Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 320: debated on Wednesday 10 February 1937

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers

Unemployment

Scunthorpe

asked the Minister of Labour whether he will state the number of insured persons in the Scunthorpe area at December for each of the years 1920, 1930, and 1936?

Estimates of the numbers of insured persons in particular localities can be made only for July of each year, on the basis of the information derived from the annual exchange of unemployment books. The following table gives for July, 1923, the earliest date for which comparable figures are available, and for July, 1930, and July, 1936, the estimated numbers insured within the area of the Scunthorpe Employment Exchange:

Estimated Numbers Insured.
July, 1923.
Aged 16 years and over11,580
July, 1930.
Aged 16–6413,560
July, 1936.*
Aged 16–6416,290
Aged 14 and 15840
* The figures do not include persons insured under the agricultural scheme.

Benefit Disallowed (Brixton)

asked the Minister of Labour whether he will state the number of claims for benefit disallowed by the Court of Referees at the Brixton Employment Exchange during the past year?

The number of claims for insurance benefit and unemployment allowances disallowed by the Court of Referees sitting at the Brixton Employment Exchange during 1936 was 2,769. This figure relates to claims, and statistics showing the number of separate individuals concerned are not available. The total is exclusive of (a) cases considered under the trade dispute disqualification and (b) claims, by persons already entitled to benefit, for an increase in the rate of benefit in respect of dependants.

Disabled Ex-Service Men

asked the Minister of Labour how many disabled ex-service men were registered at Employment Exchanges as unemployed on the last date on which inquiry was made; and what was their then classification for industrial purposes?

The following is the information required:

Number of Disabled Ex-Service Men registered at Employment Exchanges in Great Britain on 4th January, 1937:
Category A.18,565
Category B.13,350
Category C.396
Total32,311
The categories A, B and C are defined as follows:
Category A.—Those whose disability would not prevent them from returning to their usual occupation or to an analogous occupation, under ordinary industrial or commercial conditions, after training, if necessary.
Category B.—Those whose disability would prevent them from returning to their usual occupation, but would not preclude them from employment under ordinary industrial or commercial conditions, on what might be described as a light job.
Category C.—Those whose disability renders it difficult for them to be employed under ordinary industrial or commercial conditions except in some institution specially designed for ex-service men suffering from very severe occupational disability.

asked the Minister of Labour what was the percentage of unemployment among disabled ex-service men when inquiry was last made and on what date; and what was the approximate proportion of unemployment among all insured males in approximately the same age groups on the same date?

The number of disabled ex-service men registered as unemployed in Great Britain on the 4th January, 1937, represented 8.1 per cent. Of the estimated number of men in receipt of disability pensions and disability allowances. The percentage rate of unemployment among insured men aged 21ߝ64 in Great Britain on 25th January, 1937 (the nearest date for which figures are available), was 15 per cent. The percentage of unemployment among insured men aged 40ߝ65 is not known, but such information as is available suggests that it is higher than the figure for men aged 21–64.

Durham (Statistics)

asked the Minister of Labour the number of applicants who received unemployment benefit in the administrative county of Durham,

Statistics showing the numbers of separate individuals making application for unemployment benefit in a year in particular areas are not available. The following Table, however, shows the average weekly number of payments of unemployment benefit made direct through Employment Exchanges in the areas mentioned in each of the years, 1931 to 1936—
Year.Administrative County of Durham.County Borough of Sunderland.County Borough of South Shields.County Borough of Gateshead.
1931 (52 weeks)71,43119,10410,8329,560
1932 (52 weeks)35,8056,6374,9253,835
1933 (52 weeks)24,5595,4544,5363,086
1934 (52 weeks)17,8556,1014,1892,748
1935 (52 weeks)22,6685,6914,6393,006
1936 (53 weeks)14,9104,7364,1642,309
The following Table shows the approximate amounts paid in unemployment benefit direct through Employment Exchanges in the same areas in each of the years 1931 to 1936—
Year.Administrative County of Durham.County Borough of Sunderland.County Borough of South Shields.County Borough of Gateshead.
££££
1931 (52 weeks)3,947,1341,062,108599,248499,623
1932 (52 weeks)1,563,306311,102232,778165,629
1933 (52 weeks)1,002,977229,926209,420133,844
1934 (52 weeks)808,660283,329200,685126,592
1935 (52 weeks)1,122,308286,106236,345145,619
1936 (53 weeks)839,133230,136216,391111,237
Notes
(1) The comparability of the figures for 1931 with those for later years is ffected by the introduction of the Transitional Payments Scheme in November, 1931.
(2) The above figures do not include payments made through Associations, of which a geographical analysis is not available. The number of these, however, is relatively small.
(3) The figures for 1936 do not include payments of benefit under the Agricultural Scheme.

Ex-Service Men (King's National Roll)

asked the Minister of Labour how many employers and local authorities, respectively, were enrolled on the King's National Roll in September, 1936, as compared with September, 1926; how many disabled ex-service men were employed thereunder at each date; and what percentage they approximately represent of men at present in receipt of disability pensions or allowances?

On 6th September, 1926, 27,592 employers were enrolled on the King's National Roll; they employed 378,484 disabled ex-service men. This number represented 87.4 per cent. of the

the county boroughs of Sunderland, Gateshead, and South Shields, each year from 1931 to 1936; and the amount paid to the unemployed in these areas during the same period?

pursuant to his reply (OFFICIAL REPORT, 28th January, 1937; col. 1040, Vol. 319), supplied the following statement:estimated number of men then in receipt of disability pensions and disability allowances. On 5th October, 1936, 23,586 employers, including 22,592 firms and 987 local authorities, were members of the Roll and employed 317,891 disabled ex-service men. This figure represents 79.9 per cent. of the estimated number of disabled men at present in receipt of disability pensions and disability allowances. Separate figures for the numbers of firms and local authorities respectively enrolled in September, 1926, are not available.

asked the Minister of Labour how many firms in Wolverhampton were on the. King's Roll of Honour on 31st December, 1936, and how many are not on it?

On the 31st December, 1936, 83 firms in the Wolverhampton area, employing 25 or more workpeople, and 40 firms employing less than 25 work-people, were enrolled on the King's Roll. 228 firms in the area, employing 25 or more workpeople, were not enrolled. The number of smaller firms not enrolled is not known.

Coal Industry (Miners' Hours And Wages)

asked the Secretary for Mines whether he will provide a statement showing the length of the working-day for mine-workers, above and below ground, respectively, in all coal-producing countries?

Separate particulars as regards underground and surface workers are not available. Information as to hours of work for underground workers is contained on pages 31 and 32 of the Blue-Grey Report entitled "Reduction of Hours of Work" (Vol. V, Coal Mines) published by the International Labour Office in 1935. I am sending

Average Daily Earnings* at Coal Mines in the principal coal-producing countries.
Country.Period.Currency.Amount.
Below-ground.Above-groundAbove- and below-ground.
Great BritainJuly-Sept., 1936Sterling.Not available10s. 4½d.
Germany:
RuhrOctober, 1936.ReichsmarksNot available7.15
AachenOctober, 1936.Reichsmarks6.46
Upper SilesiaOctober, 1936.Reichsmarks5.71
Lower Silesia.October, 1936.Reichsmarks5.60
SaxonyOctober, 1936.Reichsmarks6.20
SaarOctober, 1936.Reichsmarks7.09
FranceApril-June, 1936Francs36.5428.1133.59
BelgiumYear. 1935Francs38.8328.9935.68
NetherlandsOctober, 1936Florins5.023.804.56
PolandMarch, 1936Zlotys8.557.458.06
CzechoslovakiaYear, 1934Korunas46.6037.8039.83
RussiaYear, 1934RoublesNot available4.65
Bulgaria†July, 1935Levas68.6264.3867.94
Canada†Year, 1935DollarsNot available4.46
JapanMarch, 1935YenNot availableMales I.756
Females.747
U.S.A.‡
BituminousAugust, 1936CentsNot available81.0
Anthracite83.9
* Including overtime and family, etc., allowances where it is usual to make such payments.
† Including lignite mines.
‡ Average hourly earnings.

a copy of this statement to the hon. Member. So far as I am aware, the only change that has taken place since the publication of the report is that in France where, by virtue of Article 2 of a Government Decree dated 25th September, 1936, the hours of work for underground workers were reduced to a maximum of 7 hours 45 minutes per day and 38 hours 40 minutes per week as from 1st November, 1936. The length of time spent in the mine is calculated from the time when the worker enters the cage in order to descend, up to the time when he has ascended; it includes a rest period of 25 minutes. I understand that the principle of a 7 ½-hour day will be introduced in Belgian coal mines as from 1st February next.

asked the Secretary for Mines whether he will provide a statement giving the average daily earnings of mineworkers, above and below ground, respectively, for each coal-producing country and for the latest available date?

The most recent information available from official sources is contained in the following statement:

Wage Rates (Changes)

asked the Minister of Labour whether he can state, in anticipation of his annual report, what changes in rates of wages in Great Britain and Northern Ireland took place in 1936?

Particulars of the changes which took place during 1936 in rates of wages in Great Britain and Northern Ireland are given on pages 3 to 5 of the January issue of the "Ministry of Labour Gazette."

London Traffic Advisory Committee

asked the Minister of Transport whether the constitution of the London and Home Counties Traffic Advisory Committee provides for representation of road users on the committee other than motorists, motor-vehicle owners, and their employés; and, if not, whether he will make provision for representatives of pedestrians and cyclists to be appointed on this important body?

No provision is made in the Statute for the direct representation of pedestrians or cyclists.

Malaya (Colonial Service)

asked the Secretary of State for the Colonies whether he will consider the advisability of making some positions in the British Colonial Service in Malaya partly interchangeable with the British Consular Service in Siam and the Dutch East Indies?

The functions of the Colonial Service and the Consular Service differ so widely that it would not be feasible or practicable to give effect to my hon. and gallant Friend's suggestion.

Bulgaria (Stabilisation Loan)

asked the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs whether, in view of the economic burdens placed on Bulgaria by the peace treaties and also in view of the difficulty of Bulgaria to meet her obligations, he will ask the League of Nations' Council to reconsider the conditions laid down in the 1928 protocol on financial assistance to Bulgaria?

I assume that the hon. Member is referring to the conditions in regard to the service of the Bulgarian 7½ per cent. stabilisation loan of 1928. The Council of the League of Nations has no power to vary the contract governing the service of this loan. But proposals for a temporary reduction in the payments to be transferred in foreign exchange for the service of this and other Bulgarian loans have been made by the Bulgarian Government and the representatives of the bondholders have recommended the latter to accept these proposals. Details will be found in the annual reports of the League Loans Committee in London and of the Council of Foreign Bondholders.

Telephone Service, Scotland

asked the Postmaster-General what is the proportion of telephones to population in the following places, namely., the burgh of Kirkwall, the burgh of Stromness, the county of Orkney, excluding the burghs of Kirkwall and Stromness, the burgh of Lerwick, and the county of Shetland, excluding the burgh of Lerwick?

The proportion of telephones to population (taking the 1931 census as a basis) of the places mentioned by the hon. Member is as follows:

Telephones per 100 population.
Burgh of Kirkwall6·8
Burgh of Stromness1·9
County of Orkney (excluding the Burghs of Kirkwall and Stromness)0·3
Burgh of Lerwick6·8
County of Shetland (excluding the Burgh of Lerwick)0·5