Written Answers
Germany And Austria (Armies)
asked the Secretary of State for War whether he has any information showing the number of trained men and reserves in the armies of Germany and Austria capable of being called up and equipped within one month?
I understand the German. Government are aiming at a peace-time Army of 550,000 trained men, while Austria has about 35,000 trained men at the present time. I have no information as to reserves or as to the availability of equipment.
Measles (Inoculation)
asked the Minister of Health (1) whether he is aware that comparative passive immunisation experiments with placental extract and convalescent measles serum on 69 children have been carried out by Dr. A. Joe at the North-Western Hospital, Hampstead; and whether such experimentation on children sent into the fever hospitals with scarlet fever, diphtheria, or whooping cough has received the approval of his Department;(2) whether the parents of the 69 children experimented upon by Dr. Alexander Joe at the North-Western Hospital, Hampstead, with placental extract and convalescent measles serum had previously given their consent to these experiments?
I am informed that both kinds of serum have been used at this hospital during the recent epidemic, but I am advised that as both are known to be of definite value their use cannot be regarded as experimental, although comparative observations were made of the results. No approval by my Department was required. I understand that the consent of the parents was not obtained as the administration of serum to susceptible children who may be incubating measles is regarded by the hospital authorities as part of the necessary treatment.
Slaughter Of Animals
asked the Minister of Health the number of local authorities in England and Wales who have statutory power to adopt the Ministry of Health's model by-law 9b, with reference to the humane slaughter of animals, and who have not done so; and whether he would give particulars?
This matter is now in the main governed by the Slaughter of Animals Act, 1933, which came into force on the 1st of January, 1934, and applies to the slaughter of cattle and where a source of electrical supply is available to the slaughter of pigs. The Act may, also, by resolution of the local authority, be applied to the slaughter of sheep. Out of 1,507 local authorities who have power to pass such a resolution, 920 have done so. The Act in effect supersedes these by-laws as regards cattle, and also as regards sheep in areas in which sheep have been brought within the scope of the Act by resolution and as regards pigs in areas in which a source of electrical supply is available. By-laws relating to the slaughter of pigs in areas in which a source of electrical supply is not available have been made by 27 further authorities since the Act came into operation.
Canadian National Exhibition
asked the Secretary to the Overseas Trade Department whether, and to what extent, His Majesty's Gov- ernment will co-operate in the forthcoming Canadian National Exhibition at Toronto?
The Department of Overseas Trade, both in this country and through His Majesty's Trade Commissioners in Canada, is doing all that it can to assist in bringing the exhibition to the notice of British firms who may wish to participate. His Majesty's Government will, as in past years, maintain an Information Bureau at the Exhibition.
Public Assistance Statistics
asked the Minister of Health whether he can give the number of persons in receipt of poor relief on the 1st January, 1936, and the corresponding number for the 1st January, 1935?
The number of persons in receipt of poor relief on 1st January, 1936, was 1,387,720, not including 117,993 rate-aided patients in mental hospitals. The corresponding figures on 1st January, 1935, were 1,472,891 and 116,165.
Stirling Town Council (By-Laws)
asked the Secretary of State for Scotland whether he is aware that the Stiring Town Council have given notice to Mr. Donald Whyte, of 1, Sunnyside, St. Ninians, Stirling, to cease keeping pigs, which are his only source of livelihood; that they refuse to pay any compensation; that, suffering from effects of Army service, it is claimed he is unfitted for ordinary employment; can he state under which Act or by-law the foregoing notice has been served; and whether he will arrange with the town council to pay this man compensation for disturbance and loss of livelihood?
Notices were issued by the town council of Stirling in October last to Mr. Whyte and other pig-keepers in the burgh, that in terms of bylaws made by the council in 1901 under the Burgh Police (Scotland) Act, 1892, and the Public Health (Scotland) Act, 1897, of which I am sending a copy to the hon. Member, it is an offence to keep pigs within 75 feet of any house or other place frequented by the public. Since he received that notice, Mr. Whyte has ceased to use one pigsty the situation of which was in contravention of the bylaws, and I understand that the council are considering whether any action is necessary as regards other premises. There is no statutory authority for the payment of compensation in such cases.
Milk Products (Imports)
asked the Minister of Agriculture whether his attention has been drawn to the resolution passed by the executive committee of the Kent branch of the National Farmers Union, expressing alarm at the increasing amounts of the inter-regional compensation levy that milk producers in the southeastern region are called upon to pay, and urging that the Government should introduce at the earliest date a long-term policy in regard to the imposition of a levy subsidy on imported milk products with a view to maintaining an economic price for manufactured milk and alleviating the amount of the inter-regional compensation levy; and whether he has any statement to make upon the subject of such resolution?
I have seen the resolution to which reference is made. A general indication of the policy of the Government in regard to imports of milk products was given in a statement made on 25th July last, a copy of which I am sending to my hon. Friend. The present position of the home milk industry in relation to imports of milk products is safeguarded until October, 1937, by the Milk Act, 1934, and the Milk (Extension of Temporary Provisions) Act, 1936, which provide, inter alia, for Exchequer advances to improve the price of milk used for manufacture. The dairy produce situation will be reviewed and the Government's long-term policy determined before that date. The position with regard to condensed milk and milk powder will be considered on receipt of the report of the Import Duties Advisory Committee on the application now before them for an increase in the duties of imports of these products.
Performing Dogs
asked the Minister of Agriculture what steps are taken by him to ensure that performing dogs, permitted by licence to land in this country, subject to quarantine, not on approved veterinary premises but on the premises at which they are to perform, are kept in places suitable for the purpose and under conditions providing for their care, comfort, and proper exercise; and whether the dogs while there are inspected by any veterinary or other officer on his behalf and at what intervals?
Imported performing dogs are not licensed for quarantine at premises at which they are to perform unless such premises have been previously inspected by officers of the Ministry and found to be suitable for the proper detention of the dogs. While the dogs are on the premises inspections are made, without warning, and normally every week, by inspectors of the Ministry and of the appropriate local authority.
Nursery Schools
asked the President of the Board of Education the number and location of nursery schools in this country?
A list of the 78 nursery schools in England and Wales recognised by the Board of Education will be found on pages 53 and 54 of the Board's List 42, of which I am sending a copy to my hon. Friend.
Jibuti-Addis Ababa Railway
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether the Jibuti French-controlled railway is now being used for the transport of Italian troops and munitions?
I have no reason to believe that Italian troops and munitions are being landed at Jibuti. As regards that part of the railway which lies in Ethiopian territory now under Italian military control, I have no reliable information of any kind.
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether the shares in the Jibuti Railway, transferred from French to Italian ownership in January, 1935, carried any rights of management or control?
While I understand that the agreement of January, 1935, between France and Italy in regard to the Jibuti Railway involved the transfer to Italian interests of approximately one-sixteenth of the share capital, and the right to one seat on the board, I am not aware of the extent of participation in the management which this involves.
Protectorates And Mandated Territories
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs the names of all the protectorates and mandated territories held by Great Britain and the terms of such mandates?
The following is a list of the British Protectorates:
- Bechuanaland Protectorate.
- Swaziland.
- Northern Rhodesia.
- Nyasaland Protectorate.
- Somaliland Protectorate.
- Uganda Protectorate.
- Zanzibar.
- Aden Protectorate.
- British Solomon Islands Protectorate.
- Kenya Protectorate.
- Gambia Protectorate.
- The northern territories of the Gold Coast.
- Nigeria Protectorate.
- Sierra Leone Protectorate.
International Red Cross
asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether he will obtain the names of the members of the executive committee of the International Red Cross with whom the League of Nations has recently been in correspondence, and the countries of which they are citizens?
According to "The International Red Cross," a publication produced by the League of Red Cross Societies, the names of the members of the International Red Cross Committee are as follow:
Members.
Professor Max Huber, Doctor of Law, Former Chairman of the Permanent International Court of Justice, President.
Dr. Georges Patry, Colonel and Physician of the 1st Division of the Swiss Army, Vice-President.
Colonel Guillaume Favre, Vice-President.
M. Rodolphe de Haller, Banker, Treasurer.
Professor Paul des Gouttes, Doctor of Law, Barrister.
Colonel Edmond Boissier.
Professor Bernard Bouvier, honorary professor of Geneva University.
M. Jacques Chenevière, Man of Letters.
Professor Paul Logoz, Doctor of Law, Professor of Penal Law at Geneva University.
Dr. Lucien Cramer, Doctor of Law.
Dr. Guiseppe Motta, Doctor of Law, Federal Councillor.
Mlle. Suzanne Ferrière, Secretary of the International Migration Service.
Dr. G. E. Audeoud, former Divisional Surgeon of the Swiss Army.
Mlle. Lucie Odier, former Chief of the Public Health Nursing Service of the Genevese Red Cross.
Colonel Franz Rodolphe de Planta.
Dr. Heinrich Zangger, University Professor and Director of the Zurich Institute of Legal Medicine.
Prof. Carl J Burckhart, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor at the University Institute of International Study, Geneva.
M. Jacques-Barthélemy Micheli, Engineer.
Honorary Members.
H.E. M. Frédéric Barbey-Ador, Swiss Minister in Brussels.
Mme. Ed. Frick-Cramer.
All these persons appear to be of Swiss nationality.
India
Court-Martial (Lieut-Colonel Sandford)
asked the Secretary of State for War whether he is aware that Major Sandford was ordered to be tried by general court-martial in India, in January, 1934; that Rule of Procedure 21 (B), made under the Army Act, prescribes certain limitations with regard to the rank of officers qualified to act as members of a general court-martial; that during his trial Major Sandford was gazetted to the rank of lieut.-colonel, and that three officers of junior rank to Lieut.-Colonel Sandford continued to sit as members of the court-martial and adjudicate in the case; and why a new court was not convened and a re-trial ordered?
The Court which tried Mr. Sandford was properly convened in accordance with the Army Act and Rule of Procedure 21 (B). Mr. Sandford was gazetted Lieut.-Colonel during the currency of the trial, but there is no provision in the Army Act which in these circumstances rendered necessary the convening of a new Court or the ordering of a fresh trial.
asked the Secretary of State for War whether he is aware that Lieut.-Colonel H. R. Sandford in India submitted a petition to the commander-in-chief in India, and was nevertheless convicted by court-martial on all five charges; that he was sentenced to be dismissed the service; that he then petitioned the Army Council, as the result of which four of the five charges were quashed; that the sentence passed by the court-martial was modified in compliance with Rule of Procedure 54 (B); will he state the reasons why the provisions of this rule have not been complied with; and whether, seeing that the convicted and dismissed officer was granted an award of retired pay although the sentence of dismissal from service was not modified, he will state under what regulation this award was made?
I am aware that Mr. Sandford was convicted by court-martial in India on two charges of forgery and three charges of uttering forged documents, and was sentenced to be dismissed from His Majesty's service. In the normal course of subsequent review in this country, the Judge-Advocate-General advised that, on technical grounds of law, four of these charges should be set aside, and this was accordingly done. The prescribed authorities took into consideration, as required by Rule of Procedure 54 (B), the question of mitigating the sentence, and decided, in view of all the circumstances and the gravity of the case, that it would not be just to effect any mitigation. I am aware that petitions, both in India and in this country, have been submitted by Mr. Sandford since his trial, and have been exhaustively considered by the responsible authorities. An award of retired pay was made by the Army Council under Articles 548 of the Royal Warrant for the pay, etc., of the Army, 1931. This award was subsequently replaced by a compassionate allowance made by the Secretary of State for India in Council.
asked the Secretary of State for War, in the case of the trial of Colonel Sandford by general court-martial in India, whether a summary of evidence was taken under provisions of military law previous to the accused officer being handed over by the civil authority for trial under military law; if so, whether such procedure is in accordance with the rules prescribed by the Government of India; and will he state the name of the officer by whose order the civil police were requested to register a case under the Indian civil law against the accused officer, the name of the officer who investigated the charges, the name of the officer who ordered a summary of evidence to be taken and subsequently remanded the accused officer for trial by court-martial, the name of the officer who convened the general court-martial, and the name of the officer who, during the period 13th November to 8th December, 1933, carried out the duties which should normally have been performed by the accused's commanding officer?
Mr. Sandford was not "handed over" by the civil authorities. In the initial stages the case was referred to the civil authorities by Lieutenant-General Sir T. G. Matheson, General Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Western Command, India, as it was considered essential that their assistance should be sought as most of the witnesses were civilians. When the case was registered by the civil authorities, Mr. Sandford was "claimed" for trial by the military authorities in accordance with law, and a summary, of evidence, having been ordered by the General Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Western Command, India, was taken by Captain Carey, a staff officer of that command. In due course the charges upon which Mr. Sandford was tried came before the Officer Commanding, 1st Battalion, The Devonshire Regiment, who signed the charge sheet as commanding officer and thereby approved the charges for trial. Mr. Sandford was at that time attached to the 1st Battalion, The Devonshire Regiment. The court was convened by the General Officer Commanding-in-Chief, Western Command, India. The commanding officer of Mr. Sandford from the 13th November to the 8th December, 1933, was Brigadier J. C. McKenna, Commander, Zhob Independent Area, India.
Gold Coast (Aborigines Protection)
asked the Secretary of State for the Colonies (1) what was the reason for the refusal of the request for a copy of the shorthand notes taken at the interview with the delegates of the Gold Coast Aborigines Rights Protection Society at the Colonial Office on 16th August, 1935;(2) why, contrary to precedent and the courtesy which had previously been extended to delegations to the Colonial Office from the Gold Coast, including those of the society, the solicitors of the Gold Coast Aborigines Rights Protection Society were refused attendance at the interview with the delegates of the society?
The purpose of the interview was primarily to enable the delegates to state their views on the questions raised in their petitions, and it was decided that in the circumstances the preferable course would be for them not to be accompanied by their legal adviser. No shorthand note was taken at the interview.
International Labour Conventions
asked the Minister of Labour in respect of each of the International Labour Office Conventions which have not so far been ratified by the British Government, what the intentions of the Government are and, in those instances where ratification is to take place, how soon this will be done?
I would refer the hon. Member to Appendix XIX of the Annual Report of the Ministry of Labour for 1933, which shows the position in regard to draft international labour conventions on 31st December, 1933, and to Command Papers Nos. 5078, 5113 and 5141 which show further developments since that date. In addition, the Hours of Employment (Conventions) Bill now before the House is intended to enable the conventions concerning the employment of women during the night (revised 1934) and the regulation of hours in automatic sheet-glass works to be ratified. In the cases where His Majesty's Government has decided to ratify draft conventions, the formal procedure necessary to effect such ratification is being carried out as speedily as possible.
Share Transactions (Stamp Duty)
asked the Chancellor of the Exchequer the cost to the Exchequer in issuing transfer deeds free to the public for the period 1st April, 1925, to 31st March, 1936, and of the concession granted to stock exchange firms under Section 42 of the Finance Act, 1920, and
| — | Duty, if exigible at £1 per cent. | Exigible and paid under Section 42. | Difference. |
| £ | £ | £ | |
| London Stock Exchange | 927,696 | 143,169 | 784,527 |
| Birmingham Stock Exchange | 1,233 | 271 | 962 |
| Bristol Stock Exchange | 3,190 | 1,085 | 2,105 |
| Halifax Stock Exchange | 144 | 43 | 101 |
| Huddersfield Stock Exchange | 208 | 14 | 194 |
| Leeds Stock Exchange | 409 | 113 | 296 |
| Liverpool Stock Exchange | 1.096 | 232 | 864 |
| Manchester Stock Exchange | 1,403 | 427 | 976 |
| Mincing Lane Exchange | 314 | 155 | 159 |
| Nottingham Stock Exchange | 206 | 27 | 179 |
| Sheffield Stock Exchange | 9,860 | 2,228 | 7,632 |
| Provincial Brokers Stock Exchange | 5,918 | 716 | 5,202 |
| (a) Total for period 1st April, 1935, to 31st March, 1936. | 951,677 | 148,480 | 803,197 |
| (b)Total from 1st September, 1920, to 31st March, 1936. | 9,096,865 | 1,693,032 | 7,403,833 |
Royal Navy
Clyde, Tyne And Barrow (Shipbuilding Contracts)
asked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Admiralty the value of naval shipbuilding allocated to the Clyde,
the amendment of 1931 for the same period; the extent to which each stock exchange has taken advantage of that privilege; the aggregate totals since that section operated; and whether he will consider reviewing the concession with a view to ultimate withdrawal?
The cost of the transfer forms issued free to the public in the period from 1st April, 1935, to 31st March, 1936, was approximately £975. The following table shows (a) the effect over the same period of the operation of Section 42 of the Finance Act, 1920, as amended by the Finance Act, 1931, and (b) the aggregate total from 1st September, 1920, when that Section came into operation, to 31st March, 1936. The question appears to be founded on some misapprehension—Section 42 of the Finance Act, 1920, does not stand alone and to speak of its "cost" is misleading. It is associated with the increased Stamp Duties imposed in that year on Stock Exchange transactions and the relief it confers is incidental to obtaining the additional revenues.Tyne and Barrow, respectively, in the programmes for the period 1909–10 to 1913–14, and the yearly average of each for such period; and also the value of the tonnage now under construction on the Clyde, Tyne and Barrow, respectively?
The following statement gives the particulars:
| Year. | Approximate value of Admiralty orders for Hulls and Machinery. | ||
| Clyde. | Tyne. | Barrow. | |
| £ | £ | £ | |
| (millions). | (millions). | (millions). | |
| 1909–10 | 3½ | 2½ | 1¾ |
| 1910–11 | 3½ | 2¼ | ¾ |
| 1911–12 | 3 | 1¼ | 1¼ |
| 1912–13 | 4½ | 2½ | 1 |
| 1913–14 | 2¼ | 3½ | 1¼ |
| Yearly average. | 3¼ | 2½ | 1¾ |
| At present in hand. | 8½ | 5 | 1¾ |
Battleship Construction
asked the Parliamentary Secretary to the Admiralty whether he is yet in a position to state in which yards the two battleships whose construction is projected will be built?
No, Sir.
American States (Migration)
asked the Minister of Labour what measures, if any, have been taken to carry out the resolution of the Labour Conference of American States to request the governing body of the International Office to have special inquiries made in connection with migration from Europe to America?
The resolutions of the Labour Conference of American States, including the resolution referred to by the hon. Member, were submitted to the governing body of the International Labour Office in April last, and it was announced that a mission from the Office would proceed to South America, probably in July next, to study the question of migration from Europe to America.