Skip to main content

Written Answers

Volume 443: debated on Friday 24 October 1947

The text on this page has been created from Hansard archive content, it may contain typographical errors.

Written Answers To Questions

Friday, 24th October, 1947

Government Stores (Losses)

asked the Minister of Supply the number and value of the lots of Government stores at each of his Department's depots which have disappeared between the time of cataloguing and auction during the past 12 months.

During the past 12 months one lot, valued at £25, has disappeared between cataloguing and auction.

Vivisection (Cats And Dogs)

asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many experiments with and without the use of anæsthetics were performed, under the Cruelty to Animals Act, 1876, on cats and dogs during the year 1946; and in how many of the experiments were the animals allowed to recover from the effects of the anaesthetic.

The following table gives the required information:

Number of Experiments performed onCats.Dogs.
(a) With anæsthetics2,111411
(b) Without anæsthetics231620
(c) With anæsthetics from which the animals were allowed to recover (included in (a))263144

School Children (Clothing)

asked the Minister of Education how many local education authorities are supplying vouchers to parents of school children enabling them to obtain clothing free of charge; and whether this grant is subject to a means test.

My approval is not required to the exercise by local education authorities of their powers for supplying school children with clothing, and the information asked for in the first part of the Question is therefore not available.

Under Section 52 of the Education Act, 1944, the local education authority must require the parent to pay such sums, not exceeding the cost of the clothing, as in their opinion he is able without financial hardship to pay.

Legal Aid (Rushcliffe Report)

asked the Attorney-General if it is intended to introduce legislation to carry out the Rushcliffe Report on Legal Aid to Poor Persons.

The general proposals of the Rushcliffe Report have been accepted in principle, and it is intended to introduce legislation to give effect to them. I cannot say that this will be during the present Session, but it is hoped to introduce it during this Session if time permits.

Housing, Scotland

asked the Secretary of State for Scotland if he has considered a protest by the Buckhaven local authority, sent to him by the hon. Member for West Fife, regarding the cutting down of capital expenditure and the adverse effect it will have on house building; and what answer he has made.

I have considered the representations from Buckhaven town council and I would refer the hon. Member to the statement on the capital investment programme made yesterday by my right hon. Friend the Minister for Economic Affairs. I hope shortly to issue a circular to local authorities in Scotland about the effect of the new proposals on the housing programme.

"Jewish Standard" (Government Advertising)

asked the Prime Minister, in view of the successful prosecution for seditious libel brought by the Director of Public Prosecutions against a provincial editor, whether he will instruct the Director of Public Prosecutions to consider prosecuting on a similar charge the editor of the "Jewish Standard," and whether he will now reconsider his answer of 18th April, 1947, to the hon. Member for London University with regard to advertisements by Government Departments in that journal.

I am informed that the case to which the hon. Member refers is still sub judice. With regard to the second part of the Question, all advertising by Government Departments in the "Jewish Standard" has now ceased because of an increase in that paper's advertising rates, which was considered to make the cost too great in proportion to the results.

Buckwheat Crop, Suffolk

asked the Minister of Agriculture in view of the present food situation, what action he proposes to take against those responsible for ploughing up Mr. Frank Dennis's field of buckwheat on 16th September last; whether he will allow Mr. Dennis to have recourse to an independent arbitrator to determine whether the Suffolk War Agriculture Executive Committee's order was a proper one; and whether, in view of the assurances given to Parliament during the passage of the Agriculture Act, he will take steps to avoid such action in regard to established farmers.

Under the Buckwheat, Millet and Canary Seed (Control of Cultivation) Order, 1947, the growing of buckwheat is prohibited except with the consent of the county war agricultural executive committee, and if consent is given it is normally granted only for small acreages. Although buckwheat can be, and is, used for the feeding of poultry, a substantial proportion of even the limited quantity which is so grown is in fact sold at high prices for the feeding of caged birds. Where, therefore, buckwheat, canary seed, or millet has been illegally grown without consent and the crop is still in a green state, it has been the practice, with my approval, to require the crop to be ploughed in, in order to ensure that the grower secures no profit from his illegal action. It is proposed to take proceedings against Mr. Dennis for contravention of the Order, and Mr. Dennis will therefore have an opportunity of bringing the facts of the case before a court of law. As regards the last part of the Question, if I understand the hon. Member aright, the assurances to which he refers do not apply to a case of this kind.

Housing

Rent Restriction

asked the Minister of Health if it is intended to introduce legislation to give effect to the Report of the Ridley Committee on the Rent Restrictions Act.

Hereford Rural District

asked the Minister of Health what is the reason for the delay in building houses in the area administered by the Hereford rural district council.

The main cause of delay has been the selection of sites for which a pure and adequate water supply could be provided. This difficulty has now been overcome as respects a number of sites, and preparations for building are being pressed forward.

Building Licences, Beverley

asked the Minister of Health whether he will now issue licences for the erection of houses in the borough of Beverley on the lines suggested by the corporation in their communication to his Department of 28th May, 1947.

No. Local authorities were notified on 15th August, 1947, in a circular, a copy of which I am sending to the hon. Member, of the Government's decision that the issue of further licences cannot for the time being be authorised except in special cases referred to in the circular.

Airey Houses (Swindon)

asked the Minister of Health whether he is aware that Messrs. Pope Brothers, of Cricklade Street, Swindon, have been unable to complete their programme of Airey houses owing to the impossibility of obtaining joists and other materials promised them by his department; and whether he will give an assurance that all promised materials will now be delivered.

I am aware that there has been some unavoidable delay. But the firm's immediate requirements have been met and I hope there will be no further hold-up.

Surplus Huts, Aqualate Park

asked the Minister of Health what consideration has been given by members of his Department to the use of surplus huts in Aqualate Park, near Newport, Salop, for emergency housing.

These huts have been offered to the local authority for housing and their decision is awaited.

National Health Service (Medical Practitioners)

asked the Minister of Health how many times he has personally met the Negotiating Committee appointed with the approval of the Minister by the medical profession, to discuss regulations to be made under the National Health Service Act; and what was the date of the last such meeting.

These discussions have so far taken place with my officials following a procedure which I believe to be entirely acceptable to the Negotiating Committee. At their request I have arranged to meet the Committee myself next month.

African Colonies

Gold Coast (Seized Books)

asked the Secretary, of State for the Colonies the reasons for the initial ban on the book, "How Russia Transformed Her Colonial Empire," in the Gold Coast; and what procedure is followed by the Government of the Gold Coast in arriving at such decisions.

A consignment of 200 copies of this book was seized by the Comptroller of Customs under Section 27 of the Gold Coast Customs Ordinance which prohibits the importation into the Colony of "Books, Newspapers and Printed Matter which in the opinion of the Comptroller (subject to any directions of the Governor), are seditious, defamatory, scandalous or demoralising." In the exercise of these powers the Comptroller is advised by a Committee consisting of the Director of Education, the Public Relations Officer and an African Member of the Legislative Council. The final decision rests, however, with the Governor and in this case the Acting Governor after full consideration of the views of the Advisory Committee, decided that the disadvantages of allowing the book in question to circulate in the Colony were not sufficiently weighty to justify banning it. The consignment was accordingly released.

Kenya (Strike, Nairobi)

asked the Secretary of State for the Colonies in what circumstances police fired on strikers at a Government-owned bacon factory near Nairobi on 6th September, 1947; how many casualties resulted; what were the causes of the strike; and what subsequent action has been taken by the Government.

The immediate cause of the strike, which involved some 200 workers at the Uplands Bacon Factory, was a refusal by the manager to accede to a demand that he should dismiss his African head clerk who had refused to attend a political meeting some days earlier or to contribute to a fund intended to buy food for the strikers. Despite every effort by Labour and Administrative Officers and an assurance by the strikers' spokesmen that they had no complaint regarding wages or conditions of employment, the strikers refused to return to work and, being joined by some 500 Africans from the neighbourhood armed with sticks, cutlasses and knives, became very truculent and advanced within a few yards of the District Commissioner who was attempting to reason with them. They became so threatening that a baton charge by the small party of police present was ordered. This failed to disperse the crowd and after many of the police and officials had been injured by stone-throwing and were in imminent danger of being overrun, the senior police officer ordered six of his rifle party to fire on the rioters, who retreated after 18 rounds had been fired. Three rioters were killed and three are known to have been injured. Order was then restored and 90 per cent. of the strikers later returned to work.

In the opinion of the officers present the 18 rounds fired were the bare minimum required to restore order, and I am satisfied from the Governor's reports that the administrative and police officers present acted with the most praiseworthy restraint in the face of the greatest provocation and at the risk of the most dangerous consequences to themselves. An inquest was ordered and on 24th September the Resident Magistrate, Nairobi, found that three persons killed died through their own misadventure.

Fiji (Court Sentences, Appeals)

asked the Secretary of State for the Colonies how many sentences of death and imprisonment of any kind, exceeding six months, were awarded by the criminal courts in Fiji in the years 1944, 1945 and 1946, respectively; in how many of these cases appeals were made; and how many of these appeals resulted in quashing of the conviction and reduction of the sentence, respectively.

I am afraid that my information is not complete in all details. I am asking the Acting Governor for particulars, and will communicate with the hon. and gallant Member again.

asked the Secretary of State for the Colonies what facilities for appeal are available to a person convicted of a criminal offence in Fiji by a magistrates' court and the Supreme Court of Fiji, respectively; and whether he is satisfied that these facilities provide adequate protection against injustice, especially to poor defendants.

There is a right of appeal in criminal cases to the Supreme Court from a Magistrates' Court and, in addition, the Supreme Court has powers of revision over the proceedings. The Privy Council may grant special leave to appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court. As regards the second part of the Question, I am in communication with the Governor regarding the question of setting up a local court of appeal.