest. It was quite true that they could not expect that the large weekly contributions from charitable funds should continue. They had been very large, and the hon. Member was perfectly right in expressing his sense of the great generosity of their fellow-countrymen in Australia and Canada, and of their friends in the United States, in coming forward at such a crisis. The hon. Member seemed to suppose that there were very few Unions in which out-door relief was now given to any extent. So far as ho could make out—and ho had given far more attention to this subject than to anything else, as it was his duty to do in the capacity of President of the Local Government Board—he did not think that that was the case. He might say that he should expect to be informed almost daily from the Inspectors in the districts of the action of the Board of Guardians, so that he might know whether they were giving the necessary assistance in relieving the distress that must arise before the harvest, The hon. Member stated that many ratepayers in those Unions were themselves in a state of great destitution. Undoubtedly that was the case, and it was the case, unhappily, in those Unions in which there was the greatest call for out-door relief. In many of those Unions many of the ratepayers were very little removed from destitution, and in some instances he feared that the ratepayers were the very persons requiring the relief. Knowing that to be the case, he had issued instructions that the Guardians must give out-door relief where required, and the Inspectors of the Local Government Board had strict orders to direct them to do so, and if necessary, in case of their being unprovided with funds, to give them immediately a loan. The hon. Member would see of what use such a direction as that would be. He trusted that by means of that provision they would insure that the destitution of the next few months would be relieved. Another effect of that measure would, he thought, be this—that it would insure that the heavy rate which the hon. Member feared, and which he said took place in the last Famine, would be avoided. During the last Famine the Guardians had no resource but to collect very heavy rates; but the loan plan which he had prepared would avoid the necessity of their adding at once to the burdens of the ratepayers. He should like to tell the Committee the position in which he found matters, and also what steps had been taken to deal with the evil, although for the exact arrangements made ho did not consider himself responsible. If he might criticize in any way the previous arrangements made for relieving the distress, he should say that the loans to the landlords were offered on rather too advantageous terms. That, however, was a past transaction which had been agreed to by the House, and the Government must abide by it. The hon. Member was rather mistaken in supposing that no great use of these loans had been made. It would have been very surprising if they had not been largely used. A grant of money to the landlord for the improvement of his property for which he had paid nothing for two years, and then merely 1 per cent interest for a long time, was too good an offer not to have been largely made use of. So great was the demand for funds, that it would be his duty shortly to bring in a Bill to increase the advance out of the Church Surplus Fund from £750,000 to £1,500,000. The amount applied for by landlords had been £1,201,000. That was a fixed sum, because there was a certain time up to which applications for advances could be made. On the 8th of May, when he was in Dublin, the amount issued was £189,720, and he knew it had been considerably increased since that time. [Mr. PARNELL: To landlords and sanitary authorities.] No, to landlords alone. There had also been an increase in the advances to the sanitary authorities. Wishing to know what the sum actually was, he telegraphed for it yesterday, and he found it was this—the amount presented for at 100 baronial sessions had been £185,000, and the amount sanctioned up to the 15th instant, £86,000. The principle upon which these loans had been dealt with had been this—The Inspector of the Board of Works went down to report whether the works, for which presentments had been made, were of real utility, and the Inspector of the Local Government Board went down to report whether they were works which would give such employment as was really wanted. Whenever these two conditions were complied with, the loan was at once sanctioned; the object in view mainly being to furnish employment between the 1st of June and the beginning of the harvest—the period during which they might expect not only that ordinary employment would fall off, but that the funds of the charitable committees would begin to fail. In some cases—he wished to be quite candid with the Committee—the Inspectors of the Local Government Board had reported that works which the Inspectors of Public Works thought would not be of real utility would be of very considerable advantage as a means of employment. In these cases, the Government had sent the question back to the Inspectors for re-consideration. The Committee, he was sure, would agree with him that really useless works were very little, if any, better than actual grants of money. In view of what actually had been done, he was in hopes that some advantage might, after all, come out of this calamity, and that there would be a considerable increase in the produce of the country through drainage and the various other improvements made. He need hardly say that while attending to these works they did not relax their attention for one moment from the condition of the really destitute. Those who were the most destitute were persons who had no able-bodied member of their family who could work. For these unfortunate people he was intensely anxious that they should do what was necessary, and that was also the feeling of the officers of the Local Government Board. It was only due to the permanent officers of the Local Government Board in Ireland, amongst whom he might especially mention the Under Secretary, Mr. Burke, and Mr. Robinson the Vice President of the Local Government Board, to say that they were as anxious in the matter as he was. It was from them the suggestion came that during the next three or four months out-door relief should be accompanied by a loan. No doubt, hon. Members heard of cases of distress, in which it was supposed the Local Government Board had not been doing their duty. Well, he had examined all such Reports carefully, and he must say that hitherto he had not found one case substantiated. It was a miserable accompaniment of a great distress like this that there should be cases of imposition. Great discrimination, he had no doubt, was exercised by the officers of the Duchess of Marlborough's Fund, which would long be remembered by the Irish people as one that was carefully and wisely and charitably administered, and also of the Mansion House Belief Fund; but he believed the relieving officers of the Board of Guardians were better able to detect imposition than inexperienced men; that, at all events, had been his experience in England. At the same time, they had to guard against the tendency to callousness in the hearts of relieving officers which familiarity with distress was apt to produce. They must take care that real cases of suffering were not passed over. That such care would be taken he was very much encouraged to hope by the tone of the Reports of the Inspectors of the suffering districts. They seemed to him to be the Reports of men who thoroughly felt the responsibility which rested upon them. Perhaps the Committee would allow him to say, in conclusion, that although he anticipated a pressure of distress between the present time and the beginning of harvest, he was very hopeful as to the more distant future. There seemed to be the prospect of a good crop of potatoes, and altogether a better season than they had had for many years past.

credited the right hon. Gentleman, as he was sure every hon. Member in that House who was acquainted with his character would do, with the best intentions and with the greatest anxiety to effectually cope with the distress in Ireland. He had no fault to find with the statement which had just been made, though he was doubtful even now whether the measures taken were adequate; but with respect to the Bill of last Session which had been referred to in somewhat deprecatory terms, he desired as one who had a hand in amending it to say a word or two. With respect to the statement of the right hon. Gentleman that loans were granted upon too favourable terms to landlords, he begged to remind the Committee that by an Amendment of his in that Bill loans were given not for the benefit of the landlord, but for the benefit of the tenants. That Amendment was to the effect that the tenant should, if he was able to fulfil the necessary conditions as to annual payments, obtain the advantage of the loan himself; and the landlord, therefore, was in no respect a gainer, except, perhaps, in the sense that under certain circumstances his rent was more secure. He thought it right that no misapprehension should exist in this matter. As to the Government measures of last year not being adequate, he had said at the time that they were not so, and had endeavoured to amend the Relief of Distress (Ireland) Bill.

I did not say that the Act was inadequate. I said that loans for public works or drainage would not meet all the destitution.

said, the right hon. Gentleman misapprehended him. He was not referring to anything the right hon. Gentleman had said, but to the words of his hon. Friend behind him (Mr. Parnell). He had found fault with the Bill, and he found fault with the Act now. The mode of repaying presentment loans appeared to him to be unfair. The money had to be repaid in 15 instalments, twice a-year. It had, therefore, to be all repaid in seven years, whereas the landlords and tenants who had recieved the £750,000 were allowed 35 years to pay. That defect, among others, they had endeavoured to remedy in the Bill, but in vain; and he trusted that the present Government would not enforce the repayment of the presentment loans too severely. He was rather surprised to learn that out of the £750,000 only £189,000 had been actually sanctioned or paid.

Pardon me! £189,000, in response to applications for £1,200,000. The reason is that the money is paid only as it is required. The hon. Member would not wish it to be idle before being used.

said, the point of his observation was this—only a small proportion of the total fund had yet been lent, and of that money even they did not know the application. Moreover, he understood there were great delays between the applications for loans and the granting of them. Now, they were just entering upon a period of what would probably be acute distress, and it would be important to know how much of the £1,500,000 available from the Church Surplus Fund had been spent up to the present moment; also where and how it had been spent, to be assured that no needless delay in its application would be made. What ho should like to know was the condition of the West of Ireland. Were reproductive works going on there, and, if not, how was it proposed to meet the distress? It would be impossible to meet it by out-door relief, for rates would have to be imposed which the ratepayers would be unable to pay; some of the Unions and electoral divisions of Ireland, in fact, would be made bankrupt. Equally unfortunate results would ensue if recourse was had to any such means of repayment as the labour rate of 1847, which in 14 months amounted to 23s. in the pound. It was, therefore, very important to know where reproductive works existed, and on what terms money was advanced. Unless loans were made at a low percentage, and unless precautions were taken to prevent the pauperization of whole districts, the condition of some of the Western Counties of Ireland in two or three months time would be miserable indeed. He had nothing further to add on the subject of loans, except to impress upon the Government the neces- sity of proportioning those loans as far as possible to the distress, of making them at a low rate, and of doing away with delay as much as possible. There was every prospect of a good crop of potatoes, he was happy to say; but he trusted there was no intention of making the ratepayers pay back the loans of seed potatoes. For whose benefit were those loans intended? They were intended for the cottier tenants, the holders of an acre or less; and if the crops of these poor people were confiscated to pay the loans this year they would be ruined. If, again, the Guardians had to pay, they would require to levy a rate which would fall oppressively upon the small tenants, who formed nearly half of the 050,000 tenants in Ireland. What, then, was to be done? He apprehended that the Government must, for a time, hold its hand in respect to these repayments, and not insist upon the Guardians paying, unless they could plainly see their way to doing so. He knew the Government was anxious to do its duty, and he appealed to them to exercise in this matter the generosity which the unusual circumstances of the case demanded.

said, he would confine himself to inquiring how far the Poor Law had been effective in relieving the distress; and in connection with the point he could corroborate what had been said by the hon. Member for Cork Mr. Parnell), that out-door relief had, practically, not been given at all. In two Unions he had recently visited ho found that not a shilling of out-door relief had been given, although the rates were only 1s. 4d. and 1s. 1d. in the pound. Boards of Guardians, in fact, had such an objection to giving outdoor relief, that they had thrown the whole burden of meeting the exceptional distress upon the two charitable committees, and those committees were perfectly well aware of the fact. Now, if the right of every man to labour or relief had been asserted, as it was in Lancashire in 1864, Poor Law Guardians and the owners of land would have had the greatest inducement to employ the people and diminish the rates—an inducement which could not exist when the system prevailed of allowing private charity to cope with the distress and of considering the action of the Poor Law as merely supplementary. The Boards of Guardians were bodies acquainted with the wants of their localities, and they would know what work should be done; but by putting the matter in the hands of the baronial sessions, the most useful works were thrown out. The reason for that was that the members of the baronial sessions came, perhaps, from distant localities, and knowing that there was no distress in their own districts they would refuse to deal with it where it did exist. As he had said before, he thought that very great evil arose from the want of assimilation between the Poor Laws of England and Ireland. If the Poor Law in Ireland worked as it did in England, he could safely affirm that the distress in Ireland would have been met at once. Two years ago there were signs in the West of Ireland, in Mayo and in Donegal, that very great distress was imminent. The employment in England and Scotland, which annually took some thousands of people away from Ireland, was slack. Most of those people held an acre or more of land, and being excluded from the operation of the Poor Law in Ireland their distress was not taken into account by the Poor Law authorities. Of course, there was no blame to be attached to the Poor Law authorities, for they had no right to take their distress into account. By that means, the signs that a period of great distress was coming on were discredited. No person could read the Circular of the Poor Law Board of last October without being of opinion that adequate means to meet the distress were not made. Had the Poor Law in Ireland been assimilated to that of England, there would have been no difficulty in meeting this distress two years ago. Ho would suggest to the Government that a Continuance Act should be passed, and also that an inquiry should be made as to how far the present Poor Law in Ireland should be assimilated to that of England.

said, that as he had the honour to be chairman of the Union in his part of the country, he could state that the attendance of the elected Guardians was very much more frequent than that of the ex-officio Guardians. He did not wish to make any reflections upon the ex-officio Guardians, for as the other Guardians were more numerous it was only likely that their attendance would be greater. It had also been said that the landlords were very glad to take the money offered them upon very advantageous terms, and that that course was preferred to the administration of out-door relief. He wished to state that the elected Guardians had it in their power to give out-door relief to any extent they liked, duly considering the burdens upon the people they represented. An hon. Member had stated, what undoubtedly might be the case, that where the distress was great the small tenants would be prevented from taking out-door relief. But it should not be thought that there was no mercy to poor people, and that the Guardians were not willing to do their duty by giving out-door relief wherever they could in aid of charity. Boards of Guardians naturally had to consider very carefully the circumstances of each case which came before them. He believed that in their part of the United Kingdom, more than in any other, they were liable to be imposed upon by persons seeking relief. One person found that his neighbour was getting relief, and he did not see why he should not do the same. There was a kind of jealousy of one another which was not found to exist in England. Hon. Members who represented Irish constituencies ought not to wash their dirty linen in the British House of Commons. They were free and independent, and he believed a really conscientious people; but, at the same time, he thought that a great deal more than was necessary had been made of the poverty of the country. At least, he was happy to say that such was the case in that part of Ireland from which he came. Of course, he had not such an extensive knowledge of the South and South-West of Ireland as some hon Members had who had spoken on that question. Still he had some experience of Donegal, having lived in it. In that county there was distress, and he thought there would always be distress, because of the number of small tenants and the nature of the climate. He thought the distress that year had been very much exaggerated, and he could not believe that the distress even in Donegal had been so great as had been represented in many places. He was borne out in that opinion by the testimony of many persons who had lived there. So far as the part of Ireland in which he lived was concerned, he could say that that the Guardians were perfectly willing to give out-door relief where they believed that it was required; but they would not go wholesale into the system, but wished to go carefully. In his opinion, no class of persons were more willing than the tenant-farmers, in the districts with which he was acquainted, to give out-door relief. He desired, further, to defend the ex officio Guardians from any wish to make the starving population dependent upon private charity for their support.

said, there was some inconvenience in the discussion of this subject upon the particular Vote now before the Committee; but as it was absolutely necessary that at some time or other the discussion should take place, he hoped the Committee would allow him to make a few observations with respect to it. He rose to express his great regret that the right hon. Gentleman the Chief Secretary for Ireland had announced his intention to increase the amount of the loans made to landlords. As he understood, about £i,250,000 had already been applied for by the landlords for carrying out works upon their own property at a uniform rate of 1 per cent interest. He believed that the Government now proposed to grant another £250,000 in similar loans.

said, that the Government had no discretion in the matter, and were pledged to grant the loans to landowners already sanctioned; but he might add that a considerable portion of the loans were to be made to sanitary authorities.

said, that that was what he understood. He regretted that more money was to be advanced to the landlords, but he should be glad to see the works under the baronial sessions pushed on. Nothing had been more unsatisfactory in the history of Ireland than the way in which the baronial sessions had been dealt with. In some instances no loans had been applied for, and no presentment had been made by the sessions. In one case, in respect of to which he had been in correspondence with the Local Government Board, and in which he could get no answer to his communications, what had happened was this. In the Union of Clifden they had the special sessions for the baronial presentments; and a large amount of work was brought forward, and a certain amount was assented to. Some disturbance, however, took place in court, and the presiding magistrate then declined to go on with the business, and not only refused to go on with the business, but assumed the right to cancel all the presentments that had been passed. He believed that that act was entirely illegal; but the result was that a very large district had been thrown entirely upon private charity. It was stated by the hon. Member for Cork (Mr. Parnell) that £580,000 had been given away in private charity, and that that money came largely from the United States, from Australia, and other British Colonies, and to a certain small extent from England. He wished to express his great regret that England had done so little to help Ireland at this crisis. He might say that England herself had contributed almost nothing to the distress in Ireland; for if it had not been for the exertions of the Mansion House Committee, under the present Lord Mayor of London, he did not think that anything whatever would have been contributed. It was the wish of the Government now to stimulate out-door relief in Ireland. In his opinion, the giving of out-door relief had a most demoralizing effect. He had witnessed with his own eyes, and the same thing had happened in various parts of Ireland, that the recipients of eleemosynary relief were demoralized by the system of giving food and clothing without asking anything in return for it. He would never forgive the Government of the right hon. Gentleman who sat upon the Opposition Benches for its conduct in this respect. The late Government did nothing else than shift the responsibility of the Irish famine from their own shoulders to those of others. They had left behind them a cruel heritage of incapacity on their part for dealing with a great crisis, and they had left behind them seeds of evil in the country which would produce incalcuable injury. They had attempted to meet this crisis by simply depending upon charity, upon the chanty of the whole civilized world, if not of this Kingdom. Would the noble Lord tell him how much of that Charitable Fund of £500,000 came from England? If the amount were £150,000, that was but a small thing in comparison with the whole amount. If the Government decided to continue, as it seemed inclined to do, for the remaining three or four months of the distress, the system of relief without work, then, in his opinion, they would only add to the evil that had already been done. The present Government might rise to the crisis, and they had ample time and opportunity for doing so. He should advise them to send down into the most distressed districts persons of practical experience who, instead of inducing the Guardians to give out-door relief in the shape of charity, could refuse to give the Board of Guardians anything except for the purpose of carrying on reproductive works. Let the Government offer to the Board of Guardians loans at 1 per cent, as they had so lavishly offered the landlords. If they would do that, and take care that the money was properly expended, and the works were judiciously designed, it would then enable them to reap some good out of the evil which had occurred. But there was another aspect to this question. It seemed to him that the Board of Works which had the superintendence of the present distress was utterly inadequate to the purpose. More particularly the engineering staff of the Board was exceedingly limited. He believed it was true that the right hon. Gentleman the Chief Secretary had within the last fortnight desired the Board of Works to increase its engineering staff; but, even then, further improvement was requisite. If the Government wished to get some works carried out, and to do some good to the country, and to prevent the people from sinking still further into a state of pauperism, the machinery to do it was ready to their hand. If the Government now in power used the opportunity of remedying the acts of its Predecessors— if they would only adopt the view taken by the Government during the time that the former famine prevailed, he thought they would do much to redress the evil which had occurred. Another thing to be considered was what was the magnitude of this crisis, and what had been done to relieve it? It had been said that the loss to the small farmers in Ireland, by reason of the failure of potatoes, amounted to no less than £5,000,000. At all events, that was the result of the Return upon the subject. They also learnt that the landlords had lost in rent no less a sum than £3,000,000. Who could tell the misery that had been caused in private families by the loss of that sum of £3,000,000? That loss of £3,000,000 was said to have been again to the tenants; but whether it was or was not, would be seen in the future. At all events, it was no gain to them to lose £5,000,000 in potatoes; and what had been done to meet that loss? The right hon. Gentlemen told them that £1,250,000 had been applied for by the landlords, and that loans had been assented to. The Committee must not suppose it was at all likely that all that money would be spent. All that had been issued at present was the first instalment, amounting to about £198,000. There was no proof that the second and third instalments of that £1,250,000 would ever be applied for, even if they would be granted. It was so easy for people to get the first instalment; it was such an easy matter, that almost anybody could get a loan. In the first instance, the Government refused to acknowledge the existence of the crisis at all. Then they made their terms for borrowing so absurdly high, in asking 6 percent, that the months of October, November, and December, when loans could have been usefully applied, slipped away. Then from having been over anxious to recoup the Exchequer they fell into the opposite extreme, and issued loans to landlords at I per cent. Almost everyone applied for a loan, and most of those loans were santioned; but only about £200,000 had yet been issued. He believed that of the £1,250,000 sanctioned, a very considerable proportion would never bear inspection, and that the Board of Works would not pay the future instalments. As a matter of fact, that money would do very little good in the country; but if the Government even now would sanction loans for works carried out on the recommendation of the baronial sessions, they would do something permanently to recoup the outlay. The subject was too extensive a one to go into fully on that occasion; but he did hope the right hon. Gentleman would consider that it was not his duty simply to tread in the footsteps of his Predecessors, but to do much more to weather this crisis. The system of teaching people to look simply for eleemosynary aid was, in his opinion, destructive to the national character, and would be attended with very serious results. It was necessary for the Government to throw away the idea of charity, and to give no more relief except to aged or young persons, who, of course, must be fed; but, with that exception, they should give no more relief except in respect of works. There was no difficulty in the institution of those works, for there were in Ireland several large railway companies who would take the money to make branch lines of railway, if they could get a loan from the Government at a small percentage. Cases had frequently happened, in which he had been in communication with the Government lately in power, of this character; but he need hardly say that they never got the smallest satisfaction from the then Chief Secretary. There were other cases in which the Board of Guardians were perfectly willing, if power were given them, to guarantee the re-payment of the principal money and the interest, but, whenever any communications had taken place with the Government for the purpose of conferring this power upon the Boards of Guardians, they had been unsuccessful. The late Government seemed to be of opinion that nothing should be done that was reproductive and useful, and that their exertions ought to be confined to giving money away by means of charity. He earnestly hoped that the Government would consider this question, and would be of a opinion that a quid pro quo ought to be given for all the money applied in relief of the distress.

said, that the Government had to relieve distress which would almost certainly continue to exist between the present time and the be ginning of the next harvest. His hon. Friend the Member for Galway (Mr. Mitchell Henry) had said that they did not rely in Ireland upon these charitable funds, but that engineers should be sent over to commence works of a reproductive character for the purpose of giving emplopment to the people; but were the hon. Member in the position which he (Mr. W. E. Forster) occcupied, he believed the hon. Member would never thing of carrying out that project, because no number of engineers who might go down could start the necessary works in time to prevent the people from starving before the end of the period to which he had alluded, and it would be impossible in the time which the Government had at their disposal to get the works in operation, and to rely upon them solely for the relief of distress where it was most severely felt. The experience of the last famine in Ireland must also be borne in mind, although he did not wish to compare the distress of the present year with that of the Famine of 1847. At that time the principle upon which the relief began was simply payment for labour upon reproductive works. It was found, however, that the relief afforded in that way did not reach the destitute, and that the works would not be reproductive. It was, therefore, found necessary to change from a system of reproductive works to that of relief. He maintained, what he had stated at an earlier part of the evening, that the Government had chiefly to rely upon out-door relief, with as little pressure as possible on the impoverished Guardians and with as much prevention as possible of imposition. He entirely agreed with his hon. Friend that the question of reproductive works in Ireland ought not to be lost sight of, and that there were many cases in which a recurrence of distress in future years might be made much less likely by the encouragement of such works. They might expect, in that case, to hear less about the demoralization of the labourer by receiving relief in place of labour; but it must also be borne in mind that there was demoralization in receiving a loan and not repaying it, for which reason the Government would have to be pretty confident that loans advanced for such a purpose would be repaid. He was obliged to add, however, that he dare not rely merely upon reproductive works to relieve the distress of the next three months.

said, he did not wish to enter into any full discussion of the measures recommended by the late Government. He agreed that the present was not a convenient time for doing so; but he wished to say, with regard to some of the very severe remarks which had been made upon the conduct of the late Government and the measures introduced by them, that he failed to understand what were the precise points upon which complaint had been made. He had listened to complaints of such an extremely diverse and opposite character that he wondered upon what principle it was felt they had gone wrong, and supposed that it might be upon the general principle that the late Government was respon- sible for all the evils that had come upon Ireland during their term of Office. He had heard it stated that it was a very wrong thing to demoralize Ireland by pauperizing the people by giving them relief in a direct form instead of supplying them with labour, and allowing them to earn it for themselves. But that was precisely the principle which the late Government had at the first laid down for themselves. They said, as far as possible we shall endeavonr to meet this distress coming upon the country by means which shall be shorn of those demoralizing gifts to which reference had been made. Then came the question how were they to meet the demands for obtaining labour? It was necessary that some provision should be made; was it to be done by loans for public works, or by loans in some other manner? There were great objections to loans for public works. The hon. Member for Galway (Mr. Mitchell Henry) had pointed out that this was the right measure, in his opinion, to be adopted; but he (Sir Stafford Northcote) ventured to think it would not be a measure applicable to the great proportion of the distressed districts, and that it would be exposed to very serious inconvenience and danger. The hon. Member had also indicated the kind of works, such as railways, which might be made in various parts of Ireland. That point, too, had been considered by the late Government, who were, of course, anxious to take into consideration the propriety of making railways and other public works. But they had been obliged to ask themselves the question, "What is the use of setting on foot a railway 50 miles distant from that district which you want to relieve?" Again, such works might have the effect of drawing away persons from their other occupations, and they might have had the effect of drawing navvies from England, while they failed to relieve the people in Donegal, Kerry, and other parts of Ireland where the greatest want was experienced. Further, they could not help feeling that if they made advances to a railway company, that company might very naturally say, it is desirable we should get labour on the best terms we can in order to make the best use of the money lent, and in order to make the undertaking pay we must get labour from a distance. He did not say they had formed a right judgment, because they might have been misled into making advances to persons or bodies who were themselves interested in the districts where they desired to give labour, and who would have both an interest in seeing that the people were employed and that the labour was profitably made use of. Therefore, they made offers to landlords who, unfortunately, were themselves impoverished at that time, and not in a position to aid freely in carrying out works of improvement. The hon. Member for Galway had just pointed out that the sum of £3,000,000 had been lost to this class by the failure of rents, which exactly corresponded to the case presented to the late Government that the land lords were not in a position to spend freely on the works in question. They, there fore, came forward with a plan to enable landlords to spend money in their own districts by relaxing the terms upon which the grants would be made. The hon. Member for Galway had said that they had at first proposed to give money at 6 percent, and that when they found they could not obtain that they offered advances at 1 per cent. But that was not a correct statement of the case; they had never offered money at 6 per cent interest, but at 3½ per cent, and there was to be a sinking fund for the re-payment of the money. Undoubtedly, when they made that offer, they hoped the landlords would take up the money and give employment; but they found that they were unable or unwilling to do so, so that that mode of attempting to give employment failed. Then they considered it their duty to make a much more liberal offer in order to induce persons to expend money in the employment of labour, and the hon. Gentleman had rather reflected upon them in saying that those terms were too advantageous. Whether it might have been possible to get loans at rates of interest between 3½ and 1 per cent he was unable to say, because he had had no experience in that respect; but time was pressing, and they therefore made the offer on the terms indicated, which had resulted in applications from persons in different parts of the country who were willing to spend money in the employment of labour. But it was necessary that they should look into various points, and to take care that if this were not to be a demoralizing charity the advances, al- though made on liberal terms, should be made as loans with the intention of repayment, and, further, that such loans were not abused. Again, they had to consider how far the employment of people upon those works might distract them from the important work of cultivating the land. They knew that if offers were made of a different character, the people might go away and neglect that which they ought to do. Then, they had the experience of 1847. They knew that there had been great abuse at that time, and that people had gone off to the public works and neglected the tillage of the land and that it was owing to that fact that the second year's famine had been worse than the first. Then came the result to which the right hon. Gentleman had referred, and which was inevitable—that the works altogether failed, and that they had been compelled to resort to a system absolutely necessary, but demoralizing— that of supplying the people with cooked food. Although, in a complicated matter of that kind, it was impossible to say that mistakes had not been committed, or that some other system might not have resulted more beneficially, he ventured to say that the attention and the whole mind of the late Government had been given to that matter, and that every step taken was with the fullest and most ample consideration, and that there was nothing approaching to negligence in dealing with the case; that they endeavoured as far as possible to keep in view those principles which lay at the root of the question of relief. And he might fairly claim that wherever there was a doubt as to the policy of a particular course, they should solve it by giving the readiest possible relief to the sufferers. He utterly repudiated the reflections which had been passed upon the late Government. They regarded public works, although they might in certain circumstances be useful, as a most dangerous mode of relief, and a thing not to be relied upon. This had been shown by the proceedings of the baronial sessions, which in many cases, being anxious to prevent abuse, had refused to make any presentments, because they believed they could not properly be made, and he thought that the evidence which the right hon. Gentleman had supplied showed that their liberal offers to the landlords had produced applications which had given a considerable amount of assistance. One statement of the right hon. Gentleman he noticed with great satisfaction, which was the larger area of land that had been sowed with potatoes, and these were of a better quality than had been sown for many years. He maintained that this constituted a point of comparison and contrast between the Famine of 1847 and the pressure and distress of the present year, which, as far as it had gone, had shown that the measures taken by the late Government, and continued by the present Government, contrasted not unfavourably with those adopted in times of former distress.

said, he did not rise to discuss or formally censure the action of the late Government, especially as they were on the wrong side of the Table. Had they been in occupation of the Treasury Bench, he should very likely have had a good deal to say about them. Those who lived in Ireland, and saw famine impending, had felt it their duty to lay the case prominently before the late Government. In doing so, they did not ask for anything like charity; but from Irish Members of Parliament, from Corporations in Ireland, and from the Catholic Bishops the strongest representations had been made as to the need of employment for the purposes of relief. There was an unanimous cry not for charity, but for some kind of employment for the people. From his own experience he could state that such was the feeling of the people themselves. There was nothing which, looking forward to last winter, they dreaded more than charity of a demoralizing kind. For three months the Government had given no answer whatever. At the very time that the arrangements for public works would necessarily have to be made, why was there such a small sum applied to drainage" purposes? The winter passed when drainage should have been initiated. He believed the late Government, on the whole, and especially the Members of it in that House, had been anxious to do the best they could, and they did do as much as could be expected of Gentlemen who knew nothing at all about Ireland. As long as Ireland was governed from England by Gentlemen who knew nothing about Ireland so long would the Government be throwing away money, and doing acts in which they meant well, but which would produce no result for the permanent benefit of Ireland. An answer, however, had been received from the late Government, for the then Prime Minister went to a City banquet and blew the trumpet of English charity. He had not taken a statesman-like view of the impending famine in Ireland, and his Government, although they jumbled about for a few weeks, had acted in an imperfect manner. During the last Parliament Irish Members had gone into all this question of reproductive works and the employment of labour, and had moved Resolutions; but they got very little by doing so. He asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland what ho was going to do for the next three months? If the Government would expend £1,500,000 from the Church Fund, he believed it might be utilized for some great national purpose; but that would not be done. A harbour here, or tramway there, would require a special Act of Parliament; but ho said bring in a Bill over-riding special Acts of Parliament: at any rate, let earth works be made for railways. He knew places where the county would guarantee money, but where the work would not be undertaken if they had to obtain an Act of Parliament. It would seem that there was some want of harmony between the different Boards in Ireland. In a Poor Law Union, of which he was a Guardian, they resolved to do some work of an important character; but the Local Government Board said—"We will not let you do it; you must do it by a sub-contract." The county surveyor, whom the grand jury and the ratepayers were perfectly willing to trust, was not allowed to do the work without a sub-contract, and the Union were now looking at the work and could not move a step, while plenty of people were wanting employment. The Local Government Board had also absolutely told them that they were not to employ any men at more than 7s. 6d. a-week, while every farmer was paying 7s. or 8s. a-week to men near towns, and giving them bounties and places for gardens. The Chief Secretary for Ireland said that that was not his Department, but was in the Department of the Treasury; but the manner in which the Treasury and other Departments played at cross purposes, when work was to be done, was most extraordinary. He had been written to last year by a gentleman who was now in the House, asking him if he could make any suggestions, and he had replied that 'if the gentleman would come up with 50"boys,"they would meet in Dublin, go to the Board of Works, and clear it out. They would then sit there for six months with half-a-dozen clerks and some engineers, and there would soon cease to be anything like distress in Ireland. He entreated the Chief Secretary for Ireland, who was a man of business, to go to Ireland, and not to mind Mr. Bourke, or anyone else, who was so swathed in red tape that ho could not move in any direction. Let the Government give the general Bill which he (Mr. Shaw) had suggested for an advance of £600,000 or £700,000, and they might depend on it the distress would be banished from many districts.

said, he deeply regretted that the matter should have been discussed in a Party spirit. This had been introduced somewhat by the hon. Member for Galway (Mr. Mitchell Henry), and, if possible, rather more by the hon. Member for the County of Cork (Mr. Shaw). He could not understand why the hon. Member for the County of Cork, who was entitled to be heard with respect, thought it worth while and necessary to introduce his observations by a very strong, and, as it appeared to him (Mr. Gibson), uncalled-for attack upon the measures taken by the late Government. The duty of the Government was not to interfere, either too soon or too late, in matters of this kind. It was necessary, above all things, not to demoralize the people by interfering too soon, and to avoid the terrible responsibility of delaying interference too long. In criticizing the conduct of the late Government in that respect, it should not be forgotten that no single death could be attributed to the recent distress in Ireland, and that in no single workhouse in Ireland had the accommodation been entirely exhausted. These were broad facts which should not be forgotten when this question was under consideration. The hon. Member for the County of Cork, when ho passed away from his Party attack, proceeded to deal with one or two points of practical importance and general interest. The Act of Parliament, the details of which the hon. Member had probably forgotten, was passed at the instance of the late Government. If the hon. Member would consider the instructions given by the late Government to the Local Government Board, he would find that such instructions, upon which he had commented with great severity—instructions which compelled the presentment sessions to proceed by contract and upon fixed prices—was based upon broad and obvious questions and grounds of public policy. There was nothing, however, to prevent the present Government from revoking modifying, or altering any of the provisions so made. But, pending such alterations, he ventured to ask every man of common sense whether such restrictions were not perfectly reasonable and prudent?

asked whether a similar restriction was imposed upon the landlords in regard to loans made to them?

said, he should conduct his argument as his own discretion suggested. His intention was to deal with certain points which had been raised, and the extremely logical mind of the hon. Member for Cork County must show him how wrong it would be to depart from those topics. He thought that the late Government acted wisely and rightly in dealing with the particular subject-matter under discussion in the way they did, and in prescribing that the works authorized by extraordinary presentment sessions should be conducted on a basis of contract. If, however, the present Government thought the restriction ought to be removed, there was nothing to prevent them from making a proposal of the kind, and he should not oppose a hostile or Party comment to any such proposal. Then with regard to the rate of wages paid to men employed on the works presented at these sessions, he could not admit that the Government would have been justified in adopting a rate of payment which would have brought them into conflict with the ordinary employers of labour in any particular locality. The adoption of such a course would not have been to afford any relief to distress, but to squander public money. The late Government decided upon the course which they adopted after carefully considering the responsibility which was placed upon them in the crisis that oc- curred; but it was perfectly open to the right hon. Gentleman the Chief Secretary for Ireland to alter or modify the plan then adopted, in view of a new consideration of what would be assumed to be new facts. The hon. Member for Galway County (Mr. Mitchell Henry) had made remarks even more uncharitable than those of the hon. Member for Cork City, seeing the despondent condition at the present moment of the Party recently in power. Although there were three Funds which had collected large sums for the relief of the existing distress, the hon. Member had expressed a hope that charity would cease. This struck ordinary men as a very strong observation, requiring a very strong defence; yet, after saying this, the hon. Member proceeded to commit himself.

complained that he had been misunderstood. What he really said was that he hoped the distribution of charity would cease, unless it was accompanied by a quid pro quo in the shape of reproductive works.

said, he saw no difference between his own statement and the hon. Member's explanation, if in future there was to be no distribution of charity unless there was to be a quid pro quo in the shape of reproductive labour. The hon. Member did not condescend to the vulgarity of detail; that was left to the practical common sense of the Member for the County of Cork, who fell back upon his old friends the earth works. He would remind the hon. Member of the words used by the right hon. Gentleman near him (Sir Stafford North-cote) on the subject of great responsibility attaching to the sanctioning of anything in the nature of so-called reproductive works. If such works were to be undertaken, they should be undertaken for the benefit of the persons whom it was desired to relieve; and if employment was to be given, how was it to be decided as to whom the employment should be offered to? If railway works were suggested, as indeed they had been suggested, by the hon. Member for Cork County, how were they to exclude the people who were responsible for the construction of the railways from employing those workmen who knew most about the particular class of work-people who might be drawn from England, or from the Northern or other parts of Ireland, who were not greatly distressed? They must remember the vast difficulty met with, but not overcome, in the unfortunate Famine years of 1846 and 1848, when relief works, which were called reproductive, competed with the ordinary works of the country, and drew workmen away from such works. It would, he believed, be found on inquiry that the late Government took the wisest course, and that the soundest justification for such course was to be found in its success. At the same time, he admitted that they would have been censurable if they had not acted in a cautious and tentative manner. They commenced in the first instance with the moderate offers contained in the Circular of the 22nd of November, 1879, and there were Papers before Parliament showing that for months before that time the Local Government Board in Ireland had been in the closest and most immediate communication with the Government in Dublin and London, and had been making a close, anxious, and earnest investigation of the entire position of the country. That Circular of the 22nd of November was availed of to the extent of many thousands of pounds, though not to an extent sufficient to cope with the whole of the distress which existed. Then, oppressed with a keen, earnest, and painful sense of responsibility, the late Government in January last found it necessary to issue a further Circular, the offer contained in which had been also availed of to a very large extent—an extent which he hoped would be sufficient to grapple with a great deal of the existing distress. They had, however, heard from the right hon. Gentleman the Chief Secretary for Ireland that he deemed some further measures necessary; and he was sure that all classes of Members in the House would consider such measures, when brought before them, with a most anxious desire to make them as complete as possible, with a view to settling this unfortunate and difficult question of distress in Ireland.

said, it was perfectly plain to anyone that, in the view of the right hon. Gentleman the Chief Secretary for Ireland, the chief brunt of the distress in Ireland for the next three or four months must fall upon the out-door relief system. A great deal of money had been advanced already, and a great deal more would have to be advanced for the purpose of drainage and for public works; but, notwithstanding all these things, the right hon. Gentleman said that it was on out-door relief that the burden of the next four months must fall; and that the necessities of that period were likely to exceed the period of necessity through which they had passed. What followed from this? They were called upon to spend more money in the next four months, and that money was to come out of the pockets of the ratepayers. This suggested very serious consideration, for he believed it would result in many families who were now beyond the necessity for relief being at no very remote period brought within such necessity by reason of the heavier rates which they would be called upon to pay. He saw no reason why the Boards of Guardians should not be allowed to raise the funds required for this out-door relief by loans.

said, that, in every such case, the Boards of Guardians would have the power referred to by the hon. and learned Member.

would like to know whether, when there was an instruction conveyed to a Board of Guardians to give out-door relief, it would be accompanied by an offer of a loan to enable them to meet it? There were many cases in which out-door relief had been given in large amounts, to which the offer of the right hon. Gentleman did not apply, because such relief had not been given in pursuance of an order from the Local Government Board, but spontaneously. It seemed hard that such Boards of Guardians should be placed at a disadvantage as compared with other Boards which simply carried out orders received from head-quarters. He trusted that the right hon. Gentleman would not be slow to give the orders for the distribution of additional out-door relief, and that measures would be taken to prevent the main burthen of relieving the distress in the next four months from falling on the backs of the ratepayers. He knew three or four parishes in which the occupiers had made no applications for loans to improve their lands, but where the Guardians had felt bound to give exceptional out-door relief, a course which had entailed simple ruin upon the poorer ratepayers in the district, a ruin which would extend to ratepayers of a higher grade if the Guardians were not promptly enabled to raise money on loan. He hoped the right hon. Gentleman would seriously consider the advisability of affording relief to those Guardians of the Poor who had already raised the scale of out-door relief from a sense of duty, and without pressure from the authorities. He thought his hon. Friend the Member for Galway (Mr. Mitchell Henry) had been hardly treated in having it imputed to him that he wished to see all charitable relief stopped. As he understood his hon. Friend, all he said was that, in future, the Government would take such steps as might obviate the necessity for such relief by employing the people in the development of the natural resources of the country. Something had been said about the duty of the Imperial Parliament as far as Ireland was concerned, and he, for one, thought that the Parliament owed something more to his country than a loan out of a Fund which was the property of Ireland, to be repaid at a future time. The history of the distresses through which the country had passed showed that their roots lay in the bad laws of the country, under which many thousands of acres of land lay waste which might be turned to profitable account as providing food for the people. The tenants were deterred from improving their holdings because they had not a fair tenure of the land, and in this patent fact lay the root of the distress. The late Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, who was no Horne.Kuler, or even Liberal, but a staunch Conservative, had said, speaking only a few days ago, that it would be the dawning of a better day when ameliorative measures were passed for Ireland. It was indeed in the power of Parliament, by making better laws, to mitigate and ameliorate the existing distress, and to prevent similar visitations in the future. He would ask Her Majesty's Government to do for Ireland what the Governments of other countries wore doing at the present moment. The Congress of the United States was voting a sum of money for the relief of Irish distress; and the Dominion Parliament of Canada was taking a similar course. He could not think that the Imperial Parliament would consent to be behind the Governments of America and Canada in this respect, especially in view of the fact that it was directly answerable for the state of things which existed. He was not, in saying this, making any appeal to the Imperial Parliament, but was setting forth what he thought to be simply a just and fair demand; for he could not think it was a justifiable on any grounds that, in this country recourse should be had for the relief of Irish distress to funds which were intended for other and entirely different purposes.

said, that in the last Session, when the Government expressed readiness to grant facilities for the making of reproductive works, he brought forward the case of the Clare Castle Harbour, which, in his view, might be made into a serviceable harbour, by the expenditure of a moderate sum of money, but had been allowed to sink into disuse, although the harbour at one time produced an income of some £3,000 from dues. As he understood, in July last, there was a readiness to made an advance of £2,000, as representing the surplus income which the Irish Board of Works had derived from the harbour. Well, October came, and nothing further was done. He again called the attention of the Government to the matter and impressed upon them the necessity of advancing a sum of £2,000 or £3,000 to be expended among a very small industrial community, and in a very poor centre of Ireland. The Government expressed its desire to do something, and said the matter should have their anxious consideration. They did the same in January; but, from the first time, they expressed their willingness to do something for Ireland in return for what Ireland had done for them. He believed that no surveyor had ever been sent down, and the promise to do something for Clare Castle Harbour still remained unfulfilled. He pointed out the matter now to the right hon. Gentleman the now Chief Secretary for Ire- land, in the hope that his serious con- sideration would be given to Clare Castle Harbour, and that he would be able to see his way towards giving some prac-tical proof of his sympathy for the people of Ireland by commencing in reality the construction of reproductive works. He agreed with his hon. and learned Friend the Member for Limerick (Mr. O'Shaughnessy), that until Ireland had the complete control of her own local affairs, the House of Commons would find itself unable to deal with a contented and pacified Ireland.

said, he was afraid, from some of the remarks which had been made in the course of the discussion by the right hon. Gentleman the Chief Secretary for Ireland, that the right hon. Gentleman viewed the situation very much from the standpoint of the Local Government Board in Ireland. The right hon. Gentleman had professed a great anxiety to assist the poor by putting in force a system of out-door relief in preference to a system of baronial public works. He was afraid the real reason why outdoor relief was preferred by the official world in Ireland was that they thought they could control the Poor Law Unions more directly and more in accordance with their own will than they could the Boards that would have to pass the baronial works. Now, he thought that if this was intended to indicate a policy of throwing over the baronial public works and of establishing in their place a large system of out-door relief, the carrying into effect of such a policy would create serious and evil results in Ireland. He was ready to allow that the action of the Public Board of Works might really succeed in putting a stop to the carrying out of public works, and, indeed, as far as he was able to make out, the action of the public authority had been successfully exerted in doing this already. But, nevertheless, he was of opinion that it would be a much more difficult task to establish a system of out-door relief. There was a great deal of feeling against out-door relief in Ireland, and he was quite satisfied, from what he knew of the wishes of the people, that the Government would never succeed in establishing such a system. All that they would succeed in doing would be, under the authority of the Chief Secretary for Ireland, to stop the public works. They would entirely fail in substituting out-door relief, and the result would inevitably be that—especially in the West of Ireland—there would be great suffering and distress. He thought he would be justified in saying that the Hoard of Works in Ireland and the Local Government Board, between them, had succeeded in stopping the execution of public works in Ireland to a very remarkable extent. From the figures given by the Chief Secretary for Ire- land, it seemed that the baronial sessions had passed £185,000 for public works— that was to say, that they had agreed to £185,000 worth of public works being executed. The baronial sessions were not rash people and could not be accused of recklessly spending too much money, or of throwing money away for the sake of relieving those who were in distress. On the contrary, the opposite charge might be preferred against them— namely, that they were far too economical and had an objection against doing more public works than they could help, or, indeed, of studying the general interests of the country. The Chief Secretary for Ireland told them that although £l85.000had been passed by the baronial sessions for public works, the sum had been cut down to £86,000, and that public works to the extent of £86,000 only had been authorized. Prom all that he (Major Nolan) heard from local sources, he feared the Chief Secretary for Ireland was right, and that a very-large amount of these public works had been cut down, and would not be put into execution. He knew from sources entirely independent of the right hon. Gentleman that the works had been cut down. A barony was, in reality, a large Union, and there was a large barony in the county of Galway, in regard to which he believed that works to the extent of £160 only had been passed by the Dublin Board. The result was that the public works in the locality in question would not keep the poor people of the barony in employment for a week or 10 days. There were several other places from which the same complaint proceeded. He held in his hand a letter which he had received only that evening, in the course of the debate, and some statements contained in it had made considerable impression on his mind. It was a letter that was certainly not meant to be read in the House of Commons, and it was written by the Bishop of Clonfert, than whom no man knew the country better. The writer said—"We are now coming to a crucial month. I find that intense distress exists among the labourers and the small tenants."[Mr. W. E. PORSTER asked what was the locality referred to in the letter?] It was Loughrea; the Bishop dated from Loughkee, and spoke of the locality. Alluding to another place, the writer said there were no works going on there of any kind, and the people of the district would be considerably demoralized if the Public Board in Dublin did not change their policy and insist upon public works being established in the district of Loughrea and in various other localities. The Chief Secretary for Ireland told them now that £86,000 of public works had been passed; but he (Major Nolan) did not believe that even works to that amount would be executed. The right hon. and learned Gentleman the late Attorney General for Ireland (Mr. Gibson) strongly impressed upon the Chief Secretary for Ireland the desirability of having all public works executed by contract. That was, no doubt, a good general principle if they could carry it out; but when they were dealing with a famine, or a period of great scarcity, they would find that it would be impossible to carry it out. He believed the regulations which had been made in regard to contract would have considerable effect in stopping the execution of the £86,000 worth of works which had been authorized. They had already interfered, to his own knowledge, with some of these public works. And the reason was this—a very great many conditions had been imposed by the late Government upon the execution of the works. One was that not more than £300 should be granted for any work, and another was that every work should be finished before a fresh grant was made. It was stipulated that the baronal sessions should not order any portion of work to be done, but must complete and finish it entirely. In many cases it became impossible to fulfil these conditions, and, consequently, the works were not undertaken. Having now passed certain works, he hoped that Her Majesty's Government would give the assistance required from them, and enable the works already commenced to be completed. The secretary of the grand jury might call an extraordinary meeting of the baronial sessions, and, with the consent of the authorities in Dublin, might allow the works already commenced and not completed to be continued under the directions of the county surveyor. If that were not done there would be great delay. It involved a considerable waste of time to get the baronial sessions together, and unless the course he suggested were adopted a number of the public works already passed must inevitably be postponed. And this was not the only difficulty about executing this £86,000 of works. There was another matter in addition to the condition that all the works undertaken must be completely executed—namely, not more than a limited sum should be devoted to any one given work. Many very small contractors had contracted to execute work, men with limited means and resources. One of them told him that he could not execute the work he had undertaken to carry out for the money. Of course, ho (Major Nolan) told the man that it was all his own fault; but he believed there was a certain amout of truth in the assertion that many of these works had been undertaken for less than would be necessary to execute them. He had received both a letter and a telegram informing him that in certain cases contracts had been entered into at too low a rate, because the persons tendering believed that no penalties could be enforced against them if the work was not carried out. The result was, that other and more substantial contractors were driven out of the field and deterred from competing, and there was no remedy against such a state of things. Neither the Government nor the baronial sessions could do anything in the matter, although it was evident that if the work was not done the people would be reduced to a state of semi-starvation. This was one of the difficulties which the Board in Dublin and the Chief Secretary for Ireland had to contend with; it was for them to see that the works were executed, although in many many cases they had been commenced without being completed. The contractors believed that there was no power to compel them to be executed, and the result was that in more than one case the contracts had not been carried out. The remedy he would suggest would be a very simple one, although up to the present time he had no indication of its adoption. It was to require the country surveyor to execute the works where the contractor failed to fulfil his contract. He did not see that any harm would follow from such a course. The baronial sessions would have to pay for it, and in carrying out the contracts the labourers would be employed upon the work who could not be employed in any other way. He was altogether in favour of the system of contracts himself; but he knew perfectly well that work of this nature could not be done entirely by contract. He had told the Committee what was taking place at the present moment, and there was every reason to believe that a number of the authorized works would not be executed at all unless some settled power were given in regard to contracts. 80 much for the baronial works. In regard to the money advanced, he confessed that he did not understand the figures which had been given by the Chief Secretary for Ireland. The right hon. Gentleman said that £183,000 had been advanced, and that altogether £1,200,000 was to be granted to landlords for improvements. The right hon. Gentleman was to bring in a Bill for £1,200,000, or some such sum. Now, he (Major Nolan) believed that all the improvements were to be executed by the month of August; and did the right hon. Gentleman believe that works or improvements to the extent of £1,000,000 would be carried out by the landlords between the present time and the month of August? He believed that one of the conditions of the advance was that the work was to be done by a definite time.

said, his hon. and gallant Friend was mistaken. The landlords were to have as much time as they pleased. The restrictions as to time related only to the sanitary works.

believed that it would amount very much to the same thing. It appeared that a sum of only £183,000 had been advanced or spent up to the present time by the landlords, and the amount remaining to be spent was £1,000,000. This sum of £1,000,000 either had reference to works of improvements which were supposed to be carried out in the course of the next three months; or if the Chief Secretary for Ireland was conscious that the money for which he was about to bring in a Bill was not to be spent in the next three months, then the work to which it was intended to apply could hardly be called a relief work. It certainly was not a relief work to enable them to tide over the time of harvest. Out of the £1,000,000, he did not believe that more than £200,000 would be spent in the course of the next three months. The state of the country, then, was this. Owing to the great charity of America and Australia, and to a lesser degree to that of England, the people of Ireland had been enabled to live through the sowing time. This was to no inconsiderable extent owing to the late Government having taken a precaution for which they were entitled to the fullest credit—namely, to their having allowed the Seeds Bill to pass. In consequence of the passing of that Bill, the people of Ireland had been enabled to sow their land; and now what they wanted to do was to tide over the next three months without becoming demoralized. If the right hon. Gentleman the Chief Secretary for Ireland would see that the baronial works were executed and spread properly over the country, he would materially aid in the good work. At present, in some districts they were doing too much, while in others they were almost doing nothing at all. It was the duty of Her Majesty's Government to see that the proper amount of public works was undertaken, and that it was spread evenly over the country. But, above everything, it was their duty to pass the necessary works at once, and see that they were executed. By that means they would be able to tide over the crisis without demoralizing the people. If, on the other hand, they attempted to enforce the system of giving out-door relief in Ireland, he warned the right hon. Gentleman that he would have every man's hand against him. The Boards of Guardians were altogether opposed to the system of out-door relief. The system and its results differed very materially in Ireland from what they were in England. In England the money did not fall upon the parish, but was spread over the whole Union; whereas, in Ireland, the out-door relief was altogether distinct from the in-door relief. The in-door relief was charged to the whole Union, but the out-door relief was paid exclusively by the electoral divisions in which it was administered. The consequence was that the local divisions, where there were the most people and the largest number of small tenants, felt the pressure most heavily. The effect of resorting to a system of out-door relief would be, in the first place, to pauperize the smaller districts, and in the next to make the Boards of Guardians extremely unwilling indeed to administer out-door relief. He believed if the right hon. Gentleman resorted to a system of out-door relief, he would have to throw all his energy into it before he would succeed in forcing it upon the Unions. Even if the right hon. Gentleman did succeed in forcing it upon the Unions, he (Major Nolan) believed that it would work exceedingly badly and unsatisfactorily, and that its only result would be to demoralize the people who were supplied with relief under it. On the other hand, if the right hon. Gentleman trusted chiefly to public works, and showed the same energy in extending them and carrying them out that he appeared to have shown in cutting them down, he would secure the satisfactory progress of the good work which he professed to have at heart.

(who rose with Mr. W. E. FORSTER) said, he would only interpose for a moment between the right hon. Gentleman and the Committee; indeed, he had only one word to say—he simply wished to remind the Committee that they had now been engaged for two hours and 23 minutes in discussing this Vote, and had not yet passed it.

said, the knowledge and experience he had formed of the work carried on by the Local Government Board in Ireland was altogether opposed to the conclusions arrived at by the hon. and gallant Member for Galway (Major Nolan). The Board seemed to be very anxious to avoid the granting of out-door relief as much as possible, and they had endeavoured to avoid it by substituting employment in its place. The Inspectors employed by the Board were most anxious to encourage useful public works and works of improvement, and it certainly appeared to him to be a very natural desire. The hon. and gallant Gentleman had made two or three suggestions in the course of his remarks; one was that the Government should compel the baronies to make presentments. He thought the Committee would at once see that it was almost impossible to do that. They could not compel people to enter into engagements by which they would be under an obligation to repay money. They must necessarily wait until the baronial sessions made the application themselves.

wished to remind the right hon. Gentleman that the Government took this course in the case of the Poor Law Board. They forced the people to ask for money there.

admitted that the Poor Law Board had a discretionary power, under certain circumstances, of compelling certain things to be done in cases of destitution, and, no doubt, they could compel the Guardians in any district to relieve destitutes. But it was not possible to compel a district to borrow money—which the suggestion of the hon. and gallant Member amounted to in this instance—for the performance of work which the district authorities did not deem to be necessary, and which they thought ought not to be undertaken. If the Government were to make such a proposal, he thought the hon. and gallant Gentleman would see that there would be such an outcry as neither he nor any other Irish Secretary nor any Government would be able to resist. It was altogether impossible to adopt the principle of forcing people to borrow money for the execution of these works. Then the hon. and gallant Gentleman seemed to be of opinion that every application for advances in connection with public works should be granted. Whenever the Board of Works considered that an application made to them was well founded they conceded it; but in some cases, though to a small extent, there was reason to fear presentments had been made for works which were only undertaken for the benefit of the people who were to be employed in carrying them out. There was, to some extent, a check upon the execution of unnecessary works; but the whole question in its details was one of extreme difficulty. The hon. and gallant Member had made several suggestions which he (Mr. W. E. Forster) wished to consider, and one of great value—namely, that where an application had been made, no practical difficulty or delay should be allowed to prevent the work being proceeded with. If the hon. and gallant Gentleman would favour him with a note in writing, showing how that could be done, together with the other points to which he had directed attention, he should feel obliged, and would endeavour to obtain a few hints from the suggestions which had been made. If they were put down in writing, he would be able to see how far they could be carried out in executing these works during the next two or three months. It must not be supposed, however, that the works that were sanctioned were the only works that had been applied for. As he had stated earlier in the evening, the Board of Works Inspectors had, in some instances, pointed out that the works proposed to be undertaken were not required, and in such cases the application had been sent back for re-consideration. The application alluded to by the hon. Member opposite was one which the Board had considered since he (Mr. W. E. Forster) was in Ireland. He had considered most of the applications personally when he was there, and he and the authorities there were struck by the large difference between the amount applied for and the amount sanctioned. He only mentioned the circumstance in order to show that the Local Government Board, for whom ho was responsible, were anxious to get as many of these works commenced as they could.

rose together. The CHAIRMAN called upon Mr. BIGGAR. but

said, he only wished to say a word by way of explanation. He had made no charge whatever against the Local Government Board. It was one of the misfortunes of the situation that they did not know who to blame.

Order, order! Unless the hon. and gallant Member has an explanation to offer, I call upon Mr. Biggar.

was of opinion that the Committee were entitled to have some more definite information from the right hon. Gentleman as to the loans which it was proposed to grant to the landlords for improving their estates. As he understood the matter, it was proposed to lend a very much larger sum than had been lent hitherto to the landlords for works that they were bound to do. He regarded it as a simple means of supplying out-door relief to a few landlords who chose to undertake the drainage of their land, not for the purpose of improving the cultivation for the tenant, but for improving the grass lands, and thus tend to perpetuate the present vicious system that existed in Ireland. He thought that it would be better if the right hon. Gentleman declined to entertain such an idea at all. If he wished to lend money to the landlords for the improvement of their land, let him do so; but let him take care that any money that was lent for the purpose of relief should be used and expended in the course of the next few months. In point of fact, he was disposed to think that the time within which the landlord should be bound to spend the money should be even more rapid than in the case of the sanitary authorities and the presentment sessions, because the work done by the sanitary authorities and the presentment sessions was for the public benefit, while these improvements on the part of the landlords were simply improvements for the benefit of the individual who undertook them, and were of no real advantage to the people except so far as the money paid in wages was concerned. He was not aware how much money the Government proposed to lend to the landlords in Ireland in these improvements at I per cent. He regarded the system of making large advances to the landlords as vicious and preposterous. It was, moreover, thoroughly dishonest, and ought never to have received the sanction of Parliament. Reference had been made by the right hon. and learned Member for the University of Dublin (Mr. Gibson) and by the hon. and gallant Member for Galway County (Major Nolan) to the charity which was involved in the distribution of this money in Ireland. His own opinion was that this system of charity, however well intended, involved a very vicious principle, because there was not the slightest doubt that the money, although distributed in a highly scientific way, was granted to the parties who applied for it by a Central Board in Dublin who had no direct means of obtaining evidence as to the circumstances and requirements of the locality for which the application was made, and were, consequently, unable to say whether the money was really required. At the same time, it was impossible for the authorities who granted the money to know whether the persons who applied for it made their application in honesty and fairness. A few weeks ago he was in the county of Roscommon, and he saw some tenants who had made an application for advances, but had not received them. Their land was surrounded by the land of a pretty large proprietor, whose brother was chairman and agent of the Relief Committee, and these poor people assured him that the agent was in the habit of getting large grants for the tenants of his brother, and of granting comparatively small sums only to other people, notwithstanding the fact that they were evidently in a state of the most abject poverty—in point of fact, some of them had to pawn their clothing in order to keep themselves from starvation. That was the way in which the Government advances were administered. He was satisfied, from what he had seen, of the unfairness with which this system of relief had been carried out. The landlord in question granted the money to his tenants, and then received it back again in payment of rent to himself; so that the money might as well, in the first instance, have gone directly into the pockets of the landlords rather than be granted ostensibly for the support and relief of the poor. He fully concurred with his hon. and gallant Friend the Member for Galway (Major Nolan) that the administration of out-door relief would be a most inconvenient way of providing relief.

said, he wished it to be distinctly understood that it was not in the slightest degree the intention of the Government, nor did they possess the power, to allow further applications to be made by landlords. When he came into Office he found that a certain sum had been granted for the landlords by the late Government, and that applications had been received amounting to £1,200,000. With respect to these applications and to the sums that had been issued, he wished it to be understood that the Government were pledged to carry out the terms of the recent Bill by the action of their Predecessors. But there was no intention of continuing to make those grants and to entertain new applications. In that state of affairs, he perfectly agreed with the remarks of the hon. Member who had stated that they had but a choice of evils before them; they had to consider how little harm they could do in giving relief, bearing in mind the one great duty they had to perform—namely, to see that the people did not die. He believed that the duty he had to perform was a hard one, inasmuch as, while relieving that distress, he had to see that the relief did not take the form of demoralization in the case of out-door relief, or of the demoralization, which was little less objectionable than the other, which resulted from works being badly organized. The policy he had attempted to adopt was entirely supported by his Colleagues and by the officials in Dublin. It was, first, to make the distribution of relief as little demoralizing as possible; and next, to push on all the work they were able to do, according to their present powers. That, he was aware, left another question still open; but it was one, which was not of so much importance at the moment, but rather for future consideration and action—namely, how far the resources of the country could be developed with advantage. During the next two or three months he should try to get all the baronial works into play. They had a most interesting, and to him profitable, discussion about the state of Ireland; but it might be useful for them to recollect that they had several other Votes before them to consider.

said, he did not intend to detain the Committee any length of time. He thought it would be admitted on all hands that, during the last two or three months, baronial sessions had been held and contracts entered into. Those two or three months had expired, and no works were being carried on. He wished to know if there was any intention whatever to carry them out? He heard the right hon. Gentleman the Chief Secretary for Ireland say that the Local Government Board was anxious to carry out works and to give employment. He could tell them that the Board of Guardians of which he was chairman had passed several resolutions, entreating the Local Government Board to institute some works, as their workhouse was quite full. If these works were not carried out, their workhouse would remain quite full. The money which had been forthcoming from charitable sources was well nigh spent. They had the two worst months before them, and little or no employment to offer. He impressed upon the Government the absolute necessity there was that works should be commenced at once, and that the contracts which had been entered into some three months since should be carried out. He should like to hear from the right hon. Gentleman (Mr. W. E. Forster) that he had determined to insist that the works should be carried out where the contracts had been entered into. He was well assured that there would be a vast amount of starva- tion, were it not for the assistance of charity.

said, that he could not agree with the hon. Member for Galway (Mr. Mitchell Henry) as to the futility of the loans to landlords for the purpose of giving employment. He was one of the landlords that took up a loan for that purpose, and ho would give the Committee the benefit of his experience on the subject. The loan that he took up enabled him to employ over 200 heads of families, and he had been able to keep them out of the workhouse between two and three months. He had no hesitation in saying that, as far as he was concerned, the facilities given by the Government for borrowing on easy terms were productive of the greatest benefit. He had made it a rule to pay the men at a rate slightly lower than that given by the farmers; for, if he had given them a higher rate, it would have placed the farmers at a disadvantage. Moreover, whenever a farmer required a certain number of men, he only had to point out what men he wished to have, and they were bound immediately to leave the relief works and place themselves in the service of the farmer for as long a time as he required them. He therefore said, unhesitatingly, that the system of loans to landlords was a step in the right direction, and a system which had been of considerable benefit. He could not agree with the hon. Member for Galway that the terms on which these loans were advanced were too easy. It had been laid out principally in reclaiming wasteland, and the money had been obtained for that purpose at the rate of 3½ per cent, including repayment of principal. The land when reclaimed would not be worth more than 10s. per acre per annum, and it cost at that reduced rate of loan to reclaim about £18. Therefore, it was scarcely remunerative even at that low rate; but it answered very well for the purpose of relieving distress, as well as of bringing permanently into cultivation much waste land. With reference to the baronial presentment sessions, he agreed with what had fallen from the hon. and gallant Member for Galway (Major Nolan) in the course of the debate— namely, that the period of repayment was too short, for it imposed too onerous terms on the ratepayers, requiring them to repay the loans in 15 years, and thus imposing an annual charge of 7½ per cent. He was himself the chairman of a Board of Guardians, and was intimately acquainted with the circumstances of the ratepayers, and he knew that in many Unions they would be unable to repay in the time prescribed. He did not believe that they could bear any additional burden on the rates. In his own district they had been unable to collect the rates which had already accrued. He ventured to make these few remarks on the points that had been raised, because he should be sorry that the right hon. Gentleman the Chief Secretary for Ireland (Mr. W. E. Forster) should suppose that the loans to landlords produced no good effects in alleviating distress. He begged to assure him that the system was one which had not altogether failed.

said, he had listened with great pleasure to the remarks and kindly assurances which fell from the right hon. Gentleman the Chief Secretary for Ireland. There could be no doubt, he feared, that they were approaching the severest period of distress throughout Ireland. He was told that in a leading article of The Freeman's Journal there was a summary containing statements of the ease of the most painful kind. The Mansion House Committee had large and almost unrivalled opportunities for fully sounding the condition of the distress throughout the country. That Committee was the centre of 800 local committees, and had something like 800,000 people on its books in the various localities in the country. At the end of a fortnight from then all the means at its disposal would be exhausted; there would, consequently, be an immense amount of destitution, and those 800,000 people would be thrown upon the resources of another organization, which, indeed, in one respect was political as well as charitable—he referred to the Land League Organization. Hon. Gentlemen might say that the efforts of that League had been of the most feeble nature; but there could be no doubt that, in its charitable aspect, the relief administered by it had been simply indispensable. And he believed that the funds of that League, in consequence of the success with which the sources of charity in America had been tapped, almost entirely through the energetic and patriotic exertions of his distinguished Colleague the hon. Mem- ber for Cork (Mr. Parnell), were not likely to run dry as soon as would those of the Mansion House Committee. But his hon. Friend had said that even those funds would probably soon become exhausted, and he could well conceive why that should be, because, with all the sympathy of the Irish in America, still they could not but feel that the evil of the Irish agrarian system was that which was really the cause, and the permanent cause, of agrarian misery. The Irish in America naturally recommended measures being carried which should remove the political evils, and thus destroy the existing social misery. Considering the difficult task which must fall upon the Government he could not but think that it was eminently desirable that they should utilize promptly those means, extensive and extremely well-informed, of the relief organization of the Land League, spread out as they were all over the country. He thought it would be great economy of organization if, before the Relief Committees came to an end, the Government could come forward in some way, and enter into some arrangement, by which that immense system of relief could be utilized, under the general direction and powerful assistance of the responsible Administration. He felt convinced that, considering the severity of the distress that threatened the country, it would be a great loss, not only to the country, but to the Government, if those immense systems of relief which had been initiated privately should collapse simultaneously with the collapse of their resources. It was a question of permanent interest to the country, and required to be taken into the careful consideration of the Government. He was happy to find that, for the purpose of giving encouragement to the development of Irish Fisheries, the present Chief Secretary for Ireland had exerted himself to loosen the strings of the Treasury purse; but it was reported that he had experienced considerable difficulty in overcoming the economic disposition of that Department in dealing with the subject. He believed, however, that it would be universally admitted by the Irish Representatives that in the case of the Irish Fisheries the British Administration of Ireland had been altogether too economical; and the result had been, as generally happened when economy was pushed too far, that administrative miserliness had led to a greater outlay of public money and a waste of the public resources in the long run. On many miles of the Irish coast line, where there was now a starving population which would soon engage more completely the attention of the Government, there might have been a comfortable people but for the unstatesman like parsimony of which he complained. The Irish Fisheries were being allowed to tumble in all directions to decay. He did not exactly know whether the Board of Works were the principal delinquents in the matter, although it was, no doubt, the habit in Ireland to lay similar offences to the charge of that body. But while he thought that one branch of British Administration deserved its own share of blame, he was disposed to regard the head-quarters of that Administration, which was the political parent of so many evils, as being still more open to censure. But be that as it might, the Fishery piers in Ireland required wholesale repair, while at least 100 localities stood in need of new piers. As to the policy which had caused the Irish Fisheries to be neglected, no one, he felt sure, would denounce it more strongly than the permanent officials of the Treasury Board. They were well aware that the supervision necessary to enable the fishermen to conduct their business in the most profitable way was entirely wanting, especially on the West and South Coasts of Ireland. He himself, as Member for Dungarvan, had occasion not long ago to complain of the deplorable results to the fishermen in the neighbourhood of that town, which had been occasioned by the state of things to which he had called the attention of the Committee; and the Treasury, upon inquiry, found, to their surprise, that no means of supervision were provided, or of giving effect to the ordinary bye-laws which had been laid down by the Fishery Board. The same story was told by the fishermen of Youghal and Kinsale, and, indeed, he believed by those of every other part of the country. It was all very well, ho might add, to talk about the evils of protection; but there was a great difference, he could not help thinking, between it and that wise encouragement which a patriotic Government owed to those industries, which only required to be fairly aided and protected in order to become great industries and sources of wealth and comfort to large populations. He had risen for the purpose of impressing- on the mind of the right hon. Gentleman opposite (Mr. W. E. Forster), who, since his accession to Office, had shown so good a disposition towards Ireland, those two points—the expediency, if possible, of utilizing the enormous business organizations both of the Mansion House Fund Committee and any other Relief Committees which might be disposed to work hand-in-hand with the Government. There was not, he believed, a public body in Ireland who would not cordially respond to any offer which might be made by the Government, provided only that they displayed a due apprehension of what was demanded by the situation. The second point which he wished to impress on the right hon. Gentleman was the necessity of bringing the influence which he possessed more and more to bear on the Treasury officials for the purpose of inducing them to extend a liberal and generous encouragement to the Fisheries of Ireland.

said, he wished, before the Vote was agreed to, to put to the right hon. Gentleman (Mr. W. E. Forster) one or two questions, in the hope of eliciting what were his views on a very important and interesting subject. For his own part, he was very much indebted to the right hon. Gentleman for the trouble which he had taken in explaining to the Committee the position of affairs in Ireland, and the evident anxiety which he had shown to cope, as far as lay in his power, with the very difficult state of things which had been left to him as a damnosa hereditas by his Predecessors in Office. Having heard what was the plan of the right hon. Gentleman, he was prepared to suggest one of his own which would, he thought, perhaps go further in the direction of relieving the distress in Ireland immediately than almost any other which could be proposed, and which had never yet been tried in any attempts which had been made to meet the spread of famine in that country. The right hon. Gentleman had clearly shown that it was useless to expect that the money which was lent to the landlords in Ireland could be applied with sufficient rapidity effectually to relieve the distress which prevailed, and had stated that the only means of assistance to which recourse could be had was out-door relief, with the exception of charity. Now, by the Act of last Session, the Guardians of the Poor were empowered to borrow from the Local Government Board sums of money for the purposes of relief at the annual rate of 3½ per cent interest. The money so raised would be used for out-door relief—a most unsatisfactory mode of employing it, as everybody would admit, and if it could possibly be avoided a great object would be gained. What, in the circumstances, he would suggest was that the Government should give power to the Poor Law Boards, when application was made to them for out-door relief by able-bodied labourers who could work, to lend money to the occupiers of land in Ireland, provided that money was expended in giving employment to able-bodied applicants for out-door relief. He did not, of course, pretend to shape the scheme completely, or to indicate too precisely the details of the mode in which it should be carried into effect. But that it could be satisfactorily carried into effect he had very little doubt, and with the result that the money which was now spent on out-door relief would be expended in improving the internal resources of Ireland in a very marked degree, and in away which was very much needed. Nearly every occupier in that country had in his possession bits of land attached to his holding which, for instance, required to be drained, while there was often on his farm an entire absence of necessary buildings. As matters now stood, the landlord had no sufficient inducement to put himself to the trouble of borrowing money for the purpose of making those improvements; but if the money which it was proposed to use for the purpose of out-door relief were advanced to the occupier of land on the same terms as it was lent to the landlord, provided that the occupier consented to repay it to the Boards of Guardians in instalments as they became due, a great amount of good might be done. The instalments, he might add, could be secured on the rates of the whole electoral division; but before a rate was levied on the whole of the district, the Board of Guardians would, if his proposal were adopted, be entitled to obtain in the shape of a rate repayment from the occupier of the land of the money which they had lent to him. To such a proposal he could see no valid objection, for the repayment of the loan, instead of being rendered more unlikely, would be more likely than at present, because he money would be used for the purposes of improvement, instead of being, to a great extent, thrown away in providing outdoor relief. The security of the State would not, under the operation of such a scheme, be diminished in the slightest degree, because it would still have the security of the rateable property in the different Unions; while the experiment would, he contended, be productive, in all probability, of great advantage to the occupiers of land in Ireland. It might be urged as an objection to the plan that the whole of the rate ought not to be thrown on the tenant, and on that point his mind was not entirely made up; but, so far as he had been able to examine it, it did not appear to him that there would be any hardship in placing the whole of the rate for the improvement of a tenant's holding by himself upon that tenant; because, under the Land Act of 1870, the very fact of his having borrowed money from the Poor Law Boards to make improvements would be evidence of title to him, and would prevent the landlord from being able to confiscate his property in those improvements at any future time. If the Local Government Board would at once issue an Order giving effect to his suggestion, trusting to Parliament to indemnify them afterwards, the result, in his opinion, would be that a great deal of money which it was now proposed to spend uselessly on out-door relief—in a way which was most humiliating and demoralizing—would be expended in giving useful employment which would be productive of great ultimate advantage to the country.

said, it was rather difficult for him to give a detailed answer to the remarks which had been made by the hon. Gentleman who had just sat down (Mr. Parnell); but he could assure him that the suggestion which he had made should receive from him the most careful consideration. He was, however, afraid 1hat there would be no time to give it effect; for the great pressure of the distress would, he hoped, be over before the experiment could be fairly tried. The 1st of June had all but arrived, and the accounts which he received from Ireland led him to hope that there would be not only a good but an unusually early potato harvest. He could not, of course, say what might happen; but, if there should he again a bad harvest, he could honestly assure the hon. Gentleman that he would be prepared thoroughly to consider his suggestion, although he much doubted, taking into account the shortness of the time for carrying it into effect, whether it would be of any great practical value. In reply to the hon. Member for Dungarvan (Mr. O'Donnell), who desired to see the Local Government Board in Ireland make use of the organization of the Mansion House Fund Committee and the other Relief Committees, he had to state that when in Dublin he had received a deputation from the Mansion House Committee, and that, at the suggestion of the officers of the Local Government Board, he had expressed their wish to be on terms of the closest communication with the various committees, and it was especially suggested that relief out of charitable funds should be given to poor tenants who might feel a great reluctance to apply for out-door relief. He mentioned that merely to show that the Local Government Board were really willing and anxious to keep up those committees, and he believed it would continue to do so. The hon. Gentleman had also made some observations with respect to Fishery piers, and it was quite true that some of those piers were out of repair; but for that the counties were responsible, for the piers were handed over to their charge as well as the bridges. The Government were quite aware, however, how great an evil it was not to have those piers repaired, and they would try to provide some practical remedy for the state of things of which the hon. Gentleman complained. In the Bill which would soon be introduced a clause dealing with the subject would be found. In answer to the hon. and learned Member for the county of Limerick (Mr. O'Shaughnessy), he might observe that he was exceedingly anxious that all the applications which were sanctioned by the baronial sessions should be proceeded with as soon as possible.

pointed out that the question relative to the Irish Fishery piers had been considered last Session at a meeting of the Irish Party, and had been brought under the notice of the House by the hon. Member for Cork, on which occasion occurred a phenomenon with which former Irish Members were by no means unfamiliar. They were thoroughly beaten, and he found that the right hon. Gentlemen who now occupied the Treasury Bench had voted against them. [Mr. W. E. FORSTER: I did not.] He was glad to hear that the right hon. Gentleman had not voted against them; but he was bound to say that the present occupants of the Treasury Bench almost invariably joined the late Government in opposing the wishes of the Irish Members as to the mode of relieving the distress of Ireland.

urged upon the Government the expediency of providing means by which the money which was advanced to the landlords in Ireland should be spent in a way which would be likely to be permanently beneficial to the country.

wished to point out an instance which seemed to show the manner in which the recommendations of the Public Accounts Committee were invariably set aside. He referred to the case of the Private Secretary to the right hon. Gentleman the Chief Secretary for Ireland, who, besides receiving a salary of £300 a-year in that capacity, as well as his salary as a second-class clerk in the Colonial Office in London, drew a further allowance of £120 a-year on account of the expense to which he was put by being obliged to live in London and Lublin alternately. Unfortunately, the Public Accounts Committee were not yet in a position to report to the House with regard to details of that kind; and it was, therefore, impossible to say whether anything had been done to obviate the objections which had been taken last year to the charges under the Vote.

said, his Private Secretary had no place in the Colonial Office. He was a gentleman of great experience in the Irish Office.

pointed out that under the Vote a grant was given in aid of schoolmasters and schoolmistresses in workhouses, and asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland, whether he would take into his consideration the expediency of extending similar assistance to the schoolmasters and schoolmistresses in industrial schools, who, being deprived of the result fees which were given in every other class of school under the control of the National Board of Education were, he said, miserably underpaid?

understood the hon. Member for Galway had said that in December, 1878, the late Chief Secretary for Ireland had said that a sketch for the re-organization of the Board of Works in Ireland was then under the consideration of the Treasury. He wished to ask the present Chief Secretary for Ireland why the scheme had not been carried out?

said, if he was not mistaken, his hon. Friend opposite the Member for West Essex (Sir Henry Selwin-Ibbetson) had been on the point of introducing a Bill on that subject during the last Parliament. He assured the hon. Member that the subject had occupied his attention from the first time of his entering upon Office; but it was perfectly impossible that during the short period that had elapsed the Government could have dealt with the matter in any effectual manner. He hoped they would be shortly able to state their plans with regard to the re-organization of the Office m question.

said, that in the present state of Ireland the question of facilitating the grant of loans by the Board of Works was of too much importance to admit of delay. If the Department was effectually worked, and the mode of obtaining loans simplified, the distress which unfortunately now so widely prevailed would have been relieved. In many places landowners and others were deterred from availing themselves of the powers Parliament intended to vest in the Board in consequence of the great delay and expense incident to their applications. The grievance was one of long standing. So far back as 1871, as the hon. Member for Galway had reminded the House more than once, a Committee had reported against the Irish Board of Works. That Report, however, had been treated with thorough neglect. The late Government had thought fit to appoint a Departmental Commission which, two years ago, reported fully to the House; but no effect had been given to their recommendations or suggestions. More than once complaint had been made by the hon. Member for Galway, who sat as a Member of the Departmental Committee, and more than a year ago, in an elaborate speech, which would be found in Hansard, called the attention of the House to the utter breakdown of the system under which public works were conducted and loans given by the Board. Fair promises were then made; but nothing had been done. Under these circumstances, he trusted the Government would now give something more in the way of explanation than the stereotyped answer that they had not time to take the matter into consideration. This was a grievance which, although it had remained up to the present time unredressed, had been deeply felt in Ireland. He held that if the Board of Works had been in working order a large amount of the distress which now existed would have been obviated. It was a misapprehension to imagine it was alone on the seaboard or West of Ireland that distress prevailed. It had been severely felt throughout the whole of Ireland, and had the Board been in order a great deal of the suffering in the inland counties would have been remedied by the making of loans, and the consequent stimulation of industry. On such an important matter, he did not think that the Irish Members should be contented with a mere statement that the subject was under consideration; and he trusted that they might have some farther intimation, either from the Secretary to the Treasury or from the Chief Secretary for Ireland, explaining the views which the Government entertained upon the subject; otherwise, he should be obliged to move the reduction of the Vote.

admitted that the hon. Member had fairly stated the case with regard to that Department; and he was prepared to say that the late Government would have been seriously to blame if, after the promises made, they had not brought the subject before the House, as they eon-templated doing. But he did not think that the hon. Member was right in saying that the present Government had had time to consider the question, looking at the rerent change which had taken place; and he reminded the Committee that the subject had been, moreover, very seriously complicated by the fact that at the time when the late Government contemplated a re-organization of the Board the question of dealing with the loans under the new Bill came into operation. Under those circumstances, they were unable to disturb the then existing machinery, upon which they had to rely at a time of great emergency. He believed hon. Members would admit that he had intended to submit to the House, if possible, a Bill which would carry out the recommendations of the Departmental Committee; and he admitted that it would have been a great advantage if the House possessed a more direct contact with the work of the Board of Works, in the shape of someone who could speak for its action. He had merely shadowed forth what was really an additional difficulty in effecting a change of that kind; but even had they been in continuous Office they would have hesitated to disturb the only machinery upon which they could rely for dealing with the questions arising in consequence of the distress in Ireland. He appealed to the Committee to believe that, whatever had been the intentions of the late Government, if the present Government proposed next Session to alter the Board, he should be pleased to do everything he could to assist in carrying out alterations which he believed to be necessary, not as the result of any maladministration, but because the Board had work thrust upon them at a time when their staff was insufficient, and consequently paralyzed their actions.

said, he thought it desirable that a Return should be presented of all the works passed by the baronial sessions in Galway, both those contracted for, and those in progress, as well as those refused to be passed by the Board of Works, in order that they might know what works were being-executed.

said, he fully intended to make a fresh Return as speedily as possible of the condition in which the land, sanitary, and baronial loans were, as well as what had been applied for, and what had been sanctioned. He did not know, however, that he could give, in every case, the grounds on which each application was refused or accepted. As regarded what had been said by the hon. Member for Kilkenny (Mr. Martin), he thought the hon. Member would see that it was only an honest reply to say that the Government would consider the matter. The hon. Member had asked for his views upon that difficult subject, and had received them. During the two or three weeks in which they had held Office, the Government had had to consider, almost hourly, the actual measures to be taken for immediate necessities; and, under those circumstances, it would not have been possible to go into the best mode of re-organizing the Office of the Board of Works in Ireland. Their position was that, like many manufacturers, though they possessed machinery which a good many people said ought to be changed, they had also a very heavy order book, and could not find the time to complete the orders before them.

said, he wished to point out one of the many anomalies which abounded in Ireland in matters under the care of the Board of Works. On page 156 he observed that the architect received a salary of £300 per annum; but in addition to that sum, he found, by a foot-note, that he also received a pension of £300 per annum from the Irish Poor Law Board. He ventured to think that if the officer in question was a pensioner of the Poor Law Board he must be a somewhat worthless fellow; but, at any rate, he thought that if he was pensioned by one body he ought not to be the servant of another. Therefore, he must object to the Vote, unless some satisfactory promise was given that this pensioner should not appear as the architect for the Board of Works next year.

said, he wished to remind the Committee that this Vote had been discussed for many years, and that the hon. Baronet the Member for West Essex (Sir Henry Selwin-Ibbetson) had said that the Office ought to be reformed and put into a better condition than it was at present. He had also said that the Office was in a bad state as regarded its machinery. It was, therefore, very painful that this state of things should continue from year to year, and that nothing should be done to remedy it.

said, under the circumstances to which he had referred, he begged to move that the Vote be reduced by the sum of £300.

said, without being able to speak from, full information, it was his impression that the Poor Law Board had not an architect in their employment, and that the item objected to by the hon. Member was for the pension given to him upon his retirement. There was not the smallest reason for supposing that the gentleman referred to was incompetent.

said, that after the explanation of the noble Lord he begged leave to withdraw his Amendment.

said, he found that the Estimates were full of such anomalies as he had already alluded to, and to which he again felt it his duty to call the attention of the Committee. Ho had given way upon the last Vote; but he could not do so in the present instance, unless he received some definite promise that they would be done away with. He found that the salary of the Keeper of State Papers in Ireland was £500 per annum, and, as he perceived by the foot-note, he also received £750 per annum as Ulster King of Arms from the Vote for the Household of the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland. Many of these offices were of an anomalous character in the administration of Irish affairs; and he, therefore, moved that the Vote be reduced by the sum of £500.

said, he believed that the Vote represented a not inadequate remuneration for the valuable services rendered by the officer in charge of the State Papers, which had been placed in the most admirable order, and formed a series of the most important and valuable records of Irish administration. The amount of work involved in the care, examination, and comparison of those Papers in connection with official purposes, as well as for the public use. was very great; and he was quite satisfied that if the hon. Member could visit the office in Dublin he would be surprised to find how large a number of Papers were now classified and made available for public purposes. There was no Department in Ireland which could more thoroughly satisfy the national aspirations and those of all true Irishmen than that important series of Papers, which had been brought into a state of perfect order and arrangement from one of absolute ruin. They were of the greatest value to the future history of Ireland, and to abolish the office would be an act which the hon. Member would himself deeply regret. He did not think it necessary to impress further upon the Committee the importance of this office, and would do no more than express a hope that the hon. Member would withdraw his Motion for the reduction of the Vote.

said, he had some knowledge of the office in question, and could quite confirm all the hon. Member (Dr. Lyons) had said with regard to the condition and importance of the State Papers, which he regarded as an invaluable record of national history, and ho only wished that every other Department in the Government of Ireland was in the same satisfactory condition. But when he considered this Vote he saw that there was also a Deputy Keeper who received £800 per annum, as well as an Assistant Deputy Keeper with a salary of £584. Again, there was the Ulster King of Arms and other relics of feudalism, for which he objected to pay. He did not know what was meant by the King of Arms, although he was aware that if he went to Ireland he would not be allowed to bear arms at all. However, he thought that the sooner they got rid of all that paraphernalia, and all the other devices for imposing upon the credulity of the unfortunate people, the better it would be for Ireland and for this country.

thought it was all very well to cut down salaries where there was any real grievance to be redressed; but, in the present instance, that was not the case, and if the hon. Member went to a division he should feel it is duty to vote against the Amendment.

said, that Sir Bernard Burke held a patent office, to which he had been appointed in 1857, and that if it were abolished he must receive compensation. Under the present arrangement he had abandoned the fees, and that transaction was very profitable to the Exchequer. He believed that the office would be abolished at the next vacancy.

said, that although he could not admit that the apology offered by the Government was any justification of the anomalies to which he had referred he would ask permission to withdraw his Motion.

asked if he was right in understanding the noble Lord to say that on the occasion of the next vacancy the office of Ulster King of Arms would be abolished.

said, that he had been rightly understood by the noble Lord.

said, he wished to continue the question annually raised by the present Financial Secretary to the Treasury, and now to ask the noble Lord the Secretary to the Treasury as to what progress the Treasury had made in reforming the Legal Department? The noble Lord had very justly called attention to the fact that, in 1873, a Select Committee entered upon an inquiry into the whole subject; and he (Sir George Balfour) should very much like to know what steps had been taken to act upon their recommendations? That Committee had strongly recommended a thorough reform in the Legal Departments of the country, and the noble Lord had all along advocated the reform as one likely to benefit the country, not only with regard to the business of the country, but also in effecting considerable economies in these Departments. He might also mention that only so far back as 1877 Class III. of the Estimates, containing the Law Charges, had advanced from under £5,000,000 to £6,000,000. No doubt, a portion of the increase could be accounted for; but he could not fail to observe that a very considerable increase had taken place in the actual outlay of Departments which could not be reconciled. He, therefore, had to ask whether any progress had been made during the present year, or during the Recess, towards carrying forward the Bill of the Lord Chancellor, which the late Secretary to the Treasury had promised should be brought in? He would suggest that the Report of the Departmental Committee, which the Treasury had assembled to inquire into the Public Legal Departments, with a view of carrying out the recommendations of the Select Committee of 1873, should be laid before the House for consideration. As regarded the general expenditure of the Departments under Class III., it was infinitely worse managed than either that of the Army or the Navy. In fact, it was prominent among all the badly managed Departments of the Public Service for wasteful, uncontrolled extravagance.

said, that if the hon. and gallant Gen- tleman would refer to Vote 5 of that Class he would find that the basis of a most valuable reform had been laid last year. Under the operation of the Supreme Court of Judicature Act, all the various Legal Departments of the Government were amalgamated. He believed that no less than nine different offices were brought into one, the result of which would be seen in Vote 5. The reduction made up to the present time, of course, was not large, because the officers who were transferred to the new central Office of the Supreme Court of Judicature had to continue at the old rate of salary; and, therefore, the economies and improvements which would take place, as vested interests died out, could not at once be enforced. He thought that the question was one which had better be discussed when they came to Vote 5, when the hon. and gallant Gentleman would see that the basis of a very important improvement had been laid.

said, that he had a question, and a very simple question, to ask of the Law Officers of the Crown. He noticed that the hon. and learned Attorney General received for non-contentious business £7,000. The hon. and learned Solicitor General, in regard to business of a similar kind, received £6,000. The Law Officer who advised the Foreign Office was put down at a salary of £2,000. He wished the Committee to note that the Law Officers of the Crown were also paid by fees for contentious business according to the usual way. Now, it appeared to him that that was a new method of putting the matter. He should like to know what the non-contentious duties were, for the sum which was put down was a very large one.

said, it would take so long to tell the hon Member what the non-contentious business was, that he was afraid he should fail in the attempt to do so; but he could tell him that it was enough to keep any one individual engaged for all his time without attending to any contentious business at all. First, the Attorney General had to attend to all the charities of the country, and all the patents of the country; to the legal matters connected with all the Departments of the country; to advise the Foreign Office upon every matter of importance that came before it; and to draw up all the Orders in Council that came before the Privy Council. His hon. Friend would, perhaps, excuse him continuing the list; and he could assure him that if he would assist the Attorney General in performing the non-contentious business of the country the Attorney General would be most grateful to him for it.

said, with reference to the Attorney General's duties in connection with the Patent Office, that at one time he used to be paid by fees drawn from the receipts of the Patent Office, and he was very glad to find these fees done away with, and the whole salary fixed, irrespective of fees for contentious business. If it would take too long to explain what was the non-contentious business, they, at all events, could be informed of the amount paid to the Attorney General and the other Law Officers of the Crown for contentious business. An estimate of the probable amount to be paid to each of them should be laid before Parliament, drawn from the records of actual expenditure of former years, and they ought to have the same full information given with regard to all the small men in the Government employ connected with law affairs whose estimated receipts were more fully detailed because they had not the power of the Attorney General and the Solicitor General. In other branches of the Revenue Department they found all payments recorded, even down to £10, £20, and £30. He should like to see the same thing done with regard to the fees paid to so many persons connected with the Law Department of England, and not only England, but of Scotland and of Ireland.

said, he did not wish to be supposed to make any promise that that information should be absolutely forthcoming, and for the reason that he did not quite see how they were to obtain it. He did not know what his hon. and learned Friends near him would have to do in the way of contentious business. The sum would depend entirely upon the amount of business done, and the rate at which the briefs were marked.

said, that he had to ask, with reference to the sum of £2,000 for Legal Advice to the Foreign Office, Whether the noble Lord was aware that there was already an Assistant Legal Under Secretary to the Foreign Office; and, if so, what were the reasons for asking for this Vote of £2.000?

said, that some years ago there was an office at the Foreign Office which was called that of the Queen's Advocate. When that office was abolished it was thought necessary that there should be a permanent legal officer attached to the Foreign Office, and the learned gentleman who had hitherto occupied that office had done so for a number of years, and, he might say, very much to the benefit of the Public Service.

said, that it appeared to him to be impossible to make a Return as to the contentious business; and, therefore, it was useless to ask for further explanation. He thought he might say that one of the best alterations which had been made in the relations of the Law Officers to the Crown was that which remunerated the Attorney General and the Solicitor General by salary instead of fees, because, whenever any great reforms were suggested in the Patent Office, the large emoluments which were payable to the Law Officers were always obstacles in the way of such reforms. He did not consider the remuneration of the Law Officers as being by any means too large.

said, that as one who was no lawyer he considered that whatever officers of the Crown were overpaid they were certainly not the Law Officers. They had a very serious work to do in watching to prevent the House of Commons from making mistakes in its Acts of Parliament; and for himself he would sooner cut down the salaries of any of the officers of the Crown than that of those who, by their legal talent and ability alone, had raised themselves to that position on whichever side of the House they sat.

asked whether they were to understand, as regarded the item of £2,000 for Counsel to the Foreign Office, that that item would cease as soon as the present holder of the office ceased to occupy it.

said, that these Estimates were prepared by the late Government; but he might say that when the gentleman who at the present filled the post in question ceased to occupy it new ar- rangements would be made in respect to it.

said, that on these occasions it was customary to make remarks upon smaller gentlemen than the Law Officers of the Crown; but he wished to point out that though the Law Officers had a great deal of responsibility, and did their work exceedingly well, the Judges said very different things about the work of the House. They said that the House did its work exceedingly badly. Now, though the present Law Officers, as well as the late Law Officers, were very able men, nevertheless £7,000 for non-contentious business was a very large sum. The Prime Minister only got £5,000, and the principal Secretaries of State only got £5,000, and yet they filled very responsible Offices, and had a great deal of work to perform. Now, the Law Officers were constantly at business from morning to night. He found they were constantly engaged in the Courts of Law, which must occupy their time very much. He thought it would be quite as well if their salary were reduced in the same way as every thing else.

said, he should like to know what were the exact functions of the Law Officers with regard to framing Acts of Parliament?

said, that his contention was that if the Secretary to the Treasury could not say exactly what sums would be paid to the Law Officers for contentious business during the course of this year, still he might be able to give an approximate estimate of the sum from the known expenditure of past years. He maintained that if they could not have these details with the Estimates, they ought to have an exact statement made in the audit of the Expenditure of the country, and taken from the vouchers signed by the Law Officers, specifying the services for which the moneys were paid. Not a fraction could be paid away without the knowledge of the Auditor General, and there would be every facility then for ascertaining this amount. He hoped that in a few years they would have all that done, and that the noble Lord the Secretary to the Treasury would be the person to initiate these great improvements.

said, he could not help thinking they were engaged in a somewhat unworthy discussion. The matter they had really to consider was how the Crown could best be served, and how the highest legal ability could be obtained. That could not be done without adequate pay. When the arrangements for obtaining these services were made the remuneration had to be considered not only with regard to the office itself, but also with regard to those who filled it; and when the commutation was made of the fees that were ordinarily paid, he believed that the Government had not only made a good bargain for themselves, but had also dealt very fairly by the officers who were concerned.

said, that it was not the duty of the Law Officers of the Crown to go into the construction of every Act of Parliament that was passed by the House. He could assure the Committee that if any more duty was cast upon the Law Officers of the Crown than existed at present it would be impossible to per for in these duties with benefit to the Public Service.

inquired where the Public Prosecutor was now lodged; because, unless he was incorrectly informed, that official had been lodged in such an unhealthy office that he had been laid up with typhoid fever, as well as one of his assistants?

said, he did not think the case was quite so bad as it had been represented by the hon. Baronet; but still there were sanitary defects in the Office, and another more suitable place had been provided.

said, that the increase in this Estimate was chiefly caused by the repayments to Sheriffs of Sheriffs' expenses, in consequence of four Assizes being held every year in the Assize counties. He should like to know whether it was the intention of the Government to continue the practice of holding four Assizes instead of three, as for- merly? He held that the experiment had not been very successful, and certainly in many of the counties the burden thrown upon jurors who had to attend the Assize town four times a-year for the sake of a single prisoner, who otherwise would have had to stay a month longer in prison, was very great indeed. He should be glad to know if there was any intention to re-consider the question of reducing the number of Assizes?

said, that the change was made by the late Secretary of State for the Home Department; and, so far as the present intentions of the Government went, they did not propose to interfere with the arrangement. In course of time it might be found not to work well, and the Government might then possibly be willing to re-consider the question.

said, he was very sorry to hear the answer given by his hon. and learned Friend the Attorney General. In some cases these small Assizes were wholly unnecessary. In the county which he had the honour to represent, the Judges and the juries concurred in the representation to that effect to the authorities; but they had not heard any result of it. Anyone who would take the trouble to look into the matter would find by the Returns that at some Assizes on the Midland Circuit there were too few Judges, while there were hardly any to per for in the judicial duties in London. All this judicial strength was sent away to the country, for the purpose of trying two or three cases which might have been tried at the Sessions, and he thought the matter demanded the very serious attention of the Government. He was very disappointed to hear the answer given by the Government, and he hoped that it would be re-considered. He wished also to call attention to the ridiculous custom of putting so much expense upon the Sheriffs. It seemed to him to be questionable whether Sheriffs in these clays were required at all, or whether they were not an anomaly and a mere relic of past times. The duty of the Sheriff was now reduced almost entirely to putting on a Court dress, and driving to a railway station, and there waiting about to receive the Judges. It was by no means a right thing to compel country gentlemen to make themselves ridiculous in this manner, and also to put them to the expense attendant upon it. In consequence of the number of these Assizes having been increased, the office of Sheriff could not now be performed without an expense very often of over £700. He did not think it was right to call upon gentlemen to perform duties which involved such an unreasonable expense as this. By the last Prisons Act the duties of sheriffs in prisons were abolished with one exception, and that was, that the superintendence of executions was still in their hands. He thought that that one duty of the Sheriff might now very well be left to the Chief Constable of the county, or the head gaoler, or some other officer of the Government. He trusted that the Government would take this matter into consideration, for the office of Sheriff was now extremely unpopular, and it was a very undignified thing to see a respectable country gentleman in thin silk stockings standing about for hours at a railway station wailing for Judges who very frequently treated him with but scant courtesy. He sincerely hoped that the Government would see their way to the abolition of this obsolete office.

said, that there were very great inconveniences arising under the present system; and if the office of Sheriff was to be preserved some modification of the duties which he had to perform should be made. He rose for the purpose of stating that his light hon. Friend the late Secretary of State for the Home Department, who first initiated the system of four Assizes in the year, did so at the almost unanimous request of the House of Commons. The attention of the House was called, in several cases, to the system by which prisoners were frequently kept in prison waiting for trial for long periods, and it was the general and unanimous wish of the House that such a thing should not be allowed to occur again, and for that reason four Assizes were instituted. No doubt, many inconveniences had been caused by these four Assizes in the strain placed upon the juries in counties and by the demand upon judicial time. But he thought that further consideration on the subject might lead to the institution of some method by which prisoners should be tried without the present in- conveniences—perhaps the Judges might sit at the Quarter Sessions occasionally to hear Assize cases. At all events, this matter might be considered, and he would wish to remind the Committee that the Winter Assize Act was passed at the nearly unanimous desire of the House for the purpose of preventing prisoners remaining in prison for a long period.

said, that in the last Parliament he had moved for a Return showing the number of prisoners tried at the Autumn and Winter Assizes in 1879–80. That Return had only recently been placed in their hands, and they had not yet had time to consider it fully. He might say, however, that it included not only the two Winter Assizes, but also the Quarter Sessions in the winter. There were 1.G00 prisoners to be tried at Quarter Sessions, and they required the presence of 2,000 jurymen to try them. Out of that number, 700 prisoners came from five divisions. That left 53divisions in which there were only 900 prisoners, who thus required as many as 1,600 or 1,700 jurymen to try them. He hoped that the Committee would agree with him that it was a great hardship that jurymen should be brought at an inclement season of the year to try prisoners when their presence was really not necessary. The fact was produced by holding the present large number of Assizes. It appeared that at the Autumn Assizes there were 28 counties in England, not taking Wales into the calculation, in which there were less than 10 prisoners to be tried. The natural conclusion was that it was a serious waste of the time of the Judges, and of all connected with the administration of justice, that in so many cases special Assizes should be held for the purposes of trying 2, 3, 4, 5, or 9 prisoners. There was also an injustice on the jury, and especially on the Grand Jurymen. The Grand Jury of the county of Cambridge made a presentment to the Judges, in which was set forth the great hardship they were put to, and the waste of time that took place in consequence of their being called together to try cases, many of which might have been taken at the Quarter Sessions.

said, that he fully agreed with the observation that it was at the almost unanimous wish of the House that the late Government provided for the holding of four Assizes, and he considered they were perfectly justified in what they did. It was felt to be a hardship that some prisoners should be kept in prison for a length of time without an opportunity of trial; while, in many cases, the persons who were so detained in prison were after trial discharged. That was a state of things which led to a desire on the part of Parliament to find a remedy. In finding a remedy, however, they had, perhaps, gone a little too far. They had tried to meet what was a hardship, and they might possibly have given rise to inconveniences and expenses and other disadvantages which it was desirable to avoid; but they could hardly form a correct opinion until experience had been gained of the working of the additional Assizes. He hoped Her Majesty's present Advisers would promise to take these matters into consideration, and to strike out some means whereby prisoners should not be detained an undue length of time without trial, and, at the same time, that too many Assizes should not be held. He agreed in hoping most sincerely that Her Majesty's Government would take into its consideration the question of the High Sheriff. He entertained a strong opinion that it was extremely undesirable to have an office which from the progress of time had become ridiculous, and was inconsistent with the present state of society. It was well known that Gentlemen were extremely anxious to avoid taking this office, for they knew that it was a mere farce, and an expensive one to them. In some cases it led to their being insulted by the Judges, who imposed penalties upon respectable country gentlemen because they did not act towards them as they wished. He hoped that Her Majesty's Government would prevent gentlemen from being treated by irascible Judges in the way which now frequently happened. In his opinion, the time had come to seriously consider this question.

said, that the question of these frequent Assizes seemed to have been overlooked by the Law Officers of the Crown, although very decided opinions were expressed about them in different parts of the Committee. He did not intend to discuss the question how far Parliament was justified in going the length that it did in ordering four Assizes for the purpose of trying a few hundred prisoners. They knew very well that the chances of acquittal of the prisoner were not more than two in five, and it was considered that of those acquitted hardly one in nine was really innocent. But, however that might be, there was a wave of sentiment which came over the country and took everything before it. Everyone, even the Government, yielded to that wave of sentiment, and everyone—Judges, juries, and all concerned in the administration of justice—were sacrificed to that wave of sentiment. Now they had to deal with the result. The condition of the Sheriff was bad enough; but it was not merely the inconveniences of the Judges — though their sufferings were bad enough—but it was that the state of business should be so impeded in London as it was at the present time. The combined effect of this wave of sentiment and of the action of the Judicature Acts had been such that at the last Sitting in January 625 cases were waiting for trial, and the Judges were dispersed about the country with only 65 cases to try. Now the state of things was found to be worse, for Her Majesty's Judges were being withdrawn from their ordinary work for the purpose of trying Election Petitions. He thought it was a matter for serious consideration whether the Judges, when most required in London, ought to be sent off for about six weeks to try a very small number of cases in the country.

said, that on two or three occasions during the last Parliament cases had occurred in which Englishmen had been kept in foreign countries waiting for trial for long periods. When remonstrances were addressed to the foreign authorities the answers invariably were that it was the consequence of the peculiar arrangement of the municipal law of those countries, which would not admit of a more speedy trial. But when attention was thus called to the hardship of keeping men waiting a long time in prison without trial, our own municipal law came under consideration. It was found that in this country a man might lie in gaol many weeks and even months without trial. There was something in that which spoke to the conscience; and the right hon. Gentleman the late Secretary of State for the Home Department, to whom all honour was due, instituted the four Assizes. It seemed to him (Mr. Hopwood) that some plan might be devised by which prisoners might be brought to a speedy trial, and inconvenience be avoided. It was possible to enlarge the jurisdiction of Quarter Sessions; but there was no confidence on the part of the public in those Courts, by reason of their not being presided over by trained lawyers. That had been a matter that had always been resisted, and until it was agreed upon he could not see how the House could ever extend the jurisdiction of the Sessions. And yet until it was done it would be almost impossible to reduce the number of prisoners which would remain to be tried by the Judges at the Assizes. Probably, some day or other, the House would have to settle this question; but if they ever did extend the jurisdiction of the Sessions, it would be absolutely necessary to place upon the Sessions responsible officers. It was impossible to trust Sessions with greater cases than at present, until their duties were carried out by trained lawyers. He hoped that the present short discussion might draw the attention of Her Majesty's Government to this subject, as well as to the general question of Sheriffs. Some hon. Members had called attention to the present state of the duties of the office, and had suggested its abolition. In his opinion, the Sheriff was undoubtedly a necessary officer, and he should not agree with the observations which had been made with regard to the office having become obsolete. Doubtless, some inconvenience was entailed upon gentlemen by having to accept this office; but, as it was an office which was necessary to the well-being of the State, he thought that some sacrifice might fairly be asked on its account.

said, he hoped that the Government might see their way to abolish the office of Sheriff. At present, having to take the office was a great hardship to country gentlemen, and very heavy expenses were entailed upon them, and those expenses had become heavier in proportion to their income. The only duty now left to the Sheriff was that, in the last resource, if they could get no one else to hang the prisoners, they were obliged to do it themselves. If the office of Sheriff were to be abolished, it would be necessary to find some other person to charge with that duty. He should have thought that there would be no difficulty in finding some person to charge with that duty; and he should suggest, in default of anyone better, that it should devolve on the Secretary of State for the Home Department.

said, that, in his opinion, Her Majesty's Government should hesitate long before it abolished the office of Sheriff. It was a very old office, for it took its rise in the time of Nebuchadnezzar. He had been Sheriff himself. If he had had to pay only £500 or £600, as the hon. Member for Bedford (Mr. Magniac) had stated, he should have considered that very cheap for the honour that he derived from the office. In London he found that there was great competition for this office, for it was a dignified thing to represent Her Majesty in a Court of Law. He did not think that when they had so much business to do in town Her Majesty's Judges ought to be sent to the country to try two or three prisoners. It seemed to him that judicial power could be very much more economized than it was at present; prisoners might be gathered together, and things might be done in a very much better way. He hoped there would be no interference with the office of Sheriff after things had been allowed to go on as they did at present for the last 500 years—in fact, from the time of Nebuchad nezzar.

said, that he wished to urge upon Her Majesty's Government, as worthy of consideration the question whether the two offices of the Circuit Court of Assize, and Clerk of the Crown, could not be assimilated.

said, that there had been a proposal to combine those offices as much as possible, by sending down to the Assize assistance from the Associates Office in London. There was, however, some difficulty in carrying out the matter, because it was usual that there should bo two Courts sitting together, the Criminal and the Civil, and a responsible officer was required in each.

said, that he hoped the noble Lord the Secretary to the Treasury would now report Progress. There was a point upon this Vote to which he wished to call the attention of the Committee, and it might lead to a considerable discussion. Under those circumstances, he thought that Progress should be reported.

said, that, under those circumstances, he had no objection to Progress being reported.

in moving that the Bill be now read the second time, said, that he would not trouble the House with many observations upon this measure; he would only say that it had met with approval on all hands in Ireland. It was not opposed by Her Majesty's Government, and it was very important that the Bill should be passed so soon as possible, as the present Act expired within two months. Under those circumstances, he trusted that the House would agree to the second reading of the Bill.

in moving that the Bill be now read the second time, said, that the Bill was, with one modification, a Bill which had last Session been introduced by the late Lord Advocate. It referred to a subject on which legislation was urgently required, and he had, therefore, entered into communication with Lord Watson to prevent the subject being dropped; and now, with his full sanction and concurrence, introduced this Bill. The measure had also obtained the qualified approval of his right hon. and learned Friend the present Lord Advocate. The question with which it dealt was one of very great importance in Scotland. He begged to propose the second reading of the Bill in order that it might be referred to a Select Committee, where the matters of detail which it dealt with could be discussed.

said, he should like to know whether the hon. Member for Glasgow (Dr. Cameron) was in Order in moving the second reading of a Bill as to which he had himself given Notice of Motion that it should be referred to a Select Committee?

said, that the Notice which the hon. Member (Dr. Cameron) had given—namety, that the Bill should be referred to a Select Committee, was not a Notice of Opposition of such a character as would prevent a Bill being taken after half-past 12 o'clock.