Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 95: debated on Friday 13 July 1917

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers

War

Finance Bill (Amendment)

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he has decided to propose, on the Report stage of the Finance Bill, the Amendment of Provision 10, Part I., Fourth Schedule, of the Finance (No. 2) Act. 1915; and, if so, when it will be placed upon the Paper?

Royal Engineers' Depot, Shoeburyness

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War if he is aware that the civilian workmen employed at the Royal Engineers' Depot, Shoeburyness, are being paid very much below the recognised trade union rate; if he is aware that a number of the men in question have not received the war bonus that was granted by the Government as far back as April; if he is prepared to receive a deputation of the men and officials of the trade union; and if he intends taking any action in the matter?

Instructions on the subject were issued recently, and it is understood that payment of the rates approved will be made shortly.

Air Services

Fatal Accidents (Yorkshire)

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War whether his attention has been called to the inquest held in Yorkshire on Second-lieutenant Jesson Victor, Royal Flying Corps, and to the action of the military witnesses who stated that a special Accidents Committee was coming from London to investigate the cause of the accident, and who informed the father of the deceased that he could not be present at this inquiry as it would be a purely military one; and, in view of the fact that a juryman stated that the jury were quite in the dark as to the cause of the accident, will he state why action was taken to prevent public inquiry into the death of an airman who had been flying two years in France and whose machine was stated in evidence to have broken in the air?

The object of the Accidents Committee is to inquire into accidents, both fatal and otherwise, of which the cause is technically obscure. The inquiry is purely technical and not an inquest, and the presence of relatives therefore would serve no purpose.

Military Service

Conscripted Irishmen

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War if Irishmen who were unjustly conscripted whilst on temporary work or on work of national importance in Great Britain will be allowed to place a statement of their case before the Committee appointed to deal with the re-examination of men called for military service; and if the cases of Private Timothy Cronin, No. 29,618, A Company, 3rd South Wales Borderers, Gunner Joseph Browne, Royal Field Artillery, Maryhill Barracks, Glasgow, and Private Thomas Lynaham, Taverham Camp, will be considered by this Committee?

The Special Committee appointed by the House to investigate the working of the Military Service (Review of Exceptions) Act, 1917, is not applicable to the cases referred to In the hon. Member's question. Such cases would not come within the terms of reference of the Committee. With reference to the case of Cronin, the hon. Member has already been informed that as Cronin was a voluntarily attested man there was no question of his being excepted from the liability to service on the ground that he was ordinarily resident in Ireland and only temporarily resident in Great Britain, and as Cronin was not in possession of any certificate of exemption he was rightly called up and properly handed over by the magistrates as being an absentee from military service. With reference to the case of Gunner Joseph Browne, I must refer the hon. Member to the answer which was given to him on the 12th July. With reference to the case of Private Lynam, the hon. Member has already been informed that inquiries are being made into the facts of this case, and the inquiries have taken longer than was anticipated owing to the fact that Private Lynam has recently been transferred at his own request to the Royal Irish Fusiliers.

Recruiting Officers (London)

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War if he will take steps to increase the number of recruiting officers in the London area so as to enable each individual officer to have one half-day off duty in each week, in view of the fact that these officers, who are over age and unfit, have sometimes to work for twelve or fourteen hours a day?

There are approximately 220 officers employed in London, exclusive of the. War Office in the various sub-area and munition area recruiting offices and substitution offices. The work is admittedly heavy, but with the exception of supplying an extra officer, when asked for, it is doubtful if the total number can be increased with advantage, as the duties cannot be further distributed without creating congestion.

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War whether he is aware that the male civilian staff employed by the recruiting officers are not paid for overtime work, whereas the female staff is paid for overtime work; and whether he will take steps to remedy this inequality?

As stated in my answer to the hon. Member for Bermondsey on the 30th April last, the rates of pay of the male staff in recruiting offices are inclusive rates calculated to cover all time worked. As regards the female staff, it is considered preferable to limit the normal hours to forty-two hours a week, and to pay overtime when extra attendance is found necessary.

Hospital Ships (Staffs)

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War, in view of the services rendered by the Royal Army Medical Corps on board the hospital ships, and the fact that they are in the zone of danger from mines and torpedoes, whether the Army Council will consider if their services at the end of three years of war may be more fully recognised, especially in the Honours List; and whether he can make any statement as to those services?

While recognising fully the services of the staffs of hospital ships, I hardly think that the risks they run are as great as those encountered by the combatant or medical corps at the front.

Naval And Military Pensions And Grants

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War whether his attention has been drawn to the ease of Charles Bourdon, late Private No. 6,050, 2-6th North Staffordshire Regiment, who was discharged from Ebbrington Hospital, Ireland, on 21st February, 1917, with a pass for Burton-on-Trent, but on arrival there was told that his depot was at Lichfield and given a pass via London with permission to sleep the night at his own home in Hammersmith; whether he is aware that this man collapsed on arrival at his home and has since been under constant medical care but was discharged from the Army on 8th March, 1917, without appearing before any medical board and received no money whatever until 26th March, when his back pay was sent in response to telegrams dispatched by the local War Pensions Committee; and if he can explain why Bourdon has received neither pension nor gratuity nor Mrs. Bourdon any separation allowance since the end of February, although she was entitled to it until 22nd March.

This question raises a number of matters necessitating local inquiry. I will call for reports and inform my hon. Friend of the result.

Railway Fares (Jurymen)

asked the President of the Board of Trade whether, in view of the hardship caused by reason of the increase of railway fares to persons having to travel by rail in order to discharge the public duty of serving as jurymen, he will arrange for the issue to such persons of return tickets of all classes at single normal fares, that is, fares not increased by 50 per cent., as is done in the case of first-class tickets issued to officers of His Majesty's forces travelling on leave?

This matter has already been carefully considered, and. I regret that it has not been found practicable to issue cheap railway tickets to-jurymen.

Chinese Labour (Smethwick)

asked the Minister of Labour if he is now able to state the result of his inquiries into the complaint regarding the employment of Chinese labour in the Smethwick district?

I regret that it has not yet been possible to complete the necessary inquiries, which have involved reference to other Government Departments, but I will let my hon. Friend know the result at the earliest possible moment.

National Fire Brigades Union

asked the First Commissioner of Works whether it is proposed to take over the premises of the National Fire Brigades Union, in Northumberland Avenue, for the purposes of the Government; and whether, halving regard to the importance of the work of this union, representing 800 fire brigades, and to the disorganisation resulting from such disturbance, he will consider the advisability of taking over other premises in the immediate neighbourhood?

The answer to the first part of the question is in the negative; the remainder of the question, therefore, does not arise.