Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 244: debated on Friday 31 October 1930

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers

Permanent Court Of International Justice

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs the present composition of the British national group for nominating Judges for election to the Permanent Court of International Justice; and what changes have recently taken place?

The British National Group consists of the Lord Chancellor, Professor A. Pearce Higgins and Sir Cecil Hurst. The Lord Chancellor and Professor Pearce Higgins were nominated in June last.

Naval And Military Pensions And Grants

asked the Minister of Pensions whether in order to relieve the anxiety and uncertainty of parents and guardians of ex-service men's children, he will consider the desirability of making the duration of educational grants for a period of years instead of for one year, subject only to satisfactory progress on the part of the child?

No difficulties should arise by reason of the limited duration of the periodic grant, because steps are taken to explain fully to the recipients the action they should take to obtain renewal of the grant. Where the case continues to fulfil the regulated conditions of the grant, no difficulty arises, but I should have no authority to authorise grants for any period in which these conditions might not be fulfilled.

Commons And Manorial Wastes

asked the Minister of Agriculture, if he will give a list, by counties, of the common lands and manorial wastes in England and Wales to which the public have been given since 4th April, 1930, rights of air and exercise under the Law of Property Act, 1925, stating in each case the parish in which the common is situated, the acreage of the land, and the name of the person executing the deed?

The particulars which my hon. Friend requires are given in the following statement:—

County.Common or Manorial Waste.Parish.Acreage.Name of party executing deed under Section 193 (2) of the Law of Property Act, 1925.
Acres.
BerksCrookhamThatcham414½A. S. B. Tull.
Cookham DeanBray, Cookham, Bisham and White Waltham.80Odney Estates, Ltd.
Pinkneys Green174
Maidenhead Thicket374
BucksLittle HampdenGreat and Little Hampden and Ellesborough.44¼C. E. A. T. Trevor-Battye.
DevonKentis MoorBroadhembury52½Alfred Burrow.
Maiden DownCulmstock107Charles Collier.
Red Ball Common
GloucesterBuckle WoodBrimpsfield and Cranham.82Ellis Hicks Beach.
Coopers HillBrockworth and UptonSt.Leonards16¼John Warren.
Brockworth Wood66¼
Upton Wood53½
HertfordCole, Cumberland, Staines, Letty, East End, and Birch Greens.Hertfordbury16¾Lord Desborough
SalopHenleyActon Scott16¾Mrs. J. S. Fullerton-Smith.
SomersetWoodlandsHolford98A. F. Luttrell.
SurreyRoyalGodalming Rural, Peperharow, Elstead and Witley.170Lord Midleton.
Ockley278
Bagmore36
Shackleford Heath (pt.).26
Mousehill Down38½
Witley (pt.)145½
LimpsfieldLimpsfield320¼G. C. G. Leveson Gower.
Moorhouse Bank11¾
Little Heath10
Watts Hill11¼
Itchingwood56¾
Newchapel GreenGodstone and Horne.11½Sir Bernard E. Greeen well, Bt.
Frogit Heath40½
Yorks (W.R)HorsforthHorsforth12J. M. S. Stanhope.
RawdonRawdon18½Maj. L. I. Cowper and T. B. Ecroyd.
Total2,786

asked the Minister of Agriculture if he will give the names of the commons in respect of which applications have been made to his Department since 7th November, 1929, and also of commons in respect of which an application was under consideration by his Department on that date for sanction under Section 194 of the Law of Property Act, 1925, to make an enclosure, specifying in each case whether a public inquiry has been held, the area of land sought to be enclosed, the purpose for which it was proposed to enclose the land, the area, if any, thrown into the common in lieu of the land enclosed, the result of the application, and the reason, in any ease where con- sent has been given without an area being thrown into the common at least equal to the land enclosed, for not requiring this course to he followed?

As stated in the reply I gave to my hon. Friend on 7th November, 1929, Section 194 of the Law of Property Act, 1925, requires the Ministry's consent not merely to actual enclosure, but also to the erection of any building or fence, or the construction of any other work not necessarily involving enclosure, whereby access to common land is prevented or impeded. The particulars which my hon. Friend requires as to applications under consideration on, and received since, 7th November, 1929, are as follow:

Name of Common.Approximate total area of Common.County.Whether a Public Inquiry was held.Area of land affected.Purpose for which it was proposed to erect a building or fence, etc.Area of land thrown into common in lieu of that lieu affected.Result of Application.Reason for not requiring an equivalent area to be added to the common.
Acres.a.r.p.a.rp.
Odney.BerksYes712Private open space.8020Consent refused
Butt Green60Cambs.Yes210College Playing Field.130Consent givenConsent given on condition that (in addition to the land added to the common) approximately one-third of an acre should be given for a playground for a County Borough Elementary School and two acres for a public parking place for cars.
Common land at Llanwnda and Llandwrog.2,259CaernarvonNo1 acre, 402 sq. yds. (including 7 separate inclosures).Garage, but, cowhouse, and fencing of land.NoneConsent givenIt was considered that the inclosures could not be regarded as substantially interfering with the public interests.
Common hand at Portland142Dorset No54 sq. ft.HutNoneConsent givenIt was considered that the inclosures could not be regarded as substantially interfering with the public rights of access for air and exercise.
No100 sq. ft.Hut extensionNoneConsent given
No376 sq. ft. (including 4 separate inclosures).HutsNoneConsent given
No225 sq ft. (including 3 separate inclosnres).HutsNoneConsent given
No447 sq. ft. (including 6 separate inclosures).HutsNoneConsent given
Beacontree Heath.15¼EssexNo9a.3r.30p.Preservation as public o pen space.NoneNot proceeded with.
Name of Common.Approximate total area of Common.County.Whether a Public Inquiry was held.Area of land affected.Purpose for which it was proposed to erect a building or fence, etc.Area of land thrown into common in lieu of that affected.Result of Application.Reason for not requiring an equivalent area to be added to the common.
Acres.
Llangyfelach75GlamorganNo1,250 sq. yds.Tramroad, fencing and engine shed.NoneConsent givenThe Ministry stipulated that a turnstile in the fencing to give public access to separated part of the common should be erected.
Kinsbourne Green.50Herts.To be held on 4th Nov.75 sq. yds.Extension of chapel and school.Under consideration.
Penllyn1,530MerionethNo13 acresFencing along road.NoneConsent givenMinistry stipulated that gates ensuring public access should be provided.
Gaywood2NorfolkYes2 acresRefuse tip and incinerator.NoneNot proceeded with.
Cefn, Cefn Pawl and Medwalbeth.466RadnorNo7a. 0r. 17p.Agricultural purposes.NoneConsent givenIt was considered that the inclosures could not be regarded as substantially interfering with the public interests.
(including 4 separate inclosures).
Hatchet GreenSouthamptonNo360 sq. yds.Village HallNoneApplication withdrawn.
Slab300Southampton15 acresAddition to golf course.Under consideration.
Hightown44SouthamptonNo0a. 1r. 12p.Reservoir, fence and water mains.NoneConsent givenThe conditions imposed by the Ministry ensured that there would be no material interference with the enjoyment of the common by the public.
Frensham601SurreyNo14 acresPrivate grounds81 acres (including Frensham Gt. Pond).Consent given
Todmorden Moor.173Yorks (W.R.)No13a. 2r. 0p.Private purposesNoneConsent refused

Proposed Aerodrome, Wednesfield (Overhead Cable)

asked the Minister of Transport whether any decision has yet been come to with regard to the application for consent to erect an overhead cable across the proposed aerodrome at Wednesfield; and what the present position is?

An application for my decision has not yet been made, but I understand it will be lodged shortly. As I have already informed the hon. Member, I shall consult the Air Ministry before coming to a decision.

Special Rates, Parish Councils

asked the Minister of Health whether his attention has been called to the fact that there is no statutory provision in which a parish council is entitled to obtain from a rural district council any details of special rate expenditure by the parish concerned; and whether, since this information ought to be provided, he will consider incorporating the necessary provision in any appropriate legislation he may introduce on the subject in the near future?

Regulations made under the Rating and Valuation Acts already provide that demand notes for special rates shall show separately the gross expenditure and the grant income under the Local Government Act, 1929, together with any other special rate credits, in respect of sewerage, water supply and other services. In addition, every parochial elector is entitled to have access to the accounts of the district council. I am not satisfied that further provision is necessary.