Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 288: debated on Monday 23 April 1934

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers

Broadcasting (Relaying, Wireless Exchanges)

asked the Postmaster-General whether he is prepared to appoint a Departmental Committee to con-eider the question of radio diffusion?

I presume that my hon. Friend refers to the relaying of broadcast programmes by wireless exchanges. The earliest date at which the licences for such exchanges are terminable is 31st December, 1936; and it would, in my opinion, be premature at the present time to consider the appointment of a committee to inquire into the system.

asked the Prime Minister whether he is prepared to move for the appointment of a Select Committee of the House to consider the question of radio diffusion?

My right hon. Friend the Postmaster-General has just answered a similar question as regards the appointment of a Departmental Committee. My hon. Friend will, no doubt, understand that similar considerations apply in the case of the appointment of a Select Committee.

Telegraphic Facilities, Bardsey Island

asked the Postmaster-General whether, in view of the impossibility of maintaining any communication between the island of Bardsey and the mainland for extended periods during stormy weather, he will consider the establishment of a wireless station for the purpose?

The annual costs of a telegraph service (provided by wireless) would be out of all proportion to the revenue from the very small traffic which could be anticipated, and in these circumstances I regret that I should not be justified in establishing a service without a substantial contribution from the interested parties.

India (Medical Services)

asked the Secretary of State for India whether the proposal made in the Council of State that recruitment to the Indian medical services should be by simultaneous competitive examination in Britain and Indian has been agreed to by His Majesty's Government and the Government of India?

The resolution on this subject in the Council of State was withdrawn after the Government spokesmen had given reasons why the Government of India could not accept it, and after an undertaking had been given that the Debate would be forwarded to me. I have not yet received any observations from the Government of India in the matter.

asked the Secretary of State for India the relative proportion of Indians to Europeans now serving in the Indian medical service?

According to information available on 1st March, the actual strength of the Indian medical service was 385 British officers and 240 Indian officers; 29 of the latter held temporary commissions.

Unemployment (Castleford And Pontefract)

Unemployment (Castleford And Pontefract)

asked the Minister of Labour the number of persons registered as wholly unemployed and temporarilyUnemployed persons on the registers of the Castleford and Pontefract Employment Exchanges.

Date.Castleford.Pontefract.
Wholly unemployed.Temporarily stopped.Total.Wholly unemployed.Temporarily stopped.Total.
25th March, 19292,1712952,4661,151551,206
24th March, 19301,9686542,6221,2143001,514
23rd March, 19312,8342,8275,6611,6124792,091
21st March, 19323,3051,5164,8211,7681,4583,226
20th March, 193343201,3785,6982,0311,2463,277
19th March, 19343,8398514,6901,8147642,578

Milk-Recording Societies

asked the Minister of Agriculture the number of persons availing themselves of the milk-recording scheme in the year following its inception, for each subsequent fifth year, and for the year ended 1st October, 1933?

The number of members of milk-recording societies operating under the Ministry's Live Stock Improvement Scheme in the first year of the scheme, i.e., the year ending 31st March, 1915, was 264. In the years ending 1st October, 1920, 1925, 1930 and 1933, the numbers were 2,075, 5,081, 4,501 and 4,187 respectively.

Period.Nationalities of Vessels.
Norwegian.German.Dutch.French.U.S.A.Other Foreign.Total Foreign.
Thousand Tons Net.
March to August, 19325782956651112771,5953,521
September, 1932 to February, 1933.611299598413031,6813,533
March to August, 1933690390699563201,7963,951
September, 1933 to February, 1934.735376741602881,8384,038
As regards the second part of the question, the tonnage of British vessels which arrived at the Port of London during each of the two later periods was actually stopped, respectively, at Castleford and Pontefract for the last six years to date?

Trade And Commerce

Port Of London

asked the President of the Board of Trade, by countries, the tonnage of the foreign vessels coming into the Port of London in each of the last four periods of six months; and what is the explanation of the decline of British tonnage and the increase of foreign tonnage coming into this port?

The following table shows the net tonnage of the foreign vessels that arrived, with cargoes and in ballast, at the Port of London, in the foreign trade, during each of the last four periods of six months, distinguishing the nationalities of the vessels so far as the information is available:greater than in the corresponding earlier period, although it represented a smaller proportion of the total.

Japan

asked the President of the Board of Trade the value of the exports to and imports from Japan both for Great Britain and for the British Empire in the year 1933 and for January and February, 1934?

The value of merchandise imported into and exported from Japan in the trade with Great Britain and other British countries, so far as the particulars are available, was as follows:

1933.January and February, 1934.
Imports into Japan.†
Thousand Yen.Thousand Yen.
From Great Britain82,55910,896
From Other British countries *523,93276,096
Total606,49186,992
Exports from Japan †
Thousand Yen.Thousand Yen.
To Great Britain87,84917,487
To Other British countries.*396,40370,232
Total484,25287,719
* The countries included are Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Cape Colony and Natal, British India and Ceylon, Eastern Africa (including Foreign Eastern Africa), Hong Kong, Straits Settlements British Borneo and Aden.
† Japan Proper, including Karafuto (Japanese Saghalien).

Company's Title

asked the President of the Board of Trade why permission was granted for the use of the word "Empire" in the title of the company known as Empire Sweets, Limited (Reg. No. 282,223), and other companies, after permission had been refused in a similar application made in respect of Empire Collect (London) Limited, for a household invention in connection with Empire commodities?

The use of the word "Empire" in the title "Empire Sweets, Limited" did not, in the opinion of the Registrar, acting in accordance with the provsions of Section 17 (2) of the Companies Act, and having regard to the objects and the nature of the company, suggest connection with His Majesty's Government or a Department thereof. As regards Empire Collect, Limited, I would refer my hon. Friend to the answer which I gave him on 14th December last.

Smallholdings

asked the Minister of Agriculture whether his attention has been called to the possibilities of developing dual occupational holdings; and what is the policy of his Department in respect to extending this type of agricultural activity?

I have been asked to reply. The policy of my right hon. Friend's Department is, with due regard to economy and within the limits of the financial resources available, to encourage the provision of smallholdings by county councils and councils of county boroughs under the powers conferred upon them by the Small Holdings and Allotments Acts, 1908 to 1926. Such holdings may be either whole-time or part-time.

Tax Office Accommodation, Kendal

asked the First Commissioner of Works what stage has been reached in the negotiations for new office accommodation for His Majesty's inspector of taxes and staff at Kendal; and whether he can indicate when the move into new offices is likely to be effected?

The negotiations referred to have fallen through, owing to the high cost of the scheme proposed, and alternative proposals will have to be considered. Accordingly, I am afraid that I am not in a position to state when new offices can be provided.

Housing, Scotland

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland the number of houses the construction of which was approved in each month of 1932, 1933 and 1934, distinguishing between slum-clearance and other assisted houses?

Number of Local Authority Houses for which tenders were approved by the Department of Health for Scotland in each of the months specified.

Slum Clearance.General Housing.Unallocated at date of tender.*Grand Total.
50% Grant 1923 Act.1930 Act.Total.1924 Act.1931 Act.1933 Act. (£3 subsidy)Total.
1932.
January154154308275275236819
February423423404404827
March696016701,6971,6974182,785
April68518571,2191,219982,174
May7117113643641201,195
June2289801,2084504501121,770
July4054054084084817
August104935035289462281,133
September817817688688281,533
October24937961494494241,479
November667368021,0641821,2461242,172
December526526735735301,291
1933.
January6066901,2963983981,694
February364364830849141,278
March1,0491,0496421007421,791
April962303262082088542
May704704302302261,032
June1,0681,068129104233361,337
July88088017317341,057
August862862148148441,054
September18296314212813050494
October12396408306440448
November7377374138142100979
December635635322660118152905
1934.
January2765848601010870
February1,1221,222201121321,254
March321,1511,18322442461,429
Total1,59718,40219,99911,24249680012,5381,62234,159
Deduct Cancelled2626
Net Total1,59634,133

* Of the 1,622 houses unallocated at the date of tender, 661 were subsequently allocated to the 1930 Act, 625 to 1924 Act. 26 were cancelled, and 310 remain unallocated.

Naval Construction, Private Yards

asked the First Lord of the Admiralty the total tonnage of all Admiralty work now under construction in private yards?

The total tonnage now under construction in private yards is approximately 85,000.

Diphtheria Immunisation

asked the Minister of Health whether his attention he been called to cases that have occurred of anaphylaxis due to the injection of toxin antitoxin; and whether, in view of the use in this country of toxoid antitoxin for diphtheria immunisation, he will take steps to safeguard the public against possible similar results of such injections?

The answer to the first part of the question is in the affirmative. With regard to the second part, anaphylaxis is not a phenomenon peculiar to diphtheria immunisation. I am advised that the relevant facts are widely recognised, and I do not consider it necessary to take any special action in the matter.