Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 322: debated on Friday 16 April 1937

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers

Government Employes, Manchester (Wages)

asked the Home Secretary whether he is aware that certain men are employed by the Air Raids Precaution Department, Derby Street, Manchester, at the rate of 1s. per hour; and whether this is the trade union rate of wages prevailing for such employment?

Certain men are employed by the Air Raid Precautions Department at Manchester at 1s. per hour, which is understood to be the usual rate of pay for the kind of work they are performing. There does not appear to be any trade union rate for the class of work in question.

Special Areas (Block Grants)

asked the Minister of Health how many of the counties scheduled, partly or wholly, as Special Areas, benefited as a result of the modification in the block-grant formula, stating also the sum of money received in each case for the year 1936–37 and the present financial year?

The following administrative counties, which are scheduled wholly or partly as Special Areas, benefited as a result of the modification in the block-grant formula:

Name.County Apportionment.
1936–37.1937–38.
££
Cumberland414,206473,694
Durham1,555,6491,726,326
Northumberland591,764641,753
Brecknock99,316118,559
Glamorgan1,295,1501,524,696
Monmouth526,717674,816
Pembroke155,435184,457
The 1937–38 figures are based on provisional data, and are therefore subject to adjustment. In addition, as part of the new block grant arrangements these counties benefit from the cessation of the contributions which up to 1st April, 1937, were payable by them under the Unemployment Act, 1934.

Criminal Statistics

asked the Home Secretary whether he is aware that the Annual Report of the Prisons Commission for 1935 has only just been presented to Parliament and that the Criminal Statistics for 1935 have not yet been published; and whether, in view of the importance of these Reports, he will endeavour to expedite publication for the year 1936 and subsequent years?

Consideration has already been given to the question how to accelerate the preparation of the general Criminal Statistics and the Prison Statistics with due regard to economy in clerical labour, and I am glad to say that for the year 1937 a new system of collecting and compiling the statistics has been introduced. It is hoped that the new system will make it possible to publish the figures for 1937 early in 1938. As regards the Report of the Prison Commissioners, I may point out that, while the statistical information relates to 1935, much of the information given in the Report relates to the work of 1936.

Ammanford Employment Exchange.Burry Port Employment Exchange.Carmarthen Employment Exchange.Garnant Employment Exchange.Kidwelly Employment Exchange.Llanelly Employment Exchange.Tumble Employment Exchange.
Approximate number of unemployment books exchanged by insured persons (July, 1936):—
Men, aged 18–644,5601,0803,2204,4601,40013,4305,610
Women, aged 18–642107045060501,77070
Juveniles, aged 14–1743060340330901,860510
Total aged 14–645,2001,2104,0104,8501,54017,0606,190
Number of insured persons recorded as unemployed at 15th March, 1931:—
Men, aged 18–641,7476274082,5785262,426727
Women, aged 18–6423193727617917
Juveniles, aged 14–17922515134311245
Total aged 14–641,8626714602,7395352,717789
Insured persons with claims admitted for insurance benefit at 15th March, 1937:—
Men, aged 18–649992022261,7021861,111419
Women, aged 18–6418132617112115
Juveniles aged 16 & 17651871034515
Total aged 16–64†1,0822332591,8221871,277449
Insured persons with applications authorised for unemployment allowances at 15th March, 1937:—
Men, aged 18–642944041548333141,164284
Women, aged 18–6425783142
Total aged 18–64†2964091618413171,178286
The above figures exclude persons insured under the Agricultural Scheme.
† Juveniles under 16 years of age are not entitled to apply for benefit or for unemployment allowances; unemployed insured juveniles aged 16 and 17 were, at 15th March, not entitled to apply for unemployment allowances.

Unemployment

South Wales (Statistics)

asked the Minister of Labour what was the number of insured workers on the registers, the number of such workers who were unemployed on the last available date, men, women, and juveniles, respectively, and the number who were at that date in receipt of benefit and the number in receipt of assistance at the following Employment Exchanges: Llanelly, Tumble, Ammanford, Garnant, Burry Port, Kidwelly, and Carmarthen?

Courts Of Referees (Benefit Refused)

asked the Minister of Labour whether he can state the percentage of rejections for benefit by Courts of Referees during 1936 at the following Employment Exchanges: Stoke-on-Trent, Longton, Sheffield, Glasgow, West Ham, and Bristol; and the percentage of rejections for the whole country?

pursuant to his reply (OFFICIAL REPORT, 8th April, 1937; col. 326, Vol. 322), supplied the following statement:

The following Table shows for the areas mentioned the number of claims disallowed by Courts of Referees during 1936 as percentages of the numbers of claims considered:

Area.Claims disallowed per cent, of claims considered.
Great Britain75
Stoke-on-Trent72
Longton72
Sheffield69
Glasgow71
West Ham81
Bristol81