Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 105: debated on Tuesday 30 April 1918

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers

War

Budget Proposals

Income Tax

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what was the gross amount of income brought under review by the Commissioners of Inland Revenue during the year ended 31st March, 1917; and what were the amounts of Income Tax collected from persons whose incomes did not exceed £300 a year in each of the years ended 31st March, 1917, and 31st March, 1918, respectively?

The gross amount of income brought under review in the year 1916–17 is estimated at £1,655,000,000. The figures asked for in the second part of the question are not available.

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether Income Tax is now being charged in respect of pleasure grounds occupied by the owner and, in fact, producing no income; and, if so, under what Statute such a tax is imposed?

The Income Tax Acts impose charges (1) under Schedule A in respect of the property in all lands in the United Kingdom, and (2) under Schedule B in respect of the occupation of all such lands. In this connection reference may be made to Section 2 of the Income Tax Act of 1853 and to Sections 60 and 63 of the Income Tax Act of 1842.

Military Service

Government Departments (Officers And Men Under Forty)

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he will cause a Return to be issued without delay giving the number of officers and men up to the age of forty years, fit for service overseas, who are employed in the various Departments of the Admiralty, War Office, Royal Air Force, Ministry of Munitions, Ministry of National Service, Food Ministry, and the Civil Service; and whether instructions will be forthwith issued to the majority of these officers and men to proceed abroad and their positions refilled by those who have been wounded or are unfit for general service?

I regret that the Return is not yet complete. If my hon. and gallant Friend will repeat his question in about a week's time, I hope that complete figures will be available.

Roxburgh Farmer

asked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Food whether the Ministry has been applied to by Mrs. Charles Anton, of Mertoun Bridge, St. Boswell's, in the county of Roxburgh, to arrange for the return from his regiment, the 11th Royal Scots, for a period of three months' leave of her husband, Private Charles Anton, 10th Platoon, C Company, to help her in the hard work of their farm, a 10-acre holding, with three milch cows, two calves, pig, sheep, and 100 poultry, and especially as to pig-breeding, ploughing, and carting out and spreading two years' manure; and whether the Ministry is doing anything to get the requisite permission from the War Office?

No record can be found of any application for the release of Private Charles Anton having been made to the Ministry of Food. I shall be glad to discuss with the hon. Baronet the steps proper to be taken in order to get the requisite permission.

Army Clothing Department (Workers' Accident)

asked the Secretary to the Treasury whether his attention has been called to the case of Miss M. E. Garratty, 26, Clarke's Orchard, Rotherhithe, S.E., to whom a letter was sent by the Royal Army Clothing Department (Boot Depot) on 22nd April, 1918, stating that a further payment of 3s. 3d. per week for a period would be granted to her by the Treasury from 26th March last; and whether this amount can be augmented, in view of the fact that, owing to the original accident, she is still incapacitated from work, possessing a doctor's certificate to that effect, and has no other means of support?

I have caused further inquiry to be made as to the present con- dition of this worker, and will communicate with the hon. and gallant Member in due course.

General Prisons Service (Ireland)

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland whether he can state the circumstances under which John J. Cassidy, retired from the prison service at Cork, was deprived of his pension; whether Mr. Cassidy had completed thirty-two years' meritorious service and had been presented with the Imperial Service medal in recognition of his long and devoted attention to duty; whether, he having in response to the Government call volunteered for and obtained a position at Woolwich Arsenal in 1915, the prison authorities thereupon withdrew his pension; whether he can state the reason for this; and whether the authorities, taking into consideration this apparent act of injustice will restore his pension and make it retrospective as from the date on which it was cut off?

Mr. J. J. Cassidy was retired from the situation of ordinary warder in the General Prisons Service, Ireland, on 10th July, 1915, on the ground of permanent infirmity of body at the age of fifty-four. He had served thirty complete years, and was awarded a pension of £33 9s. 9d., and an additional allowance of £100 0s. 4d., and the Imperial Service Medal. After his retirement he was re-employed first by the Admiralty, secondly, by the Ministry of Munitions. As his earnings now greatly exceed the pay which he received in his former office his pension has been suspended in accordance with the express provisions of Section 20 of the Superannuation Act, 1834. The answer to the latter part of the question is in the negative.

Mesopotamia Campaign (Surgeon-General Macneece)

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War what has been the result, if any, of the private inquiry by the Army Council into the charges made against Surgeon-General J. G. MacNeece in connection with the campaign in Mesopotamia?

The Army Council have received and considered a statement by Surgeon-General MacNeece in regard to the findings of the Mesopotamia Commission in his case, and they have formed the opinion that no blame can be attached to him in regard to the manner in which he carried out his duties in connection with the medical services during the campaign.

Naval And Military Pensions And Grants

asked the Undersecretary of State for War whether he is aware that Private A. Rigby, No. 7806, Grenadier Guards, was wounded at Loos; that he was discharged from hospital about ten days before his discharge from the Army; that his discharge certificate shows that he was discharged under Paragraph 392 (XXI.), King's Regulations; that he has received neither pension or gratuity; and whether he can state the reason why this soldier was not discharged under Paragraph 392 (XVI.)?

I hope my hon. and gallant Friend will furnish me with the further information for which I have asked him privately, in order that Private Rigby may be medically boarded and his case submitted to the Ministry of Pensions.

Munitions

Messrs Harding, Wace, And Creischere

asked the Minister of Munitions whether, in view of all the facts in connection with the firm of Harding, Wace, and Creischere, and having regard to the importance of a factory which has 140 huts and twelve magazines which produces high explosives and has done a good deal of work for the Admiralty in the filling of mines, he can see his way to take over these works and keep them going on behalf of the Government?

My right hon. Friend has asked me to reply to this question. So far as we are concerned, it is not considered desirable to take over this firm.

Enfield Workers (Train Service)

asked the Minister of Munitions what steps have yet been taken at the Enfield Small Arms Works to give improved facilities to the workpeople arriving at and leaving the works by train; and whether he will have a special inquiry made on the spot in view of the discontent that prevails with the present arrangements?

I understand that the train arrangements for workers at Enfield Small Arms Works are satisfactory except in one instance where the railway company have been unable, owing to congestion in that portion of the line, to provide additional trains. The matter is still engaging the special attention of the Transport Department of the Ministry, and I shall be glad to consider any representation which my hon. Friend may wish to make.

Representation Of The People Act

Work Of National Importance

asked the President of the Local Government Board whether he will announce what are the bodies and the work of national importance service in which will entitle a person to the franchise under Section 5 (3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1918?

The work of the following bodies has been recognised by the Admiralty, Army Council, and Air Council as work of national importance in connection with the War:—Young Men's Christian Association, Salvation Army, Church Army, Scottish Churches Huts, Catholic Women's League, Catholic Club Huts, United Navy and Army Board, Soldiers' Christian Association, the Colonial and Continental Church Society, Navy and Army Canteen Board, Wesleyan Army and Navy Board, and the Young Women's Christian Association. The information has been published in the form of a pamphlet, R.P. 7, which has been placed on sale and may be purchased through any bookseller or directly from His Majesty's Stationery Office.

Increase Of Rent, Etc (War Restrictions) Act

asked the Minister of Reconstruction if he will state the terms of reference to the Committee which he has set up under the chairmanship of Lord Hunter; and if one of its objects is to consider the extension of the Increase of Rent and Mortgage Interest (War Restrictions) Act beyond the period of six months after the War specified in that Act?

The terms of reference of the Committee, as already announced in the Press, are as follows:

To consider the legislation embodied in the Increase of Rent and Mortgage Interest (War Restrictions) Act, 1915, as amended, in relation to the housing of the working-classes after the War, and to recommend what steps, if any, should be taken to remove any difficulties which may arise in connection therewith.
The consideration of the extension of the Act is clearly within the reference of the Committee.

Aerodrome Works (Labour)

asked the President of the Board of Agriculture whether he is aware that in certain aerodrome works in Hampshire agricultural labourers are being attracted to this work under the promise of high wages, with a result that agriculture in the neighbourhood is being seriously affected; and what action he proposes to take?

I am aware that at one time cases occurred in which labourers in Hampshire were taken on in aerodromes, and if the hon. and gallant Member can supply me with any recent cases I will have an inquiry made into them. The hon. and gallant Member is probably aware of the Instructions recently issued by the Air Ministry, which have been quoted in this House, namely, that all contractors shall engage labour only through Employment Exchanges, and that these Exchanges shall not send forward for work on aerodrome construction any applicant whose last employer was a farmer, or who is known to be an agricultural labourer.