Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 291: debated on Monday 2 July 1934

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers

Road Accidents (Police, Training)

asked the Home Secretary whether, in view of the importance of accurate police evidence in the scientific investigation of road accidents, the training given on this subject to the cadets at the Metropolitan Police College is more detailed than that given to ordinary police constables; and whether it includes a practical study of road surfaces, lighting systems here and abroad, and other safety measures?

The course of training at the college covers all these points. During that course there is more opportunity to go fully into such matters than in the much shorter course at the training school for constables.

Public Meetings (Disturbances)

asked the Home Secretary whether he is aware that several trade union and some co-operative organisations joined with the Independent Labour party and the Communist party to organise a demonstration against the meeting held in the City Hall, Sheffield, on Thursday, 28th June, and addressed b. Sir Oswald Mosley; and, as the trade unions and co-operative organisations in question are affiliated to or connected with the Labour party, whether he represented to the deputation of the General Council of the Trades Union Congress and National Executive of the Labour party which he received on Tuesday, 26th June, that members of the Labour party and trade unions should not participate in the creation of disorder?

I took the occasion, when I recently received a deputation from the National Joint Council, representing the Trades Union Congress, the Labour party, and the Parliamentary Labour party, of stating emphatically that the Government are determined not to tolerate the creation of disorder from any quarter. The deputation assured me that for their part they equally deplored and discouraged unruliness and disorder at meetings.

asked the Home Secretary whether he has received a report from the Chief Constable of Sheffield in connection with the Fascist meeting held at Sheffield on Thursday night last; the number of police on duty at the hall and the number of members of the British Union of Fascists that were brought to Sheffield from outside areas; whether the police were invited inside the hall; whether the ambulance corps was a unit of the British Union of Fascists or the Sheffield unit of the St. John Ambulance Corps; the number of persons arrested and how many were injured; and if the major part of the meeting was orderly, and, if there was a disturbance, at what part of the meeting it took place, and what was the cause?

Yes, Sir; I have obtained a report from the Chief Constable of Sheffield regarding the Fascist meeting held in the City Hall on 28th June. Under the terms of the contract for the letting of the hall made between the City Corporation and the Fascists, the police were given full right of access inside the hall for the purpose of preserving order. In pursuance of this arrangement, a body of about 100 police were on duty inside the hall. The meeting was attended by about 2,500 persons and the Chief Constable informs me that there was no disorder inside the meeting apart from certain verbal interruptions. Four persons were ejected from the hall on account of persistent interruption, and these were escorted from the hall by police officers at the request of Fascist stewards who had previously requested the interrupters to desist. It is estimated that about 300 Fascist stewards were present in uniform, and these were engaged in showing the audience to their seats and in selling Fascist literature. Fascists attended the meeting from Liverpool, Leeds, Huddersfield, Leicester, Bradford and York, and from various small towns in the West Riding. A counter demonstration was held outside the hall in the place usually reserved for meetings at the west side of the City Hall. A body of about 75 foot police and nine mounted constables were employed in maintaining order and in marshalling the crowd, estimated at about 10,000, which congregated in the streets around the hall. The crowd was tactfully handled by the police and good order was maintained. Six persons were arrested in the streets adjoining the hall, four of whom were charged with assaults on the police, one with wilful damage, and one with drunkenness and disorderly conduct. No member of the public was assaulted or injured during the course of the meeting. In accordance with the usual practice, 10 members of the Sheffield St. John Ambulance unit attended the meeting, but the police are not aware whether any member of the ambulance corps of the British Union of Fascists was present.

Animals (Poisoning)

asked the Home Secretary how many cases of poisoning of dogs and other animals, respectively, were reported to the police during the 12 months prior to the latest available date?

Unemployment

Tbansitional Payments

asked the Minister of Labour what steps have been taken to give effect to the restoration of the cuts in transitional payments?

I am sending to the hon. Member a copy of the circular letter which was addressed to local authorities on 24th May. Copies of this letter have also been placed in the Vote Office.

Assistance Boaed

asked the Minister of Labour whether he can now state the composition of the Unemployment Assistance Board and at the same time indicate, in view of the approach of the holidays, what publicity will be given to the requirements of the board in respect of staff, so that those interested may not miss the announcements made?

The membership of the Unemployment Assistance Board was announced by the Prime Minister on 29th June in reply to a question by the hon. Member for Chester-le-Street (Mr. Lawson). The appointment of staff is a matter for the board itself, but I have no doubt that steps will be taken to ensure that the board's requirements in respect of staff are brought effectively to the notice of all concerned at the earliest possible date.

National Health Insurance

asked the Minister of Health whether he is aware that in the case of an employer who has collected from his employés contributions to National Health Insurance by making deductions from wages each week and, having failed to stamp the insurance cards, becomes bankrupt, the employés are refused sick benefit on the ground that the contributions have not been paid for the specified period; and Whether he will consider the desirability of making provision that in such cases the workmen shall not be deprived of sick benefit?

Under National Health Insurance the benefits of insured persons are not payable out of a central fund as in the case of Unemployment Insurance, but out of the funds of the approved societies and branches, of which there are 7,000, each being a separate independent financial unit. A society cannot, therefore, be required to pay benefit unless the necessary contributions have been paid into its funds. There is an interval of six months between the end of a contribution year and the beginning of the corresponding benefit year, and this enables the position with regard to any missing contributions to be adjusted in the majority of cases before any loss of benefit to the insured person can arise, particularly as unpaid insurance contributions are treated as preferential debts in bankruptcy.

London Refuse (Disposal)

asked the Minister of Health whether the advisory committee on London refuse have yet reached any conclusions for the improvement of the disposal of refuse; and what action the Ministry of Health propose taking in the matter?

I understand that the draft of an interim report is now being considered by the Committee. I hope that the Committee can complete this report at an early date.

Royal Air Force (Pension Appeals)

asked the Under-Secretary of State for Air how many men invalided from the service in 1933 and denied pensions on the ground of non-attributability appealed to the Air Ministry against the original decision; and in how many cases was the decision modified?

Twenty airmen so appealed, and in one case the decision was modified.

Agricultural Marketing Boards (Members' Remuneration)

asked the Minister of Agriculture whether the chairmen and deputy-chairmen and other officers of the various boards set up under the marketing schemes are remunerated; and, if so, whether he will give the name of each member and his official position and the remuneration received?

The agricultural marketing schemes now in operation provide that the remuneration, if any, of the board, shall be determined by the registered producers in general meeting. In the case of the hops, pigs, bacon and milk marketing schemes, general meetings of registered producers have voted remuneration as follows to members of those boards for the periods stated:—

Hops Marketing Board.
1st April, 1933—31st March, 1934.
£
Mr. W. J. Woolrich, Chairman800
3 Special Members400 each.
14 Elected Members200 each.
(In addition, one of the special members received an allowance of £133 6s. 8d. for acting as chairman for four months.)
Pigs Marketing Board.
1st July, 1933–31st March, 1934.
£
Captain E. T. Morris, Chairman600
Mr. S. O. Ratcliff, Vice Chairman400
5 Members of Executive Committee270 each.
12 Board members220 each.
Bacon Marketing Board.
1st July, 1933–31st March, 1934.
£
Mr. A. E. Marsh, Chairman250
Mr. J. F. Bodinnar, Vice Chairman250
Mr. H. Martin Lewis250
13 Board members100 each.
Milk Marketing Board.
29th July, 1933–30th June, 1934.
£
Mr. T. Baxter, Chairman1,200
Mr. J. L. Walton, Vice Chairman700
16 Board members350each.
A general meeting of producers registered under the Scottish milk marketing scheme voted an inclusive sum of £2,500 to the board for the period 26th May, 1933, to 16th May, 1934, to be divided as the board may determine. The chairman of the board is the Earl of Stair.