Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 295: debated on Thursday 22 November 1934

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers

Vaccination

asked the Home Secretary what is the yearly number of persons proceeded against under the Vaccination Acts for the last 10 years for which the records are available; how many orders to vaccinate were made each year; and how many persons were fined under either Section 29 or Section 31 of the Vaccination Act, 1867?

During the ten years from 1924 to 1933, the number of persons proceeded against in England and Wales for offences against the Vaccination Acts, 1867 to 1907, the number of such persons fined, and the number of orders directing vaccination made under Section 31 of the. Act of 1867 were as follow:

Year.Number of persons proceeded against.Number fined.Number of orders to vaccinate.
1924246155255
1925221143192
1926176118138
1927148114136
1928182131185
192912910082
19301198573
1931735265
1932876576
193311810043

asked the Minister of Health whether he is aware of the death of Winifred Annie Edwards, aged 20 years, a nurse at the Birmingham Hospital, who died at the Queen's Hospital, Birmingham, on 16th October, from post- vaccinal encephalomyelitis; that Professor Haswell Wilson, a pathologist at Birmingham University, stated the condition to be due to a reaction of the vaccine and that the girl would probably not have died if she had not been vaccinated; what kind of lymph was used; whether he is aware that Miss Edwards was vaccinated in order to take up a position at a Sheffield institution; whether the Sheffield institution make vaccination a condition of employment; and whether there is any possibility of compensation being paid to Miss Edward's relatives?

The answer to the first, second, third, fifth and sixth parts of the question is in the affirmative. I understand that the lymph used in this case was supplied by "Dr. Renner's" establishment which is licensed under the Therapeutic Substances Act for the manufacture of lymph. I am not aware of any enactment under which compensation could be paid in such a case.

Imported Butter (Marking)

asked the Minister of Agriculture whether his attention has been drawn to the unfair competition caused by the sale of Danish butter which has been cold-stored without any statement to that effect at the time of sale, thus misleading the public; and what action is being taken in the matter?

All imported butter when exposed for sale in this country, has to bear an indication of origin and all imported Danish butter is, in fact, so marked. Accordingly, I do not think that there is any reason for further action in the matter.

His Majesty's Judges

asked the Prime Minister whether he proposes to table proposals for the fixing of a compulsory retirement age for His Majesty's judges?

His Majesty's Government propose to refer this question, amongst others, for the consideration of those undertaking the investigation to which my right hon. and learned Friend referred on 1st November last.

Unemployment Act (Appointed Days)

asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer whether he is aware that many local authorities were under an impression, based upon the financial memorandum and terms of Clause 44 of the draft Bill, that the Unemployment Assistance Board would take over the transferred duties soon after 30th June, 1934, and accordingly levied rates for 1934–35 which will prove insufficient, as the date for the transfer of duties is now fixed at 1st March, 1935; and whether he will consider placing local authorities in the financial position they would have occupied had the date of transfer been fixed at 1st October, 1934?

I am not aware of anything in the financial memorandum or Clause 44 of the draft Unemployment Bill which gave any indication that the appointed days under that Bill would be as early as my hon. and learned Friend suggests. As regards the last part of his question, I am not in a position to add anything to the reply given by my right hon. Friend the Chancellor of the Exchequer on 1st November to questions by the hon. Members for Wallsend (Miss Ward) and Dunfermline (Mr. J. Wallace).

Government Departments (Accountants)

asked the Financial Secretary to the Treasury if he will consider whether the present conditions governing appointments to the Civil Service can be modified to allow chartered and incorporated accountants the same opportunities of admission as are open to members of the legal, medical, dental, veterinary, architectural and engineering professions?

I would refer my hon. and gallant Friend to the reply given by my predecessor on 6th March, 1933, to the hon. Member for Westhoughton (Mr. Rhys Davies), a copy of which I am sending to him.

Rubber Industry (Restriction Scheme)

asked the Secretary of State for the Colonies whether the Dutch authorities have made any proposals for the termination of the rubber restriction scheme?

Cost-Of-Living Index Figure Bacon)

asked the Minister of Labour what method is adopted in procuring the average retail price of bacon for use in the cost-of-living figure evolved by his Department; whether the price obtained is that for large quantities sold retail or for small sliced quantities of 1 lb. or less; and whether he is aware that there is great difficulty in procuring at the average shop bacon at the average retail prices given as official?

The average retail price of bacon, as ascertained for the purpose of the official cost-of-living index figure, is based on the prices charged by about 1,000 retailers, distributed throughout Great Britain and Northern Ireland, supplying working-class customers. The prices quoted are for streaky bacon, sliced, per lb., except in localities where streaky bacon is seldom sold, in which cases the prices quoted relate to other cuts locally representative. As regards the last part of the question, prices vary considerably in different localities, and with different retailers, but I have no reason to think that the figure, namely, 1s. 2¼d. per lb., published for 1st November is unrepresentative as a general average.

Army Training Schools (Candidates' Examination)

asked the Financial Secretary to the War Office whether he is aware that candidates for the Army training schools sat for examination on 3rd July and were not told of the result till 11th October, thus preventing unsuccessful candidates from seeking other careers for over three months; and whether he will endeavour to expedite the procedure in such examinations in future?

I am aware that the facts are as stated in the first part of the question. The examinations for apprentice tradesmen, which are competitive, are held simultaneously at various centres at home and abroad, and some delay necessarily occurs pending receipt of the examination papers from overseas. Steps are, however, being taken to make more extended use of the Air Mail from India and China; and these, it is hoped, will considerably reduce the interval between the examinations and the publication of the results.

Education

New Non-Provided Schools

asked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Board of Education whether there has been any change in the policy of the Board of Education concerning sanctions to build new non-provided schools?

The Board's policy in the matter, as in the case of proposed new provided schools, is deter mined by the three considerations, to which they are required by Section 19 (1) of the Education Act, 1921, to have regard, namely, the interest of secular instruction, the wishes of the parents as to the education of their children, and the economy of the rates.

Church Schools (Closing)

asked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Board of Education how many church schools have been closed under the provisions of the Education (Necessity of Schools) Act, 1933; and how many cases are under consideration?

The infants' department of one Church of England school has been closed under the provisions of the Necessity of Schools Act. Two other cases of the proposed closure of Church of England schools are under consideration.

Royal Navy (Health Insurance)

asked the First Lord of the Admiralty the number of serving naval ratings who are members of health insurance approved societies and the number who are not; what is the possible membership of the suggested naval approved society for serving and ex-service ratings and marines; how many branch offices are proposed; whether the head office is to be in London; and whether he can state the proposed salaries of the various officials?

On 31st December, 1933, the latest date for which information is available, 36,000 out of a total of 82,500 serving ratings were not members of approved societies. I am not yet in a position to supply the rest of the information asked for by the hon. Member.

asked the First Lord of the Admiralty what progress has been made with the proposal to form a national health insurance society within the trust of the Royal Naval Benevolent Trust since the annual meeting of 1933; under what part of the charter this scheme would be framed; whether it will be necessary to take any Parliamentary action; whether the lower deck is to be consulted and when; what officials of the Admiralty were present at the discussions with representatives of the trust at the Admiralty on Monday, 12th November, 1934; and what transpired at that conference?

This subject was discussed at the Admiralty with representatives of the Royal Naval Benevolent Trust on 12th November. The proceedings were informal, but the main object of the meeting was to give in- formation to the proposers of the scheme as to some of the difficulties in its realisation. As these appear to be of a serious nature, the further matters of detail have not so far been considered. As a direct outcome of the meeting, it is hoped that steps can be taken with a view to reducing the number of serving men who are not members of approved societies.

asked the First Lord of the Admiralty the amount of capital in the possession of the Royal Naval Benevolent Trust; the amount required to start the proposed health insurance approved society; the amount proposed to be borrowed from the trust for this purpose; whether the charter of the trust permits of part of its capital, which is earmarked for benevolent. purposes, being used for competitive health insurance purposes; and, in the event of failure, how it is proposed to safeguard the moneys of the trust and ensure the continuation of the benevolent work for which the trust was formed?

According to their annual report for 1934, the amount of capital in possession of the Royal Naval Benevolent Trust (including minor trusts) was £450,000 approximately. As I told the hon. Member in my reply to his previous question, the further matters of detail have not yet been considered.