Skip to main content

Commons Chamber

Volume 256: debated on Tuesday 7 September 1880

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

House Of Commons

Tuesday, 7th September, 1880.

The House met at half after One of the clock.

Corrupt Practices At Elections-Gloucester City Election

Queen's Answer to Address reported, as follows:—

" I have received the joint Address of the two Souses of Parliament with reference to the Report made by the Judge selected to try a Petition in respect of the Election and Return for the City of Gloucester.

"And I have given directions accordingly for the appointment of the gentlemen named in the Address to be Commissioners for the purpose of making the inquiry prayed for."

And the same Answer, mutatis mutandis, to the several Addresses in respect of the Elections for Canterbury, Chester City, Macclesfield, Knaresborough, Boston, Oxford, and Sandwich.

Questions

Ireland—Police Protection

asked the Chief Secretary to the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, Whether he is aware that four constables of the Royal Irish Constabulary have been, for a considerable period, and are at the present time kept in continual attendance on one John Carr, a member of the Orange Society, and an employe of Colonel Cooper, Lieutenant of the County Sligo; whether the said John Carr is the same person who was tried at last Spring Assizes in Sligo on a charge of shooting a young man named Kelly, a Catholic, and who admitted on his trial that he had fired the shot which wounded Kelly; and, why, and at whose instance, this person has been attended by a suite of armed constables, and how long the Government propose to continue to employ this detachment of Constabulary in this duty; and, also, if he can give any information as to when the extra police force will be removed from districts in Sligo?

in reply, said, that the extra police force in the district of Sligo would be removed when that could be done consistently with the safety of the district. He had sent to Ireland for information with regard to the case of Carr; but it had not yet been supplied. All he could say was that he would take care that no person would receive what was called personal protection unless his life was considered in danger. If it was in danger, whoever he might be, he ought to have that protection. He would inquire into the matter; and neither in this case nor in any other should any extra Constabulary be kept longer than was necessary.

Party Processions—Home Rule Riots In Glasgow

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department, Whether it is the fact that, in connection with the riots at Glasgow on the 14th August, twenty-six Catholics and five Protestants were arrested by the Police, that at the Police Courts all the Catholics were convicted and sentenced to fine or imprisonment, and all the Protestants acquitted and discharged, while the charges against the Protestants were sworn to by the Police as positively as the charges against the Catholics; whether, in particular, it is the fact, in the case of James Findlay (Protestant) and Kennett McLennan (Protestant) the Police swore they were caught "red-handed," the former "striking freely all round in the middle of the procession," the latter violently attempting to rescue a prisoner, and yet both men, although bringing forward no exculpatory evidence whatever, were dis- charged from the bar, the magistrate finding the charges against them "not proven;" and, whether, under the circumstances, he will order a public inquiry?

I have received a further communication from the Procurator Fiscal of Glasgow in reference to this matter; and I may say there has been so much contradictory testimony that I do not think it will be of any advantage that I should enter at present upon the matter. I have, therefore, placed the matter in the hands of the Lord Advocate.

United States—Agriculture— Russian Report

asked the Under Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, Whether he has any knowledge of a Report made on the agricultural productiveness of the United States by Commissioners who were sent out to America by the Russian Government; and, if such a Report does exist, whether he would take steps to obtain a Copy, and to have it presented to Parliament?

No information respecting the Commission referred to by my hon. Friend has been received by Her Majesty's Government; but Lord Dufferin will be instructed to make inquiries and send home a copy of any Report which may have appeared on the subject.

Cutting Submarine Telegraphic Cables

asked the Under Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, Whether the attention of the Government has been called to the cutting, by the Chilian authorities, of the submarine telegraphic cables laid by the West Coast of America Telegraph Company on the coast of Peru, the neutrality of which cables had been declared; and, whether any steps have been taken to bring the matter under the notice of the Chilian Government?

The attention of Her Majesty's Government has been called to this matter by the Company, who have been requested to supply further information, on receipt of which Her Majesty's Government will consider whether they can properly make an official representation to the Chilian Government. Her Majesty's Government will inquire as to the fact of the neutrality of the cables having been declared.

Attack On The Steam Ship"Khalifet"

asked the Under Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, Whether the attention of Her Majesty's Government has been called to the reported recent attack upon the steam ship Khalifet in the Tigris; and what steps are likely to be taken in the matter?

I have already stated to the House that information has been received by Her Majesty's Government on the subject to which the Question refers. A despatch recently received from Her Majesty's Consul General at Bagdad states that a military force had been despatched by the Governor General against the Arab tribe which attacked the Khalifet, and it was hoped that the steps taken would very shortly result in the suppression of the revolt and the punishment of the guilty parties.

Poor Law—Transfer Of Pauper Lunatics From India

asked the Secretary of State for India a Question of which he had given him private Notice—namely, If he can state what course is likely to be taken with respect to the sending from India lunatics, who are landed at Portsmouth and are chargeable on the local unions?

, in reply, said, there had been a good deal of Correspondence on the subject; and the conclusion he had arrived at was to the effect that the matter was more one for the attention of the War Office than of the India Office. He would be very glad to show the hon. Member the Correspondence; and before next Session he would consider whether he would lay it on the Table.

Ireland—Armagh Lunatic Asylum

asked the Chief Secretary to the Lord Lieu- tenant of Ireland, Whether he will now produce Copies of the Petition of Mr. John Lyons with reference to the contract for supplying milk to the Armagh Lunatic Asylum, and of the Report of Dr. Nugent on the inquiry recently held by him as to illegal and fraudulent tampering with tenders in the office of the Asylum; whether he will state if any and what decision has been come to by the Government; and, whether the inquiry held by Dr. Nugent was a sworn inquiry, and steps were taken to compel the attendance of witnesses needful in the case?

, in reply, said, he had not received the Report referred to; but he would inquire into the matter.

Prorogation Of The Parliament

Message to attend The LORDS COMMISSIONERS: —

The House went;—and a Royal Commission to that purpose having been

read, the Royal Assent was given to several Bills.

And afterwards Her Majesty's Most Gracious Speech was delivered to both Houses of Parliament by the Lord High Chancellor (in pursuance of Her Majesty's Command).

Then a Commission for proroguing the Parliament was road.

After which,

THE LORD CHANCELLOR said—

My Lords, and Gentlemen,

By virtue of Her Majesty's Commission, under the Great Seal, to us and other Lords directed, and now read, we do, in Her Majesty's Name, and in obedience to Her Commands, prorogue this Parliament to Wednesday the twenty-fourth day of November next, to be then here holden; and this Parliament is accordingly prorogued to Wednesday the twenty-fourth day of November next.