Written Answers
Indian Collections (South Kensington)
asked the President of the Board of Education what steps have been taken to remedy the condition of the Indian collections at present housed in various places at South Kensington and elsewhere, as brought to his notice by the deputation which waited on him in 1909; whether he has formed any conclusions as to the best way of providing that the various scattered Indian collections should be brought together as a whole under one roof; and what steps have been taken to give effect to those conclusions?
The India collections at South Kensington have now been re-classified and re-arranged in the extended galleries that have recently been made available. It has not yet been possible to gather into one combined collection the various Indian objects in the British Museum, the India Office, and elsewhere, as any such scheme would require the provision of a new building for the purpose.
Royal Gate Of Kyoto (Kew Gardens)
asked the hon. Member for Southampton, as representing the First Commissioner of Works, whether his attention has been called to the fact that the replica of the Chokoshi More or Royal Gate of Kyoto, which was presented by the Japanese Government and which has now been erected at Kew Gardens, is showing signs of discolouration; and whether steps could be taken to place the gate in a less exposed position?
The First Commissioner is advised that the discolouration, which is very slight, is no evidence of deterioration but the result of the action of light and air upon light-coloured wood, and is a perfectly natural process of which the Board's officers are aware. No action appears to be necessary.
| Amount received from Exchequer. | Application thereof. | |||||||||||||||
| Year ended 31st March | Old Sinking Fund. | New Sinking Fund. | Total. | Description of Debt Purchased. | Amount of Debt Purchased. | Average Price. | ||||||||||
| £ | s. | d. | £ | s. | d | £ | s. | d. | £ | s. | d. | £ | s. | d. | ||
| 1902 | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||
| 1903 | — | 73,544 | 7 | 2 | 73,544 | 7 | 2 | Consols | 81,516 | 4 | 11 | 90 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1904 | — | 1,464,087 | 1 | 9 | 1,464,087 | 1 | 9 | Consols | 1,110,444 | 18 | 8 | 86 | 13 | 8 | ||
| Ex. Bonds 1904 | 500,000 | 0 | 0 | Par. | ||||||||||||
| 1905 | — | 2,237,678 | 17 | 2 | 2,237,678 | 17 | 2 | Consols | 199 | 4 | 8 | 90 | 7 | 6 | ||
| Ex. Bonds 1905 | 2,218,900 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 9 | 3 | ||||||||||
| 1906 | 1,413,907 | 5 | 10 | 3,449,337 | 10 | 8 | 4,863,244 | 16 | 6 | Trasury Bills | 1,873,728 | 16 | 1 | Par. | ||
| Deficiency Advs. | 1,413,907 | 5 | 10 | Par. | ||||||||||||
| Ex. Bonds 1905 | 568,200 | 0 | 0 | Par. | ||||||||||||
| Ex. Bonds 1907 | 4,521 | 15 | 8 | Par. | ||||||||||||
| Ex. Bonds 1906–15 | 1,000,000 | 0 | 0 | Par. | ||||||||||||
| 1907 | 3,465,620 | 8 | 9 | 5,982,621 | 9 | 2 | 9,448,241 | 17 | 11 | Consols | 61,622 | 6 | 4 | 84 | 16 | 11 |
| Ex. Bonds 1907 | 4,880,694 | 13 | 3 | 99 | 18 | 7 | ||||||||||
| Ex. Bonds 1906–15 | 1,000,000 | 0 | 0 | Par. | ||||||||||||
| Treasury Bills | 3,500,000 | 0 | 0 | Par. | ||||||||||||
| 1908 | 5,298,822 | 8 | 4 | 8,365,293 | 16 | 5 | 13,664,116 | 4 | 9 | Consols | 4,446,654 | 15 | 1 | 85 | 10 | 1 |
| War Loan | 6,173,145 | 11 | 3 | 99 | 12 | 2 | ||||||||||
| Treasury Bills | 1,213,000 | 0 | 0 | Par. | ||||||||||||
| Ex. Bonds 1907 | 1,500,000 | 0 | 0 | Par. | ||||||||||||
| Ex. Bonds 1906–15 | 1,000,000 | 0 | 0 | Par. | ||||||||||||
| 1909 | 4,125,595 | 16 | 7 | 4,455,126 | 4 | 1 | 11,580,722 | 0 | 8 | Consols | 7,042,931 | 8 | 8 | 84 | 9 | 11 |
| War Loan | 2,487,251 | 11 | 4 | 99 | 18 | 1 | ||||||||||
| Deficiency Advs. | 1,500,000 | 0 | 0 | Par. | ||||||||||||
| Ex. Bonds 1906–15 | 1,000,000 | 0 | 0 | Par. | ||||||||||||
| Savings Banks | 644,905 | 2 | 6 | Par. | ||||||||||||
| Deficiency Anny. | ||||||||||||||||
| 1910 | — | 1,000,000 | 0 | 0 | 1,000,000 | 0 | 0 | Ex. Bonds 1906–15 | 1,000,000 | 0 | 0 | Par. | ||||
| 1911 | — | 4,112,961 | 5 | 8 | 4,112,961 | 5 | 8 | Consols | 3,849,335 | 3 | 4 | 80 | 17 | 5 | ||
| Ex. Bonds 1906–15 | 1,000,000 | 0 | 0 | Par. | ||||||||||||
| NOTE.—The Debt cancelled with the Sinking Fund receipts of each year is given, although the actual application of the money was not always made in the same financial year in which it was received. | ||||||||||||||||
National Insurance Bill
Statistics Of Sickness (Manchester Unity)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if any later statistics of the sickness experience of the Manchester Unity are now available; and whether such information has been submitted to the actuaries who advised upon the National Insurance Bill, and, if so, has any supplementary Report been issued?
No later statistics are available in a form of which the actuaries could make use.
Holloway Societies
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether under the National Insurance Bill, Holloway societies, which are actuarily solvent and number over 10,000 members, and are therefore qualified to become approved societies, will in. the future be allowed, under a re-arranged scheme, to share out their surplus funds among their members, or whether all societies will in the future have to form superannuation funds?
The surplus funds realised from the contributions under the National Health Insurance will of course have to be applied to the additional benefit prescribed by the Bill, but the Holloway societies will be free to deal with all funds contributed outside the National Scheme on precisely the same basis as at present.
Pulmonary Tuberculosis
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether his attention has been called to the fact that during the ten years ending 1908 the death-rate from pulmonary tuberculosis was 13.3 per 10,000 of the population of the United Kingdom, and 17.9 per 10,000 of the population of that part of the German Empire for which Returns have been furnished to the Registrar-General for England and Wales; and whether he can give the House information as to the cause of the higher death-rate from this disease existing in Germany despite State sick insurance there for many years?
It is undoubtedly the case that the rate of mortality from pulmonary tuberculosis is higher in Germany than in the United Kingdom. There has been a large reduction in the death rate from this cause in Germany since the Sickness and Invalidity Insurance laws have been in full operation, and German authorities attribute the reduction in part to the beneficial influence of these laws upon the health of the nation, and particularly to the measures adopted— including an extensive system of sanatoria —for the treatment of consumption in the early stages of the disease. The same authorities agree that unsatisfactory conditions of life, and especially of housing, contribute largely to the existing high rate of mortality from consumption.
Expectation Or Sickness
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether the average expectation of sickness referred to in Clause 46 (2) of the National Insurance Bill means the average expectation of sickness among the whole body of insured persons for the administration of whose sickness and disablement benefits the society or committee is responsible, or among such members of that body as are employed in a particular trade or calling?
The average expectations of sickness in the Clause referred to means the average expectation taking into account all the normal circumstances of the cases by contrast with the exceptional circumstances of which an excess over the average is to be regarded as primâ facie evidence.
Local Taxation (County Longford)
asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland if any deduction was made from the grants payable to county Longford in relief of local taxation, before or after a special rate of 1¾d. in the £ was struck for extra police in that county for the financial year finding the 31st March last?
Deductions were made from grants payable to the county council of county Longford, both before and after the special rate mentioned was struck.
asked the Chief Secretary if he is aware that in the county of Longford the local rates, irrespective of levies for extra police, malicious injuries, etc., have increased from 2s. 5d. on land and 4s. l½d. on buildings for the year ended 31st March, 1908, to 3s. 3¾d. on land and 5s. 0¼d. on buildings in the current financial year; and if he can explain the causes of this increase?
The poundage rates mentioned are those made for the Longford Rural District for the years specified, but the county includes two other rural districts in which the rates are lower. The explanation for the increase of the poundage rates is presumably increased expenditure. County councils have no control over the expenditure of boards of guardians, rural district councils, and committees of district lunatic asylums, though they are bound to strike a rate sufficient to meet the demands of these bodies.