Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 289: debated on Tuesday 1 May 1934

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers

Japan

asked the Secretary of State for Dominion Affairs whether any communications have reached him from the Dominion Governments of Australia and New Zealand with regard to the claim of Japan to the hegemony of the Pacific?

South African Protectorates

asked the Secretary of State for Dominion Affairs whether he can make any statement as to the attitude of the British Government with respect to the suggested incorporation in the Union of South Africa of Bechuanaland, Basutoland, and Swaziland?

I would refer the hon. Member to the statement which I made yesterday in reply to a question addressed to me by the hon. Member for Rothwell (Mr. Lunn).

Cyprus (Sedition, Sentences)

asked the Secretary of State for the Colonies whether he is aware that 10 Cypriots have recently been condemned in the Assize Court at Nicosia to sentences aggregating 20 years and five months hard labour; whether he will state the nature of the charge against them; whether these men are members of the Communist party; and whether he will consider the remission of their sentences?

My information is that 11 persons have recently been convicted on charges of sedition by the Cyprus Courts and sentenced to terms of imprisonment ranging from four years to nine months. As the prerogative of mercy is vested in the Governor, the question of the remission or reduction of the sentences is a matter for him, and not for me.

China

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether, in view of the new Japanese claim to domination in China, he will consult the chief chambers of commerce in this country as to the effect which any such policy will exercise on British trade?

As I informed the House yesterday, Japan has reaffirmed her adherence to the policy of the Open Door in China. In these circumstances, I cannot agree that it is necessary to adopt he course proposed by my hon. Friend.

Taxi-Cab Fares, Edinburgh

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland whether his attention has been drawn to the fact that taximeter-cabs in Edinburgh still have a minimum charge of 1s. 6d.; and whether he will take steps to secure a reduction?

No, Sir. The rates or fares for hackney carriages are fixed under by-laws made by the corporation of Edinburgh and confirmed by the Sheriff of the Lothians and Peebles. The matter is not one in which I have any jurisdiction to intervene.

Congo Basin Treaties

asked the President of the Board of Trade for how long the question of the desirability or otherwise of abrogating the Congo Basin treaties has been under consideration by the Government; and whether any decision has yet been reached?

This question was examined by the Government of the day in 1930 having regard to the provisions of the convention which contemplated a conference in that year to introduce modifications. It was further examined by the present Government in 1932, and has since been under continuous review. As regards the last part of the question, I cannot add to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for East Dorset (Mr. Hall-Caine) on 27th February last.

Post Office

Telephone Service (Flats)

asked the Postmaster-General, in view of the recent expansion in the number of large blocks of flats in London and elsewhere which operate telephone exchanges, what steps he takes to limit the amount of profit which the owners of such blocks make from their tenants by the operation of such exchanges through charging more than the current rate for calls and other means?

Telephone installations are provided for the owners of blocks of flats at the normal rates, and the charges referred to are made by the owners to their tenants, but I am having the subject further examined.

Sixpenny Postal Orders

asked the Postmaster-General the number of 6d. postal orders sold during the last five years for which figures are available; and what was the total poundage received each year on account of this sale and the amount of revenue from postage, assuming each of them was posted under a 1½d. stamp?

The informations required is as follows :

Financial Year.Number of 6d. P.O's. sold.Poundage.Postage at a hypothetical rate of 1½d. per Order.
££
1928–2911, 874,00049,47074,210
1929–3020,439,00085,160127,740
1930–3129,699,000123,750185,620
1931–3233,993,000141,640212,460
1932–3326,465,000110,270165,400
122,470,000510,290765,430

Income Tax

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he is aware that the personal allowance for Income Tax purposes on small incomes was £160 at one time and that that amount was cut to £100; and what the loss would be to the Exchequer if this cut of £60 was restored by one-half, thereby increasing the allowance to £130?

The main personal allowances now given as part of the graduation of the Income Tax are not confined to small incomes, but are given to all taxpayers, and the amount of personal allowance depends upon the family responsibilities of the taxpayer concerned. Prior to 1920 the graduation of the Income Tax was effected by means of differential rates and abatements for small incomes, and it is not possible to

Reserves of Beet Sugar Factory Companies as at 31st March, 1933.
Company.General Reserve.Capital and Special Reserve.Total.
£££
1. English Beet Sugar Corporation, Ltd.…409,39937,120446,519.
2. Home Grown Sugar, Ltd.…27,80943,79371,602
3. Ely Beet Sugar Factory, Ltd.…233,90230,000263,902
4. Ipswich Beet Sugar Factory, Ltd.…135,68822,500158,188
5. King's Lynn Beet Sugar Factory, Ltd.…26,847—26,847
6. Anglo-Scottish Beet Sugar Corporation, Ltd.…—40,255*40,255
7. West Midland Sugar Company, Ltd.…50,00012,42362,423
8. Second Anglo-Scottish Beet Sugar Corporation, Ltd.—29,89029,890
9. Lincolnshire Sugar Company, Ltd. ……10,00049,69459,694
10. Second Lincolnshire Sugar Company, Ltd.…—11,08011,080
11. United Sugar Company, Ltd.…100,00017,783117,783
12. Central Sugar Company, Ltd.…50,000—50,000
13. Yorkshire Sugar Company, Ltd.…—18,35818,358
14. Shropshire Beet Sugar Company, Ltd.…—18,53218,532
15. British Sugar Manufacturers, Ltd.…———
Total…£1,043,645£331,428†£l,375,073†
* Also £90,855, provision for balance of loss in Subsidiary Company.
† Includes £165,815 advances under the British Sugar Industry (Assistance) Act, 1931.

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) the approximate total amount of the capital which has been subscribed and invested in the beet sugar factories; and the approximate amount invested in each separate company or undertaking operating beet sugar factories;

give any figure of cost by relation to the old system of abatements. I would, however, refer my hon. and gallant Friend to the answer given to the hon. Member for East Fulham (Mr. Wilmot), on 24th April, regarding the cost of restoring the personal allowances to the level obtaining before the second Budget of 1931.

Beet Sugar Factory Companies

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer the amounts allocated to reserve in each of the companies or undertakings operating beet sugar factories?

I have been asked to reply. The following statement gives the information desired.(2) how much of the capital invested in each company or undertaking operating a beet sugar factory has been paid off; and how much of the capital of each undertaking has not yet been paid off?

I have been asked to reply. The following statement gives the desired information.

CAPITAL OF BEET SUGAR FACTORY COMPANIES.
Company.Share Capital.Mortgages and Debentures.Total Invested Capital as at 31st March, 1933.
Authorised.Subscribed as at 31st March, 1933.Original Amount.Amount paid off by 31st March, 1933.Amount Outstanding as at 31st March, 1933.
££££££
1. English Beet Sugar Corporation, Ltd.…500,000500,000———500,000
2. Home Grown Sugar, Ltd.…250,000145,500 (a)260,000260,000—145,500
3. Ely Beet Sugar Factory, Ltd.…450,000450,000100,000100,000—450,000
4. Ipswich Beet Sugar Factory, Ltd.…400,000400,000100,000100,000—400,000
5. King's Lynn Beet Sugar Factory, Ltd.…450,000450,000———450,000
6. Anglo-Scottish Beet Sugar Corporation, Ltd.500,000442,910610,000238,500371,500 (c)814,410
7. West Midland Sugar Co., Ltd.…250,000180,000150,000100,80049,200229,200
8. Second Anglo-Scottish Beet Sugar Corporation, Ltd.…250,000240,500865,000123,600741,400981,900
9. Lincolnshire Sugar Co., Ltd.…332,500332,500225,000161,00064,000396,500
10. Second Lincolnshire Sugar Co., Ltd.…185,000162,06751,5005,00046,500208,567
11. United Sugar Co., Ltd.…300,000300,000———300,000
12. Central Sugar Co., Ltd.…200,000175,000185,000185,000—175,000
13. Yorkshire Sugar Co., Ltd.…275,000196,874———196,874
14. Shropshire Beet Sugar Co., Ltd.…373,500354,559———354,559
15. British Sugar Manufacturers, Ltd.…350,000 (nominal)116,044 (b)250,00050,000200,000316,044
5,066,0004,445,9542,796,5001,323,9001,472,6005,918,554
NOTES.—(a) Originally 500,000 shares of £1 each. Reduced in 1923 to 500,000 shares of 5s. each. 82,000 shares of 5s. each issued subsequently.
(b) Share capital written down from £348,130 in 1931–32.
(c) Balance Sheet shows also a liability of £140,000 in respect of 5 per cent. Convertible Notes.

In addition to the amounts given above, certain of the Companies have raised loans from Banks and other sources. In a number of cases these are of a temporary nature and are repaid as opportunity arises. They are secured in some instances by the issue of mortgage debentures as collateral security. Share capital is not normally repayable.

Small Pox, Blackburn

asked the Minister of Health if he is aware that the first case of smallpox in the recent outbreak at Blackburn that proved fatal the day after admission into hospital had been wrongly diagnosed; and to what was his death attributed on the death certificate?

The answer to the first part of the question is in the affirmative. On the death certificate the death was attributed to (a) Heart failure, (b) Acute toxaemia, (c) Varicella. The death has been classed to smallpox.

Unemployment

Lancashiee

asked the Minister of Labour the number of insured persons in Lancashire for the years 1921, 1922, 1923, 1924, and 1933; and the figures of registered unemployed for the same period?

The following table shows the estimated numbers of persons, in Lancashire, insured under the Unemployment Insurance Acts at the beginning of July, and the numbers of unemployed persons on the registers of

Determinations by certain Public Assistance Authorities on applications for Transitional Payments.
——Total number of determinations.Allowed at maximum benefit rates.Allowed at lower rates.Needs of applicants held Dot to justify payment.
Norfolk Administrative County :Per cent.Percent.Per cent.
12th Nov., 1931—23rd Jan., 1932*3,21232·857·49·8
25th Jan., 1932—3rd March, 1934 :
Initial Applications10,15964·631·53·9
Renewals and Revisions21,26042·156·61·3
Norwich County Borough :
12th Nov., 1931—23rd Jan., 1932*4,14351·826·022·2
25th Jan., 1932—3rd March, 1934 :
Initial Applications6,68152·523·823·7
Renewals and Revisions23,86570·626·92·5
Great Yarmouth County Borough :
12th Nov., 1931—23rd Jan., 1932*1,25028·753·417·9
25th Jan., 1932—3rd March, 1934 :
Initial Applications4,05029·266·04·8
Renewals and Revisions13,99833·964·81·3
* The figures for this period include renewals and revisions as well as initial applications; separate figures for initial applications are not available.

Employment Exchanges in Lancashire at the end of June, in each of the years 1923, 1924 and 1933. Corresponding figures are not available for 1921 or 1922.

Year.Estimated numbers insured at the beginning of July.*Numbers of persons (insured and uninsured) registered as unemployed at the end of June.
19231,762,160258,280
19241,751,830215,599
19331,826,610420,025

* The figures of the estimated numbers insured for 1923 and 1924 relate to persons aged 16 years and over; the figure for 1933 relates to persons aged 16 to 64 years.

Transitional Payments, Norfolk

asked the Minister of Labour the number of claims for transitional benefit which have been considered by the public assistance committee in the county of Norfolk from November, 1931, to the latest available date, with the percentage of awards of full benefit, reduced benefit, and no benefit, respectively, giving separate figures for Norwich?

Chatham And Gravesend

asked the Minister of Labour the number of persons on the register of the Rochester and Gravesend Employment Exchanges at the latest convenient date?

At 19th March, 1934, there were 4,954 unemployed persons registered at the Chatham Employment Exchange, and 2,603 at the Gravesend Employment Exchange. These figures include persons registered at the local juvenile employment bureaux.