Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 95: debated on Friday 6 July 1917

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers

War

Excess Profits Duty

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether a trader who, balancing his books annually at 31st December, had incurred a loss during the year to 31st December, 1914 (the Excess Profits Duty of that year being 50 per cent.) of £1,000 and only recovered that loss during the current year to 31st December, 1917 (the Excess Profits Duty being 80 per cent.) would have been entitled, according to the provisions of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1915, Section 38 (3), to set the whole of the loss of the first year against the loss of the current year, and if the result of Section 45 (2) of the Finance Act of 1916 is to entitle the Revenue to set the duty of the first period, namely, £500, against the duty of the second period, namely, £800, with the result that, although the trader has stood out of his loss for three years and has not done more in the meantime than recover his loss, he is liable to pay £300 of Excess Profits Duty, and whether, if in the like periods a gain of £1,000 has been made in the earlier year and a loss of £800 be made in the later period, leaving a net gain of £200, the trader will be liable to any Excess Profits Duty by reason of his setting the duty on the profit of the earlier year against the duty on the profit of the later year?

The set-off provided by Section 38 (3) of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1915, is a set-off of duty and the only modification introduced in this connection by the Finance Act, 1916, was consequential upon the increase in the rate of duty which that Act imposed. In the circumstances specified in the last part of the question the duty paid would be recoverable. For the rest, I would refer my hon. Friend to the reply I gave him on the 27th June.

Food Supplies

Sugar

asked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Food on what principle, the supply of sugar reserved for the conversion of homegrown fruits into home-made preserves and jams is being distributed; is he aware that many applicants have been denied sugar and that others have not even received acknowledgment of their applications; and will he say what steps he proposes to take to ensure an equitable distribution?

Sugar has been distributed to private growers of fruit who undertook in writing to use the sugar for preserving their fruit, and for no other purpose. Applicants who applied in time and who enclosed a stamped and addressed envelope have, with few exceptions, received a substantial proportion of their sugar, though in dealing with 750,000 applications some errors and mishaps have inevitably occurred. It is not proposed to reopen any particular case.

Tea

asked the Parliamentary Secretary to tine Ministry of Food whether the Food Controller is aware that since the date of the Prime Minister's restrictions of imports speech a quantity of tea amounting to about 6,000,000 pounds has been exported and passed through the country in transit according to the London Customs bills of entry, Bill B; whether lie will state the quantity of green tea included in these exports; whether, in view of the expected short supply of tea, these exports and transhipments are to be allowed to continue; and, if so, whether the same facilities for export and transhipment of tea that have already been granted will be granted to all firms engaged in these trades?

The answer to the first part of the question is in the affirmative. I understand that about four-fifths of the total transhipments and exports consisted of green tea, which is not generally consumed in this country. Permission to export, whether by way of transhipment or otherwise, will only be given for the use of British Colonies where the lea cannot be obtained elsewhere, or for classes of tea unsuitable for consumption here, and will be given on the same terms to all firms. I should add that it has been necessary, as an exceptional measure, recently to grant licences for limited shipment to two firms in pursuance of an understanding on behalf of the Department given some months ago.

asked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Food whether he has any information showing whether the scheme of tea control under the Rules and Regulations issued by the Tea Advisory Committee is giving satisfaction to the tea trade; whether he will say whether those Rules and Regulations have received the consent and approval of the Food Controller; whether a number of large distributors of tea have not accepted those Rules and Regulations and have not given the necessary undertaking, with the consequence that they are unable to buy and supply their country customers with tea; if he will say for what reason the amendments to this scheme that have been urged upon the Tea Advisory Committee have not been accepted; if he will state by which Order, if any, the Tea Advisory Committee was appointed; and if this Committee is in agreement with a majority of the tea traders in the City of London?

The scheme of tea control under the Rules and Regulations issued by the Tea Advisory Committee has met with opposition in certain quarters, and I understand that some large distributors of tea have declined to accept it, although I am not aware that they have been unable to supply their customers with tea. The whole question of ensuring adequate supplies of tea at reasonable prices is now being reconsidered, and the Food Controller has invited all sections of the trade, including those who are dissatisfied with the present arrangements, to assist him in drawing up a new scheme.

Bacon

asked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Food how much bacon in warehouses and cold stores in London is held by foreign sellers and how much by home merchants; and will he show how these amounts compare with corresponding dates in the last five years?

There are no precise figures readily obtainable as to the information required by the hon. Member, but, so far as I can ascertain, of the quantity of bacon now in cold stores in London approximately two-thirds is held on behalf of foreign sellers, the balance being the property of home merchants. This proportion appears to have been normal throughout the last five years, although the existing stocks are heavier than usual.

Free Licence Holders (Certificates)

asked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Food whether he is aware that free licence holders, having previously obtained their supplies of beer from wholesale dealers who are neither brewers nor brewers' agents, are not entitled to demand certificates, and are now experiencing difficulty in obtaining their reduced supplies; and whether he will consider the propriety and fairness of at once putting them on the same footing as free licence holders whose supplies are received direct from brewers or their agents, by amending Section 2 (5) of the Intoxicating Liquor (Output and Delivery) Order, 1917?

The answer to the first part of the question is in the affirmative. The Intoxicating Liquor (Output and Delivery) Order, 1917, on this point repeats the provisions of the Output of Beer Restrictions. No evidence has hitherto been laid before me to suggest that the rule involves any hardship so substantial as to justify the setting up of the somewhat cumbersome machinery required for its removal.

Irish Rebellion (Compensation Claims)

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland whether a claim for £100 has been received by the Rebellion (Victims) Committee on behalf of John Young, 24, Garden Lane, Dublin, who sustained serious injuries to his ankle during the disturbances of Easter week, 1916; if he is aware that the Committee only awarded a sum of £24 in this case, that the applicant was four months in hospital as a result of his injuries and was unable to work for a further nine months, and that he will be partially incapacitated for life; and if he will give instructions to the Committee to reconsider this case in order that this man may be adequately compensated for his injuries and the loss he has sustained as a consequence?

Mr. John Young was awarded an ex gratia grant of £24 13s. 10d. in respect of the injury received by him in the Rebellion. The grant was for the period from 25th April, 1916, to 20th April, 1917. when he resumed work at his former rate of wages. He has been informed that his case will be further considered should there be any material change in his circumstances

asked the Secretary to the Treasury whether the offers of compensation made to Mr. Dickson, Mr. Coade, and the relatives of the clerks unlawfully killed in Guinness' brewery in April, 1916, were those recommended by Sir William Goulding's Committee or are a departure therefrom suggested by the Treasury; and will he give in each case the offer made by the Treasury to the dependants of the murdered men, and the recommendation of the Rebellion Losses Committee?

I shall be happy to give the hon. Member details of the grants sanctioned by the Treasury in these cases, if he desires them; but I do not regard it as desirable to publish the proceedings of the Rebellion (Victims) Committee, to which, I presume, he refers, in these or in other cases.

Naval And Military Pensions And Grants

asked the Pensions Minister, with reference to the case of the discharged soldier, No. T4/107,838, at present in Long Grove Asylum, who has now been awarded a pension of 27s. 6d. with 15s. a week to his dependants, whether the said pension and allowance will cease if the man should recover, or in case of his death what permanent allowance will his dependants be entitled to?

In the absence of name and regimental particulars it is impossible to identify the man to whom the hon. Member refers. If, as I assume, the pen-s-ion in a conditional one, its renewal will depend on future assessments of the degree of disablement. If the disability disappears a conditional pension would cease. If afterwards it recurred the man would be reinstated as a pensioner. If he died the award to dependants would depend principally on the cause of death and the relationship and number of the dependants.

Matches (Shortage)

asked the President of the Board of Trade if he is aware of the shortage of wooden safety matches, grocers only being able to obtain one-quarter of their requirements; and whether, with a view to reducing the inconvenience caused by the traders affected having to rely on a single firm of manufacturers, he can take steps to permit the importation of matches so as to increase the supplies available?

In order to restrict the use of freight to goods of national importance, it is not desirable that the import of matches should be allowed at present. It is not anticipated that a reduced consumption of matches will cause serious hardship, but the position is being carefully watched.