Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 291: debated on Thursday 21 June 1934

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers

Trade And Commerce

Anglo-French Agreement

asked the President of the Board of Trade if he can now make a statement on the negotiations with the French Government in relation to a trade treaty, with particular reference to the silk and rayon industries?

I am not in a position to add anything to the reply I gave on 19th June to the hon. Member for Aberdare (Mr. G. Hall).

Sugar (Statistics)

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will state separately, for the financial years ended 31st March, 1930, 1931 and 1932, respectively, the weight of foreign raw cane-sugar, of Colonial raw cane-sugar, of foreign raw beet-sugar, and of home-grown raw beet-sugar; and the amount of duty paid thereon, respectively, delivered to British sugar refiners?

The quantities of foreign cane sugar, of Empire cane sugar, of foreign beet sugar and of homegrown beet sugar delivered for refining during each of the financial years ended 31st March, 1930, 1931 and 1932, and the amounts of duty paid thereon respectively were as follow:

Year ended 31st March.Foreign Cane Sugar.Empire Cane Sugar.Foreign Beet Sugar.Home-Grown Beet Sugar.

Quantity duty paid for refining in refineries.

Cwt.Cwt.Cwt.Cwt.
193019,801,00012,178,0001,886,0002,161,000
193124,309,0009,241,0002,450,0003,240,000
193222,920,00011,022,0005,394,0003,075,000

Amount of duty paid thereon.

££££
19308,267,0002,851,000750,000515,000
193110,102,0002,128,000970,000772,000
19329,522,0002,575,0002,141,000733,000
The term "Colonial sugar" in the question is assumed to mean "Empire sugar," i.e., Colonial and Dominion. In any event, separate figures for Colonial and Dominion sugar delivered to refineries are not available.

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will state separately for the financial years ending 31st March, 1930, 1931, and 1932, respectively, the weight of foreign raw cane-sugar and of Colonial raw cane-sugar, respectively, on which duty was paid and the amount respectively delivered for direct consumption year by year, the weight of foreign refined sugar and the amount of duty paid thereon that was delivered for direct consumption year by year, and also the weight of British

1929–30.1930–31.1931–32.
(1)Quantity of unrefined cane sugar duty paid:
Foreigncwt.20,375,00025,484,00023,850,000
Empirecwt.14,449,00010,328,00012,166,000
(2)Quantity of unrefined cane sugar duty paid for purposes other than refining in refineries:
Foreigncwt.574,0001,175,000930,000
Empirecwt.2,271,0001,087,0001,144,000
(3)Foreign refined sugar:
Quantity duty paidcwt.1,044,0001,167,0001,019,000
Amount of duty received£547,000617,000525,000
(4)British refined sugar:
Quantity exported on drawbackcwt.3,922,0005,277,0002,806,000
Amount of drawback paid£1,836,0002,455,0001,304,000
(5)Net amount which would have been retained by the Treasury if all sugars delivered to refineries (and sugar from Empire Countries that passed into direct consumption) had paid the same duty as foreign raw and foreign refined sugar.15,760,00015,646,00018,292,000
The figures at (5) in the table include the following amounts in respect of homegrown sugar delivered to refineries:
£
1929–301,257,000
1930–311,886,000
1931–321,789,000
The term "Colonial Sugar" in the Question is assumed to mean "Empire Sugar."
The drawback figures relate to sugar only, and do not include sugar contained in composite articles

refined sugar exported and the amount of drawback allowed thereon for each of the years named; and what would have been the net amount that would have ben retained by the Treasury if all the duties paid on sugars delivered to refineries and sugar from British Colonies that passed into direct consumption had paid the same duty as foreign raw and foreign refined sugar?

Heaton Bleaching Mills, Blackley (Accident)

asked the Home Secretary whether he is now in a position to say what action, if any, is to be taken in connection with the accident which occurred recently at the Heaton Bleaching Mills, Blackley, Manchester, when four youths lots their lives?

The reports show that this accident arose from the accidental admission of scalding liquor into a kier, and that this was due to a momentary lapse on the part of a kier-man. It would have been prevented if a recommendation made by a factory inspector some years ago had been observed, but this recommendation was not based on any specific provision of the Factory Acts and no breach of those Acts was involved. The question of the precautions to be taken against accidents from this cause was discussed at conferences with the industry in 1914, but, owing to the diversity of the plant, the agreement then reached provided only in general terms that the means adopted should be the best possible having regard to the circumstances of each case. Accidents of this kind have been very rare, but the recent case has shown the need for more specific requirements, and I have approved a proposal of the chief inspector to convene at an early date a special meeting of the trade associations concerned to discuss the position.

London Traffic Signals

asked the Home Secretary the saving in annual expense (represented either as a number of police constables or as an annual amount of money) which has been effected in the Metropolitan Police area in each of the last three years by the substitution of traffic light signals for police constables for the purpose of controlling vehicular traffic at cross roads and road junctions?

From the introduction of the system in 1932 to the end of 1932 a saving of 21 constables was effected, and in 1933 a further saving of 224 constables. In the current year savings effected by the installation of signals have so far been absorbed by the calls of traffic duty in other directions.

Vaccination Fine

asked the Home Secretary what sum was paid by a lady sympathiser in connection with the imprisonment of Mr. Carr, of Trowbridge, to secure his release after one week's imprisonment for non-payment of a vaccination fine?

I am informed that on 19th January a postal order for 13s. was received by the prisoner from Mrs. Carr, to whom this sum had been handed by a "Wellwisher."

Murder Conviction, Manchester

asked the Home Secretary whether he is aware that Walter Prince, at the Nottinghamshire Assizes on Monday, 18th June, confessed that he had been guilty in 1928 of the wilful murder of Mr. Charles Armstrong, of Rusholme, Manchester; and whether, in view of the fact that a Mr. George Fratson, of Royton, is now undergoing a sentence of penal servitude for life on a charge of murder of Mr. Armstrong, he will cause further investigation to be made into the matter?

I would refer my hon. Friend to the reply which I have given to-day to similar questions by my hon. Friends the Members for Salford South (Mr. Stourton) and Attercliffe (Mr. Pike).

Cruelty To Dogs

asked the Home Secretary in how many cases during the past four months courts of summary jurisdiction, on convicting an individual for cruelty to a dog, have exercised their powers to order that such individual shall, for a period, not be entitled to take out a dog licence or have the care or custody of a dog; and in how many cases has the power not been exercised?

Employment (Statistics)

asked the Minister of Labour the total number of insured persons estimated to be in employment on 14th June, 1934?

The latest date for which information is at present available is 14th May, 1934, when the estimated number of insured persons in employment in Great Britain was 10,187,000. The next estimate, which will relate to 25th June, will be published on 10th July.

Unemployment (Statistics)

asked the Minister of Labour the number of insured workers there are in England, Wales and Scotland, respectively; whether there has been an increase or a reduction; if so, the number in each country; the number of unemployed in 1933 in each of these

Estimated number of insured persons aged 16–64 at July, 1933.Unemployed persons (insured and uninsured), aged 16 and over, on the registers of Employment Exchanges.
22nd May, 1933.14th May, 1934.Decrease at 14th May, 1934, compared with 22nd May, 1933.
England10,505,6501,997,4381,561,770435,668
Wales621,620220,823202,63918,184
Scotland1,345,730364,618325,97238,646
As statistics of the n basis of information de insured persons are not numbers of insured persons are obtained only for July of each year, on the basis of information derived from the annual exchange of unemployment books, the numbers of insured persons are not yet available for 1934.

Kilmainham Hospital Trust

asked the Financial Secretary to the War Office why he is unable to say when the Kilmainham Hospital Trust will be wound up finally?

The trust cannot be wound up without further action on the part of the Irish Free State, probably in the form of legislation.

Royal Naval Reserve

asked the First Lord of the Admiralty what are the terms and conditions at present in force in respect of the payment of gratuities to skippers of the Royal Naval Reserve; and whether any alteration in such terms and conditions has been made since the year 1926, and to what effect?

countries; whether there has been an increase or decrease; and the numbers for each country?

The following table shows, for England, Wales and Scotland, separately, the estimated number of insured persons at July, 1933 (exclusive of those insured under the special schemes for the banking and insurance industries, for which separate figures are not available for England, Wales and Scotland); the numbers of unemployed persons, insured and uninsured, on the registers of Employment Exchanges at 22nd May, 1933, and 14th May, 1934; and the decrease in the numbers unemployed between these two dates.of discharge gratuities to skippers, Royal Naval Reserve, are laid down in Order in Council of 27th October, 1930, No. 70. This authority provides for the payment of proportionate gratuities under prescribed conditions to

  • (a) officers retired or discharged on or after 1st April, 1928, and before they are entitled to the full gratuity, on account of injury or sickness which is not due to their own imprudence or misconduct;
  • (b) the legal representative of any officer who may die while on the Active List as the result of injury or sickness which is not due to his own imprudence or misconduct;
  • (c) any officer to whom a deferred gratuity certificate has been issued and who is unfit for further service as a result of injury or sickness which is not due to his own imprudence or misconduct;
  • (d) the legal representative of any holder of a deferred gratuity certificate who may die before attaining the requisite age for the payment of the deferred gratuity.
  • These conditions of payment did not exist in 1926.

    Teachers' Pensions

    asked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Board of Education whether his attention has been called to the permanent hardship imposed upon teachers who retire during the years immediately following the recent economy cuts; and whether it is proposed that steps should be taken to restore to pensioners the full rate of pension as and when the salary cuts are restored?

    My Noble Friend would invite attention to the answer given to-day to the hon. Member for Spelthorne (Sir R. Blaker), of which he is sending his hon. Friend a copy.

    Taxation (United Kingdom And Foreign Countries)

    asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer in terms of sterling the amount of taxation per head of population in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy and the United States of America, respectively, on the latest available date?

    Data for a comparison including local taxation are not available for all the countries concerned. The amount of taxation per head for the central government only (excluding States governments in the United States and Germany) in the currencies of the countries concerned is stated below, but my hon. Friend will appreciate that calculations of this kind are an inadequate guide to the true burden.

    United Kingdom—£14 17s. 3d.

    France—1112 francs (£14 11s. 2d.* ).

    Germany—111 Reichsmarks (£8 7s. 10d.* ).

    Italy—387 lire (£6 12s. 4d.* ).

    United States—30 dollars (£5 19s.* ).

    * As the foreign figures relate to different 12-monttily periods which have not yet expired it will be obvious that there is no satisfactory method of stating them in sterling. The sterling equivalents given above are valid only for the rates of exchange current on 20th June.

    Marr Trust

    asked the Secretary of State for Scotland whether any settlement has been arrived at regarding the future of Marr College, Troon; and whether any date has been fixed for the opening of this college?

    As stated in my reply to the question put by the hon. and gallant Member for Ayr Burghs (Lieut.-Colonel Moore) on the 19th instant, I remitted the Marr Trust Scheme to the Commissioners, who have now decided that it would serve no material purpose to proceed further in the matter of making a scheme for the future government of the Marr Trust. Nothing now stands in the way of the opening of the college at the earliest date administratively possible, but I am not yet in a position to make any statement as to a definite date.