Written Answers
Post Office
Telephone Equipment (Cost)
asked the Postmaster-General the capital value per telephone at which the Post Office acquired from the National Telephone Company the then existing installation; the present capitalisation per telephone; and how this compares with that of other countries?
I do not think that any useful comparison can be made of costs of equipment provided during the 30 years from 1882 to 1912 with the costs of modern equipment the great part of which was purchased post-war. I have seen the figures £23 and £77 quoted as the capital value per instrument of the Post Office installation in 1912 and to-day respectively. The former figure is apparently arrived at by dividing the purchase price fixed by the arbitrator in the proceedings between the Telephone Company and the Post Office by the number of telephone stations then in service, and it makes no allowance for a large sum fixed for depreciation. The latter figure includes a large item for trunk plant, while the National Telephone figure relates exclusively to local line plant. The National Telephone system consisted almost wholly of magneto and other relatively cheap forms of plant; the Post Office system includes a great quantity of automatic plant which is even more costly than high-grade modern manual plant. So far as the cost per telephone in other countries is concerned, it is difficult again to make any useful comparison between costs in different countries under different conditions, but in a comparison of the costs between this country and, for instance, America, due regard must be made to the lower telephone density in Great Britain, and particularly to the objection hi this country to the use of overhead plant, and to the extended use of underground cables.
Exchequer (Relationship)
asked the Postmaster-General whether the modifications in the relationship between the Exchequer and the Post Office, which he has announced have been approved by the Government, will require legislation?
Yes, Sir. I have now been advised that legislation will be necessary, and the exact proposals to be placed before Parliament are now being considered.
Postal Deliveries, Walsall
asked the Postmaster-General if he is aware that the last postal delivery in the county borough of Walsall is at 4 p.m.; and whether he will establish a later delivery for the convenience of the inhabitants?
I am having inquiry made, and will write to the hon. Member.
Contributory Pensions
asked the Minister of Health the number of claims outstanding for pensions under the Widows', Orphans', and Old Age Contributory Pensions Acts; and the average time taken to deal with a widow's claim to pension and the claim of an insured person to old age pension?
The number of claims for pensions under the Widows', Orphans', and Old Age Contributory Pensions Acts awaiting decision in England and Wales on 15th December was 24,999. The average time taken to deal with a claim for a widow's pension under the Contributory Pensions Act, 1925, is 26 days, and for a widow's pension under the Act of 1929, 45 days, while for an old age pension the average period is 35 days. I would remind the hon. Member that in the case of the last two pensions, the claim for pension may be made at any time within four months prior to the date on which the specified age is reached.
Potato Crop (Yield)
asked the Minister of Agriculture the average yield per acre of the potato crop in England and Wales in each of the years 1923 to 1932, inclusive?
The estimated average yield per acre of potatoes in England and Wales in each of the years 1923–1932 was as follows:
| Year. | Tons. |
| 1923 | 5.9 |
| 1924 | 6.0 |
| 1925 | 6.5 |
| 1926 | 5.5 |
| 1927 | 5.9 |
| 1928 | 7.2 |
| 1929 | 6.9 |
| 1930 | 6.5 |
| 1931 | 5.5 |
| 1932 | 6.6 |
Local Education Authorities (Meals, School Children)
asked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Board of Education if he will supply a list of the local education authorities which have not yet adopted the Education (Provision of Meals) Act?
The list is as follows:LOCAL EDUCATION AUTHORITIES which are taking no action, at present, under Sections 82–84 of the Education Act, 1921.
- Aldershot.
- Bacup.
- Banbury (March, 1931).
- Barnstaple.
- Batley (May, 1932).
- Bedford.
- Bedfordshire.
- Berkshire.
- Beverley.
- Bexhill.
- Blackpool.
- Boston.
- Brentford and Chiswick.
- Bridgwater.
- Bridlington.
- Bromley.
- Buckinghamshire.*
- Burton-on-Trent.
- Bury St. Edmunds (August, 1926).
- Buxton.
- Caernarvonshire.
- Cambridge (May, 1929).
- Cambridgeshire.
- Cannock (October, 1926).
- Cardiganshire.
- Carmarthenshire (January, 1927).
- Carmarthen.
- Chepping Wycombe.
- Cheltenham.
- Chester (August, 1923).
- Chesterfield (August, 1926).
- Clitheroe.
- Colchester.
- Congleton.
- Cornwall (August, 1923).
- Coseley.
- Deal
- Denbighshire (December, 1926).
- Derbyshire (September, 1926).
- Devonshire.
- Dorset.
- Dover.
- Durham Borough.
- Eastbourne.
- East Retford.
- Ely, Isle of.
- Erith (December, 1930).
- Exeter.
- Falmouth.
- Faversham.
- Finchley.
- Flintshire (February, 1927).
- Folkestone (April, 1932).
- Gloucester.
- Gloucestershire (December, 1926).
- Gravesend.
- Great Yarmouth.
- Guildford.
- Hampshire.
- Harrogate.
- Hartlepool (July, 1927).
- Haslingden.
- Hemel Hempstead.
- Hendon (December, 1927).
- Hereford.
- Herefordshire.
- Hertfordshire.*
- Heston and Isleworth.
- Hindley (December, 1926).
- Hove.
- Huntingdonshire.
- Ilford.
- Ince-in-Makerfield (December, 1926)
- Kendal.
- Kidderminster (April, 1923).
- Kingston-on-Thames.
- Leicestershire (December, 1926).
- Lewes.
- Lincs, Holland.
- Lincs, Kesteven.
- Lincs, Lindsey (December, 1926).
- Llanelly.
- Loughborough.
- Lowestoft.
- Luton (June, 1922).
- Lytham St. Annes.
- Maidenhead.
- Maidstone.
- Margate.
- Merionethshire
- Middlesex.
- Montgomeryshire.
- Morecambe.
- Morley (July, 1922).
- Neath.
- Newark.
- Newbury.
- Newport (Isle of Wight).
- New Windsor.
- Norfolk.
- Northamptonshire.
- Nottinghamshire (December, 1926).
- Ossett (December, 1926).
- Oxfordshire.
- Pembrokeshire (December, 1926).
- Pembroke (January, 1931).
- Penge (April, 1922).
- Penzance.
- Peterborough.
- Peterborough, Soke of.
- Plymouth.
- Pontefract (December, 1926).
- Poole.
- Port Talbot (January, 1927).
- Radnorshire.
- Ramsgate (March, 1931).
- Reigate.
- Richmond.
- Royal Leamington Spa.
- Rutland.
- Scarborough.
- Scilly, Isle of.
- Shrewsbury.
- Salop (October, 1926).
- Somerset (December, 1926).
- Southport (March, 1932).
- Spenborough (September, 1926).
- Staffordshire (October, 1926).
- Stockton-on-Tees.
- Stretford (July, 1922).
- Suffolk, East.
- Suffolk, West.
- Surrey.
- Sussex, East.
- Sussex, West.
- Taunton (September, 1924).
- Tiverton.
- Torquay.
- Tunbridge Wells.
- Twickenham.
- Walsall (April, 1923).
- Warrington.
- Warwickshire (March, 1929).
- Waterloo-with-Seaforth.
- Wednesbury.
- Westmorland.
- Weymouth.
- Whitehaven (September, 1923).
- Wight, Isle of.
- Wiltshire.
- Wimbledon (September, 1925).
- Worcestershire (August, 1920).
- Worthing.
- Wrexham (December, 1926).
- Yeovil.
- Yorkshire, East Riding.*
- Yorkshire, North Riding (March, 1923).
* Action taken but restricted to powers under Section 82.
NOTE.—Where action has been taken by an authority during the past 10 years, the date of the cessation of such action is given against the name of the authority.
Political Propaganda
asked the Home Secretary the number of prosecutions of political propagandists during 1927, 1928, 1929, 1930, 1931, and for 1932 up to the latest date for which figures are available, and the number sentenced to imprisonment?
Political propaganda is not in itself an offence, and, in the absence of particulars as to the precise offences which the hon. Member has in mind, I cannot say what figures are available.
| The following TABLE shows the number and estimated value of schemes under the main classes of relief works which have been approved for grant of State financial assistance since 1st September, 1931, together with the number of persons directly employed on these schemes at 28th October, 1932:— | |||
| Type of Scheme. | Number of Schemes. | Estimated Value. | Numbers directly employed on 28th October, 1932. |
| £ | |||
| Schemes assisted under Part I of the Development Act (Lewis Committee). | 6 | 495,983 | 134 (a) |
| Schemes assisted under Part II of the Development Act (Unemployment Grants Committee). | 254 (c) | 4,324,000 (c) | 4,551 (b) |
| Ministry of Transport Road Schemes | 326 | 3,314,874 | 1,912 |
| (a) Two of these schemes were still in operation at the date referred to, the remaining four having been completed. | |||
| (b) 82 of these schemes were still in operation at the date referred to, the remaining 172 having been completed. | |||
| (c) Excluding 21 other schemes of an estimated value of £495,000, which were approved, but subsequently withdrawn. | |||
| The schemes assisted under Part I of the Development Act comprised gas and water schemes and the provision of rail facilities at collieries. The schemes assisted by the Unemployment Grants Committee included sewerage schemes; gas, water and electricity supply schemes; dock and harbour improvements; land reclamation and drainage; parks and recreation grounds and sea defence works. | |||
| The figures given include all schemes approved for grant since 1st September, 1931, whether the application for grant was made before or after this date. | |||
Cyprus
asked the Secretary of State for the Colonies the present position in Cyprus; and whether the discontent has been allayed?
The situation in Cyprus is generally satisfactory, and I have nothing to add to the reply which I gave to the hon. Member for Wolverhampton East (Mr. Mander) on 15th November last. I am sending the hon. Member for Pontypool a copy of the reply to which I refer.
Unemployment (Relief Works)
asked the Minister of Labour if he will furnish a return showing the number, nature and cost of relief works in respect of which State assistance has been applied for since the present Government took office; the extent to which grants have actually been approved, and the number of persons employed on the schemes?
pursuant to his reply [OFFICIAL REPORT, 1st December, 1932, col. 961, Vol. 272] supplied the following information:
Kenya (Crown Land, Grants)
asked the Secretary of State for the Colonies how many grants of Crown land have been made in Kenya between 1st January, 1912, and 1st January, 1932, to Europeans and to Africans, respectively; and what are the total areas involved in the two classes?
I am not in a position to state the number of grants, which could only be ascertained after exhaustive search. Apart from the native reserves, the total area of the grants of Crown land in the period in question is 3,806,510 acres, subject to adjustments in respect of surrenders, reversions, etc. The figures do not enable me to distinguish the proportion of grants made to Europeans. The area of the reserves secured to the natives by Ordinance is approximately 31,000,000 acres. According to the latest information in my possession, no individual grants of Crown land have been made to members of the African tribes for which reserves have been gazetted. Grants at the Coast have been made to Arabs, Somalis and others, but particulars could again only be obtained by exhaustive search.
Plumage (Illegal Importation)
asked the Financial Secretary to the Treasury if he will give a list of birds the plumage of which has been illegally imported and confiscated under the Importation of Plumage (Prohibition) Act, 1921, during the period 1st July, 1932 to 30th September, 1932, together with the approximate quantity of plumage involved in each case?
The following is a list of birds, the plumage of which was illegally imported and was confiscated by the Customs authorities under the Importation of Plumage (Prohibition) Act, 1921, during the period 1st July, 1032 to 30th September, 1932, together with the approximate quantity of plumage involved in each case.
Name of Bird and Approximate Amount of Plumage.
- Brambling—6 millinery mounts.
- Hawk—1 wing.
- Hawk Owl—8 single feathers.
- Humming Bird—5 skins.
- Pheasant, Copper—54 millinery mounts each with a small amount of this plumage.
- Pheasant, Himalayan—1 skin.
- Peacock—94 single feathers, 10 millinery mounts, 2 fans.
- Pelican—2 skins.
- Robin, American—1 skin.
- Sparrow (of a prohibited variety)—5 millinery mounts.
Fishing Industry (Marine Pisciculture)
asked the Minister for Agriculture if, in view of the depression in the fishing industry, he will institute an inquiry into the possibilities of marine culture, the cultivation of edible sea-weeds and ocean pisciculture, with a view to increasing food supplies in this country?
The prospects of marine pisciculture have been the subject of careful scientific study, which has shown that its economic possibilities are very limited. I would point out, however, that the difficulties of the fishing industry are due chiefly to low prices, which are largely the result of the abundant supplies already existing.