Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 109: debated on Monday 29 July 1918

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers

War

Food Supplies

Tea

asked the Food Controller, seeing that the Government is enabled to buy tea f.o.b. at Colombo for 8⅛d. per lb., what profit they are making between the price quoted and the 2s. 8d. that the tea costs the public?

At the present rate of exchange the f.o.b. price of tea at Colombo is almost exactly 10d. a lb. The profit or margin between the cost and selling prices is estimated to be about¼per lb.

Bacon

asked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Food whether he is aware that a certain food control committee state that, having in vain applied to the Food Ministry to permit a freer sale of bacon to avoid the waste now taking place, they have in consequence threatened not to prosecute tradesmen selling excess quantities; and whether he has any statement to make on the subject?

The hon. Member presumably has in mind the Bristol Food Control Committee. In view of the representations of this committee, the Divisional Food Commissioner was authorised to permit, and did permit, the sale of bacon coupon free in Bristol for a limited period, provided it was released from storage in a manner approved by representatives of the Ministry of Food. I may point out that the release of bacon generally from coupon restrictions renders the continuance of this special arrangement unnecessary.

Meat

asked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Food whether he is aware that London butchers are still having allotted to them old cow meat which, in pre-war days, would have been condemned as unfit for human consumption, and that in many cases London butchers are having delivered to them meat of inferior quality which is practically nothing but skin and bone; will he say on what grounds such meat is imported, seeing that there is no nutriment in it; and whether, considering the price that is demanded by the butchers in consequence of the cost to them, he will preclude altogether the importation into this country of such inferior meat?

The answer to this question was printed in last Thursday's OFFICIAL REPORT.

Plums

asked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Ministry of Food if he is aware that quantities of English plums are being put on the markets daily; and if it is his intention to control the price before the whole crop is disposed of?

Yes, Sir. An Order has been issued by the Food Controller, which takes effect from to-day, restricting dealings in and the prices for certain varieties of plums. I will send the hon. Member a copy of this Order.

Soldiers On Leave (Rations)

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War whether, according to the Army Council's Instruction No. 650, of 10th June, 1918, a soldier, not a member of an Expeditionary Force, if granted four days' leave, is entitled to two meat coupons only, and no coupons for butter, lard, or sugar, and consequently has to live while on the four days' leave without these three rationed foods, unless his family or his friends supply him; and whether he will take steps to place the soldier on a level with the civilian by means of an emergency card?

A soldier who is not a member of an Expeditionary Force, if granted four days' leave, is entitled to four meat coupons, of which three are for butchers' meat only. The issue of half-coupons for butter, lard, and sugar, for soldiers on leave for periods not exceeding four days has been suggested to the Ministry of Food.

Ireland

Licensed Trade

asked the Food Controller if any steps have yet been taken by his Department to remedy the grievances of small licensed traders in Ireland who have not been able to obtain supplies of stout and porter from wholesale traders with whom they dealt in the datum year, and who cannot obtain supplies directly from brewers; and is he aware that, although these small dealers have paid for their publicans' licences, they have been deprived of their means of livelihood by Orders of the Department depriving them of the right to obtain supplies?

I can add nothing to the answer given last Thursday to the hon. Member for West Kerry on this subject, except to repeat the Food Controller's assurance that there will be no delay in dealing with the matter.

Dingle Harbour

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland whether he is aware that the representations have been received from the Dingle Harbour Board stating that no vessels have loaded or discharged at the port for over twelve months; that the Board has no revenue, no reserve, and no means of carrying on its work; and what steps it is proposed to take under these circumstances to maintain the lights so necessary for fishermen?

The answer to the first part of the question is in the affirmative. I am aware that, owing to the War, the revenue of the Dingle Harbour Board has decreased to such an extent that great difficulty is found in maintaining the Lighthouse. So far, however, I have been unable to find any means of assisting them.

Dublin Metropolitan Police

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland how many constables of the Dublin Metropolitan Police have resigned or left the force since the Clause to the Military Service Act was passed making it applicable to Ireland; whether he is aware that discontent exists amongst the rank and file of the force; and if he will grant a sworn inquiry into the administration of the police force in Dublin, including the disappearance of property placed under the control of an officer of the C Division during the week succeeding the rebellion in Ireland?

Since the 18th April twelve constables of the Dublin Metropolitan Police resigned voluntarily, two resigned compulsorily, five were dismissed, two discharged on medical certificate, and one retired on pension. Of those who resigned voluntarily, ten did so to better their position, one resigned as he found police duty affected his health, and one because he had been punished for a disciplinary offence. I am not aware that any discontent exists in the force. With regard to the last part of the question, if the hon. Member will formulate any definite charge upon which action could be taken, I will consider the matter.

Cork Assizes (Jury)

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland on whose instructions the legal representatives of the Crown, at the trial of Patrick O'Brien and William O'Brien at the Cork Assizes on the 23rd instant, ordered eighty special jurors to stand by in order to secure a jury to convict the prisoners, irrespective of the weight of evidence; whether it was on the grounds of religion or politics that these special jurors, comprising the most prominent and respectable citizens of Cork, were deemed by the Crown un-suited to try the charges against the prisoners; if on neither, can he state the grounds on which they were ordered to stand by; and whether it is the intention of the Crown to continue selecting jurors to constitute juries for the trial of criminal and politico-criminal cases in Cork because of the jurors' religious or political bias, and so deprive the prisoners of a fair and impartial trial?

There is no foundation for the allegation that any jurors were ordered to stand by in order to secure a jury to convict irrespective of the weight of evidence. No jurors were ordered to stand by on the ground of either politics or religion. The jurors ordered to stand by were so ordered because there was sufficient reason to believe that owing to liability to be influenced they might not be impartial or owing to bodily or mental infirmity they were unfit to serve as jurors.

Aliens' Dependants

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland whether, in the case of aliens interned in England who leave wives and families unprovided for, the Government makes weekly grants to these people for their support, and, if so, what is the rate per head; and whether a different law is to be applied in Ireland where these people are told to apply to the local Poor Law guardians, thus imposing a burden on Irish ratepayers and securing their penalisation for a Government action for which they have no responsibility?

Allowances are made from funds provided by the British Government to the British-born wives and children of interned or repatriated aliens who are without sufficient resources. It was considered that the most effective manner of affording assistance to such persons was to make grants through the agency of a board of guardians not as Poor Law relief administered in the ordinary course of their duties, but as grants made under the authority of the Government and charged to the funds placed at the disposal of the Local Government Board. The rate of assistance is determined according to the peculiar circumstances of each case. The allowances payable in ordinary cases are 10s. weekly for the wife and 3s. weekly for each dependent child. It does not appear that the arrangements in Ireland differ materially from those in England.

Volunteers (Arms And Ammunition)

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland whether he is aware that numbers of Irish National Volunteers have been called upon to surrender their rifles; if so, by whom and at what date such order was made, and also if a similar order was made with reference to the Ulster Volunteers, and on what date; whether the rifles of the Ulster Volunteers have been surrendered; if so, will he state the number and the date; whether any of the Ulster Volunteers have declined or neglected to surrender their rifles; if so, what action it is proposed to take to deal with them; if he has asked for or received the permission of the president of the provisional government of Ulster before taking any steps to take up the arms of the Ulster Volunteers, or does he intend to have a raid made on the places where the Ulster Volunteer rifles are stored and prosecute the leaders for not delivering the rifles to the Government; and whether he will postpone all proceedings against National Volunteers, and return the rifles already seized, until similar action is taken against the Ulster Volunteer leaders?

I cannot make any general statement at present with regard to the matter referred to in the question, beyond saying that steps are in progress to secure the surrender of arms throughout the entire country.

Ulster Provisional Council

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland what reply was given by the leaders of the Ulster Volunteers to the request by the Government for the surrender of the arms and ammunition held by the Volunteers; whether the Ulster Provisional Government formed by the leaders of the Ulster Volunteers is still in existence; and, if so, whether it is the intention of the Government to proclaim this body as an illegal and dangerous association?

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland whether there is in existence a body known as the Provisional Government of Ulster and, if so, who are the members of it; and whether the Government of Ireland is controlled by this provisional Council or by His Excellency Field-Marshal Lord French and the War Cabinet?

I am informed that such a body as that referred to is in existence, but I am not aware as to who are the members of it. There is no foundation for the suggestion that Ireland is controlled by this provisional council.

Defence Of The Realm Prosecution

asked the Attorney-General for Ireland whether his attention has been called to the prosecution in Dublin last week of William J. Warren, a member of the National Volunteers, for an alleged refusal to give information in respect of the place where rifles are stored; whether it is known to the Irish Government that several persons in Ireland in high position have rifles, small arms, and equipment in their safe keep- ing; and whether it is that Mr. Warren has been a supporter of the Irish party that he has been singled out for a criminal prosecution?

I am informed that the prosecution which is under Regulation 53 of the Defence of the Realm Regulations is still sub judice, and accordingly I can make no statement with reference to it. The answer to the last portion of the question of the hon. Member is an emphatic negative.

Mail Service

asked the Postmaster-General what amount of subsidy has been paid by his Department for the acceleration effected within the past twenty-six years of the mail trains on the Dublin and South-Eastern Railway line in connection with the mail boat to Kingstown; whether this subsidy is still continued; whether there would be any objection from a postal standpoint to the morning down mail train being started at the same time as the morning down mail trains on the Great Northern, the Great Southern and Western, and the Midland and Great Western Railways; whether he requires the mail trains on the Dublin and South-Eastern Railway to stop at all the small stations on the journey, or whether these stations, including those only 3 to 4 miles apart, could now be served with mails in, the same manner as before the recent changes; whether the extreme time between the arrival of the down mail and the return of the up mail for English letters for the country generally has been reduced, so that Belfast loses one hour, Cork loses one hour and twenty-five minutes, Galway loses one hour and fifty-five minutes, and Wexford loses four hours; whether the margin of time in Wexford has been reduced from seven hours to three hours; whether this reduction is virtually twice as much as that made in Galway, three times as much as that in Cork, and four times as much as that in Belfast; and whether, in view of the inconvenience suffered by the commercial, industrial, and professional classes concerned, and of the apparently unfair differentiation against Wexford, Enniscorthy, and New Ross, and provided that the special local committee appointed for the purpose of dealing with this question can produce a practical scheme which will not involve increased coal consumption and produce very slight, if any, inconvenience to the travelling public, he will order a new service by which Wexford will be treated in something like the same manner as the other terminal towns on the main lines out of Dublin?

No question of subsidy arises in this case, for the train alterations to which the hon. Member refers were necessary in the national interest and were carried out on instructions issued by the Irish Railway Executive Committee at the request of the Government. I had no alternative but to accept them. I will consider any suggestion for the improvement of the mail service which does not involve increased consumption of coal or increased expenditure.

Old Age Pensions

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland whether any fresh instructions have recently been issued to the Irish pension officers to raise questions in the case of old age pensioners, many of whom have been enjoying these pensions since the Old Age Pension Act was passed; whether any bonus or other reward is paid to such officers for showing special activity in this matter; whether he can state the total number of persons deprived of pensions for the six months ending 30th June, 1918; and if this practice is to be continued?

The answer to the first and second parts of the hon. Member's question is in the negative. The suggestion that pension officers have a personal interest in the disqualification of old age pensioners is entirely without foundation and is keenly resented, and justly so, by pension officers. It has been contradicted already in this House on various occasions, in one instance in reply to a similar question put by the hon. Member to the Financial Secretary to the Treasury on the 1st of March, 1910. The figures referred to in the third part of the question are not available.

War Service (Decorations)

asked the Secretary to the Admiralty whether the question of the wearing of some distinctive badge or decoration by men employed on Govern- ment tugs and yard craft indicating their period of war service has yet been considered by the Board of Admiralty; and, if not, will he take the requisite steps to place this matter before them for their consideration and decision?

The question of extending the award of chevrons to these men in dockyard craft has been considered. Chevrons, however, are badges awarded to officers and men in the Navy and Army for certain belligerent service, and it is not proposed to extend the award to civilians, especially as it would be impossible to differentiate between those who are and those who are not incurring a sufficient degree of war risk to justify such a distinction.

asked the First Lord of the Admiralty what steps His Majesty's Government are taking to recognise the services and sacrifices of the mercantile marine either in the form of pensions, or allowances to dependants, or of other appropriate decoration, or of any of these in combination, according to circumstances?

I have prepared a detailed answer to this question, which I hope my hon. Friend will allow me to circulate with the OFFICIAL REPORT, as it is rather lengthy.

National Shipyards (Machines And Material)

asked the First Lord of the Admiralty what priority is given for machines and material required for the national shipyards; and what priority is given for machines and material in private shipyards?

The class of priority given for machines and material for use in the shipyards varies with the date at which such machinery and material is required. No preference is given to the national yards in the supply of plant or material. On the contrary, it has always been, and always will be, the rule that orders for plant for private yards shall receive priority both as to machinery and material over orders placed for the national yards; in fact, cases have occurred where machinery was ordered and built for the national yards, and such machinery has been diverted to the private yard.

Admiralty Labour Department

asked the First Lord of the Admiralty if the Shipyards Labour Department has been disbanded; and, if so, can he state the reasons for this action?

The Department referred to by my hon. and gallant Friend is now known as the Admiralty Labour Department. This Department has not been disbanded; nor, I may add, is it intended to disband it. The Department has been placed under the general superintendence of the Third Civil Lord, Sir Robert S. Home, K.B.E., K.C.

Naval And Military Pensions And Grants

asked the Pensions Minister whether he is aware that Private J. Waters, No. CH/10314, Royal Marine Light Infantry, joined the Service in 1898, and made no allotment to his parents until the death of his father in 1916, when he made an allowance of 5s. a week to his widowed mother; that an application has been made for a dependant's allowance to the mother; if so, whether it has been granted; if not, whether the dependants of soldiers and sailors who were in the Service on the outbreak of hostilities are precluded from obtaining the allowance; if so, on what grounds; or, if this is not so, why has a refusal been made to granting an allowance to Mrs. Waters?

I have been asked to answer this question. Except in cases covered by the concession recently announced, the grant of separation allowance is contingent upon the existence before the War of dependency upon a seaman or marine who was in the Service at the outbreak of hostilities. Where dependency did exist, separation allowance is payable, and, in fact, is being paid in numerous cases. In the present case, as indicated in the question, the marine was not allotting to his parents before the War, and after investigation by the local pension authorities, it was decided that pre-war dependency did not exist: separation allowance could not therefore be awarded to Mrs. Waters. To meet cases of this nature, funds have been placed at the disposal of the Special Grants Committee of the Ministry of Pensions, to be used where the application of the ordinary Regulations would cause hardship, and it is open to Mrs. Waters to approach the local war pensions committee who will, no doubt, consider whether a grant from these funds is justified.

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War if it has been decided that a soldier who obtains leave in order to increase the food supply of the nation by cultivating his allotment or small holding has his military pay stopped for the period of his absence; whether the separation allowance to his wife or other dependants is stopped for a like period; and, if so, on what ground of equity it has been decided to stop the pay of these men when similar action is not taken with those who do not devote their leave to this purpose?

Men who are given special furlough for the purpose of cultivating their allotments do not draw pay for the period of absence, and any separation allowance is stopped. They receive ordinary paid leave in addition, on the same terms as other soldiers.

asked the Financial Secretary to the War Office whether, considering that the London allowance was designed to enable those who lived in London to meet the extra cost of living involved by residence there and that such allowance is withdrawn on removal from the London area, the allowance is claimable by the wives of soldiers who find it necessary to remove from the country to London and thereby have to bear these extra costs; if not, why this allowance should be refused; and whether he will take steps to have such alterations made in order that all dependants living in the London area should receive similar treatment?

I am afraid that I can find no ground for altering the present practice, which has been in force all through the War.

asked the Financial Secretary to the War Office if he will state, categorically, what are the respective allowances payable to a soldier and his wife possessing four children for billeting and separation allowances, the case of an ordinary soldier who is billeted near his military duties, and a soldier who is billeted at home under the terms of the consolidated family allowance?

If a private soldier is separated from his family his wife receives for herself and four children under the age of fourteen a separation allowance of 31s. a week; if living with his family the soldier would receive a family allowance of 38s. a week.

Military Service

Case Under Inquiry

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War if he will inquire why Private Francis A. Boyack, No. 26663, A Company, 3rd Royal Highlanders, Raith Camp, Curragh, has been inoculated against his wish and contrary to the Army Regulations; and what action he proposes to take against those responsible for this action?

I am making inquiry, and will communicate with my hon. Friend as soon as possible.

Soldiers Over Fifty-One (Overseas Service)

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War whether soldiers over fifty-one years of age who are of medical categories other than A are liable to be sent overseas?

Local Tribunals

asked the Minister of National Service whether a protest was recently made by a discharged soldier of fifty before the Weybridge tribunal against the secretary and a member on the ground that they were both of the original military age and had not served; and whether he proposes to take any steps in the matter or in similar cases elsewhere?

I have been asked to answer this question. I had not previously been informed that a protest had been made, but I am making inquiries into the case.

Conscientious Objectors

asked the Home Secretary if he will give instructions for attention to be given to the case of Burton W. Mackay, a conscientious objector in New- castle Prison, who is suffering from his teeth and mouth and has been examined by a dental specialist who states that his case requires efficient dental treatment to avert serious consequences; and will he release this man from prison in order that he may undergo this necessary treatment?

The case has received all necessary attention. The prisoner has been seen by a dentist, and he will be allowed to have artificial teeth at his own expense if he wishes it; but his health is not impaired, and there is no sufficient reason for authorising his release.

asked the Home Secretary why an application made by a conscientious objector named Pugh, who is in Manchester Prison, to be allowed to resume work under the Home Office scheme, which he voluntarily surrendered in January, 1917, has not been granted; and whether he will see his way to grant such a request?

This man's conduct was unsatisfactory while he was employed under the Committee on Employment of Conscientious Objectors; and, when the Committee's rules came into force on 1st January, 1917, he said that he did not intend to obey them, and absconded. He was thereupon recalled to the Army, but remained at large for three months, when he was arrested. The answer to the last part of the question is in the negative.

asked the Home Secretary if he will have an immediate and thorough inquiry made into the state of health of James Hudson, M.A., a conscientious objector in Manchester Prison, who has served twenty-one months' hard labour, and is at present confined in a damp basement cell; will he inquire into the allegations that Hudson has lost 3 stone in weight and is physically breaking up; and whether, in view of the long imprisonment already suffered and the man's state of health, he will order his temporary release under the powers he possesses?

I have made inquiry in this case and find that the prisoner is confined in a dry and well-lighted cell on the ground level. He has lost only 2 lbs. in weight since September last. The prisoner's health has not been injuriously affected by imprisonment and affords no ground for authorising his discharge.

asked the Under-Secretary of State for the Home Department how many conscientious objectors are now working under the Home Office Committee at Bridge End Hut, Len Rock, Carmarthenshire, as navvies on a road-making contract; whether some of these men are housed in tents that have been condemned as unfit for use in the Army, so that their bedding and blankets are at times soaked by rain; and, if so, whether fresh arrangements can be made regarding accommodation?

Thirty-seven men employed on this contract are housed by the contractors in tents and thirteen in a hut. The Committee on Employment of Conscientious Objectors is in communication with the contractors and will see that proper accommodation is provided.

asked the Secretary for Scotland if he will have inquiry made into the case of James Boyd, a conscientious objector, now in Barlinnie Prison, Glasgow, who was released on account of the serious condition of his leg and sent to the Edinburgh War Hospital for treatment, where he remained until 12th July, when an escort appeared and took him back to Barlinnie Prison, though his treatment had not been completed, and he was and is still unable to stand on his right leg; and will he take steps to have Boyd released for the completion of his cure or discharged from the Army, in view of his unfitness?

I have made inquiry into this case. The reports which I have received do not confirm the allegations contained in the question regarding Boyd's condition. He was returned to prison upon the report of an Army medical board. The question of his discharge from the Army is a matter for the military authorities. Upon present information I am not satisfied that there is a ease for discharging him from prison on medical grounds.

Volunteer Force (Drills)

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War whether the conditions of service in Volunteer regiments include the obligation to attend drills on Sunday; and, if so, whether any provision can be made for those who object to this practice?

Under their agreements, Volunteers undertake to attend at least fourteen drills, of an hour each, a month during the recruit stage, and ten drills a month after being passed as efficient. Commanding officers of Volunteer units have General Instructions to arrange their drill programmes so as to give Volunteers a choice of times at which to attend these drills. Judging by the paucity of complaints received, I think that in the vast majority of cases commanding officers have borne in mind the desirability of arranging these programmes so as to furnish Volunteers with opportunities of attending the prescribed numbers of drills on week-days. If there is any case in which it is impossible for a Volunteer, owing to the construction of the drill programme, to put in the requisite number of drills without Sunday attendance, and hardship is thereby occasioned, inquiry will be made with a view to the modification of the programme if such a course is found to be practicable.

Wandsworth Detention Barracks

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War whether he has received complaints as to brutality to military prisoners in Wandsworth military detention barracks; and whether he will have inquiries made at once by an impartial person?

I have received no complaints beyond a letter sent to me by my hon. and gallant Friend. In view of the fact that an impartial person visits the detention barracks once a week, as laid down in the rules for military detention barracks and military prisoners, I do not think it is necessary for me to make any special inquiries.

Royal Naval Division (Engineers)

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War whether the men who joined the Divisional Engineers of the Royal Naval Division on the first formation of that corps have since been brought in whole or in part under the control of the War Office by transference to the Royal Engineers; if he is aware that these men were, at least in the case of such of them as were recruited at the buildings of the Institute of Electrical Engineers, enlisted under an undertaking which provided that they should serve for three years or for the duration of the War, whichever period should prove to be the shorter; whether any variations of the conditions of service of these men were made at the time of their transference to the Royal Engineers; if so, when and by whose authority, and were the men notified of the change; whether the men enlisted in the above-specified conditions will be granted their discharge from the Army on the termination of their fourth year of service; and, if so, whether, in the event of the War being still then in progress, these men will receive a month's re-engagement furlough, in accordance with the practice prevailing in respect of other branches of the Service?

I regret that I am not in a position to answer my hon. Friend's question to-day, but I will write to him as soon as possible.

Army Dental Service

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War whether he has now taken the steps promised a month ago to increase the number of dentists serving professionally with the British Expeditionary Force in France?

We have increased the number of dentists in this country, and are now awaiting the demands of France, which we can meet.

Travelling Restrictions (Soldiers On Leave)

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War whether cadets in Officers' Training Schools are now prohibited from travelling by train during their week-end leave; and, if so, why?

The answer to the first part of my hon. and gallant Friend's question is in the affirmative. This applies to all troops serving in the United Kingdom, and is not confined to cadets. It was found necessary, in order to relieve the congestion on the railways, to issue instructions that week-end leave should not be granted if it involved railway journeys on Saturdays, Sundays, or Mondays.

Workmen's Housing, Cippenham

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War what arrangements have been made for housing the workmen employed at Cippenham, Slough?

A hutted camp is being constructed for the men engaged on the work at Cippenham who cannot obtain lodgings locally or travel to their work daily by train.

Territorial Force (Promotion)

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War whether he has considered the position of Teritorial non-commissioned officers and men whose units have been broken up and who can only obtain acting rank on promotion in the Regular units to which they are posted, but who on becoming casualties revert to their former rank, thereby losing pay and pension; and whether, having regard to the effect of this treatment, arrangements will be made whereby their rank should be made substantive?

Non-commissioned officers and men of the Territorial Force who are posted to Regular units in the field are eligible for substantive promotion under the same conditions as other soldiers. Those who are given acting rank to fill temporary vacancies revert to their substantive rank on coming home, or as soon as they cease to perform the duties of the higher rank.

Prisoners Of War

Turkish Camps

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War what steps have been taken to ensure that the British doctors who are prisoners in Turkey are suitably distributed among the different prisoners' camps; and whether he will arrange that our rights for exchange of doctors under the Berne Agreement shall be waived, in so far as to allow of at least one British doctor remaining at each camp, and at least one per 1,000 prisoners at camps with more than 1,000 prisoners?

This matter is under consideration, and I hope that it will be possible to make arrangements on the lines suggested by my Noble Friend.

asked the hon. Member for Sheffield (Central Division) whether His Majesty's Government have requested the representatives of neutral nations at Constantinople, in co-operation with the Minister of the Netherlands, to act in concert in requesting the Sublime Porte to permit the prompt passage of food, clothing, other comforts, and money to our prisoners of war in Turkey; if not, whether His Majesty's Government will take immediate steps to make this request; and will he request the answer of the Turkish Government at the earliest possible date?

His Majesty's Government have not invited the good offices of any neutral representatives at Constantinople on behalf of British prisoners of war other than those of the Netherlands Minister, who is charged with the representation of British interests, nor are they disposed to think that the good offices of other neutral representatives could usefully be invited. It is unnecessary to add that numerous representations have been made to the Turkish Government, and that every effort has been made to secure the transmission of money and supplies to British prisoners of war.

Clothing

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War what reply has been received from the Dutch Minister at Constantinople to the question whether he can continue to supply clothing locally to British prisoners; and whether, as the dispatch of clothing to officer prisoners is permitted and the date on which the clothing to be sent by the repatriation ship will leave Alexandria is uncertain, the War Office will sanction the dispatch of clothing and blankets overland to non-commissioned officers and men?

As it is probable that the Netherlands Minister at Constantinople will be unable to supply clothing to the men in Turkey in the future, and as information has been received that the Austrian Government have removed the restrictions on the dispatch of parcels through Austria, it is hoped to arrange for the dispatch of goods overland, as the date of departure of the repatriation ship from Egypt is still unsettled.

British Residents, Belgium

asked the hon. Member for Sheffield (Central Division) whether the condition of British residents in Belgium has been considered at the recent conference at The Hague; and, if so, whether any arrangement has been made whereby they may receive letters and parcels from this country on the same terms as those accorded to prisoners of war?

The Agreement recently come to at The Hague, which, however, has not yet been ratified, provides for the repatriation of these persons. It is not possible to send parcels to uninterned British subjects in Germany or in territory in the occupation of the enemy. The question of correspondence is at present under consideration.

Soldiers' Leave

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War whether he is aware that some men have been in Egypt and Palestine since the early months of 1915; and whether arrangements can be made for giving such men furlough?

As I stated in answer to a question by my hon. Friend the Member for Blackburn on Tuesday last, a certain number of troops are granted leave to this country from Egypt as opportunity occurs, but leave from such parts is necessarily restricted as the accommodation available depends upon the shipping situation. I can assure my hon. Friend that every consideration possible in the circumstances is given to those men who have been longest without leave.

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War if he is aware that men of the Army Service Corps who have been with the Colours for three years in Salonika and have re- peatedly applied for leave have hitherto been refused, and that men of the Royal Army Medical Corps have served in France for eighteen months without leave; and whether he is now in a position to state that leave will be granted to those who have thus served?

As regards leave from Salonika, I would refer my hon. Friend to my reply to my hon. Friend the Member for Salford South; and as regards leave from France, to my reply to questions by my hon. and gallant Friend the Member for Blackpool and my right hon. Friend the Member for Kirkcaldy Burghs on Wednesday last. I am sending my hon. Friend copies of these replies.

Nerve-Strained Soldiers

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War whether any uncertifiable nerve-strained soldiers are now being discharged to the care of the Pensions Ministry; whether it is the policy of the War Office to retain all such soldiers in the Army in institutions under the care of lunacy staffs until such time as they can either return to the front or to their previous employment; and how many have been discharged from such institutions to asylums?

The answer to the first part of the question is in the affirmative. Such soldiers are retained in neurasthenic hospitals until they are fit for duty or are discharged as no longer requiring indoor hospital treatment. No such soldiers have been discharged from these institutions to asylums.

Regimental Colours (Honours)

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War whether he is aware that the Colours of American regiments, which are carried on service, have in some cases been decorated by the French Republic to mark the valour of the unit; and whether steps will be taken to ensure that the Colours of British regiments are not debarred from similar honours by the fact that they are not carried on service?

I am afraid this matter cannot be taken up at the present time. It will, however, be considered at the close of the War when the general question of honours for corps and regiments receives consideration.

Army Officers (Pay)

asked the Under-Secretary of State for War whether he can state the total pay and allowances after deduction of Income Tax received by captains, lieutenants, second lieutenants, regimental sergeant-majors, and company sergeant-majors of Infantry serving in France or elsewhere on active service?

The information desired by my hon. and gallant Friend is as follows:

Yearly rates.
Infantry—Total.
Rank.£s.d.
Captain35503
Captain (if promoted from ranks)3631511
Lieutenant306310
Second Lieutenant288126
The above rates apply in France and Salonika. In Egypt they are increased by £18 5s. a year (Colonial allowance) in each case. In Mesopotamia Indian rates apply. The above are in addition to free billets and rations, or an allowance in lieu. In addition, officers are entitled to children's allowance (£2 a, month for each child up to a total of four). This allowance is taxable, but,

per contra, there would be the usual £25 abatement in respect of each child and the abatement for a wife. Deductions for Income Tax have been made on the assumption that the officer has no other income.

Sergeant-major—£s.d.
In Egypt12955
Elsewhere12339
Company Sergeant - major—
In Egypt98171
Elsewhere95163

No deductions for Income Tax arise in these cases, as they are below the taxable limit.

Munitions

Skilled Workers (Wages)

asked the Minister of Munitions whether he can state, approximately, the maximum and minimum amount of the wages earned weekly by skilled munition workers in the various trades?

The information desired by the hon. Member does not at present exist in any precise form. It would involve very considerable labour to obtain the information in respect of the very large number of trades and of classes of skilled workers engaged in each trade, and I do not feel that, with the pressure of work in the Department, we should be justified in casting this further burden upon it.

Central Control Board (Liquor Traffic)

asked the Minister of Munitions whether he will furnish the House with a full and detailed statement of the expenditure by the Central Control Board (Liquor Traffic) of public money in the acquisition of licensed properties, such statement to contain particulars of each brewery and licensed house purchased, the price paid in each instance, and the cost of alterations, maintenance, and administration since the completion of the purchases?

I am advised that it would be contrary to the public interest to publish the detailed information asked for by my hon. Friend. Subject to audit, it may be estimated that after meeting all the usual trading charges, the annual return on the total capital commitments of the Central Control Board's direct control undertakings has been on the scale of about 15 per cent., or alternatively, if the total cost of reconstruction is charged to revenue, the return on the capital engaged will be about 10 per cent.

Royal Air Force

Flying Over Towns

asked the Under-Secretary of State to the Air Ministry whether his attention has been called to the many recent accidents through low flying of airmen over towns; and whether he can issue instructions to all air pilots to stop this practice in future?

Air Ministry Orders prohibit low flying over towns, and serious disciplinary action is taken against any pilot who is known to have avoidably infringed them.

Labour Centre, Nottingham (Regimental Paymaster)

asked the Home Secretary whether he is aware that the regimental paymaster of the Labour Centre at Nottingham, Colonel Donajowski, changed his name to Daubeney at the early part of this year; will he say by whose licence or authority this change of name was made; and what was the birthplace and nationality claimed by Colonel Donajowski?

Colonel R. E. Donajowski was born at 13, Mornington Crescent, Regent's Park, son of E. A. A. Donajowski, of the same address. He changed his name to Daubeny by deed poll on 27th February, 1918. He is a British subject.

Krahn (Conviction)

asked the Home Secretary if Krahn, who has been employed as a clerk under the War Office, was convicted at Birmingham in 1913, sentenced to five years' imprisonment and recommended for deportation; and, if so, why this recommendation was not carried out?

The answer to the first part of the question is in the affirmative, and to the second that inquiries subsequent to his conviction showed that he was not an alien but a British subject born in London, and therefore could not be expelled from the United Kingdom.

Defence Of Realm Regulations ("Hostile Origin")

asked the Home Secretary what is the official definition of "hostile origin" in Section 13 B of the Defence of the Realm Regulations?

The hon. Baronet presumably refers to Regulation 14D. There is no definition of the term "hostile origin" as used in that Regulation. The question whether a person is of hostile origin has to be determined on the facts of each case.

Norwich Prisoner (Discharge)

asked the Home Secretary if he will order the release of Thomas Crowther, No. 5467, Norwich Prison, who is undergoing his third term of imprisonment and who is reported by prison visitors to be in a serious state of health?

I received a few days ago a medical report on this case which has justified me in authorising his discharge.

Income Tax, Isle Of Man

asked the Home Secretary if friendly societies in the Isle of Man will be exempt from Income Tax if and when the new Bill becomes law?

I understand that friendly societies are not exempt from tax under the Income Tax Bill.

Travelling Post Offices (Allowances)

asked the Postmaster-General whether he is aware that men employed on travelling post offices are severely hit by the increase in the cost of food purchased away from home; whether the trade unions concerned submitted a memorial on the 29th December last; and whether, having regard to the urgency of the question and the delay which has occurred, he will do his utmost to expedite a reply?

The matter to which my hon. Friend refers has not been overlooked. My right hon. Friend hopes to be in a position to make an announcement shortly.

Living (Cost)

asked the Minister of Labour whether, in view of the time that will elapse before the Committee which was appointed in March of this year to inquire into the extent of the increase in the cost of living arising from circumstances connected with the War, and of the importance of forming some estimate in the meanwhile of the extent of such increase, and in view of the change that was made in the mode of stating the increased cost of living in the "Labour Gazette" in February of this year, he will, in order to enable a continuous com- parison to be made during the whole period of the War, furnish figures based upon the method adopted by the Board of Trade and the Ministry of Labour prior to February, 1918, as well as the figures based upon expenditure furnished by the Ministry of Food, which have been published in the "Labour Gazette" since February, 1918, giving the two sets of figures both with and without economies and substitutions, and also with regard to all items of expenditure as well as articles of food?

I am having a statement prepared which I will send to my hon. Friend in the course of a few days.

Engineering And Shipbuilding Trades (Wages Award)

asked the Minister of Labour if he is aware that the Committee on Production on 26th June heard the evidence in an application by the workmen's representatives in the engineering and shipbuilding trades for an advance of wages; that up to the present time no award has been given; if he is aware that the delay in issuing the award is causing unrest among the workmen in the trades; and can he state the reason for the delay in issuing the award?

The award to which my hon. Friend refers between the Engineering Employers' Federation and about fifty trade unions was issued on 24th July. My right hon. Friend is unaware of any unrest on the ground of alleged delay, as it is well known that these hearings take place at regular intervals with a view to changes in war wages at similar regular intervals of four months or such other dates as the tribunal may decide, in accordance with the terms of an agreement bertween the parties made in February, 1917. The last award dated from the beginning of April, and the present award is dated to take effect from early in August—that is, four months after the date of the last award.

Planting And Small Holdings, Craigmyle

asked the Secretary for Scotland what further progress, if any, has been made in the Board of Agriculture's planting and small-holdings scheme at Craigmyle; and whether, in view of the public interest of such schemes, he can now give full information on the subject, including the exact terms of the lease?

I regret that I am not yet in a position to add to the reply given to my hon. and gallant Friend on the 10th June last. Negotiations with the estate are still proceeding.

German-Owned Premises (Rent)

asked the Attorney-General whether it is compulsory for a British subject to pay rent direct to an interned German for premises owned by the German, or whether the rent may be paid either to the Public Trustee or some other official appointed by the Government?

My right hon. and learned Friend has asked me to reply to this question. The answer to the first part of the question is in the affirmative, the case being covered by the decision of the Court of Appeal in Schaffenius v. Goldberg (1916, 1 K.B. 284). As regards the second part of the question the rent due to an interned German could not be paid to the Public Trustee unless a vesting order had first been made by the Board of Trade or by the Court, vesting that enemy subject's property in the Public Trustee as custodian. There is, of course, a Proclamation prohibiting payment to enemies interned in Holland.

Ireland

Captain Bowen-Coulthurst

asked the Home Secretary whether Captain Bowen-Coulthurat was promoted after he murdered the boy Coade and Mr. Sheehy-Skeffington and two other innocent civilians, when he was sent to Newry in command of a detachment a week after these murders; whether he was, after going to Newry, placed under open arrest, and up to and during his trial he was only under open arrest; whether Mrs. Sheehy-Skeffington, the widow of one of his victims, is refused permission to return to Ireland; and, if so, what is the nature of her offence?

My right hon. Friend has asked me to reply to this question. I am sorry I cannot answer the first two parts of the question without making inquiry of the military authorities in Ireland, and this is being done. As regards the remaining parts of the question, I can add nothing to the replies given to questions on the subject on the 18th and 24th instant.

Land Purchase

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland whether he can state the date on which purchase agreements were entered into between the landlord and the tenant on the Fleming Estate, near Goleen, county Cork; whether their holdings have yet been vested in the tenants; and, if not, whether he can state the grounds of the delay and whether it is proposed to vest the holdings forthwith?

The estate referred to would appear to be that for the sale of which Major Henry Chavasse and Another instituted proceedings before the Estates Commissioners for sale direct to the tenants of their holdings under the Irish Land Act, 1903. Purchase agreements at prices agreed upon between the parties were lodged with the Commissioners on the 20th August, 1908. The estate has not yet been reached in the order of priority on the principal register of pending direct sales (all cash), and the Commissioners are not at present in a position to state when the purchase money can be advanced and the holdings vested in the tenants, but when reached in its turn the property will be dealt with as rapidly as practicable.

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland if he will state whether the Estates Commissioners propose to acquire for division amongst the uneconomic landholders in the area the lands formerly held by John Boswell, deceased, of Newtowncashel, county Longford; whether a grazing auction was held recently of this farm, thereby proving that it can be puchased for this purpose; and what steps he proposes to ask the Estates Commissioners to take in the case?

The Estates Commissioners understand that the lands are the subject of chancery proceedings in the Court of the Master of the Rolls. These lands are not pending for sale before the Estates Commissioners under the Land Purchase Acts, and they do not propose to take any action in the matter. I am informed that no grazing auction has been held recently on these lands, but on 18th inst. there was an auction of some meadow and oat crops on the lands.

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland whether any further steps have been taken by the Estates Commissioners to acquire the untenanted lands of Bawn, Moydow, county Longford, at present used as a grazing holding by the owner, Mr. H. B. Armstrong, of county Armagh; whether this gentleman was compelled to comply with the provisions of the tillage Order this year and did he do so; how many applications for allotments of this holding have the Estates Commissioners received; and when a final decision on the subject may be expected?

As regards the first part of the question, I would refer the hon. Member to the reply given to his question on this subject on the 11th December last. The Estates Commissioners have received eighty-six applications for parcels of land on this property. This estate will be dealt with in its proper order of priority. I understand that Mr. Armstrong has complied fully with the tillage Regulations.

Education (Committees Of Inquiry)

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland whether he has yet appointed the committees on primary and secondary education in Ireland; and what are the terms of reference and the personnel in each case?

The answer to the first part of the question is in the affirmative. I hope it will be possible to make an announcement as to the personnel of the Committees and the terms of reference at an early date.

Dublin Metropolitan Police

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland whether he is aware that Inspector John Purcell, C Division, is endeavouring to drive the men under him into acts of insubordination by making threats and using obscene language when the constables have, not as many summonses as he thinks they should have; whether he is aware that, when Inspector Purcell was serving in the ranks as a constable in the B Division, he was himself arrested; is he aware of the nature of the charge against him and the penalty inflicted; and will he say if such a man will be retained in control over others?

There is nothing to justify the charges made against this officer, who is, I understand, one of the most efficient officers of his rank in the Dublin Metropolitan Police. The hon. Member is under a misapprehension in thinking that this officer has ever been arrested.

Housing (Report)

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland whether he can state the cause of the delay in printing Mr. P. C. Cowan's Report on Housing in Ireland, and when it will be issued; and whether he is aware that the Association of Municipal Authorities of Ireland are anxious to have a copy for discussion at their annual conference?

It is hoped that the publication of the Report will take place very shortly.

Fish Offal

asked the Vice-President of the Department of Agriculture (Ireland) whether any steps can be taken to utilise the waste products of fish at the various Irish curing stations in Ireland; and what assistance his Department will give in the matter?

Attempts which have been made to utilise the offal from Irish fish-curing stations have received every encouragement from the Department. The only difficulty which has materially impeded the success of these attempts has been that of collecting the offal in sufficient quantity at the places where the plant has been erected.

Admiralty Craft Ratings

asked the Secretary to the Admiralty whether he is aware that in the Admiralty Replies to Petitions, 1914, page 13, it is laid down that yard craft ratings are to receive a triennial increase ranging from 2d. per day for stokers and seamen, 3d. a day for mates, and 4d. a day for engineers and masters; whether he is aware that this increase was due in October, 1917, and has not yet been paid; and whether he will cause inquiry to be made with a view to this matter being rectified as speedily as possible?

Scales of pay were laid down as stated in the first part of the question. These scales took effect from the 1st October, 1914. In December, 1916, the minimum rates for stokers and seamen were raised by another 2d. a day, and consequently it becomes necessary for the men who received these advances to serve for a further incremental period of three years from that date before receiving another advance in the existing scales. But I may add that further consideration is being given to the matter.

Small-Pox

asked the President of the Local Government Board how many cases of small-pox were notified in England and Wales in the year 1917; what was the percentage of infants vaccinated for the last year for which the records are obtainable; whether he has any information as to small-pox in Germany; and, if so, if he can say how many cases were notified in that country in 1917?

There were seven cases of small-pox notified in England and Wales in 1917. In the latest year for which complete figures are available, 50.1 per cent. of the infants born were successfully vaccinated. In regard to small-pox in Germany, I would refer the hon. Member to page 104 of the Report recently published by my Department on "the incidence of small-pox throughout the world in recent years."

Imprisoned Crofters

asked the Secretary for Scotland if he is aware that nine crofters, including two women, one of whom is a widow, were sentenced the other day to ten days' imprisonment for breach of interdict for pasturing cattle on the farm of East Garty, Portgower; whether he is aware that the extent of the holdings of these crofters is between 3 and 4 acres arable each, and that they received from the present proprietor a promise that the grazing in question would be let to them at Whit-Sunday, 1915, and will he state the reasons for the breach of this promise; whether he is aware that application was made to the Board of Agriculture for the securing of these grazings for these crofters in 1912, and will he say what was the result of the application; whether he is aware that the accused persons were summoned from their beds at five o'clock in the morning to proceed to the Court; and whether, in view of all these circumstances, he will at once order the immediate release of these people and take steps to put in force the powers he possesses under the Landholders Act in 1911 to secure for them the land in question?

The crofters in question were sentenced, the men to a fine of £5 or imprisonment for ten days, the women to 10s. or one day. Before passing sentence the sheriff allowed them an opportunity of giving an undertaking not to trespass again, but they refused to give any such undertaking. After sentence they were offered time to pay the fine, but they declined to pay at any time, and accordingly went to prison. As regards a promise from the proprietor, I can only say that I have no knowledge of any such promise. Applications were made to the Board of Agriculture for Scotland in 1912, and renewed prior to the expiration of the farm lease in 1915. They received full consideration from the Board, but, having regard to the small acreage of the farm, taken in conjunction with the limit of size for compulsory acquisition under the Landholders Act, the Board considered that it would in any case be inexpedient to break up the farm. As my hon. Friend is aware, it is undesirable to interfere with a type of holding to occupation of which small landholders may reasonably aspire. The crofters had ample opportunity to attend the Court on citation, and it was only on their deliberate failure to attend that they were arrested, brought to trial, and sentenced for contempt of Court. They were duly released on the expiry of the sentences.

Education Bill (Definition)

asked the President of the Board of Education whether the word "entertainment" in the Amendment he accepted to Sub-section (2), paragraph (3), of the Education Bill includes cinemas; and whether, thereunder, licences will be issued to children engaged in the production of cinema films?

Paragraph (3) of Sub-section (2) of Clause 13 relates to licences to take part in any entertainment or series of entertainments to take place in premises licensed according to law for public entertainments or in any circus or in any place of amusement to which the public are admitted for payment for the purpose of singing, playing, or performing or being exhibited for profit or offering anything for sale. It would be a question of fact whether any particular cinematograph entertainment falls within this description.

Reformatory School (Boys' Employment)

asked the Secretary for Scotland whether he is aware that the boys in a reformatory are employed at neighbouring works, half on day-shift and half on night-shift, and that the day-shift for the boys is frequently twelve and a half hours, i.e., three hours more than the time worked by the ordinary staff, and the night-shift thirteen hours compared with twelve hours for the ordinary workers; whether he is aware that the work they perform is not only one of the most laborious in the works, but uneducative, and that punishment for slight offences takes the form of close cropping of the hair in prison fashion; whether he is aware that the major portion of their earnings is devoted to the upkeep of the reformatory; and, seeing that employment of this character is too laborious and the working hours too long for growing lads and inconsistent with the obligations imposed upon the directors of reformatories to provide an education which shall give the inmates a proper start in life, whether he will take steps to improve the conditions under which these boys are worked?

I would refer the Noble Lord to the reply which I gave on this subject to my hon. Friend the Member for Leicester on the 15th instant. Since the date of that reply a special investigation has been made by one of the inspectors of the Reformatory and Industrial Schools Department, and I am awaiting his report.

National Expenditure

Statement By Mr Bonar Law

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer what action the Government have taken on each of the

ADMIRALTY.
Recommendations.Action taken.
Pars. 12–16.—The Royal Naval Division should be merged into the Army.The question of the merging into the Army of the Royal Naval Division is receiving the careful attention of both Departments concerned.
Par. 17.—In cases such as the change in the manufacture of naval cordite, the Admiralty, while being guided by views of their own technical officers, should also take advantage of experience and knowledge of experts not directly connected with the Admiralty.In the case referred to by the Committee the Admiralty did in fact consult a number of experts outside their Department before finally deciding the matter.
Par. 18.—Part of expenditure on charts supplied to the mercantile marine should be borne by the owners.The suggestion that part of the cost of supplying charts to the mercantile marine should be recovered by the Admiralty has been carefully considered, but for weighty reasons it has been decided that it is not desirable to make any charge for the loan of Admiralty chart sets to merchant ships.
Par. 19.—Stores should not be disposed of until other Departments have had opportunity of considering whether use can be made of them, and care should be taken that articles disposed of by sale are not directly or indirectly sold back to the Government.All lists of articles proposed for sale are referred to other Government Departments likely to be interested by the Admiralty Supply Departments in order that selection may be made of any items for further Government use. The system of transfers of all scrap material and useable articles, e.g., ships furniture fittings, etc., not required for the Royal Navy, to other Government Departments, is now so complete that only miscellaneous old stores of comparatively small value are sold to merchants, and the danger that articles disposed of by sale may be directly or indirectly repurchased by the Government appears to be eliminated.
Par 21.—Provision of fuel for the Fleet should be shown as a separate Vote.The description of Vote 8 of the Navy Estimate is "Shipbulding, Repairs, Maintenance, etc.," the three Parliamentary Votes being as stated by the Committee for "Dockyard "Work," "Personnel," "Matériel," and "Contract Work."
Fuel for the Fleet is clearly part of the material required for the maintenance of the Fleet.
The question of instituting a separate Vote for fuel is part of the larger question of the form of the National Accounts which is under the consideration of the special sub-committee of the Select Committee.
Due regard will be had to the present recommendation in considering any changes which it may be decided to make hereafter.

recommendations in the Fourth Report of this Session of the Select Committee on National Expenditure?

Recommendations.

Action taken.

On the present system the appropriation to Vote 8 of sugar freights in home-bound colliers is correct.
Par. 22.—Description of Subhead M of Vote 10 should be expanded.The description of Sub-head M of Vote 10, "-Stores, etc., to be purchased (net)," is that which appears in the abstract of the Vote (see Navy Estimates, 1914–15). A more detailed description of the Sub-head appears on page 134 of those Estimates, namely:
£
"Stores, tools, and plant to be purchased and cost of handling Deduct—
For stores to be used on works provided in other Sub-heads of this Vote, including percentage charge for handling stores and for depreciation of tools and plant
In future, subject to the observations on paragraph 21, the Sub-head in the abstract of the Vote will be expanded so as to read, "M. Stores, Tools, Plant, etc., to be purchased (net), excluding coastguard stations, etc."
OFFICE OF WORKS.
Par. 27.—Comments on the unnecessarily high standard of furniture provided, and particularly on the type of pedestal table supplied at a cost of £10 to £13 each.The Office of Works find that the criticisms of those who actually have to use the furniture supplied are generally to the effect that much of it is of too common a standard. As regards tables, pedestal tables at £10 to £13 each are supplied only to heads of Departments and other officers who have a large number of confidential papers, which must be kept under lock and key. The actual number of such tables supplied since the outbreak of war has been 2,500 only, as against 20,000 collapsible tables (for two persons) supplied at £1 each, and 20,000 leg writing tables (for two persons) at £3 10s. each.
The collapsible table was specially designed to meet the needs of the largely increased staff in various Departments, and, though demands are constantly received for tables of a superior type, the Office of Works has steadily refused to depart from the collapsible type, which has proved to be quite good enough for the purpose.
Par. 28.—Suggestion that it is unwise to spend money on new Employment Exchanges or alterations of old ones in munition areas.This matter is still under consideration between the Treasury, the Ministry of Labour, and the Office of Works.
Par 29.—Attention drawn to the rising cost of temporary buildings, and suggesting in particular that the excessive cost of a small building in the garden of 10, Downing Street, for the use of the Prime Minister'sThe provision of the building in the garden of 10, Downing Street, in the shortest possible time was stated to be imperative, and the Office of Works was not in a position to question the urgency. Every effort was, however, made to limit the cost, as far as possible, by inviting

Recommendations.

Action taken.

Secretaries—caused by orders that the building was to be completed in seven days—might have been avoided if a few extra days had been given for its completion, so as to avoid continuous night and day work.tenders in the usual way instead of giving instructions to a contractor to proceed on a prime cost basis.
Par. 31.—Attention drawn to the net loss incurred on ploughing up grass land in Richmond and Bushy Parks, and suggesting the advisability of not continuing these experiments.On the 19th December, 1916, the Prime Minister made a very grave statement in the House of Commons to the effect that "every available square yard must be made to produce food." The First Commissioner immediately took steps to consult the best agricultural expert available as to the advisability of ploughing up portions of the parks. This expert selected portions of both Richmond and Bushy Parks, and distinctly advised that they were both suitable for cultivation, although he pointed out that there was considerable risk in starting the operations so late, and that the only hope of success was to put the ploughing in hand at once, which was, in fact, done.
The financial aspect of these operations is not the only one to be considered. The First Commissioner considered that it was advisable for the Government to set an example to grass land owners to produce food. The position was very critical at that time.
The experiments cannot be judged by the results of one year only. The year 1917 was in many respects unfortunate on account of weather conditions, but the prospects of the current year are pre-eminently favourable, so far as can be seen at present.
The Office of Works consider it unwise to discontinue the cultivation of food in the parks merely because the first year did not show a financial success, especially now that considerable money has been sunk in the cultivation of the soil, purchase of implements, and fencing. Different kinds of crops, however, are being tried in both parks, more particularly at Richmond.
The Treasury have asked for detailed accounts to be prepared covering the whole period of cultivation operations.

MINISTRY OF FOOD AND BOARD OF AGRICULTURE AND FISHERIES.
Par 38.—A clear delimitation of functions should be made between the Food Ministry and the Board of Agriculture by way of agreed memorandum or otherwise, in order that divided responsibility and unnecessary expenditure of public money may be avoided.On agricultural matters, co-ordination of policy between the Board of Agriculture and Fisheries and the Ministry of Food is now obtained through the work of the recently-formed Joint Agricultural Committee. Such problems as the fixing of prices of agricultural produce necessarily involve the consideration of both Departments, and no absolute division has been found possible

Recommendations.

Action taken.

Joint Committees of officials also consider all Orders and other matters affecting the three Departments of Agriculture and the Ministry of Food.
As regards Fisheries, a Joint Committee of the two Departments has been set up by means of which questions of mutual interest can be discussed together. Analogous arrangements have been made for collaboration between the Board's officers resident on the coasts and the local officers of the Ministry of Food.

MINISTRY OF BLOCKADE.
Par. 42.—Particulars of the expenditure incurred in the operations of the Ministry of Blockade should be communicated to Parliament at a proper time.This recommendation is noted, but it is not thought that it will be possible to communicate details of the expenditure to Parliament during the War.