asked the President of the Board of Trade how much German leather has been imported to this country during this year; and if any of this is by way of reparation or indemnity?

During the first nine months of this year the registered imports of dressed leather consigned from Germany amounted to 4,571 cwts., and of undressed leather to 126 cwts. No leather has been imported by way of reparation or indemnity.

Has any German leather been prevented from coming in as part payment of the indemnity?

Perhaps my hon. Friend will give me notice of that question?

asked the President of the Board of Trade whether he has received a letter from the Association of British Chambers of Commerce drawing his attention to the delays on the part of the Board of Trade's Clearing House for enemy debts in settling the proved claims of British holders of German Government and municipal bonds and their respective unpaid coupons; and whether he will now recognise the advantage of taking these particular British claims out of the hands of the Board of Trade's Clearing House at Stamford Street, S.E., and entrusting them to the Bankers' Clearing House, in view of the fact that the British joint stock banks are familiar with the process of identifying, verifying, and encashing foreign Government municipal bonds and coupons, and, therefore, more able to wind up, without further delay, a position which a Government Department is apparently unable to handle expeditiously, notwithstanding the fact that the monetary instruments in question are of such a kind that confirmation by the German Clearing House is un necessary?

The reply to the first part of the question is in the affirmative. As regards the second part, I think the inquiry of my Noble Friend is based upon a misapprehension. Although the British Clearing Office makes a preliminary examination of claims filed with them before transmitting them to the German Office, it is the latter which is concerned to satisfy itself completely as to the validity of the claim before admitting the debt as due through the Clearing Offices, and it is not practicable, therefore, to place the examination of claims of the nature referred to in the question in the hands of the Bankers' Clearing House. Nor is it the case that the examination of such claims by the German Office is a mere formality, since it is necessary to verify in every case that the holder of the bonds or coupons at the coming into force of the Treaty of Peace fulfils the requirements of the Treaty provisions in respect of nationality and place of residence, and that the bonds or coupons had not been transferred during the War.

asked the President of the Board of Trade what the percentage proportion is of repayment out of the total monetary amount of British claims lodged with the British Clearing House, Stamford Street, up to 15th August, 1920; what in particular is the monetary percentage of repayment of claims with respect to British-held German Government and municipal securities and their unpaid overdue coupons; and when it is proposed to give a definite date for repayment of the remaining claims?

The amount already paid to British creditors by the British Clearing Office is about 12 per cent. of the total face value of British claims lodged with that Office up to the 15th August. The latter total includes all claims whether admissible or not. I regret that it would not be possible to ascertain the percentage in the case of the particular class of claim referred to in the second part of the question without the expenditure of a great deal of time and labour. In reply to the third part of the question, it is not possible to give a definite date at which the outstanding claims, so far as admitted or found due, will be ready for payment. As I have just explained to the Noble Lord the Member for Battersea, it is necessary to afford due opportunity for the verification of these claims, and some of them may of course have to go for settlement before the Mixed Arbitral Tribunal.

asked the President of the Board of Trade if the Government is now prepared to introduce a Bill with the object of giving adequate protection to key industries and also to control dumping?

A Bill dealing with these matters is in course of preparation and will, I hope, be introduced this Session.

Can the hon. Gentleman give a definite date when this Bill will be introduced?

I am sure my hon. Friend will appreciate that it is quite impossible for me to give a definite date. The Board of Trade are anxious to proceed with the Bill, but it is quite obvious that we have not control of Parliamentary time.

Will the hon. Gentleman be able to give an answer if the question is repeated this day week?

A question of that kind ought to be addressed to the Leader of the House.

asked the President of the Board of Trade whether he has considered the letter from the Federation of British Industries, of which extracts appeared in the Press on 19th October, with regard to certain modifications which appear desirable in the export credit scheme undertaken by the Government; and whether, in the interests of British industry, he is prepared to adopt the recommendations contained in the letter?

My attention has been drawn to the letter in question, and I need hardly say that I am glad to take into consideration any views expressed by the Federation of British Industries. I should explain that the whole question of facilitating the utilisation of the export credits scheme has been under consideration for some time past. The Board of Trade have especially been in communication with the Treasury in regard to the proposal that the percentage of the cost of the goods to be advanced to the exporter should be increased from 80 per cent. to 100 per cent., which is referred to in the federation's letter, and I am glad to be able to inform the House that sanction has now been given for this increase in the proportion to be advanced, subject to recourse remaining as heretofore against the exporter in respect of 20 per cent. I will carefully examine the, other suggestions put forward by the Federation, but it would appear that some of these are based on misapprehensions as to the conditions governing this scheme.

Can the hon. Gentleman say how far the communications from the Federation of British Industries control the policy of His Majesty's Government?

I can assure my hon. Friend that this matter was under consideration for months before any letter appeared from the Federation of British Industries, and a decision was taken entirely irrespective of the letter which appeared in the Press from the Federation of British Industries. I am bound to add that I am satisfied that the decision arrived at is a right one by the fact that it is supported by such a large number of manufacturers and traders in this country.

asked the President of the Board of Trade whether he is aware that several European countries, including Portugal, Roumania, Germany, Norway and Poland, have prohibited the importation of silk goods, with the result that not only are British manufacturers unable to send silk goods to these markets, but that foreign-made silk goods which would normally go to those markets are being sent into this country at dumped prices; whether he is aware that there is serious unemployment and under employment (short time) in the silk industry in this country; and what steps he proposes to take to meet these conditions?

I am aware that the importation of silk goods into the countries in question is prohibited, but I cannot say to what extent this may be a contributory cause of the considerable importation of silk goods into the United Kingdom which has taken place in recent months. I do not think that any useful purpose would be served by efforts to secure the abolition of the prohibitions which have been imposed by the countries concerned with a view to restricting expenditure abroad on luxury goods. I am aware that the conditions of employment in the silk trade in the United Kingdom at present are far from satisfactory, and I am arranging for the reception of a deputation from the Joint Industrial Council of the silk industry, when the reasons and remedies for this situation will no doubt be discussed.

Is it not a fact that there is a duty of 60 per cent. in the United States on imported silk fabrics going to that country, and that many hundreds of thousands of yards of silk fabrics made in the United States were imported into this country during the past year; and does the hon. Gentleman not think that here is a case where steps should be taken to remedy a preventible cause of unemployment in this country?

I am not sure that I followed the object of the question; but it is obvious that it would be improper for me in answer to a supplementary question to discuss the possibility of imposing a tariff in this country.

Is not the mere fact of our not being able, owing to the American duty of 60 per cent., to send silk fabrics to America a reason why the importation from America into this country of hundreds of thousands of yards of manufactured silk should be prevented?

I am quite aware of the facts, but in dealing with a question of this kind we must not overlook the effect of the rate of exchange between this country and America.

Notwithstanding the possibly valid reason which the hon. Gentleman has given, what is to become of the poor girls and women who are thrown out of work in Yarmouth and Norwich?

I think we should have an opportunity of meeting the President of the Board of Trade and discussing this when there is more time for it.

Where has the cheap suit business disappeared to?

It is quite obvious that I have not got the particulars of every commodity.

asked the President of the Board of Trade whether, in view of the statements made that owners are working narrow and more difficult seams until control is abolished, the Government will take steps to obtain more definite information in regard to the localities referred to with a view to instructing the departmental inspectors of the Mines Department to report as to the accuracy or otherwise of these statements?

I still hope for the establishment of machinery within the industry for dealing with questions of this kind as soon as the present dispute is ended.

asked the President of the Board of Trade, having regard to the statement made that as a result of the Government not carrying out in toto the Majority Report of the Sankey Commission the miners are not prepared to accept the offer of a tribunal, whether he will give an assurance that the award of such a tribunal would be equally binding on both parties and would be accepted and acted upon by the Government?

Full assurances were given by the Government to the Executive Committee of the Miners' Federation that any decision given as to wages by any such tribunal would be accepted and carried out by the Government, and I do not think there can be any real misapprehension on the subject.

asked the Prime Minister whether the appeal by Earl Haig, in connection with the coal strike, has been issued at public expense; what is the expenditure involved in this and other publicity for the Government case; and whether a special tax is to be levied on coal owners to meet these costs, or whether the general public is to bear the cost of their defence?

I have been asked to reply. The appeal by Earl Haig has not been issued at the public expense. The expense incidental to the publicity which the Government consider desirable to undertake in the public interest will be paid for out of public funds. Such publicity is not undertaken in defence of the coal owners, but of the community at large.

Is the hon. and gallant Gentleman aware that in the minds of a very large number of organised workers of this country, the appeal issued by Earl Haig is an incitement to people to blackleg the miners?

I am not responsible for the message, but I have seen it, and I cannot conceive how any reasonable person could put such a construction on it.

I do, anyhow.

asked the President of the Board of Trade what measures are being taken to deal with mines in the Galston area rendered unworkable by the recent floods.

Notwithstanding the serious difficulties to be overcome, good progress is being made with the work of pumping out the accumulation of water and repairing the damage done to the surface works and shafts. The Mines Department have been in close touch with the situation from the outset, and are lending all the assistance in their power towards expediting the reopening of the mines.

Can the hon. Gentleman tell us whether there will be a large pumping station which will meet the needs of the area?

I do not know whether the arrangements have got as far as that, but I will inquire and let my hon. Friend know.

asked whether the mine owners are guaranteed their standard profits without any deduction in respect of the loss incurred by the cessation of work in the mines during the present dispute?

No, Sir. Mine owners will not receive their standard profits unless the aggregate profits of the industry are sufficient for this purpose. The guarantee given by The Coal Mines (Emergency) Act, 1920, that, in the event of the total profits of the industry being reduced below nine-tenths of the total standard profits, the reduction should be made good, only applies if and in so far as that reduction may have been caused by any order, regulation, or direction issued by the Controller, or by the Board of Trade, after the 1st January, 1920.

asked the Prime Minister whether something can be done to reduce to the barest minimum necessary the consumption of coal for pumping and the production of electricity and gas?

I have been asked to reply to this question. Orders have been issued, summaries of which have been published in the Press, drastically restricting the consumption of coal generally. Further restrictions will be brought into operation if and when necessary.

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that, for instance, in such places as Kingston this week-end, although sunset was at 5.45, all the lights were on at 5.15?

That ought to have been referred by the Noble Lord to the local authority on the spot.

He has been reported too often himself.

Will the right hon. Gentleman consider the advisability of issuing a note to local authorities that they should make another appeal to users of electricity to curtail their requirements as much as possible?

I think that as a whole people are fully aware of the necessities of the case. There is a Committee sitting representing the Metropolitan area, and I shall be very glad to call their attention to the apprehension to which reference is made.

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that the members of that Committee are divided in opinion on the subject and that some of them say they have four months' supply, if they are allowed to go on?

I do not think the Committee have any division of opinion. Of course, everybody has a difference of opinion about a subject on which nobody has certain information as to the figures.

asked the Prime Minister whether, having regard to the importance of securing a larger output of coal, he will cause an impartial tribunal to be formed for the purpose of inquiring into and reporting upon the reasons for the decreased output as compared with the pre-War period?

The discussions, with a view to the settlement of the coal dispute, have been based on the assumption that there will be joint examination and co-operation between the coal-owners and the miners, with a view to securing the maximum output. I hope, therefore, that the suggestion contained in the question will not be necessary.

asked the President of the Board of Trade if, in view of the fact that the accuracy of the figures submitted by the Government in regard to the cost of living have not been accepted by a large section of the miners, the Government will appoint an independent Committee of the House to verify their accuracy or otherwise?

I have been asked to reply. I am sending my hon. and gallant Friend an extract from the "Labour Gazette" for March last, which explains in detail the methods employed in compiling the statistics relating to cost of living which are prepared each month in the Ministry of Labour. I am aware that it has been asserted, on the one hand, that the actual increase is greater, and, on the other hand, that it is less, than the published percentage, but the evidence adduced has, I am advised, been fragmentary, and no independent statistics have been compiled of a sufficiently comprehensive character to provide a justification for disputing the official calculations. As regards the suggestion that an independent Committee should be appointed to verify the accuracy of the statistics, my hon. and gallant Friend will no doubt be aware that these statistics were the subject of an investigation in 1918 by Lord Sumner's Committee on the Cost of Living, who reported that there was every reason to suppose that they were accurate and adequate for their purpose.

That was 1918. It is two years later now.

Can the hon. Gentleman explain how you get the information upon which the Board of Trade figures of the cost of living are based?

The figures are got together by a process of examination of a large number of details and a large amount of data from various sources. If the hon. Member likes I will furnish him with such published information as there is bearing an the method by which the figures are arrived at.

Does the hon. Member ever consult the wives of the working men as to the cost of living?

asked the President of the Board of Trade whether he has yet finished his inquiry into the profits made by the Bell Spinning Company, as promised on the 10th May last; and, if so, with what results?

An investigation has been made by the Standing Committee on Prices of the Central Committee under the Profiteering Acts into the trading accounts, profit and loss accounts and balance sheets of the Bell Cotton Spinning Company and the Times Spinning Company. Pending the result of investigation into a number of other cotton spinning companies, the Central Committee have not expressed any opinion as to the reasonableness or otherwise of the profits made by these two companies.

asked how many Reports have been published as the result of investigations into prices, costs and profits by the Central Committee and sub-committees set up under the Profiteering Act; what have been the main recommendations of the Report in each case; and in how many cases these recommendations have been carried out?

Eleven Reports of investigations by the Standing Committee on Prices of the Central Committee, or by Sub-committees of the Standing Committee on Prices, into prices, costs and profits have been published, besides two Reports of investigations by a joint Sub-committee of the Standing Committees on Prices and Trusts. I am sending my hon. Friend copies of these Reports, which have been presented to Parliament, and he will see that in the great majority of cases no recommendations for specific action are made, but the findings are mainly on questions of fact. Recommendations for specific action are contained in the Reports of the Matches Sub-committee and the Motor Fuel Sub-committee. The Matches Report recommended that efforts should be made to secure adequate supplies of suitable timber for the matchmaking industry; and the attention of the Departments concerned has been drawn to this recommendation. The Motor Fuel Report, among other recommendations, suggested that maximum prices should be fixed, that the Government should control production and distribution, and that every possible means should be used to foster the production of power alcohol and facilitate its distribution. With regard to the question of action on these recommendations, I would refer my hon. Friend to the reply given on 21st October to the hon. Member for East Nottingham.

Arising out of the answer which I did not hear, are we to understand that the recommendations of these various committees have been acted upon?

As I have stated, the majority of the Reports do not contain any recommendations of specific action. In two cases in which specific action was recommended the Departments concerned have been notified in one case, and the other case was dealt with fully in the answer to my hon. Friend a few days ago.

asked the President of the Board of Trade whether he is aware of the shortage of cement which Is delaying the completion of many large road undertakings and throwing considerable numbers of men out of employment; whether he can give any explanation as to why this material is not available for all works of public utility; and if he will take action in the interests of the unemployed and public authorities?

I am aware of the present serious shortage of cement, which I understand is due to the difficulties experienced by the makers in respect of the supply of plant, fuel, and materials. I am causing the whole position to be investigated, but as at present advised I fear that any improvement in output can only be very gradual.

asked the President of the Board of Trade whether export licences are still being refused for goods destined for Soviet Russia; and, if so, on what legal grounds is this being done without a declaration of war or blockade?

Export licences are still being refused for the shipment of goods to Russia. The legal authority for the existing prohibitions of export of goods to certain destinations without licence is Section 1 of the Customs (Exportation Restrictions) Act, 1914.

Can the hon. Gentleman inform me why his Department hamper British trade in this way, in view of the fact that there is considerable trade going on between Sweden and other neutrals and Soviet Russia; and why does he prevent British merchants doing trade in a country with whom we are not at war?

The House has been fully informed on many occasions, both of the views and policy of His Majesty's Government, and also of the views of the hon. and gallant Member.

On the 7th July last, did we not agree to permit trading relations being resumed with Russia; and, in view of that fact, is not this a distinct breach of faith, as great as any breach of faith, with Russia?

That is a singularly inaccurate description of the proposal which was put forward. The policy of His Majesty's Government was stated a day or two ago by the Leader of the House in reply to a question, and I have nothing to add to that.

Is it not a fact that the leaders of trade in this country decline to do business at all with Russia until they honour their pre-War debts?

I can assure the hon. Member that all the matters mentioned have been fully considered.

Is it accurate to say that there are firms in this country who have already made large contracts wit)'. Soviet Russia to the extent of £2,000,000?

It is quite obvious that I cannot answer a question of that kind without notice. If my hon. Friend wishes to have specific facts relating to any transaction, I will endeavour to answer him.

asked the Prime Minister what is the present position with reference to the British officers, men and civilians held prisoner in Russia by the Soviet Government; and whether it is proposed to allow Krassin and the personnel of the Russian trade and other delegations to remain in this country unless the release of these prisoners is immediately effected?

This question was answered on Thursday last and. appears in the OFFICIAL REPORT of that date.

May I ask the right hon. Gentleman whether he has any more recent information, and whether he can tell us whether the Russian trade delegation is to remain hero indefinitely, while our prisoners are detained?

Is it not a fact that the right hon. Gentleman himself stated in this House three months ago that no negotiations of any description would take place with Russia until these men were released, and that that was cheered to the echo in this House, and has he broken his word, or have circumstances altered?

I do not think the hon. Gentleman should assume that I have broken my word. I gave my pledge to the House that there would be no negotiations, and there will be no negotiations, until these men have been released.

What steps are actually being taken to get these men back from Russia?

That has already been repeatedly stated in this House, and I have nothing to add.

asked the President of the Board of Trade whether, in view of the lapsing of the provisions of the Wages (Temporary Regulation) Act on 30th September last, he proposes to. introduce legislation to take its place.

In reply to a question put on 4th August by my hon. Friend the Member for Eastbourne, my right hon. Friend outlined the policy of the Government on this matter and stated that it was not proposed to continue this Act beyond 30th September. The Act has now expired. On 5th October, however, my right hon. Friend the Member for Miles Platting brought to my right hon. Friend a representative deputation of trade unionists interested in this question, who urged that the Act should be extended for a time, at any rate as regards women workers, until the contemplated increase in the number of trade boards had taken place. My right hon. Friend has since had an opportunity of discussing the question with a representative group of employers, and is informed by them that they do not wish the Act to be continued under any circumstances. My right hon. Friend the Member for Miles Platting made a further suggestion that my right hon. Friend should call a joint conference between the parties. When this suggestion was put to the employers, they reminded him that the employers' representatives have at all times been prepared to meet the unions concerned, and this information was conveyed to my right hon. Friend the Member for Miles Platting.

asked the President of the Board of Trade whether his attention has been called to the recommendation of the Indian and Ceylon Tea Association that production be curtailed so that there may be a recovery in prices; and whether he will recommend that a commission be appointed to inquire into the various efforts which are being made by owners to restrict output?

I have been asked to reply. The answer to the first part of the question is in the affirmative. For some time past large quantities of Indian and Ceylon tea have been sold at prices considerably below the cost of production, owing to the serious decrease in the demand for tea from Russia and other Continental countries. The Food Controller does not consider at present that it is necessary to adopt the course indicated in the last, part of the question.

asked the Minister of Health whether the use of a room in public buildings, the property of the ratepayers, has been refused to representatives of Government Departments entrusted with the duty of securing and regulating the supply of food to the community, and what action he proposes to take.

I have only seen newspaper reports of these cases. In the absence of special legislation the disposal of accommodation in buildings the property of a local authority is a matter within the discretion of the authority.

asked the Prime Minister which department and/or departments of the Government are responsible for the British administration in Mesopotamia; and if His Majesty's Government have yet decided when they propose to fulfil their pledge of granting self-government to the Arabs in Mesopotamia?

The administration of Mesopotamia is conducted by the High Commissioner, acting, for the present, under the instructions of the Secretary of State for India. As regards the second part of the question, as my right hon. Friend the Lord Privy Seal informed the House on the 19th October, the new High Commissioner (Sir Percy Cox) only arrived in Mesopotamia on the 4th October. It appears necessary to await his recommendations before making a statement as to the next step to be taken to give effect to the fixed policy of His Majesty's Government of setting up an Arab State in Mesopotamia.

Is the arrangement whereby High Commissioners in Mesopotamia are responsible to the Secretary of State for India and to the Government of India to be permanent?

I hope not.

asked what is the full scope of the powers and instructions given to Sir Percy Cox; if any preliminary Report has yet been received from him; and, if not, whether, in view of the unsatisfactory state of affairs in Mesopotamia, he will cable Sir Percy Cox to at once submit a preliminary Report?

Sir Percy Cox was not furnished with precise instructions, but he was given a wide discretion to frame proposals for giving effect as soon as possible to the policy of His Majesty's Government of setting up an Arab State in Mesopotamia. With regard to the second and third parts of the question, I have nothing to add to the answer given on the 19th October in reply to a question by the hon. Member for Whitechapel.

asked the Prime Minister whether Sir Percy Cox, as High Commissioner for Mesopotamia, is under the direction and control of the War Office, the India Office, or the Foreign Office; whether the Middle Eastern Committee of the Cabinet still exists, and, if so, who composes it, and is it responsible for decisions of policy and issuing directions to the High Commissioners of Mesopotamia, Palestine, Egypt, and Aden; whether it is proposed to create a Middle Eastern Department, either under the Colonial Office or India Office, or under a separate Minister; whether all British officials appointed to mandatory areas in the Middle East will in future be appointed by and receive their instructions from the Colonial Office, the India Office, or the Foreign Office; and to whom will the High Commissioners report?

Sir Percy Cox, as High Commissioner for Mesopotamia, remains for the present under the direction and control of the Secretary of State for India, who, in all matters of importance, acts in close consultation with the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs. A Committee composed of the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, the Secretary of State for India, and attended by representatives of the Admiralty, War Office, India Office, Foreign Office, and, when necessary, the Treasury, meets from time to time to secure co-ordination between the various Departments, and to give advice to His Majesty's Government on Middle Eastern affairs. The creation of a Middle Eastern Department is under the consideration of His Majesty's Government, but no decision has yet been reached.

asked the Prime Minister if he will state at what intervals the variable scales of pay of civil servants are revised in accordance with the cost of living index figures; when the last revision took place; what are the present additions to the pre-War scale; and whether the percentage increases apply to all civil servants or only to those with salaries under a certain figure?

With the permission of the hon. and gallant Member, the answer will be published in the OFFICIAL REPORT.

asked whether the British and Turkish Governments have exchanged ratifications of the Treaty of Peace with Turkey; whether a de facto Turkish Government, which does not recognise the authority or orders of the Sultan's Government in Constantinople, remains in Asia Minor, and over what area does this Government's authority extend; whether this Government in Asia Minor is refusing to carry out the terms of the Peace Treaty; if so, what steps are being taken to enforce the Treaty; and whether this Government in Asia Minor is in alliance with the Government at Moscow and acts under the orders of Moscow?

Neither Government has yet ratified the Treaty, but a Bill for that purpose has been drafted and will be introduced in this House at a very early date. The so-called Nationalist Government of Angora claims authority over North, Central and Eastern Anatolia, but such authority as it possesses is maintained by force and is to a large extent resisted by the inhabitants. The Angora Government does not recognise the Peace Treaty, but as ratification has not yet taken place, no enforcement of its terms upon the Nationalists has hitherto been called for. It is certain that the Nationalists are in communication with the Soviet Government, and an alliance between the two is said to have been concluded.

Is there any inducement to patriotic Turks to attempt to carry out such a Peace Treaty as is being imposed on Turkey? Is not our peace simply asking for an alliance between Moscow and the Angora Government?

No. I think that the terms of the Treaty are exceedingly fair and certainly better than Turkey had a right to expect after the way she treated Britain and the other Allies.

asked the Prime Minister when it is intended to lay the Hungarian and Turkish Treaties of Peace before Parliament?

It is intended to introduce the Bill dealing with both Treaties as soon as possible during the present Session.

Would the right hon. Gentleman say when it is intended to lay the Treaty with Turkey before the House, or where hon. Members can get a copy? It has not yet been published.

I will inquire.

asked the Prime Minister whether the trial of enemy criminals has yet been commenced: and, if so, with what result?

I have been asked to reply to this question. I would refer the hon. and gallant Member to the answer given by my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer on Thursday last to questions on this subject.

Can the right hon. Gentleman say if it is owing to delay on the part of the German Government that these trials have not taken place?

I do not think it is true to say that there has been any delay on the part of the German Government since the Spa Conference. With regard to what happened before that, the hon. Member is as well aware as I am.

How many of these Germans will be available if and when we are able to secure their trial?

I cannot say.

Good job they are not the Lord Mayor of Cork!

Has not the time come when it would be compatible with the dignity of the British Government to say that there is not now, and never was, any intention that these men should be tried?

No, it cannot be compatible with anyone's dignity to make a statement which is manifestly untrue.

asked the Prime Minister whether there is any British representative or liaison official at Beyrout and Damascus, respectively, whether he can give any information regarding the political and military situation in Syria; whether he has received from the Emir Feisal or King Hussein of the Hedjaz any representation regarding the carrying out by the British Government of the undertaking given to the latter of the pledges given by them before the Arabs entered the War as our allies; and, if so, what reply has been sent to the Emir Feisal or King Hussein?

His Majesty's Government are represented by a Consul-General at Boyrout, and it is intended to appoint a Consul to Damascus shortly. I have no recent information as to the military or political situation in Syria to give to the House. Several communications have been received from King Hussein and the Emir Feisal on the subject of the negotiations referred to. His Majesty's Government do not admit that they have failed to carry out any pledges then given. Both King Hussein and the Emir when he was here have been informed that there is no question of His Majesty's Government departing from the obligations entered into by them.

asked the Prime Minister whether His Majesty's Government intended, under Article X. of the Covenant of the League of Nations, to recognise and guarantee the eastern frontiers of Poland as drawn in the Russo-Polish Treaty of Riga?

The question cannot arise until a Treaty has been signed and ratified by the two countries concerned, and has been registered with the Secretariat of the League in accordance with Article 18 of the Covenant.

Would the right hon. Gentleman say whether we have led the Polish Government to believe that we will guarantee in any way such a Treaty as they have drawn at Riga?

asked the Prime Minister what are the measures proposed to replace the existing Liquor Control Board relating to the supply of intoxicants, which expires on 25th October; and whether he will respond to the widespread appeal of workmen's organisations to retain the present Sunday hours in the evening, but to bring forward the morning opening and closing, namely, 12 a.m. to 2 p.m., or 12.30 p.m. to 2.30 p.m., as the Sunday dinner is the principal meal of the week?

asked the Prime Minister whether his attention has been called to the dissatisfaction that exists amongst members of working men's clubs by reason of the proposed alteration of the hours of opening for the sale of liquor in such clubs on Sundays to 6 p.m. to 9 p.m., whereas at present the hours of opening are 7 p.m. to 10 p.m.; what substantial grounds, if any, for such alteration exist; and whether he will give directions to the Central Control Board (Liquor Traffic) to rescind their order for this alteration?

asked the Lord Privy Seal whether he is aware of the discontent arising from the reported decision to revert to the former hours of opening and closing of licensed premises on Sunday evenings; and whether he will state the reasons for such decision?

I shall answer these questions together. I have nothing to add to the reply given by my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer on Thursday last in answer to a question by the right hon. Member for East Woolwich and to the reply given to the hon. Member for Dartford on the 21st July.

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that the churches are in favour of the alteration of the Sunday hours from 7 to 10 o'clock?

indicted dissent.

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that there is a very wide feeling of dissatisfaction at the compulsory change of hours, and that the present hours are most suitable in every way?

May I ask whether the Prime Minister would consult the representatives of working-class organisations knowing working-class habits, with a view, not to extending the hours, but to making them more in conformity with the wishes of the people?

The general belief is that the policy of the Government is gradually to force this country to become dry. Will the right hon. Gentleman state whether that is or is not the policy of the Government?

I can assure my hon. Friend that there are a good many people who take exactly the opposite view.

Are they right?

With regard to the other questions, I have had many representations, both orally and in writing, on the subject, and I am fully alive to the fact that the whole position ought to be reviewed. We were in hopes of bringing in a Bill to deal with the matter, and we have got it ready, but one thing and another makes it very difficult to attend to these questions. There are other much more urgent questions being thrust upon us for consideration, and therefore we are quite unable to give that attention to this question which, I agree, its importance demands.

Will the right hon. Gentleman consider the matter between now and next Sunday—the whole thing could be done in about five minutes—and will he advise the Central Control Board to maintain the present order so far as Sunday evening opening is concerned?

May I ask whether the future policy of the Government, as evidenced by their Bill, is to increase or decrease the present restrictions on the sale of alcohol?

Is it possible to postpone the coming into force of this new Sunday Order until the right hon. Gentleman has had time to give the matter consideration?

I will communicatc that suggestion to those who have the matter in charge, and I will see what can be done.

Will the right hon. Gentleman say whether he can do what he did last Session, namely, appoint a small Committee of hon. Members to report to him and advise him on the subject?

I will see.

asked the Prime Minister whether he is aware of the way in which the liberty of the citizens of North Bucks and elsewhere is curtailed and threatened by the activities of the Central Control Board (Liquor Traffic), and that the Board's regulations affect various clubs, often in the same locality, in totally different ways; and if he will say when this Board will be abolished so that every club throughout the country may have the same privileges and liberties?

On the question of differentiation raised in the first part of the question, I would refer the hon. and gallant Member to the answer given on 24th June to the hon. Member for North Dorset, and as regards the latter part of the question, to the answer given to the hon. Member for Woolwich on Thursday last.

asked the Prime Minister whether he is aware that property to the value of many millions of pounds has been insured in Ireland against loss arising from riot, civil commotion, or action by the forces of the Crown; is he aware that none of these risks is covered by ordinary policies of insurance, that the rates quoted for them by underwriters are extremely onerous, and in the majority of cases prohibitive; and, seeing that the Government is alone able to estimate the risks to which property in Ireland is exposed, can he inaugurate a scheme of Government insurance for Ireland similar to that undertaken with such success during the War?

I have no information as to the amount of the insurances referred to in the first part of the question. It is I believe the case that the risks mentioned are not covered by ordinary policies of insurance, but the Government is not prepared to inaugurate a scheme of State insurance to cover such risks.

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that there is a very great deal of apprehension in Ireland in reference to this, and that many millions of pounds have already been effected in insurance of this class of risk? Is he further aware that in this country there is a considerable demand for the same class of insurance, although, of course, in a minor form?

I am aware of all the apprehensions in Ireland.

We ask you to protect us from them.

asked the Prime Minister whether soft-nosed or other expanding bullets have been employed in Ireland in the attacks on police or military, or have been found on persons on being arrested; and, if so, whether notice will be given that in accordance with the practice obtaining in warfare any one illegally using or being found in possession of such ammunition shall, on conviction, be liable to the death penalty?

The answer to the first part of the question is in the affirmative, and to the latter part of the question in the negative.

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that during the South African War, which was, after all, far more than a revolt against us, and was war properly so called, the British leaders issued such a notice which had a material effect in checking the use of expanding bullets by certain members of the Boer forces?

I am fully aware of that, but the state of war which existed in South Africa does not now exist in Ireland. It would be necessary either to pass legislation or declare martial law in order to treat those found with such ammunition in the mariner suggested.

Are the soldiers serving in Ireland considered to be on active service?

That is a matter for the Secretary of State for War, who is considering it from the point of view of the soldier.

asked the Prime Minister whether he will now publish the documents found in the possession of the present leaders of Sinn Fein in 1918, which showed that there was an arrangement between these leaders and the Germans to attack us in 1918?

The Government consider that it is desirable that these documents should be published, provided that it can be done without giving away the source of the Government's information. The matter is now under consideration.

Does the Prime Minister still say that there was a plot in 1918 to give Germany help in Ireland?

Certainly.

Has the right hon. Gentleman's attention been drawn to the evidence of the facts by Colonel Repington in his Memoirs in this matter?

asked the Prime Minister if, following the precedents of the Hunter and Milner Commissions, a Commission will later proceed to Ireland to inquire into the nature, causes, and extent of the outrages and reprisals committed there?

I can add nothing to the statements made by my right hon. Friend the Leader of the House in the course of the Debate last Wednesday.

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that statements were made with regard to specific points, and that all the statements were pressing for an immediate inquiry?

There was a very full opportunity afforded. The Debate extended over a whole evening, and I think the whole ground was covered

Does that mean there will be no Commission?

(by Private Notice) asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland

I only received this question and the question of the hon. Member for the Falls Division (Mr. Devlin) at a quarter to two. I respectfully ask hon. Members who put down Private Notice questions to give me a little more time.

I regret the notice was so short. As a matter of fact, I sent my private notice question at one o'clock.

Did you not see it in this morning's papers? It could have been read there!

Naturally I desire to give the latest official information that I can to hon. and right hon. Gentlemen who ask for it, but it is necessary usually to communicate with Dublin Castle, and it may be other Government Departments in different parts of Ireland, and it is very difficult to do this within three hours. I have, however, with the desire, but not with the hope, of making a satisfactory reply, drawn up this answer: I have no convincing evidence of the flogging and wounding of several men in the West of Ireland. I have no knowledge of incendiary fires and indiscriminate shootings in Dublin, Athlone, and Bandon, but I am making inquiries. I have seen the report of the speech alleged to have been made by Governor Cox, and he obviously obtained his information from those hostile to the British Empire and to Anglo-American friendship. I believe the world is horrified at the murders of policemen and soldiers in Ireland, and I do not believe the world accepts the malignant untruths suggested in the question. The hon. Gentleman and the House will share with me the regret at the murder of two soldiers of the Essex Regiment, and the wounding of six more soldiers of the same regiment, in an ambush near Bandon on the 22nd instant.

Does the right hon. Gentleman assert that the representatives of the "Manchester Guardian," the "Times," and other English newspapers are enemies of the British Empire?

I do not say it, and I do not assert it.

May I ask if the right hon. Gentleman is aware that clear, precise, and specific charges of this character have been made by these English representatives of the great English journals and they have been published in this country: therefore, if he states that all who make these charges are enemies of the British Empire, does he declare that these gentlemen are enemies of the British Empire?

I have answered that.

asked the Chief Secretary for Ireland whether the announcement is authoritative that the Government intend to employ as special constables in the North of Ireland members of the Ulster Volunteers, and whether during the recent disturbances in Belfast one of these special constables was convicted of looting a Catholic house; whether at Lisburn 300 special constables have already resigned their positions because a number of their colleagues have been convicted of looting Catholic houses: whether this scheme has been undertaken by the Government, to arm the men who organised and carried out the pogrom against Belfast Catholic workmen, and who have expelled 4,000 Catholic workmen from their employment; whether Parliament will be given an opportunity of discussing this organised conspiracy to place the lives, liberties, and property of 500,000 Catholics at the mercy of their political opponents armed by the British Government?

As has already been announced, the Government has decided to enroll well-disposed citizens in the special constabulary to assist the police in the preservation of peace. The enrolment is not confined to Ulster. It is true that three special constables have been committed for trial at Belfast on charges of looting, two being now on bail and one in custody. The strictest discipline, which is characteristic of the Royal Irish Constabulary, which this special constabulary is to assist, and under which it has to serve, will be carried out in the case of the special constabulary. It is true that some hundred special constables in Lisburn threatened to resign as the result of the charge against the three special constables, but did not do so. I can assure the hon. Gentleman that the desire of the Government in enrolling the special constables is to obtain all possible help in restoring normal conditions in Ireland. There is, of course, no discrimination whatever against Roman Catholics. They will be welcomed to the Force. Some, indeed, have already joined.

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that over five weeks ago, before this policy of enrolling special constables was authoritatively announced by the Government, that an announcement was made at a meeting of those who organised this pogrom, that this was to be the policy of the Government. It was announced by the gentleman who organised the pogrom against the Catholics of Belfast. Is the Chief Secretary not aware of that?

No, I am not aware of that.

The right hon. Gentleman can read the newspapers. The right hon. Gentleman can get a report of the speech. [HON. MEMBRES: "Order, order!"] Order yourselves! We have not got the "Black and Tans" yet in the House of Commons, though we have the savages!

I must ask the hon. Gentleman to put what he has to say in interrogative form.

Yes, Sir. I want to ask the right hon. Gentleman whether his attention has been called to a speech of the leader of this pogrom by which four or five thousand innocent men have been driven from their employment—I mean of the gentleman who announced the Government's policy five weeks ago before it was ever mentioned authoritatively by Dublin Castle or the Chief Secretary? How did this gentleman get to know what was the intention of the Government in organising the special constables to exterminate the Catholics of Belfast?

I have no knowledge of the facts as set out by the hon. Gentleman. The question of enrolling special constables has engaged the attention of the Irish Government for many months past. I myself have never seen why well-disposed citizens should not be enrolled in the support of their own homes and with their fellow-citizens in support of the community in which they live, against anyone wishful to disturb the peace.

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that in order to maintain law and order in three provinces of Ireland he has turned that country into a veritable hell? Why in doing so are the forces of the Crown not sufficient without bringing in the political partisans and opponents of the Nationalists? Why are the forces of the Crown not engaged solely without the introduction of these elements in maintaining law and order in the other province in Ireland?

I beg to ask leave to move the Adjournment of the House for the purpose of discussing a definite matter of urgent public importance, namely, the renewal, since the last Debate in the House, of a policy of frightfulness in Ireland by indiscriminate shootings, by floggings, by incendiary fires, and by arming of Orange volunteers in Ulster as special constables.

asked the Prime Minister if the Government will consider claims for compensation for the destruction of property in Ireland by servants of the Crown?

The liability to pay compensation for malicious injuries is laid by law upon the local authority irrespective of the agency by which the injuries are inflicted, and the Government cannot at the present time undertake to relieve local authorities of any part of their liability. The Government are prepared to consider on its merits any hard case of an innocent sufferer with a view to meeting it so far as funds available allow, by exercise of the powers contained in the Restoration of Order in Ireland Act and Regulations made thereunder with respect to local authorities which for any reason refuse to perform their duties.

Will the right hon. Gentleman say in what way the people who are suffering can collect the compensation from the local authorities?

If the local authorities fail to carry out the law they cannot collect it from the local authorities.

Are we to understand that the local authorities are to make good damage caused by soldiers?

In all the cases brought to my notice, yes; because the soldiers have made the damage in acts of legitimate self-defence.

Is the right hon. Gentleman prepared to say if the parties are unable to collect the compensation who will ultimately pay the compensation?

As far as innocent persons are concerned I answered it in my reply.

Does the right hon. Gentleman mean to say that the case of Balbriggan was one of legitimate self-defence, and does the Crown refuse to pay anything in that case and expect the local authority of Balbriggan to do so? [HON. MEMBERS: "Sit down!"]

In reference to that case the county court judge has not yet assessed the damage, and when he does I will consider that case.

Was that a case of legitimate self-defence? [HON. MEMBERS: "Sit down!"]

asked the Prime Minister if he will say what are the terms of service and rates of pay under which the force in Ireland popularly known as the Black and Tans is recruited?

The men described as Black and Tans are not a separate force, but are recruits to the permanent establishment of the Royal Irish Constabulary. The large majority are ex-service men recruited in Great Britain. Their terms of service and rates of pay as members of the Royal Irish Constabulary are similar to those of the police forces of Great Britain, and are based on the recommendations of the Desborough Committee.

asked the Prime Minister whether members of the Royal Irish Constabulary discharged through ill-health with under 25 years' service since 1st April, 1919, have not yet had their pensions increased under Section 4 of the Police Act, 1919; and, if so, whether any explanation can be given for the delay in dealing with the pensions of men who have lost their health in the discharge of police duty in Ireland and are now finding it difficult to exist upon their former pensions?

The revised pensions of men who have been pensioned on the ground of ill-health after completion of not less than 15 years' service are in course of payment. The cases of men with less than 15 years' service are now being considered. Men who have been incapacitated by wounds or injuries arising out of the present disturbed state of the country are being retained on full pay for an extended period, and the amount awarded to them under the Criminal Injuries Act is being paid to them without delay.

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that there is great distress in Ireland owing to the delay in the paying of the increased pensions of these pensioners, and will he do all in his power to accelerate it?

I am doing so.

asked the Prime Minister if he will state when the Supplementary Estimate for the salary of the new Under-Secretary for Ulster will be presented, and when an opportunity will be given for its discussion?

I assume that the hon. Member is referring to the recently appointed Assistant Under-Secretary for Ulster. It is hoped that this expenditure can be met out of savings on the Vote, in which case a Supplementary Estimate will be unnecessary.

Does that mean that we will have no opportunity of discussing this new appointment for a separate part of Ireland?

That question should not be addressed to me.

May I ask the Prime Minister, who is responsible for the Business of the House, to say whether we shall have an opportunity of discussing this change of policy, or elaboration of policy, in the appointment of a new Assistant Secretary for Ulster?

That is a matter for the Leader of the House.

asked the Postmaster-General is he aware that during recent months Ireland has suffered very keenly through merchandise being held up by shipping disputes, and that the withdrawal of the Irish Parcel Post will in consequence be felt more severely in Ireland than elsewhere, and seeing that steamers will be kept running for passengers and mails, can he see his way to give even a restricted parcel service?

Owing to the withdrawal of labour at certain Irish ports the normal routes for the conveyance of parcel mails to and from Ireland have, for some time past, been seriously curtailed. With a view to saving coal the Government have found it necessary to restrict still further the remaining services available, and I had no option but to suspend the Parcel Post to and from Ireland. I fear that with the present sailings even a restricted Parcel Post Service would be impracticable.

Is the Parcel Post still run to the North of Scotland and South of England and also to the Channel Islands; and is there not danger of the right hon. Gentleman's action being regarded in Ireland as partial?

All these services have been considerably curtailed.

If the Government is successful in the policy of extermination, will it not save the need of this Parcel Post?

Cannot some exception be made with regard to parcels containing foodstuffs? A very large number of people in this country are depending every day upon articles of food such as eggs and butter being sent by Parcels Post to England.

Would it not be possible for the right hon. Gentleman to continue the service from those ports which are still open and from which steamers are running, and to limit this stoppage to those ports the right hon. Gentleman mentioned where there is no steamer service?

I am told there is no cargo space available [Hon. MEMBERS: "Yes!"]

Is the right hon. Gentleman aware that in one little town in Ireland there is a loss of £500 a day through the stoppage of the Parcels Post and it is threatened with having to close the works?

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether the wife and sisters of the late Alderman McSwiney were refused permission to see him on Saturday and yesterday; what was the reason for this refusal, and whether now they will be allowed to view the body?

The Sisters have not been admitted for the last two days; the wife has been allowed to see him, when medical conditions permitted. The directions were all given purely on medical grounds. The relatives will be allowed to view the body.